DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sacred Depths of Nature an Ontology of the Possible in the Philosophy of Peirce and Heidegger

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sacred Depths of Nature an Ontology of the Possible in the Philosophy of Peirce and Heidegger THE SACRED DEPTHS OF NATURE AN ONTOLOGY OF THE POSSIBLE IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PEIRCE AND HEIDEGGER by Leon J. Niemoczynski B.A., East Stroudsburg University, 2001 M.A., West Chester University, 2004 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2009 Copyright by LEON NIEMOCZYNSKI, 2009 All Rights Reserved DISSERTATION APPROVAL THE SACRED DEPTHS OF NATURE: AN ONTOLOGY OF THE POSSIBLE IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PEIRCE AND HEIDEGGER By Leon J. Niemoczynski A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Philosophy Approved by: Douglas R. Anderson, Chair Doug Berger Jed Delahoussaye Lenore Langsdorf Ken Stikkers Martin Weatherston Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................i DEDICATION .............................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................iv CHAPTERS CHAPTER 1 – A PEIRCEAN PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION I. Introduction A. Summary of argument....................................................................................1 B. Scope of project..............................................................................................8 II. Conceptual Background A. The category of Firstness and related perspectives......................................12 B. The categories and “the divine life” ............................................................13 C. The divine as a vague idea ...........................................................................17 D. The categories and the sacred: Firstness-feeling..........................................18 E. The categories and the divine life: Firstness-possibility...............................20 III. Peirce’s Philosophy of Religion: A Review of the Literature A. Two current perspectives on Peirce’s philosophy of religion: Theosemiotic (Hegel, Scholasticism) or Ecstatic Naturalism (Schelling, speculative metaphysics) .....................................................................................................26 B. Ecstatic Naturalism’s view on Peirce’s philosophy of religion....................28 IV. Methodology and Perspective: Ecstatic Naturalism and Contemporary Philosophy A. Nature and kinds of naturalism ...................................................................29 B. Definition of Ecstatic Naturalism.................................................................35 C. Ecstatic Naturalism and contemporary philosophy......................................38 D. The “ground” of disclosure for the divine life .............................................45 V. Organization of Chapters .............................................................................48 CHAPTER 2 – THE EVOLVING COSMOS I. Categories A. Doctrine of the categories ............................................................................62 B. Phenomenology: categories are elements of phenomena.............................65 C. Ontology-cosmology: categories are modes of being ..................................71 II. Doctrine of the Categories: Phenomenology A. Peirce’s idea of phenomenology ..................................................................73 B. Ordinal phenomenology in the perspective of Ecstatic Naturalism .............77 III. An Ontology of Possibility A. Reality: actual and possible..........................................................................82 B. Possibility: its concept and mode .................................................................86 C. The function of possibility in the divine life ................................................90 IV. Peirce’s “Cosmotheism”: Ontology and Cosmology A. Midworld and horizons, past and future ......................................................94 B. The continuum of nature: convergence of mind...........................................97 C. Pantheism or panentheism?........................................................................111 D. Nature and its orders: the depths of Firstness ............................................114 CHAPTER 3 – ABDUCTION AND THE ECSTATIC EVENT I. Abduction A. Abduction defined......................................................................................130 B. Abduction and induction ............................................................................136 C. Pierce’s theory of logic: abduction belongs to a lived process of inquiry..139 D Pierice’s theory of reasoning: abduction and its religious implications......144 II. Firstness and the Inquiring Organism A. Firstness-feeling defined ............................................................................152 B. Firstness-feeling disturbed: the origins of universe-wide mentality ..........154 III. Attuning to Nature’s Mind A. Irritation, doubt, and belief at the level of feeling .....................................164 B. Sedimented belief and the force of experience breaking up belief.............168 IV. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument”: Opening a Sacred Dimension of Human Experience A. The “Neglected Argument”: its history and structure................................174 B. Religious thinking and scientific inquiry share a common form of inference .........................................................................................................................177 C. Numinous feeling: a sacred dimension of human experience....................182 V. Abduction and the Ecstatic Event A. Finite before the Infinite.............................................................................190 B. Peirce’s Transcendentalism........................................................................193 C. Hypothesis confirmation as an ecstatic event.............................................196 VI. Realizing the Mind of God: The Religious Significance of the Community of Inquiry.............................................................................................................201 CHAPTER 4 – THE SACRED DEPTHS OF NATURE I. The Schelling Connection A. Schelling’s influence on Peirce..................................................................217 B. Schelling’s influence on Heidegger............................................................223 II. Heidegger’s 1936 Lecture on Schelling: Its Importance for Understanding Peircean Firstness A. Schelling’s idea of freedom and the indeterminate ground of Firstness....231 B. “Groundless ground” [ Abgrund ] and the ontological difference ..............240 C. Ground for transcendence: possibility........................................................251 III. The Sacred Depths of Nature A. Schelling’s philosophy of nature................................................................256 B. Schelling’s first divine potential and Peircean Firstness............................262 IV. Conclusion: Peirce from a Heideggerean Angle of Vision A. Nature and Beyng’s essential sway............................................................267 B. Receptivity: the poet and the scientist........................................................275 BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................................287 AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF LEON NIEMOCZYNSKI, for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in Philosophy, presented on December 5th, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: THE SACRED DEPTHS OF NATURE: AN ONTOLOGY OF THE POSSIBLE IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PEIRCE AND HEIDEGGER MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr. Douglas R. Anderson This dissertation carries out a study of the American pragmaticist C.S. Peirce and constructively applies his thought to a religious understanding of nature called “ecstatic naturalism,” a philosophy developed by Robert S. Corrington that conjoins American pragmatism and Continental phenomenology. In this project I explore how the modality of possibility functions in the disclosure of a “divine life,” that is, the life of a developing cosmos taken to be sacred in its continual processes of evolutionary growth and transformation. Possibility, found in Peirce’s category of experience known as “Firstness,” provides organisms with the ontological conditions required for any immediately felt qualitative experience—experience that is the site for potential religious experience. “Religious” experience here means the ecstatic contraposition of finite being before “infinite” being. I consider infinite being first as an honorific sheer availability of being (potential or possible being: becoming ) and then in terms of how inquiry may reveal nature to be an encompassing infinite that locates and situates finite organisms. It is my thesis that, as it is found in Peirce’s category of Firstness, possibility serves as a ground for the disclosure of this infinite, “the divine life,” by enabling its presence to come forward as a feeling of the sacred — a feeling found when inquirers muse over nature and establish beliefs about the universe in which they are situated. To the end of i making these claims more concrete, I draw on figures such as the German existential phenomenologist Martin Heidegger, and the German idealist F.W.J. Schelling so as to identify
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development of Dr. Alfred North Whitehead's Philosophy Frederick Joseph Parker
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 1936 The development of Dr. Alfred North Whitehead's philosophy Frederick Joseph Parker Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Parker, Frederick Joseph, "The development of Dr. Alfred North Whitehead's philosophy" (1936). Master's Theses. Paper 912. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. mE Dt:VEto!l..mm oa llS. At..~"1lr:D !JG'lt'fR ~!EREAli •a MiILOSO?ll' A. thesis SUbm1tte4 to the Gradus:te i'acnl ty in cana1:.at1: f!Jr tbe degree of llaste,-. of Arts Univerait7 of !llcuor.&a Jnno 1936 PREF!~CE The modern-·wr1 ter in the field of Philosophy no doubt recognises the ilfficulty of gaining an ndequate and impartial hearing from the students of his own generation. It seems that one only becomes great at tbe expense of deatb. The university student is often tempted to close his study of philosophy- after Plato alld Aristotle as if the final word has bean said. The writer of this paper desires to know somethi~g about the contribution of the model~n school of phiiiosophers. He has chosen this particular study because he believes that Dr. \i'hi tehesa bas given a very thoughtful interpretation of the universe .. This paper is in no way a substitute for a first-hand study of the works of Whitehead.
    [Show full text]
  • Varieties of Religious Naturalism
    Varieties of Religious Naturalism Wesley J. Wildman — Boston University — Spring 2010 — STH TT861/TT961 Course Description The aim of this course is learn about varieties of religious naturalism and how they have been, and can be, incorporated into philosophical and theological reflection. The seminar will read a variety of works in contemporary religious naturalism, from twentieth-century classics to current contributions, and from theoretical analyses of the meaning of naturalism to surveys attempting to map out the territory of plausible viewpoints. We will also track the close relationship between religious naturalism and both ecologically-rooted forms of spirituality and nature-centered forms of mysticism. The class is intended for advanced masters students and doctoral candidates interested in contemporary forms of philosophical and theological reflection on nature and God, and in forms of spirituality rooted in the natural world. Students registered at the 900-level have readings and a bibliographic task to complete over and above the obligations of students registered at the 800-level. Classes will meet once a week on Wednesdays from 8:00 to 11:00 in STH 319. Each class will be conducted in the seminar discussion format with lectures given by the instructor as needed or requested. The 800-level version of this course counts (1) as an MTS Core Concentration course for Science and Religion, for Theology, and for Area B; and (2) as an MDiv Theology 3 Core Elective. It may also count (3) as a requirement for a BTI Certificate program in science and religion. The main product of the course will be a research paper on some aspect of the course material, topic to be approved in advance by the instructor (50%; 3,000 words for 800-level students, 5,000 words for 900-level students).
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry
    Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry Jaap van Brakel Abstract: In this paper I assess the relation between philosophy of chemistry and (general) philosophy of science, focusing on those themes in the philoso- phy of chemistry that may bring about major revisions or extensions of cur- rent philosophy of science. Three themes can claim to make a unique contri- bution to philosophy of science: first, the variety of materials in the (natural and artificial) world; second, extending the world by making new stuff; and, third, specific features of the relations between chemistry and physics. Keywords : philosophy of science, philosophy of chemistry, interdiscourse relations, making stuff, variety of substances . 1. Introduction Chemistry is unique and distinguishes itself from all other sciences, with respect to three broad issues: • A (variety of) stuff perspective, requiring conceptual analysis of the notion of stuff or material (Sections 4 and 5). • A making stuff perspective: the transformation of stuff by chemical reaction or phase transition (Section 6). • The pivotal role of the relations between chemistry and physics in connection with the question how everything fits together (Section 7). All themes in the philosophy of chemistry can be classified in one of these three clusters or make contributions to general philosophy of science that, as yet , are not particularly different from similar contributions from other sci- ences (Section 3). I do not exclude the possibility of there being more than three clusters of philosophical issues unique to philosophy of chemistry, but I am not aware of any as yet. Moreover, highlighting the issues discussed in Sections 5-7 does not mean that issues reviewed in Section 3 are less im- portant in revising the philosophy of science.
    [Show full text]
  • God and Universal Value Commensurability Yujin Nagasawa
    God and Universal Value Commensurability Yujin Nagasawa Department of Philosophy, University of Birmingham, UK [email protected] A first draft. Please do not quote. 1. Introduction In the eleventh century Anselm introduced a concept of God that is now widely accepted among Judaeo-Christian-Islamic theists: that than which no greater can be thought.1 Anselm presented primarily two applications of this concept: (i) We can construct the ontological argument for the existence of God from this concept; (ii) we can derive from this concept the proposition that God has such individual attributes as omniscience, omnipotence and omnibenevolence. Over the last nine hundred years philosophers have concentrated on these applications of the Anselmian concept of God. As to (i), they have tried to examine the cogency of the ontological argument. Some have attempted, in particular, to construct objections to the argument and some have tried to defend or improve on it. As to (ii), philosophers have tried to analyse the concepts of omniscience, omnipotence and omnibenevolence. Some have tried, in particular, to provide proper formulations of these attributes and some have tried to show the incoherence of and inconsistency between these attributes. Ironically, however, philosophers have rarely examined in detail the Anselmian concept of God itself. In exactly what sense is God that than which no greater can be thought? The most intuitive response to this question is to say that God is that than which no greater can be thought by virtue of occupying the top link in the ‘great chain of being’, a 1 Anselm, Proslogion, in M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Macondo Time: on Alejandro Vallega's Latin American
    Macondo Time: On Alejandro Vallega’s Latin American Philosophy. From Identity to Radical Exteriority by Eduardo Mendieta Macondo Time: On Alejandro Vallega’s Latin American Philosophy. From Identity to Radical Exteriority by Eduardo Mendieta Alejandro Vallega’s Latin American Philosophy. From Identity to Radical Exteriority is an important contribution to the study of Latin American philosophy in the last half a century, more or less. While Vallega begins with Simon Bolivar’s famous “Jamaica Letter” from 1815, which he pairs with Leopoldo Zea’s writings on Latin American thought from the 1940s onwards, his focus is on the last twenty years of Latin American philosophical production. In fact, it can be said that Vallega is distinctly interested in the relationship between the philosophy of liberation, as it developed in the early seventies out of the debates among Zea, Bondy, and Dussel, and the more recent developments of what had been called decolonial thought in Quijano, Dussel, Mignolo, Lugones, Maldonado-Torres, and Castro-Gómez. The merit of Vallega’s book is that he sets out to map these developments and to bring us to date in the latest debates within a certain strain of Latin American philosophical thinking. The other merit of Vallega’s book is that he argues for what he calls a decolonial Latin American aesthetics that would begin from the radical exteriority of the Latin American experience that is framed by what he calls ana-chronic temporalities and their inspired sensibilities. Alejandro Vallega’s book, however, is not a history of Latin American philosophy in the last few decades, but an interpretation of a group of key figures.
    [Show full text]
  • “Grounding and Omniscience” (PDF)
    Grounding and Omniscience Abstract I’m going to argue that omniscience is impossible and therefore that there is no God.1 The argument turns on the notion of grounding. After illustrating and clarifying that notion, I’ll start the argument in earnest. The first step will be to lay out five claims, one of which is the claim that there is an omniscient being, and the other four of which are claims about grounding. I’ll prove that these five claims are inconsistent. Then I’ll argue for the truth of each of them except the claim that there is an omniscient being. From these arguments it follows that there are no omniscient beings and thus that there is no God. §1. Stage Setting The best way to get a grip on the notion of grounding – or more exactly, for our purposes, the notion of partial grounding - is by considering examples. (By “partial grounding” I mean “at-least-partial grounding”, just as mereologists mean “at-least-part of” by “part of”.) The first example hearkens back to Plato’s Euthyphro. Suppose that a theorist claims that as a matter of metaphysical necessity, a given act is morally right if and only if it is approved of by God. At first blush at least, it is plausible that this theorist owes us an answer to following question: when acts are right, are they right because God approves of them, or does he approve of them because they are right? We all understand this question right away, right when we first hear it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implications of Naturalism As an Educational Philosophy in Jordan from the Perspectives of Childhood Education Teachers
    Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.7, No.11, 2016 The Implications of Naturalism as an Educational Philosophy in Jordan from the Perspectives of Childhood Education Teachers Omar Khasawneh Ahmed Khaled Mohammad Al Momani Al Ain University of Science and Technology Al Ain, United Arab Emirates & Yarmouk University- Jordan Abstract The purpose of this study was to identify the educational implications of naturalism as an educational philosophy from the Jordanian childhood education teachers' perspectives. Each philosophy simply represents a unique conviction concerning the nature of the teaching/learning process. This study could serve as a grounded theory for Jordanian childhood teachers to comprehend the need for a clear educational philosophy within the Jordanian educational system. In addition, this research study would draw Jordanian childhood teachers' interest to be acquainted more with the educational principles of such philosophical theory. The researchers employed a questionnaire consisted of twenty one items, which correspond to the educational principles of naturalism. The quantitative approach is used to gather data as one of the techniques and descriptive due to its suitability for this study. The study findings revealed that Jordanian childhood education teachers' perspectives toward the implications of naturalism as an educational philosophy were positive for all domains; curriculum, aims, and activities. Based on the findings, the researchers provided some relevant recommendations. Keywords : Naturalism, Educational Philosophy, Childhood Education Teachers, Jordan. 1. Introduction Teachers’ educational philosophies and their value systems influence their teaching styles and the way they deal with their students. So, the impact of teachers’ beliefs and values on teaching and learning is evident in each classroom (Conti, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • A Deep Network for Nychthemeron Cloud Image Segmentation
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XX 2019 1 CloudSegNet: A Deep Network for Nychthemeron Cloud Image Segmentation Soumyabrata Dev, Member, IEEE, Atul Nautiyal, Yee Hui Lee, Senior Member, IEEE, and Stefan Winkler, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—We analyze clouds in the earth’s atmosphere using Most of the related works in cloud segmentation work on ground-based sky cameras. An accurate segmentation of clouds daytime images and use a combination of red and blue color in the captured sky/cloud image is difficult, owing to the fuzzy channels. We have previously conducted a thorough analysis boundaries of clouds. Several techniques have been proposed that use color as the discriminatory feature for cloud detection. In the of color spaces and components used in cloud detection [8]. existing literature, however, analysis of daytime and nighttime A few techniques for nighttime sky/cloud image segmentation images is considered separately, mainly because of differences in techniques have also been developed [9], [10]. However, image characteristics and applications. In this paper, we propose none of them have been designed for or tested on sky/cloud a light-weight deep-learning architecture called CloudSegNet. It images taken during both daytime and nighttime. This poses is the first that integrates daytime and nighttime (also known as nychthemeron) image segmentation in a single framework, and an engineering problem when implementing a time-agnostic achieves state-of-the-art results on public databases. imaging solution in the on-board hardware of the sky camera. Therefore, it is important to develop a sky/cloud segmenta- Index Terms—Cloud segmentation, whole sky imager, nychthe- meron, deep learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Academics No Longer Think: How the Neoliberalization Of
    ACADEMICS NO LONGER THINK: HOW THE NEOLIBERALIZATION OF ACADEMIA LEADS TO THOUGHTLESSNESS by JUSTIN MICAH PACK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Philosophy and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Justin Micah Pack Title: Academics No Longer Think: How the Neoliberalization of Academia Leads to Thoughtlessness This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Philosophy by: Bonnie Mann Chairperson Alejandro Vallega Core Member Rocío Zambrana Core Member Jerry Roziek Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded December 2015 ii © 2015 Justin Micah Pack iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Justin Micah Pack Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy December 2015 Title: Academics No Longer Think: How the Neoliberalization of Academia Leads to Thoughtlessness In my dissertation, I argue that the neoliberalization of higher education results in the university becoming less and less a place of wonder, self-cultivation and thinking and instead more and more a place to specialize, strategize and produce. This is a result of the volatile infusion and mixing of the logic of calculative rationality at work in consumer capitalism with the logic of scientific instrumental rationality already hegemonic in academia. This adds to the demands of the academic world of production the demands of the world of consumption. Now the academic (and also the student) is interpellated not only as a producer of knowledge but also as an object of consumption (to be consumed by others).
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalistic Theism Teed Rockwell
    Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 25.2 (2017) 209–220 ISSN 1522-7340 (print) ISSN 2052-8388 (online) https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.34830 Naturalistic Theism Teed Rockwell Sonoma State University [email protected] Abstract Many modern theological debates are built around a false dichotomy between 1) an atheism which asserts that the universe was created by purposeless me- chanical processes and 2) acceptance of a religious system which requires both faith in the infallibility of sacred texts and belief in a supernatural God. I propose a form of naturalistic theism, which rejects sacred texts as unjustified, and supernaturalism as incoherent. I argue that rejecting these two elements of traditional organized religion would have a strongly positive impact on the beliefs and practices of religion, even though many religious people feel strongly attached to them. It is belief in sacred texts that is responsible for most of the evil done in the name of religion, not belief in God. Many of the strongest arguments for atheism work only against a supernatural God, and have no impact on the question of the existence of a natural God. Keywords atheism, theism, agnosticism, naturalism, supernaturalism, sacred text, Shook, Dennett, Dawkins, Kuhn, Quine, Neurath, Koran, Bible, Islam, Buddhism, omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, miracles, Marxist atheism I agree with many of the criticisms of established religions voiced by promi- nent Atheists. That is why the only form of Theism I could accept would be what I call Naturalistic Theism. For many Atheists, this will appear to be a contradiction in terms, but I will argue that this kind of theism is as com- patible with science as nondogmatic Atheism.1 As far as I can tell, Natural- istic Theism is essentially identical to what John Shook calls either Religious 1.
    [Show full text]
  • John William Miller and the Ontology of the Midworld by Robert S
    John William Miller and the Ontology of the Midworld by Robert S. Corrington (Posted with the permission of the Charles S. Peirce Society and Robert S. Corrington. The essay originally appeared, in a slightly different form, in the Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 22 [1986]: 165- 188. The pagination of this version does not conform to the pagination of the original document.) One curious feature of the American philosophical tradition is its ability to sustain and nurture fundamental reflection in an age in which such thinking is held to be antediluvian. The flood waters of scepticism and deconstruction seem to have rendered general categorical reflection powerless. Any talk about nature or world strikes contemporary fashion as a throwback to a pre-critical era in which philosophers naively trusted in their ability to overcome the imperial projections of a self which was unable, because of its fragmented state, to justify such projections. To attempt to reflect outside of the paradigm of the text is to evidence a serious insensitivity to the hermeneutic turn which has supposedly swept all historical debris from its path. The felony is compounded when it is asserted that the tradition of metaphysics has deposited recognizable and vigorous outcroppings of truth in its movement toward validation. What for some appears as a geological formation of great strength and beauty appears to the contemporary gaze as an obstruction to its open movement and hermeneutic free play. Were we to join in the chorus of doubting Thomases we would have little time for a perspective which affirms the ability of human probing to make sense of our history and our world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 SPEP Program (Rochester
    SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY AND EXISTENTIAL PHILOSOPHY Executive Co-Directors Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Amy Allen, Dartmouth College Executive Committee Amy Allen, Dartmouth College Alia Al-Saji, McGill University Fred Evans, Duquesne University Brian Schroeder, Rochester Institute of Technology Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Shannon Mussett, Utah Valley University, Secretary-Treasurer Graduate Assistant Christopher C. Paone, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Advisory Book Selection Committee Shannon Winnubst, The Ohio State University, Chair Ann V. Murphy, Fordham University Brad Elliott Stone, Loyola Marymount University Adrian Johnston, University of New Mexico David Carr, Emory University Brent Adkins, Roanoke College Daniela Vallega-Neu, Univeristy of Oregon James D. Hatley, Salisbury University Advocacy Committee Robin James, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Chair Peter Gratton, Memorial University of Newfoundland Gail Weiss, George Washington University Committee on the Status of Women Laura Hengehold, Case Western Reserve University, Chair Shannon Sullivan, The Pennsylvania State University Elaine Miller, Miami University of Ohio Racial and Ethnic Diversity Committee Falguni Sheth, Hampshire College, Chair Hernando Estévez, John Jay College/CUNY Devonya Havis, Canisius College LGBTQ Advocacy Committee Robert Vallier, Institut d’Études Politiques, Chair William Wilkerson, University of Alabama Huntsville Mary Bloodsworth-Lugo, Washington State University Webmaster Christopher P. Long, The Pennsylvania State University Local Arrangements Contacts Brian Schroeder, local contact and organizer, [email protected] Scott Campbell, book exhibit coordinator, [email protected] Lindsey Johnson, student volunteer coordinator, [email protected] All SPEP sessions will be held at the Rochester Riverside Convention Center (RRCC) on 123 East Main St., Rochester, NY. The RRCC is adjacent to the host hotel, the Hyatt Regency Rochester, to which it is connected by an enclosed skyway.
    [Show full text]