Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework: Core Strategy & Development Control Policies DPD (Preferred Options)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ellistown & Battleflat Parish Council Neighbourhood
ELLISTOWN & BATTLEFLAT PARISH COUNCIL NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2015 – 2031 Contents Chapter heading Page Introduction from the Chair 3 1. What is a Neighbourhood Plan and why are they important? 4 2. Why we need a Neighbourhood Plan for Ellistown and Battleflat 5 3. How the Plan was prepared 6 4. Our Parish 9 5. What we want the Neighbourhood Plan to achieve 11 6. Meeting the requirement for sustainable development 11 7. Neighbourhood Plan Policies 14 1. Strategy 14 2. Housing 23 3. Employment 29 4. Shops and Community Facilities 32 5. The Natural Environment 34 6. Heritage Assets 40 7. Getting Around 42 8. Helping to address Climate Change 47 8. Monitoring and Review 48 Page 2 of 48 Introduction from the Chair of Ellistown and Battleflat Parish Council The Parish of Ellistown and Battleflat sits immediately south of the town of Coalville in the District of North West Leicestershire, the County of Leicestershire and within the National Forest. We have a rapidly growing and ageing population, although the age profile of our residents overall remains younger than regional and national norms. Levels of economic activity remain high within the Parish and Ellistown and Battleflat remains a popular place to live, with demand for new homes high. Residents have told us, through consultation, that they value the peacefulness of the Parish and its proximity to the countryside. Residents wish to maintain these qualities, but also recognise that the Parish must continue to grow to reflect the need for development across the District. The Parish through major projects such as the South East Coalville Development Scheme will see a considerable amount of new housing and employment opportunities. -
Ellistown & Battleflat Neighbourhood Plan
ELLISTOWN & BATTLEFLAT PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018 – 2031 Contents Chapter heading Page Introduction from the Chair 3 1. What are Neighbourhood Plans and why are they important? 4 2. Why we need a Neighbourhood Plan for Ellistown and Battleflat 5 3. How the Plan was prepared 6 4. Our Parish 9 5. What we want the Neighbourhood Plan to achieve 11 6. Meeting the requirement for sustainable development 11 7. Neighbourhood Plan Policies 14 1. Strategy 14 2. Housing 21 3. Employment 27 4. Shops and Community Facilities 30 5. The Natural Environment 32 6. Heritage Assets 37 7. Getting Around 39 8. Helping to address Climate Change 44 8. Monitoring and Review 44 Appendices Appendix 1 – Basic Condition Statement Appendix 2 – Consultation Statement Appendix 3 – Census data Appendix 4 – Housing Needs Report Appendix 5 – Environmental Inventory Appendix 6 – Buildings and Structures of local significance 2 Introduction from the Chair of Ellistown and Battleflat Parish Council The Parish of Ellistown and Battleflat sits immediately south of the town of Coalville in the District of North West Leicestershire, the County of Leicestershire and within the National Forest. We have a rapidly growing and ageing population, although the age profile of our residents overall remains younger than regional and national norms. Levels of economic activity remain high within the Parish and Ellistown and Battleflat remains a popular place to live, with demand for new homes high. Residents have told us, through consultation, that they value the peacefulness of the Parish and its proximity to the countryside. Residents wish to maintain these qualities, but also recognise that the Parish must continue to grow to reflect the need for development across the District. -
Archaeology Gazetteer
Leicestershire CC HNET Monument Full Report 22/08/2016 Number of records: 56 Archaeology gazetteer HER NumberSite Name Record Type MLE2721 Roman site north of Park House Farm Monument Roman features and pottery were recorded during drain laying operations and ploughing in 1968. It was thought that there could be a kiln. Pottery identified in 2012, however, did not suggest a kiln but rather a farmstead. Over 500 sherds were brought in at this time, mainly grey wares. Monument Types and Dates POTTERY KILN? (Roman - 43 AD? to 409 AD?) Evidence FIND SITE (Roman - 43 AD to 409 AD) Evidence FIND Evidence SUB SURFACE DEPOSIT Description and Sources Description In September 1968 Peter Higgins, the agricultural contractor, found in drain laying operations Roman pottery, daub etc from a ditch and noted a cobbled area. E Blank recorded the ditch sections and recovered pottery including Samian, colour coat and grey wares. Her conclusion was that it 'is probably a settlement site of some complexity lasting from the 2nd - 4th centuries'. One sherd is said to be a waster. <1> After ploughing on September 28th 1968"large round patches of dark occupation, charcoal, were evident near the hedgerow west of the trenches across the ditches. Bits of pottery, burnt daub, glass and roofing tiles were picked up on the surface. What may have been a cobbled surface was seen c.20' S of Trench I. The 'burnt daub' has 'finger holes' piercing it and it seems possible that they may be from kiln domes - going with the 'waster' and the black patches. -
Division Arrangements for Thurmaston Ridgemere
East Goscote Rearsby Ratcliffe on the Wreake Cossington Rothley & Mountsorrel Rothley Syston Fosse Queniborough Gaddesby Syston Melton Wolds Syston Ridgeway Wanlip Twyford & Thorpe South Croxton Barkby Leicestershire Birstall Birstall Thurmaston Thurmaston Ridgemere Lowesby Beeby Barkby Thorpe Hungarton Launde Cold Newton Keyham Scraptoft Billesdon County Division Parish 0 0.375 0.75 1.5 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 Thurmaston Ridgemere © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD Division Arrangements for 100049926 2016 Lockington-Hemington Castle Donington & Kegworth Castle Donington Kegworth Isley cum Langley Long Whatton & Diseworth Breedon on the Hill Hoton Hathern Loughborough North Cotes Sileby & The Wolds Staunton Harold Prestwold Valley Loughborough East Burton on the Wolds Belton Worthington Walton on the Wolds Osgathorpe Shepshed Loughborough North West Shepshed Loughborough South Barrow upon Soar Loughborough South West Ashby de la Zouch Coleorton Leicestershire Quorn & Barrow Ashby-de-la-Zouch Ashby Woulds Swannington Quorndon Whitwick Whitwick Charley Sileby Mountsorrel Woodhouse Packington Coalville North Forest & Measham Ravenstone with Snibstone Oakthorpe & Donisthorpe Bardon Rothley & Mountsorrel Normanton Le Heath Coalville South Swithland Rothley Ulverscroft Bradgate Hugglescote & Donington le Heath Measham Ellistown & Battleflat Thurcaston & Cropston Ibstock & Appleby Markfield Swepstone Newtown Linford Syston Ridgeway Stretton en le Field Chilcote Heather Stanton-under-Bardon -
North West Leicestershire District Council's Policy on the Use of Electronic Communications
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance with North West Leicestershire District Council's policy on the use of electronic communications. 2 North West Leicestershire District Division Name Number Variance Description Detail – LGBCE comments Comments on operational issues of Cllrs 2020 by North West Leicestershire District Council Ashby de la 1 3% This division comprises the parish of This division was proposed and supported No operational issues Zouch Ashby de la Zouch with the exception of locally. We recommend it as part of our draft the parish ward of Ashby Castle recommendations. The division would give a good level of electoral equality. We received objections to the exclusion of the Ashby Castle parish ward from the division. The consequences of including the Castle parish ward are described in detail below in our comments on the Valley division. We are not persuaded that resulting levels of electoral inequality are justified. Castle Donington 1 -5% This division comprises the parishes of This division was proposed locally. We No operational issues & Kegworth Castle Donington, Kegworth and received expressions of support for this Lockington-Hemington proposal. The division has clear boundaries and gives a good level of electoral equality. Coalville North 1 -2% This division comprises the North West We received two different proposals for We suggest moving The Limes Leicestershire District Council wards of boundaries in the Coalville area. However, ward of Ravenstone with Coalville East, Coalville West, when we visited the area, it appeared that Snibston Parish from the Ibstock Hugglescote St Mary’s and Snibston neither proposal would maintain local ties in and Appleby division to this South, together with the unparished part the centre of Coalville. -
HS2 Ltd ‘2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement’ Consultation Response of Leicestershire County Council December 2018
HS2 Ltd ‘2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement’ Consultation Response of Leicestershire County Council December 2018 Structure of this response This Response to the HS2 Ltd Working Draft Environmental Statement (WDES) by is split into four parts. These are as follows: PART 1: Document Introduction and Main areas of Concern PART 2: Response to WDES Vol 2 – Community Areas LA03, LA04 and LA05 PART 3: Response to WDES Vol 2 – Route-wide Effects PART 4: Response to WDES Vol 3 – Off-route Effects PART 5: Appendices For any enquires about this response, please contact: [email protected] 1 | Page PART 1: Document Introduction and Maim areas of Concern i) This document and its appendices comprise Leicestershire County Council’s (the Council’s) response to the Working Draft Environmental Statement (WDES) for HS2 Phase 2b (the proposed scheme). We issue this response in the spirit of contributing to the processes surrounding this vast infrastructure project, but must include the caveat that the Council can only respond to the material to hand and further intensive work with HS2 Ltd is required to fully understand the impacts for Leicestershire and the most appropriate mitigation. ii) The Council recognises that the WDES is a draft document. However, it is disappointing that even in draft; there is a distinct lack of information provided in sections of the WDES, especially regarding the proposed scheme’s constructional and operational impacts and in respect of its design. But, the Council have determined to use this as an opportunity to shape the design and mitigation across the County. Where clear mitigation is not yet defined, the Council will seek to secure assurances from HS2 Ltd that further work will be carried out to inform the preparation of the Hybrid Bill, including HS2 Ltd preparing an Interim Transport Assessment (including sensitivity testing), and during the Parliamentary processes. -
Sustainability Appraisal (SA) / Strategic
Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework: Site Allocations DPD (Preferred Options) Sustainability Appraisal (SA) / Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Sustainability Appraisal Report (Appendices) June 2006 Prepared for Leicestershire County Council by: Atkins Ltd Axis 6 th Floor West 10 Holliday St Birmingham B1 1TF Tel: Nicki Schiessel 0121 483 5986 Email: [email protected] This document is copyright and should not be copied in whole or in part by any means other than with the approval of Atkins Consultants Limited. Any unauthorised user of the document shall be responsible for all liabilities arising out of such use. Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Contents Section Page Appendix A: List of Consultees and Interested Stakeholders 1 Appendix B: Summary of the Consultation Responses on the Scoping Report 15 Appendix C: Baseline Tables 23 Appendix D: Assessment of Proposed Sites 38 Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices APPENDIX A: LIST OF CONSULTEES AND INTERESTED STAKEHOLDERS 1 Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices SPECIFIC CONSULTATION BODIES GENERAL: East Midlands Regional Assembly Highways Agency, Melton Mowbray Programme Planning & Development, Birmingham Countryside Agency, East Midlands Region, East Midlands Development Agency Nottingham Nottingham Environment Agency, Leicestershire Partnership -
28 August 2001 Recreation Assessment and Disposal
REPORT TO CABINET – 28 AUGUST 2001 RECREATION ASSESSMENT AND DISPOSAL – LAND AT TILTON ON THE HILL JOINT REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY AND THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION PART A Purpose of Report 1. This report seeks to declare the playing fields at the former Primary School, off Marefield Lane, Tilton on the Hill surplus to requirements and to describe the procedures the County Council will have to follow if it wishes to dispose of the land. The report also considers whether any community recreation demand could most effectively be met by the use of the land. Recommendations 2. It is recommended that Members; (i) approve the findings of the recreation assessment as attached at Appendix B; (ii) agree that the land at Marefield Lane, Tilton on the Hill is declared surplus to requirements; (iii) consider whether they wish to; (a) authorise officers to undertake any necessary consultations under DfES Guidelines and to undertake to seek to identify and to purchase a suitable alternative site for recreation elsewhere in the village, (b) pursue the possibility of obtaining residential development upon the site. (iv) if options (iii) (a) or (b) are not achievable, to offer to sell the land to the Parish and/or District Councils for recreational purposes and to authorise officers to seek the necessary consent from the Secretary of State under the Learning and Skills Act 2000 to the disposal of the land. Reason for Recommendations 3. The County Council is under an obligation to undertake consultations with various local organisations and groups in order to satisfy the requirements of the Secretary of State in the guidance issued by her (Section 77 of the School Standards and Frameworks Act 1998). -
Nos of Properties Affected AMENDED DW
9 Agenda Item7 a7 DEVELOPMENT OF A RAIL STRATEGY (INCLUDING HS2) FOR LEICESTER AND LEICESTERSHIRE Amendment to Table 1 – Comparison of affected properties - contained in the Cabinet Report (page 211) Ordnance Survey’s AddressBase Premium dataset was used to identify the number of “Properties” within specific distances of the proposed HS2 line. Following a review of the exercise, flaws in the translated version of AddressBase Premium were identified, namely that certain addresses were duplicated multiple times, inflating the totals. The exercise was re-run in February 2017 with duplicate addresses removed. Furthermore the DfT High Speed Two “Properties Above Tunnels Factsheet” suggests that properties above tunnels may be eligible for “Tunnel Guarantees” and therefore the data below only includes those buildings within 50m of the Airport Tunnel. The data is also presented on a parish by parish basis for additional clarity: "Properties" within "Properties" within "Properties" within 50m (inc. tunnel) 120m (exc. tunnel) 300m (exc. tunnel) Parish Old New Diff Old New Diff Old New Diff Appleby Magna 3 15 12 7 21 14 13 33 20 Ashby de la Zouch 3 2 -1 19 6 -13 206 247 41 Breedon on the Hill 1 1 0 3 4 1 16 9 -7 Castle Donington 18 0 -18 1 0 -1 37 0 -37 Coleorton 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 -1 Isley cum Langley 1 0 -1 1 0 -1 2 0 -2 Kegworth 3 2 -1 3 10 7 4 130 126 Lockington-Hemington 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 -1 Long Whatton and Diseworth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Measham 15 3 -12 84 13 -71 408 270 -138 Oakthorpe and Donisthorpe 0 0 0 1 0 -1 8 0 -8 Packington 0 0 0 1 2 1 18 49 31 Stretton en le Field 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 Twycross 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Worthington 1 0 -1 3 6 3 16 14 -2 Total 27 23 -22 123 62 -61 733 760 27 Limitations: A “Property” in this context would include everything within the dataset, including where the same property may include multiple addresses (e.g. -
N Ellistown and Battleflat Parish Council
N ELLISTOWN AND BATTLEFLAT PARISH COUNCIL Parish Clerk: Mr Paul Goodman, Council Offices, Coalville, Leicestershire LE67 3FJ. (tel: 07881 203273 )(email: [email protected]) Website: http://ellistownandbattleflat.leicestershireparishcouncils.org AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON 17th JUNE 2015 AT 7.00pm Ellistown Primary School 1. To RECEIVE and APPROVE apologies for absence 2. To RECEIVE any declarations of Discloseable Pecuniary Interest 3. To FILL the Parish Council vacancy through co-option 4. To AGREE a final response to planning consultations: Outline Planning Permission - Demolition of existing Scout Hut and erection of a new building to be used as a community facility at Scout Hut Ibstock Road Ellistown Planning application 15/00514/FUL: 19 Rushby Road Ellistown 5. Public participation and police report The meeting is adjourned for up to 15 minutes to allow members of the public to ask questions and raise items of concerns 6. To RECEIVE a presentation from Clare Proudfoot (NWLDC Street Action Manager) 7. To CONFIRM the minutes of the annual meeting of 20th May 2015 8. To RECEIVE an update of Actions from the clerk 9. To RECEIVE a report from the Young People's Council 10.. To RECEIVE the Clerk's report 11. To RECEIVE an update on Financial matters: 11i To APPROVE the payments for Vouchers (1-21) and sign outstanding cheques (vouchers 22-26) 11.ii To CONFIRM the bank reconciliation at 31st May 2015. 11.iii To RECEIVE a budget report profiling current income and expenditure as at 31st May 2015 12. To UPDATE Financial Regulations 13. To DISCUSS the report on the Childrens Play Areas and AGREE any measures to be taken as a result 14. -
24 April 2014 Stakeholder British Gas
Appendix C North Kilworth Stakeholder letters – 24 April 2014 Stakeholder British Gas Properties, Aviary Court, Wade Road, Basingstoke Hampshire, RG24 8GZ British Telecommunications Plc, Customer Wideband Planning Group Post Point BSTE 0301, Bath Street, Nottingham NG1 1BZ East Leicestershire and Rutland CCG, Suite 2 and 3, Bridge Business Park 674 Melton Road, Thurmaston, Leicester, LE4 8BL Ann Plackett, English Heritage, East Midlands Region, 44 Derngate Northampton, NN1 1UH Homes and Communities Agency, 5 St Philip’s Place, Colmore Row Birmingham , B3 2PW Ms Aoife O'Tool, Highways Agency, Level 9, The Cube 199 Wharfside Street, Birmingham B1 1RN FAO Mr D Holdstock, National Grid, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited, Gables House, Kenilworth Road, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 6JX Miss C Jackson, Consultation Service, Natural England, Hornbeam House, Electra Way, Crewe, Cheshire, CW1 6GJ Network Rail Infrastructure Limited, Kings Place, 90 York Way London, N1 9AG Mr Peter Davies, Severn Trent Water Ltd, Hucknall Road Nottingham, NG5 1FH Mr M Galey, Anglian Water Ltd, Planning & Equivalence Team, Thorpe Wood House, Thorpe Wood, Peterborough, PE3 6WT Mr James Lidgett, Environment Agency, Lower Trent Area, Trentside Offices, Scarrington Road, West Bridgeford, Nottingham, NG2 5FA Deborah Bennett, Executive Director, Seven Locks Housing, 1a Anson House, 8 Compass Point, Northampton Road, Market Harborough, Leicestershire, LE16 9HW Edward Garnier, MP [email protected] CPRE [email protected] Voluntary Action Leicestershire [email protected] Leicestershire Ethnic Minority Partnership [email protected] Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups [email protected] Interfaith Forum for Leicestershire [email protected] Market Harborough Chamber of Commerce. (Contact via website) Leicestershire Centre for Integrated Living. -
Leicestershire County Council
2015 Leicestershire County Council Consultation Statement Consultation Statement 1.0 Consultation Statement 1.1 As the first stage in the production of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan, the County Council published the following documents in November 2013: Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Issues Document; Leicestershire Minerals and Waste Local Plan Review - Sustainability Appraisal incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment: Scoping Report. 1.2. The bodies with contact details listed in Appendix 1 were consulted by email or letter with a request for any comments to be provided by 24th January 2014. The documents, together with a summary leaflet and a response form, were made available on the County’s website (www.leics.gov.uk). The consultation exercise was also publicised by means of an advertisement placed in local newspapers. 1.3. A total of 70 groups and individuals responded to the Minerals and Waste Issues Consultation document. 28 of the responses were from councils (3 from District Councils; 12 from Parish Councils; 6 from adjoining Councils; and 7 from other councils), 12 from industry (7 from mineral companies and 5 from waste companies), 9 from statutory consultees, 2 from County Council Departments, 14 from other organisations, 2 from landowners and 3 from private individuals. A list of those who responded is set out in Table 1 below. 1 Consultation Statement Table 1: Respondents to the Issues consultation document Parish/Town Other Councils/ Industry Public Bodies Other Councils Meetings Blaby P.C. Charnwood Acorn Coal Authority British B.C. Recyclers Mountaineering Council Broughton Astley Hinckley & Air Products English Bowline P.C.