What Is the Recommended Humidity Level for Occupied Spaces? (12)

Copy Link

ASHRAE Technical FAQ ID 12 Question What is the recommended humidity level for occupied spaces? ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2016, "Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality", plus ASHRAE BOD approved addenda.requires that relative humidity levels be designed to be limited to 65% or less for mechanical systems with dehumidification capability. For other mechanical system types or where spaces are not served by mechanical systems, Standard 62.1 has no humidity limitations. ASHRAE Standard 55-2017, “Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy”, plus ASHRAE BOD approved addenda.relates reported human comfort to temperature and humidity levels, and establishes a range of temperatures and humidity levels that are considered comfortable by 80% or more of the test subjects. The Standard requires that systems designed to control humidity must be able to maintain a dew- point temperature of 16.8°C (62.2°F). There are no established lower humidity limits for thermal comfort; consequently, Standard 55 does not Answer specify a minimum humidity level. However, non-thermal comfort factors, such as skin drying, irritation of mucus membranes, dryness of the eyes, and static electricity generation, may place limits on the acceptability of very low humidity environments. The 2015 ASHRAE Handbook – HVAC Applications recommends specific design relative humidities for specific applications. The handbook and standards may be purchased and/or individual chapters of the handbook may be purchased and downloaded on-line at our website, www.ashrae.org/ or by calling 1-800-527-4723 in the USA and Canada or 1-404-636-8400 worldwide. ACGIH- American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, (www.acgih.org) AIHA - American Industrial Hygiene Association, (www.aiha.org) ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2016, plus ASHRAE BOD approved addenda. ASHRAE Pubs ASHRAE Standard 55-2017 plus ASHRAE BOD approved addenda. 2015 ASHRAE Handbook – HVAC Applications humidity, comfort, microbe, mold, mildew, moisture, dry, humid, mucous Topic References membrane Cognizant ASHRAE Committees Refer to Organization 1 TC 4.3 ACGIH 2 TC 2.1 AIHA 3 SSPC 62.1 4 5 .

Recommended publications

Preparing HVAC Systems Before Reoccupying a Building by JOHN MCCARTHY, SC.D., C.I.H., MEMBER ASHRAE; KEVIN COGHLAN, C.I.H

TECHNICAL FEATURE This article was published in ASHRAE Journal, January 2021. Copyright 2020 ASHRAE. Posted at www.ashrae.org. This article may not be copied and/or distributed electronically or in paper form without permission of ASHRAE. For more information about ASHRAE Journal, visit www.ashrae.org. Preparing HVAC Systems Before Reoccupying A Building BY JOHN MCCARTHY, SC.D., C.I.H., MEMBER ASHRAE; KEVIN COGHLAN, C.I.H. As states across the U.S. roll out new phases of reopening and ease social distanc- ing restrictions instituted to “flatten the curve” of infection from SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19), commercial building owners and facility manag- ers are seeking direction in preparing their spaces to a return to near-normal levels of occupancy. World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations have focused on “de-densifying” spaces and disinfection of surfaces, while the ASHRAE Epidemic Task Force’s comprehen- sive Building Readiness guidance addresses strategies for preparing HVAC systems for buildings reopening after COVID-19 closures.1 Still, facility engineers have been wondering whether disinfecting their facility’s HVAC system is a further protective step to take to prepare for reopening—and about what else they should do. While no blanket answer exists to fit every scenario reduced loads or turned off as an energy-saving and every building type, the current science2 indicates measure. that, in general, disinfection of mechanical systems is not likely to be necessary. However, that doesn’t mean How SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Impacts Disinfection there isn’t work to be done—or risks to address before Recommendations reopening or expanding the number of occupants To understand why HVAC system disinfection may not in the space.
Reference Guide

Indoor Air Quality Tools for Schools REFERENCE GUIDE Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Indoor Environments Division, 6609J 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 (202) 564-9370 www.epa.gov/iaq American Federation of Teachers 555 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 879-4400 www.aft.org Association of School Business Officials 11401 North Shore Drive Reston, VA 22090 (703) 478-0405 www.asbointl.org National Education Association 1201 16th Steet, NW Washington, DC 20036-3290 (202) 833-4000 www.nea.org National Parent Teachers Association 330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60611-3690 (312) 670-6782 www.pta.org American Lung Association 1740 Broadway New York, NY 10019 (212) 315-8700 www.lungusa.org EPA 402/K-07/008 I January 2009 I www.epa.gov/iaq/schools Introduction � U nderstanding the importance of good basic measurement equipment, hiring indoor air quality (IAQ) in schools is the professional assistance, and codes and backbone of developing an effective IAQ regulations. There are numerous resources program. Poor IAQ can lead to a large available to schools through EPA and other variety of health problems and potentially organizations, many of which are listed in affect comfort, concentration, and staff/ Appendix L. Use the information in this student performance. In recognition of Guide to create the best possible learning tight school budgets, this guidance is environment for students and maintain a designed to present practical and often comfortable, healthy building for school low-cost actions you can take to identify occupants. and address existing or potential air quality Refer to A Framework for School problems.
Position Document on Resiliency in the Built Environment

ASHRAE and CIBSE Position Document on Resiliency in the Built Environment Approved by ASHRAE Board of Directors June 26, 2019 Approved by the CIBSE Board July 11, 2019 Expires June 26, 2022 © 2019 ASHRAE and CIBSE ASHRAE • 1791 Tullie Circle, NE • Atlanta, Georgia 30329-2305 • 404-636-8400 • www.ashrae.org CIBSE • 222, Balham High Road • London SW12 9BS • 0208 675 5211 • www.cibse.org © 2019 ASHRAE and CIBSE. For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without copyright holders' prior written permission. COMMITTEE ROSTER The ASHRAE and CIBSE Position Document on Resiliency in the Built Environment was developed by ASHRAE’s Resiliency in the Built Environment Position Document Committee formed on October 10, 2017, with David Under- wood as its chair. David Underwood Andrew Persily Retired NIST Oakville, ON, Canada Gaithersburg, MD, USA Scott Campbell Thomas Phoenix National Ready Mixed Concrete Association Clark Patterson Lee Milwaukee, WI, USA Greensboro, NC, USA Hywel Davies CIBSE Paul Torcellini London, United Kingdom Eastford, CT, USA Bill McQuade Chandra Sekhar AHRI National University of Singapore Arlington, VA, USA Singapore, Singapore The CIBSE Technology Committee was responsible for oversight of the CIBSE contribution to this position docu- ment. Cognizant Committees The chairperson of ASHRAE Technical Committee 2.10, Resilience and Security, also served as an ex-officio member: Jason DeGraw Arvada, CO, USA ASHRAE is a registered trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, owned by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. © 2019 ASHRAE and CIBSE. For personal use only.
A Comprehensive Thermal Comfort Analysis of the Cooling Effect of The

sustainability Article A Comprehensive Thermal Comfort Analysis of the Cooling Effect of the Stand Fan Using Questionnaires and a Thermal Manikin Sun-Hye Mun y, Younghoon Kwak y, Yeonjung Kim and Jung-Ho Huh * Department of Architectural Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea; [email protected] (S.-H.M); [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (Y.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-6490-2757 Contributed equally to this work. y Received: 14 August 2019; Accepted: 12 September 2019; Published: 17 September 2019 Abstract: In this study a quantitative analysis was performed on the effect on thermal comfort of the stand fan, a personal cooling device that creates local air currents. A total of 20 environmental conditions (indoor temperatures: 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30 ◦C; fan modes: off, low (L) mode, medium (M) mode, and high (H) mode) were analyzed using questionnaires on male and female subjects in their 20s and a thermal manikin test. The contents of the questionnaire consisted of items on thermal sensation, thermal comfort, thermal acceptability, and demands on changes to the air velocity. This step was accompanied by the thermal manikin test to analyze the convective heat transfer coefficient and cooling effect quantitatively by replicating the stand fan. Given that this study provides data on the cooling effect of the stand fan in quantitative values, it allows for a comparison of energy use with other cooling systems such as the air conditioner, and may be used as a primary data set for analysis of energy conservation rates.
Investigating Applicability of Evaporative Cooling Systems for Thermal Comfort of Poultry Birds in Pakistan

applied sciences Article Investigating Applicability of Evaporative Cooling Systems for Thermal Comfort of Poultry Birds in Pakistan Haﬁz M. U. Raza 1, Hadeed Ashraf 1, Khawar Shahzad 1, Muhammad Sultan 1,* , Takahiko Miyazaki 2,3, Muhammad Usman 4,* , Redmond R. Shamshiri 5 , Yuguang Zhou 6 and Riaz Ahmad 6 1 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Bosan Road, Multan 60800, Pakistan; [email protected] (H.M.U.R.); [email protected] (H.A.); [email protected] (K.S.) 2 Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Kasuga-koen 6-1, Kasuga-shi, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan; [email protected] 3 International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan 4 Institute for Water Resources and Water Supply, Hamburg University of Technology, Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 3, 20173 Hamburg, Germany 5 Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam-Bornim, Germany; [email protected] 6 Bioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (R.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (M.U.); Tel.: +92-333-610-8888 (M.S.); Fax: +92-61-9210298 (M.S.) Received: 4 June 2020; Accepted: 24 June 2020; Published: 28 June 2020 Abstract: In the 21st century, the poultry sector is a vital concern for the developing economies including Pakistan. The summer conditions of the city of Multan (Pakistan) are not comfortable for poultry birds.
Thermal Science Cooling Tower Performance Vs. Relative Humidity

thermal science Cooling Tower Performance vs. Relative Humidity BASIC THEORY AND PRACTICE Total Heat Exchange A mechanical draft cooling tower is a specialized heat exchanger G = mass rate of dry air [lb/min] in which two fluids (air and water) are in direct contact with each L = mass rate of circulating water [lb/min] other to induce the transfer of heat. Le = mass rate of evaporated water [lb/min] THW = temperature of hot water entering tower [°F] Ignoring any negligible amount of sensible heat exchange that TCW = temperature of cold water leaving tower [°F] hin = enthalpy of air entering [Btu/lb/dry air] may occur through the walls (casing) of the cooling tower, the heat hout = enthalpy of air leaving [Btu/lb/dry air] gained by the air must equal the heat lost by the water. This is Cp = specific heat of water = 4.18 [Btu/lb-°F] an enthalpy driven process. Enthalpy is the internal energy plus Win = humidity ratio of air entering [lb water/lb dry air] the product of pressure and volume. When a process occurs at Wout = humidity ratio of air leaving [lb water/lb dry air] constant pressure (atmospheric for cooling towers), the heat In order to know how much heat the air flowing through a cooling absorbed in the air is directly correlated to the change in enthalpy. tower can absorb, the enthalpy of the air entering the tower must This is shown in Equation 1. be known. This is shown on the psychrometric chart Figure 1. G (hout - hin) = L x Cp (THW - 32°) - Cp (L - Le)(TCW - 32°) (1) The lines of constant enthalpy are close to parallel to the lines of constant wet bulb.
ASHRAE Position Document on Filtration and Air Cleaning

ASHRAE Position Document on Filtration and Air Cleaning Approved by ASHRAE Board of Directors January 29, 2015 Reaffirmed by Technology Council January 13, 2018 Expires January 23, 2021 ASHRAE 1791 Tullie Circle, NE • Atlanta, Georgia 30329-2305 404-636-8400 • fax: 404-321-5478 • www.ashrae.org © 2015 ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAE's prior written permission. COMMITTEE ROSTER The ASHRAE Position Document on Filtration and Air Cleaning was developed by the Society's Filtration and Air Cleaning Position Document Committee formed on January 6, 2012, with Pawel Wargocki as its chair. Pawel Wargocki, Chair Dean A. Saputa Technical University of Denmark UV Resources Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Santa Clarita, CA Thomas H. Kuehn William J. Fisk University of Minnesota Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Minneapolis, MN Berkeley, CA H.E. Barney Burroughs Jeffrey A. Siegel Building Wellness Consultancy, Inc. The University of Toronto Johns Creek, GA Toronto, ON, Canada Christopher O. Muller Mark C. Jackson Purafil Inc. The University of Texas at Austin Doraville, GA Austin, TX Ernest A. Conrad Alan Veeck BOMA International National Air Filtration Association Washington DC Virginia Beach, VA Other contributors: Dean Tompkins Madison, WI for his contribution on photocatalytic oxidizers Paul Francisco, Ex-Officio Cognizant Committee Chair Environmental Health Committee University of Illinois Champaign, IL ASHRAE is a registered trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, owned by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. © 2015 ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only.
Recommended Qualification Test Procedure for Solar Absorber.Pdf

Date: 2004-09-10 Editor Bo Carlsson1 IEA Solar Heating and Cooling Program Task 27 Performance of Solar Façade Components Project: Service life prediction tools for Solar Collectors Recommended qualification test procedure for solar absorber surface durability 1 Address: SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, P.O.Box 857, SE-50115 Borås, e-mail: [email protected] Contents Page Foreword.............................................................................................................................................................iv Introduktion .........................................................................................................................................................v 1 Scope ......................................................................................................................................................1 2 Normative references ............................................................................................................................1 3 Terms and definitions ...........................................................................................................................2 4 Requirements and classification..........................................................................................................3 5 Test methods for assessing material properties as measure of absorber performance...............4 5.1 Sampling and preparation of test specimens.....................................................................................4
Thermal Comfort in a Naturally-Ventilated Educational Building

Thermal Comfort in a Naturally-Ventilated Educational Building David Mwale Ogoli Judson College, Elgin, IL ABSTRACT: A comprehensive study of thermal comfort in a naturally ventilated education building (88,000 ft2) in a Chicago suburb will be conducted with 120 student subjects in 2007. This paper discusses some recent trends in worldwide thermal comfort studies and presents a proposal of research for this building through a series of questionnaire tables. Two research methods used in thermal comfort studies are field studies and laboratory experiments in climate-chambers. The various elements that constitute a “comfortable” thermal environment include physical factors (ambient air temperature, mean radiant temperature, air movement and humidity), personal factors (activity and clothing), classifications (gender, age, education, etc.) and psychological expectations (knowledge, experience, psychological effect of visual warmth by, say, a fireplace). Comparisons are made using data gathered from Nairobi, Kenya. Keywords: Comfort, temperature, humidity and ventilation INTRODUCTION The “comfort zone” is an appropriate design goal for a deterministic mechanical system but analysis of many international field studies by researchers has questioned its relevance to passive solar buildings (Humphreys, 1976; Auliciems, 1978; Forwood, 1995; Baker and Standeven, 1996; Standeven and Baker, 1995; Milne, 1995;). Givoni (1998) revised his already authoritative and notable work on the building bio-climatic chart having recognized this new position. These revisions reflect a paradigm shift in thermal comfort for people relative to their thermal environment. The American Society of Heating, Ventilating and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) has been discussing how people adapt to higher indoor temperatures in naturally ventilated buildings (Olesen, 2000). There is mounting evidence (Humphreys, 1996; Karyono, 2000) that confirms that thermal perceptions are affected by factors that are not recognized by current comfort standards.
Evaluation of the Effect of Relative Humidity of Air on the Coefficients of Critical Flow Venturi Nozzles

Evaluation of the Effect of Relative Humidity of Air on the Coefficients of Critical Flow Venturi Nozzles K. Chahine and M. Ballico National Measurement Institute, Australia P O Box 264, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia [email protected] Abstract atmospheric pressures. To establish stable sonic conditions in the nozzle, the down-stream end of the nozzle is usually connected to a high-capacity vacuum At NMIA, volumetric standards such as Brooks pump, with the up-stream end connected to the meter- or bell provers are used to calibrate critical flow Venturi under-test. During calibration the test-flowmeter draws nozzles or “sonic nozzles”. These nozzles, which are air from the laboratory at or near atmospheric pressures extremely stable, are used by both NMIA and Australian and temperature, and with relative humidity varying accredited laboratories to establish continuous flows for between 40% and 60%. The mass flowrate produced by the calibration of gas flow meters. For operational the nozzles is calculated based on the calibrated values of reasons, sonic nozzles are generally calibrated using dry the nozzle coefficient, the measured up-stream pressure air but later used with standard atmospheric air at various and the density calculated from the air temperature, humidity levels either drawn or blown through the meter- pressure and humidity [2]. under-test. Although the accepted theoretical calculations for determining the mass flow through a sonic nozzle At present, any effect of the relative humidity on the incorporate corrections for the resulting change in air nozzle coefficients is considered as negligible, as various density, as laboratories seek to reduce uncertainties the authors have estimated the systematic error at 0.02% for validity of this assumption warrants further examination.
Psychrometrics Outline

Psychrometrics Outline • What is psychrometrics? • Psychrometrics in daily life and food industry • Psychrometric chart – Dry bulb temperature, wet bulb temperature, absolute humidity, relative humidity, specific volume, enthalpy – Dew point temperature • Mixing two streams of air • Heating of air and using it to dry a product 2 Psychrometrics • Psychrometrics is the study of properties of mixtures of air and water vapor • Water vapor – Superheated steam (unsaturated steam) at low pressure – Superheated steam tables are on page 817 of textbook – Properties of dry air are on page 818 of textbook – Psychrometric charts are on page 819 & 820 of textbook • What are these properties of interest and why do we need to know these properties? 3 Psychrometrics in Daily Life • Sea breeze and land breeze – When and why do we get them? • How do thunderstorms, hurricanes, and tornadoes form? • What are dew, fog, mist, and frost and when do they form? • When and why does the windshield of a car fog up? – How do you de-fog it? Is it better to blow hot air or cold air? Why? • Why do you feel dry in a heated room? – Is the moisture content of hot air lower than that of cold air? • How does a fan provide relief from sweating? • How does an air conditioner provide relief from sweating? • When does a soda can “sweat”? • When and why do we “see” our breath? • Do sailboats perform better at high or low relative humidity? Key factors: Temperature, Pressure, and Moisture Content of Air 4 Do Sailboats Perform Better at low or High RH? • Does dry air or moist air provide more thrust against the sail? • Which is denser – humid air or dry air? – Avogadro’s law: At the same temperature and pressure, the no.
Environmental and Safety Considerations for Solar Heating and Cooling Applications

IMBSIR 78-1532 Environmental and Safety Con- siderations for Solar Heating and Cooling Applications David Waksman John Holton Solar Criteria and Standards Program Building Economics and Regulatory Technology Division Center for Building Technology National Engineering Laboratory National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234 September 1978 Prepared for Department of Energy Office of Conservation and Solar Applications Washington, D.C. and Department of Housing and Urban Development Division of Energy, Building Technology and Standards Washington, D.C. 20410 "OC — 1 100 . U56 tf78-1532 / m faWeffa! Sireal of Stansf&ri* MAY 1 4 1979 NBSIR 78-1532 * »r ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY CON- SIDERATIONS FOR SOLAR HEATING AND COOLING APPLICATIONS David Waksman John Holton Solar Criteria and Standards Program Building Economics and Regulatory Technology Division Center for Building Technology National Engineering Laboratory National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234 September 1978 Prepared for Department of Energy Office of Conservation and Solar Applications Washington, D.C. and Department of Housing and Urban Development Division of Energy, Building Technology and Standards Washington, D.C. 20410 ; ; . a.c,: u j\, i \ : V. - - ( X id'..' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary Dr. Sidney Harman, Under Secretary Jordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 3. FIRE SAFETY PROVISIONS . 2 3.1 FLAMMABLE MATERIALS 2 3.2 FIRE RESISTANCE OF BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 6 3.3 EMERGENCY ACCESS AND EGRESS 7 A. PROTECTION OF AIR AND POTABLE WATER 8 A. 1 PROTECTION OF POTABLE WATER 9 A.