Information to Users

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information to Users INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Advances in distribution system reliability assessment by Nagaraj Balijepalli A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major : Electrical Engineering (Electric Power) S. S. Venkata, Major Professor Venkataramana Ajjarapu Richard D. Christie James D. McCalley William Q. Meeker Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2002 Copyright © Nagaraj Balijepalli, 2002. All rights reserved. UMI Number 3051448 UMT UMI Microform 3051448 Copyright 2002 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation of Nagaraj Balijepalli has met the dissertation requirements of Iowa State University Signature was redacted for privacy. Major Professor Signature was redacted for privacy. the Major Department iii H<NW 4^4 Hik1^Tl4 RR ^cTRÏT: V&g ^^frS^TFRt ^KWdi4^ltld4i «H4IM<ci|IWH: I VRcT: f¥ qqr 5P7T r# wutitiT W ? f%% Wn^F9^ll Adi Sankara in Sivaanandalahari iv Table of Contents List of Figures ....... ***»**#*#*#**#**« List of Tables..— Acknowledgements. M»**#»######**»#*#**#*####*******#*##*****#****#*»**#******#*#*###»**#**####*####*******##*#*****» Abstract ..m..m......m..........< • XI 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Deregulation and the growing importance of distribution reliability 1 1.2 Quantitative measures of distribution system reliability 2 1.3 Review of previous work 3 1.4 Distribution system reliability during storm conditions 6 1.5 Research objective 7 1.6 Organization of the document 7 2. System Reliability Assessment: Practical Considerations for Monte Carlo Methods»9 2.1 System reliability indices 10 2.2 Simulation as a tool for analysis 11 2.3 Line segment failure and repair processes - Data analysis and modeling 12 2.4 Monte Carlo simulation for distribution system reliability 18 2.4.1 Convergence criteria (Confidence testing and time limit for simulation) 20 2.4.2 The simulation algorithm 20 2.4.3 Computational performance of Monte Carlo simulation 22 2.5 Probability histograms of the system indices 25 2.5.1 System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAJFI) 25 2.5.2 Momentary Average Interruption-Event Frequency Index (MAIFIE) 26 2.5.3 Momentary Average Interruption Frequency Index (MAIFl) 27 2.5.4 Customer Average Interruption Frequency Index (CAIFI) 28 2.5.5 Average System Interruption Frequency Index (ASIFI) 29 V 2.5.6 System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) 29 2.5.7 Customer Average Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI) 30 2.5.8 Customer Total Average Interruption Duration Index (CTAIDI) 31 2.5.9 Average System Interruption Duration Index (ASIDl) 31 2.6 Probability plots of SAIDI and SAIFI indices 32 2.6.1 System SAJDI probability plots 32 2.6.2 System SAIFI probability plots 34 2.7 Sensitivity of SAIDI and SAIFI indices to failure and repair models 36 2.7.1 Sensitivity of reliability indices to failure models 36 2.7.2 Sensitivity of reliability indices to repair models 36 2.8 Analysis of SAIFI of individual feeders 37 2.9 Conclusions 41 3. Sensitivity Analysis of Distribution System Reliability Indices.................................... 42 3.1 Analysis of annual feeder indices 45 3.1. I Analysis of annual feeder indices 46 3.1.2 Analysis of feeder indices over two consecutive years 47 3.2 Analysis of system reliability indices 50 3.2.1 Analysis of annual system indices 53 3.2.2 Analysis of system indices over two consecutive years 54 3.2.3 Sensitivity to prevailing feeder reliability level. 56 3.3 Discussion 58 3.4 Conclusions 60 4. Lightning Storm Reliability Assessment for Distribution Systems 61 4.1 A brief review of how lightning flashes cause power outages 62 4.2 An introduction to lightning detection 63 4.3 Motivation for current research 64 4.4 Modeling lightning storm intensity and duration 68 4.4.1 The philosophy of parametric modeling. 69 4.4.2 An example of parametric modeling 70 vi 4.4.3 Bootstrap sampling for lightning storms. 72 4.5 Lightning storms and line flashover rate: The IEEE standard method 73 4.5.1 Direct flashover failure rate 73 4.5.2 Induced flashover rate 75 4.6 Monte Carlo simulation for lightning storm reliability 76 4.7 Application to a practical system 78 4.7.1 Lightning data analysis 79 4.7.2 Momentary and sustained outages 80 4.7.3 Simulation results... 81 4.8 Conclusions 85 5. Summary, Conclusions and Directions for Future Research........................................ 86 5.1 Summary and conclusions 86 5.2 Main contributions 88 5.3 Directions for future research 88 5.3.1 Impact of reliability standards on load point indices 88 5.3.2 Effect of Dispersed Storage and Generation (DSG) facilities on distribution reliability 89 5.3.3 Reliability of networked distribution systems. 89 5.3.4 Modeling of faults caused by wind storms 89 5.3.5 Analytical storm reliability assessment 89 5.3.6 Including storm-caused outages in vegetation maintenance scheduling 90 5.3.7 Integration of statistical distribution of reliability indices in system design 90 5.3.8 Statistical modeling of line segment outage rate 90 Appendix .............................................................................................................................. 91 Terminology and Definitions of Reliability Indices 91 Example 97 Reliability Assessment Using FMEA Method: 97 Historical Reliability Assessment Method ( Used in Monte Carlo Simulation) 100 References 104 vii List of Figures Figure 2.1 Cumulative fault count vs. Operating time 15 Figure 2.2 Time between failures 17 Figure 2.3 Interruption duration 17 Figure 2.4 System after preprocessing procedure 20 Figure 2.5 Monte Carlo simulation for reliability assessment 21 Figure 2.6 Computational performance of the Monte Carlo algorithm 23 Figure 2.7 Convergence properties of the simulation 24 Figure 2.8 Number of faults simulated for convergence 24 Figure 2.9 Probability histogram of SAIFI 26 Figure 2.10 Probability histogram of system MAIFIE 27 Figure 2.11 Probability histogram of MAIFI 28 Figure 2.12 Probability histogram of system CAIFI 28 Figure 2.13 Probability histogram of system ASIFI 29 Figure 2.14 SAIDI Probability histogram 30 Figure 2.15 Probability histogram of system CAIDI 30 Figure 2.16 Probability histogram of system CTAIDI 31 Figure 2.17 Probability histogram of system ASIDI 32 Figure 2.19 Probability plots of system SAIDI 33 Figure 2.20 Probability plots of system SAIFI 34 Figure 2.20 (Cont.) Probability plots of system SAIFI 35 Figure 2.21 Probability density function plots of SAIFI 36 Figure 2.22 Probability density function plots of SAIFI 37 Figure 2.23 Topology of Feeder F84A 38 Figure 2.24 SAIFI probability histogram for feeder F84A 39 Figure 2.25 SAIFI probability histogram for the redesigned feeder F84A 40 Figure 3.1 Probability plot of SAIDI for feeder F78B 45 Figure 3.2 Probability plot of SAIFI for feeder F78B 46 Figure 3.3 Probability plot of system SAIDI 51 viii Figure 3.4 Probability plot of system SAIFI 51 Figure 3.5 Relative standard deviation of SAIFI and SAIDI vs. system size 52 Figure 3.6 SO measure for SAIDI vs. system size 54 Figure 3.7 SO measure for SAIFI vs. system size 54 Figure 3.8 SI measure for SAIDI vs. system size 55 Figure 3.9 SI measure for SAIFI vs. system size 55 Figure 3.10 Relative standard deviation of SAIDI vs. failure rate 56 Figure 3.11 SO measure for SAIDI vs. failure rate 57 Figure 3.12 SO measure for SAIFI vs. failure rate 57 Figure 4.1 Lightning intensity distribution 71 Figure 4.2 Lightning storm duration distribution 71 Figure 4.3 Number of induced flashovers of overhead distribution lines vs. CFO 76 Figure 4.4 Storm reliability assessment module for distribution systems 78 Figure 4.5 Sustained outages and permanent faults vs Number of lightning flashes 81 Figure 4.6 MAIFI histogram 83 Figure 4.7 MAIFIE histogram 84 Figure 4.8 SAIFI histogram 84 Figure 4.9 SAIDI histogram 84 Figure Al. Example system for calculation of reliability indices 97 ix List of Tables Table l.l Comparative assessment of computational performance 23 Table 3.1 FO measure for feeder SAIDI and SAIFI 47 Table 3.2. The 10 worst performing feeders based on SAIDI 49 Table 3.3. The 10 worst performing feeders based on SAIFI 49 Table 3.4 SAIDI and SAIFI of different systems 52 Table 3.5 Storm types and their characteristics (66 months of data) 59 Table 4.1 Reliability indices due to lightning storms (2000 years of simulation) 83 Table 4.2 Mean and standard deviation (std) of reliability indices 83 Table AI.
Recommended publications
  • 126-2009: Distribution Interruption Performance Reporting
    SAS Global Forum 2009 Energy and Utilities Paper 126-2009 Distribution Interruption Performance Reporting: A Complete Solution Author, Chris van der Westhuizen ABSTRACT Most electrical distributors are required to report on the performance of their distributed electrical networks. These measures are required at operational and strategic levels within utilities. Distribution Network Interruption Performance Reporting is the standardized reporting of measures that reflect the performance (reliability) of an electrical distributed network. The measures used for reporting network performance is guided by several international industry standards e.g. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and International Council on Large Electric Systems (Cigre). Inconsistent, unreliable and non standardized reporting of reliability indices across distributors are the main problems within the industry. This is due to distributed application systems and different interpretations of international standards when calculating reliability indices. This paper aims to give the electrical utility industry an insight into standardization of reporting distribution interruption performance indices by conforming to international standards. The reader will obtain a better perspective of the problems encountered in the industry as well as how a SAS® solution is utilized for reporting these reliability indices. The paper will demonstrate how the problem areas are addressed by utilizing a pre packaged SAS® Business Intelligence solution comprising of: source data extraction, data storage, calculation of reliability indices in accordance with international standards and reporting these indices using SAS® standard reporting. 1 SAS Global Forum 2009 Energy and Utilities INTRODUCTION The IEEE 1366 Standard (Ref 1) is a widely accepted international guide that stipulates the required reporting indices to reflect electrical distribution system performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Demand Response on Distribution System Reliability
    1 Impact of Demand Response on Distribution System Reliability Salman Mohagheghi, Member, IEEE, Fang Yang, Member, IEEE Bamdad Falahati, Student Member, IEEE Abstract—Demand response (DR) is a market driven and aspect of the Smart Grid. Modern distribution automation sometimes semi-emergency action performed at the utility level systems adopt new techniques for fault detection, isolation or at the Demand Response Service Provider (aggregator) with and restoration so that the smallest possible part of the system the objective of reducing the overall demand of the system during is de-energized as a result of a fault while the rest of the peak load hours. If implemented successfully, DR helps postpone customers are supplied through alternative paths and the capacity expansion projects related to the distribution network, and provides a collaborative framework for the alternative resources [3], [4]. In addition, solutions such as liberalized energy market of the Smart Grid. Customers Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS), energy storage devices subscribed to the DR program are requested to reduce their and distributed energy resources are some of the alternatives demand or turn off one or more energy consuming appliances in introduced at the distribution level in order to boost the system exchange for financial incentives such as extra payments or reliability for the customers. Although these devices are discounted electricity rates. This would change the concept of efficient in providing short term energy, their role and distribution system reliability as is traditionally known. From one hand, DR could lead to a higher amount of unserved energy; effectiveness is still complementary to that of the grid, and on the other hand, it does not qualify as an unwanted lost load.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability and Power Quality
    Metrics for Micro Grid: Reliability and Power Quality 1 © 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Regional Causes of Power Outage From: Public Power Magazine “Reliability Is a Daily Regimen“ September-October 2014 issue Vol. 72, No. 5 2 © 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. The value of distribution resilience - Customer Outages for Major Events Year Event Name Outages Location Damage ($ Million) 2012 Sandy 8,500,000 Northeast US ~100,000 2012 Derecho 4,200,000 Mid-Atlantic 4,000 2011 Irene 6,400,000 Eastern US 10,000 2011 Blizzard 650,000 Mid-Atlantic 1,800 2009 Ice Storm 2,000,000 Midwest 700 2008 Ice Storm 1,700,000 Northeast 80 2008 Ike 6,000,000 Gulf Coast 29,500 2008 Gustav 1,300,000 Gulf Coast 7,000 2007 Ice Storm 900,000 Midwest 200 2007 Wildfires 600,000 California 2,500 2006 Wind Storm 1,800,000 Pacific Northwest 220 2005 Katrina 2,000,000 Gulf Coast 100,000 2005 Rita 1,300,000 Gulf Coast 12,000 3 © 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Sag and Interruption Rate by Month: System Wide, One- Minute Aggregate Window, 1/1/2009 through 12/31/2012 Tropical 5 Storm Beryl 4.5 May-12 Sags (10%<V<90%) 4 Interruptions (V<10%) Tornado Mar-12 3.5 Outbreak Apr-11 3 Sep-11 y = 0.0009x - 33.61 2.5 Jul-12 Days Jun-10 2 Jun-09 Oct-12 Nov-09 1.5 1 Oct-10 Tropical Storm Sandy Aug-12 0.5 Oct-09 Aug-11 y = 0.0002x - 6.2165 DerechoOct-10 Sag and Interruptions per Site per 30 Oct-12 0 Apr-11 Jul-09 Jul-10 Jul-11 Jul-12 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Mar-09 Mar-10 Mar-11 Mar-12 Sep-09 Sep-10 Sep-11 Sep-12 Nov-11 Nov-09 Nov-10 Nov-12 May-09 May-10 May-11 May-12 4 © 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Processing of Reliability Index Assessment and Reliability-Based Network Reconfiguration in Power Distribution Systems Fangxing Li, Member, IEEE
    230 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 20, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2005 Distributed Processing of Reliability Index Assessment and Reliability-Based Network Reconfiguration in Power Distribution Systems Fangxing Li, Member, IEEE Abstract—Parallel and distributed processing has been broadly generation and transmission systems by Monte Carlo simu- applied to scientific and engineering computing, including various lation [12]. These previous works can be classified into two aspects of power system analysis. This paper first presents a dis- categories: applications of parallel processing [4]–[6], [12] tributed processing approach of reliability index assessment (RIA) for distribution systems. Then, this paper proposes a balanced and applications of distributed processing [7]–[12]. It appears task partition approach to achieve better efficiency. Next, the dis- that more recent works focus on distributed processing. This tributed processing of RIA is applied to reliability-based network is probably due to the latest development in network hardware reconfiguration (NR), which employs an algorithm combining and software, which makes distributed processing faster, more local search and simulated annealing to optimize system reliability. broadly available, and easier-to-implement than before. Testing results are presented to demonstrate the speeded execution of RIA and NR with distributed processing. This paper presents distributed processing schemes of relia- bility index assessment (RIA) and reliability-based network re- Index Terms—Network reconfiguration, parallel and distributed configuration (NR) for distribution systems. Here, the radial dis- processing, power distribution systems, reliability index assess- ment, scalability, simulated annealing. tribution system is addressed, since the majority of U.S. distri- bution systems are radial. In addition, system-level reliability indices are addressed because they are the primary reliability I.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE 1366- Reliability Indices
    IEEE 1366- Reliability Indices IEEE Boston Section- February 19, 2019 John Teixeira, National Grid Some Important Definitions Purpose of IEEE-1366 1. To foster uniformity in the development of distribution service reliability indices and to aid in consistent reporting practices among utilities. 2. To provide guidance for new personnel in the reliability area and to provide tools for internal as well as external comparisons. National Grid 3 What’s a customer Customer: “A metered electrical service point for which an active bill account is established at a specific location.” Sounds like common sense. Just remember: A Three-decker is three customers. An apartment building may be 100 customers. Load doesn’t matter. Population doesn’t matter. National Grid 4 Interruption vs. Outage Interruption: Outage: “The total loss of electric power on one or more “The loss of ability of a component to deliver normally energized conductors to one or more power.” customers connected to the distribution portion of the system.” Does not include “Power Quality” issues (sags, swells, etc.) Part power? Loss of “power” not “voltage”? Distinction: Interruption refers to CUSTOMERS Outage refers to EQUIPMENT National Grid 5 Momentary vs. Sustained Interruption Momentary Interruption: Sustained Interruption: “The brief loss of power delivery to one or more “Any interruption not classified as a part of a customers caused by the opening and closing momentary event. That is, any interruption that operation of an interrupting device.” lasts more than five minutes.” Each recloser operation is a separate Some companies and/or jurisdictions may use momentary interruption one minute or some other interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Distribution Reliability
    ISSN: 2319-8753 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Vol. 3, Issue 9, September 2014 Electrical Distribution Reliability Ashraf Abd Almageed Ahmad1, Dr.Eltahar Mohammed Hussein2 Graduate College Studies, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan Faculty of Engineering, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum Sudan ABSTRACT: The continuous power outages and interruptions in the instantaneous electrical parts distribution network always adversely affect the health, safety and economic activity and the low level of production in the industrial sector .the paper discusses the reliability of the electric distribution network through the study of indicators of reliability analysis technology which is characterized as a fast, efficient and know that by SAIFI, SAIDI, CAIDI, MAIFI, CTAIDI, in order to repeat the failures at different times for Lines 33KV and 11KV, from readings to the control station for the automated distribution network for the Omdurman area. KEYWORDS: SAIFI, SAIDI, CAIDI, CAIFI, MAIFI, CTAIDI, distribution, reliability. I.INTRODUCTION Provide consumers with electric power in the range of distribution of electrical networks in a way that the quality of service and high reliability, and that the importance of the reliability of electrical distribution networks as a factor of development and economic growth, as studies have shown which confirmed that 80% of interruptions in the supply of electric power resulting from the problems and breakdowns in the electrical distribution networks [1,2] . Electrical distribution systems are usually radially so exposed to the rates of interruption because of system components of transformers and breakers and switching devices, the growing demand for customers to provide high-quality service makes requirements for improvements in the electrical distribution network.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Distribution System Reliability Assessment Nagaraj Balijepalli Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2002 Advances in distribution system reliability assessment Nagaraj Balijepalli Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Electrical and Electronics Commons Recommended Citation Balijepalli, Nagaraj, "Advances in distribution system reliability assessment " (2002). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 357. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/357 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]