Production Methodologies of Meat Analogues: a Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Production Methodologies of Meat Analogues: a Review http://isae.in/journal-of-agricultural-engineering-JAE Journal of Agricultural Engineering ISAE Vol. 58 (2): April-June, 2021 doi: 10.52151/jae2021581.1741 Production Methodologies of Meat Analogues: A Review Girija J.1, Kamalasundari S.2, Hemalatha G.3 and Umamaheswari T.4 1P.G. Student (Food Science and Nutrition), 2Assistant Professor (Food Science and Nutrition), Department of Food Policy and Public Health Nutrition,3Professor and Head (Food Science and Nutrition), 4Assistant Professor (Agricultural Microbiology), Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Community Science College and Research Institute, Madurai. Corresponding author email address: [email protected] Article Info ABSTRACT Manuscript received: Meat is a non-vegetarian food and is considered as a good source of quality nutrients. March, 2020 Though meat protein provide the required content of good quality protein for the body, Revised manuscript accepted: they are also associated with higher cholesterol and fat content, which prove to be a April, 2021 leading cause of serious health issues. This became the primary reason for increase in a shift in demands for plant-based protein source foods. The other reason is environmental impact of animal derived products. Meat analogues are plant-based good quality protein source of food that tastes like meat protein, and texture resemble that of meat. These plant-based meat analogues have some amount of anti-nutrients and allergic compounds, but they can be successfully removed by employing certain processing methods and resemble meat in its functionality properties. This approach of mimicking the plant- based foods to resemble meat involves understanding of the biochemical composition and three-dimensional structure of meat, and replicating those qualities using plant-based Keywords: Plant-based ingredients. In the current scenario, the best suitable methods of manufacturing meat meat alternative, promoting analogue are by extrusion and structuring techniques. The meat analogues satisfy the vegetarianism, meat analogue need of meat for both vegetarians and non-vegetarians. This review attempts to outline manufacturing techniques, the different manufacturing processes of meat analogue using plant-based foods, and to applications analyse the best suitable method. Meat has a distinct position in the food basket and of illness each year (Post, 2014; Grewal et al., 2014). has been widely consumed by the humans since pre- With the growing health concern of people across the historic era due to readily available source of energy, globe, the importance of health promoting foods is high quality proteins, palatability as well as images of increasing steadily that had created awareness among strength and power (Latvala et al., 2012). As a global the consumers to find meat alternatives (Aikinget al., average, per capita meat consumption has increased 2006). Animal-derived products also have challenges in to around 40 kg of meat during the year 2018 from 20 a sustainable manner. Plant-based eating is recognised kg during the year 2006. It is expected that increasing as not only nutritionally sufficient, but also as a way population, urbanization, industrialization, education to reduce the risk in all other health aspects. Meat and rise in income would cause 72 % higher demands analogues are the plant-based protein source foods that of meat consumption by the year 2030 (Godfray et al., taste like meat protein and texture resembling meat in 2010). Many researchers quote that consumption of its functionality in terms of physical properties and 120 g red meat/day or 30 g processed meat/day would sensory attributes. significantly raise the relative risk of colorectal cancer (Larsson and Wolk, 2006). The food borne pathogens Developing new meat analogues that are attractive found in meats, such as Salmonella, Campylobacter to the consumers is a challenge (Joshi et al., 2015). and E. coli are responsible for millions of episodes However, in the current scenario of technological April-June, 2021 Production Methodologies of Meat Analogues: A Review advancements, an acceptable and appreciable substitute taste identical to animal meat but are designed to be for meat products can be produced. There are several texturally similar and serve the same purpose as meat strategies to mimic the texture of meat (Narsaiah et al., in prepared foods (e.g., TVP). Since it is typically 2013), which depends on the type of meat product that used as an ingredient, functional plant-based meat may one wants to mimic. Meat products can be categorized require special formulation, just similar to how animal into ground, comminuted and whole muscle meat meat is prepared, flavoured, or tenderized for a specific products. The processed meat analogues should be able purpose. The important role of functional plant-based to mimick the original meat products. meat is replacing animal meat for reducing health claims. The main aim is to create plant-based meat from A review focussing on common forms of meat plant protein that retain their shape, texture, and flavour analogues, different protein sources used for meat through freezing, thawing, and cooking in a full range analogues, structuring and manufacturing techniques of prepared products. Certain plant and fungal foods of meat analogues from fibrous plant protein materials, can also replace animal meat as the focus of a meal by current research and future trends in meat analogue providing a whole-food product with a savoury taste processing is presented. and the mouthfeel of meat. The less processed foods, such as jackfruit, pulses, and certain mushrooms are Meat Analogue often naturally fibrous or high in protein. The list of Analogue can be defined as a compound that is ingredients used for the preparation of meat analogue structurally similar to another, but differs slightly and their purposes is given in Table 2. in composition. Meat analogue is the food which is structurally similar to meat but differs in composition. Recent researches were more focused on innovative Meat analogue, also called a meat substitute, mocks meat analogues from mushroom, pulses, and fruits meat or imitate meat approximates the aesthetic with good sensory attributes (texture, colour, flavour) qualities (primarily texture, flavour, and appearance) which is very important for acceptance of any and/or chemical characteristics of specific types of innovative product. Samard et al. (2019) compared meat (Sadler, 2004). This meat analogue is a healthier the texture characteristics of TVP among different and/or less expensive alternative to a particular meat protein products viz., isolated soy protein (ISP), isolated product due to its appearance and odour very much mung bean protein (IMBP), isolated peanut protein similar to meat (Kumar et al., 2017). Though many (IPNP), isolated pea protein (IPP), and wheat gluten vegetarian foods are available, but the variety for meat (WG) which were texturized by intermediate moisture analogue is very less. The most preferred meat analogue extrusion method. The result revealed that ISP and IPP is Texturized Vegetable Proteins (TVP). Generally, based TVPs displayed more sponge, like structure than meat analogues are made from soy-protein or gluten. the other proteins. This might be due to increasing Vegetable proteins sources are listed in Table 1. amounts of sulphur‐containing amino acids (Cystine and Methionine) of ISP, IPP and WG after extrusion. Sensory characteristics of different meat analogues The lowest essential amino acids content (Glutamic Functional plant-based meat ingredients, such as and Aspartic acid) was found in WG‐based TVP. The proteins and binding agents, are not intended to amount of loss was dependent on the intensity of Table1. Major non-meat protein sources suitable for meat analogue Sl . No. Type of protein Source Product Reference 1. Beta-conglycinin Soybean TVP, Tempeh, Tofu, Kinema Sun et al. (2008) 2. Glycinin, Vicilin Legumes Burmese tofu from chickpea Kang et al. (2007), Sharima et al. (2018) 3. Legumin, Albumins, Oil seeds TVP Marcone (1999); Anjum Globulins, Glutelins et al. (2011) 4. Gluten, Gliadins, Wheat, rye, barley Seitan Green and Glutenins Cellier (2007) 5. Mycoprotein Fusarium venenatum Quorn Denny et al. (Filamentous fungus) (2008) 138 Girija J, Kamalasundari S, Hemalatha G and Umamaheswari T JAE : 58 (2) Table 2. Major Ingredients of meat analogue and their purpose Ingredient and usage level Purpose Water - (50-80 %) Ingredient distribution, consistency of final product Textured vegetable proteins: Water binding, Soy-protein, wheat protein – (10-25 %) Texture/ mouth feel, Non texturized proteins: Appearance Egg white, whey protein- (4-20 %) Fat/ oil - (0-15 %) Flavour, texture/ mouth feel, colour Flavours/ spices - (3-10 %) Flavour: savoury, meaty, roasted, fatty, serumy, Flavour enhancement (e.g. salt) Binding agents: Wheat gluten, egg whites, gums and Texture, water binding, can determine production and hydrocolloids, enzymes, starches - (1-5 %) processing conditions Colouring agents: caramel colours, malt extracts - (0-0.5 %) Appearance/eye appeal extrusion process which determines the texture of the Maillard reaction. Wild et al., 2014 Maillard reaction meat analogue as quoted by Osen et al. (2015). occurs during heat treatment of almost every food, and bio-converts amino acids and sugars into various Anila and Suma (2018) developed TVP based on odorants, tastants and colorants as quoted by Chen et jackfruit bulb flour, seed flour and gluten in
Recommended publications
  • Ffects of Peanut Grits and Peanut Flour on Quality of Muffins
    ~FFECTS OF PEANUT GRITS AND PEANUT FLOUR ON QUALITY OF MUFFINS By NING-BIN KUO 'I Bachelor of Science in Home Economics Texas A & I University Kingsville, Texas 1978 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 1980 EFFECTS OF PEANUT GRITS AND PEANUT FLOUR ON QUALITY OF MUFFINS Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser ~~n- ii 1062960 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS · The author wishes to express her thanks and appreciation to her major adviser, Dr. Lea L. Ebro, for her patience, guidance, and as­ sistance throughout this study. Sincere appreciation is also expressed to my graduate corrmittee: Dr. Esther A. Winterfeldt and Miss Hazel Baker, for their encourage­ ment and support; and to Dr. J. Leroy Folks, for his invaluable as­ sistance in the research design and data analyses of this Study. Thanks are also expressed to the seven attribute panel members, for their cooperation and support. Without them, this study would not have been possible. A note of appreciation is extended to Jean Shipman, for the muffin photographs. Special recognition is due to Gold Kist, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia, and Southern Regional Research Center, USDA, New Orleans, Louisiana, for providing the peanut grits and peanut flour samples. Finally, special thanks and appreciation are given to my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Dod-yu Kuo, and my husband, Geng-Hwa Lin, for their understanding, constant encouragement, and inspiration. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION. 1 Purpose and Objectives • 3 Hypotheses . 3 Assumptions .•• 4 Limitations ••••.••• 4 Definitions .•••..•••• 4 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Peanut Flour Based Value Added Products for Malnourished Children
    International Journal of Medical Sciences Volume 6 | Issue 2 | October, 2013 | 59-64 RESEARCH PAPER Development of Peanut Flour Based Value Added Products for Malnourished Children PAYAL BANSAL AND ANITA KOCHHAR See end of the paper for ABSTRACT : Protein energy malnutrition is the major concern of nutrition. Malnutrition is an underlying cause authors’ affiliation of death of 2.6 million children each year – one-third of the global total of children’s deaths. Partially defatted Correspondence to : peanut flour, is a protein-rich, inexpensive and underutilized product that offers the same health and dietary benefits PAYAL BANSAL of peanut with less fat and can be utilized for making value added products to eradicate malnutrition among children. Department of Food and Nutrition, Punjab Agricultural It was prepared by crushing roasted peanuts to extract oil and then grinding the left over meal into flour. Partially University, LUDHIANA defatted peanut flour was blended with cereals and pulses for making five value added products and were evaluated (PUNJAB) INDIA for sensory quality by using nine point hedonic scale and nutritional composition by using standard methods. The Email: bansal.payal19@gmail. acceptable percentage of peanut flour was 5% for soup, 10% for pancake, kheer and 30% for vadiya and papad. com Overall acceptability score was 7.2, 8.14, 8.51, 8.12 and 8.4. The developed products were found to be highly nutritious as soup gives 336.39 Kcal of energy, 14.53% protein, 692.73 mg calcium and 9.15 mg of iron. Pancake gives 458.53 Kcal of energy, 22.75% of protein, calcium 56.00 mg and iron 4.84 mg per100g.
    [Show full text]
  • TOTAL FOLATE in PEANUTS and PEANUT PRODUCTS by LAKSHMI
    TOTAL FOLATE IN PEANUTS AND PEANUT PRODUCTS by LAKSHMI KOTA (Under the Direction of Ronald R. Eitenmiller) ABSTRACT Samples consisting of 222 cultivar specific samples of four different peanut types (Runner, Virginia, Spanish and Valencia) from 2 years (2005 and 2006) from 3 geographical locations (Southeast, Southwest and Virginia/Carolina) were collected for the study. No significant differences were noted among the folate levels by types for 2005 crop year peanuts (P>0.05). For 2006 peanuts, Spanish peanuts were statistically lower in folate than Runner and Virginia peanuts (P<0.05). For the Runner cultivars, significant (P<0.05) differences existed among cultivars with some significant year-to-year variation. Year of harvest did not have significant effect on folate content of Virginia peanuts. Folate contents among Virginia cultivars were statistically similar in 2005 and 2006. For Spanish cultivars in 2005, OLin had significantly higher folate than Tamspan 90. Overall means for both Runner and Spanish peanut types showed that high-oleic cultivars contained significantly higher total folate levels than normal cultivars (P<0.05). Folate levels in peanuts from Virginia/Carolina region varied significantly by production year, but peanuts from Southeast and Southwest region did not vary from 2005 to 2006. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the trienzyme digestion for the extraction of total folate from peanut butter. The predicted second-order polynomial model was adequate (R 2 = 0.97) with a small coefficient of variation (3.05). Both Pronase R and conjugase had significant effects on the extraction. Ridge analysis gave an optimum trienzyme time: Pronase R, 1h; α-amylase, 1.5 h; conjugase, 1h.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulation and Evaluation of Peanut Flour Incorporated Cookies
    International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition ISSN: 2455-4898 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.14 www.foodsciencejournal.com Volume 3; Issue 5; September 2018; Page No. 56-59 Formulation and evaluation of peanut flour incorporated cookies Reena Singh1, Arivuchudar R2 1 Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India 2 Assistant professor, Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract Peanuts, largely accepted and affordable nut and oil seed, is well–known for its nutrients density. The protein, MUFA, iron and niacin are found in abundance and has various potential health benefits, including growth promotion and overpowering PCOS and infertility. The implication of value addition to the customarily celebrated snack product lies in the nutritional augmentation of a large community with great ease. Hence, this study is planned with the objective of incorporating the wellness of roasted peanut flour into the refined wheat flour and developing value added cookies, as it is a widely accepted food product by all age groups, with relatively long shelf life and convenient storage. The developed value-added cookies were subjected to nutrient evaluation and compared with the control. Keywords: value addition, peanut, roasting Introduction Objectives There is a perceptible variance in the intake design of peanut The study is framed with the following objectives: both in the developed and developing countries. Most of the a) To develop the peanut flour from roasted peanut. peanut produced in the developing countries is exhausted for b) To formulate cookies by incorporating peanut flour in oil extraction required to meet the domestic needs, while in various proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • Peanut As a Source of Protein for Human Foods
    PlantFoodsfor Human Nutrition 41: 165-177, 1991. '' " *i 165 © 1991 Kluwer Academic Pablishers. Printe4 in the Netherlands. Peanut as a source of protein for human foods B. SINGH & U. SINGH' Department of Food Science, Alabama A & Al University. Normal, AL 35762, USA ('present address. International Crops Research Institutefor Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Patancherv,A.P., India) Received 25 August 1990; accepted with minor revisions I November 1990 Key words: peanut, peanut protein, peanut fortified foods Abstract. Peanut has traditionally been used as asource of oil; however, its worldwide annual protein harvest has reached neariy 4 5 million ton3 . India followed by China and the United States are the major producers of peanut. In recent years, several cereals and legumes-based foods using peanuts as protein supplements have been developed to alleviate protein calories­ malnutrition problem. Peanut in the form of flour, protein isolates, and meal in a nxed product have been found to be very desirable from a sensory quality point of view. Peanut protein is deficient with rcspect to certain essertial amino acids, but its true digestibility is comparabL with that of animal protein. Even though various processing methods influence the nutritional and sensory quality of peanut fortified human foods available information on these aspects have been reviewed and summarised in this paper in order to optimize the utilization of peanut protein to increase protein value of cereal-based foods in developing countries of the peanut growing regions of the world. Introduction Food crops have occupied an important place in human nutrition as they remain the major sources of calories and proteins for a large proportion of the world population, particularly, in the developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Defatted Peanut) Flour Cookies
    JOURNAL OF GRAIN PROCESSING AND STORAGE Journal homepage: www.jakraya.com/journal/jgps ORIGINAL ARTICLE Nutritional and Functional Characterization of Peanut Okara (Defatted Peanut) Flour Cookies Trushal Dharsenda 1, Mukesh Dabhi 1, M. Jethva 1 and M. Kapopara 2 1Department of Processing and Food Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, 2Bakery School, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362001, Gujarat, India. Abstract Peanut is the most important oil seed in the world, and rapidly becoming a valuable source of plant protein. The oil can be removed from *Corresponding Author: peanut, the protein could be concentrated from residual cakes and this cake was known as peanut okara. Peanut okara was used for the preparation of Mukesh Dabhi nutritional protein rich cookies. In this study the mixing ratios of refined wheat flour and peanut okara flour were 100:00 (Control), 90:10 Email: [email protected] (Treatment T1), 80:20 (Treatment T2), 70:30 (Treatment T3), 60:40 (Treatment T4), 50:50 (Treatment T5) respectively. The nutritional characteristics in terms of moisture content, protein, total ash, fat content Received: 03/12/2015 and carbohydrates of cookies were increase with increases peanut okara Revised: 24/12/2015 flour with refined wheat flour. The functional properties i.e. Water Absorption Index and Water Solubility Index of cookies were increase with Accepted: 29/12/2015 increases proportion of peanut okara flour. Cookies versatility, long shelf life, availability in numerous shapes and sizes, high digestibility, good nutrition, and relatively low cost are attractive to the consumer. Keywords: Cookies, Nutritional Characteristics, Functional Characteristics, Peanut Okara, Defatted Peanut. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • OPTIMIZATION and ACCEPTABILITY of MEATLESS CHICKEN NUGGET ANALOGS PREPARED from TEXTURED PEANUT by YONG, YEE SHYEN Bachelor Of
    OPTIMIZATION AND ACCEPTABILITY OF MEATLESS CHICKEN NUGGET ANALOGS PREPARED FROM TEXTURED PEANUT By YONG, YEE SHYEN Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2003 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2006 OPTIMIZATION AND ACCEPTABILITY OF MEATLESS CHICKEN NUGGET ANALOGS PREPARED FROM TEXTURED PEANUT Thesis Approved: Dr. Margaret J. Hinds Thesis Adviser Dr. Carla Goad Dr. Christina DeWitt Dr. William McGlynn Dr. A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page is dedicated to everyone who has somehow laid a print in my life both directly involved in this research and those who stand by the sidelines cheering me on towards the end. First of all, thank you God for bringing me to form and giving me talents that are limited only by my own imagination. Dr. Margaret Hinds, thank you for your generous support, optimistic attitude, constructive guidance, and undying understanding. My committee members: Dr. Christina DeWitt, Dr. Carla Goad and Dr. William McGlynn for their expertise and suggestion that helped me improve this research. Thank you Mum and Dad for your sacrifices to put me through college. My sister, aunts and Kenneth for being the cheerleading squad. David Moe, Darren Scott, Renee Albers-Nelson, Joan Summer and employees of the Food and Ag Products Research and Technology Center for guidance and valuable inputs. Also a note of appreciation to all my colleagues: Shamira Fernandes, Dharmendra Bangalore and Fadi Al Jorf for their friendships and the wonderful memories.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation of Protein from Defatted Peanut Meal and Characterize Their Nutritional Profile
    Chemistry Research Journal, 2018, 3(2):187-196 Available online www.chemrj.org ISSN: 2455-8990 Research Article CODEN(USA): CRJHA5 Isolation of Protein from Defatted Peanut Meal and Characterize their Nutritional Profile Md. S Uddin1, Md A Islam1, Mohammad M Rahman2, M. B Uddin1, Md. Anisur R Mazumder1* 1Department of Food Technology and Rural Industries, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh 2Department of Family Planning, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, People’s Republic of Bangladesh Abstract Peanut contains high amount of protein (26%) and protein content increased in the groundnut meal after extraction of oil from it. The proximate analysis defatted peanut meal indicated that it contains 47–55% high quality protein. Peanut protein was isolated from defatted peanut meal by alkaline isoelectric precipitation and physical separation procedures. Peanut protein isolates had a solubility profile similar to that of peanut flour, with minimum solubility observed at pH 3.5–4.5 and maximum solubility at pH 10 and higher. Roasting of peanut reduced all functional properties of defatted peanut flour. Results suggested that peanut protein isolates could be used in food formulations, but would not be suitable for applications requiring high water retention and foaming capacity. It could be a good source of protein fortification for a variety of food products for protein deficient consumers in developing countries as well as a functional ingredient for the peanut industry. The production of peanut protein isolates could also add value to defatted peanut flour, a low value by-product of peanut oil production. Keywords peanut, protein, isolation, solubility, nutrition 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SPEC Partially Defatted Peanut Flour
    SPECIALTY PRODUCTS PARTIALLY DEFATTED PEANUT FLOUR – 12% FAT Product Code 521261 – Dark Roast DESCRIPTION: Partially Defatted Peanut Flour is made from high oleic raw peanuts, which have been cleaned, blanched, and electronically sorted to select the highest quality peanuts. The nuts are then roasted and processed through a natural process to obtain a peanut flour with a controlled fat content. Peanut flour is gluten-free. High oleic peanuts are much more stable than traditional peanuts resulting in a more stable peanut flour. FLAVOR: Strong roasted peanut flavor SUGGESTED APPLICATIONS: Confections Seasoning Blends Pet Treats Dry Peanut Butter Baked Goods Nutritional Bars Dry Flavors Smoothies INGREDIENT DECLARATION: Peanuts – 100% LABEL DECLARATION: Peanut Flour, Defatted Peanut Flour, Peanuts, Roasted Peanuts, Roasted Peanut Flour, Defatted Peanuts TYPICAL ANALYSIS: Protein (N x 5.46) 50% ± 2% Standard plate count < 5,000 / G Fat 12% ± 2% Yeast & Mold < 200 / G Moisture < 2.5% Coliform < 100 MPN / G Dietary Fiber (total) 16% ± 2% E. Coli < 3 MPN / G Ash 4% ± 2% E. Coli O157:H7 Negative Carbohydrate 33% ± 2% Salmonella Negative Color (Hunter colorimeter – L scale) 61 ± 3 L. Monocytogenes Negative Density 21 - 23 lbs. / CFT PACKAGING: 50 lb. (22.7 kg.) multi-wall paper - poly lined bags - 40 bags/pallet SAMPLE SIZE: 1 lb. KOSHER: OU HALAL: I.S.A. STORAGE CONDITIONS: Cool / Dry SHELF LIFE: 24 months when stored in original packaging. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: Product of USA This information contained herein is correct to the best of our knowledge. The recommendations or suggestions contained in this bulletin are made without guarantee or representation as to results.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional Facts Landies Candies
    NUTRITIONAL FACTS LANDIES CANDIES Landies Candies Pretzel Munch Tree Box Nutritional Facts Milk Chocolate White Cookies Milk Chocolate Serving Size: 1.5 oz (42g) Peanut Butter & Cream Butterfinger Pretzel Munch Pretzel Munch Pretzel Munch Serving Size Per Package: 2 % % % Amt. Per Daily Amt. Per Daily Amt. Per Daily Serving Value Serving Value Serving Value Calories 210 210 200 Calories from Fat 90 80 80 Total Fat 10g 15% 8g 12% 9g 14% Saturated Fat 6g 30% 7g 35% 5g 25% Trans Fat 0g 0g 0g Cholesterol <5mg 2% 0mg 0% <5mg 2% Sodium 85mg 4% 110mg 4% 80mg 3% Total Carbohydrate 27g 9% 30g 10% 27g 9% Dietary Fiber 1g 4% 1g 4% 1g 4% Sugar 16g 19g 16g Protein 3g 2g 3g Vitamin A 2% 0% 0% Vitamin C 0% 0% 0% Calcium 6% 0% 6% Iron 6% 4% 6% Percent Daily Value are based on a 2,000 calorie diet. Your Daily values may be higher or lower depending on your calorie needs. MILK CHOCOLATE PEANUT BUTTER PRETZEL MUNCH (Net Wt. 3oz.) Ingredients: Milk Chocolate (Sugar, Milk, Cocoa Butter, Chocolate Liquor, Soy Lecithin [an emulsifier], Vanilla), Pretzel (Enriched Flour [Wheat Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid], Water, Canola Oil, Salt, Malt, Yeast, Baking Soda), Peanut Butter Chips (Sugar, Partially Hydrogenated Palm Kernel 0il, Partially Defatted Peanut Flour, Nonfat Milk Powder, Whey Powder, Peanut Butter [Peanuts, Hydrogenated Rapeseed and Cotton Oil], Dextrose, Salt and Soy Lecithin [an emulsifier]), Peanuts (Roasted in Peanut Oil and Salted), White Drizzle (Sugar, Palm Kernel Oil and Partially Hydrogenated Palm Kernel Oil, Reduced Mineral Whey Powder, Whole Milk, Natural Dry Milk, Soy Lecithin [an emulsifier], Salt, Vanillin [an artificial flavor]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Outlook for Processing Peanut Meal Into Edible Products in Georgia
    t • THE OUTLOOK FOR PROCESSING PEANUT MEAL INTO EDIBLE PRODUCTS IN GEORGIA by Tze I. Chiang ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION Industrial Development Division Georgia Institute of Technology Project E-400-902 THE OUTLOOK FOR PROCESSING PEANUT MEAL INTO EDIBLE PROTEIN PRODUCTS IN GEORGIA by Tze I. Chiang ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION Industrial Development Division Georgia Institute of Technology June 1973 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgments Summary ii INTRODUCTION 1 WHY CONSIDER PROCESSING PEANUT MEAL FOR EDIBLE PROTEIN PRODUCTS IN GEORGIA? 2 THE MARKET POTENTIALS OF EDIBLE PEANUT PROTEIN PRODUCTS 5 Peanut Proteins and Soy Proteins 5 End Uses and Market Potentials 7 Current Sales of Peanut Protein Products 12 PROCESSING PEANUT PROTEIN PRODUCTS 13 Source Materials and Sanitary Requirements 13 Production Processes 14 A Milling Unit within a Peanut Crushing Plant 18 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT NEEDS 19 REFERENCES 21 Tables 1. Analysis of Peanut Flour and Soy Flour 6 2. Comparison of Essential Amino Acid Levels in FAO Reference Protein and Proteins of Peanut, Soybean, and Skim Milk 7 3. Estimated U. S. Production of Soy Protein Foods, 1970 9 4. Projected Impact of Soy Protein Substitution in Pounds of Meat, Kind, and Estimated Percent of Meat Replaced in the United States, 1980 11 Acknowledgments The author wishes to express his appreciation to all persons who have of- fered their time and information to help make this report possible. Although it is impossible to list all, credit to major sources is given below: Mr. Ron Balkcom of the Georgia Agricultural Commodity Commission for Pea- nuts, Tifton, Georgia, has been actively promoting the uses and processing of peanut protein products.
    [Show full text]
  • Ingredient Statement Frozen Yogurt
    Ingredient Statement Frozen Yogurt NONTART FROZEN YOGURT (nonfat milk, sugar, nonfat yogurt [pasteurized nonfat milk, starch, live and active cultures] or [pasteurized nonfat milk, pectin, live and active cultures], nonfat yogurt powder [nonfat milk, culture], dextrose, carrageenan, guar gum, maltodextrin, mono- and diglycerides, rice starch), CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES (unbleached enriched flour [wheat flour, Chocolate Chip Cookie Frozen Yogurt niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mononitrate [vitamin B1], riboflavin [vitamin B2], folic acid], semisweet chocolate chips [sugar, chocolate, cocoa butter, dextrose, soy lecithin], sugar, soybean oil, partially hydrogenated cottonseed oil, high fructose corn syrup, leavening [baking soda, ammonium phosphate], salt, whey [from milk], natural and artificial flavor, caramel color) NONTART FROZEN YOGURT (nonfat milk, sugar, nonfat yogurt [pasteurized nonfat milk, starch, live and active cultures] or [pasteurized nonfat milk, pectin, live and active cultures], nonfat yogurt powder [nonfat milk, culture], dextrose, carrageenan, guar Chocolate Hazelnut Frozen Yogurt gum, maltodextrin, mono- and diglycerides, rice starch), CHOCOLATE HAZELNUT (sugar, palm oil, hazelnuts, cocoa, skim milk, reduced mineral whey [milk], soy lecithin [emulsifier], vanillin [artificial flavor]) NONTART FROZEN YOGURT (nonfat milk, sugar, nonfat yogurt [pasteurized nonfat milk, starch, live and active cultures] or [pasteurized nonfat milk, pectin, live and active cultures], nonfat yogurt powder [nonfat milk, culture], dextrose, carrageenan,
    [Show full text]