The Book of the Royal Horticultural Society
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
London's Soap Industry and the Development of Global Ghost Acres
London’s Soap Industry and the Development of Global Ghost Acres in the Nineteenth Century John Knight won a prize medal at the Great Exhibition in 1851 for his soaps, which included an ‘excellent Primrose or Pale-yellow-soap, made with tallow, American rosin, and soda’.1 In the decades that followed the prize, John Knight’s Royal Primrose Soap emerged as one of the United Kingdom’s leading laundry soap brands. In 1880, the firm moved down the Thames from Wapping in East London to a significantly larger factory in West Ham’s Silvertown district.2 The new soap works was capable of producing between two hundred and three hundred tons of soap per week, along with a considerable number of candles, and extracting oil from four hundred tons of cotton seeds.3 To put this quantity of soap into context, the factory could manufacture more soap in a year than the whole of London produced in 1832.4 The prize and relocation together represented the industrial and commercial triumph of this nineteenth-century family business. A complimentary article from 1888, argued the firm’s success rested on John Knights’ commitment ‘to make nothing but the very best articles, to sell them at the very lowest possible prices, and on no account to trade beyond his means’.5 The publication further explained that before the 1830s, soap ‘was dark in colour, and the 1 Charles Wentworth Dilke, Exhibition of the Works of Industry of All Nations, 1851: Catalogue of a Collection of Works On, Or Having Reference To, the Exhibition of 1851, 1852, 614. -
Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Elkington & Co. and the Art of Electro-Metallurgy, circa 1840-1900. Alistair Grant. A Thesis Submitted to the University of Sussex for Examination for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. September 2014. 2 I hereby declare that this thesis is solely my own work, and has not been, and will not be submitted in whole, or in part, to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature:……………………………………… 3 This PhD thesis is dedicated to my wife Lucy and my daughter Agnes. I would like to thank my wife, Dr. Lucy Grant, without whose love, encouragement, and financial support my doctoral studies could not have happened. Her fortitude, especially during the difficult early months of 2013 when our daughter Agnes was ill, anchored our family and home, and enabled me to continue my research and complete this PhD thesis. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Maurice Howard. Having nurtured my enthusiasm for Art History as an undergraduate at the University of Sussex from 1983-1986, when I approached him, 23 years later, about pursuing PhD research into Elkington & Co. -
Lyon Playfair: Chemist and Commissioner, 1818–1858
Science Museum Group Journal Lyon Playfair: chemist and commissioner, 1818–1858 Journal ISSN number: 2054-5770 This article was written by Ian Blatchford 05-04-2021 Cite as 10.15180; 211504 Research Lyon Playfair: chemist and commissioner, 1818–1858 Published in Spring 2021, Issue 15 Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/211504 Abstract Lyon Playfair was a multi-talented man: a scientist, administrator and politician whose life and influence deserve further research. This article concentrates on the period between 1818 and 1858, from Playfair’s birth to his appointment as Professor of Chemistry at the University of Edinburgh. His biographer (Sir Thomas Wemyss Reid) described his life as a ‘story not of adventure, but work’ and yet his record was one of energetic enterprise that had considerable impact. He was a rising star in the then fashionable world of chemistry, a favoured student of the founder of organic chemistry, Justus Liebig, and a central figure in the promotion of new ideas in agricultural science.[1] A career in science and the state saw him connected to the leading figures of both, and he played a crucial role in the conceptual and financial success of the Great Exhibition, and its legacy. His brilliance has been overshadowed by the extrovert Henry Cole, and yet Playfair was essential to the major educational reforms of their time. Component DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/211504/001 Keywords Lyon Playfair, chemistry, politics, biography, University of Edinburgh, Justus Liebig, Great Exhibition Introduction [2] Playfair was a versatile man: scientist, administrator and politician. This article concentrates on the period between 1818 and 1858, from his birth to his appointment as Professor of Chemistry at Edinburgh. -
Endrés As an Illustrator
chapter∑ 4 Endrés as an illustrator Franco Pupulin According to the definition provided by Botanical Gardens Conservation International, “the main goal of botanical illustration is not art, but scientific accuracy”. A botanical illustrator must portray a plant with enough precision and detail for it to be recognized and distinguished from another species, and the need for exactness is what fundamentally differentiates botanical illustration from more general flower painting. If, traditionally, the best botanical illustrators try to understand the structure of plants and to communicate that in an aesthetically pleasing manner, combining science and art, this was probably not the concern of Auguste R. Endrés when preparing his orchid illustrations in Costa Rica. He had, however, a remarkable artistic talent, and his activity was influenced by the great tradition of orchid painting. The results of his illustration work not only attain the highest levels of botanical accuracy, but set a new standard in orchid art and science. As we will see, only because his masterful plates were lost among the forgotten materials of Reichenbach’s venomous legacy, was Endrés’ work prevented from having a major influence on the discipline of botanical illustration. The golden age of botanical illustration in Europe Beginning in the 17th century, and more frequently during the Enlightenment of the 18th Century, European artists and scientists undertook major projects for collecting and cataloguing nature in its amazing variety. 1613 saw the publication of the Hortus Eystettensis1 (literally the Garden of Eichstätt), a landmark work in the history of botanical art and one of the greatest botanical sets ever created. -
Heritage Varieties Factsheet
Jam Yesterday Jam Tomorrow is a community led project funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund to uncover and restore the history of market gardening in Middlesex through research, oral histories and the building of a model market garden to showcase traditional methods of growing and lost varieties. To find out more visit: www.jamyesterdayjamtomorrow.com. Heritage Varieties Factsheet 1 Historical Context Throughout the 19th century, the economy of Middlesex was dominated by the need to feed London’s booming population. Parishes along the river, and those within easy walking distance of the hungry markets of London, became centres for commercial agriculture. Over time the rapid expansion of London’s urban area forced out market gardeners from central London into the southwest suburbs, and a number of Enclosure Acts allowed common grazing land to become market gardens. Farmers became horticulturalists, and farms became market gardens and orchards. The arrival of the railway to Twickenham, Teddington and Whitton in the middle of the-century allowed market gardeners to move away from the river, deeper into Middlesex. In many areas, employment in agriculture exceeded that in trade, manufacturing, and handicrafts. Gradually, however, as London continued to grow, house- building for the new ‘commuter classes’ began, and orchards began to give way to houses. The industry peaked in the 1870s, and then moved to the Hampton area, where large glasshouses allowed growers to Keens Strawberry was produce fruit and vegetables more efficiently. Several of the Hampton a popular local variety nurseries continued to thrive through the Second World War and after, from which the until their land was finally built upon to become Nurserylands housing modern strawberry derives. -
Boston Manor Park Conservation Management Plan Final Report
Boston Manor Park Conservation Management Plan Final Report Consultants Peter McGowan Associates with Morag Cross in association with Jura Consultants and LDN Architects May 2011 London Borough of Hounslow English Heritage Boston Manor Park Conservation Management Plan Final Report Consultants Peter McGowan Associates Landscape Architects and Heritage Management Consultants 6 Duncan Street Edinburgh EH9 1SZ 0131 662 1313 • [email protected] with Morag Cross in association with Jura Consultants and LDN Architects May 2011 Boston Manor Park 1 Conservation Management Plan May 2011 Contents Boston Manor Park site location (circled in red) 4 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 The Park today 5 1.3 Historical outline 6 1.4 Access 6 1.5 Ownership, boundaries and report coverage 7 1.6 Approach and presentation 7 2 Understanding the Park 8 2.1 Site, landform and geology 8 2.2 Urban context, urban design analysis 9 2.3 Noise 10 2.4 Zones of distinct landscape character 11 2.5 Landscape development of Boston Manor Park: summary chronology 16 2.6 Survey of designed landscape features 36 2.6.1 General 36 2.6.2 Archaeology 36 2.6.3 Water features 36 2.6.4 Built features 38 2.6.6 Access and circulation 45 2.5.7 Park facilities 49 2.5.8 Woodland, trees and gardens 52 2.5.9 Veteran and specimen trees 57 2.5.10 Planned or notable views 58 2.6 Planning designations and nature conservation 60 2.7 Park use and Friends 60 2.8 Park management 61 2.9 Strategic context 62 3 Analysis and Statement of Significance 64 3.1 Analysis, Park in its cultural context 64 -
London Metropolitan Archives Middlesex Sessions
LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 MIDDLESEX SESSIONS: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MA Reference Description Dates COUNTY ADMINISTRATION: LUNATIC ASYLUMS Maintenance of lunatics MA/A/C/001 Alphabetical register of lunatics, giving name, 1860 - 1888 date of admission, which asylum, 'how disposed of' MA/A/C/002 Register of lunatics Gives name, date of 1871 - 1877 maintenance order, to what asylum sent, 'how disposed of' MA/A/C/003/1853 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1853 8 MA/A/C/003/1865 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1865 53 MA/A/C/003/1866 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1866 73 MA/A/C/003/1867 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1867 46 MA/A/C/003/1868 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1868 47 MA/A/C/003/1869 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1869 64 MA/A/C/003/1870 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1870 8 MA/A/C/003/1872 Applications for maintenance of lunatics: 1872 Criminal lunatics 8 MA/A/C/003/1873 Applications for maintenance of lunatics: 1873 Matilda or Louisa Lewis 1 MA/A/C/003/1874 Applications for maintenance of lunatics 1874 6 LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 MIDDLESEX SESSIONS: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MA Reference Description Dates MA/A/C/003/1875/001 Applications for maintenance of lunatics (B-E) 1875 (items numbered 1875/001-024) MA/A/C/003/1875/025 Applications for maintenance of lunatics (E-M) 1875 (items numbered 1875/025-047) MA/A/C/003/1875/048 Applications for maintenance of lunatics (M-R) 1875 (items numbered 1875/048-060) MA/A/C/003/1875/061 Applications for maintenance -
Vol. 33 No.2 June 2015
WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL _____________________ Vol. 33 No.2 June 2015 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Vacant [email protected] Secretary Vacant [email protected] Treasurer Ms Muriel Sprott 1 Camellia Place, Whitton, Twickenham, Middlesex TW2 7HZ [email protected] Membership Mrs Betty Elliott Secretary 89 Constance Road, Whitton, Twickenham Middlesex TW2 7HX [email protected] Bookstall Manager Mrs. Margaret Cunnew 25 Selkirk Road, Twickenham, Middlesex TW2 6PS [email protected] Committee Member Claudette Durham Please direct all postal queries to the Treasurer Post Holders not on the Executive Committee Editor Mrs. Bridget Purr 8 Sandleford Lane, Greenham, Thatcham, Berks RG19 8XW [email protected] Programme Mrs. Kay Dudman Co-ordinator 119 Coldershaw Road, Ealing, London W13 9DU Projects Co-ordinator Brian Page 121 Shenley Avenue, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 6BU Society Archivist Yvonne Masson Examiner Paul Kershaw Webmaster Roland Bostock: [email protected] Society Web site www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk Subscriptions All Categories: £12 per annum Subscription year l January to 31 December If you wish to contact any of the above people, please use the postal or email address shown. In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No. -
Cultural Gifts Scheme & Acceptance in Lieu
Cultural Gifts Scheme & Acceptance in Lieu Report 2016 Contents Preface Acceptance in Lieu Cases 2015/16 Sir Peter Bazalgette, Chair, Arts Council England 4 14. William Turnbull sculptures 32 15. Joseph Mallord William Turner: Introduction The High Street, Oxford 34 16. Lucian Freud self-portrait and archive 36 Edward Harley, Chairman, Acceptance in Lieu Panel 5 17. Benozzo Gozzoli drawings 38 Allocations 5 18. Allan Ramsay: Prince Charles Edward Stuart 40 Hybrid offers 6 19. Sir Joshua Reynolds: 5th Earl of Carlisle 42 In situ cases 6 20. Plas Newydd chattels 44 Tax changes 7 21. Cartier tiara 46 Conditional Exemption 7 22. Sir Anthony van Dyck: Mrs Endymion Porter 48 Immunity from Seizure 7 23. Master of the Countess of Warwick: Portrait of Susan Bertie, later Countess of Kent 50 The Culture White Paper 7 24. George Romney: Portrait of John Fane 52 Thanks and acknowledgements 8 25. Glynn Parian ware collection 54 26. Hobson bookbinding archive 55 Cultural Gifts Scheme Cases 2015/16 27. Late 15th-century view of Florence 56 1. Great Seal of Queen Victoria 10 28. Rumbold desk 58 2 & 3. Two collections of paper peep-shows 12 29. Kennet archive 59 4. Isack Van Ostade landscape 14 30. Two antique busts from Houghton Hall 60 5. Sun Foundry showroom ceiling 16 31. Raffaellino del Garbo: Study of Drapery 62 6. Arundel table 17 32. Francisco José de Goya y Lucientes: 7. Bindman collection of political caricature prints 18 Three albums of prints 64 8. John Hamilton Mortimer: Witts Family Group 20 33. James Abbott McNeill Whistler: Three pastel portraits 66 9. -
Research Materials
Research materials There is no better way to understand a historic park or garden than to walk through it and see what’s there, but in order to understand it fully we need to look at primary and secondary sources for information. This presentation will give you an idea of the kind of the resources you might like to look through online, when visits to archives, libraries or indeed many of the sites themselves, are not possible. Sources fall in to two categories: Primary sources are usually found in museums, private archives and county or area record offices. They include old documents, letters, maps, plans, diaries, accounts books, census returns, parish registers, photographs, paintings and sketches. In normal times you can search collections and archive catalogues online and then make an appointment to go and see them. Secondary sources include published books and magazines, research articles and dissertations, copies of original items and a wealth of transcribed online information, databases and blogs. Fortunately, we can look through many of these sources from 1 the comfort of our own home. 1 Where to start? The handout that accompanies this presentation gives you a long list of sites that can be searched online - and there are many more! This can seem quite daunting so let’s look at the basics first 2 Don’t reinvent the wheel – check to see what is already known about the site. To find out if your site is a Registered Park or Garden use this link to the Historic England Heritage List: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/ The search box shown above takes you to an annotated map where a Registered Park or Garden will show up as a bright green area. -
Lost Heritage Varieties Factsheet
Jam Yesterday Jam Tomorrow is a community led project funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund to uncover and restore the history of market gardening in Middlesex through research, oral histories and the building of a model market garden to showcase traditional methods of growing and lost varieties. To find out more visit: www.jamyesterdayjamtomorrow.com. Lost Heritage Varieties Factsheet 1 Historical Context Throughout the 19th century, the economy of Middlesex was dominated by the need to feed London’s booming population. Parishes along the river, and those within easy walking distance of the hungry markets of London, became centres for commercial agriculture. Over time the rapid expansion of London’s urban area forced out market gardeners from central London into the southwest suburbs, and a number of Enclosure Acts allowed common grazing land to become market gardens. Farmers became horticulturalists, and farms became market gardens and orchards. The arrival of the railway to Twickenham, Teddington and Whitton in the middle of the-century allowed market gardeners to move away from the river, deeper into Middlesex. In many areas, employment in agriculture exceeded that in trade, manufacturing, and handicrafts. Gradually, however, as London continued to grow, house- building for the new ‘commuter classes’ began, and orchards began to give way to houses. The industry peaked in the 1870s, and then moved to the Hampton area, where large glasshouses allowed growers to Keens Strawberry was produce fruit and vegetables more efficiently. Several of the Hampton a popular local variety nurseries continued to thrive through the Second World War and after, from which the until their land was finally built upon to become Nurserylands housing modern strawberry derives. -
Return of Outdoor Memorials in London, Other Than Statues on The
1 s? s-> 11y i^ ^Aavaain^ <rii3DNv-$oi^ ^amainihwv tfAavaai ^UIBRARYQ^ ^UIBRARYQ^ ^EUNIVE %a3AiNa-]\\v %0i\m-i^ hoiimiti^ <TiH3NV-S 1% ^0KALIF(% ^OF-CALIFOfaj, ^EU ^lOSANCflfj> <^ o ft, /^\,% ft 7 s? v^ "^sajAiNfl-]^ ^AavaaiH^ ^amih^ <TiU3NV-S fQr ^UIBRARYtf/* <\WE-UNIVER% ^lOSASCElfj> ^UIBRAF or 30^ ^OJIIVJ-JO^ <riiJONVS01^ %MAINIUWV ^EUNIVERS//, CALIF % ^0F-CALIFC%, ^slOSANCElfj^, ^OF A I o %J13 AINf]-3VVv y<?Aav!iai Kfc '/- 10S-ANGEI&> &*MEI 2 £1 <X J X i s "%I3AIN(1 3^ ^fOJIlVJ-JO^ ^OJITVJ-JO^ Kto $clOS«lfj> ^OF-CAllFOfy* ^Ei & 15 '/HHAINIHttV* ni .1 • I LIBRARY \WEUNIYf LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL. RETURN OF OUTDOOR MEMORIALS IN LONDON, OTHER THAN STATUES ON THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS, MEMORIALS IN THE NATURE OF TOMBSTONES, MEMORIAL BUILD- INGS AND MEMORIAL TREES. Prepared by THE CLERK OF THE COUNCIL, under the direction of the Local Government, Records J and Museums Committee' of- die Council.* PRIMKD FOR THE LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL BY SOl'THWOOD, SMITH AND CO., LTU. And may be purchased through any Bookseller or direct from P. S. KING AND SON, 2 anti 4, Great Smith-btrkkt, Victoria-street, Westminster. SAV, Agents for tht zalt of the publications of the London County Council. I9IO. No. 1359. Price is. Od. Post Free is. 8$d >oo—25.7.10—337 „ S.S. 1776 v* 28 OCT. 1920 ^iTJCAL- — 4 * » » • •• • • < • * • • • • • « • • •- • • ... .. • • • ••••• -470 PREFACE The following is an extract from the report of the Local - Government, Records and Museums Committee, submitted /» to the Council on 5th July, 1910 : We have for some time held the opinion that the pre- paration of a return of outdoor memorials in London would form a valuable addition to literature concerning London, and would meet a great want.