DOCSLIB.ORG

VOLUME 6 Evaluation of Pilot Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VOLUME 6 Evaluation of Pilot Projects VOLUME 6 Evaluation of Pilot Projects The Study on Housing Reconstruction with Seismic-resistant Houses in the Republic of Peru TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND OF EVALUATION ................................................................................ 1-1 CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY OF EVALUATION OF THE PILOT PROJECT 1 ......................... 2-1 2.1. GENERAL............................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2. CONDUCT OF THE BUILDING SURVEY .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3. RESULTS OF COMPARISION OF THE PILOT PROJECT.............................................................................. 2-3 CHAPTER 3 INTERVIEW SURVEY ......................................................................................................3-1 3.1. OBJECTIVES......................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2. METHODOLOGY FOR THE EVALUATION ................................................................................................ 3-1 3.3. SURVEY RESULTS ................................................................................................................................3-4 3.3.1. Summary of the Survey Results................................................................................................. 3-4 3.3.2. Evaluation of Pilot Projects by Indicator ................................................................................... 3-6 APPENDIX APPENDIX 1. HOUSING RECONSTRUCTION PROGRESS BY DISTRICT (BONO6000 AND TECHO PROPIO) APPENDIX 2. HOUSING RECONSTRUCTION PROGRESS BY DISTRICT (BUILDING PERMITJ AND PROJECT BANK) APPENDIX 3. OTHER CONDITIONS (RATIO OF LANDS AND HOUSES REGISTRATED) APPENDIX 4. GENERAL CONDITION OF RECONSTRUCTION WITH CONFINED MANSONRY BY DISTRICT (POINTS OF CONSTRUCTION ACCURACY OR MISTAKES BY CONTRACTOR OR CONSTRUCTION ARTISAN) APPENDIX 5. GENERAL CONDITION OF RECONSTRUCTION WITH CONFINED MANSONRY BY DISTRICT (FLOOR PLAN) APPENDIX 6. GENERAL CONDITION OF RECONSTRUCTION WITH CONFINED MANSONRY BY DISTRICT (HAND MIXING OF CONCRETE) APPENDIX 7. GENERAL CONDITION OF RECONSTRUCTION WITH CONFINED MANSONRY BY DISTRICT (OTHER ASPECT) APPENDIX 8. CRITICAL POINTS OF CONFINED MANSONRY HOUSE BY DISTRICT APPENDIX 9 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PARTICIPANTS APPENDIX 10 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NON PARTICIPANTS APPENDIX 11 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR MUNICIPALITY OFFICER APPENDIX 12 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ALBAÑILES’ APPENDIX 13 TABLES AND FIGURES OF QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PARTICIPANTS APPENDIX 14 TABLES AND FIGURES OF QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NON PARTICIPANTS APPENDIX 15 TABLES AND FIGURES OF QUESTIONNAIRE FOR MUNICIPALITY OFFICERS APPENDIX 16 TABLE OF QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ALBAÑILES i Volume 6 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Actual Schedule of Building Survey for 33 District Municipalities in November 2008........... 2-3 Table 2.2 Comparison Results of Building Survey for 33 District Municipalities ................................... 2-7 Table 3.1 Total Surveyed Population by District ...................................................................................... 3-2 Table 3.2 Schedule of Pilot Projects Implementation by District and by Municipality............................ 3-2 Table 3.3 No. of Surveyed Population by Type of Project Participation .................................................. 3-3 Table 3.4 Result of Question P9 ............................................................................................................... 3-7 Table 3.5 Result of Question P12 ............................................................................................................. 3-8 Table 3.6 Result of Question P14 ............................................................................................................. 3-8 Table 3.7 Result of Question P15 ............................................................................................................. 3-8 Table 3.8 Result of Question P19 ............................................................................................................. 3-9 Table 3.9 Result of Question P18 ............................................................................................................. 3-9 Table 3.10 Result of Question P25 ............................................................................................................. 3-9 Table 3.11 Result of Question P27 ........................................................................................................... 3-10 Table 3.12 Result of Question P31 ........................................................................................................... 3-10 Table 3.13 Result of Question NP8 .......................................................................................................... 3-11 Table 3.14 Result of Question NP9 .......................................................................................................... 3-11 Table 3.15 Result of Question NP16 ........................................................................................................ 3-11 Table 3.16 Result of Question NP15 ........................................................................................................ 3-12 Table 3.17 Result of Question NP24 ........................................................................................................ 3-12 Table 3.18 Result of Question P35 ........................................................................................................... 3-14 Table 3.19 Result of Question P22 ........................................................................................................... 3-14 Table 3.20 Result of Question P23 ........................................................................................................... 3-15 Table 3.21 Result of Question P16 ........................................................................................................... 3-15 Table 3.22 Result of Question P25 ........................................................................................................... 3-16 Table 3.23 Result of Question P34 ........................................................................................................... 3-16 Table 3.24 Result of Question NP19 ........................................................................................................ 3-17 Table 3.25 Result of Question NP20 ........................................................................................................ 3-17 Table 3.26 Result of Question NP13 ........................................................................................................ 3-18 Table 3.27 Result of Question NP22 ........................................................................................................ 3-18 Table 3.28 Result of Question NP28 ........................................................................................................ 3-18 ii The Study on Housing Reconstruction with Seismic-resistant Houses in the Republic of Peru CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND OF EVALUATION In response to the reconstruction needs of victims of the earthquake of August 2007, JICA Study Team has implemented three Pilot Projects between the months of August and November, 2008. These projects were designed to investigate components of best practices and modus operandi that make the strongest impact for the future full-scale assistance project to facilitate the reconstruction of housing of the earthquake victims whose houses were lost in the earthquake. In order to determine these components and make a recommendation for the full-scale assistance project to be implemented by the Government of Peru, project evaluation was conducted after completing the Pilot Projects 2.1 and 2.2 and Pilot Project 3 in November 2008. Owing to the nature of the three different Pilot Projects, quantitative and qualitative analysis were applied to the projects. Pilot Project 1 was focused on capacity building of the Municipality officers who are responsible for construction. Therefore, evaluation results were analyzed and measured through quantitative aspects, such as increase in the number of permanent houses which have been reconstructed (including under construction) by BONO 6000 and the number of permanent houses with approval of building permit which have been inspected upon construction, etc. For Pilot Projects 2.1, 2.2 and 3, the focus was on awareness raising and capacity building of the earthquake affected population. The evaluation survey was done to the pilot project participated population and non-participated population to assess the impact of the project. Also, the conditions in districts where projects were not implemented were appraised as a “control” for the survey. The results of the evaluation were analyzed by qualitative aspects, such as “Did the pilot projects contribute to the dissemination of knowledge of safer housing construction?” and “Did the Pilot Projects contribute to dissemination of government programs supporting housing reconstruction?” Also interviews surveys with albañiles were done to grasp the reconstruction situation through the eyes of the actors of the construction sector. Limitation of this Evaluation This evaluation was conducted just one week after the project completion. It takes sometime for the project impact to have influence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Study on Housing Reconstruction with Seismic-Resistant Houses in the Republic of Peru
    No. Ministry of Housing, Construction and Sanitation (MVCS) Republic of Peru The Study on Housing Reconstruction with Seismic-resistant Houses in the Republic of Peru Final Report Main May 2009 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. GED JR 09-047 Ministry of Housing, Construction and Sanitation (MVCS) Republic of Peru The Study on Housing Reconstruction with Seismic-resistant Houses in the Republic of Peru Final Report Main May 2009 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. The exchange rate applied in the Study is: JPY 1.00 = S/0.0318 US＄1.00 = S/3.0334 (December, 2008) PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Peru, the Government of Japan decided to conduct the Study on Housing Reconstruction with Seismic-resistant Houses for the purpose of assisting in the reconstruction of houses destroyed by the earthquake that occurred on August 15th, 2007 in Peru. The Government of Japan entrusted to the study to Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team headed by Mr. Ichiro Kobayashi of Oriental Consultants Co., LTD. between March, 2008 and March, 2009. The team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Peru and conducted field surveys at the study area. Upon returning to Japan, the team conducted further studies and prepared this final report. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of this project and to the enhancement of friendly relationship between our two countries. Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Peru for their close cooperation extended to the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Peru – Earthquake
    U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU FOR DEMOCRACY, CONFLICT, AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE (DCHA) OFFICE OF U.S. FOREIGN DISASTER ASSISTANCE (OFDA) Peru – Earthquake Fact Sheet #4, Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 September 5, 2007 Note: The last fact sheet was dated August 27, 2007. KEY DEVELOPMENTS • On August 29, U.S. Ambassador P. Michael McKinley and a team of representatives from the U.S. Embassy in Lima, USAID/Peru, and USAID/OFDA traveled to Pisco Province to earthquake-affected areas. The U.S. Government (USG) team found that camp management and the provision of shelter remain the main challenges to the ongoing humanitarian response. • On August 28, the U.N. announced a flash appeal for nearly $37 million to assist more than 200,000 people over the next six months. Immediate needs in the appeal include shelter, medical care, food assistance, emergency relief supplies, tools for debris removal, and water, sanitation, and hygiene. NUMBERS AT A GLANCE* SOURCE Total Affected Population 519 killed, 1,366 injured INDECI1, August 30, 2007 Houses Destroyed 60,519 houses INDECI, August 30, 2007 Houses Damaged 14,553 houses INDECI, August 30, 2007 *Based on current estimates. Assessments to determine precise damage and affected population figures are ongoing. FY 2007 HUMANITARIAN FUNDING PROVIDED TO DATE USAID/OFDA Assistance to Peru.........................................................................................................................$2,014,220 Total USAID Humanitarian Assistance to Peru ..................................................................................................$2,014,220
    [Show full text]
  • Peru: Earthquake GLIDE N° EQ-2007-000133-PER Operations Update N° 9 12 August 2009
    Emergency appeal n° MDRPE003 Peru: Earthquake GLIDE n° EQ-2007-000133-PER Operations update n° 9 12 August 2009 Period covered by this Ops Update: 1 April to 30 June 2009 Appeal target (current): CHF 11,017,248.00 (USD 9,790,411 or EUR 7,201,756); Appeal coverage (30 June 2009): 99%; <Click here to go directly to the interim financial report or here to link to contact details > Appeal history: · This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on 17 August 2007 (for CHF 1,626,000 (USD 1,341,869 or EUR 979,150) for 5 months to assist 4,000 families (20,000 people). · Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF): CHF 250,000 (USD 207,641 or EUR 151,515) was initially allocated from the Federation’s DREF to support the National Society to respond. · The Revised Appeal launched on 20 August 2007 featured a Revised Appeal Budget for CHF 5,605,000 (USD 4,655,315 or EUR 3,396,970) for 9 months to assist 7,500 families (37,500 people). · A second revision of the Appeal Budget was made on 3 December 2007 for CHF 10,895,000 (USD 9,917,000 or EUR 6,785,000) for 18 months (February 2009) to assist 7,500 families (37,500 people). In San Clemente (Pisco), members of the · The Operations Update n° 7 featured an extension of the community make compressed earth and cement timeframe for 10 months until 31 December 2009. bricks for the construction of their own houses. International Federation / J.Ormeño · In order to better reflect the situation, the Operations Update n° 8 was issued with a third revision of the Appeal Budget for CHF 11,017,248 (USD 9,790,411 or EUR 7,201,756).
    [Show full text]
  • Peru – Earthquake
    U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU FOR DEMOCRACY, CONFLICT, AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE (DCHA) OFFICE OF U.S. FOREIGN DISASTER ASSISTANCE (OFDA) Peru – Earthquake Fact Sheet #5, Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 September 14, 2007 Note: The last fact sheet was dated September 5, 2007. KEY DEVELOPMENTS • Between September 11 and 13, USAID/OFDA airlifted an additional 800 rolls of plastic sheeting from the USAID/OFDA warehouse in Miami to help meet continuing shelter needs. The total value of the plastic sheeting, including transport, is $337,690. • With funding from USAID/OFDA, CARE, Caritas, and World Vision will provide temporary shelter solutions to a combined total of 3,000 to 4,500 families in Cañete, Chincha, Ica, and Yauyos provinces. The plastic sheeting airlifted by USAID/OFDA will be used as part of this shelter program. The Peruvian Corps of Voluntary Firefighters, with which USAID/OFDA has had a long-term technical assistance and training relationship, will provide support to the non-government organizations for program implementation. NUMBERS AT A GLANCE* SOURCE Total Affected Population 519 killed, 1,844 injured INDECI1, September 11, 2007 Houses Destroyed 52,891 houses INDECI, September 11, 2007 Houses Damaged 22,939 houses INDECI, September 11, 2007 *Based on current estimates. Assessments to determine precise damage and affected population figures are ongoing. FY 2007 HUMANITARIAN FUNDING PROVIDED TO DATE USAID/OFDA Assistance to Peru.........................................................................................................................$2,551,910
    [Show full text]
  • AIR South America Earthquake Model Webinar
    Preview of the New AIR South America Earthquake Models CONFIDENTIAL ©2015 AIR WORLDWIDE 1 CONFIDENTIAL ©2015 AIR WORLDWIDE 2 Agenda • New Hazard Modeling: Data & Methods • New Vulnerability Modeling: Data & Methods • Model Validation: Component-Level & Loss Estimation • Software: New Features for South America CONFIDENTIAL ©2015 AIR WORLDWIDE 3 New Hazard Modeling Mesut Turel CONFIDENTIAL ©2015 AIR WORLDWIDE 4 South America Is One of the Most Seismically Active Regions of the World Nazca Plate South America Plate http://sicarius.wr.usgs.gov/IDB/ 2007 Pisco 2014 Iquique 2010 Maule Earthquake 2010 Maule 1960 M9.6 Earthquake Length: 1000 km 1960 M9.6* Width: 100 – 150 km Maximum Uplift: ~ 5.7 m Maximum Subsidence: ~ 2.3 m * Largest recorded earthquake worldwide CONFIDENTIAL ©2015 AIR WORLDWIDE 5 The AIR Earthquake Models for South America Is Receiving a Comprehensive Update Industry Exposure Database New Shake Catalog Damage Seismicity Time-Dependent Function Model Methodology AIR Intensity New Risk Earthquake Types Modeling Models for GMPEs Industry Facilities, Soil Maps Infrastructure, Builder’s Risk South America Liquefaction New Seismic Risk Design Codes Tsunami Risk on the Pacific Coast CONFIDENTIAL ©2015 AIR WORLDWIDE 6 Stochastic Event Generation Requires Latest Data Sources and Knowledge - Historical earthquakes, fault • Historical earthquake parameters, and GPS data constrain catalog data the magnitude-rate in a seismic • Fault slip rates source zone • GPS strain rates Seismic moment rate Driven by Driven by: • Historical earthquake
    [Show full text]
  • Inaugural (Subject to Confirmed Attendance by 18Th July
    Inaugural (subject to confirmed attendance by 18th July) Environmental Health Peru Study Tour 13th November to the 23rd November 2015 (see end of itinerary for details and costs) (www.greece-map.net) Peru is a country in South America that's home to a section of Amazon rainforest and Machu Picchu, an ancient Incan city set high in the Andes mountains. The area surrounding Machu Picchu, including the Sacred Valley, the Inca Trail and the lively city of Cusco, is also rich in Incan sites as well as hiking, rafting and mountain-biking opportunities. Peru is an extremely biodiverse country with habitats ranging from the arid plains of the Pacific coastal region in the west to the peaks of the Andes mountains vertically extending from the north to the southeast of the country to the tropical Amazon Basin rainforest in the east with the Amazon river. Peruvian territory was home to ancient cultures spanning from the Norte Chico civilization in Caral, one of the oldest in the world, to the Inca Empire, the largest state in Pre-Columbian America. The Spanish Empire conquered the region in the 16th century and established a Viceroyalty with its capital in Lima, which included most of its South American colonies. Ideas of political autonomy later spread throughout Spanish America and Peru gained its independence, which was formally proclaimed in 1821. After the battle of Ayacucho, three years after proclamation, Peru ensured its independence. After achieving independence, the country remained in recession and kept a low military profile until an economic rise based on the extraction of raw and maritime materials struck the country, which ended shortly before the war of the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Events Supposedly Attributable to Vaccination Or Immunization Associated with Receipt of Yellow Fever Vaccine During a Mass Immunization Campaign Peru, 2007
    Serious Events Supposedly Attributable to Vaccination or Immunization Associated with Receipt of Yellow Fever Vaccine During a Mass Immunization Campaign Peru, 2007 Findings and Recommendations of an Expert Panel Washington, D.C., March 2008 2 Table of Contents Expert Panel Members . 5 Acronyms . 7 Introduction . 9 Clinical and Pathological Features of the Cases . 10 Epidemiological Investigations and Search for Additional Cases . 11 Incidence of YEL-AVD in Ica Department . 11 Virological Analyses and Potential Causal Relationship Between ESAVIs and the 121Z Lot . 12 Inspection of Bio-Manguinhos Manufacturing Facility . 13 Major Conclusions of the Expert Panel . 13 Recommendations . 14 a) Communicating the Information . 14 b) Further Investigation of Cases . 14 c) Improved Information on ESAVI Incidence and Risk Factors . 15 d) Other . 16 Annexes: 1. Case Summary (Cases 1-4) . 19 2. Case Report of Possible Non-fatal Yellow Fever Vaccine-associated Viscerotropic Disease . 27 3. Protocol for Yellow Fever ESAVI Investigation Ica, Peru, 2007 . 31 4. Report of the Virology Subcommittee Investigating ESAVIs in Ica Department, Peru, September-October 2007 . 41 3 4 Expert Panel Members Thomas P. Monath, MD (Chairman) Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers Pandemic & Biodefense Fund, USA Edward B. Hayes, MD Surveillance and Epidemiology Activity of Arboviral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA Martin Cetron, MD Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA Alan D. T. Barrett, MD Center for Biodefense
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal E-Mail: [email protected]
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 Appeal E-mail: [email protected] Coordinating Office Peru Assistance to earthquake victims – LAPE71 Appeal Target: US$ 852,352 Total requested: US$ 758,357 Geneva, 13 November 2007 Dear Colleagues, On August 15, 2007, an earthquake of a magnitude of 7.0 on the Richter scale occurred 62 kilometers from the city of Pisco, and 262 kilometers to the south of Lima, Peru. The earthquake affected the southwestern part of Lima, on the west coast, along a stretch 186 kilometers long and 70 kilometers wide, covering an area of approximately 13,000 square kilometers. The regions hardest hit were Ica (provinces of Pisco, Ica, and Chincha), Lima (provinces of Cañete and Yauyos) and Huancavelica (provinces of Huaytará and Castrovirreyna). The earthquake resulted in 540 deaths, some 4,200 injuries, 52,000 victims and close to 200,000 persons affected. Approximately 53,000 homes were destroyed and around 22,000 homes were affected, as well as schools, hospitals and health centers. Likewise, 20 kilometers of irrigation canals were destroyed (11 kilometers in Castrovirreyna and 9 in Huaytará), and approximately 44 kilometers of canals were affected. In the days after the disaster, ACT Forum members PREDES, DIACONIA and LWR assessed the damage in areas they are operating in. A RRF was issued to support the population in the provinces of Chincha, Huaytará and Castrovirreyna. PREDES and DIACONIA provided emergency shelters, water deposits and sanitation. They distributed training materials related to hygiene, construction of earthquake resistant housing and assistance to children to cope with disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 8 Extension of the Pilot Project 1
    Volume 8 Extension of the Pilot Project 1 The Study on Housing Reconstruction with Seismic-resistant Houses in the Republic of Peru TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND OF EXTENDING THE PILOT PROJECT 1...................................... 1-1 CHAPTER 2 OJT AND WORKSHOP CARRIED OUT BY LOCAL ENGINEERS UNDER SUPERVISION OF JICA STUDY TEAM ........................................................................ 2-1 2.1. OBJECTIVE OF OJT AND WORKSHOP ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2. IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1. Selection Process of Pilot Project Areas .................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2. Implementation Procedure of OJT and Workshop including Preparation of Materials and Supervision of Local Engineers’ Works..................................................................................... 2-3 2.3. SCHEDULE........................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.4. IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.4.1. Outputs....................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.4.2. OJT ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peru: Earthquake GLIDE N° EQ-2007-000133-PER Operations Update N° 8 25 March 2009
    Emergency appeal n° MDRPE003 Peru: Earthquake GLIDE n° EQ-2007-000133-PER Operations update n° 8 25 March 2009 Period covered by this Ops Update: 26 October 2008 to 31 December 2008. Appeal target (current): CHF 11,017,247 (USD 9,790,411 or EUR 7,201,756). Appeal coverage (current): 100%; Click here to go to the updated donor response report at http://www.ifrc.org/docs/appeals/Active /MDRPE003.pdf), <Click here to go to the attached Revised Budget, here for the Interim Financial Report or here to link to contact details > Appeal history: · On 17 August 2007 an Emergency Appeal was launched for CHF Inauguration of seismic resistant adobe house built by the International 1,626,000 (USD 1,341,869 or EUR Federation in cooperation with PUCP in the Cabeza de Toro community. 979,150) for 5 months to assist 30 community members are now able to build and expand their houses 4,000 families (20,000 people). according to their needs thanks to International Federation training. · Disaster Relief Emergency Funds Source: International Federation. (DREF) allocated: CHF 250,000 (USD 207,641 or EUR 151,515). · A Revised Appeal on 20 August 2007 featured a Revised Appeal Budget of CHF 5,605,000 (USD 4,655,315 or EUR 3,396,970) for 9 months to assist 7,500 families (37,500 people). · A Second revision of the Appeal Budget was made on 3 December 2007 for CHF 10,895,000 (USD 9,917,000 or EUR 6,785,000) for 18 months (February 2009) to assist 7,500 families (37,500 people).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Pre-Feasibility Study Report Ii-1 Program Report
    AND VULNERABLE RURAL POPULATION AGAINST FLOOD IN THE REPUBLIC OF PERU THE REPUBLIC OF FLOOD IN AGAINST POPULATION VULNERABLE RURAL AND FLOOD PLAIN THE PROTECTION OF OF ON PROJECT STUDY THE PREPARATORY Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Peru THE PREPARATORY STUDY ON PROJECT OF THE PROTECTION OF FLOOD PLAIN AND VULNERABLE RURAL POPULATION AGAINST FLOOD IN THE REPUBLIC OF PERU FINAL REPORT PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT FINAL REPORT II-1 REPORT FINAL II-1 PROGRAM REPORT March 2013 March March 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI LATIN AMERICA – CARIBBEAN Co., LTD. 八千代_516342-09_h_JICAペルー国～英文 I-7 1 1 2013/03/28 11:53:23 Composition of Final Report I. Feasibility Study Report I-1 Program Report I-2 Project Report (Cañete River) I-3 Project Report (Chincha River) I-4 Project Report (Pisco River) I-5 Project Report (Majes-Camana River ) I-6 Supporting Report Annex – 1 Metrology /Hydrology /Run-off Analysis Annex – 2 Inundation Analysis Annex – 3 River Bed Fluctuation Analysis Annex－4 Flood Control Plan Annex – 5 Forecasting and Warning System in Chira River Annex – 6 Sediment Control Annex – 7 Afforestation and Vegetation Recovery Plan Annex – 8 Plan and Design of Facilities Annex – 9 Construction Planning and Cost Estimate Annex – 10 Socio-economy and Economic Evaluation Annex – 11 Environmental and Social Considerations/ Gender Annex – 12 Technical Assistance Annex – 13 Stakeholders Meetings Annex – 14 Implementation Program of Japanese Yen Loan Project Annex－15 Drawings
    [Show full text]
  • Minsur Sustinability Report 2019
    MINSUR SUSTINABILITY REPORT 2019 1 Minsur Sustinability Report 2019 2 3 Minsur Sustinability Report 2019 Minsur S. A. Calle Bernini 149, San Borja, Lima, Perú Phone: (511) 215-8330 Web sites: www.minsur.com www.marcobre.com www.mtaboca.com.br For further information on our organization and sustainability management, you may contact us at [email protected] (GRI 102-1) (GRI 102-5) (GRI 102-53) (GRI 102-3) Prepared by: Avanza Sostenible www.avanzasostenible.com 4 5 Minsur Sustinability Report 2019 MINING WITH A SUSTAINABLE APPROACH In terms of occupational health, the new coronavirus made (GRI 102-14) us quickly transform all our standards, implementing the necessary protocols to ensure the highest level of health “Our vision is setting a benchmark in sustainability for the mining industry” for our staff and to mitigate transmission risks the best In this interview Juan Luis Kruger, Minsur’s CEO, shares some of the most outstanding achievements in sustainability way possible. This challenges us to be better, and reach management in 2019. the levels of occupational safety we are already used to. If you had to define 2019 for Minsur in one word, Looking forward, what is Minsur expecting for the Before the virus arrived, occupational health issues what would it be and why? beginning of the new decade? were also being managed more efficiently? Transformation. We finished building our B2 project, Our vision in Minsur is to continue our consolidation as In 2019 we launched our occupational health management and we are recycling material that had been already a global leader within the tin industry and, specially, as system, very similar to our safety management system, processed in the past and was stored in a tailings dam.
    [Show full text]