Sequential Simulations of Mixed Discrete-Continuous Properties: Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sequential Simulations of Mixed Discrete-Continuous Properties: Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation Sequential Simulations of Mixed Discrete-Continuous Properties: Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji, Laura Dovera, and Ernesto Della Rossa Abstract We present here a method for generating realizations of the posterior probability density function of a Gaussian Mixture linear inverse problem in the combined discrete-continuous case. This task is achieved by extending the sequen- tial simulations method to the mixed discrete-continuous problem. The sequential approach allows us to generate a Gaussian Mixture random field that honors the covariance functions of the continuous property and the available observed data. The traditional inverse theory results, well known for the Gaussian case, are first summarized for Gaussian Mixture models: in particular the analytical expression for means, covariance matrices, and weights of the conditional probability density function are derived. However, the computation of the weights of the conditional distribution requires the evaluation of the probability density function values of a multivariate Gaussian distribution, at each conditioning point. As an alternative so- lution of the Bayesian inverse Gaussian Mixture problem, we then introduce the sequential approach to inverse problems and extend it to the Gaussian Mixture case. The Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation (SGMixSim) approach is presented as a particular case of the linear inverse Gaussian Mixture problem, where the linear operator is the identity. Similar to the Gaussian case, in Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation the means and the covariance matrices of the conditional distribution at a given point correspond to the kriging estimate, component by component, of the mixture. Furthermore, Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation can be conditioned by secondary information to account for non-stationarity. Examples of applications D. Grana () · T. Mukerji Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA e-mail: [email protected] T. Mukerji e-mail: [email protected] L. Dovera · E. Della Rossa Eni E&P, Via Emilia 1, Milan 20097, Italy L. Dovera e-mail: [email protected] E. Della Rossa e-mail: [email protected] P. Abrahamsen et al. (eds.), Geostatistics Oslo 2012, 239 Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics 17, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4153-9_19, © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 240 D. Grana et al. with synthetic and real data, are presented in the reservoir modeling domain where realizations of facies distribution and reservoir properties, such as porosity or net- to-gross, are obtained using Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation approach. In these examples, reservoir properties are assumed to be distributed as a Gaussian Mixture model. In particular, reservoir properties are Gaussian within each facies, and the weights of the mixture are identified with the point-wise probability of the facies. 1 Introduction Inverse problems are common in many different domains such as physics, engineer- ing, and earth sciences. In general, solving an inverse problem consists of estimating the model parameters given a set of observed data. The operator that links the model and the data can be linear or nonlinear. In the linear case, estimation techniques generally provide smoothed solutions. Kriging, for example, provides the best estimate of the model in the least-squares sense. Simple kriging is in fact identical to a linear Gaussian inverse problem where the linear operator is the identity, with the estimation of posterior mean and covari- ance matrices with direct observations of the model space. Monte Carlo methods can be applied as well to solve inverse problems [12] in a Bayesian framework to sample from the posterior; but standard sampling methodologies can be ineffi- cient in practical applications. Sequential simulations have been introduced in geo- statistics to generate high resolution models and provide a number of realizations of the posterior probability function honoring both prior information and the observed values. References [3] and [6] give detailed descriptions of kriging and sequential simulation methods. Reference [8] proposes a methodology that applies sequential simulations to linear Gaussian inverse problems to incorporate the prior information on the model and honor the observed data. We propose here to extend the approach of [8] to the Gaussian Mixture case. Gaussian Mixture models are convex combinations of Gaussian components that can be used to describe the multi-modal behavior of the model and the data. Ref- erence [14], for instance, introduces Gaussian Mixture distributions in multivariate nonlinear regression modeling; while [10] proposes a mixture discriminant analy- sis as an extension of linear discriminant analysis by using Gaussian Mixtures and Expectation-Maximization algorithm [11]. Gaussian Mixture models are common in statistics (see, for example, [9] and [2]) and they have been used in different do- mains: digital signal processing [13] and [5], engineering [1], geophysics [7], and reservoir history matching [4]. In this paper we first present the extension of the traditional results valid in the Gaussian case to the Gaussian Mixture case; we then propose the sequential ap- proach to linear inverse problems under the assumption of Gaussian Mixture distri- bution; and we finally show some examples of applications in reservoir modeling. If the linear operator is the identity, then the methodology provides an extension of the traditional Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGSim, see [3], and [6])toanew Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation 241 methodology that we call Sequential Gaussian Mixture Simulation (SGMixSim). The applications we propose refer to mixed discrete-continuous problems of reser- voir modeling and they provide, as main result, sets of models of reservoir facies and porosity. The key point of the application is that we identify the weights of the Gaussian Mixture describing the continuous random variable (porosity) with the probability of the reservoir facies (discrete variable). 2 Theory: Linearized Gaussian Mixture Inversion In this section we provide the main propositions of linear inverse problems with Gaussian Mixtures (GMs). We first recap the well-known analytical result for pos- terior distributions of linear inverse problems with Gaussian prior; then we extend the result to the Gaussian Mixtures case. In the Gaussian case, the solution of the linear inverse problem is well-known ∼ [15]. If m is a random vector Gaussian distributed, m N(μm, Cm), with mean μm and covariance Cm; and G is a linear operator that transforms the model m into the observable data d d = Gm + ε, (1) where ε is a random vector that represents an error with Gaussian distribution N(0, Cε) independent of the model m; then the posterior conditional distribution of m|d is Gaussian with mean and covariance given by = + T T + −1 − μm|d μm CmG GCmG Cε (d Gμm) (2) T T −1 Cm|d = Cm − CmG GCmG + Cε GCm. (3) This result is based on two well known properties of the Gaussian distributions: (A) the linear transform of a Gaussian distribution is again Gaussian; (B) if the joint distribution (m, d) is Gaussian, then the conditional distribution m|d is again Gaus- sian. These two properties can be extended to the Gaussian Mixtures case. We as- sume that x is a random vector distributed according to a Gaussian Mixture with = Nc ; k k Nc components, f(x) k=1 πkN(x μx, Cx), where πk are the weights and the ; k k k distributions N(x μx, Cx) represent the Gaussian components with means μx and k covariances Cx evaluated in x. By applying property (A) to the Gaussian compo- nents of the mixture, we can conclude that, if L is a linear operator, then y = Lx is distributed according to a Gaussian Mixture. Moreover, the pdf of y is given by = Nc ; k k T f(y) k=1 πkN(y Lμx, LCxL ). Similarly we can extend property (B) to conditional Gaussian Mixture distribu- tions. The well-known result of the conditional multivariate Gaussian distribution has already been extended to multivariate Gaussian Mixture models (see, for exam- 242 D. Grana et al. ple, [1]). In particular, if (x1, x2) is a random vector whose joint distribution is a Gaussian Mixture Nc f(x1, x2) = πkfk(x1, x2), (4) k=1 where fk are the Gaussian densities, then the conditional distribution of x2|x1 is again a Gaussian Mixture Nc f(x2|x1) = λkfk(x2|x1), (5) k=1 and its parameters (weights, means, and covariance matrices) can be analytically derived. The coefficients λk are given by πkfk(x1) λk = , (6) Nc =1 πf(x1) where f (x ) = N(x ; μk , Ck ); and the means and the covariance matrices are k 1 1 x1 x1 − μk = μk + Ck Ck 1 x − μk (7) x2|x1 x2 x2,x1 x1 1 x1 − Ck = Ck − Ck Ck 1 Ck T , (8) x2|x1 x2 x2,x1 x1 x2,x1 where Ck is the cross-covariance matrix. By combining these propositions, the x2,x1 main result of linear inverse problems with Gaussian Mixture can be derived. Theorem 1 Let m be a random vector distributed according to a Gaussian Mixture ∼ Nc k k k m k=1 πkN(μm, Cm), with Nc components and with means μm, covariances k = :M →N Cm, and weights πk, for k 1,...,Nc. Let G be a linear operator, and ε a Gaussian random vector independent of m with 0 mean and covariance Cε, such that d = Gm + ε, with d ∈N , m ∈M , ε ∈N , then the posterior conditional distribution m|d is a Gaussian Mixture. Moreover, the posterior means and covariances of the components are given by k = k + k T k T + −1 − k μm|d μm CmG GCmG Cε d Gμm (9) k = k − k T k T + −1 k Cm|d Cm CmG GCmG Cε GCm, (10) k k th where μm and Cm, are respectively the prior mean and covariance of the k Gaus- sian component of m. The posterior coefficients λk of the mixture are given by πkfk(d) λk = , (11) Nc =1 πf(d) k = k k = where the Gaussian densities fk(d) have means μd Gμm and covariances Cd k T + GCmG Cε.
Recommended publications
  • Seismic Reflection Inversion with Basis Pursuit
    Seismic sparse-layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit decomposition Rui Zhang and John Castagna 4800 Calhoun Rd, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston Houston, TX, 77204 ABSTRACT Basis pursuit inversion of seismic reflection data for reflection coefficients is introduced as an alternative method of incorporating a priori information in a seismic inversion process. The inversion is accomplished by building a dictionary of functions, representing seismic reflection responses, and constituting the seismic trace as a superposition of these responses. Basis pursuit decomposition finds a sparse number of reflection responses that sum to form the seismic trace. When the dictionary of functions is chosen to be a wedge model of reflection coefficient pairs convolved with the seismic wavelet, the resulting reflectivity inversion is a sparse-layer inversion, rather than a sparse-spike inversion. Synthetic tests show that sparse-layer inversion using basis pursuit can better resolve thin beds than a comparable sparse-spike inversion can. Application to field data indicates that sparse-layer inversion results in potentially improved detectability and resolution of some thin layers and reveals apparent stratigraphic features that are not readily seen on conventional seismic sections. INTRODUCTION In conventional seismic deconvolution, the seismogram is convolved with a wavelet inverse filter to yield band limited reflectivity. The output reflectivity is band- limited to the original frequency band of the data so as to avoid blowing up noise at frequencies with little or no signal. It has long been established (e.g., Riel and Berkhout; 1985) that sparse seismic inversion methods can produce output reflectivity solutions that contain frequencies that are not contained in the original signal without necessarily magnifying noise at those frequencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Research Support and Anti-Plagiarism Services and Training
    CleanScript Group – best research support and anti-plagiarism services and training List of oil field acronyms The oil and gas industry uses many jargons, acronyms and abbreviations. Obviously, this list is not anywhere near exhaustive or definitive, but this should be the most comprehensive list anywhere. Mostly coming from user contributions, it is contextual and is meant for indicative purposes only. It should not be relied upon for anything but general information. # 2D - Two dimensional (geophysics) 2P - Proved and Probable Reserves 3C - Three components seismic acquisition (x,y and z) 3D - Three dimensional (geophysics) 3DATW - 3 Dimension All The Way 3P - Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves 4D - Multiple Three dimensional's overlapping each other (geophysics) 7P - Prior Preparation and Precaution Prevents Piss Poor Performance, also Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance A A&D - Acquisition & Divestment AADE - American Association of Drilling Engineers [1] AAPG - American Association of Petroleum Geologists[2] AAODC - American Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors (obsolete; superseded by IADC) AAR - After Action Review (What went right/wrong, dif next time) AAV - Annulus Access Valve ABAN - Abandonment, (also as AB) ABCM - Activity Based Costing Model AbEx - Abandonment Expense ACHE - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger ACOU - Acoustic ACQ - Annual Contract Quantity (in reference to gas sales) ACQU - Acquisition Log ACV - Approved/Authorized Contract Value AD - Assistant Driller ADE - Asphaltene
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Stress and Strain Field in the Tyra Field During the Post-Chalk Deposition and Seismic Inversion of Fault Zone Using Informed-Proposal Monte Carlo
    Stress and strain during the Post-Chalk Deposition Evolution of the Stress and Strain field in the Tyra field during the Post-Chalk Deposition and Seismic Inversion of fault zone using Informed-Proposal Monte Carlo Sarouyeh Khoshkholgh, Ivanka Orozova-Bekkevold and Klaus Mosegaard Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen September, 2021 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....2 Well Data………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Modelling of the Post-Chalk overburden in the Tyra field………………………………………………………5 Numerical representation of the Post-Chalk Deposition in the Tyra field………………………………………..6 Finite elements modelling of the Post-Chalk Deposition in the Tyra field………………………………………..9 Results: Evolution of the Stress and Strain state in the Tyra Field during the Cenozoic Deposition…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………12 Seismic Study of the Fault Detection Limit……………………………………………………………………………13 Seimic Inversion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….14 Results: Seismic Inversion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Conclusions and Discussions……………………………………………………………………………………….…..…..22 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..23 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..24 Abstract When hydrocarbon reservoirs are used as a CO2 storage facility, an accurate uncertainty analysis and risk assessment is essential. An integration of information from geological knowledge, geological modelling, well log data, and geophysical data provides
    [Show full text]
  • CONVENTIONAL OIL and GAS EXPLORATION Improving Cost Control and Efficiencies to Meet Today’S Exploration Challenges Table of Contents
    CONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION Improving cost control and efficiencies to meet today’s exploration challenges Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 Exploration impact of downturn ................................................................................... 1 Signs of recovery ............................................................................................................. 1 Exploration challenges ahead ...................................................................................... 2 REVISTING MATURE BASINS TO UNLOCK POTENTIAL ..................................................... 3 SOFTWARE TO OPTIMISE MATURE BASIN EXPLORATION ............................................... 4 FRONTIER AND UNDER-EXPLORED BASINS ....................................................................... 5 Reducing uncertainty and increasing chances of success ...................................... 6 SOFTWARE TO ENHANCE FRONTIER AND UNDER-EXPLORED BASIN EXPLORATION ... 7 MEETING DEEPWATER CHALLENGES ............................................................................... 8 Geopressure models for well planning ......................................................................... 8 UNDERSTANDING AND MINIMISING RISK IN HIGH PRESSURE AND HIGH TEMPERATURE ENVIRONMENTS ....................................................................................... 9 Improving prediction accuracy ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Flow–Seismic Inversion for Characterizing Fractured Reservoirs
    Joint flow–seismic inversion for characterizing fractured reservoirs: theoretical approach and numer- ical modeling Peter K. Kang⇤, Yingcai Zheng, Xinding Fang, Rafal Wojcik, Dennis McLaughlin, Stephen Brown, Michael C. Fehler, Daniel R. Burns and Ruben Juanes, Massachusetts Institute of Technology SUMMARY ments into the seismic interpretation; on the other, improve the predictability of reservoir models by making joint use of seis- Traditionally, seismic interpretation is performed without any mic and flow data. account of the flow behavior. Here, we present a methodol- ogy to characterize fractured geologic media by integrating The basic tenet of our proposed framework is that there is a flow and seismic data. The key element of the proposed ap- strong dependence between fracture permeability (which drives proach is the identification of the intimate relation between the flow response) and fracture compliance (which drives the acoustic and flow responses of a fractured reservoir through seismic response). This connection has long been recognized the fracture compliance. By means of synthetic models, we (Pyrak-Nolte and Morris, 2000; Brown and Fang, 2012), and show that: (1) owing to the strong (but highly uncertain) de- recent works have pointed to the potential of exploiting that pendence of fracture permeability on fracture compliance, the connection (Vlastos et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2009). Here, modeled flow response in a fractured reservoir is highly sensi- we propose a formal approach to improved characterization of tive to the geophysical interpretation; and (2) by incorporating fractured reservoirs, and improved reservoir flow predictions, flow data (well pressures and production curves) into the inver- by making joint use of the seismic and flow response.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt22q7c2vf Nosplash 4A67ffc49
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Development of Specialized Nonlinear Inversion Algorithms, Basis Functions, Eikonal Solvers, and Their Integration for Use in Joint Seismic and Gravitational Tomographic Inversion A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Geophysics and Space Physics by Zagid Abatchev 2019 c Copyright by Zagid Abatchev 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Development of Specialized Nonlinear Inversion Algorithms, Basis Functions, Eikonal Solvers, and Their Integration for Use in Joint Seismic and Gravitational Tomographic Inversion by Zagid Abatchev Doctor of Philosophy in Geophysics and Space Physics University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Paul M. Davis, Chair 1 Abstract Many approaches and packages have been developed for tomographic inversion of seis- mic data and have consistently remained in high demand in both academic and industrial geophysics for subsurface imaging. However, our survey of published implementations has shown them to suffer from shortcomings. They include: low computational efficiency lead- ing to overreliance on gradient-based inversion methods, non-robust forward models, and overparametrization of invertible fields leading to overconfidence in parameter resolvability and susceptibility to local minima. Additionally, many suffer from poor algorithmic docu- mentation, lacking source code availability, and complicated dependencies of many published packages, resulting in difficulty with their reproducibility, testing, and adaptation. Finally, most available packages do not incorporate different measurement sets, such as gravitational anomaly data, to better constrain seismic inversion. To address these issues, we have developed our own implementation and integration of an improved set of algorithms for seismic and gravitational tomography and applied it to ii a seismic data set from the Peruvian Andes obtained in a joint experiment with Caltech between 2008 and 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cinguvu Field Offshore Angola Example (SEG
    4D analysis, combining shallow hydrophone and multi-component streamer: the Cinguvu Field Offshore Angola example Cyrille Reiser*1, Bruce Webb2, Massimiliano Bertarini2, Didier Lecerf1, Vincenzo Milluzzo3, Catia Rizzetto2 1: PGS, 2: Eni, 3: Eni Angola Summary Square) of the difference and with the constrains of the dominant frequency. Efficiently and accurately estimating fluid-flow movement The dataset used in the present project (offshore Angola) is information from time-lapse data is a prime deliverable of not a true 4D seismic sensu-stricto as various differences any 4D acquisition and analysis. The key to success in this exist between the base and the repeat (‘monitor’) seismic. depends on a few factors including optimum 4D seismic The 2011 “baseline” data is a 3D shallow towed single acquisition, the seismic frequency bandwidth at the reservoir hydrophone streamer seismic, while the 2016 “monitor” data level and being able to deliver the 4D analysis or results in a (part of a larger 3D acquisition) is a deep towed multi- very rapid and efficient manner. Maximum value of 4D is component streamer seismic with almost the same azimuth derived not from the data quality alone but also from the but not the same shot pre-plot. efficiency of delivering a 4D image and analysis. The value A 4D broadband depth processing project was carried out of the 4D decreases significantly with time, as results and with the strategy of calibrating an operator-deghosted single analysis need to be delivered promptly to make an impact on hydrophone (shallow towed) with a re-datumed up-going the in-fill well program as well as on the reservoir wavefield.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Seismic Geophysical Technologies and Non
    How electromagnetics could have changed the drilling sequence creaming curve in the Barents Fibre optics in wells to record seismic - now competitive with ocean bottom nodes? Improving workflows for non- seismic data - one data set can help you better understand another Non-seismic Geophysical Technologies and Non-Conventional Seismic, London, Oct 11 2017 Special report Non-seismic Geophysical Technologies and Non-Conventional Seismic October 11 2017, London Event sponsored by: Non-seismic Geophysical Technologies and Non-Conventional Seismic Electromagnetics, well fibre optics and combining data Finding Petroleum’s London forum looked at non-seismic geophysical tech- nologies and non-conventional seismic, with a special focus on using elec- tromagnetics to reduce risk, working with well fibre optics, and combining seismic and non-seismic data This is a report from the Finding Petroleum conference “Finding Petroleum: Non-seismic Finding Petroleum’s London forum on Oc- Garth Naldrett, Chief Product Officer of Geophysical Technologies and Non-Conventional Seismic”, held in London tober 11 2017, “Non-seismic Geophysical Silixa presented the company’s technology in October 2017 Technologies and Non-Conventional Seis- to record acoustics in wells using fibre optic Event website mic,” looked at how companies can work cables, which can be used for (active) seis- Many of the videos and slides from the with electromagnetics, in-well fibre optic mic and passive seismic. In particular, it is event can be downloaded from the event seismic, and combining seismic data with useful for repeat surveys, if the fibre optic agenda page. other types of data. cable is permanently installed, and it may www.findingpetroleum.com/event/ef071.
    [Show full text]
  • An Official Publication of the Vietnam National Oil and Gas Group Vol 10 - 2017
    ENRECAP roject Enhanced research capacity to meet VIETNAM future oil and gas challenges in Vietnam PETRO Petro ietnam An Official Publication of the Vietnam National Oil and Gas Group Vol 10 - 2017 ISSN-0866-854X EXPANDING OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION AREAS PETROVIETNAM JOURNAL IS PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY VIETNAM NATIONAL OIL AND GAS GROUP ENRECA Project Enhanced research capacity to meet VIETNAM future oil and gas challenges in Vietnam PETRO Petro ietnam An Official Publication of the Vietnam National Oil and Gas Group Vol 10 - 2017 IISSN-0866-854XSSN-0866-854X EXPANDING OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION AREAS EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Dr. Nguyen Quoc Thap DEPUTY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Dr. Le Manh Hung Dr. Phan Ngoc Trung EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Dr. Hoang Ngoc Dang Dr. Nguyen Minh Dao BSc. Vu Khanh Dong Dr. Nguyen Anh Duc MSc. Tran Hung Hien MSc. Vu Van Nghiem MSc. Le Ngoc Son Eng. Le Hong Thai MSc. Nguyen Van Tuan Dr. Phan Tien Vien Dr. Tran Quoc Viet Dr. Nguyen Tien Vinh Dr. Nguyen Hoang Yen SECRETARY MSc. Le Van Khoa M.A. Nguyen Thi Viet Ha DESIGNED BY Le Hong Van MANAGEMENT Vietnam Petroleum Institute CONTACT ADDRESS Floor M2, VPI Tower, Trung Kinh street, Yen Hoa ward, Cau Giay district, Ha Noi Tel: (+84-24) 37727108 * Fax: (+84-24) 37727107 * Email: [email protected] Mobile: 0982288671 Cover photo: Cam Lam - Nha Trang. Photo: Le Khoa Publishing Licence No. 100/GP-BTTTT dated 15 April 2013 issued by Ministry of Information and Communications FOCUS FOCUS Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc: Deputy Prime Minister Trinh Dinh Dung: PETROVIETNAM TO STAND FIRM IN THE DUNG QUAT REFINERY IS THE LEVER MIDST OF DIFFICULTIES OF QUANG NGAI’S ECONOMY On 19 October 2017, eporting to the Deputy capacity (106 - 108% on average).
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning for Fast Simulation of Seismic Waves in Complex Media
    Deep learning for fast simulation of seismic waves in complex media Ben Moseley1, Tarje Nissen-Meyer2, and Andrew Markham1 1Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, UK 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, UK Correspondence: Ben Moseley ([email protected]) Abstract. The simulation of seismic waves is a core task in many geophysical applications. Numerical methods such as Finite Difference (FD) modelling and Spectral Element Methods (SEM) are the most popular techniques for simulating seismic waves, but disadvantages such as their computational cost prohibit their use for many tasks. In this work we investigate the potential of deep learning for aiding seismic simulation in the Solid Earth sciences. We present two deep neural networks which 5 are able to simulate the seismic response at multiple locations in horizontally layered and faulted 2D acoustic media an order of magnitude faster than traditional finite difference modelling. The first network is able to simulate the seismic response in horizontally layered media and uses a WaveNet network architecture design. The second network is significantly more general than the first and is able to simulate the seismic response in faulted media with arbitrary layers, fault properties and an arbitrary location of the seismic source on the surface of the media, using a conditional autoencoder design. We test the sensitivity of 10 the accuracy of both networks to different network hyperparameters, and show that the WaveNet network can be retrained to carry out fast seismic inversion in the same media. We find that are there are challenges when extending our methods to more complex, elastic and 3D Earth models; for example the accuracy of both networks reduces when they are tested on models outside of their training distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seismic Reflection Inverse Problem
    Inverse Problems TOPICAL REVIEW Related content - A comparison of seismic velocity inversion The seismic reflection inverse problem methods for layered acoustics - A mathematical framework for inverse To cite this article: W W Symes 2009 Inverse Problems 25 123008 wave problems in heterogeneous media - A method for inverse scattering based on the generalized Bremmer coupling series View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - On quasi-seismic wave propagation in highly anisotropic triclinic layer between distinct semi-infinite triclinic geomedia Pato Kumari and Neha - Reduced Order Model Approach to Inverse Scattering Liliana Borcea et al - Seismic wavefield redatuming with regularized multi-dimensional deconvolution Nick Luiken and Tristan van Leeuwen This content was downloaded from IP address 189.46.171.20 on 21/10/2020 at 04:11 IOP PUBLISHING INVERSE PROBLEMS Inverse Problems 25 (2009) 123008 (39pp) doi:10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123008 TOPICAL REVIEW The seismic reflection inverse problem W W Symes Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University, MS 134, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA E-mail: [email protected] Received 3 July 2009, in final form 2 September 2009 Published 1 December 2009 Online at stacks.iop.org/IP/25/123008 Abstract The seismic reflection method seeks to extract maps of the Earth’s sedimentary crust from transient near-surface recording of echoes, stimulated by explosions or other controlled sound sources positioned near the surface. Reasonably accurate models of seismic energy propagation take the form of hyperbolic systems of partial differential equations, in which the coefficients represent the spatial distribution of various mechanical characteristics of rock (density, stiffness, etc).
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Reservoir Fluid Volumes Through 4 D Seismic Analysis On
    - 'JsTo'-r - W>v mTRmmN op w-oocuwar is 'u%mm FORBGN SALES PRGHHISO 7180 THE 7th CONFERENCE ON RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT The New Petroleum Age Clarion Admiral Hotel Bergen 18th- 19 th November 1998 RECEIVED JAN 1 1 2008 OSTI ESTIMATION OF RESERVOIR KLVI1) N OLI MES THROl GH 4 D SEISMIC ANALYSIS ON Gl LLFAKS Presented by: Helene H. Veire Schlumberger Geco-Prakla DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Estimation of reservoir fluid volumes through 4D seismic analysis on Gullfaks. H.H. Veire, S B. Reymond, C. Signer, P.O. Tennebp, L. Spnneland, Schlumberger Geco-Prakla. Introduction Reservoir management today is a science of approximation when it comes to the rate anddirection of fluid front movement. Optimal management requires up to date information throughout the entire reservoir volume. Ac­ cess to the latest data on fluid distribution in a reservoir, and knowledge of how the distribution is changing with time, allows engineers to develop cost-effective strategies to get the most out of every field at the lowest possible risk. In addition to static, or one-time measurements, time-dependent measurements from various oilfield disciplines help constrain, refine and improve the accuracy of reservoir models. Time-lapse logging of fluid saturation through casing can show which zones are contributing to production and which are watering out or being by­ passed. Permanent downhole sensors provide continual observations of pressure, temperature and other diag­ nostics of reservoir performance. These measurements supply crucial information about fluid behavior at the well location, but fail in the vast interwell region.
    [Show full text]