DOCSLIB.ORG

89-93 Newington Causeway in the London Borough of Southwark Planning Application No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
89-93 Newington Causeway in the London Borough of Southwark Planning Application No planning report PDU/2270/03 16 November 2011 89-93 Newington Causeway in the London Borough of Southwark planning application no. 09/AP/1940 Strategic planning application stage II referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal The demolition of the existing building and erection of a 22-storey mixed use building containing a cafe at ground level, with commercial floorspace and 38 residential units above. The applicant The applicant is Neobrand Limited, and the architect is Panter Hudspith Architects. Strategic issues The proposal is consistent with the London Plan. The Council’s decision In this instance Southwark Council has agreed a dual recommendation resolving to grant permission but giving delegated authority for officers to refuse permission if the Section 106 agreement is not signed within a specified date. Recommendation That Southwark Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 15 September 2009, the Mayor of London received documents from Southwark Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Category 1C of the Schedule of the Order 2008: ”Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building of one or more of the following descriptions…the building is more than 30 metres high and is outside the City of London”. 2 On 21 October 2009 the Mayor considered planning report PDU/2270/01, and subsequently advised Southwark Council that the application did not comply with the London page 1 Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 69 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 71 of that report could address these deficiencies. 3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. On 7 June 2011 Southwark Council agreed a dual recommendation resolving to grant permission but giving delegated authority for officers to refuse permission if the Section 106 agreement for the application is not signed on or before 30 June 2011. On 23 June 2011 it advised the Mayor of this decision and on 25 July 2011 the stage II referral was validated. 4 On 26 July 2011 the Mayor considered a report on this case (reference PDU/2270/02, copy attached), and resolved that he was content to allow Southwark Council to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and did not therefore wish to direct refusal or to take over the application for his own determination. 5 Southwark Council subsequently reconsidered the application. On 1 November 2011 Southwark Council agreed a dual recommendation resolving to grant permission but giving delegated authority for officers to refuse permission if the Section 106 agreement for the application is not signed on or before 30 November 2011. On 3 November 2011 it advised the Mayor of this decision. 6 Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged, direct Southwark Council under Article 6 to refuse the application or issue a direction to Southwark Council under Article 7 that he is to act as the Local Planning Authority for the purposes of determining the application and any connected application. The Mayor has until 16 November 2011 to notify the Council of his decision and to issue any direction. 7 The environmental information for the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 has been taken into account in the consideration of this case. 8 The decision on this case, and the reasons will be made available on the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk. Update 9 At the consultation stage Southwark Council was advised that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 69 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 71 of that report could address these deficiencies. On 26 July 2011 the Mayor considered a report on this case (reference PDU/2270/02, copy attached), which confirmed that the outstanding matters relating to housing, climate change adaptation and mitigation, and transport had been remedied and the application was considered to be consistent with the London Plan. This remains the case. Response to consultation 10 The consultation responses received by the Council and the Mayor prior to the report on 26 May 2011 are summarised in that report. Since then the Council and the Mayor have received further representations from the Ministry of Sound. The Ministry of Sound has also since closed an online petition on it’s website, which it reports has having in excess of 26,000 signatories. This specifically objected to the Eileen House proposal, albeit on the substantively the same grounds as the application in question. page 2 11 The further representations submitted on behalf of the Ministry of Sound maintain it’s objection to the proposal on a number of planning grounds. These grounds include the housing mix, building height, density, the nature of the amenity space and noise amenity issues all of which are highlighted as being contrary to Southwark policy. 12 The Ministry of Sound continues to be concerned regarding the inclusion of residential accommodation in the proposal as a potentially sensitive receptor of noise emanating from it’s Club premises on Gaunt Street, opposite the application site. Specifically it remains concerned that should it’s operations give rise to any noise disturbance to future residents then those residents would have legitimate grounds for a nuisance compliant to the Council which could in turn curtail or revoke the it’s entertainment license, resulting in a loss of business. 13 The applicant, the Ministry of Sound and the Council have each sought the assistance of specialist acousticians and given extensive consideration to the potential for noise disturbance to future residents of the proposal. There remains dispute over this issue. The Council has however addressed the concerns raised regarding the coverage of it’s own acoustic survey completed in April 2011. This survey terminated at 00.00 and did not cover the period between 02.00 and 04.00 that the Ministry of Sound asserts are it’s busiest and noisiest or any noise arising from patrons leaving the nightclub which can occur until around 07.00. 14 The Council duly conducted a further survey on the night of 23-24 July 2011 which covered this period. It has since concluded that: “…provided that sound insulation measures and alternative means of ventilation are required by condition, the likely effects of MoS [Ministry of Sound] will have been appropriately minimised and are not likely to give rise to unacceptable disturbance to future occupiers. Future occupiers would have the ability to close their windows and obtain a quiet internal environment with fresh air provided by means of alternative mechanical ventilation. It is considered that the activities of MoS would not give rise to unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers and that the relevant policy standards are attained.” 15 This conclusion and the associated conditions attached to the draft decision notice have been reviewed and do not raise any concern, subject to these conditions being enforced. On this basis the further representations raise no material planning issues of strategic importance that have not been appropriately addressed and duly considered by the Mayor. Article 7: Direction that the Mayor is to be the local planning authority 16 Under Article 7 of the Order the Mayor could take over this application provided the policy tests set out in that Article are met. In this instance the Council has agreed a dual recommendation resolving to grant permission with conditions and a planning obligation but giving delegated authority for officers to refuse permission if the Section 106 agreement for the application is not signed. This satisfactorily addresses the matters raised at stage I, therefore there is no sound planning reason for the Mayor to take over this application. Legal considerations 17 Under the arrangements set out in Article 5 of the Town and Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor has the power under Article 6 to direct the local planning authority to refuse permission for a planning application referred to him under Article 4 of the Order. He also has the power to issue a direction under Article 7 that he is to act as the local planning authority for the purpose of determining the application and any connected application. The page 3 Mayor may also leave the decision to the local authority. In directing refusal the Mayor must have regard to the matters set out in Article 6(2) of the Order, including the principal purposes of the Greater London Authority, the effect on health and sustainable development, national policies and international obligations, regional planning guidance, and the use of the River Thames. The Mayor may direct refusal if he considers that to grant permission would be contrary to good strategic planning in Greater London. If he decides to direct refusal, the Mayor must set out his reasons, and the local planning authority must issue these with the refusal notice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newington Causeway, SE1 Elephant & Castle
    Newington Causeway, SE1 £390.00 pw Elephant & Castle 2 2 • Two Double Bedrooms • Two Bathrooms • 24hr Concierge • Gymnasium • Parking • Gated Development • Secondary Glazing • Wood Floors • Recently Refurbished • Modern Newly Fitted Kitchen A spacious second floor apartment forms part of the popular grade 2 listed development Metro Central Heights. The property comprises of a super modern open plan kitchen/lounge, two double bedrooms and two bathrooms all enjoying views of the new retail stands that is set on the new extended pedestrianised area by the roundabout. Residents benefit from the use of a fully equipped gym, swimming pool, steam room and Jacuzzi as well as residents' parking. There is a 24 hour concierge at the reception making this development most secure. Offered in good decorative order throughout and is offered furnished or unfurnished. To arrange a viewing for this property please call us on: 020 7261 1103 A: 54 Southwark Bridge Road, London, SE1 0AR T: 020 7261 1103 F: 020 7401 2007 W: www.nelsonssales.com Property images: To arrange a viewing for this property please call us on: 020 7261 1103 A: 54 Southwark Bridge Road, London, SE1 0AR T: 020 7261 1103 F: 020 7401 2007 W: www.nelsonssales.com Floor Plans To arrange a viewing for this property please call us on: 020 7261 1103 A: 54 Southwark Bridge Road, London, SE1 0AR T: 020 7261 1103 F: 020 7401 2007 W: www.nelsonssales.com Location Important Notice These details have been prepared and issued in good faith and do not constitute representations of fact or form of any offer or contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Linkslinks –– a a Walkingwalking && Cyclingcycling Networknetwork Forfor Southwsouthwarkark
    GreenGreen LinksLinks –– A A WalkingWalking && CyclingCycling NetworkNetwork forfor SouthwSouthwarkark www.southwarklivingstreets.org.uk 31st31st MarchMarch 20102010 www.southwarkcyclists.org.uk Contents. Proposed Green Links - Overview Page Introduction 3 What is a Green Link? 4 Objectives of the Project 5 The Nature of the Network 6 The Routes in Detail 7 Funding 18 Appendix – Map of the Green Links Network 19 2 (c) Crown Cop yright. All rights reserved ((0)100019252) 2009 Introduction. • Southwark Living Streets and Southwark Cyclists have developed a proposal for a network of safe walking and cycling routes in Southwark. • This has been discussed in broad outline with Southwark officers and elements of it have been presented to some Community Councils. • This paper sets out the proposal, proposes next steps and invites comments. 3 What is a Green Link? Planting & Greenery Biodiverse Connects Local Safe & Attractive Amenities Cycle Friendly Pedestrian Friendly Surrey Canal Path – Peckham Town Centre to Burgess Park 4 Objectives. • The purpose of the network is to create an alternative to streets that are dominated by vehicles for residents to get about the borough in a healthy, safe and pleasant environment in their day-to-day journeys for work, school shopping and leisure. • The routes are intended to provide direct benefits… - To people’s physical and mental health. - In improving the environment in terms of both air and noise. - By contributing to the Council meeting its climate change obligations, by offering credible and attractive alternatives to short car journeys. - Encouraging people make a far greater number and range of journeys by walking and cycling. • More specifically the network is designed to: - Take advantage of Southwark’s many large and small parks and open spaces, linking them by routes which are safe, and perceived to be safe, for walking and cycling.
    [Show full text]
  • Byelaws for Parks and Open Spaces
    London Borough of Southwark BYELAWS FOR PLEASURE GROUNDS, PUBLIC WALKS AND OPEN SPACES ARRANGEMENT OF BYELAWS PART 1 GENERAL 1. General interpretation 2. Application 3. Opening times PART 2 PROTECTION OF THE GROUND, ITS WILDLIFE AND THE PUBLIC 4. Protection of structures and plants 5. Unauthorised erection of structures 6. Climbing 7. Grazing 8. Protection of wildlife 9. Fires 10. Missiles 11. Interference with life-saving equipment PART 3 HORSES AND CYCLES 12. Horses 13. Cycling PART 4 PLAY AREAS, GAMES AND SPORTS 14. Interpretation of Part 4 15. Children’s play areas 16. Children’s play apparatus 17. Skateboarding, etc 18. Cricket 19. Archery 20. Field sports 21. Golf PART 5 WATERWAYS 22. Interpretation of Part 5 23. Bathing 24. Ice skating 25. Boats 26. Fishing 27. Pollution 28. Blocking of watercourses PART 6 MODEL AIRCRAFT 29. Interpretation of Part 6 30. Model aircraft PART 7 OTHER REGULATED ACTIVITIES 31. Provision of services 32. Excessive noise 33. Aircraft, hang-gliders and hot air balloons 34. Kites PART 8 MISCELLANEOUS 35. Obstruction 36. Savings 37. Removal of offenders 38. Penalty 39. Revocation SCHEDULE 1 - Grounds to which byelaws apply generally SCHEDULE 2 - Grounds referred to in certain byelaws 2 Byelaws made under section 164 of the Public Health Act 1875 and sections 12 and 15 of the Open Spaces Act 1906 by the London Borough of Southwark with respect to pleasure grounds, public walks and open spaces. PART 1 GENERAL General Interpretation 1. In these byelaws: “the Council” means the London Borough of Southwark; “the
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Budget Virements and Variations 2020/21 Outturn Monitor
    Appendix C - Budget virements and variations 2020/21 outturn monitor Children's and Southwark General Fund Housing Total Adult Social Environment Housing and Chief Project Name Children's Adults' Schools for the Programme Investment Programmed Care and Leisure Modernisation Executive's Services Future Total Programme Expenditure £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ CURRENT PROGRAMME AT MONTH 8 2020-21 84,503,990 32,947,378 117,451,368 5,489,177 132,103,138 78,645,905 241,018,066 574,707,654 2,093,902,747 2,668,610,401 OUTTURN VIREMENTS TO BE APPROVED Environment and Leisure Peckham Ward (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) Nunhead & Peckham Rye - CGS 15,000 15,000 15,000 Newington Gardens 48,352 48,352 48,352 Peckham Pulse Option 1 & 2 1,500 1,500 1,500 OLF SSG Disability Multi-Sports Court (1,500) (1,500) (1,500) Monuments & Memorials in the Public Realm 27,648 27,648 27,648 Structures Capital Programme (27,648) (27,648) (27,648) Climate Emergency 25,000,000 25,000,000 25,000,000 Enid Street Play Area 49,744 49,744 49,744 OLF SSG Disability Multi-Sports Court (342,000) (342,000) (342,000) OLF Southwark Athletics Centre 342,000 342,000 342,000 Bevington Street 55,755 55,755 55,755 Community Playspaces 669,693 669,693 669,693 - - Chief Executive's Enid Street Play Area (49,744) (49,744) (49,744) Bevington Street (55,755) (55,755) (55,755) Community Playspaces (669,693) (669,693) (669,693) Grove Lane Pocket Place 53,465 53,465 53,465 Lordship Lane Traffic (46,940) (46,940) (46,940) Demonstrator Zones (34,100) (34,100) (34,100) Deliver Walking Network 19,108 19,108
    [Show full text]
  • Land Bounded by Borough Road, Newington Causeway and Railway Viaduct
    Briefing for TNRA committee on planning application 14-AP-3130 Borough Triangle - land bounded by Borough Road, Newington Causeway and railway viaduct 02.02.15 Adam Towle Application for: Demolition of 69-76 and 83 Borough Road, 18-26, 38, 40-42, 44-46 and 56-62 Newington Causeway and warehouse buildings to the rear of 40-42 Newington Causeway; change of use of 82 Borough Road from Class D1 Use to Class A1- A3/B1/D1 and D2 Uses and redevelopment to provide a mixed-use development comprising eight buildings ranging from 4 to 38 storeys in height (+22.820m - +123.850 AOD) providing 529 residential units (Class C3), 9,950.5sqm of office use (Class B1), 167sqm of retail use (Class A1-A3), 2,029sqm flexible use (Class A1-A3, B1 or D1), 4,072sqm of night club use (Sui Generis), 96 basement car parking spaces together with access, hard and soft landscaping and other associated works incidental to the development. http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root .PgeDocs&TheSystemkey=9556404 Selected comments from Conservation Areas Advisory Group held on Monday 19 January 2015. 1. The scheme was thought to be generally “pretty grim”: heavy, dominant and oppressive and lacking character and variety of architectural treatment. 2. It was noted that the towers lie in a “gateway“ and “transitional” zone outside the actual area designated for high buildings in the council’s E&C SPD tall buildings strategy and in the current Southwark Plan. 3. The height of the towers was thought excessive but, if towers of the height proposed are acceptable to Southwark, then the set-back siting of the two southern towers was considered appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Where You Headed?
    RESTAURANTS, BARS & CAFÉS SHOPS & SALONS AOBABA LA BARRA CASTLE SQUARE EAST STREET MARKET 01 17 01 03 VIETNAMESE COLOMBIAN MARKET 130–138 WALWORTH ROAD, SE17 1RW 147 EAGLE YARD ARCH, SE1 6SP AA GROCERY STORE EAST STREET, SE17 1EL GROCERY STORE BAYROOT – COMING SOON TOULOUSE LAUTREC ELEPHANT ARCADE – COMING SOON 02 18 CASTLE SQUARE, SE17 1EN 04 LEBANESE BRASSERIE & PIANO BAR ACCESSORIES, CLOTHES & BEAUTY STALLS 15A SAYER STREET, SE17 1FY 140 NEWINGTON BUTTS, SE11 4RN ANNA CASTRO BOUTIQUE FASHION TEKKROOM BEZA VEGAN FOOD LA CALEÑITA PRINTING AND TECH REPAIR SERVICES 03 19 CASTLE SQUARE, SE17 1EN VEGAN COLOMBIAN ELEPHANT ARCADE, SE1 6ET 8A SAYER STREET, SE17 1FH ARCH 143, MALDONADO WALK, SE1 6SP AR ACCESSORIES ACCESSORIES LUCY’S WHERE YOU BOBO SOCIAL LATIN GROOVE HAIR AND BEAUTY 04 20 CASTLE SQUARE, SE17 1EN BURGERS COLOMBIAN ELEPHANT ARCADE, SE1 6ET 23 SAYER STREET, SE17 1FY 118–138 WALWORTH ROAD, SE17 1JY AYCA SWEETS & NUTS JD SPORTS SWEETS & NUTS 05 CASA COLOMBIA MCDONALDS FASHION 05 21 CASTLE SQUARE, SE17 1EN COLOMBIAN FAST FOOD 277–279 WALWORTH ROAD, SE17 2TG HEADED? ARCH 141, HAMPTON STREET, SE1 6SP 198/200 WALWORTH ROAD, SE17 1JJ D & EDDY’S MENS URBAN FASHION SPECSAVERS MENS FASHION 06 CASTLE SQUARE MIKO’S – COMING SOON OPTICIANS 06 22 CASTLE SQUARE, SE17 1EN FROM FAMILIAR FACES TO CREATIVE JUICES, MEET, TASTE, ECUADOREAN 226 WALWORTH ROAD, SE17 1JE COMA Y BEBA SAYER STREET, SE17 1FY GAMES & GADGETS TRY AND DISCOVER A PLACE THAT NEVER PRESSES PAUSE. SPORTS DIRECT COLOMBIAN ELECTRONICS 07 SO, WHERE YOU HEADED ELEPHANT? NANDO’S FASHION
    [Show full text]
  • The Collaborative City
    the londoncollaborative The Collaborative City Working together to shape London’s future March 2008 THE PROJECT The London Collaborative aims to increase the capacity of London’s public sector to respond to the key strategic challenges facing the capital. These include meeting the needs of a growing, increasingly diverse and transient population; extending prosperity while safe- guarding cohesion and wellbeing, and preparing for change driven by carbon reduction. For more information visit young- foundation.org/london Abbey Wood Abchurch Lane Abchurch Yard Acton Acton Green Adams Court Addington Addiscombe Addle Hill Addle Street Adelphi Wharf Albion Place Aldborough Hatch Alder- manbury Aldermanbury Square Alderman’s Walk Alders- brook Aldersgate Street Aldersgate Street Aldgate Aldgate Aldgate High Street Alexandra Palace Alexandra Park Allhal- lows and Stairs Allhallows Lane Alperton Amen Corner Amen CornerThe Amen Collaborative Court America Square City Amerley Anchor Wharf Angel Working Angel Court together Angel to Court shape Angel London’s Passage future Angel Street Arkley Arthur Street Artillery Ground Artillery Lane Artillery AperfieldLane Artillery Apothecary Passage Street Arundel Appold Stairs StreetArundel Ardleigh Street Ashen Green- tree CourtFORE WAustinORD Friars Austin Friars Passage4 Austin Friars Square 1 AveINTRO MariaDUctio LaneN Avery Hill Axe Inn Back6 Alley Back of Golden2 Square OVerVie WBalham Ball Court Bandonhill 10 Bank Bankend Wharf Bankside3 LONDON to BarbicanDAY Barking Barkingside12 Barley Mow Passage4
    [Show full text]
  • Street and Property List for the Whole District
    Tendring District Council Street & Property List Street Name # PD Ref Street Name # PD Ref Aldeburgh Close 15 AA Dedham Avenue 49 AA 1-9(Odd); 9A; 11; 15-19(Odd); 2-10(Even) 1-11(Odd); 15-49(Odd); 2-50(Even) Battisford Drive 86 AA Fairclough Avenue 22 AA 1-11(Odd); 15-59(Odd); 2-50(Even); 1-12(Cont) Grange Court; 14-33(Cont) Grange Court 1-11(Odd); 15-33(Odd); 16-26(Even) Bawdsey Close 21 AA Farmers Way 16 AA 1-7(Odd); 2-34(Even) 1-11(Odd); 15-17(Odd); 2-16(Even) Benhall Close 8 AA Felixstowe Close 16 AA 1-5(Odd); 2-4(Even); 12-16(Even) 1-11(Odd); 15-17(Odd); 2-16(Even) Bluehouse Avenue 28 AA Flatford Drive 132 AA 37A-39A(Odd); 41; 41A-43A(Odd); 58-70(Even); Flat 1 1-11(Odd); 15-69(Odd); 69A; 71-115(Odd); 2-148(Even) Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 10 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 11 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 12 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 13 Hadleigh Road 31 AA Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 14 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 15 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 16 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 2 1-11(Odd); 15-23(Odd); 2-40(Even) Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 3 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 4 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 5 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 6 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 7 Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 8 Hawkendon Road 31 AA Hazeldene Gardens; Flat 9 Hazeldene Gardens 1-11(Odd); 15-29(Odd); 2-34(Even) Boxted Avenue 84 AA Holbrook Close 22 AA 1-11(Odd); 15-17(Odd); 19C; 19; 19A; 19B; 19D; 19E; 1; 5-11(Odd); 15-33(Odd); 2-14(Even) 21-91(Odd); 2-68(Even) Kersey Drive 30 AA Burstall Close 15 AA 1-11(Odd); 15-29(Odd); 2-32(Even) 1-11(Odd); 15-21(Odd); 2-10(Even) Langham Drive 95 AA Carters Close 28 AA 1-11(Odd);
    [Show full text]
  • LSBU Bermondsey Walking Route
    The Statistics Sustainability and You This walk aims to encourage a ‘sustainable lifestyle’ by recognising the connection between Sustainability and 5000 Health and Well-being. The health benefits from walking are regularly emphasised by the NHS, who recommend taking This walk should The approximate The walk is an average of 10,000 steps a day to reduce the risk of type 2 take around step count is 5000 approximately diabetes, various cancers and heart disease. 45-50 minutes steps –half of the 2.5miles (4km). to complete at a recommended Additionally, the walks are a chance to improve mental moderate pace. amount for an wellbeing. If your job involves sitting in an indoor entire day. environment all day, it is important to get outside, move around and mentally refresh yourself. However, being in a densely populated, and at times, heavily polluted area Have the Time to Stop? like Central London means that sustainable living can be a difficult goal. This is why we have included various open If you have the opportunity to stop along your way, you green spaces to visit and enjoy. Not only are these spaces rich could always pick up a bite to eat on campus or you might in biodiversity and provide some tranquillity and cleaner air, wish to revisit the route after work in order to eat at a local but they also offer a connection to the past and present local business. If so, then here are some of our favourites! community. The Roebuck Safety 50 Great Dover Street • Wear comfortable walking shoes or trainers that provide This Victorian pub with a rustic interior offers 100% locally adequate support.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 27Th June 1986
    8600 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 27TH JUNE 1986 Sawyer Street Thrale Street Hatfields, so much as lies within the London Borough Scoresby Street Treveris Street of Southwark. Scovell Road Uffprd Street Hayles Street Short Street Union Street Holland Street Silex Street Valentine Place Holyoak Road, so much as lies within the London Borough Southwark Bridge Road Webber Row of Southwark. Southwark Street Weller Street Hopton Street Sumner Street West Square Horse Shoe Alley Surrey Row Isabella Street SCHEDULE 4 Streets or parts of streets for the purpose of the definition Joan Street of " Resident" Keyworth Place America Street Keyworth Street Austral Street King Edward Walk, so much as lies within the London Ayres Street Borough of Southwark. King James Street Bank End King's Bench Street Bankside King's Court Barge House Street Baron's Place Bear Gardens Lambeth Road, so much as lies within the London Borough Bear Lane of Southwark. Bedale Street Lamlash Street Belvedere Buildings Lancaster Street Bennett's Mews Lant Street Bittern Street Lavington Street Blackfriars Road Leigh Hunt Street Borough High Street, the north-west side. Library Street Borough Road Little Dorrit Court Boundary Row Loman Street Boyfield Street London Road Broadwall, so much as lies within the London Borough of Longville Road Southwark. Maidstone Buildings Brook Drive, so much as lies within the London Borough Marshalsea Road of Southwark. Meymott Street Burrell Street Milcote Street Burrows Mews Mint Street Caleb Street Montague Close Calvert's Buildings Morley Street, so much as lies within the London Borough Canvey Street of Southwark. Castle Yard Cathedral Stieet Nelson Square Chancel Street Newington Butts, the north-west side, between its junction Churchyard Row with Elephant and Castle and the north-eastern kerb- Clennam Street line of Dante Road.
    [Show full text]
  • TWO FIFTY ONE Southwark Bridge Road Is an Elegant 41-Storey
    CGI – INDICATIVE VIEW OF TWO FIFTY ONE FACING TOWARDS THE CITY OF LONDON TWO FIFTY ONE Southwark Bridge Road is an elegant 41-storey residential tower in a Zone One Southwark location, between Vauxhall Bridge and Tower Bridge, within the Elephant & Castle regeneration area. Designed by award-winning Southwark architects Allies and Morrison. TWO FIFTY ONE is closer to central London than both Vauxhall and Nine Elms. The stunning tower offers apartments at exceptional value for both owner-occupiers and investors. Within minutes of Westminster, the West End and the City, TWO FIFTY ONE is near to the South Bank and benefits from superb transport connections to central London and major national/international transport hubs. Developer Tenure Building Insurance Oakmayne Properties in conjunction 999 year leasehold 10 - year new home warranty with Lone Star Real Estate Fund III Anticipated Completion Bicycle Parking Location Quarter 4 2017 Bicycle bay within a secure 251 Southwark Bridge Road London SE1 Architect basement for every apartment Local Authority Allies and Morrison. London Borough of Southwark 01 CONNECTED LIKE NO OTHER Close to TWO FIFTY ONE is the South Bank, featuring the National Theatre, Tate Modern, White Cube Gallery and In a well-connected location close to Elephant & Castle, Southwark, Waterloo and the South Bank, TWO FIFTY ONE Shad Thames. Borough Market, a centre for gourmet food and fine restaurants, is also within walking distance. In addition, will be one of the most architecturally advanced, unique and striking developments in Southwark. Southwark features the renowned Ministry of Sound* night club on Gaunt Street, the long-established Coronet Theatre – and ‘The Castle’, which is the new Elephant and Castle leisure centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Elephant and Castle Site Allocations
    Representation Officer Response NSP42: Newington Triangle Organisation: Elephant Amenity Network NSPPSV57.17 The site visions and uses are unsound because they fail to meet evidenced need. To be sound Any proposal coming forward will be assessed against the they should be amended as follows: development plan. A number of these points are addressed • When referring to new homes, a significant proportion should be social rented housing. in other policies of the Plan. P1 (Affordable homes) sets out • Where retail is provided, a proportion of these should be replacement units for traders further information on the affordable housing relocated from site 47. requirements; P29 (Small shops) sets out the requirement • Where open space is referred to, this should be described as green space unless there will be with regards to small shops and P44 (Community uses) sets hard standing, in which this should be open and transparent out the requirement with regards to community facilities. • All sites should include small business space. P28: Affordable workspaces will contribute to the • All sites should include community facilities. protection of existing local retailers, in conjunction with policy P38: Business Relocation. Replacement employment In accordance with the Site Allocations methodology paper, we asked for meetings with the floorspace is specified in accordance with the Employment Council officers (at preferred options stage) to discuss how these changes to the site allocations Land Review. We encourage sites to deliver open space as could be achieved. We received no response from the Council, which is a further example of green spaces with parks and playspace facilities where consultation failings under the legal requirements.
    [Show full text]