Insect Pollinators of Carrots in Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Insect Pollinators of Carrots in Utah Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All PIRU Publications Pollinating Insects Research Unit 4-1960 Insect Pollinators of Carrots in Utah George E. Bohart Utah State University William P. Nye Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/piru_pubs Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Bohart, George E., and William P. Nye. 1960. Insect Pollinators of Carrots in Utah. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 419. 16 p. This Bulletin is brought to you for free and open access by the Pollinating Insects Research Unit at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All PIRU Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. tt-1 o i~JJJ,t:,;~V\'" ""\;,../ . t ~:'~ .• I t by GEORGE E. ,'/ I OF AGRI CULTURE CKNOWLEDGMENTS are due M. D. Levin and L. R. Hawthorn, both of the Agricultural Research Service, who helped plan and carry ofA the experiments of which these observations are a part. S. F. McClellan, Takeshi Miura, and W. A. Trost, graduate students at Utah State Univer­ sity, made most of the many observations. Determinations of the carrot pollinators were made by taxonomic specialists of the Entomology Research Division and by ,V. D. Field, H. A. Scullen, R. M. Bohart, H. E. Evans, M. T. James, and the senior author. The authors are both entomologists with the Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. They are stationed on the Utah State University Campus and work coop- eratiwly with the Agricultural Experiment Station. Title on cover picture should read' Left a drone fly (Tubifera tenax) one of·th ' abundan t and. eff1cient carrot' pollinatorse most o~ the experimental plots at Logan. U er ~1g?t, pollen-collecting honey bee. N~~e 1nt1mat~ contact of body and flower cluster. Lower :1ght, nectar-collecting honey bee. There 1S only slight contact between body and flower cluster. ABSTRACT N THE course of observation at Logan, Utah, on the occurrence and pollina­ I ting activities of insects on carrots grown for seed, 334 species represent­ ing 71 families, were collected. Most numerous in species were the hymenopterous families and superfamilies Sphecidae, Apoidea, Psammo­ charidae, Vespidae, and Ichneumonidae, and the dipterous families Syrphidae, Tachinidae, Bombyliidae, Stratiomyidae, and Sarcophagidae. Most numer­ ous in individuals were the dipterous families Syrphidae, Ceratopogonidae, Chloropidae, and Piophilidae and the coleopterous family Coccinellidae. Families and superfamilies represented by the most efficient pollinators were Apoidea, Sphecidae, Syrphidae, and Stratiomyidae. Abundance times effi­ ciency was used as a pollination index for each species. On this basis the most important genera of Apoidea were Apis: Andrena, Halictus, Chloralictus, and Colletes; of Sphecidae, Cerceris, Lindenius, Philanthus, Nysson, and Sceliphron; of Syrphidae, Syritta and Tubifera; of Stratiomyidae, Eulalia and Stratiomys. Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) were efficient pollinators, but they were only minor factors in the Logan area because of their scarcity on carrot flowers. In most areas a combination of honey bee colonies adjacent to car­ rot seed fields and elimination of competing bloom may be the most practical method of increasing carrot pollination. -1- CONTENTS page Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 Description of area.................................................................................................. 3 Characteristics of carrot flowers............................................................................ 3 Variety and abundance of pollinators.................................................................. 4 Efficiency of pollinators......... ................................................................................. 6 ~Iethods of increasing pollinators ........................... ~ ..................................... ~ ........ 10 Insects visiting carrot flowers in the vicinity of Logan, Utah, 1954-1957 ........ 10 Hymenoptera .................................................................................................... 10 Diptera ............... :.............................................................................................. 12 Coleoptera ........... .............................................................................................. 14 Lepidoptera ...................................................................................................... 15 Hemiptera ........... ............................................................................................. 15 IIollloptera ........................................................................................................ 15 Neufoptera ........................................................................................................ 15 Orthoptera .......................................................................................................... 16 Dermaptera ...................................................................................................... 16 Thysanoptera .................................................................................................... 16 INSECT POLLINATORS OF CARROTS IN UTAH by George E. Bohart and William P. Nye ROM 1954 to 1957 aspects of car­ on carrot flowers, can set a substan­ F rot pollination were studied at tial amount of seed, although not Logan, Utah. The results of the work nearly as much as the larger Diptera in 1954 were reported by Hawthorn and Hymenoptera. Seed yields were et aU The present paper discusses satisfactory in the open plots, but the occurrence and pollinating effi­ slightly better in plots caged with ciency of the many species of insects colonies of honey bees. In subsequent that visited flowers on the open plots years results of the first year were each year. generally substantiated. However, in That insect pollination is necessary 1957, when insect populations in the for satisfactory yields of carrot seed open plots were much lower than was clearly demonstrated by the work previously, there was a large gap be­ in 1954. It was also shown that tiny tween the yields in the open plots Diptera, which are usually abundant and those caged with honey bees. DESCRIPTION OF AREA HE work was carried on at three suburban development. In 1955 the T locations near Logan, each of­ plots were a mile farther east, more fering diverse habitats, for insects. isolated from the alkaline areas, and In 1954 and 1956 the plots were lo­ surrounded by alfalfa, grain, small cated a mile north of Logan, where orchards, and sagebrush. In 1957 the the surrounding land is used prin­ plots were a few miles south of Lo­ cipally for dairying; to the west there gan, where the surrounding land is were several artesian springs and more intensely farmed and the foot­ alkaline meadows and hummocks, hills and orchard areas are farther and to the east foothills with sage­ away than in the previous locations. brush, small orchards, and scattered CHARACTERISTICS OF CARROT FLOWERS ARROT pollen is abundant and accessible to all insects except those C readily accessible to all visitors. with long, slender tongues. The in­ Carrot nectar is not abundant but it dividual florets are tiny and easily is exposed on the petals and readily worked by minute insects. At the same time they are aggregated into 1 L. R. Hawhom, C. E. Bohart, and E. H. flat, compact heads affording support Toole. Carrot seed vield andgermina­ to larger insects. .It is not surprising, tion as affected by different levels of in­ therefore, that a diverse assemblage sect pollination. Amer. Soc. Hort.· Sci. Proc. 67:384-389. 1956. of insects is attracted to the flowers. -3- VARIETY AND ABUNDANCE OF POLLINATORS s indicated in the accompanying the same location and year. The 25 A list, 334 species of insects rep­ most abundant species in order of resenting 71 families were collected their abundance each year are shown on the carrot blossoms in the open in table 1. Except in 1957, the small plots and on small adjacent plantings syrphid fly, Syritta pipiens (L.), was used for other types of studies. Most by far the most numerous. The vari­ of the species were scarce or trans­ able populations of the other species ient and individually contributed from year to year illustrate how futile little pollination, although they ac­ it would be to count on consistent counted for a substantial percentage pollination by anyone species. Many of the total pollination. of the more abundant Diptera breed As might be expected, the different in wet and decaying vegetable mat­ species varied greatly in abundance ter. The availability of this material from location to location, from year varied greatly from place to place to year, and from week to week at and season to season, depending upon Table 1. Populations 0/ the 25 most abundant species 0/ insects on carrot flowers 0/ the open plots, Logan, Utah, (number per plot per observation) * Species 1954 1955 4 1956 1957 Average Syritta pipiens ......................... .478 274.0 264.0 11 257 Piophila casei .......................... 304 3.2 62.0 0 92 Hippodamia spp. ................... 14 1.8 0.5 283 75 Chrysomyza demandata ............ 270 12.7 2.4 0 71 Madiza glabra .......................... 168 18.6 95.4 0 71 Dasyhelea spp . .......................... 168 0.0 87.2 0 64 Leptocoris trivittatus
Recommended publications
  • Diptera) of North-Eastern North America
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e36673 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e36673 Taxonomic Paper New Syrphidae (Diptera) of North-eastern North America Jeffrey H. Skevington‡,§, Andrew D. Young|, Michelle M. Locke‡, Kevin M. Moran‡,§ ‡ AAFC, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Canada § Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada | California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, United States of America Corresponding author: Jeffrey H. Skevington ([email protected]) Academic editor: Torsten Dikow Received: 31 May 2019 | Accepted: 09 Aug 2019 | Published: 03 Sep 2019 Citation: Skevington JH, Young AD, Locke MM, Moran KM (2019) New Syrphidae (Diptera) of North-eastern North America. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e36673. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e36673 ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:823430AD-B648-414F-A8B2-4F1E5F1A086A Abstract Background This paper describes 11 of 18 new species recognised in the recent book, "Field Guide to the Flower Flies of Northeastern North America". Four species are omitted as they need to be described in the context of a revision (three Cheilosia and a Palpada species) and three other species (one Neoascia and two Xylota) will be described by F. Christian Thompson in a planned publication. Six of the new species have been recognised for decades and were treated by J. Richard Vockeroth in unpublished notes or by Thompson in his unpublished but widely distributed "A conspectus of the flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of the Nearctic Region". Five of the 11 species were discovered during the preparation of the Field Guide. Eight of the 11 have DNA barcodes available that support the morphology. New information New species treated in this paper include: Anasimyia diffusa Locke, Skevington and Vockeroth (Smooth-legged Swamp Fly), Anasimyia matutina Locke, Skevington and This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
    [Show full text]
  • THIS PUBLICATION IS out of DATE. for Most Current Information
    The Pear Psylla in Oregon DATE. U OF := ls72 OREGONLIBRARY STATEOUTL UNIVERSITY r IS ti information:Technical Bulletin 122 PUBLICATIONcurrent most THIS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT For STATION Oregon State University http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalogCorvallis, Oregon November 1972 CONTENTS Abstract--------------------------- Introduction--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------------3 Psylla Injury to Pear------------------------------- ----- ------------------------- 5 Pear Decline------------------------- --------------------------------------------- 5 Psylla Toxin--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Psylla Honeydew______________--_ -------------------------------------------------------_______-_-___ 6 PsyllaDensities and Economic Losses____-__-____ _____-_--_____-__-__ 7 Biology------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Life History--------------------------------- - DATE. 7 Number of Generations-----------------------------------------------------------------------9 Host Range----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OF 9 Control------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 Natural Control-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OUT 10 Chemical Control------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------14
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-National Conservation of Alligator Lizards
    MULTI-NATIONAL CONSERVATION OF ALLIGATOR LIZARDS: APPLIED SOCIOECOLOGICAL LESSONS FROM A FLAGSHIP GROUP by ADAM G. CLAUSE (Under the Direction of John Maerz) ABSTRACT The Anthropocene is defined by unprecedented human influence on the biosphere. Integrative conservation recognizes this inextricable coupling of human and natural systems, and mobilizes multiple epistemologies to seek equitable, enduring solutions to complex socioecological issues. Although a central motivation of global conservation practice is to protect at-risk species, such organisms may be the subject of competing social perspectives that can impede robust interventions. Furthermore, imperiled species are often chronically understudied, which prevents the immediate application of data-driven quantitative modeling approaches in conservation decision making. Instead, real-world management goals are regularly prioritized on the basis of expert opinion. Here, I explore how an organismal natural history perspective, when grounded in a critique of established human judgements, can help resolve socioecological conflicts and contextualize perceived threats related to threatened species conservation and policy development. To achieve this, I leverage a multi-national system anchored by a diverse, enigmatic, and often endangered New World clade: alligator lizards. Using a threat analysis and status assessment, I show that one recent petition to list a California alligator lizard, Elgaria panamintina, under the US Endangered Species Act often contradicts the best available science.
    [Show full text]
  • André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Journal of Entomology
    Norwegian Journal of Entomology Volume 47 No. 1 • 2000 Published by the Norwegian Entomological Society Oslo and Stavanger NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY A continuation of Fauna Norvegica Serie B (1979-1998), Norwegian Journal ofEntomology (1975­ 1978) and Norsk Entomologisk TIdsskrift (1921-1974). Published by The Norwegian Entomological Society (Norsk entomologisk forening). Norwegian Journal of Entomology publishes original papers and reviews on taxonomy, faunistics, zoogeography, general and applied ecology of insects and related terrestrial arthropods. Short com­ munications, e.g. less than two printed pages, are also considered. Manuscripts should be sent to the editor. Editor Lauritz S~mme, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1050 Blindem, N-03l6 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected]. Editorial secretary Lars Ove Hansen, Zoological Museum, University of Oslo, Sarsgate 1, N-0562 Oslo. E-mail: [email protected]. Editorial board Ame C. Nilssen, Troms~ John O. Solem, Trondheim Uta Greve Jensen, Bergen Knut Rognes, Stavanger Ame Fjellberg, Tj~me The goal of The Norwegian Entomological Society is to encourage the study of entomology in Norway and to provide a meeting place for those who are interested in the field. Annual membership fees are NOK 200 Guniors NOK 100) for members with addresses in Norway, and NOK 220 (Juniors NOK 110) for members abroad. Inquiries about membership should be sent to the secretary: Jan A. Stenl~kk, P.O.Box 386, N-4oo2 Stavanger. Norway. E-mail: [email protected]. Norsk entomologisk forening (NEF) ser som sin oppgave afremme det entomologiske studium i Norge, og danne et bindeledd mellom de interesserte.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipterists Digest
    ipterists Digest Dipterists’ Digest is a popular journal aimed primarily at field dipterists in the UK, Ireland and adjacent countries, with interests in recording, ecology, natural history, conservation and identification of British and NW European flies. Articles may be of any length up to 3000 words. Items exceeding this length may be serialised or printed in full, depending on the competition for space. They should be in clear concise English, preferably typed double spaced on one side of A4 paper. Only scientific names should be underlined- Tables should be on separate sheets. Figures drawn in clear black ink. about twice their printed size and lettered clearly. Enquiries about photographs and colour plates — please contact the Production Editor in advance as a charge may be made. References should follow the layout in this issue. Initially the scope of Dipterists' Digest will be:- — Observations of interesting behaviour, ecology, and natural history. — New and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.), — The conservation of flies and their habitats. — Provisional and interim reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including provisional and preliminary maps. — Records of new or scarce species for regions, counties, districts etc. — Local faunal accounts, field meeting results, and ‘holiday lists' with good ecological information/interpretation. — Notes on identification, additions, deletions and amendments to standard key works and checklists. — News of new publications/references/iiterature scan. Texts concerned with the Diptera of parts of continental Europe adjacent to the British Isles will also be considered for publication, if submitted in English. Dipterists Digest No.1 1988 E d ite d b y : Derek Whiteley Published by: Derek Whiteley - Sheffield - England for the Diptera Recording Scheme assisted by the Irish Wildlife Service ISSN 0953-7260 Printed by Higham Press Ltd., New Street, Shirland, Derby DE5 6BP s (0773) 832390.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Genus Larrisson Menke, 1967, and Description of the New Genus Larrissa (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae)
    JHR 25: 35–82A review (2012) of the genus Larrisson Menke, 1967, and description of the new genus Larrissa... 35 doi: 10.3897/JHR.25.2396 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoft.net/journals/jhr A review of the genus Larrisson Menke, 1967, and description of the new genus Larrissa (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae) Wojciech J. Pulawski† Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:ADB010F9-1DB3-4FA5-BEB5-6716AB2E0ED4 Corresponding author: Wojciech J. Pulawski ([email protected]) Academic editor: Stefan Schmidt | Received 20 November 2011 | Accepted 15 December 2012 | Published 23 March 2012 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB6375D0-B9C1-448F-BE35-2EF89EECA8E9 Citation: Pulawski WJ (2012) A review of the genus Larrisson Menke, 1967, and description of the new genus Larrissa (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 25: 35–82. doi: 10.3897/JHR.25.2396 Abstract Larrisson menkei Pagliano, 1995, is transferred to Clitemnestra comb. n. and twelve new species of Larris- son are described: armatus, carinatus, latifrons, niger, orbitalis, punctatus, quintus, spinosus, sulcatus, tegula- ris, tibialis, and variegatus, all from Australia. Based on a cladistic analysis of the genus, Larrisson nedymus Menke is transferred to Larrissa gen. n. Additional locality records are provided for Larrisson abnormis Turner, azyx Menke, rieki Menke, and for Larrissa nedyma (Menke). An updated key to the species of Larrisson and Larrissa is provided. Keywords Taxonomy, revision, Larrisson, new genus, Larrissa Introduction Larrisson is a little known, rarely collected, strictly Australian genus of the solitary wasp family Crabronidae. It was established for Sericophorus abnormis Turner, 1914 by Menke (1967) who in 1979 added three new species, revised the genus, and provided a key to their identification.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Cochlochila Bullita Stal As Potential Pest of Orthosiphon Aristatus (Blume) Miq
    UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA BIOLOGY OF COCHLOCHILA BULLITA STAL AS POTENTIAL PEST OF ORTHOSIPHON ARISTATUS (BLUME) MIQ. IN MALAYSIA UPM TAN LI PENG COPYRIGHT © FH 2014 2 BIOLOGY OF Cochlochila bullita (STÅL) (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE), A POTENTIAL PEST OF Orthosiphon aristatus (BLUME) MIQ. (LAMIALES: LAMIACEAE) IN MALAYSIA UPM By TAN LI PENG Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, in Fulfilment to the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2014 COPYRIGHT © COPYRIGHT All material contained within the thesis, including without limitation text, logos, icons, photographs and all other artwork, is copyright material of Universiti Putra Malaysia unless otherwise stated. Use may be made of any material contained within the thesis for non-commercial purposes from the copyright holder. Commercial use of material may only be made with the express, prior, written permission of Universiti Putra Malaysia. Copyright © Universiti Putra Malaysia UPM COPYRIGHT © Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy BIOLOGY OF Cochlochila bullita (STÅL) (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE), A POTENTIAL PEST OF Orthosiphon aristatus (BLUME) MIQ. (LAMIALES: LAMIACEAE) IN MALAYSIA By TAN LI PENG July 2014 Chairman: Prof. Ahmad Said Sajap, PhD UPM Faculty: Forestry Cochlochila bullita (Stål) is an importance pest in some Asia countries such as India, Kanpur and Thailand attacking plants form the genus Ocimum, herein its common name, ocimum tingid. Cochlochila bullita is first recorded in Malaysia in the year 2009, attacking one of the important medicinal herbs in this country, the Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. Biology of this pest was studied to get a deeper understanding of this bug associated with O.
    [Show full text]
  • Disturbance and Recovery in a Changing World; 2006 June 6–8; Cedar City, UT
    Reproductive Biology of Larrea tridentata: A Preliminary Comparison Between Core Shrubland and Isolated Grassland Plants at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico Rosemary L. Pendleton, Burton K. Pendleton, Karen R. Wetherill, and Terry Griswold Abstract—Expansion of diploid creosote shrubs (Larrea tridentata Introduction_______________________ (Sessé & Moc. ex DC.) Coville)) into grassland sites occurs exclusively through seed production. We compared the reproductive biology Chihuahuan Desert shrubland is expanding into semiarid of Larrea shrubs located in a Chihuahuan desert shrubland with grasslands of the Southwest. Creosote (Larrea tridentata) isolated shrubs well-dispersed into the semiarid grasslands at the seedling establishment in grasslands is a key factor in this Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge. Specifically, we examined (1) re- conversion. Diploid Larrea plants of the Chihuahuan Des- productive success on open-pollinated branches, (2) the potential ert are not clonal as has been reported for some hexaploid of individual shrubs to self-pollinate, and (3) bee pollinator guild Mojave populations (Vasek 1980). Consequently, Larrea composition at shrubland and grassland sites. Sampling of the bee guild suggests that there are adequate numbers of pollinators at establishment in semiarid grasslands of New Mexico must both locations; however, the community composition differs between occur exclusively through seed. At McKenzie Flats in the shrub and grassland sites. More Larrea specialist bee species were Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, there exists a gradient found at the shrubland site as compared with the isolated shrubs. in Larrea density stretching from dense Larrea shrubland Large numbers of generalist bees were found on isolated grassland (4,000 to 6,000 plants per hectare) to semiarid desert grass- bushes, but their efficiency in pollinating Larrea is currently un- land with only a few scattered shrubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Colletidae): Emerging Patterns from the Southern End of the World Eduardo A
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2011) ORIGINAL Biogeography and diversification of ARTICLE colletid bees (Hymenoptera: Colletidae): emerging patterns from the southern end of the world Eduardo A. B. Almeida1,2*, Marcio R. Pie3, Sea´n G. Brady4 and Bryan N. Danforth2 1Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de ABSTRACT Filosofia, Cieˆncias e Letras, Universidade de Aim The evolutionary history of bees is presumed to extend back in time to the Sa˜o Paulo, Ribeira˜o Preto, SP 14040-901, Brazil, 2Department of Entomology, Comstock Early Cretaceous. Among all major clades of bees, Colletidae has been a prime Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, example of an ancient group whose Gondwanan origin probably precedes the USA, 3Departamento de Zoologia, complete break-up of Africa, Antarctica, Australia and South America, because Universidade Federal do Parana´, Curitiba, PR modern lineages of this family occur primarily in southern continents. In this paper, 81531-990, Brazil, 4Department of we aim to study the temporal and spatial diversification of colletid bees to better Entomology, National Museum of Natural understand the processes that have resulted in the present southern disjunctions. History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, Location Southern continents. DC 20560, USA Methods We assembled a dataset comprising four nuclear genes of a broad sample of Colletidae. We used Bayesian inference analyses to estimate the phylogenetic tree topology and divergence times. Biogeographical relationships were investigated using event-based analytical methods: a Bayesian approach to dispersal–vicariance analysis, a likelihood-based dispersal–extinction– cladogenesis model and a Bayesian model. We also used lineage through time analyses to explore the tempo of radiations of Colletidae and their context in the biogeographical history of these bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Pollinator Garden for Native Specialist Bees of New York and the Northeast
    Creating a pollinator garden for native specialist bees of New York and the Northeast Maria van Dyke Kristine Boys Rosemarie Parker Robert Wesley Bryan Danforth From Cover Photo: Additional species not readily visible in photo - Baptisia australis, Cornus sp., Heuchera americana, Monarda didyma, Phlox carolina, Solidago nemoralis, Solidago sempervirens, Symphyotrichum pilosum var. pringlii. These shade-loving species are in a nearby bed. Acknowledgements This project was supported by the NYS Natural Heritage Program under the NYS Pollinator Protection Plan and Environmental Protection Fund. In addition, we offer our appreciation to Jarrod Fowler for his research into compiling lists of specialist bees and their host plants in the eastern United States. Creating a Pollinator Garden for Specialist Bees in New York Table of Contents Introduction _________________________________________________________________________ 1 Native bees and plants _________________________________________________________________ 3 Nesting Resources ____________________________________________________________________ 3 Planning your garden __________________________________________________________________ 4 Site assessment and planning: ____________________________________________________ 5 Site preparation: _______________________________________________________________ 5 Design: _______________________________________________________________________ 6 Soil: _________________________________________________________________________ 6 Sun Exposure: _________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]