Great Falls Hydroelectric Project (P- 2814) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) AIRS & Deficiencies Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Falls Hydroelectric Project (P- 2814) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project (P- 2814) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) AIRS & Deficiencies Response Prepared By: Prepared For: Young Energy Services AUGUST 2019 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 DEFICIENCIES Exhibit B 1. Section 4.51 (c) of the Commission’s regulations requires a tailwater rating and a curve showing power plant capability versus head and specifying maximum, normal, and minimum heads. Please provide these curves for the project. Response: The available curves are provided below. Minimum head, corresponding to the crest elevation of the S.U.M. dam is 114.60 feet mean sea level (msl) or 71.37 feet of head. Normal operating head, corresponding to the top of flashboards installed on the S.U.M. dam is 116.85 feet msl or 73.62 feet of head. Maximum head, corresponding to flashboard height at failure (i.e., two feet of overtopping) is 118.85 feet msl or 75.62 feet of head. Additionally, maximum head, corresponding to the plant intake and retaining walls is 124.0 feet msl (80.77 feet of head). As noted on the Spillway Discharge Curve (without flashboards) figure, a critical elevation of 122.0 feet msl (78.77 feet of head) has been identified based on flooding of upstream infrastructure. FIGURE 1: Tailwater Rating Curve 1 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 FIGURE 2: Spillway Discharge Curve (without Flashboards) FIGURE 3: Spillway Discharge Curve (with Flashboards) 2 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 FIGURE 3: Spillway Discharge Curve (with Flashboards) 3 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 FIGURE 4: Plant Discharge Curve 4 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 EXHIBIT F 2. The Exhibit F drawings provided for the Great Falls Hydroelectric Project (Great Falls Project or project.) do not meet the requirements of section 4.51(g) (which refers to section 4.41(g)) of the Commission’s regulations. The drawings must show all major project structures in sufficient detail to provide a full understanding of the project. Thus, please provide a new plan view drawing of the existing powerhouse that shows the three penstocks, turbines/generators, and draft tubes; and the fish passage facility. Response: Figures 5 and 6 present revised drawings prepared for FERC. FIGURES 5 AND 6 ARE BEING FILED SEPARATELY CUI//CEII 5 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 3. Section 4.51(g) (which refers to section 4.41(g)) of the Commission’s regulations requires that an applicant provide a supporting design report (SDR). Therefore, you must provide the following information (filed as Critical Energy Infrastructure Information or CEII) for the Great Falls Project: (1) a stability analysis of the project’s dam structures under all loading conditions, in accordance with the Commission’s Engineering Guidelines, which must include copies of any existing boring logs, geology reports, laboratory test reports, and other references used to justify the foundation shear strength parameters used in the stability analysis; and (2) a justification for the 100-year flood discharge and water surface elevation at the Great Falls Project, since the project must be able to safely pass at least the 100-year flood. Response: A time extension has been requested in order to complete this item. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTS Exhibit A 4. Please provide a narrative description of the existing project boundary, including how the boundary is determined (i.e., high water mark, boundary lines, metes and bounds, etc.). In addition, on page A-7 of the final license application (FLA), you propose to remove the Great Falls from the project boundary. So that staff can properly analyze this proposal, please clarify how much acreage you propose to remove from the project boundary and an explanation as to why the land proposed for removal is not needed for the operation and maintenance of the project or for other project purposes, such as recreation, shoreline control, or protection of environmental resources. Response: The existing boundary is a combination of an elevation-based reservoir and a metes and bounds description around the Great Falls area. It is proposed that 7.08 acres be removed from the project. The area to be removed is shaded in Figure 7 and detailed in Figure 8. The land removed from the boundary is to be maintained by the City and the National Park Service (NPS) as protected lands for recreation and other purposes. The land downstream of the S.U.M. Dam is not needed for energy production or maintenance of the project. It is appropriate that through the new license, FERC stipulate the minimum flow over the Dam, as is presently done through License Article 27. Minimum flow(s), and ambient flow above the hydraulic capacity of the powerhouse, pass over the S.U.M. dam and then automatically discharge over the Great Falls. 8 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 Other project purposes, such as recreation and shoreline protection within the reservoir area, will be controlled by FERC and maintained by the Licensee under the new license. The Great Falls will be maintained by the City of Paterson or the NPS. 9 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 FIGURE 7: Proposed Project Boundary Proposed 7.08 Acres to be ± Removed from Project Boundary 114.69Total Area of 1985 Previous Project Boundary in Acres 107.60Total Area of 2019 Current Project Boundary in Acres 7.08Total Area of Great Falls Removed from 1985 Project Boundary Legend Extent Orginal of 1985 Project Boundary Great Falls Area Being Removed From Orginal Project Boundary Extent of 2019 Project Boundary 0 0.5 1 Miles Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 10 FERC AIRS & Deficiencies Response Great Falls Hydroelectric Project: P-2814 FIGURE 8: Detail of Area to Be Removed from Project Boundary THIS PLAN IS HEREBY APPROVED BY THE PASSAIC COUNTY PLANNING BOARD SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS, AGREEMENTS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH BY THE DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY BLOCK 4601, LOT 1 PASSAIC COUNTY PLANNING BOARD. ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED AND LYING IN THE CITY OF PATERSON, COUNTY OF PASSAIC, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT EVIDENCED BY A REBAR WITH CAP LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY END OF THE CURVE CONNECTING THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF WAYNE AVENUE (50' WIDE R.O.W.) LEADING TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE MCBRIDE AVENUE EXTENSION (60' WIDE R.O.W.); THENCE, FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT THE FOLLOWING: 1. ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF MCBRIDE AVENUE EXTENSION ON A CURVE TO SITE THE RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 72.23', A RADIUS OF 170.16', A CHORD WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LANDS LENGTH OF 71.69', AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 73° 56' 54" WEST TO A SHOWN HEREON, SHOWN AND DESIGNATED AS BLOCK 4601 POINT OF NON-TANGENCY LOTS 1 AND 2, AND APPROVE THE PLOTTING OF SAME FOR COINCIDENT WITH BLOCK 4601, LOT 1.01 THE FOLLOWING 6 COURSES, FILING WITH CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC. 2. ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 38.78', A RADIUS OF 61.00', A CHORD LENGTH OF 38.13', AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 06° 09' OWNER & APPLICANT : CITY OF PATERSON 25" WEST TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY BLOCK 4601, LOT 2 3. ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 7.23', A RADIUS OF 27.00', A CHORD LENGTH OF 7.21', AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 32° 02' 40" ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED AND LYING IN THE WEST TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE CITY OF PATERSON, COUNTY OF PASSAIC, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BEING MORE 4. ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 5.69', A RADIUS OF PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 16.00', A CHORD LENGTH OF 5.66', AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 29° 32' 10" WEST TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE BEGINNING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO BLOCK 4601, LOTS 2 AND 3 LOCATED ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF MCBRIDE AVENUE (60' WIDE); THENCE, 5. ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 50.68', A RADIUS OF FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT THE FOLLOWING: 80.00', A CHORD LENGTH OF 49.83', AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 01° 12' 17" WEST TO A POINT OF TANGENCY 1. SOUTH 40° 40' 12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.83' ON A LINE COINCIDENT WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF MCBRIDE AVENUE TO A POINT EVIDENCED BY A 6. NORTH 16° 56' 32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 14.96' TO A POINT LOCATED AT THE DRILL HOLE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE EXISTING FOOTBRIDGE WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LANDS 2. CONTINUING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF MCBRIDE AVENUE ON A CURVE LOCATION MAP SHOWN HEREON , SHOWN AND DESIGNATED AS _______________, 7. NORTH 63° 32' 05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 11.51' ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY TO THE RIGHT, HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 230.36', A RADIUS OF 248.00', A ENTRANCE TO THE EXISTING FOOTBRIDGE AND APPROVE THE PLOTTING OF SAME FOR FILING WITH CLERK CHORD LENGTH OF 222.17', AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 67° 16' 50" AS TAKEN FROM THE USGS QUADRANGLE OF THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC.
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Plan Narrative Responses
    City of Paterson City of Paterson 2015-2019 5 Year Strategic Plan This document includes Narrative Responses to specific questions that grantees of the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS and Emergency Shelter Grants Programs must respond to in order to be compliant with the Consolidated Planning Regulations. GENERAL Executive Summary The Executive Summary is required. Include the objectives and outcomes identified in the plan and an evaluation of past performance. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Executive Summary: The City of Paterson’s 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan is a five-year plan mandated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and predicated upon its receipt of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funds. This plan identifies the specific needs concerning affordable housing, homeownership, housing rehabilitation, and community development needs, such as: infrastructure, economic development and public service needs. The Strategic Plan element of this plan specifies the goals identified in the preparation of this plan and includes goals that the Consolidated Plan revolves around. The plan’s development includes a profile of the community and its economy, an assessment of housing and community development needs, and the development of long-range strategies to meet those needs. This five year plan which covers the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019, serves the following functions: • A planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders; • A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for jurisdictions; • A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and • A management tool for assessing performance and tracking results.
    [Show full text]
  • Salvage Archaeology in Paterson, NJ, 1973-75 Edward S
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 4 1974 Symposium on Industrial Archaeology, Article 2 Paterson, N.J. 1975 Salvage Archaeology in Paterson, NJ, 1973-75 Edward S. Rutsch Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Rutsch, Edward S. (1975) "Salvage Archaeology in Paterson, NJ, 1973-75," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 4 4, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol4/iss1/2 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Salvage lrcbeologr in Paterson, I.J., 1873-75 Edward S. Butsch INTRODUCTION: DOUBLE PIONEERS at the l owest social level, and then also being given a job as a camel driver. In the early 1970's, I telephoned anthro­ Whether they were farmers or craftsmen pologist Dr. Gene Weltfish to discuss the in their homelands, the immigrants' new uniqueness of the ethnic makeup of Pater­ life in industrial Paterson was tot ally son. We speculated on the smaller percen­ different in these two ways-- hence, they tage of oldtimer s in Paterson in compari­ were double pioneers. son with other i ndustrial urban centers Dr. Weltfish furthermore pointed out in the Northeast. We discussed the pat­ that a substantial part of Paterson' s mo­ tern of Paterson residents moving to the dern population consists in t wo new groups nearby suburban areas of Wayne and Ridge­ of immigrants, both mostly rural peasants: wood, and how, if we were to appeal to the Caribbean people, largely from Puerto people with a Paterson heritage to pre­ Rico; and the southern American Negro .
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 12/30/2019 PASSAIC County
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 12 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 12/30/2019 PASSAIC County Dundee Textile Complex (ID#2329) PASSAIC County 2 Ackerman Avenue SHPO Opinion: 10/18/1988 Bloomingdale Borough Erie Railroad Main Line Historic District (ID#218) Standard Oil Company Pipeline (ID#2326) Erie Railroad Right-of-Way westward from Hudson, Jersey City at Coles DOE: 8/20/1981 Street to undetermined extent SHPO Opinion: 9/21/1978 SHPO Opinion: 2/20/2003 (Previous Opinion: 3/10/1999; Opinion of 3/7/2006 (C2006-38- PROD) expands boundaries to include NJT Bergen County Wanaque Reservoir Historic District (ID#4844) Line.) SHPO Opinion: 3/2/2006 See Main Entry / Filed Location: See Main Entry / Filed Location: HUDSON County, Jersey City PASSAIC County, Wanaque Borough Garden State Parkway Historic District (ID#3874) White's Paper Mill Historic District (ID#4890) Entire Garden State Parkway right-of-way Macopin Road SHPO Opinion: 10/12/2001 SHPO Opinion: 10/10/2003 See Main Entry / Filed Location: See Main Entry / Filed Location: CAPE_MAY County, Lower Township MORRIS County, Butler Borough Garret Mountain Park (ID#2380) Clifton City Garret Mountain Reservation, northern most tip of the first Watchung Mountain ridge, south of Paterson 17th/18th Century Historic Farmstead Archaeological Site (ID#3663) DOE: 1/30/1980 SHPO Opinion: 7/19/1989 SHPO Opinion: 10/26/1979 See Main Entry / Filed Location: Archaeological Site (28-Pa-39) (ID#3666) PASSAIC County, Paterson City SHPO Opinion: 7/19/1989 Delaware,
    [Show full text]
  • PASSAIC County
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 12 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 9/28/2021 PASSAIC County Dundee Textile Complex (ID#2329) PASSAIC County 2 Ackerman Avenue SHPO Opinion: 10/18/1988 Bloomingdale Borough Erie Railroad Main Line Historic District (ID#218) Standard Oil Company Pipeline (ID#2326) Erie Railroad Right-of-Way westward from Hudson, Jersey City at Coles DOE: 8/20/1981 Street to undetermined extent SHPO Opinion: 9/21/1978 SHPO Opinion: 2/20/2003 (Previous Opinion: 3/10/1999; Opinion of 3/7/2006 (C2006-38- PROD) expands boundaries to include NJT Bergen County Wanaque Reservoir Historic District (ID#4844) Line.) SHPO Opinion: 3/2/2006 See Main Entry / Filed Location: See Main Entry / Filed Location: HUDSON County, Jersey City PASSAIC County, Wanaque Borough Garden State Parkway Historic District (ID#3874) White's Paper Mill Historic District (ID#4890) Entire Garden State Parkway right-of-way Macopin Road SHPO Opinion: 10/12/2001 SHPO Opinion: 10/10/2003 See Main Entry / Filed Location: See Main Entry / Filed Location: CAPE_MAY County, Lower Township MORRIS County, Butler Borough Garret Mountain Park (ID#2380) Clifton City Garret Mountain Reservation, northern most tip of the first Watchung Mountain ridge, south of Paterson 17th/18th Century Historic Farmstead Archaeological Site (ID#3663) DOE: 1/30/1980 SHPO Opinion: 7/19/1989 SHPO Opinion: 10/26/1979 See Main Entry / Filed Location: Archaeological Site (28-Pa-39) (ID#3666) PASSAIC County, Paterson City SHPO Opinion: 7/19/1989 Delaware,
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan Narrative Responses
    City of Paterson City of Paterson 2010-2014 5 Year Strategic Plan This document includes Narrative Responses to specific questions that grantees of the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS and Emergency Shelter Grants Programs must respond to in order to be compliant with the Consolidated Planning Regulations. GENERAL Executive Summary The Executive Summary is required. Include the objectives and outcomes identified in the plan and an evaluation of past performance. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Executive Summary: The City of Paterson’s 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan is a five-year plan mandated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and predicated upon its receipt of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funds. This plan identifies the specific needs concerning affordable housing, homeownership, housing rehabilitation, and community development needs, such as: infrastructure, economic development and public service needs. The Strategic Plan element of this plan specifies the goals identified in the preparation of this plan and includes goals that the Consolidated Plan revolves around. The plan’s development includes a profile of the community and its economy, an assessment of housing and community development needs, and the development of long-range strategies to meet those needs. This five year plan which covers the period from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2014, serves the following functions: • A planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders; • A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for jurisdictions; • A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and • A management tool for assessing performance and tracking results.
    [Show full text]
  • RECORDS by CO/MUNIC
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 8 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 2/25/2004 Garret Mountain Park (ID#2380) P as s aic County Garret Mountain Reservation, northern most tip of the first Watchung Mountain ridge, south of Paterson DOE: 1/30/1980 Bloomingdale Borough SHPO Opinion: 10/26/1979 Standard Oil Company Pipeline (ID#2326) See Main Entry / Filed Location: Federal Hill Passaic County, Paterson City DOE: 8/20/1981 SHPO Opinion: 9/21/1978 Kingsland Avenue Bridge (ID#251) Kingsland Avenue over NJ Transit Main Line, Milepost 8.69 Clifton City SHPO Opinion: 2/3/1999 17th/18th Century Historic Farmstead Archaeological Site (ID#3663) Lyndhurst Draw (ID#2950) SHPO Opinion: 7/19/1989 NJ Transit Main Line, Milepost 8.52, over Passaic River SHPO Opinion: 2/11/1997 Archaeological Site (28-Pa-39) (ID#3666) See Main Entry / Filed Location: Bound by US Route 46 and NJ Route 20 Bergen County, Lyndhurst Township SHPO Opinion: 7/19/1989 28-Pa-145 (ID#2327) Morris Canal (ID#2784) Dundee Canal Existing and former bed of the Morris Canal SHPO Opinion: 11/22/1991 NR: 10/1/1974 (NR Reference #: 74002228) (Previous SHPO Opinion 7/19/89) SR: 11/26/1973 (Extends from the Delaware River in Phillibsburg Town, Cedar Lawn Cemetery (ID#3669) Warren County to the Hudson River in Jersey City, Hudson SHPO Opinion: 10/18/1988 County.) Dundee Canal Industrial Historic District (ID#2351) See Main Entry / Filed Location: From George Street in Passaic north along Dundee Canal to headgates Warren County, Phillipsburg Town
    [Show full text]
  • VISTA PARK MASTER PLAN RESTORING RECREATIONAL USE OVERLOOKING PATERSON's HISTORIC AREA Paterson, New Jersey Acknowledgments
    VISTA PARK MASTER PLAN RESTORING RECREATIONAL USE OVERLOOKING PATERSON'S HISTORIC AREA Paterson, New Jersey Acknowledgments VISTA PARK PARTNERS National Park Service, Northeast Region Office Amanda Jones, Community Planner, Park Planning and Special State of New Jersey Studies Cathy Elliott-Shaw, Team Leader, Urban Acquisition and Statewide Park Development Team, New Jersey Green Helen Mahan, Chief, Conservation and Recreation Assistance Acres Program Collective Joshua Osowski, Northern Superintendent, New Jersey State Jeff Killion, Historical Landscape Architect, Olmsted Center for Park Service Landscape Preservation Amy Sumoski, New Jersey Green Acres Program VISTA PARK STAKEHOLDERS John Trontis, Assistant Director, New Jersey State Park Service (former) Jack DeStefano, Director, Paterson Museum City of Paterson Robin Gold, Program Director, Hamilton Partnership for Paterson Gianfranco Archimede, Director, Historic Preservation Bob Guarasci, President and CEO, New Jersey Community Ben-David Seligman, Law Department Development Corporation Chief Vincent Mann, Turtle Clan Chief, Ramapough Lunaape Nation Paterson Public Schools Nicholas A. Moretta, Special Assistant to the Leonard Zax, President and CEO, Hamilton Partnership for Paterson Executive Director Steve Morlind, Executive Director of Facilities CONTRACTOR TEAM Passaic County T.J. Best, Freeholder Elizabeth Clarke, Planner Kathleen M. Caren, Open Space Coordinator, Robert Forloney, Program Developer and Department of Planning and Economic Development Cultural Institution Consultant
    [Show full text]
  • Paterson Master Presentation May 2014
    Impact of Paterson’s Environment on Children Ralph W. Voorhees Center for Civic Engagement Kathe Newman Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Ryan Good Rutgers University Margaret Ricke 2014 Daniel Harris http://policy.rutgers.edu/rwv Jackob Schneider Introduction - Research Design • Research questions • What environmental, socio-economic, and contextual stressors affect children? • How do organizations mitigate these stressors and where are the services located? • What should organizations serving children know? ! • Research approach • Compiled and analyzed data producing more than 50 maps and charts • Profiled Paterson’s demographics • Identified more than 400 community organizations and produced a master map • Toured neighborhoods, community organizations, and attended meetings • Interviewed 26 Paterson leaders • Triangulated information from interviews, field visits, Census, and administrative data Non-School Barriers to Student Success in Paterson, NJ 2 Introduction - Common Themes Parent/caregiver engagement - More parent involvement in children’s lives will improve how they do in school and life ! Children’s programming and education - There is demand for more after-school and summer programming and improved ESL instruction ! Food security - Many children go hungry and lack food security (defined as access to healthy affordable food) ! Health - Health is important for children and parents alike and there are insufficient health services especially dental and mental health ! Housing - There is an inadequate supply
    [Show full text]