DOCSLIB.ORG

Educational Outreach for Local Land Use Planning Organizations Strategic Outreach Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Educational Outreach for Local Land Use Planning Organizations Strategic Outreach Plan Educational Outreach for Local Land Use Planning Organizations Strategic Outreach Plan Resources Legacy Fund ‐ California Water Foundation Grant Prepared by Cristel Tufenkjian | June 2013 BACKGROUND Groundwater is a major source of drinking and irrigation supply for the Kings Basin region. The San Joaquin Valley has become one of the State’s most rapidly growing areas. Continued population growth and changing cropping patterns place additional stress on local groundwater supplies in the Kings Basin impacting groundwater quantity and quality. Managing groundwater to meet current and future needs is a significant challenge in the region. Groundwater overdraft is generally considered the largest regional problem with the current overdraft estimated to be 100,000 to 150,000 acre feet/year causing a long‐term decline in groundwater storage. Cities and counties under State law are responsible for land‐use decisions. Local agencies have their own water planning documents that reflect their policies and goals. Local water plans include Urban Water Management Plans, Groundwater Management Plans, Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans, Water Conservation Plans, Agricultural Water Management Plans, and General Plans. However, many land‐use documents provide few, if any, details on regional overdraft, groundwater management, new water supply development, and impact on irrigation facilities. The land‐use planning documents also have few details on how they plan to reach their water management goals. Nevertheless, local cities and counties through their planning processes have taken steps to link decisions on land use and water resources. In the past, land use and water supply decisions were made independently; however, in recent years legislation and court precedence have begun changing the planning process. Two such pieces of legislation, SB 610 and SB 221, are companion measures with the intent to promote collaborative planning between cities, counties, and water suppliers. Similarly, Local Agency Formation Commissions are required to ensure water supplies are available before approving city or district boundary amendments. The IRWM process provides for many opportunities to collaborate and integrate with local land planners. Integration of the prevailing land use with water supply plans and the water planning process is an important strategy for the Kings Basin IRWMP and is one the strategies for achieving the Kings Basin IRWMP Goals and Objectives. SITUATION ANALYSIS Land use is frequently indicated to be one of the main human‐induced factors influencing the groundwater system. The Kings Basin has experienced significant changes in land use over the last several decades. The Basin is an overdrafted system. Land‐use decisions that do not consider groundwater impacts are detrimental to the sustainability of the groundwater supply. Land‐use decisions are jurisdictional; while groundwater management is regional. Decisions regarding growth can be contentious when city and county land‐use decisions are not aligned with water resource management objectives. CENTRAL CORE OF DIFFICULTY Land‐use planners do not have readily available concise information that provides them with a regional perspective on groundwater conditions and issues. Communications between land‐use planners and water resource managers are not fully developed. Evaluation of water impacts are more localized rather than part of regional solutions. IDENTIFICATION OF PUBLICS AND RESOURCES Key Publics: land use planners (municipal staff and consultants), boards of supervisors, city council members, LAFCO boards and staff, community service districts Influencers: developers, irrigation district boards and staff, farm bureaus, media, service clubs, California Water Institute, Fresno Council of Governments, Valley Planners Network, Association of Environmental Professionals, professional land use planner organizations, Kings Basin Water Authority members CAMPAIGN GOALS Provide education and awareness to land‐use planners and decision makers about groundwater conditions and issues. CAMPAIGN OBJECTIVES Objective 1: Develop educational materials regarding groundwater conditions and issues. Objective 2: Outreach to local land‐use planning community creating a dialog and fostering closer relationships with water resource managers. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Land Use Element Within the Comprehensive Planning Process 2
    Chapter The Land Use Element within the Comprehensive Planning Process 2 Included in this chapter: The Land Use Element: Framework and Requirements Using the Land Use Element to Integrate Elements Developing Consistency Between Plan Elements Designing a Public Participation Plan Introduction The land use element is often lengthy as it serves as a centerpiece of the comprehensive The land use element is one of nine required plan and ties together many other elements. elements within Wisconsin’s comprehensive This chapter includes a discussion of the planning law. The major goal in completing statutory requirements, a section on how to this element is to create a useful tool for use the land use element to integrate other decision makers (elected officials and plan elements, and public participation plan commissioners) to guide growth and essential to the development of the plan. development in their communities, for developers as they seek planned areas to advance projects, and for residents and others to make known their desire for growth and change in the future. Chapter 2 – The Land Use Element within the Comprehensive Planning Process Land Use Element (§66.1001(2)(h)) - Statutory language A compilation of objectives, policies, goals, maps and programs to guide the future development and redevelopment of public and private property. The element shall contain a listing of the amount, type, intensity, and net density of existing uses of land in the local governmental unit, such as agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial, and other public and private uses. The element shall analyze trends in the supply, demand and price of land, opportunities for redevelopment and existing and potential land-use conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanistica N. 146 April-June 2011
    Urbanistica n. 146 April-June 2011 Distribution by www.planum.net Index and english translation of the articles Paolo Avarello The plan is dead, long live the plan edited by Gianfranco Gorelli Urban regeneration: fundamental strategy of the new structural Plan of Prato Paolo Maria Vannucchi The ‘factory town’: a problematic reality Michela Brachi, Pamela Bracciotti, Massimo Fabbri The project (pre)view Riccardo Pecorario The path from structure Plan to urban design edited by Carla Ferrari A structural plan for a ‘City of the wine’: the Ps of the Municipality of Bomporto Projects and implementation Raffaella Radoccia Co-planning Pto in the Val Pescara Mariangela Virno Temporal policies in the Abruzzo Region Stefano Stabilini, Roberto Zedda Chronographic analysis of the Urban systems. The case of Pescara edited by Simone Ombuen The geographical digital information in the planning ‘knowledge frameworks’ Simone Ombuen The european implementation of the Inspire directive and the Plan4all project Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen, Interoperability and spatial planners: a proposal for a land use Franco Vico ‘data model’ Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen What is a land use data model? Giuseppe De Marco Interoperability and metadata catalogues Stefano Magaudda Relationships among regional planning laws, ‘knowledge fra- meworks’ and Territorial information systems in Italy Gaia Caramellino Towards a national Plan. Shaping cuban planning during the fifties Profiles and practices Rosario Pavia Waterfrontstory Carlos Smaniotto Costa, Monica Bocci Brasilia, the city of the future is 50 years old. The urban design and the challenges of the Brazilian national capital Michele Talia To research of one impossible balance Antonella Radicchi On the sonic image of the city Marco Barbieri Urban grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2010 Update City Of
    COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 2010 UPDATE CITY OF SPRINGDALE, ARKANSAS The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is the City’s official guide for future development of the City. It translates values into a scheme that describes, how, why, when and where to build, rebuild or preserve the community. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN covers a period greater than one year but does not have a definite time limit. In the past the Land Use Plan was considered to be a snapshot or frozen image of what the City would look like twenty, thirty or forty years later, but there was little guidance as to how to get there. This Comprehensive Land Use Plan expresses current goals and policies that will shape the future, rather than show a rigid image of the future itself. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN covers the entire city and its established planning area. Arkansas Statues §14-56-413 allows the City to designate the area within the territorial jurisdiction for which it will prepare plans, ordinances and regulations. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is a statement of policy that covers such community desires as quality of life, character, and rate of grow and indicates how these desires are to be achieved. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is not a zoning ordinance, subdivision regulation, official map, budget or capital improvement program. It is a guide to the preparation and the carrying out of the components of the planning process. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is a guide to decision making by the Planning Commission, the City Council and the Mayor.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Use of Soils and Water: the Role of Environmental Land Use Conflicts
    sustainability Editorial Sustainable Use of Soils and Water: The Role of Environmental Land Use Conflicts Fernando A. L. Pacheco CQVR – Chemistry Research Centre, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados Ap. 1013, Vila Real 5001-801, Portugal; [email protected] Received: 3 February 2020; Accepted: 4 February 2020; Published: 6 February 2020 Abstract: Sustainability is a utopia of societies, that could be achieved by a harmonious balance between socio-economic development and environmental protection, including the sustainable exploitation of natural resources. The present Special Issue addresses a multiplicity of realities that confirm a deviation from this utopia in the real world, as well as the concerns of researchers. These scholars point to measures that could help lead the damaged environment to a better status. The studies were focused on sustainable use of soils and water, as well as on land use or occupation changes that can negatively affect the quality of those resources. Some other studies attempt to assess (un)sustainability in specific regions through holistic approaches, like the land carrying capacity, the green gross domestic product or the eco-security models. Overall, the special issue provides a panoramic view of competing interests for land and the consequences for the environment derived therefrom. Keywords: water resources; soil; land use change; conflicts; environmental degradation; sustainability Competition for land is a worldwide problem affecting developed as well as developing countries, because the economic growth of activity sectors often requires the expansion of occupied land, sometimes to places that overlap different sectors. Besides the social tension and conflicts eventually caused by the competing interests for land, the environmental problems they can trigger and sustain cannot be overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Policy and Urbanization in the People's Republic of China
    ADBI Working Paper Series LAND POLICY AND URBANIZATION IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Li Zhang and Xianxiang Xu No. 614 November 2016 Asian Development Bank Institute Li Zhang is an associate professor at the International School of Business & Finance, Sun Yat-sen University. Xianxiang Xu is a professor at the Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Zhang, L., and X. Xu. 2016. Land Policy and Urbanization in the People’s Republic of China. ADBI Working Paper 614. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/land-policy-and-urbanization-prc Please contact the authors for information about this paper. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Unless otherwise stated, figures and tables without explicit sources were prepared by the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES for MANAGING LAND USE the Ecological Society of America’S Committee on Land Use
    ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES FOR MANAGING LAND USE The Ecological Society of Americas Committee on Land Use Key ecological principles for land use and management deal with time, species, place, disturbance, and the landscape. The principles result in several guidelines that serve as practical rules of thumb for incorporating ecological principles into making decisions about the land. April 2000 INTRODUCTION DEFINITIONS Humans are the major force of change around the Land cover: the ecological state and physical appearance globe, transforming land to provide food, shelter, and of the land surface (e.g., closed forests, open forests, grasslands). products for use. Land transformation affects many of the planets physical, chemical, and biological systems and Land use: the purpose to which land is put by humans directly impacts the ability of the Earth to continue (e.g., protected areas, forestry for timber products, providing the goods and services upon which humans plantations, row-crop agriculture, pastures, or human settlements). depend. Unfortunately, potential ecological consequences are Ecosystem management: the process of land use not always considered in making decisions regarding land decision-making and land management practice that takes into account the best available understanding of the use. In this brochure, we identify ecological principles that ecosystems full suite of organisms and natural processes. are critical to sustaining ecosystems in the face of land- use change. We also offer guidelines for using these Land management: the way a given land use is principles in making decisions regarding land-use change. administered by humans. This brochure is the first of many activities under a Land Ecological sustainability: the tendency of a system or Use Initiative of the Ecological Society of America.
    [Show full text]
  • An Axiomatic Foundation of the Ecological Footprint
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kuhn, Thomas; Pestow, Radomir; Zenker, Anja Working Paper An Axiomatic Foundation of the Ecological Footprint Chemnitz Economic Papers, No. 025 Provided in Cooperation with: Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Suggested Citation: Kuhn, Thomas; Pestow, Radomir; Zenker, Anja (2018) : An Axiomatic Foundation of the Ecological Footprint, Chemnitz Economic Papers, No. 025, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/190431 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Faculty of Economics and Business Administration An Axiomatic Foundation of the Ecological Footprint Thomas Kuhn Radomir Pestow Anja Zenker Chemnitz Economic Papers, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies to Reduce Land Use Competition and Increasing the Share of Biomass in the German Energy Supply
    18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 3-7 May 2010, Lyon, France STRATEGIES TO REDUCE LAND USE COMPETITION AND INCREASING THE SHARE OF BIOMASS IN THE GERMAN ENERGY SUPPLY Christine Rösch, Juliane Jörissen, Johannes Skarka, Martin Knapp Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) PO Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany ABSTRACT: Bioenergy is expected to become one of the key energy resources for global sustainable development. However, bioenergy cannot be infinite, because the land area available for biomass production is limited and a certain amount of biomass must be reserved for food and materials. Land management is a topic that has long been neglected in sustainable development of bioenergy although land is a limited resource. That is now changing, mainly due to the political support for energy crops generating an increased competition for arable land on both a domestic and a global scale. This paper first gives an overview of the different land functions and the allocation of land use. Then, focusing on the German conditions, it investigates strategies to reduce the demand for land and the negative impact of land use. Keywords: land use, strategies, energy, biomass 1 INTRODUCTION maintenance of water and nutrients circulation, alteration and degradation of harmful substances and conservation The availability of suitable space to satisfy the of genetic resources. Land is also an archive for cultural different needs for food and fodder, raw materials and and natural history. bioenergy, settlement and transportation, and recreation Land cannot be consumed in the proper sense of the and tourism as well as to protect nature and the climate is word; but it can be used in such a way that the spectrum strongly restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Degradation Knowledge Base: Policy, Concepts and Data
    ETC/ULS Report | 01/2019 Land degradation knowledge base: policy, concepts and data ISBN 978-3-200-06666-3 Authors: Authors: EvaEva Ivits Ivits (EEA (EEA),), Simone Simone Verzandvoort, Verzandvoort, Rudi Hessel,Rudi Hessel, Henk Wösten Henk Wösten (Wageningen Env. Research(Wageningen), Gergely Env. Tóth Research (Hungarian), Gergely Academy Tóth of Sciences),(Hungarian Mélanie Academy Weynants, of Michiel CherletSciences), (JRC) Mélanie, Stépha nieWeynants, Horion (Univ. Michiel of Copenhagen) Cherlet (JRC), Gergely, Stépha Mauchanie Horion (Lechner Non- profit(Univ. Ltd of), Copenhagen)Gundula Prokop, Gergely (Environment Maucha Agency (Lechner Austria), non Mirko-profit Gregor ltd), (space4environment)Gundula Prokop (Environment. Agency Austria), Mirko Gregor (space4environment). ETC/ULS consortium partners: Environment Agency Austria, ALTERRA Research Institute, Department of Remote Sensing, Lechner Non-profit Ltd space4environment, GISAT, The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), Universitat Autonònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Universidad de Málaga (UMA), Ecologic Cover photo © vadimgouida ‒ Fotolia.com Showing erosion control on a slope with straw sock catch, silt fence Legal notice The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the European Commission or other institutions of the European Union. Neither the European Environment Agency, the European Topic Centre on Urban Land and Soil Systems nor any person or company acting on behalf of the Agency or the Topic Centre is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. Copyright notice © European Topic Centre on Urban, Land and Soil Systems (2018) Reproduction is authorized provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. More information on the ETC-ULS is available on the Internet at http://uls.eionet.europa.eu/.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3 Land Use Element
    CHAPTER 3 Land Use Element CHAPTER 3 LAND USE ELEMENT Introduction The Land Use Element provides a framework to accommodate future development in an efficient and sustainable manner that is compatible with the character of unincorporated communities and the protection of valuable and sensitive natural resources. Currently, the County of San Diego is faced with both significant growth pressures and severe environmental constraints. While population continues to grow, the supply of land capable of supporting development continues to decrease. In accommodating this growth, the land use plan encourages the provision of diverse housing choices while protecting the established character of existing urban and rural neighborhoods. In general, the majority of new development—approximately 80 percent—is planned within the County Water Authority (CWA) boundary. This strategy coincides with the provision of imported water in San Diego County’s semi‐arid environment, and reflects the development pattern of the County’s largest unincorporated communities, which are located in the County’s western areas where demand for new development has and will continue to be greatest. The County’s unincorporated communities and rural lands, however, exhibit tremendous diversity. This General Plan recognizes and encourages these unique identities by providing sufficient flexibility within a countywide framework to respect the character of individual communities, neighborhoods, and landscapes. Focusing development in and around existing unincorporated communities allows the County to maximize existing infrastructure, provides for efficient service delivery, and strengthens town center areas while preserving the rural landscape that helps define the unique character of the unincorporated County. Purpose and Scope COUNTYWIDE The Land Use Element is a framework that provides maps, goals, and policies that guide planners, the general public, property owners, developers, and decision makers as to how lands are to be conserved and developed in the unincorporated County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Land Use on Biodiversity in the Framework of Life Cycle Assessment
    The Impact of Land Use on Biodiversity in the Framework of Life Cycle Assessment Master Thesis in Sustainable Development, March 2008 Clea Henzen Luisenstrasse 26, 8005 Zürich Master’s Degree in Sustainable Development, University of Basel, 99-718-213 Supervision: Prof. Dr. Patricia Holm Master’s Degree in Sustainable Development, University of Basel Dr. Thomas Koellner Institute for Environmental Decision, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich Abstract The production, use, and disposal of goods and services generate an impact on the different environmental components. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an important tool that aims at measuring the consequences of this impact in order to offer a base to governmental and non- governmental organizations and stakeholders in the process of environmental decision-making. Land use is one of the impact categories analyzed within the framework of LCA and influences the ecosystem quality of a region. Ecosystem quality is composed of specific characteristics such as biodiversity and ecosystem functions that are crucial towards the survival of mankind. This work assesses the biodiversity loss caused by land use activities in the Latin American tropical region and develops specific characterization factors applicable in the evaluation within LCA of anthropogenic environmental interventions. The vascular plants species are used as an indicator for the measuring of the whole biodiversity. This choice is supported by previous studies that point out the suitability of this organisms’ group for the assessment of land use impact on total species richness. In order to overcome the lack of data concerning the whole vascular plant species richness in the Latin American tropical region, the analysis is divided into two experimental parts The first part represents the meta-analysis of published empirical data concerning tree species richness in respect to different land use types.
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan Land Use Map (PDF)
    10TH STREET EAST STREET 10TH EAST STREET 20TH EAST STREET 30TH EAST STREET 40TH EAST STREET 50TH EAST STREET 60TH EAST STREET 70TH EAST STREET 80TH EAST STREET 90TH EAST 100TH STREET EAST STREET 110TH EAST 120TH STREET 90TH STREET WEST STREET 90TH WEST STREET 80TH WEST STREET 70TH WEST STREET 60TH WEST STREET 50TH WEST STREET 40TH WEST STREET 30TH WEST STREET 20TH WEST STREET 10TH AVENUE L AVE L-4 AVE L-8 AVE L-12 AVENUE M AVE M AVE M AVE M AVE M COLUMBIA WAY / AVENUE M OJAI HARTFORD CASTILLO OJ MIRAMAR LN DR A LN DR I D W R PRINCESSA SP-Antelope CIELO DR DR CABOCT CT W MONTANA DR W YUMA W DEVONSHIRE GILA CT K Valley BONITA DR 63RD ST W R E SONOMA RD 75TH ST W I AVE DR N C PICO WY S AVE M D I DANA DR TILTON DR - N CRISTALINO 4 Business Park R AVE M-4 G MIRKWOOD O N T CT F MUSCAT L O T 11TH ST W 12TH ST W RD A N A H C T R S ST T S I T M S AVE ST ST CHIANTI CT RICKIE LN PORTAVE OAK BARRELL CT MERRYVALE LN RETSINA ST SHERRY WY CHARDONNAY RIESLING ZINFANDEL DR BRETON PL DR AVE CIELO VISTA DR AVE M-8 KAREN AVE M-8 R R HICKORY D D GRANADA DR DR HICKORY ST M L ST I R E KINDA 62ND A E D N N PARKER R O O PARKER DR Z H M A Z C A Z T DR I S P E E 7 A N S V 6 N L I LINDA 70TH R O A 65TH T I O R WALNUT TA DR N ST S E N I W W T WY VENTANA DR R JACARANDA ST B SYCAMORE LN D AVE R AVE M-12 S A I LLE E P PO LN PINE AVE ALLEN R CT R A ALMOND JAIME REDWOOD AVE CT VISTA AVE M-14 12TH ST W MAX GODDE SEQUOIA ST LN MYRTLE CHESTNUT ST CYPRESS ST 11TH ST W MAPLE ST AVENUE N CRISPI LN AVE AVE N ELSDALE PL LAIDLAW LN AVE N AVE N AVE N AVE N AVENUE N Y NORTHRIDGE
    [Show full text]