DOCSLIB.ORG

Download.Html Worldmap: Http

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download.Html Worldmap: Http PROTECTED AREAS in NORTHERN CANADA Designing for Ecological Integrity Yolanda F. Wiersma, Thomas J. Beechey, Bas M. Oosenbrug, John C. Meikle Protected Areas in Northern Canada: Designing for Ecological Integrity Phase 1 Report Yolanda F. Wiersma, Thomas J. Beechey, Bas M. Oosenbrug, John C. Meikle Canadian Council on Ecological Areas CCEA Occasional Paper No. 16 Protected Areas in Northern Canada: Designing for Ecological Integrity Phase 1 Report Phase 1: A literature review and summary of science-based approaches for protected area design with a survey and assessment of existing protected areas, current practices and future needs. The full citation for this report is: Wiersma, Yolanda F, Thomas J. Beechey, Bas M. Oosenbrug and John C. Meikle. 2005. Protected Areas in Northern Canada: Designing for Ecological Integrity. Phase 1 Report. CCEA Occasional Paper No. 16. Canadian Council on Ecological Areas, CCEA Secretariat, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. xiv + 128 pp. + folded map. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Protected areas in northern Canada: designing for ecological integrity/Yolanda F. Wiersma (et al.). Includes bibliographic references ISBN 0-7708-0147-1 1. Protected areas—Canada, Northern. I. Wiersma, Yolanda F. (Yolanda Francine), 1973- II. Canadian Council on Ecological Areas QH77.C3P745 2005 333.78’209719 C2006-901362-4 ©2005 Canadian Council on Ecological Areas Canadian Council on Ecological Areas Secretariat: c/o Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada 3rd fl oor, 351 St. Joseph Boulevard, Gatineau, QC K1A 0H3 Printed on recycled paper Printed and bound in Canada Cover: Moose (Alces alces) is a symbol of Canada’s northern forests, Frances Lake, Yukon (Photo by J. Meikle) CCEA Mission The Canadian Council on Ecological Areas (CCEA) is an independent national organization constituted in 1982 to encourage and to facilitate the selection, protection and stewardship of a comprehensive network of protected areas in Canada. In 1995, CCEA became a registered charitable organization. The Council draws its following and support from First Nations and Inuit peoples, federal, provincial and territorial government agencies, non-governmental organizations, universities, industry and private citizens concerned with protected areas. The goal of CCEA is to facilitate and to assist Canadians with the establishment, management and use of a comprehensive viable network of protected areas that represents the diversity of Canada’s terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems. To that end, the work of CCEA is centred on the following activities: 1. Promoting the value of protected areas for conserving biodiversity and for helping to sustain ecosystems for the environmental, social and economic well being of all Canadians; 2. Providing scientifi c advice and guidance in the design of a nation-wide network of protected areas incorporating both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and the selection of areas to complete it; 3. Advancing sound ecological and science-based stewardship practices for protected areas including the management, restoration and use of them for conservation, science, education and heritage appreciation; 4. Assisting in determining the administrative and institutional arrangements for the securement, protection, management and use of protected areas; 5. Communicating and working with regional, national and international interests toward the achievement of Council’s goal and objectives; 6. Monitoring and reporting on initiatives and progress regarding the establishment, conservation, management and use of protected areas; and, 7. Conducting other such work and activities as may be necessary to support these aims. For more information, visit the CCEA website: www.ccea.org Dedication Dr. J. Stan Rowe June 11, 1918 – April 6, 2004 CCEA colleagues and associates will long remember Dr. J. Stan Rowe, who passed away peacefully at home on April 6, 2004. Widely known for his book, Forest Regions of Canada, Dr. Rowe gained special notoriety for his later writings on ethics and conservation, which demonstrate his intimate insight of ecology and the caring attitude that we need to adopt as environmental stewards. Dr. Rowe’s notions of ecological sustainability and stewardship, so eloquently portrayed in his popular work, Home Place: Essays in Ecology, and his other writings, offer illuminating guidance for Canadian conservation efforts. Among his many contributions to conservation, CCEA associates are especially indebted to Dr. Rowe for his early involvement in promoting protected areas and helping to establish the Council to advance this important mission. Dr. Rowe’s environmental philosophy and reverence for Nature, embodied in his actions and his writings, are nowhere more applicable than in efforts to conserve Canada’s North. This report is dedicated as a tribute to Stan Rowe, with special thanks and appreciation for his vision and leadership that are a true inspiration for preserving wilderness in Canada. Acknowledgements This report refl ects over a year of collaboration between the authors, associates of the Canadian Council on Ecological Areas, and protected areas planners, managers and directors across the country. The CCEA Executive provided encouragement and support throughout the project. The Governments of Canada, Alberta, Northwest Territories and Yukon provided funding for research and production of the report. The report would not have been possible without the thoughtful and generous time given by the following survey respondents, who provided refl ective input to the comprehensive questionnaire (Appendix D) reported on in section 4. Yvonne Beaubien, Protected Areas Initiative, Manitoba Conservation Fred Beek, Resource Stewardship Branch, Saskatchewan Environment Bill Crins, Ontario Parks, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Christine Doucet, Inland Fish and Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Cameron Eckert, Yukon Parks Branch, Department of the Environment, Yukon Government Sian French, Parks and Natural Areas Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Vincent Gerardin, Ministère de l’Environment du Québec, Direction du patrimoine écologique et du développement durable Joyce Gould, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development Ken Harris, Habitat Conservation Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service Katie Hayhurst, Yukon Parks Branch, Department of the Environment, Yukon Government Helios Hernandez, Parks and Natural Areas Branch, Manitoba Conservation Steve Holmes, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada Afan Jones, Yukon Parks Branch, Department of the Environment, Yukon Government Paul Latour, Prairie and Northern Region, Canadian Wildlife Service David Livingstone, Renewable Resources and Environment, Department of Indian and Northern Affairs and Development Ken Mallet, Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada Brenda McAfee, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada Dan Mulrooney, Ontario Parks, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources David Monteith, Parks and Conservation Areas, Government of Nunavut Bas Oosenbrug, Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories Dan Paleczny, Ontario Parks, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Brian Pelchat, Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch, Department of the Environment, Government of Yukon Jacques Perron, Ministère de l’Environment du Québec, Direction du patrimoine écologique et du développement durable Protected Areas in Northern Canada: Designing for Ecological Integrity v Floyd Phillips, Wildlife and Ecosystem Protection Branch, Manitoba Conservation Wayne Schick, Parks Branch, Saskatchewan Environment Carol Sheedy, Eastern Canada Directorate, Parks Canada Agency Jason Simms, Marine Protected Areas Program, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Newfoundland and Labrador Glen Suggett, Wildlife and Ecosystem Protection Branch, Manitoba Conservation Erik Val, Yukon Parks Branch, Department of the Environment, Yukon Government Duane West, Western Canada Directorate, Parks Canada Agency Rob Wright, Forest Ecosystem Branch, Saskatchewan Environment A draft of the report was made available for review to academics, practitioners and environmental NGOs interested in protected areas in Canada. We thank the following individuals who volunteered their time to provide a careful and thoughtful review of the draft report. Bill Crins, Ontario Parks, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Pauline de Jong, Northwest Territories Protected Areas Strategy Secretariat Alan Fehr, Western Arctic Field Unit, Parks Canada Agency Sian French, Parks and Natural Areas Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Frances Gertsch, Ecological Integrity Branch, Parks Canada Agency Joyce Gould, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development Katie Hayhurst, Yukon Parks Branch, Department of the Environment, Yukon Government Alain Hébert, Ministère des Resources Naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs, Government of Québec Helios Hernandez, Parks and Natural Areas Branch, Manitoba Conservation Jim Johnston, Director General, Parks Canada Agency Paul Latour, Prairie and Northern Region, Canadian Wildlife Service Nicole Lights, Parks and Natural Areas Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Gordon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annexes Du Rapport Principal
    Nature et tourisme : L’écotourisme au Québec en 2002 Annexes du rapport principal Rapport produit par Éco Tour Conseils Etc. Maurice Couture, Adm. A. avec la collaboration de Sébastien Cloutier Tourisme Québec Table de concertation sur l’écotourisme au Québec Octobre 2002 Octobre 2002/ Nature et tourisme : L’écotourisme au Québec en 2002 Liste des annexes Annexe « A » : Fiches descriptives des principales ressources écotouristiques par région administrative Annexe « B » : Information sur l’offre d’une sélection de producteurs « spécialisés » en écotourisme du Québec Annexe « C » : Sélection de membres d’Aventure et Écotourisme Québec offrant des produits d’écotourisme Annexe « D » : Villages présentant des potentiels comme étape d’un circuit d’écotourisme ou comme lieu de séjour à proximité de milieux naturels Annexe E : Description des 150 produits offerts à destination du Canada à partir du site Web iExplore Annexe « F » : Exemples de produits concurrents au niveau international Annexe « G » : Exemples de produits offerts par des organismes internationaux de conservation Annexe « H » : Exemples de produits concurrents ailleurs au Canada Annexe « I » : Produits touristiques autochtones liés à de l’écotourisme ou du tourisme de nature Annexe « J » : Contenus descriptifs des guides touristiques 2001-2002 des ATR du Québec liés aux produits de tourisme de nature et d’écotourisme du Québec Annexe « K » : Contenus promotionnels des guides touristiques 2001- 2002 des ATR du Québec concernant les produits de tourisme de nature et
    [Show full text]
  • C S a S S C C S
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2010/066 Document de recherche 2010/066 Ecosystem status and trends report: Rapport de l’état des écosystèmes et Arctic Marine Ecozones des tendances : écozones marines de l’Arctique Andrea Niemi, Joclyn Paulic and Don Cobb Fisheries and Oceans Canada / Pêches et Océans Canada Central & Arctic Region / Région du Centre et de l’Arctique 501 University Crescent / 501, University Crescent Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N6 This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle the day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) ISSN 1919-5044 (Online / En ligne) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIÈRES ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 to 2023 Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement
    2016 TO 2023 INUIT IMPACT AND BENEFIT AGREEMENT FOR NATIONAL WILDLIFE AREAS AND MIGRATORY BIRD SANCTUARIES IN THE NUNAVUT SETTLEMENT AREA 2016–2023 ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᐊᕐᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐃᑲᔫᓯᐊᖅᑖᕈᓐᓇᐅᑎᖏᓐᓄᓪᓗ ᐊᖏᕈᑏᑦ ᐱᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᓂᕐᔪᑎᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑎᑭᑕᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᓂᑦ ᓴᐳᓐᓂᐊᕐᕕᑦ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᓄᓇᖁᑎᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐊᕙᑖᓂᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᓄᓇᖁᑎᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᑭᒡᒐᖅᑐᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᑎᒃ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᑐᖓᕕᒃ ᑎᒥᖓ, ᕿᑎᕐᒥᐅᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ, ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᕿᑭᖅᑕᓂ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑯᐃᓐ ᐱᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖓ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᑭᒡᒐᖅᑐᖅᑎᒋᓪᓗᒍ ᒥᓂᔅᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᓄᑦ BETWEEN The Inuit of the Nunavut Settlement Area represented by Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. The Kitikmeot Inuit Association The Kivalliq Inuit Association The Qikiqtani Inuit Association AND Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment Table of Contents 2016 INUIT IMPACT AND BENEFIT AGREEMENT FOR NATIONAL WILDLIFE AREAS AND MIGRATORY BIRD SANCTUARIES IN THE NUNAVUT SETTLEMENT AREA . 03 ARTICLE 1 — Definitions . 04 ARTICLE 2 — General Provisions . 08 ARTICLE 3 — Co-Management . 14 ARTICLE 4 — Inuit Owned Lands . 23 ARTICLE 5 — Inuit Rights And Uses Of NWAs And MBSs . 27 ARTICLE 6 — Information, Materials And Facilities . 30 ARTICLE 7 — Tourism And Other Business Benefits . 35 ARTICLE 8 — Inuit Contracting And Business Opportunities . 37 ARTICLE 9 — Education And Employment . 40 ARTICLE 10 — Research . 43 ARTICLE 11 — Cultural And Heritage Resources . 46 ARTICLE 12 — Wildlife Resources . 48 ARTICLE 13 — Changes To MBSs And NWAs . 51 ARTICLE 14 — Visitor Access And Use . 55 ARTICLE 15 — Implementation, Review And Renegotiation . 57 ARTICLE 16 — Dispute Resolution
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL/FINANCE COMMITTEE Wednesday, March 10, 2021
    AGENDA - GENERAL/FINANCE COMMITTEE Wednesday, March 10, 2021 A Regular Meeting of the General/Finance Committee will be held on Wednesday, March 10, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., electronically from the Council Chambers, Municipal Offices, Port Carling, Ontario. NOTICE: This meeting will be held ELECTRONICALLY from the Council Chambers, Municipal Office, Port Carling, Ontario, in accordance with section 238 of the Municipal Act, 2001. As part of the Township’s response to stop the spread of COVID-19, the Municipal Office remains closed to the public until further notice. Members of the public may observe the proceedings by accessing the live webcast at: https://www.youtube.com Closed Session shall be conducted in the absence of the public and shall not be webcast or video recorded. If the live webcast fails, the meeting recording will be posted at: https://muskokalakes.civicweb.net/Portal/ Public participation in this Electronic Meeting may occur through viewing the webcast and/or providing comment regarding specific agenda items at the following email address. Please ensure that the specific agenda item is identified in the subject line of your email. [email protected] Following the publishing of this agenda, public comments (maximum 2 minutes on any agenda item) may be provided by registering with the Clerk or designate by emailing [email protected] by 9:00 a.m. on March 9, 2021. If registrations are received, the Clerk or designate will issue a Supplementary Agenda pursuant to the Council Procedure By-law. Meeting invitations will be issued to those who register. Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.
    [Show full text]
  • In Ntesinan Across the Labrador Plateau Words by Stephen Loring Images by Dave Brown Ntesinan Is the Innu Word for the Land, the Country
    Winter 2017 Vol. 44 No. 4 Quarterly Journal of the Wilderness Canoe Association Paddlers survey the Kogaluk canyon for a decent route. In Ntesinan Across the Labrador Plateau Words by Stephen Loring Images by Dave Brown Ntesinan is the Innu word for the land, the country. The the federal and provincial governments. During the fall Innu (as the Naskapi refer to themselves) have for cen - of 1979, a small party set out from the Quebec North turies lived and hunted in what is now called Labrador. Shore & Labrador Rail Road landing at Astray Lake, Recently they have begun land claim negotiations with bound for the coast of Labrador. The party consisted of The trip was, in part, a means to fa - barren Labrador plateau, hopping It did not seem strange or un - cilitate archaeological and ethnohis - from pond to pond, to reach the val - natural torical research, in that it sought to ley of the Kogaluk River, which was to be setting out as I was on document evidence of previous descended to the sea. Upon reaching such an errand. Indian land use. But there were other the Labrador coast they paddled to Rather there came a sense of reasons for traveling not so clearly Zoar Bay and a mid-October ren - unspeakable relief definable. The party worked through dezvous with Inuit hunters from in thus slipping away into the the series of lakes east of Schefer- Nain. Following is excerpted from wilderness. ville, portaged across the divide into Stephen Loring’s journal. the Ungava watershed, and located Mina Benson Hubbard the headwaters of the De Pas River, 15 August.
    [Show full text]
  • Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service
    Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 13, 2014 To: Algoma Central Railway (ACR) Passenger Service Working Group c/o Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive – Level Three Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 From: BDO Canada LLP 747 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5N7 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................. 2 Revenue and Ridership ................................................................................ 2 Stakeholders ............................................................................................. 3 Socio-Economic Impact ................................................................................ 4 Economic Impact ........................................................................................... 4 Social Impact ............................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description
    Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Rio Tinto Fer et Titane WSP Canada Inc. Adress line 1 Adress line 2 Adress line 3 www.wspgroup.com WSP Canada Inc. 300-3450, boul. Gene-H.-Kruger Trois-Rivières (Qc) G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-1292 www.wspgroup.com Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Final Version Approved by: Numéro de projet : 111-20171-02 J U N E 2 01 4 3450, boulevard Gene-H.-Kruger, bureau 300 ~ Trois-Rivières (Québec) CANADA G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-8550 ~ Téléc. : 819 375-1217 ~ www.wspgroup.com Reference to be cited: WSP. 2014. Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine. Summary of the Project Description. Report produced for Rio Tinto Fer et Titane. 25 p. SUMMARY 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Rio Tinto Fer et Titane inc. (hereinafter “RTFT”) has operated, since 1989, the Havre-Saint-Pierre mine, consisting of a hemo-ilmenite deposit, at its Lake Tio mining property, located 43 km north of Havre-Saint-Pierre (see Figure 1). However, the mine has been in operation since 1950. The most recent data from the mining plan provides for the site to be in operation beyond 2050. According to this plan, the total amount of waste rock which will be generated exceeds the storage capacity available under the current mining leases, which will be reached by the end of 2017. RTFT would therefore like to obtain new land lease agreements for the disposal of waste rock to be generated until the end of the mine’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices June 2010
    Little Qualicum River Estuary Regional Conservation Area 2010-2019 Management Plan Appendices June 2010 Guardian of the Estuary Little Qualicum River Estuary Regional Conservation Area ______________________________________________2010-2019 Management Plan Table of Contents Page Appendix A User Survey Results and Other Feedback ........................ A3 Appendix B Estuary History ..................................................................... A23 Appendix C Estuary Conservation ........................................................... A25 Appendix D Bibliography ........................................................................... A32 Table of Figures and Map Figure C1 Sensitive Ecosystem Inventory (SEI) of the Little Qualicum River Estuary (2004) .................... A25 Figure C2 Terrestrial Ecosystem Map (TEM) of the Little Qualicum River Estuary (2008) ................................ A25 Figure C3 Rare Ecological Plant Communities Posibly at the Little Qualicum Estuary, Showing those Almost Certainly Present at the Estuary ........................... A26 Figure C4 Rare Animals Documented at the Little Qualicum Estuary and Possibly Using the LQRERCA ..................... A28 Figure C5 Rare Plants Documented at the Little Qualicum Estuary and Possibly Found at the LQRERCA ............... A30 Map C1 Little Qualicum River Watershed ........................................ A31 Cover photo: R. Guthrie and M. Henigman A2 Little Qualicum River Estuary Regional Conservation Area ______________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • It Was a Minute to Midnight: Quebec Crosses the Threshold of 17 % of Protected Areas
    PRESS RELEASE For immediate release It Was a Minute to Midnight: Quebec Crosses the Threshold of 17 % of Protected Areas Montreal, December 17, 2020 – The Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Quebec chapter (SNAP Québec) is very pleased that the Quebec government is now protecting 17 % of its territory, a significant step forward in favour of conservation in Québec. Today’s announcements add 66,000 km2 of protected areas, an area equivalent to 12 times Prince Edward Island. “We applaud the government’s will to achieve international protected area targets and play a leading role in terms of conservation. Quebec is only the second province in Canada to reach the 17 % target and occupies the first place in terms of total surface area protected with more than 257,000 km2, a surface area larger than the United Kingdom,” highlights Alain Branchaud, executive director of SNAP Québec. Protecting the Territory to Protect a Way of Life SNAP Québec congratulates the Cree Nation Government for its impressive leadership in conservation and is very pleased with the more than 39,000 km2 of newly announced protected areas in Eeyou Istchee. These are the result of extensive consultations with the communities conducted by the Cree Nation Government, notably with Cree trappers and hunters. The sites thus identified therefore represent territories of high biocultural significance for these communities. It is now 23 % of Eeyou Istchee that is protected from industrial development. “This region having been impacted by hydroelectric, mining and forestry activities, this network of protected areas will allow for the conservation of territories used since a time immemorial by the Cree.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Draft Terms of Reference 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area The Project is located in Northwestern Ontario, with the northern end of the road approximately 525 km northeast of Thunder Bay (refer to Figure 1.1). The Project is located on provincial Crown land, Webequie First Nation Reserve land under federal jurisdiction), and the traditional territories of Indigenous communities (refer also to Section 6.4.6 Land and Resource Use). Figure 6.1 illustrates the location of the alternative routes in relation to project area features and sensitivities. Due to confidentiality constraints (including those imposed by Webequie First Nation and Government of Ontario ministries), and the need to respect the wishes of potentially affected Indigenous communities with respect to divulging certain information on the use of lands in the project area, it is not possible to illustrate the location or bounds of a number of features and sensitivities, including First Nations’ traditional territories, individual camps/cabins, species at risk (e.g., caribou ranges), and government-regulated hunting areas (e.g., trapline licences). However, sensitive features and resources are described in general terms in this section of the ToR. The EA will summarize past investigations and analyses of alternative road alignments between Webequie and the mineral deposit area near McFaulds Lake, and will assess the potential impacts of alternative alignments in the preferred corridor for the Webequie Supply Road. The significance of an environmental impact partially depends on the geographic extent. As such, the impact assessment will be conducted on the basis of specific study areas related to the project development, adopting a multi-scale approach for describing baseline conditions (existing environment) and predicting effects from the Project.
    [Show full text]
  • By TRUMAN MICHELSON
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology BuUetin 123 Anthropological Papers, No. 8 Linguistic Classification of Cree and Montagnais-Naskapi Dialects By TRUMAN MICHELSON 67 LINGUISTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CREE AND MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI DIALECTS By Truman Michelson In 1912 I had an opportunity to study the Cree of Fort Totten (North Dakota), and in 1920 had a chance to study the Cree of Files Hill, Saskatchewan, Canada. In 1923 I observed the Montagnais of Lake St. John and Lake Mistassini at Pointe Bleu, Quebec. In 1924 at the Northwest River I studied the dialect of Davis Inlet from an Indian there, and gained a little knowledge of the dialect of the Northwest River. The American Council of Learned Societies made it possible for me in the summer and early fall of 1935 to do field- work among some of the Algonquian Indians in the vicinity of James and Hudson's Bay. I visited Moose Factory, Rupert's House, Fort George, and the Great Whale River. However, I was able to do a little work on the Albany Cree and Ojibwa owing to their presence at Moose Factory; and I did a few minutes work with an East Main Indian whom I stumbled across at Rupert's House; similarly I worked for a few minutes on the Weenusk dialect as an Indian from there chanced to come to Moosonee at the foot of James Bay. Owing to a grant-in-aid made by the American Coun- cil of Learned Societies it was possible for me to again visit the James and Hudson's Bays region in the spring, summer, and early fall of 1936.
    [Show full text]