DOCSLIB.ORG

Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Nicolás Abadia Cardiff University Hasan Abbas University of Glasgow Qammer Hussain Abbasi University of Glasgow Amor Abdelkader Bournemouth University Mohammed Abdul Qadeer Sage (UK) Ltd Luis Acevedo SpectCell Limited (UK) Nuran Acur University of Glasgow Dave Adams University of Glasgow Peter Adey Royal Holloway, Univ of London Ozohu Adoh Epara Muhammed Afolabi London Sch of Hygiene and Trop Medicine Ankush Aggarwal University of Glasgow Jessica Agnew-Blais King's College London Suyog Aher Health Innovations UK Ltd Saima Ahmed The University of Manchester Zubair Ahmed University of Birmingham Imad Ahmed University of Oxford Stuart Ainsworth Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine James Aird University of Edinburgh Alper Akay University of East Anglia Ali Akgun Speciality Scanners Ltd 1 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Pinar Akman University of Leeds Nazmi Orkun Akseli Durham University Alaa Al Khourdajie Imperial College London Mohammed Al Qaraghuli University of Strathclyde Danish Alam Epitomical Limited Harith Alani Open University Laith Al-Ani University of Baghdad Adanna Alaoma Legally Free Limited David Al-Attar University of Cambridge Andreas Alber The Pirbright Institute Paul Albert Swansea University Tim Albrecht University of Birmingham Bashir Al-Diri University of Lincoln Justin Ales University of St Andrews Asad Ali Identity Methods Limited Abdullah Al-Khalidi University of Glasgow Matthew Allan Fintech Sandpit Mark Allen Durham University John Allen Elekta UK Ltd Harriet Allen University of Nottingham Thorsten Allers University of Nottingham 2 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Mirjam Allik University of Glasgow David Allinson Loughborough University Nigel Allinson University of Lincoln Kathryn Almack University of Hertfordshire Natasha Alvarado University of Bradford Giuseppina Amato Queen's University of Belfast Carrie Ambler Durham University Pouya Amiri Imperial College London Christos Anagnostopoulos University of Glasgow Janet Anders University of Exeter Jens Andersen University of Exeter Robert Anderson African Lakes Company Limited Emma-Louise Anderson University of Leeds Marta Andrés Miguel University College London David Andress University of Portsmouth Jane Andrews University of the West of England Johannes Angermuller Open University Angela Angulo University of Bedfordshire Sadaf Anjum Grow Biotech PLC Thomas Boysen Anker University of Glasgow Imran Shafique Ansari University of Glasgow 3 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Georgios Antonopoulos Teesside University Marco Antonsich Loughborough University Rob Appleby The University of Manchester Francesco Antonio Aprile Imperial College London Ognjen Arandjelovic University of St Andrews Simon Archer University of Surrey Nikolaos Argyris Loughborough University Angela Aristidou University College London Cherie Armour Queen's University of Belfast Sahla Aroussi University of Leeds Miryam Arredondo-Arechavala Queen's University of Belfast Lauren Arrington University of Liverpool Robert Arthern NERC British Antarctic Survey Tohid Asefi Technical University of Munich Zahid Asghar University of Lincoln Moizzah Asif University of South Wales Andrew Aspden Newcastle University Max Atanassov Atanassov Ali Ataullah Open University Davidson Ateh BioMoti Panos Athanasopoulos Lancaster University 4 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Carolyn Atkins STFC - Laboratories David Atkinson University of Hull Rowland Graham Atkinson University of Sheffield Rachael Attwood University of Westminster Sascha Auerbach University of Nottingham Charles Augarde Durham University Alessandro Aurigi University of Plymouth Kenneth Austin University of Bristol Ross Authers Clarks Vitali Averbukh Imperial College London Davide Avino University of Liverpool Wendy Ayres-Bennett University of Cambridge Vicki Ayton University of Chester Tallat Azad Storelectric Jaylan Azer University of Glasgow Akintunde Babatunde University of Leeds Csanad Bachrati University of Lincoln Paul Badenhorst University of Birmingham Andrew Baggaley Newcastle University Anne-Marie Bagnall Leeds Beckett University Harsha Bagur CashLobe 5 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Jiping Bai University of South Wales John Baison RAGT Seeds Ltd (UK) Adam Baker Cranfield University Rachel Baker Glasgow Caledonian University Camille Baker University for the Creative Arts Kate Baker University of Liverpool Sarah Baker University of Sheffield Violeta Balinskaite Imperial College London Edward Ball University of Sheffield Christopher Ballance University of Oxford Cassandre Balosso-Bardin University of Lincoln Alina Baluch University of St Andrews Alexandra Bamji University of Leeds Dylan Banks Iceni Labs Hongwei Bao University of Nottingham Sian Barber Queen's University of Belfast Ana Barbosa University of Bradford Jennifer Barclay University of East Anglia John Barker Simply Do Ideas Clare Barlow Science Museum Group Natasha Barlow University of Leeds 6 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Sarah Barman Kingston University Payam Barnaghi Imperial College London Lucy Barnes University College London Anna Barnett University of Sussex Matthew Barr University of Glasgow Josh Barras The Welding Institute Harry Barraza LGC Group Rachael Barry Imperial College London Thomas Bartlett University of Glasgow Ruth Bartlett University of Southampton Anne Barton The University of Manchester Zafar Bashir University of Bristol Anahid Basiri University of Glasgow John Batchelor University of Kent Sarah Bate Bournemouth University Michael Bate University of York Victoria Bates University of Bristol David Bates University of Nottingham Charlotte Batley Phoremost Alan Batterham Teesside University Martin Bauer Durham University 7 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Carlton Baugh Durham University Thomas Bauska NERC British Antarctic Survey Keith Howard Bean National Composites Centre Dayne Beccano-Kelly Cardiff University Ulrike Bechtold University of Essex Kristen Beck University of Lincoln Carly Beckerman Durham University Jens Beckmann Durham University Ana Beduschi University of Exeter Konstantinos Beis Imperial College London Mohammad Belal National Oceanography Centre Ataur Belal University of Sheffield Robert Bell C-Tech Innovation Ltd Steven Belmain University of Greenwich Robin Bendrey University of Edinburgh Yoselin Benitez-Alfonso University of Leeds Martin Bennett University of Cambridge Ben Bennett University of Greenwich Eloisa Bentivegna IBM United Kingdom Limited Sarah Bentley Northumbria University Victor Beresnevich University of York 8 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation David Berezan The University of Manchester Christos Bergeles King's College London Megan Bergkessel University of Dundee Susan Andrea Bernal Lopez University of Leeds Andrea Bernardi Imperial College London Catherine Berry University of Glasgow Jacopo Bertolotti University of Exeter Paul Best Queen's University of Belfast Conceicao Bettencourt University College London Oliver Betts National Railway Museum Steve Bevan University of Lincoln Rebecca Beveridge University of Strathclyde Sonia Bhalotra University of Warwick Gurminder Bhambra University of Sussex Ayush Bhandari Imperial College London Ramjee Bhandari University of Glasgow Fadil Bidmos Imperial College London Stefanie Biedermann Open University Andrew Biggin University of Liverpool John Simeon Biggins University of Cambridge Christian Billing University of Hull 9 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Simon Biltcliffe UK Research and Innovation Nuno Bimbo University of Southampton Lynne Bingle University of Sheffield Joanna Birch University of Glasgow Matthew Birket The University of Manchester Martin Birkett Northumbria University Thomas Bishop University of Lincoln Adrien Bizeray Brill Power Ltd Maarten Blaauw Queen's University of Belfast Matthew Blackett Coventry University Kirstie Blair University of Strathclyde Jo Blanden University of Surrey James Nicholas Blaza University of York Stefan Bleeck University of Southampton Simon Blockley Royal Holloway, Univ of London Marina Bloj University of Bradford Jamie Blundell University of Cambridge Kevin Blyth University of Glasgow Annette Boaz London Sch of Hygiene and Trop Medicine Carola Boehm Staffordshire University Jan Boehnke University of Dundee 10 Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College Member List 7 July 2021 Name Organisation Emile Bojesen University of Winchester Jessica Boland The University of Manchester Tobias Bolch University of St Andrews Guido Bolognesi Loughborough University Edward Bolt University of Nottingham Johannes Boltze University of Warwick Robin Bon University of Leeds Emma Bond University of St Andrews Marco Borghesi Queen's University of Belfast Erica Borgstrom Open University Jorunn Indra Berit Bos The James Hutton Institute Avi Boukli Open University Fay Bound Alberti University of York Michael Bourlakis Cranfield University Christopher Bowen University of Bath Robert Bowman Queen's University of Belfast Radha Boya The University of Manchester Michael Braddick
Load more

Recommended publications
  • D3.3 Initial Technical & Logical Architecture and Future Work
    D3.3 Initial Technical & Logical Architecture and future work recommendations ECP 2008 DILI 558001 Europeana v1.0 D3.3 Initial Technical & Logical Architecture and future work recommendations Deliverable number D3.3 Dissemination level Public Delivery date 30 July 2010 Status Final Makx Dekkers, Stefan Gradmann, Jan Author(s) Molendijk eContentplus This project is funded under the eContentplus programme1, a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable. 1 OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p. 1. 1/14 D3.3 Initial Technical & Logical Architecture and future work recommendations 1. Introduction This deliverable has two tasks: To characterise the technical and logical architecture of Europeana as a system in its 1.0 state (that is to say by the time of the ‘Rhine’ release To outline the future work recommendations that can reasonably be made at that moment. This also provides a straightforward and logical structure to the document: characterisation comes first followed by the recommendations for future work. 2. Technical and Logical Architecture From a high-level architectural point of view, Europeana.eu is best characterized as a search engine and a database. It loads metadata delivered by providers and aggregators into a database, and uses that database to allow users to search for cultural heritage objects, and to find links to those objects. Various methods of searching and browsing the objects are offered, including a simple and an advanced search form, a timeline, and an openSearch API. It is also important to describe what Europeana.eu does not do, even though people sometimes expect it to.
    [Show full text]
  • A Knowledge Discovery Approach
    Semantic XML Tagging of Domain-Specific Text Archives: A Knowledge Discovery Approach Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademisches Grades Doktoringenieur (Dr.-Ing.) angenommen durch die Fakult¨at fur¨ Informatik der Otto-von-Guericke-Universit¨at Magdeburg von Diplom-Kaufmann Peter Karsten Winkler, geboren am 1. Oktober 1971 in Berlin Gutachterinnen und Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Myra Spiliopoulou Prof. Dr. Gunter Saake Prof. Dr. Stefan Conrad Ort und Datum des Promotionskolloquiums: Magdeburg, 22. Januar 2009 Karsten Winkler. Semantic XML Tagging of Domain-Specific Text Archives: A Knowl- edge Discovery Approach. Dissertation, Faculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, January 2009. Contents List of Figures v List of Tables vii List of Algorithms xi Abstract xiii Zusammenfassung xv Acknowledgments xvii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 TheAbundanceofText ............................ 1 1.2 Defining Semantic XML Markup . 3 1.3 BenefitsofSemanticXMLMarkup . 9 1.4 ResearchQuestions ............................... 12 1.5 ResearchMethodology ............................. 14 1.6 Outline...................................... 16 2 Literature Review 19 2.1 Storage, Retrieval, and Analysis of Textual Data . ....... 19 2.1.1 Knowledge Discovery in Textual Databases . 19 2.1.2 Information Storage and Retrieval . 23 2.1.3 InformationExtraction. 25 2.2 Discovering Concepts in Textual Data . 26 2.2.1 Topic Discovery in Text Documents . 27 2.2.2 Extracting Relational Tuples from Text . 31 2.2.3 Learning Taxonomies, Thesauri, and Ontologies . 35 2.3 Semantic Annotation of Text Documents . 39 2.3.1 Manual Semantic Text Annotation . 40 2.3.2 Semi-Automated Semantic Text Annotation . 43 2.3.3 Automated Semantic Text Annotation . 47 2.4 Schema Discovery in Marked-Up Text Documents .
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography [Abiteboul and Kanellakis, 1989] Serge Abiteboul and Paris Kanellakis
    507 Bibliography [Abiteboul and Kanellakis, 1989] Serge Abiteboul and Paris Kanellakis. Object identity as a query language primitive. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pages 159–173, 1989. [Abiteboul et al., 1995] Serge Abiteboul, Richard Hull, and Victor Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, Massachussetts, 1995. [Abiteboul et al., 1997] Serge Abiteboul, Dallan Quass, Jason McHugh, Jennifer Widom, and Janet L. Wiener. The Lorel query language for semistructured data. Int. J. on Digital Libraries, 1(1):68–88, 1997. [Abiteboul et al., 2000] Serge Abiteboul, Peter Buneman, and Dan Suciu. Data on the Web: from Relations to Semistructured Data and XML. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 2000. [Abiteboul, 1997] Serge Abiteboul. Querying semi-structured data. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Database Theory (ICDT’97), pages 1–18, 1997. [Abrahams et al., 1996] Merryll K. Abrahams, Deborah L. McGuinness, Rich Thomason, Lori Alperin Resnick, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Violetta Cavalli-Sforza, and Cristina Conati. NeoClassic tutorial: Version 1.0. Technical report, Artificial Intelligence Prin- ciples Research Department, AT&T Labs Research and University of Pittsburgh, 1996. Available as http://www.bell-labs.com/project/classic/papers/NeoTut/NeoTut. html. [Abrett and Burstein, 1987] Glen Abrett and Mark H. Burstein. The KREME knowledge editing environment. Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, 27(2):103–126, 1987. [Abrial, 1974] J. R. Abrial. Data semantics. In J. W. Klimbie and K. L. Koffeman, editors, Data Base Management, pages 1–59. North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1974. [Achilles et al., 1991] E. Achilles, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology-Based Methods for Analyzing Life Science Data
    Habilitation a` Diriger des Recherches pr´esent´ee par Olivier Dameron Ontology-based methods for analyzing life science data Soutenue publiquement le 11 janvier 2016 devant le jury compos´ede Anita Burgun Professeur, Universit´eRen´eDescartes Paris Examinatrice Marie-Dominique Devignes Charg´eede recherches CNRS, LORIA Nancy Examinatrice Michel Dumontier Associate professor, Stanford University USA Rapporteur Christine Froidevaux Professeur, Universit´eParis Sud Rapporteure Fabien Gandon Directeur de recherches, Inria Sophia-Antipolis Rapporteur Anne Siegel Directrice de recherches CNRS, IRISA Rennes Examinatrice Alexandre Termier Professeur, Universit´ede Rennes 1 Examinateur 2 Contents 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Context ......................................... 10 1.2 Challenges . 11 1.3 Summary of the contributions . 14 1.4 Organization of the manuscript . 18 2 Reasoning based on hierarchies 21 2.1 Principle......................................... 21 2.1.1 RDF for describing data . 21 2.1.2 RDFS for describing types . 24 2.1.3 RDFS entailments . 26 2.1.4 Typical uses of RDFS entailments in life science . 26 2.1.5 Synthesis . 30 2.2 Case study: integrating diseases and pathways . 31 2.2.1 Context . 31 2.2.2 Objective . 32 2.2.3 Linking pathways and diseases using GO, KO and SNOMED-CT . 32 2.2.4 Querying associated diseases and pathways . 33 2.3 Methodology: Web services composition . 39 2.3.1 Context . 39 2.3.2 Objective . 40 2.3.3 Semantic compatibility of services parameters . 40 2.3.4 Algorithm for pairing services parameters . 40 2.4 Application: ontology-based query expansion with GO2PUB . 43 2.4.1 Context . 43 2.4.2 Objective .
    [Show full text]
  • Description Logics
    Description Logics Franz Baader1, Ian Horrocks2, and Ulrike Sattler2 1 Institut f¨urTheoretische Informatik, TU Dresden, Germany [email protected] 2 Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, UK {horrocks,sattler}@cs.man.ac.uk Summary. In this chapter, we explain what description logics are and why they make good ontology languages. In particular, we introduce the description logic SHIQ, which has formed the basis of several well-known ontology languages, in- cluding OWL. We argue that, without the last decade of basic research in description logics, this family of knowledge representation languages could not have played such an important rˆolein this context. Description logic reasoning can be used both during the design phase, in order to improve the quality of ontologies, and in the deployment phase, in order to exploit the rich structure of ontologies and ontology based information. We discuss the extensions to SHIQ that are required for languages such as OWL and, finally, we sketch how novel reasoning services can support building DL knowledge bases. 1 Introduction The aim of this section is to give a brief introduction to description logics, and to argue why they are well-suited as ontology languages. In the remainder of the chapter we will put some flesh on this skeleton by providing more technical details with respect to the theory of description logics, and their relationship to state of the art ontology languages. More detail on these and other matters related to description logics can be found in [6]. Ontologies There have been many attempts to define what constitutes an ontology, per- haps the best known (at least amongst computer scientists) being due to Gruber: “an ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualisation” [47].3 In this context, a conceptualisation means an abstract model of some aspect of the world, taking the form of a definition of the properties of important 3 This was later elaborated to “a formal specification of a shared conceptualisation” [21].
    [Show full text]
  • Will the Semantic Web Scale?
    Panel Discussion P3: Will the Semantic Web scale? New York Sheraton May 19th, 2004 Proposers: Panelists: Organizers: - Raphael Volz - Dr. Cathy Marshall - Raphael Volz - Carole Goble - Prof. Dr. Alon Y. Halevy - Daniel Oberle - Rudi Studer - Prof. Dr. Jürgen Angele - Prof. Dr. Ian Horrocks Panelist 1 Dr. Cathy Marshall Microsoft Corporation Texas A+M University Why the Semantic Web won’t scale the scaled semantic web seen as mass-market product “the Flowbee uses the suction power of your household vacuum to draw the hair up to the desired length, and then gives it a perfect cut.....every time.” Three important questions: • Will it really work? • Who needs it? • Is it safe? 3 will it work? evaluating the semantic web as metadata • compare the semantic web to a widely adopted metadata scheme like the MARC record used for library cataloging – MARC practitioners are members of a community and are trained to create metadata – MARC reduces interpretive load by careful choice of attributes, authority lists, & cataloging rules (AACR, e.g.) to constrain values – MARC records are controlled for interoperability and consistency in various ways (e.g. by clearinghouses like OCLC) – so... on-line catalog (OPAC) users know what to expect 4 will it work? evaluating the semantic web as metadata • by contrast, the semantic web is subject to the following pitfalls as it scales: – social structures for creating universal semantic web metadata are missing (local culture/practices/needs prevail) – semantic web metadata requires substantial interpretation of domain knowledge; underlying assumptions about use are highly situated – no way of ensuring interoperability, consistency, accuracy • e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd NASA/IEEE Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems
    Proceedings 3rdNASA/IEEE Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems Springer-Verlag LNCS vol. 3228 Edited by Michael G. Hinchey, James L. Rash, Walter F. Truszkowski and Christopher A. Rouff Please note: This is a complete draft of the text; the publisher will add the correct page numbers, etc. The current formatting, although not very neat, I is the way the publisher requires it from us. Preface Greenbelt, MD October 2004 Organizing Committee Mike Hinchey, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Jim Rash, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Walt Truszkowski, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Chris Rouff, SAIC I- _- Contents Ecology Based Decentralized Agent Management System Maim D. Pqirakhov, VincentA. Cicirello and William C. Regli ........................ 1 From Abstract to Concrete Nomin Agent Institutions Daide Grossi and Frank Dipm ............................................................ 12 Meeting the Deadline: Why, When and How Frank Dignum, Jan Broersen, Virginia Dignurn and John-Jules Meyer ................ 30 Multi-Agent Systems Reliability, Fuzziness, and Deterrence Michel Rudnimki and H&ne Bestougefl.. ................................................ 41 Formalism Challenges of the Cougaar Model Driven Architecture Shawn A. Bohner. Boby George. Denis Gracirnin andMichael G. Hinchey .......... 58 Facilitating the Specification Capture and Transformation Process in the Development of Multi-Agent Systems Aluizio Haendchen Filho, Nuno Caminah, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Arndt von Staa.. ............................................................................ 73 Using Ontologies to Formalize Services Specifications in Multi-Agent Systems Karin Koogan Breitman, Aluizio Haendchen Filho, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Am& von Staa ............................................................................. 93 Two Formal Gas Models For Multi-Agent Sweeping and Obstacle Avoidance Wesley Ken, Diana Spears, William Spears and David Thayer ...................... 1 13 A Formal kysisof Potential Energy in a Multi-agent System William M Spears, Diana F.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward an Open Knowledge Research Graph.Pdf
    THE SERIALS LIBRARIAN https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1540272 Toward an Open Knowledge Research Graph Sören Auera and Sanjeet Mann b aPresenter; bRecorder ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Knowledge graphs facilitate the discovery of information by organizing it into Knowledge graph; scholarly entities and describing the relationships of those entities to each other and to communication; Semantic established ontologies. They are popular with search and e-commerce com- Web; linked data; scientific panies and could address the biggest problems in scientific communication, research; machine learning according to Sören Auer of the Technische Informationsbibliothek and Leibniz University of Hannover. In his NASIG vision session, Auer introduced attendees to knowledge graphs and explained how they could make scientific research more discoverable, efficient, and collaborative. Challenges include incentiviz- ing researchers to participate and creating the training data needed to auto- mate the generation of knowledge graphs in all fields of research. Change in the digital world Thank you to Violeta Ilik and the NASIG Program Planning Committee for inviting me to this conference. I would like to show you where I come from. Leibniz University of Hannover has a castle that belonged to a prince, and next to the castle is the Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB), responsible for supporting the scientific and technology community in Germany with publications, access, licenses, and digital information services. Figure 1 is an example of a knowledge graph about TIB. The basic ingredients of a knowledge graph are entities and relationships. We are the library of Leibniz University of Hannover and we are a member of Leibniz Association (a German research association).
    [Show full text]
  • Scalable Approaches for Auditing the Completeness of Biomedical Ontologies
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Computer Science Computer Science 2021 Scalable Approaches for Auditing the Completeness of Biomedical Ontologies Fengbo Zheng University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-0186 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2021.128 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zheng, Fengbo, "Scalable Approaches for Auditing the Completeness of Biomedical Ontologies" (2021). Theses and Dissertations--Computer Science. 105. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cs_etds/105 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Computer Science at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Computer Science by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Owl2, Rif, Sparql1.1)
    http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/ http://www.deri.ie The Role of Logics and Logic Programming in Semantic Web Standards (OWL2, RIF, SPARQL1.1) Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) National University of Ireland, Galway 1 Outline ESWC2010 Quick intro of RDF/OWL/Linked Open Data OWL2 Overview: from OWL 1 to OWL 2 Reasoning services in OWL 2 OWL2 Treactable Fragments (OWL2RL, OWL2EL, OWL2QL) OWL2 and RIF OWL2 and SPARQL1.1 Time allowed: Implementing SPARQL, OWL2RL, RIF on top of DLV – The GiaBATA system 2 Example: Finding experts/reviewers? ESWC2010 Tim Berners-Lee, Dan Connolly, Lalana Kagal, Yosi Scharf, Jim Hendler: N3Logic: A logical framework for the World Wide Web. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), Volume 8, p249-269 Who are the right reviewers? Who has the right expertise? Which reviewers are in conflict? Observation: Most of the necessary data already on the Web, as RDF! More and more of it follows the Linked Data principles, i.e.: 1. Use URIs as names for things 2. Use HTTP dereferenceable URIs so that people can look up those names. 3. When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information. 4. Include links to other URIs so that they can discover more things. 3 RDF on the Web ESWC2010 (i) directly by the publishers (ii) by e.g. transformations, D2R, RDFa exporters, etc. FOAF/RDF linked from a home page: personal data (foaf:name, foaf:phone, etc.), relationships foaf:knows, rdfs:seeAlso ) 4 RDF on the Web ESWC2010 (i) directly by the publishers (ii) by e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 599, Giese, M., Skjaeveland, M
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Soylu, A., Kharlamov, E., Zheleznyakov, D., Jimenez-Ruiz, E. ORCID: 0000- 0002-9083-4599, Giese, M., Skjaeveland, M. G., Hovland, D., Schlatte, R., Brandt, S., Lie, H. and Horrocks, I. (2018). OptiqueVQS: A visual query system over ontologies for industry. Semantic Web, 9(5), doi: 10.3233/SW-180293 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/22928/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-180293 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Semantic Web 0 (0) 1–35 1 IOS Press OptiqueVQS: a Visual Query System over Ontologies for Industry 1 Editor(s): Freddy Lecue, Accenture Tech Labs, Ireland Solicited review(s): Vanessa Lopez, IBM Research, Ireland; Two anonymous reviewers Ahmet Soylu a;∗, Evgeny Kharlamov b, Dmitriy Zheleznyakov b, Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz c, Martin Giese c, Martin G.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Spaces of possibility Citation for published version: Wanggren, L & Milatovic, M 2014, Spaces of possibility: Pedagogy and politics in a changing institution. in A Wardrop & D Withers (eds), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting. HammerOn Press. <http://hammeronpress.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/PHA_Final.pdf> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: The Para-Academic Handbook General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 THE PARA-ACADEMIC HANDBOOK THE PARA-ACADEMIC HANDBOOK A TOOLKIT FOR MAKING-LEARNING- CREATING-ACTING edited by Alex Wardrop & Deborah Withers HammerOn Press THE PARA-ACADEMIC HANDBOOK: A TOOLKIT FOR MAKING-LEARNING-CREATING-ACTING © Individual authors, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is Open Access, which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build upon the work outside of its normal use in academic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this volume.
    [Show full text]