DOCSLIB.ORG

Final FINAL Policing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final FINAL Policing Labour’s Zero-Based Review Interim Report Number 1: Policing Labour’s Zero-Based Review: Interim Report No.1 Policing Part One – Exploring efficiencies; prioritising the frontline FOREWORD David Cameron and George Osborne are set to break their promise to balance the books by next year and so it will fall to the next Labour Government to finish the job where the Conservatives have failed. In tough times Labour knows we will have to make tough decisions. We have pledged, and will legislate for, tough fiscal rules to deliver a surplus on the current budget and get the national debt falling as soon as possible in the next Parliament. Our Zero-Based Review project is delving deep into every pound the Government spends in order to throw light on the current Government’s waste and false economies. But the Zero- Based Review will also help the next Labour Government to ruthlessly prioritise public spending and deliver service reform and improvements, rather than just salami-slicing budgets and watching services deteriorate, as has been the practise under the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats. This series of publications will set out some of the ways in which a tighter approach to financial management under Labour could free up resources, whilst also maximising the value for money of our public services. In the first of our interim reports from Labour’s Zero-Based Review, we highlight the first phase in Labour’s policing work, and set out how we will make nearly £250 million of savings in the Home Office budget in order to better protect frontline policing. We outline examples of nearly a quarter of a billion pounds where Ministers could make savings immediately or implement efficiencies to hold off their planned future cuts to the frontline, if they chose to do so. Specifically, we detail recommendations on how Home Office and policing structures should be less wasteful, how savings could be made through smarter purchasing and management of the procurement chain, and where the costs of regulation should be recovered in a way which does not disadvantage the taxpayer. Police forces are planning cuts for the next financial year 2015/16 of over 1,000 officers – because Government plans are not helping police forces protect the frontline. Our first priority has been to look at changes and reforms to meet the budget already set for 2015/16, finding savings to protect the frontline, while longer-term work is underway to 1 find future savings. Labour’s Zero-Based Review has identified initial cuts, savings and revenue-raising measures to protect the frontline and help meet the financial constraints on policing budgets. Police forces are attempting to save money through selling estate, and a degree of collaboration, in 2015/16, with little or no support from the Government. However, forces have told us they are also having to cut a further 1,100 frontline police officers in 2015/16 to meet the savings required. Sir Hugh Orde has warned that future cuts could mean “a greater number of officer posts would be involved, and this could potentially have serious implications for statutory responsibilities and the safeguarding of the most vulnerable”. Through scrapping the Police and Crime Commissioner elections, saving £50 million, implementing full-cost recovery for gun licensing to raise £17.2 million and levying increased fees for police DORs (Driver Offender Retraining), raising £9 million – Labour will stop the cut of 1,100 officers we know are already planned under the Theresa May for 2015/16, having found the savings required through making different decisions with different priorities. Furthermore, Labour will support the police in finding additional savings to meet the pressures on police force budgets into the future, to better protect officers on the frontline – including through mandatory national procurement, enhanced collaboration and bearing down on overtime in forces performing below the level of the majority. This document is intended to present an indication of our direction of travel – and only the first party of Labour’s work to reform policing. It is illustrative of the next Labour Government’s plans to bring the deficit down in a fairer way, whilst protecting public services, and delivering big reform, without big spending. Chris Leslie MP, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury Yvette Cooper MP, Shadow Home Secretary 2 LABOUR’S ZERO-BASED REVIEW The Zero-Based Review is a root and branch review of every pound the Government spends and will help the next Labour Government to ruthlessly prioritise public spending and deliver service reform and improvements, rather than just salami-slicing budgets and watching services deteriorate, as has been the practise under the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats. This process is intended not only to reveal the current Government’s costly errors and skewed priorities but will require the Labour Party to grasp opportunities to deliver reformed public services which are valued and justifiable; which provide value for money and quality services that meet the needs and demands of the public who use them; and which can both make savings, and secure economic growth. Fundamentally reviewing current Government spending is a necessary step in preparing for office. Last year Ed Balls MP, the Shadow Chancellor, announced that Labour would conduct a detailed review of every pound the Government spends, in order to help prepare ourselves for the challenges the next administration will face. We set out the principles of our Zero-Based Review in a Phase 1 discussion document in December. Since the start of 2014 Chris Leslie MP, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, has completed the first round of the Zero-Based Review, analysing every departmental budget and exploring public service reform and redesign in detail with each Shadow team. This process has been guided by the following five principles: • We will use public money more efficiently – and seek efficiencies in every area of government spending • We will use all departmental budgets to strengthen the economy – supporting growth, job creation, innovation and exports • We will ensure greater fairness in the impact of spending – and will prioritise spending that prevents future problems • At the same time as increasing efficiency, the quality and experience of public service must improve – offering the speech, simplicity and responsiveness that people now expect • We will strengthen accountability and transparency across government – with clear efficiency incentives for all departments No department has been exempt from this process, including any areas that we may choose to protect or ring-fence, because efficiency will be necessary across all areas of spending. Our work for Phase 1 of our Zero-Based Review has been informed by the wide range of work and reports which have contributed to the Labour Party’s Policy Review: the Armitt 3 Review of long-term infrastructure planning; the Local Government Innovation Taskforce; the Stevens Review of policing and crime; and the Adonis Growth Review, to mention just a few. Labour’s Treasury team will continue to collaborate with Shadow Ministers to expose waste, mismanagement and poor decision making by David Cameron’s Government, as well as increase the scrutiny of each departmental balance sheet over the months to come. We will complete our Zero-Based Review with our first Spending Review in Government, but this early work is crucial to inform the policy choices we will make. As Ed Miliband and Ed Balls have outline the next Labour government will be about big reforms and not big spending. 4 FAILURES OF THE TORY-LED APPROACH TO POLICING The current Government will fail to eradicate the deficit as they promised, leaving behind a £75 billion shortfall which will place an incredible burden on public services for the years ahead. But as the next Labour Government, we are determined that savings can be found in a fairer way, viewed through the values that we hold and our determination to protect the frontline. The Tory-led approach has been wasteful and inefficient, indecisive and characterised by too many costly u-turns, and has undermined economic growth. • Cutting the frontline rather than eliminating waste: Theresa May frontloaded cuts to the frontline in the first two years of the Parliament, making no effort to improve collaboration and regional delivery of specialist functions. Instead forces rushed to cut frontline numbers rather than reforming the services they provide. • Fragmentation of services: The arrival of Police and Crime Commissioners has added to the fragmented approach to police reform – with some forces becoming less collaborative, and PCCs pulling out of arrangements with other forces that could save millions of pounds. In the criminal justice system, and across our public services Ministers are driving fragmentation, reorganisation and competition just at a time when local services need to collaborate more to deliver better services and save money too. • The wrong priorities: The Tories chose to spend £75 million on elections for Police and Crime Commissioners, in November, resulting in record-low turnouts. According to the Home Affairs Select Committee PCCs have also cost more than their predecessors, with expensive deputies appointed in some areas. Meanwhile 16,000 police officers have been cut, with neighbourhood policing all but disappearing in some areas. There have been increases in violent crime, but fewer criminals have been brought to justice. Meanwhile standards in policing have caused understandable public concern, but the Independent Police Complaints Commission remains unreformed and inadequate. • Short-termism: Theresa May’s short-termist approach to bringing down the Home Office’s police and crime budget is putting at risk the Government’s duty to ensure our police service is fit for the 21st Century. Neighbourhood policing faces an existential crisis if Ministers continue with their current approach.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Editorial: Left-Horizons Is Launched More Appetite for Marxist Ideas
    Editorial: Left-Horizons is launched More appetite for Marxist ideas than ever before October 16 2017 The Left Horizons website is launched today with the aim of developing and promoting the Marxist strand of opinion within the Labour and trade union movement. Last week, Chris Leslie, Labour MP for Nottingham East, declared in relation to Momentum, that “there is no place for Marxism” inside the Labour Party. Leaving the aside the rather dubious link between Momentum and Marxism, even a cursory study of Labour history will show that there has always been a Marxist strand of opinion within the Party. We welcome the fact that for the first time in generations front bench Labour MPs are happy to describe themselves as “Marxists” or at the very least to pay tribute to Marx’s ideas. In contradiction to Chris Leslie, in our opinion, there should be “no place” in the Labour Party for candidates imposed undemocratically on a Constituency Labour Party, as happened to Nottingham East when Leslie was made the candidate. Neither should there be a place for any Labour MPs to be equivocal on the question of austerity and the living standards of working-class people. When Ed Miliband and Ed Balls lost the 2015 general election for Labour, Chris Leslie was one of those right- wing Labour MPs who implied that the Labour manifesto had at that time been too radical. “We should have done more about welfare reform and public-sector reform”, he said, “not just giving the impression it was all about spending more or less money.” When the Tories were hell-bent on pauperising the disabled by cutting their welfare benefits in July 2015, Chris Leslie was one of those 184 Labour MPs who did not vote against the second reading of the Tories’ Welfare Reform and Work Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee FINANCE (NO. 2) BILL Fifth Sitting Thursday 28 October 2010 CONTENTS CLAUSE 27 agreed to. SCHEDULE 11 agreed to. CLAUSE 28 agreed to. SCHEDULE 12 agreed to. CLAUSE 29 agreed to. SCHEDULE 13 agreed to. CLAUSES 30 and 31 agreed to. SCHEDULE 14 agreed to. CLAUSES 32 and 33 agreed to. Bill, as amended, to be reported. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £4·00 PBC (Bill 072) 2010 - 2011 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 1 November 2010 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 131 Public Bill Committee28 OCTOBER 2010 Finance (No. 2) Bill 132 The Committee
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Centre Ground
    Centre Ground Six Values of mainstream Britain Chris Leslie MP SOCIAL MARKET FOUNDATION FIRST PUBLISHED BY The Social Market Foundation, June 2018 11 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QB Copyright © The Social Market Foundation, 2018 ISBN: 978-1-910683-43-9 The moral right of the author(s) has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. ABOUT THE SOCIAL MARKET FOUNDATION The Social Market Foundation is a think-tank dedicated to developing and promoting the ideas of the radical centre ground of British politics. We believe that fair markets and open public services deliver prosperity and happiness. We have no part-political affiliation and our Board of Trustees includes parliamentarians from all the main political parties. We work with people from all parties and none to promote evidence-based solutions to public policy problems. We are a registered charity with a mission to increase public understanding of social and economic policy. We fulfil that mission by publishing research reports and other papers, by SMF staff and by outside authors whose contributions can help advance debate about the values and policies of the centre. We are pleased to publish Chris Leslie’s paper in that context. Any views expressed in this paper are those of the author, not the SMF.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 – 90 Years of Economic Action for a Fair Society
    Report of the Co-operative Party 2011/12 to Co-operative Group half yearly members meetings The Co-operative Party continues to be a major political force on behalf of the co-operative movement. This year we have been at the forefront of bringing the UN International Year of Co-operatives to Parliament, as well as to the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and town halls around the country. We intend to build on this profile in coming years. Building on our successes in recent years, we have achieved a great deal - legislation to improve and safeguard the position of co-operative organisations, establishing the Co-operative Councils Network to take forward the movement’s agenda at a local level, bold policy solutions that put co- operatives at the heart of society, working with our Labour and Co-operative MPs to be an effective voice for co-operation and mutuality in Parliament, and advancing the work of the Co- operative Group on issues such as the position of young people in our society and expanding the role of co-operatives in international development. Over the coming months we will be working hard on those initiatives and developing new ones, working closely with our colleagues in the co-operative movement as an effective advocate for our values in the face of enormous economic change. New General Secretary Michael Stephenson, General Secretary since 2008, moved on during 2012 to a new role in the Co-operative Banking Group. Since September 2012, the new Co-operative Party General Secretary has been Karin Christiansen. Karin has a wealth of experience in international development and is the Party’s first ever female General Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Trade) Bill
    1 House of Commons NOTICES OF AMENDMENTS given up to and including Friday 2 February 2018 New Amendments handed in are marked thus Amendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance CONSIDERATION OF BILL (REPORT STAGE) TAXATION (CROSS-BORDER TRADE) BILL NOTE This document includes all amendments tabled to date and includes any withdrawn amendments at the end. The amendments have been arranged in the order in which they relate to the Bill. Anna Soubry Mr Kenneth Clarke Mr Chris Leslie Chuka Umunna Stephen Doughty Wes Streeting Kate Green Rushanara Ali Mr Ben Bradshaw Dr Paul Williams Mr David Lammy NC1 To move the following Clause— “EU Customs Union and pre-commencement requirements (1) It shall be a negotiating objective of Her Majesty’s Government in negotiations on the matters specified in subsection (2) to maintain the United Kingdom’s participation in the EU Customs Union. (2) Those matters are— (a) the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, and 2 Consideration of Bill (Report Stage): 2 February 2018 Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill, continued (b) a permanent agreement with the European Union for a period subsequent to the transitional period after the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union. (3) It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to lay a report before the House of Commons in accordance with either subsection (4) or subsection (5). (4) A report under this subsection shall be to the effect that the negotiating objective specified in subsection (1) has been achieved. (5) A report under this subsection shall be to the effect that the negotiating objective specified in subsection (1) has not been achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Democratic Left in Europe
    The crisis of the democratic left in Europe Denis MacShane Published by Progress 83Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressonline.org.uk Progress is an organisation of Labour party members which aims to promote a radical and progressive politics for the 21st century. We seek to discuss, develop and advance the means to create a more free, equal and democratic Britain, which plays an active role in Europe and the wider the world. Diverse and inclusive, we work to improve the level and quality of debate both within the Labour party, and between the party and the wider progressive communnity. Honorary President : Rt Hon Alan Milburn MP Chair : StephenTwigg Vice chairs : Rt Hon Andy Burnham MP, Chris Leslie, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Baroness Delyth Morgan, Meg Munn MP Patrons : Rt Hon Douglas Alexander MP, Wendy Alexander MSP, Ian Austin MP, Rt Hon Hazel Blears MP, Rt HonYvette Cooper MP, Rt Hon John Denham MP, Parmjit Dhanda MP, Natascha Engel MP, Lorna Fitzsimons, Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, John Healey MP, Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Rt Hon Beverley Hughes MP, Rt Hon John Hutton MP, Baroness Jones, Glenys Kinnock MEP, Sadiq Kahn MP, Oona King, David Lammy MP, Cllr Richard Leese,Rt Hon Peter Mandelson, Pat McFadden MP, Rt Hon David Miliband MP,Trevor Phillips, Baroness Prosser, Rt Hon James Purnell MP, Jane Roberts, LordTriesman. Kitty Ussher MP, Martin Winter Honorary Treasurer : Baroness Margaret Jay Director : Robert Philpot Deputy Director : Jessica Asato Website and Communications Manager :Tom Brooks Pollock Events and Membership Officer : Mark Harrison Publications and Events Assistant : EdThornton Published by Progress 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressives.org.uk 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Consideration of Lords Amendments
    1 House of Commons Thursday 18 July 2019 CONSIDERATION OF LORDS AMENDMENTS NORTHERN IRELAND (EXECUTIVE FORMATION ETC) BILL On Consideration of Lords Amendments to the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation) Bill (changed to Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Bill) MANUSCRIPT MOTIONS AND AMENDMENTS Lords Amendment No. 1 As an Amendment to the Lords Amendment:— Hilary Benn Alistair Burt Chris Bryant Mr Edward Vaizey Stella Creasy Justine Greening Mr Dominic Grieve Stephen Doughty Sir Oliver Letwin Dr Philippa Whitford Dr Phillip Lee Joanna Cherry Mr Sam Gyimah Peter Kyle Guto Bebb Jonathan Edwards Mr Chris Leslie Heidi Allen Jo Swinson Anna Soubry Martyn Day Caroline Lucas Mr Ben Bradshaw Alison McGovern (a) Page 1,line16, at end insert— “(2C) If, as a result of Parliament standing prorogued or adjourned, a Minister of the Crown cannot comply with the obligations in subsection (2A) or (2B), a proclamation under the Meeting of Parliament Act 1797 (c. 127) shall require Parliament to meet on a specified day within the period within which compliance with subsection (2B) is required and to meet on the five following days (other than Saturdays, Sundays or a day which is a bank holiday in the United Kingdom or in any part of the United Kingdom) to allow for compliance with subsection (2B).” 2 Consideration of Lords Amendments: 18 July 2019 Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Bill, continued Secretary Karen Bradley To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment. ORDER OF THE HOUSE [8 JULY 2019] EXTRACT That the following provisions shall apply to the proceedings on the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation) Bill: Consideration of Lords Amendments (10) (a) Any Lords Amendments to the Bill may be considered forthwith without any Question being put; and any proceedings interrupted for that purpose shall be suspended accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn Party Conference Fringe Events 2008
    A Green and Safe as Houses? Prosperous Land? Can local government solve the Can we combine environmentalism with housing crisis? economic development? @Liberal Democrat Party Conference @Liberal Democrat Party Conference Autumn Party Tuesday 16 September 2008 Monday 15 September 2008 6.15-7.30pm, Connaught 3, Connaught Hotel 1.00-2.00pm, Disraeli Suite, Royal Bath Hotel Conference fringe Matthew Taylor, MP for Truro and St Austell Lembit Öpik MP Cllr James Kempton, Leader, LB of Islington events 2008 Cllr John Shipley, Leader, Newcastle City Council Jonathon Porritt, Chair, UK Sustainable Development Commission Adam Sampson, Chief Executive, Shelter Chair: Chris Leslie, Director, NLGN Chair: Anna Turley, Deputy Director, NLGN Transforming @Labour Party Conference Revitalising @Conservative Party Conference Tuesday 23 September 2008 Tuesday 30 September 2008 12.45-1.45pm, Charter 4, Manchester Central Empowering 12.45-1.45pm, Executive Room 2, ICC John Hutton MP (invited) Bob Neill MP Phil Woolas MP (invited) In Conversation with Sir Simon Milton, Deputy Mayor of London Cllr Helen Holland, Leader, Bristol City Council Cllr Roderick Bluh, Leader, Swindon Borough Council Stephen Hale, Director, Green Alliance Hilary Benn MP Chair: Anna Turley, Deputy Director, NLGN Chair: Chris Leslie, Director, NLGN with Simon Fanshawe refreshments available As Secretary of State for the Environment @Conservative Party Conference Hilary Benn MP has one of the most crucial Monday 29 September 2008 jobs in Government. Join us for a wide-ranging 7.45-8.45pm, Executive Room 7, ICC interview, where Hilary will be talking about the challenge of tackling climate change, how Nick Hurd MP (invited) labour can win the next election and how his Lord Hanningfield, Leader, Essex County Council politics was formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Interview: James Schneider
    James Schneider Co-founder of Momentum Spokesperson & Head of Strategic Communications, Office of the Leader of the Opposition. October 2016 – January 2020 11 January 2021 The referendum UK in a Changing Europe (UKICE): How engaged was Momentum with the referendum campaign in 2016? James Schneider (JS): Initially, we didn’t have a position on the referendum and weren’t doing anything, but myself and some others thought that was a completely unsustainable position. We suspected that the overwhelming bulk of our members and supporters would want us to campaign for Remain. So, we conducted an internal poll and found that this was the case, with around 80% wanting us to campaign for Remain, and used that as our reasoning with the Steering Committee to shift into campaigning for Remain. Then, very quickly, we began working with Another Europe is Possible, who moved into Momentum’s offices. We worked together closely on canvassing, we did some stunts, and had some involvement with the disastrous ‘Battle of the Thames’. I wasn’t on a boat. I was on a bridge, but others were on boats. It was quite a bad moment. When there’s Bob Geldof giving two fingers to fishermen, it’’s like that Mitchell and Webb sketch where they ask: ‘Are we the baddies?’ Is Bob Geldof and a bunch of poshos on his big boat, telling fishermen to get fucked, really good? No, probably not. It was quite a bad day and felt like we were losing. Then the next day Jo Cox was killed. Page 1/33 UKICE: Did you have any other reservations about the way Labour approached the whole referendum campaign? JS: I thought the main Labour campaign – the Alan Johnson, Hilary Benn one – was very limp, and quite establishment, and, therefore not terribly effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition Leaders Need to Share Power with Credible 'Alternative
    Opposition Leaders need to share power with credible ‘alternative Chancellors’ if they want to win elections democraticaudit.com /2015/08/20/opposition-leaders-need-to-share-power-with-credible-alternative- chancellors-if-they-want-to-win-elections/ By Democratic Audit UK 2015-8-20 The Shadow Chancellor occupies a central coordinating role in Britain’s combative Westminster system, says Stephen Barber, who argues that Opposition Leaders need to share their power with credible and competent ‘alternative Chancellors’ if they want to win general elections in the UK, as recent events in UK politics show. I would not for one moment suggest this is the principal reason for Labour’s election defeat in May, but Ed Balls’ recent revelations about his time as Shadow Chancellor serve to underline the conclusions of my recent research into the role. Here I show how a close functional relationship with the Leader of the Opposition is an essential component of electoral success for any party aspiring to win office. But more than that, Shadow Chancellor is a key strategic position in Westminster opposition, exercising control over the Shadow Cabinet. Interviewed by Mary Ridell in The Telegraph. Balls said of his relationship with Miliband that ‘Ed had a core campaign team close to him, and I wasn’t part of that. But I felt he supported me. People didn’t want Ed as Prime Minister, and they didn’t want a Labour government. That includes me. I’m not going to start making excuses or shifting responsibility.’ He confided that he disagreed with the ‘core’ Miliband team over the party’s position on a third runway and its policy to freeze energy prices.
    [Show full text]