Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR-Planets 1 Tidal Response of Mars Constrained from Laboratory-based 2 Viscoelastic Dissipation Models and Geophysical Data 1 2;1 3 3 1 3 A. Bagheri , A. Khan , D. Al-Attar , O. Crawford , D. Giardini 1 4 Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland 2 5 Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland 3 6 Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 7 Key Points: • 8 We present a method for determining the planetary tidal response using laboratory- 9 based viscoelastic models and apply it to Mars. • 10 Maxwellian rheology results in considerably biased (low) viscosities and should be 11 used with caution when studying tidal dissipation. • 12 Mars’ rheology and interior structure will be further constrained from InSight mea- 13 surements of tidal phase lags at distinct periods. Corresponding author: Amirhossein Bagheri,
[email protected] –1– Confidential manuscript submitted to JGR-Planets 14 Abstract 15 We employ laboratory-based grain-size- and temperature-sensitive rheological models to 16 describe the viscoelastic behavior of terrestrial bodies with focus on Mars. Shear modulus 17 reduction and attenuation related to viscoelastic relaxation occur as a result of diffusion- 18 and dislocation-related creep and grain-boundary processes. We consider five rheological 19 models, including extended Burgers, Andrade, Sundberg-Cooper, a power-law approxima- 20 tion, and Maxwell, and determine Martian tidal response. However, the question of which 21 model provides the most appropriate description of dissipation in planetary bodies, re- 22 mains an open issue. To examine this, crust and mantle models (density and elasticity) are 23 computed self-consistently through phase equilibrium calculations as a function of pres- 24 sure, temperature, and bulk composition, whereas core properties are based on an Fe-FeS 25 parameterisation.