Records of Atherix Ibis in Finland (Diptera, Athericidae) Juhani Itiimies, Kalevi Kuusela & Pekka Riiinii

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Records of Atherix Ibis in Finland (Diptera, Athericidae) Juhani Itiimies, Kalevi Kuusela & Pekka Riiinii © Entomologica Fennica. 17.VIII. I990 Records of Atherix ibis in Finland (Diptera, Athericidae) juhani Itiimies, Kalevi Kuusela & Pekka Riiinii Wimies, J. , Kuusela, K. & Raina, P. 1990: Records of Atherix ibis in Finland (Diptera, Athericidae). - Entomol. Fennica I: 11 3- 117. Eight clusters of mummified females of Atherix ibis (Fabricius) were found on 6.IX. l 988 under a bridge over the Kouvanjoki River, PP: Pudasjarv i, northern Finland. Inspection of 120 bridges during the winter yielded 17 new finds. A distribution map complemented with records from museums indicates that the distribution in Finland is northern. Features of the clusters and characters of the larval stage are described and discussed. The larval development seems to last two years. Department ofZoology, University ofOu/u, SF-90570 Oulu, Finland A characteristic feature of the Ibis-fly (Atherix The distribution of Atherix ibis is palearctic, ibis (Fabri cius)) is the egg-laying behaviour of the extending from Japan through Siberia and the females, which become glued with their eggs in whole of Europe and up to the northern tundra large clu sters of up to several thousand flies (e.g. zone (Thomas 1978). The information on its oc­ Straffen 19 15 , Lindner 1925,Coyler 195 l).Straf­ currence in Finland is poor: one male was re­ fen ( 19 15) describes the phenomenon as fo llows: corded in Utsjoki in 1949 (Frey 1950) and some " In May- June the females can be fo und on larval finds were reported in a thesis (Kauppinen branches hanging over water. They lay their egg­ 1978) and stencilled student courses of the Uni­ masses at a certai n point, die and remain hanging versity of Oulu (edited by Tapani Valtonen and on the branch. More and more females become Kalevi Kuusela). Hackman ( 1985) reports that the glued to them, so that finall y a large crowd is left species li ves on river banks in Lapland. The pres­ suspended on the branch, which from some dis­ ent situation is summarized in this paper, for tance looks li ke a swarm of bees. The larv ae which the collections of Finnish entomological develop by first eating the remains of their moth­ museums have also been checked. In additi on ers and later drop into the water." In their Io ti c some aspects of its ecology are treated. environment the larvae are predacious. They suck the internal ti ssues from soft-bodied aquatic in­ vertebrates (e.g nymphs of the Ephemeroptera Records of female cluster and Plecoptera) (Thomas 1975, see also Hackman 1985). Pupation always occurs out of the water, on In autumn 1988 the author Raina found a con­ the adjacent river bank (Thomas 1976). spicuous occurrence of eight clusters underneath A. ibis is the only athericid species li vi ng in a timber bridge over a small rapid in the River Finland (Hackman 1980). Its re lative lbisia Kouvanjoki (PP: Pudasjarvi, Grid 27°E 73065: (formely Atherix) marginata Fabr. occurs in South 53 12. 6.9. 1988). Six of them were hanging on th e Sweden (Wahl gren 1907). These two species are downstream beam and two on the upstream beam easy to separate from each other even in the larv al of the bridge (Fig. 2). The biggest cone was I 0 em stage (see e.g. Brindle 196 1, Rozkosny & Spitzer high, with a di ameter of 7 em at its base. A small er 3 1965). cluster (7.5 em x 5.5 em = ca. 67 cm ) was taken 114 Itiimies eta/.: Atherix ibis in Finland • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 1 20 After our first find in Pudasjarvi, we (and some of our colleagues) inspected 11 9 bridges during the winter and spring of 1989. These yielded 17 new records, all made north of the Oulujo ki River (Fig. 1) . We also checked four bridges on highway 4 from Pithipudas northwards and 43 bridges in the area SE and E of the town of Kajaani, but without finding any signs of clusters of A. ibis. It seems probable that it does not occur in Central Finland or in Central and Southern Ostrobothnia, either, since it has not been listed in any of the numerous macroinvertebrate investiga­ tions made on rivers there. Judging from the present-day records, A. ibis seems to have a north­ ern di stribution in Fi nl and , but it occurs in Soviet Karelia, an area corresponding to the southern­ most latitudes of Finland. The occurrence on the River Livojoki (PP: Pudasjarvi, Sarajarvi, 730:5 1), about 2 km down­ stream from the mouth of the Kouvanjoki, was impressive in its abundance: the total number of females in the several tens of clusters of varying size was estimated (by eye) to be at least 50 000 100 km (Fig. 3). Interestingly, we could now see that a 30° cluster may be the product of a single or several females (Fig. 3). Fig. 1. The present-day records of Atherix ibis (Fabr.) The clusters of females were found on a vari­ in Finland. Open circle: the exact site not known (only ety of bridges. The smallest had a span of 5 m and name of parish); black circle: the newest records made a height of 2 m above the water, and the biggest by the authors and their co ll eagues (see Acknow­ ledgements). (rO =the main channels of the Oulujoki, had a span of 80 m and was 6.5 m high. The K = the city Kajaani , P =the parish of Pihtipudas). material of the bridges was wood or concrete, and sometimes the clusters were even hanging from iron nuts and washers. The masses were regularl y suspended above the midstream area of the river - none of them were hanging above the river to pieces and 613 almost undamaged females bani<. The clusters were always situated at the were counted: the density was thus nine per cubic downstream or upstream edges of the bridges centimetre and the biggest cluster must have (Fig. 3), never on similar places on girders in th e contained about 1500 flies. This number is still far central part of the bridge. At a few localities below the I 0 000 in one cluster reported by Lind­ (including Kouv anjoki) there was a preference for ner (1925), but we feel that his figure may have the downstream side. been overestimated, si nce the cone mentioned by him measured only 16 em x 10 em and , according to the density calcul ated by us, should not have Phenology contained more than 5000 females. Rozkosny & Spitzer ( 1965) have found an aggregation of more The pinned specimens (1 36 exx., including some than I 000 flies. Muttkowski ( 1929) mentions that Russian-Karelian samples) in Finnish museums the depositions of nearctic Atherix variegata were collected between 20.VI. and 9.VII. Flight (Walker) may often contai n "several thousand thus occurs arou nd and slightly after midsummer. dead fli es". The flying season seems to be short and well ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. I • Itiimies eta/.: Atherix ibis in Finland 115 Fig. 2. Two clu sters of Ath­ erix ibis fem ales (Diptera, Athericidae) on 6 .1 X.1988 under the bridge over the River Kouvanjoki (Pudas­ jarvi 730:53), northern Fin­ land. Fig. 3. A series of clusters of Atherix ibis females (Diptera, Athericidae) on 5.1.1989 under the frosty bridge over the River Livo­ joki (Pudasjarvi 730:51 ), northern Finland. synchronized, which accords with the swarming and rivers may be so local in nature that wide and egg-laying behaviour. A similarly briefflight variation occurs in the developmental cycles, giv­ period, lasting no more than ten days, has been ing the impression of a long flying season. Neveu reported by Vanhara (1975) in lbisia marginata in (1976) classifies A. ibis to an upstream species. C heckoslovakia. In Central Europe, the females of A. ibis gather for egg-laying in May- June (Straffen 1915). In Size of larvae mountain areas in South France, they have been found throughout the summer (Thomas 1974). For several years Atherix ibis larvae have been T he temperature conditions in mountain streams collected in A ugust from the River Oulankajoki 11 6 ltiimies et al.: Atherix ibis in Finland • ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. l N 80 0 Kouvanjoki (n=193) 60 • Oulankajoki (n=218) 40 Fig . 4. Th e length distribu­ tion of Atherix ibis larvae collected at th e end of August (1979, -83, -86) in 20 th e River Oul ankajoki (Kuu samo) and at th e beginning of January (1989) in th e River Kouvan­ NM-t iOIDI'- CDO>O,...NM-tiO ID I'-CD O> O N ~ ..-,....,.....,.... N N N joki (Pudasjarvi) , northern LENGTH, mm Finland. (Ks: Kuusamo, Kiutaki:i ngas, 736:60), during the thus represent a group of first time hibern ated zoological field courses of the University ofOulu. larv ae. Some samples also exist from the Oulu district (PP: Oulu, Sanginjoki, 720:44). In addition, we collected kicking-net sample from the River Comments Kouvanjoki (downstream from the bridge of our original find) on 5.I.l989. The above observatio ns are not enough to prove The total length of the larv ae was measured to two-year larval development. We can be sure, the nearest 0.5 mm. The Kuusamo materi al, which however, that sexual dimorphism is not involved, had been preserved in alcohol, incl uded some because the females are onl y sli ghtly (8-11 mm shrunken specimens, whose length were trans­ vs. 8-10 mm) bigger than the males (Thomas formed to correspond to those of relaxed larv ae 1974).
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 2
    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) Diversity in a Patch of Costa Rican Cloud Forest: Why Inventory Is a Vital Science
    Zootaxa 4402 (1): 053–090 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4402.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C2FAF702-664B-4E21-B4AE-404F85210A12 Remarkable fly (Diptera) diversity in a patch of Costa Rican cloud forest: Why inventory is a vital science ART BORKENT1, BRIAN V. BROWN2, PETER H. ADLER3, DALTON DE SOUZA AMORIM4, KEVIN BARBER5, DANIEL BICKEL6, STEPHANIE BOUCHER7, SCOTT E. BROOKS8, JOHN BURGER9, Z.L. BURINGTON10, RENATO S. CAPELLARI11, DANIEL N.R. COSTA12, JEFFREY M. CUMMING8, GREG CURLER13, CARL W. DICK14, J.H. EPLER15, ERIC FISHER16, STEPHEN D. GAIMARI17, JON GELHAUS18, DAVID A. GRIMALDI19, JOHN HASH20, MARTIN HAUSER17, HEIKKI HIPPA21, SERGIO IBÁÑEZ- BERNAL22, MATHIAS JASCHHOF23, ELENA P. KAMENEVA24, PETER H. KERR17, VALERY KORNEYEV24, CHESLAVO A. KORYTKOWSKI†, GIAR-ANN KUNG2, GUNNAR MIKALSEN KVIFTE25, OWEN LONSDALE26, STEPHEN A. MARSHALL27, WAYNE N. MATHIS28, VERNER MICHELSEN29, STEFAN NAGLIS30, ALLEN L. NORRBOM31, STEVEN PAIERO27, THOMAS PAPE32, ALESSANDRE PEREIRA- COLAVITE33, MARC POLLET34, SABRINA ROCHEFORT7, ALESSANDRA RUNG17, JUSTIN B. RUNYON35, JADE SAVAGE36, VERA C. SILVA37, BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR38, JEFFREY H. SKEVINGTON8, JOHN O. STIREMAN III10, JOHN SWANN39, PEKKA VILKAMAA40, TERRY WHEELER††, TERRY WHITWORTH41, MARIA WONG2, D. MONTY WOOD8, NORMAN WOODLEY42, TIFFANY YAU27, THOMAS J. ZAVORTINK43 & MANUEL A. ZUMBADO44 †—deceased. Formerly with the Universidad de Panama ††—deceased. Formerly at McGill University, Canada 1. Research Associate, Royal British Columbia Museum and the American Museum of Natural History, 691-8th Ave. SE, Salmon Arm, BC, V1E 2C2, Canada. Email: [email protected] 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Synonymy in the Horsefly Genus Hybomitra (Diptera: Tabanidae)
    a new synonymy in the horsefly genus HYBOMITRA (diptera: tabanidae) Theo Zeegers The taxonomy and nomenclature of Hybomitra solstitialis is critically revised. Based on a re-examination of the type, H. solstitialis is found to be identical with the species currently known as H. ciureai syn. nov. Since the 1950s the name H. solstitalis has been misinterpreted in European literature. This concept, introduced by Lyneborg, is shown to be a light coloured variety of H. bimaculata. introduction The horseflies (family Tabanidae) are a median The discovery by Lyneborg (15) of the impor- sized family (about 170 species in Europe, Chvála tance of the shape of the subgenital plate, espe- et al. (172)) of median to very large flies (6- cially in the H. bimaculata-group, was a major 25 mm). Females are notorious for sucking blood breakthrough in the taxonomy of the genus on both humans and livestock. In the palearctic Hybomitra. Unfortunately, he distinguished too region, the tribe Tabanini of the subfamily Taban- many species due to underestimating of the inae is the most abundant group of horseflies. colour variation. This was largely corrected by In the palearctic region the horsefly genera are Chvála et al. (172), introducing a system that has well defined. Identification of species is often been followed since (Moucha 176, Olsufjev 177, difficult due to variability in coloration and Trojan 17, Timmer 10, Chvála 1, Zeegers paucity of structural features. Identification is & Van Haaren 2000, Stubbs & Drake 2001, especially challenging in the genus Hybomitra Portillo 2002). Enderlein, 122, characterized by the presence of an ocellar tubercle on the vertex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Distribution of the Horseflies Atylotus Plebeius and Hybomitra Lurida on the Cheshire Plain Area of North West England
    The status and distribution of the horseflies Atylotus plebeius and Hybomitra lurida on the Cheshire Plain area of North West England Including assessments of mire habitats and accounts of other horseflies (Tabanidae) Atylotus plebeius (Fallén) [Cheshire Horsefly]: male from Little Budworth Common 10th June 2018; female from Shemmy Moss 9th June 2018 A report to Gary Hedges, Tanyptera Regional Entomology Project Officer, Entomology, National Museums Liverpool, World Museum, William Brown Street, L3 8EN Email: [email protected] By entomological consultant Andrew Grayson, ‘Scardale’, High Lane, Beadlam, Nawton, York, YO62 7SX Email: [email protected] Based on The results of a survey carried out during 2018 Report submitted on 2nd March 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 SUMMARY . 1 THE CHESHIRE PLAIN AREA MIRES . 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO ATYLOTUS PLEBEIUS IN THE CHESHIRE PLAIN AREA . 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO HYBOMITRA LURIDA IN THE CHESHIRE PLAIN AREA . 2 OTHER HORSEFLIES RECORDED IN THE CHESHIRE PLAIN AREA . 3 METHODOLOGY FOR THE 2018 SURVEY . 3 INTRODUCTION . 3 RECONNAISSANCE . 4 THE SURVEY . 4 LOCALITIES . 5 ABBOTS MOSS COMPLEX MIRES ON FOREST CAMP LAND . 5 ABBOTS MOSS COMPLEX MIRES ON FORESTRY COMMISSION LAND . 7 BRACKENHURST BOG AND NEWCHURCH COMMON . 8 DELAMERE FOREST MIRES . 9 LITTLE BUDWORTH COMMON MIRES . 17 PETTY POOL AREA WETLANDS . 18 MISCELLANEOUS DELAMERE AREA MIRES . 19 WYBUNBURY MOSS AND CHARTLEY MOSS . 21 BROWN MOSS . 22 CLAREPOOL MOSS AND COLE MERE . 23 THE FENN’S, WHIXALL, BETTISFIELD, WEM AND CADNEY MOSSES COMPLEX SSSI MIRES . 24 POTENTIAL HOST ANIMALS FOR FEMALE TABANIDAE BLOOD MEALS . 26 RESULTS . 27 TABANIDAE . 27 SUMMARY . 27 SPECIES ACCOUNTS . 27 TABLE SHOWING DISSECTION OF HORSEFLY NUMBERS .
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Atherix Ibis (Diptera, Athericidae) in Fennoscandia
    © Entomologica Fennica. l2.X.l993 Distribution of Atherix ibis (Diptera, Athericidae) in Fennoscandia J. ltiimies, K. Kuusela & K. Karvonen Itamies, J., Kuusela, K. & Karvonen, K. 1993: Distribution of Atherix ibis (Diptera, Athericidae) in Fennoscandia.- Entomol. Fennica 4:161-164. The Finnish distribution of Atherix ibis (Fabricius) was surveyed by searching for the female cones, or clusters, from the underside of bridges, by kick-net sampling (2 min) in the running water habitats and by newspaper inquires. Additional records were received from our colleagues, as well as from neigh­ bouring countries. A. ibis was found in Finland from ten biogeographical provinces forming a clear northern and eastern distribution. The Fennoscandian distribution acquired a western extension due to recent discoveries in northern Sweden. J. ltiimies, K. Kuusela & K. Karvonen, Department of Zoology, University of Oulu, Linnanmaa, F/N-90570 Oulu, Finland 1. Introduction pool sections as well) were inspected for the female clusters. The field trips were directed at Atherix ibis (Fabricius, 1798), the Ibis fly, is a northern and eastern Finland in 1989 (mainly in brachycheran fly assigned with other species to August), at Central Ostrobothnia in 1991 , and at their own family Athericidae by Stuckenberg Northern Tavastia and Northern Savonia in 1992. (1973). It is the only Finnish species of the genus Secondly, kick samples (2 min.) from the river (Hackman 1980). The published records of A. ibis bottom were also taken. Thirdly, inquiries were from Finland have indicated a northerly distribu­ made via local newspapers. Additional observa­ tion (Frey 1911, 1950, Itamies et al. 1990). The tions were reported by our colleagues (see ac­ aim of this contribution is to give up-to-date knowledgements).
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Athericidae)
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 54 (30/6/2014): 349–350. FIRST PORTUGUESE RECORD OF THE GENUS ATRICHOPS VERRALL (DIPTERA: ATHERICIDAE) Rui Andrade Rua Calouste Gulbenkian 237 4H3, Porto, Portugal – [email protected] Abstract: The dipteran family Athericidae is, in Portugal, insufficiently known with only one species recorded to date. In this paper, the species Atrichops crassipes (Meigen, 1820) is recorded for the first time in Portugal increasing the number of species of this family in the country from one to two. Key words: Diptera, Athericidae, Atrichops crassipes, new record, distribution, Portugal. Primera cita portuguesa del género Atrichops Verrall (Diptera: Athericidae). Resumen: La familia de dípteros Athericidae está insuficientemente conocida en Portugal, de donde se ha citado sólo una especie hasta ahora. En este trabajo, la especie Atrichops crassipes (Meigen, 1820) se cita por primera vez de Portugal, incrementando el número de especies de esta familia en el país de una a dos. Palabras clave: Diptera, Athericidae, Atrichops crassipes, cita nueva, distribución, Portugal. Athericidae (Diptera) is a small family of brachyceran flies The location where the single specimen was collected, related to the Tabanidae. The adults are medium sized with which is situated on the outskirts of the city of Valongo, suf- dark bodies often with transversely fasciate abdominal ter- fers from intense human pressure. The watercourses on the gites. The eyes in males nearly meet, while females are di- area are polluted and is common to find garbage along the choptic, and both have ocelli. Antenna is short with flagellum margins. The dominant tree species is the eucalyptus (Euca- reniform.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wing Stalk in Diptera, with Some Notes on the Higher-Level Phylogeny of the Order
    POINT OF VIEW Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 27–33, 2008 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1297 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) The wing stalk in Diptera, with some notes on the higher-level phylogeny of the order JAROSLAV STARÝ Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Faculty of Science of the Palacký University, tĜ. Svobody 26, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Diptera, morphology, wing stalk, higher-level phylogeny Abstract. The wing stalk in Diptera is examined, and its structures are re-evaluated and re-interpreted. The non-homology of A2 in Tipulomorpha and “A2” in other Diptera is claimed. Some notes are presented on the higher-level phylogeny of Diptera, especially those concerning Tipulomorpha. The family Trichoceridae is restored among Tipulomorpha, and the Tipulomorpha are re-affirmed as the sister group of the remaining Diptera. The clade Anisopodidae + Culicomorpha + Bibionomorpha is suggested as the sister group of Brachycera. INTRODUCTION chodomorpha, and particular taxa are treated at family Hennig (1968) published a comprehensive treatment of level. The infraorders accepted are conceived here as fol- the evolution of the wing base in Diptera, i.e., the com- lows: Tipulomorpha: Trichoceridae, Limoniidae, Pedicii- plex of features within the so-called wing stalk, mainly dae, Tipulidae, Cylindrotomidae; Culicomorpha: Simuli- idae, Dixidae, Culicidae, Thaumaleidae, Ceratopogon- the reduction of A2 and the development of the alula. He idae, Chironomidae; Bibionomorpha: Cecidomyiidae, concluded that A2 is reduced in Diptera other than Tipulo- morpha and only retained as a more or less sclerotised, Bibionidae, Axymyiidae, Mycetophilidae s.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 614 Stream Visual Assessment Protocol Version 2
    United States Department of National Biology Handbook Agriculture Natural Subpart B—Conservation Planning Resources Conservation Service Part 614 Stream Visual Assessment Protocol Version 2 South Carolina Washington Utah Iowa (190–VI–NBH, Amend. 3, December 2009) Issued draft December 2009 For additional information contact: Fisheries Biologist West National Technology Support Center 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1000 Portland, OR 97232 (503) 273–2400 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for commu- nication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. (190–VI–NBH, Amend. 3, December 2009) Preface This document presents a revised and updated NRCS Stream Visual As- sessment Protocol Version 2 (SVAP2) for use by conservation planners, field office personnel, and private landowners. Like its predecessor, it is a relatively easy-to-use tool for qualitatively evaluating the condition of aquatic ecosystems associated with wadeable streams, that is, those shal- low enough to be sampled without use of a boat.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the Larval Stages of Aquatic True Flies (Diptera), Based on the Operational Taxa List for Running Waters in Germany
    Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 2007, 43 (1), 61-74 Key to the larval stages of aquatic true flies (Diptera), based on the operational taxa list for running waters in Germany A. Sundermann1*, S. Lohse1, L.A. Beck2, P. Haase1 1 Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Department of Limnology and Conservation, Clamecystrasse 12, D-63571 Gelnhausen, Germany 2 Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Zoology, Marburg, Germany The aquatic larvae of the Diptera are often the most abundant and most diverse group of the benthic macroinvertebrate fauna. They are able to survive in and colonise practically all freshwater habitats, and some species can tolerate harsh environmental conditions. They are therefore both a qualitatively and quantitatively important group of biological indicators for assessing fresh- water systems. On the other hand their determination at the species level is very difficult. This is in part due to a lack of taxo- nomic work in the group, but also the absence of comprehensive determination keys, that meet the needs of water managers. As a result, the aquatic larvae of the Diptera often play a subordinate role in water management. In light of the EU Water Framework Directive the present work is a first step in improving the integration of the important group of the Diptera in water management practice: a comprehensive determination key, which is geared at water managers. The key includes 60 taxa, largely at the family and genus level. In contrast to already existing keys the present work tries to differentiate the taxa on the basis of simple and user-friendly characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicestershire Entomological Society
    LEICESTERSHIRE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY The status of Diptera in VC55 Families with up to 10 species Ray Morris [email protected] LESOPS 40 (August 2021) ISSN 0957 - 1019 LESOPS 40 (2021): Small families 2 Introduction A preliminary assessment of the status of flies (Diptera) in Leicestershire & Rutland (VC55) was produced in 2019 (Morris, 2019). Summaries of the number of species in families known to be in VC55 at that time were presented with the intention that fuller status assessments would be made in due course. The known records of flies to the end of 2020 are now being collated, checked, validated and plotted in order to produce a sequence of status reports as part of the Leicestershire Entomological Society Occasional Publication Series (LESOPS). Reviews of the Conopidae and Tephritidae have already appeared (Morris, 2021a, b) and are now followed by consideration of records from the fly families with a maximum of 10 species (Table 1). Table 1: Families with up to 10 species (based on Dipterists Forum listing January 2021). Acartophthalmidae (2) Campichoetidae (2) Helcomyzidae (1) Pseudopomyzidae (1) Acroceridae (3) Chaoboridae (6) Heterocheilidae (1) Ptychopteridae (7) Anisopodidae (4) Chiropteromyzidae (1) Lonchopteridae (7) Rhiniidae (1) Asteiidae (8) Clusidae (10) Meganerinidae (1) Rhinophoridae (8) Atelestidae (2) Cnemospathidae (1) Micropezidae (10) Scenopinidae (2) Athericidae (3) Coelopidae (3) Mycetobiidae (3) Stenomicridae (3) Aulacigastridae (1) Cryptochetidae (1) Nycteribiidae (3) Strongylophthalmyiidae (1) Bombylidae
    [Show full text]