CONTENTS Magnox Graphite Core Decommissioning and Disposal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONTENTS Magnox Graphite Core Decommissioning and Disposal CONTENTS Magnox Graphite Core Decommissioning and Disposal Issues...............................................1 M.E. Pick Graphite Waste Treatment and Disposal – A UK Perspective on the Current Opportunities and Issues .....................................................................................15 J. McKinney, S. Barlow Current Status and Future Objectives for Graphite and Radium-bearing Waste Disposal Studies in France .....................................................................................23 O. Ozanam Aspects of Graphite Disposal and the Relationship to Risk: A Socio-Technical Problem ..............................................................................................27 G.B. Neighbour, M.A. McGuire Radiation Damage in Graphite — a New Model....................................................................39 M.I. Heggie, I. Suarez-Martinez, G. Savini, G.L. Haffenden, J.M. Campanera Thermodynamic Modelling of an Irradiated Reactor Graphite Thermochemical Treatment Process .............................................................................................................47 S.A. Dmitriev, O.K. Karlina, V.L. Klimov, G.Yu. Pavlova, M.I. Ojovan Current Status of the Radiological Characterization of the Irradiated Graphite from RBMK-1500 Reactor in Lithuania ...........................................................................57 V. Remeikis, D. Ancius, A. Plukis, R. Plukiene, D. Ridikas, A. Smaizys, E. Narkunas, P. Poskas Decontamination of Nuclear Graphite by Thermal Methods .................................................77 J. Fachinger GLEEP Graphite Core Removal and Disposal .......................................................................83 M. Grave Review of the Characterization of Nuclear Graphites in UK Reactors Scheduled for Decommissioning.......................................................................................99 A. Jones, L. McDermott, B. Marsden and T.J. Marrow Graphite Dust Explosibility in Decommissioning: A Demonstration of Minimal Risk.......109 A. Wickham and L. Rahmani Magnox graphite core decommissioning and disposal issues M.E. Pick Magnox South, Gloucester, United Kingdom Abstract. Graphite core dismantling and disposal will be a key issue for the decommissioning of the United Kingdom (UK) Magnox reactors. The irradiated graphite arisings from the UK gas cooled reactor programme represent a significant proportion of the radioactive wastes currently destined for the UK geological repository. Data on the graphite and radionuclide inventory of the Magnox reactor graphite cores are presented together with data on the core designs. Magnox reactor cores represent a significant fraction of the worldwide irradiated graphite inventory and the paper recognizes that there may be alternatives to geological disposal. Sources and arisings of carbon-14, which is one of the major long lived radionuclides of concern, are discussed along with wider aspects of the arisings and behaviour of carbon-14 in the environment. Indubitably, core graphite disposal and the technical challenges it poses is one of the major issues to address in achieving final site clearance in a cost effective manner and reducing the liability cost associated with disposal of graphite. 1. Introduction The major large volume irradiated materials at final dismantling of Magnox reactors are: - Graphite - Steels - Concrete Each has particular challenges; irradiated graphite represents one of the largest volumes of irradiated materials and poses particular technical challenges. It is also a material for which there are a range of possible treatment and disposal options. The United Kingdom (UK) NDA (Nuclear Decommissioning Authority) Business Plan, 2008–2011, (Ref.[1]) states that “We believe that, due to the absence of a solution for the disposition of activated graphite, it is not yet possible to make a business case for accelerating Magnox decommissioning. Nevertheless, we will complete work on the business case in line with our Strategy for discussion with Government and, subject to availability of funding and viable waste disposal routes, will continue to explore the option of identifying a lead Magnox site to act as ‘test site’ for reactor decommissioning”. This statement reflects the fact that the NDA has expressed the aspirational goal to achieve site clearance in 25 years, i.e. one generation [2]. This will pose additional challenges through the reduction in the period of radioactive decay before dismantling takes place, which will result in wastes of higher unit activity being handled. The current strategy for the core graphite at final site clearance is to remove the graphite blocks and place in baskets in 4 m stainless steel containers with the option of encapsulation in cement. This will of course result in an increase in the overall volume of waste. Current Lifecycle Baseline (LCBL) plans envisage that final site clearance involving dismantling of the core will not be until approximately 85 years after reactor shutdown. 1 2. Inventory In total there are 26 Magnox reactors in the UK situated on 11 sites (Fig. 1). All of these are now shut down with the exception of Oldbury (due to close 2008) and Wylfa (due to close 2012). The size and mass of the graphite cores underwent a progressive increase from ~1100 t on the earliest reactor cores at Calder Hall and Chapelcross to 5500 t on Wylfa reactor cores. Arisings of core graphite from individual Magnox reactor cores are shown in Fig. 2. • Magnox reactors - 26 units on 11 sites Operational Permanently • 22 units have been Shutdown permanently shutdown Hunterston A Chapelcross • Remaining 4 will shut Calder Hall 2008 to 2010 Wylfa Traws fynydd Sizewell A Berkeley Bradwell Oldbury Hinkley Point A Dungeness A FIG. 1. Magnox reactor sites in the UK. Graphite Tonnes Per Reactor 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Hall Wylfa fynydd ness A Bradwell Berkeley Oldbury Sizewell A Calder Traws kley Point A Chapelcross HunterstonDunge A Hin FIG. 2. Graphite core inventory of UK Magnox reactors. The total arisings of Magnox reactor core graphite in the UK are of the order 45 600 m3, which equates to around 57 000 t using a bulk density of 1.25 t m–3. The core graphite arisings are given in the UK Radioactive Waste Inventory [3] which quotes the radionuclide inventory at 100 years after shutdown as this corresponds to the assumed dismantling date. In addition, there are about 2300 t of graphite fuel struts and sleeves which were employed on the Berkeley and Hunterston A reactors; these arisings are stored in vaults on these sites. The core graphite is a mixture of Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) and Low Level Waste (LLW) depending on the core region from which it arose and the neutron flux it has been exposed to. The Magnox core graphite may be divided into the following components: 2 Moderator - Typically ILW Side Reflector - LLW/ILW Bottom Reflector - Typically LLW Top Reflector - LLW/ILW The Magnox core graphite was termed Pile Grade and was manufactured from petroleum coke by a synthetic route. Pile Grade A (PGA) graphite with a density of 1.70 g cm–3 was used for the moderator cores while Pile Grade B (PGB) graphite with a density of 1.64 g cm–3 was used for the reflectors. The graphite produced for the AGRs (Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors) in the UK was a higher density gilsocarbon with a density of 1.85 g cm–3 and used naturally occurring graphite as the filler source material and petroleum coke as the binder. 3. Radioactive inventory In the context of disposal, the major radionuclides of concern due to their long half-life are carbon-14 and chlorine-36. At shutdown of the reactors tritium is the predominant radionuclide in terms of Bq of radioactivity, but as this decays with a 12.3 year half-life after 30 years post-shutdown, carbon-14, which has a half-life of 5730 years, becomes the predominant radionuclide in terms of radioactivity. With respect to radiation dose cobalt-60, which has a half-life of 5.27 years, is the dominant contributor at shutdown and remains a major contributor for about 60 years after which the dose rates stabilize at a level about four orders of magnitude less than those at shutdown. Typical dose rates from the bulk graphite are 10 mSv h–1 at shutdown, falling to 1 mSv h–1 after 20 years, 0.1 mSv h–1 after 40 years and 0.001 mSv–1 after 80 years. The reduction in dose rate is mainly a consequence of cobalt-60 decay. The UK Radioactive Waste Inventory [3] shows an overall average total of carbon-14 in the Magnox core graphite of about 3200 TBq. Carbon-14 Carbon-14 is produced in gas-cooled reactors by neutron activation. The relevant reactions are: (a) 13C (n,γ) 14C (b) 14N (n,p) 14C (c) 17O (n,α) 14C Carbon-13 is a naturally occurring isotope (1.11%) of carbon. Nitrogen-14 is the predominant isotope of nitrogen (99.63%) and occurs as an impurity in graphite at ppm levels; however, the neutron activation cross-section is relatively large so this route is a significant source of carbon-14 in graphite. Carbon-14 is also produced in the carbon dioxide coolant and an additional source here is activation of the naturally occurring oxygen-17 isotope which constitutes 0.037% of naturally occurring oxygen. A major issue in assessing the carbon-14 inventory of graphite is the level of nitrogen in the graphite. The first reported specification for graphite for the UK nuclear industry is in a report by Rose and Shaw [4] dating from 1956. This report listed desired physical and mechanical properties along with chemical composition.
Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Decommissioning (LT) Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plan in Lithuania
    Security and Defence Nuclear Decommissioning (LT) Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plan in Lithuania Challenge (depending on the waste category), including the completion of the waste management COUNCIL REGULATION The decommissioning of a nuclear installation such as infrastructure where necessary; establishing the nuclear a power plant or research reactor is the final step in 4. implementation of the building demolition decommissioning assistance its lifecycle. It involves activities from shutdown and programme; programme of the Ignalina removal of nuclear material to the environmental nuclear power plant in Lithuania 5. obtaining the decommissioning licence once Unit 1 restoration of the site. The whole process is long and and Unit 2 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant are and repealing Regulation (EU) No complex: it typically takes 20 to 30 years. It is also 1369/2013 defueled; fraught with technical, technological and financiall 6. downgrading of radiological hazards. Council Regulation (EU) 2021/101 challenges. The EU legal framework sets the highest safety standards for all activities regarding nuclear Furthermore, knowledge and experience gained and Period of Application installations, including their decommissioning. lessons learnt under the programme with regard to 2021–2027 the decommissioning process shall be disseminated In application of its Act of Accession to the Union, among Union stakeholders, thus enhancing the EU Lithuania anticipated the shutdown of the two nuclear added value of the programme. reactors in Ignalina within the agreed deadlines (2004 and 2009). RELEVANT WEBSITE FOR MORE Actions INFORMATION The Union committed to provide financial support for The actions to be funded by the Ignalina programme https://europa.eu/!bC66CU the decommissioning, in accordance with approved plans, while keeping the highest level of safety.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Into the Localized Corrosion of Magnesium Alloy Magnox Al-80
    A Study into the Localized Corrosion of Magnesium Alloy Magnox Al-80 Ronald N. Clark‡*, James Humpage**, Robert Burrows*, Hugh Godfrey***, Mustufa Sagir****, Geraint Williams** ‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. *National Nuclear Laboratory, Unit 102B, Sperry Way, National Nuclear Laboratory, Stonehouse, GL10 3UT, UK **Swansea University, Materials Research Centre, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Crymlyn Burrows, Swansea, SA1 8EN, Wales, UK ***National Nuclear Laboratory, Workington Laboratory, Havelock Road, Derwent Howe, Workington, Cumbria, CA14 3YQ, UK ****Sellafield Limited, Hinton House, Birchwood Park Avenue, Risley, Warrington, Cheshire, WA3 6 GR, UK [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Magnesium (Mg) non-oxidizing alloy, known as Magnox, was historically used as a fuel cladding material for the first-generation of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas-cooled nuclear reactors in the UK. Waste Magnox is currently stored in cooling ponds, pending final disposal. The corrosion resistance of Mg and its alloys is relatively poor, compared to modern cladding materials such as zirconium (Zr) alloys, so it is important to have a knowledge of the chloride concentration/pH dependence on breakdown and localized corrosion characteristics prior to waste retrievals taking place. Our results show that Magnox exhibits passivity in high pH solutions, with charge transfer resistance and passive film thicknesses showing an increase with immersion time. When chloride is added to the system the higher pH maintains Magnox passivity, as shown through a combination of potentiodynamic and time-lapse/post corrosion imaging experiments. Potentiodynamic polarization of Magnox reveals a -229 mV-decade linear dependence of breakdown potential with chloride ion concentration.
    [Show full text]
  • Graphite Materials for the U.S
    ANRIC your success is our goal SUBSECTION HH, Subpart A Timothy Burchell CNSC Contract No: 87055-17-0380 R688.1 Technical Seminar on Application of ASME Section III to New Materials for High Temperature Reactors Delivered March 27-28, 2018, Ottawa, Canada TIM BURCHELL BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION Dr. Tim Burchell is Distinguished R&D staff member and Team Lead for Nuclear Graphite in the Nuclear Material Science and Technology Group within the Materials Science and Technology Division of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). He is engaged in the development and characterization of carbon and graphite materials for the U.S. Department of Energy. He was the Carbon Materials Technology (CMT) Group Leader and was manager of the Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Graphite Program responsible for the research project to acquire reactor graphite property design data. Currently, Dr. Burchell is the leader of the Next Generation Nuclear Plant graphite development tasks at ORNL. His current research interests include: fracture behavior and modeling of nuclear-grade graphite; the effects of neutron damage on the structure and properties of fission and fusion reactor relevant carbon materials, including isotropic and near isotropic graphite and carbon-carbon composites; radiation creep of graphites, the thermal physical properties of carbon materials. As a Research Officer at Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories in the U.K. he monitored the condition of graphite moderators in gas-cooled power reactors. He is a Battelle Distinguished Inventor; received the Hsun Lee Lecture Award from the Chinese Academy of Science’s Institute of Metals Research in 2006 and the ASTM D02 Committee Eagle your success is our goal Award in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category
    小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC 1.DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体/海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software 2.Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • WATTS 04-2013 P1 PARC Management Team / Bestuurspan Aug
    04-2013 WATTS Year 83 + 4m Monthly newsletter of the Pretoria Amateur Radio Club Maandelikse nuusbrief van die Pretoria Amateur Radio Klub. PARC, PO Box 73696, Lynnwood Ridge 0040, RSA web http://www.parc.org.za mail: [email protected] Bulletins: 145,725 MHz 08:45 Sundays/Sondae Relays: 1.840, 3.700, 7.066, 10.135, 14.235, 51.400, 438.825, 1297 MHz ZR6FD logo Activated frequencies are announced prior to bulletins Papier / Paper Drukwerk ZS6RH Swapshop: 2m and 7.066 MHz Live on-air after bulletins ZS6RH Bulletin repeats Mondays | herhalings : Maandae 2m 19:45 Another glimpse of the extensive facility operated by Iain-ZS5IE (more photos on QRZ.com) In this issue In hierdie uitgawe Next club events Fleamarkets at PMC Member news and activities Lede-nuus en Aktiwiteite Wed 1 May (public holiday) Sat 10 Aug Sat 7 Dec Technical Rig reviews Tegnies Club social at U.P. G7FEK limited space antenna Thursday 4 Apr 7pm Aluminium alloys Club committee meeting ● Page eight -- Bladsy agt Thursday 18 Apr 7pm WATTS 04-2013 p1 PARC Management team / Bestuurspan Aug. 2012 – Aug. 2013 Committee members Chairman, Contests Pierre Holtzhausen ZS6PJH [email protected] 012-655-0726 082-575-5799 Vice Chairman, SARL liason Fritz Sutherland ZS6SF [email protected] 012-811-3875 083-304-0028 Secretary, Clubs, Strategy Jean de Villiers ZS6ARA [email protected] 012-663-6554 083-627-2506 Treasurer, SARS Andre van Tonder ZS6BRC [email protected] 361-3292 082-467-0287 Rallies, Social Johan de Bruyn ZS6JHB [email protected] 012-803-7385 079-333-4107 Webmaster Graham Reid ZR6GJR [email protected] 083-701-0511 RAE, Bulletin co-ordinator Vincent Harrison ZS6BTY [email protected] 012-998-8165 083-754-0115 Repeaters, Technical Craig Symington ZS6RH [email protected] 081-334-6817 Technical, Kits.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactor Physics Calculations in the Nordic Countries
    ESPOO 2003 VTT SYMPOSIUM 230 The eleventh biennial meeting on reactor physics calculations in the Nordic VTT SYMPOSIUM 230 countries was arranged by VTT Processes in Otaniemi, Espoo and on board Tallink´s m/s Romantika on April 9–10, 2003. General reactor physics, calculational methods, a code system adapted for RBMK reactor analyses, and transmutation of nuclear waste were presented by representatives of universities and programme developers. Computer programmes are the most important tools of reactor physics. At the meeting there were presentations of VTT Processes’ new deterministic 3- dimensional radiation transport code MultiTrans and BWR simulator ARES based upon the AFEN model, and also of new features in internationally wellknown codes like CASMO-4E and POLCA (POLCA-T) together with Reactor physics calculations in the Nordic countries results obtained by these programmes. A code for PWR loading pattern search, called LP-fun, is being developed by Westinghouse and others. On the subject of code validation, measurements on SVEA-96+ fuel bundles in the PROTEUS facility had been analyzed with the PHOENIX4 code, reactor scram experiments in the Loviisa and Mochovce VVER reactors using CASMO-4, MCNP4B and HEXTRAN, results of gamma scanning by the PHOENIX4/POLCA7 combination. Some difficulties in predicting the power distribution in the reactor core with sufficiently good accuracy using any of the available code systems were reported by OKG. Heating of non-fuel regions by gamma radiation and neutrons had been investigated using the HELIOS lattice code. Calculational results for heat deposition from gamma radiation in the moderator tank of the Forsmark-1 reactor were reported by Risø.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Isanaturallyoccurring,Verydense,Metallic Definition Andcharacteristics Deposits Definition, Mineralogyand Proportion Ofu-235Tobetween 3And5percent
    Uranium March 2010 Definition, mineralogy and Symbol U nt deposits Atomic number 92 opme vel Definition and characteristics Atomic weight 238.03 de l Uranium is a naturally occurring, very dense, metallic 3 ra Density at 298 K 19 050 kg/m UK element with an average abundance in the Earth’s crust ne mi of about 3 ppm (parts per million). It forms large, highly Melting point 1132 °C e bl charged ions and does not easily fit into the crystal struc- Boiling point 3927 °C na ai ture of common silicate minerals such as feldspar or mica. st Accordingly, as an incompatible element, it is amongst the Mineral Hardness 6 Moh’s scale su r last elements to crystallise from cooling magmas and one -8 f o Electrical resistivity 28 x 10 Ohm m re of the first to enter the liquid on melting. nt Table 1 Selected properties of uranium. Ce Minerals Under oxidizing conditions uranium exists in a highly soluble form, U6+ (an ion with a positive charge of 6), and is therefore very mobile. However, under reducing conditions Other physical properties are summarised in Table 1. it converts to an insoluble form, U4+, and is precipitated. It is these characteristics that often result in concentrations Mineralogy of uranium that are sufficient for economic extraction. Uranium is known to occur in over 200 different minerals, but most of these do not occur in deposits of sufficient Uranium is naturally radioactive. It spontaneously decays grade to warrant economic extraction. The most common through a long series of alpha and beta particle emissions, uranium-bearing minerals found in workable deposits are ultimately forming the stable element lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Maec.19 70 (University of London) London
    COMPLEX & INCREMENTAL STRESS CREEP OF A HIGH STRENGTH ALUMINIUM ALLOY AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ALLOY: HIDUMINIUM RR58 SPECIFICATION DTD 731) by SURINDAR BAHADUR MATHUR Thesis presented in the Department of Mechanical Engineering for the Award of the Doctor of Philosphy in Mechanical Engineering of the University of London. Mechanical Engineering Department Imperial College of Science and Technology mAec.19 70 (University of London) London. ABSTRACT A theory for creep rates under complex and incremental stresses is deduced from experimental data concerning complex creep at elevated temperatures for the test material HIDUMINIUM RR 58 - Specification DID 731. The most important results are for tubular specimens tested at 150°C and 250°C under incremental loads. The analysis of results relates to steady state creep only. Modified relationships in stress equivalence and strain equivalence are proposed to account for thermal softening, polygonization, recrystallization and the resulting exaggerated flow in the direction of the applied shear. (The original equations are based on the hypothesis of Von Mises). A further relationship is suggested between the immediate total energy of distortion and the subsequent creep work rate. Results of the static tests and the results of the tests for creep behaviour under complex loading are presented and compared with the results of static torsion and simple incremental torsion creep tests on the basis of the proposed equations. An appendix describes the complex creep testing machine, furnace, extensometers
    [Show full text]
  • Vver and Rbmk Cross Section Libraries for Origen-Arp
    VVER AND RBMK CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES FOR ORIGEN-ARP Germina Ilas, Brian D. Murphy, and Ian C. Gauld, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA Introduction An accurate treatment of neutron transport and depletion in modern fuel assemblies characterized by heterogeneous, complex designs, such as the VVER or RBMK assembly configurations, requires the use of advanced computational tools capable of simulating multi-dimensional geometries. The depletion module TRITON [1], which is part of the SCALE code system [2] that was developed and is maintained at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), allows the depletion simulation of two- or three-dimensional assembly configurations and the generation of burnup-dependent cross section libraries. These libraries can be saved for subsequent use with the ORIGEN-ARP module in SCALE. This later module is a faster alternative to TRITON for fuel depletion, decay, and source term analyses at an accuracy level comparable to that of a direct TRITON simulation. This paper summarizes the methodology used to generate cross section libraries for VVER and RBMK assembly configurations that can be employed in ORIGEN-ARP depletion and decay simulations. It briefly describes the computational tools and provides details of the steps involved. Results of validation studies for some of the libraries, which were performed using isotopic assay measurement data for spent fuel, are provided and discussed. Cross section libraries for ORIGEN-ARP Methodology The TRITON capability to perform depletion simulations for two-dimensional (2-D) configurations was implemented by coupling of the 2-D transport code NEWT with the point depletion and decay code ORIGEN-S. NEWT solves the transport equation on a 2-D arbitrary geometry grid by using an SN approach, with a treatment of the spatial variable that is based on an extended step characteristic method [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Covert Plutonium Production from Unconventional Uranium Sources
    International Journal of Nuclear Security Volume 2 Number 3 Article 7 12-31-2016 Evaluation Of Covert Plutonium Production From Unconventional Uranium Sources Ondrej Chvala University of Tennessee Steven Skutnik University of Tennessee Tyrone Christopher Harris University of Tennessee Emily Anne Frame University of Tennessee Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/ijns Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Engineering Education Commons, International Relations Commons, National Security Law Commons, Nuclear Commons, Nuclear Engineering Commons, Radiochemistry Commons, and the Training and Development Commons Recommended Citation Chvala, Ondrej; Skutnik, Steven; Harris, Tyrone Christopher; and Frame, Emily Anne (2016) "Evaluation Of Covert Plutonium Production From Unconventional Uranium Sources," International Journal of Nuclear Security: Vol. 2: No. 3, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.7290/v7rb72j5 Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/ijns/vol2/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Nuclear Security by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/ijns. Chvala et al.: Evaluation Of Covert Plutonium Production From Unconventional Uranium Sources International Journal of Nuclear Security, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2016 Evaluation of Covert Plutonium Production from Unconventional Uranium Sources Tyrone Harris, Ondrej Chvala, Steven E. Skutnik, and Emily Frame University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Department of Nuclear Engineering, USA Abstract The potential for a relatively non-advanced nation to covertly acquire a significant quantity of weapons- grade plutonium using a gas-cooled, natural uranium-fueled reactor based on relatively primitive early published designs is evaluated in this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fuel Optimization and Problem of Xa9953256 Increasing Burnup and Cost Efficiency of Light Water Reactors in Russia
    NUCLEAR FUEL OPTIMIZATION AND PROBLEM OF XA9953256 INCREASING BURNUP AND COST EFFICIENCY OF LIGHT WATER REACTORS IN RUSSIA M.I. SOLONIN, Yu. K. BIBLASHCVLI, F.G. RESHETNIKOV, F.F. SOKOLOV, A.A. BOCHVAR All-Russia Research Institute of Inorganic Materials, Moscow, Russia Abstract Brief analysis is given of the results of WWER-1000 and WWER-440 fuel assembly (FA) and fuel rod operation to the average burn-up of 44 and 34 MW-day/kg U, respectively. The reliable operation of the fuel is noted which made it possible to outline the paths of further improvements in their fuel cycles. Based on a series of improvements reactors are being switched on a 4-year cycle; a 5-year cycle is contemplated for the WWER- 440. The fuel cycle of the boiling RBMK reactors is subjected to essential alterations. Specifically, the use of erbium oxide as an integral burnable absorber allows a higher enrichment of uranium and bum-up. To extend the burn-up a new zirconium alloy E-635 is assumed to be used as fuel rod claddings and other FA components; the alloy has higher corrosion and irradiation resistance. INTRODUCTION The current technical level of the PWR and BWR fuel production and the perfected system of the reactor management have allowed to provide the successful operation of PWR NPP to the average burn-up of ~45 MW* day/kg U in all countries of developed nuclear power. The differences in the reliability and FA serviceability as well as in the number of leaky fuel rods are rather small and the attention is usually not focused on this issue.
    [Show full text]