DRAFT Mckay Creek National Wildlife Refuge Turkey, Dove, Deer, and Elk Hunt Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DRAFT Mckay Creek National Wildlife Refuge Turkey, Dove, Deer, and Elk Hunt Plan DRAFT McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge Turkey, Dove, Deer, and Elk Hunt Plan June 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge Mid-Columbia River NWR Complex 64 Maple Street Burbank, WA 99323 Submitted By: Project Leader ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Concurrence: Refuge Supervisor ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Approved: Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………...…………………………………………4 II. Statement of Objectives…………………..………………………………………..6 III. Description of Hunting Program……………………………………………….....7 A. Areas to be Opened to Hunting…………………………………...7 B. Species to be Taken, Hunting Periods, Hunting Access………….9 C. Hunter Permit Requirements (if applicable)……………………..10 D. Consultation and Coordination with the State…………………...10 E. Law Enforcement………………………………………………...11 F. Funding and Staffing Requirements …………………………….11 IV. Conduct of the Hunt Program….…………………………………………………11 A. Hunter Permit Application, Selection, and/or Registration Procedures (if applicable).………………………………………...11 B. Refuge-Specific Regulations ……………………………………..12 C. Relevant State Regulations ……………………………………….13 D. Other Rules and Regulations for Hunters…………………………14 V. Public Engagement A. Outreach Plan for Announcing and Publicizing the Hunt………...15 B. Anticipated Public Reaction to the Hunting Program ……………15 C. How the Public Will be Informed of Relevant Rules and Draft McKay Creek NWR Turkey, Dove, Deer and Elk Hunt Plan Page 2 Regulations……………………….………………………………15 VI. Compatibility Determination……………………………………………………..16 References ……………………………………………………………………….16 Appendix A, McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Umatilla County, Oregon. Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Elk, Deer, Turkey, and Dove Hunts...…………………………………………………………………….17 Appendix B, Draft Compatibility Determination for Turkey, Dove, Deer, and Elk Hunting...…………………………………………………………………….47 List of Figures Map A. McKay Creek NWR Hunt Map. …………………………………………………………………………………….8 Draft McKay Creek NWR Turkey, Dove, Deer and Elk Hunt Plan Page 3 MCKAY CREEK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE DRAFT TURKEY, DOVE, DEER, and ELK HUNT PLAN I. Introduction National Wildlife Refuges are guided by the mission and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS, Refuge), the purposes of an individual refuge, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (hereafter referred to as the Service or USFWS, interchangeable) policy, and laws and international treaties. Relevant guidance includes the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, and selected portions of the Code of Federal Regulations and the Service’s Manual. This refuge was established as the McKay Creek Bird Refuge on June 7, 1927, through Executive Order 4662. This executive order of President Calvin Coolidge reserved the McKay Creek Bird Refuge as a refuge and breeding ground for birds to be managed by the Department of Agriculture. The Public Land Order 1366, issued November 27, 1956 by the Secretary of the Interior withdrew additional public lands to enlarge the McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge (MCNWR) by 23.5 acres. On August 25, 1955, the Service and the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) signed an agreement whereby the Service took over primary management of fish and wildlife resources. The agreement has been renewed over the intervening years and is still in effect. MCNWR is currently part of the Mid-Columbia River National Wildlife Refuge Complex (MCRNWRC). The primary purpose of the refuge is to provide a “…refuge and breeding place for birds.” At establishment (1927), it provided critical open water wintering areas in an arid landscape dominated by free-flowing rivers and streams. The damming of the Columbia River and the conversion of upland sage-steppe and grassland to dryland and irrigated agriculture led to a boom of wintering waterfowl in the Mid-Columbia River region, particularly in the Oregon portion near the towns of Umatilla, Irrigon, and Boardman. The 1,837-acre refuge overlays McKay Creek Reservoir, a BOR storage facility, serving the irrigation needs of the Umatilla River Basin. Since establishment there has been no active management of the reservoir to attract wintering waterfowl, and use is largely limited to loafing on the open reservoir and some feeding on wetland plants that grow on its shoreline. A small seasonal wetland area where McKay Creek empties into the reservoir receives some waterfowl and other water bird use, but the refuge lacks any capability to actively manage the wetland habitat. The refuge features 379 acres of healthy shrub and tree riparian habitat that forms a contiguous linkage along McKay Creek from the headwaters in the Blue Mountains to the confluence with the Umatilla River. This area provides habitat for migratory land birds and other riparian- Draft McKay Creek NWR Turkey, Dove, Deer and Elk Hunt Plan Page 4 dependent species. This riparian forest is considered a high priority habitat for the refuge due to the limited presence of riparian habitats in the local landscape and the habitat linkages it provides. The mission of the NWRS, as outlined by the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (NWRSAA), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), is to: “...administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.” The NWRSAA mandates the Secretary of the Interior in administering the System to (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(4): ● Provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants, and their habitats within the NWRS; ● Ensure that the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the NWRS are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans; ● Ensure that the mission of the NWRS described at 16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(2) and the purposes of each refuge are carried out; ● Ensure effective coordination, interaction, and cooperation with owners of land adjoining refuges and the fish and wildlife agency of the States in which the units of the NWRS are located; ● Assist in the maintenance of adequate water quantity and water quality to fulfill the mission of the NWRS and the purposes of each refuge; ● Recognize compatible wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public uses of the NWRS through which the American public can develop an appreciation for fish and wildlife; ● Ensure that opportunities are provided within the NWRS for compatible wildlife- dependent recreational uses; and ● Monitor the status and trends of fish, wildlife, and plants in each refuge. Therefore, it is a priority of the Service to provide for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities, including hunting and fishing, when those opportunities are compatible with the purposes for which the refuge was established and the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System. On March 2, 2017, Secretary Zinke signed Secretarial Order 3347, Conservation Stewardship and Outdoor Recreation. Part of the stated purpose of Secretarial Order 3347 is to increase outdoor recreation and improve the management of game species and their habitat. Secretarial Order 3347 directs the Department of the Interior to identify specific actions to (1) expand access significantly for recreational hunting and fishing on public lands; and (2) improve recreational hunting and fishing cooperation, consultation, and communication with state wildlife managers. Draft McKay Creek NWR Turkey, Dove, Deer and Elk Hunt Plan Page 5 On September 15, 2017, Secretary Zinke signed Secretarial Order 3356, Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories. Part of the stated purpose of Secretarial Order 3356 is to increase outdoor recreation opportunities for all Americans in greater collaboration with state partners, including opportunities to hunt. Waterfowl and upland bird hunting are currently permitted on MCNWR within the designated hunt area, on designated days and in accordance with Oregon State regulations. Upland bird hunting is favored; a lottery to manage hunter numbers for the opening weekend of the season is required and has been very popular. Upland bird hunters primarily hunt California quail and ring-necked pheasant. Fishing is probably the most popular wildlife-oriented activity on the refuge. In early spring, anglers fish for trout at the mouth of McKay Creek. By summer, anglers primarily target warm- water fish, mainly crappie, bass, perch and catfish. This hunt plan will provide visitors with additional recreational opportunities in an area where there are limited opportunities to hunt on public lands. II. Statement of Objectives The objectives of a turkey hunting program on McKay Creek NWR are to provide: ● The public with an opportunity to experience wildlife on more refuge lands and increase opportunities for hunters, especially for youth and families; ● An ideal species to offer additional hunting opportunities and greater alignment with the State as mandated by Secretarial Orders Number 3347 and 3356;
Recommended publications
  • Operation and Maintenance of the Umatilla Project and Umatilla Basin Project, Umatilla County
    UNITED STA1ES OEPARlMENTOF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE West Coast Region 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard , Su~e 1100 Portland, Oregon 97232-1274 July 2, 2019 Refer to NMFS No: WCR-2018-10032 Dawn Wiedmeier Area Manager Columbia-Cascades Area Office U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 1917 Marsh Road Yakima, Washington 98901 Re: Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation on Operation and Maintenance of the Umatilla Project and Umatilla Basin Project, Umatilla County. Oregon, HUC 17070103 (Umatilla), HUC 17070101 (Columbia-Lake Wallula). Enclosed is a biological opinion (opinion) prepared by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) pursuant to section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on the effects of operating the Umatilla Project and the Umatilla Basin Project in Umatilla County, Oregon. NMFS concludes in this opinion that the operation of the Umatilla and Umatilla Basin Projects is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the following ESA-listed species: Middle Columbia River steelhead Upper Columbia River steelhead Snake River Basin steelhead Snake River sockeye salmon Upper Columbia River spring-run Chinook salmon Snake River spring/summer-run Chinook salmon Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon NMFS also concludes that the proposed action is not likely to destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat. As required by section 7 of the ESA, NMFS included reasonable and prudent measures with nondiscretionary terms and conditions that NMFS believes are necessary to avoid or minimize the effect of incidental take caused by this action.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Umatilla-Walla Walla Rivers
    Chapter: 10 States: Oregon and Washington Recovery Unit Name: Umatilla -Walla Walla Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 11, Umatilla- Walla Walla Recovery Unit, Oregon and Washington. 153 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Umatilla-Walla Walla recovery unit team includes technical experts from Oregon and Washington. A bull trout technical working group made up of area biologists was organized in the early 1990's to survey and monitor bull trout populations in the Umatilla and upper Walla Walla Basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fish Habitat Enhancement Project
    Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fish Habitat Enhancement Project Annual Report 2004 - 2005 May 2006 DOE/BP-00006513-3 This Document should be cited as follows: Lewis, R, Billy Goodrich, "Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fish Habitat Enhancement Project", 2004-2005 Annual Report, Project No. 198710001, 91 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00006513-3) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. UMATILLA RIVER BASIN ANADROMOUS FISH HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FEBRUARY 2004 – JANUARY 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Prepared by: R.H. Lewis, Fish Habitat Biologist And Billy Goodrich, Assistant Fish Habitat Biologist Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Program Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Project No. 1987-100-01 Contract Number 00006513 May 2005 ABSTRACT The Umatilla River Basin Anadromous Fish Habitat Enhancement Project continued to identify impacted stream reaches throughout the Umatilla River Basin for habitat improvements during the 2004-2005 contract period. Public outreach efforts, biological and physical monitoring assisted the project in fostering public cooperation, targeting habitat deficiencies, and determining habitat recovery measures. Instream improvements were made on Spring Hollow Creek and Sears Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • US Highway 395 South
    Corridor Strategy U.S. Highway 395 South (Pendleton - California Border) Region 5 301 2 Island Avenue La Grande, Oregon 97850 Table of Contents U.S. Highway 395 (Pendleton to California) Final Draft Corridor Strategy Page I. Executive Summary Introduction ..........................................1 Corridor Planning Process ..............................3 Corridor Strategy Document ............................ -4 Corridor Description ...................................5 Findings and ConcEuszons ............................... 6 Key Themes and Overall Corridor Strategy .................8 Public Involvement ....................................8 Nextsteps ...........................................10 II . Introduction Purpose of Strategy ...................................11 Overview and Purpose of Corridor Planning ...............12 Planning Requirements ................................13 Corridor Planning Process. Products and Participants ...... 14 Summary of Related Plans and Studies ..................15 III . Corridor Overview Role Corridor Plays in the Region .......................20 General Corridor Description ...........................20 Affected Environment .................................23 Population and Employment ...........................38 Table of Contents U.S. Highway 395 (Pendleton to California) Draft Corridor Strategy (Continued) Corridor Characteristics ...............................40 A . Highway System ................................40 B . Rail Service ....................................61 C. Air Service .....................................63
    [Show full text]
  • Mckay Dam Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 14546 Preliminary
    20160531-5268 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/31/2016 7:51:12 AM McKay Dam Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 14546 Preliminary Application Document (PAD) Houtama Hydropower LLC May, 2016 20160531-5268 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/31/2016 7:51:12 AM Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 PROPOSED PROJECT FACILITIES AND BOUNDARY ................................................. 1-2 1.3 AGENTS FOR THE LICENSEE .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 PRELIMINARY APPLICATION DOCUMENT (“PAD”) CONTENT .............................. 1-4 2.0 PROCESS PLAN AND SCHEDULE 2.1 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOLS 3.1 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS ...................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 TELEPHONE ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 EMAIL AND WEBSITES .................................................................................................... 3-1 3.4 MEETINGS ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.5 DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................... 3-2 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF
    [Show full text]
  • Wanapa Energy Center Final Environmental Impact Statement
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs December 2004 Wanapa Energy Center Final Environmental Impact Statement Cooperating Agencies: DOE/EIS-0342 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................ES-1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..........................................................................................AA-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Background...........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need..............................................................................................................1-3 1.2.1 Underlying Need for Action.................................................................................1-3 1.3 Federal Agency Approval Process and Authorizing Actions..........................................1-8 1.3.1 Bureau of Indian Affairs.......................................................................................1-8 1.3.1.1 Trust Responsibilities............................................................................1-8 1.3.2 Bonneville Power Administration........................................................................1-9 1.3.3 Bureau of Reclamation.........................................................................................1-9 1.4 Non-Federal Agency Approval
    [Show full text]
  • Umatilla Project Draft 2
    Umatilla Project Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation 1993 Table of Contents The Umatilla Project ...........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................2 Project Authorization.....................................................3 Construction History .....................................................4 Post Construction History .................................................9 Settlement of Project ....................................................11 Uses of Project Water ...................................................13 Conclusion............................................................14 About the Author .............................................................14 Bibliography ................................................................15 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................15 Engineering Reports ..............................................15 Government Documents .................................................15 Books ................................................................15 Articles...............................................................15 Index ......................................................................16 1 The Umatilla Project In the 1840s prospective farmers traveled across the United States' Louisiana Purchase in the hope of obtaining good farmland in Oregon. These early settlers primarily
    [Show full text]