DOCSLIB.ORG

Variational Autoencoders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Variational Autoencoders 10-708 Probabilistic Graphical Models Machine Learning Department School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Variational Autoencoders Matt Gormley Lecture 20 April 12, 2021 1 Reminders • Quiz 2 – Wed, Apr 14, during lecture time • HW5 Recitation – Wed, Apr. 14 at 7pm • Homework 5: Variational Inference – Out: Thu, Apr. 8 – Due: Wed, Apr. 21 at 11:59pm • Project Midway Milestones: – Midway Poster Session: Tue, Apr. 27 at 6:30pm – 8:30pm – Midway Executive Summary Due: Tue, Apr. 27 at 11:59pm – New requirement: must have baseline results 3 QUIZ 2 LOGISTICS 4 Quiz 2 • Time / Location – Time: In-Class Quiz Wed, Apr. 14 during lecture time – Location: The same Zoom meeting as lecture/recitation. Please arrive online early. – Please watch Piazza carefully for announcements. • Logistics – Covered material: Lecture 9 – Lecture 15 (and unavoidably some material from Lectures 1 – 8) – Format of questions: • Multiple choice • True / False (with justification) • Derivations • Short answers • Interpreting figures • Implementing algorithms on paper • Drawing – No electronic devices – You are allowed to bring one 8½ x 11 sheet of notes (front and back) 5 Quiz 2 • Advice (for before the exam) – Try out the Gradescope quiz-style interface in the “Fake Quiz” now available • Advice (for during the exam) – Solve the easy problems first (e.g. multiple choice before derivations) • if a problem seems extremely complicated you’re likely missing something – Don’t leave any answer blank! – If you make an assumption, write it down – If you look at a question and don’t know the answer: • we probably haven’t told you the answer • but we’ve told you enough to work it out • imagine arguing for some answer and see if you like it 6 Topics for Quiz 1 • Graphical Model • Exact Inference Representation – Three inference problems: – Directed GMs vs. (1) marginals Undirected GMs vs. (2) partition function Factor Graphs (3) most probably – Bayesian Networks vs. assignment Markov Random Fields vs. – Variable Elimination Conditional Random Fields – Belief Propagation (sum- • Graphical Model Learning product and max-product) – Fully observed Bayesian Network learning – Fully observed MRF learning – Fully observed CRF learning – Parameterization of a GM – Neural potential functions 7 Topics for Quiz 2 • Learning for Structure • Approximate Inference Prediction by Sampling – Structured Perceptron – Monte Carlo Methods – Structured SVM – Gibbs Sampling – Neural network – Metropolis-Hastings potentials – Markov Chains and • (Approximate) MAP MCMC Inference • Parameter Estimation – MAP Inference via MILP – Bayesian inference – MAP Inference via LP – Topic Modeling relaxation 8 Q&A 25 AUTOENCODERS 26 Unsupervised Pre-training Idea: (Two Steps) Use supervised learning, but pick a better starting point Train each level of the model in a greedy way 1. Unsupervised Pre-training – Use unlabeled data – Work bottom-up • Train hidden layer 1. Then fix its parameters. • Train hidden layer 2. Then fix its parameters. • … • Train hidden layer n. Then fix its parameters. 2. Supervised Fine-tuning – Use labeled data to train following “Idea #1” – Refine the features by backpropagation so that they become tuned to the end-task 27 Unsupervised Pre-training Unsupervised pre- training of the first layer: • What should it predict? • What else do we observe? Output • The input! … Hidden Layer This topology defines an Auto-encoder. … Input 28 Auto-Encoders Unsupervised pre- training of the first layer: • What should it predict? • What else do we … observe? “Input” ’ ’ ’ ’ • The input! … Hidden Layer This topology defines an Auto-encoder. … Input 29 Auto-Encoders Key idea: Encourage z to give small reconstruction error: – x’ is the reconstruction of x – Loss = || x – DECODER(ENCODER(x)) ||2 – Train with the same bacKpropagation algorithm for 2-layer Neural NetworKs with xm as both input and output. … “Input” ’ ’ ’ ’ DECODER: x’ = h(W’z) … Hidden Layer ENCODER: z = h(Wx) … Input 30 Slide adapted from Raman Arora Unsupervised Pre-training Unsupervised pre- training • Work bottom-up – Train hidden layer 1. Then fix its parameters. … “Input” ’ ’ ’ ’ – Train hidden layer 2. Then fix its parameters. … – … Hidden Layer – Train hidden layer n. Then fix its parameters. … Input 31 Unsupervised Pre-training Unsupervised pre- training • Work bottom-up ’ ’ … ’ – Train hidden layer 1. Then fix its parameters. … Hidden Layer – Train hidden layer 2. Then fix its parameters. … – … Hidden Layer – Train hidden layer n. Then fix its parameters. … Input 32 Unsupervised Pre-training ’ ’ … ’ Unsupervised pre- training … • Work bottom-up Hidden Layer – Train hidden layer 1. Then fix its parameters. … Hidden Layer – Train hidden layer 2. Then fix its parameters. … – … Hidden Layer – Train hidden layer n. Then fix its parameters. … Input 33 Unsupervised Pre-training Unsupervised pre- Output training … • Work bottom-up Hidden Layer – Train hidden layer 1. Then fix its parameters. … – Train hidden layer 2. Hidden Layer Then fix its parameters. – … … – Train hidden layer n. Hidden Layer Then fix its parameters. Supervised fine-tuning … Backprop and update all Input parameters 34 Deep Network Training Idea #1: 1. Supervised fine-tuning only Idea #2: 1. Supervised layer-wise pre-training 2. Supervised fine-tuning Idea #3: 1. Unsupervised layer-wise pre-training 2. Supervised fine-tuning 35 Comparison on MNIST • Results from Bengio et al. (2006) on MNIST digit classification task • Percent error (lower is better) 2.5 2.0 % Error % 1.5 1.0 Shallow Net Idea #1 Idea #2 Idea #3 (Deep Net, no- (Deep Net, (Deep Net, pretraining) supervised pre- unsupervised pre- training) training) 36 Comparison on MNIST • Results from Bengio et al. (2006) on MNIST digit classification tasK • Percent error (lower is better) 2.5 2.0 % Error % 1.5 1.0 Shallow Net Idea #1 Idea #2 Idea #3 (Deep Net, no- (Deep Net, (Deep Net, pretraining) supervised pre- unsupervised pre- training) training) 37 VARIATIONAL AUTOENCODERS 38 Why VAEs? • Autoencoders: – learn a low dimensional representation of the input, but hard to work with as a generative model – one of the key limitations of autoencoders is that we have no way of sampling from them! • Variational autoencoders (VAEs) – by contrast learn a continuous latent space that is easy to sample from! – can generate new data (e.g. images) by sampling from the learned generative model 39 Variational Autoencoders Graphical Model Perspective pɸ(x, z) • The DGM diagram shows that the VAE model is quite simple as a graphical model z ɸ (ignoring the neural net details that give rise to x) • Sampling from the model is easy: – Consider a DGM where x = gɸ(z/10 + z/||z||) x (i.e. we don’t use parameters ɸ) – Then we can draw samples of z and directly convert them to values x N • Key idea of VAE: define gɸ(z) as a neural net and z ~ Gaussian(0, I) learn ɸ from data 40 Figure from Doersch (2016) Variational Autoencoders Neural Network Perspective • We can view a variational autoencoder (VAE) as an autoencoder consisting of two neural networks • VAEs (as encoders) define two distributions: – encoder: qθ(z | x) – decoder: pɸ(x | z) • Parameters θ and ɸ are neural network parameters (i.e. θ are not the variational parameters) pɸ(x | z) qθ(z | x) z ɸ z x x θ N N 41 Variational Autoencoders Graphical Model Perspective • We can also view the VAE from the perspective of variational inference • In this case we have two distributions: – model: pɸ(z | x) – variational approximation: qλ=f(x; θ)(z | x) • We have the same model parameters ɸ • The variational parameters λ are a function of NN parameters θ pɸ(x, z) qλ(z | x) z ɸ z x x λ N N z ~ Gaussian(0, I) λ = f(x; θ) 42 Variational Autoencoders Whiteboard – Variational Autoencoder = VAE – VAE as a Probability Model – Parameterizing the VAE with Neural Nets – Variational EM for VAEs 43 Reparameterization Trick Decoder Decoder ( ) ( ) Sample from + * Encoder Encoder Sample from ( ) ( ) Figure 4: A training-time variational autoencoder implemented as a feed- forward neural network, where P(X z) is Gaussian. Left is without the | “reparameterization trick”, and right is with it. Red shows sampling opera- tions that are non-differentiable. Blue shows loss layers. The feedforward behavior of these networks is identical, but backpropagation can be applied only to the right network. 44 Figure from Doersch want(2016) to optimize is: EX D [log P(X) [Q(z X) P(z X)]] = ⇠ − D | k | EX D [Ez Q [log P(X z)] [Q(z X) P(z)]] . ⇠ ⇠ | − D | k (8) If we take the gradient of this equation, the gradient symbol can be moved into the expectations. Therefore, we can sample a single value of X and a single value of z from the distribution Q(z X), and compute the gradient of: | log P(X z) [Q(z X) P(z)] . (9) | − D | k We can then average the gradient of this function over arbitrarily many samples of X and z, and the result converges to the gradient of Equation 8. There is, however, a significant problem with Equation 9. Ez Q [log P(X z)] ⇠ | depends not just on the parameters of P, but also on the parameters of Q. However, in Equation 9, this dependency has disappeared! In order to make VAEs work, it’s essential to drive Q to produce codes for X that P can reliably decode. To see the problem a different way, the network described in Equa- tion 9 is much like the network shown in Figure 4 (left). The forward pass of this network works fine and, if the output is averaged over many samples of X and z, produces the correct expected value. However, we need to 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disentangled Variational Auto-Encoder for Semi-Supervised Learning
    Information Sciences 482 (2019) 73–85 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Information Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ins Disentangled Variational Auto-Encoder for semi-supervised learning ∗ Yang Li a, Quan Pan a, Suhang Wang c, Haiyun Peng b, Tao Yang a, Erik Cambria b, a School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China b School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore c College of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Semi-supervised learning is attracting increasing attention due to the fact that datasets Received 5 February 2018 of many domains lack enough labeled data. Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE), in particu- Revised 23 December 2018 lar, has demonstrated the benefits of semi-supervised learning. The majority of existing Accepted 24 December 2018 semi-supervised VAEs utilize a classifier to exploit label information, where the param- Available online 3 January 2019 eters of the classifier are introduced to the VAE. Given the limited labeled data, learn- Keywords: ing the parameters for the classifiers may not be an optimal solution for exploiting label Semi-supervised learning information. Therefore, in this paper, we develop a novel approach for semi-supervised Variational Auto-encoder VAE without classifier. Specifically, we propose a new model called Semi-supervised Dis- Disentangled representation entangled VAE (SDVAE), which encodes the input data into disentangled representation Neural networks and non-interpretable representation, then the category information is directly utilized to regularize the disentangled representation via the equality constraint.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencoder
    NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencoder Arash Vahdat, Jan Kautz NVIDIA {avahdat, jkautz}@nvidia.com Abstract Normalizing flows, autoregressive models, variational autoencoders (VAEs), and deep energy-based models are among competing likelihood-based frameworks for deep generative learning. Among them, VAEs have the advantage of fast and tractable sampling and easy-to-access encoding networks. However, they are cur- rently outperformed by other models such as normalizing flows and autoregressive models. While the majority of the research in VAEs is focused on the statistical challenges, we explore the orthogonal direction of carefully designing neural archi- tectures for hierarchical VAEs. We propose Nouveau VAE (NVAE), a deep hierar- chical VAE built for image generation using depth-wise separable convolutions and batch normalization. NVAE is equipped with a residual parameterization of Normal distributions and its training is stabilized by spectral regularization. We show that NVAE achieves state-of-the-art results among non-autoregressive likelihood-based models on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, CelebA 64, and CelebA HQ datasets and it provides a strong baseline on FFHQ. For example, on CIFAR-10, NVAE pushes the state-of-the-art from 2.98 to 2.91 bits per dimension, and it produces high-quality images on CelebA HQ as shown in Fig. 1. To the best of our knowledge, NVAE is the first successful VAE applied to natural images as large as 256×256 pixels. The source code is available at https://github.com/NVlabs/NVAE. 1 Introduction The majority of the research efforts on improving VAEs [1, 2] is dedicated to the statistical challenges, such as reducing the gap between approximate and true posterior distributions [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], formulating tighter bounds [11, 12, 13, 14], reducing the gradient noise [15, 16], extending VAEs to discrete variables [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23], or tackling posterior collapse [24, 25, 26, 27].
    [Show full text]
  • Explainable Deep Learning Models in Medical Image Analysis
    Journal of Imaging Review Explainable Deep Learning Models in Medical Image Analysis Amitojdeep Singh 1,2,* , Sourya Sengupta 1,2 and Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan 1,2 1 Theoretical and Experimental Epistemology Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (V.L.) 2 Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 May 2020; Accepted: 17 June 2020; Published: 20 June 2020 Abstract: Deep learning methods have been very effective for a variety of medical diagnostic tasks and have even outperformed human experts on some of those. However, the black-box nature of the algorithms has restricted their clinical use. Recent explainability studies aim to show the features that influence the decision of a model the most. The majority of literature reviews of this area have focused on taxonomy, ethics, and the need for explanations. A review of the current applications of explainable deep learning for different medical imaging tasks is presented here. The various approaches, challenges for clinical deployment, and the areas requiring further research are discussed here from a practical standpoint of a deep learning researcher designing a system for the clinical end-users. Keywords: explainability; explainable AI; XAI; deep learning; medical imaging; diagnosis 1. Introduction Computer-aided diagnostics (CAD) using artificial intelligence (AI) provides a promising way to make the diagnosis process more efficient and available to the masses. Deep learning is the leading artificial intelligence (AI) method for a wide range of tasks including medical imaging problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Backpropagation for Training Autoencoders Against Adversarial Attack
    1 Double Backpropagation for Training Autoencoders against Adversarial Attack Chengjin Sun, Sizhe Chen, and Xiaolin Huang, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—Deep learning, as widely known, is vulnerable to adversarial samples. This paper focuses on the adversarial attack on autoencoders. Safety of the autoencoders (AEs) is important because they are widely used as a compression scheme for data storage and transmission, however, the current autoencoders are easily attacked, i.e., one can slightly modify an input but has totally different codes. The vulnerability is rooted the sensitivity of the autoencoders and to enhance the robustness, we propose to adopt double backpropagation (DBP) to secure autoencoder such as VAE and DRAW. We restrict the gradient from the reconstruction image to the original one so that the autoencoder is not sensitive to trivial perturbation produced by the adversarial attack. After smoothing the gradient by DBP, we further smooth the label by Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), aiming for accurate and robust classification. We demonstrate in MNIST, CelebA, SVHN that our method leads to a robust autoencoder resistant to attack and a robust classifier able for image transition and immune to adversarial attack if combined with GMM. Index Terms—double backpropagation, autoencoder, network robustness, GMM. F 1 INTRODUCTION N the past few years, deep neural networks have been feature [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], or network structure [3], [14], I greatly developed and successfully used in a vast of fields, [15]. such as pattern recognition, intelligent robots, automatic Adversarial attack and its defense are revolving around a control, medicine [1]. Despite the great success, researchers small ∆x and a big resulting difference between f(x + ∆x) have found the vulnerability of deep neural networks to and f(x).
    [Show full text]
  • Generative Models
    Lecture 11: Generative Models Fei-Fei Li & Justin Johnson & Serena Yeung Lecture 11 - 1 May 9, 2019 Administrative ● A3 is out. Due May 22. ● Milestone is due next Wednesday. ○ Read Piazza post for milestone requirements. ○ Need to Finish data preprocessing and initial results by then. ● Don't discuss exam yet since people are still taking it. Fei-Fei Li & Justin Johnson & Serena Yeung Lecture 11 -2 May 9, 2019 Overview ● Unsupervised Learning ● Generative Models ○ PixelRNN and PixelCNN ○ Variational Autoencoders (VAE) ○ Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) Fei-Fei Li & Justin Johnson & Serena Yeung Lecture 11 - 3 May 9, 2019 Supervised vs Unsupervised Learning Supervised Learning Data: (x, y) x is data, y is label Goal: Learn a function to map x -> y Examples: Classification, regression, object detection, semantic segmentation, image captioning, etc. Fei-Fei Li & Justin Johnson & Serena Yeung Lecture 11 - 4 May 9, 2019 Supervised vs Unsupervised Learning Supervised Learning Data: (x, y) x is data, y is label Cat Goal: Learn a function to map x -> y Examples: Classification, regression, object detection, Classification semantic segmentation, image captioning, etc. This image is CC0 public domain Fei-Fei Li & Justin Johnson & Serena Yeung Lecture 11 - 5 May 9, 2019 Supervised vs Unsupervised Learning Supervised Learning Data: (x, y) x is data, y is label Goal: Learn a function to map x -> y Examples: Classification, DOG, DOG, CAT regression, object detection, semantic segmentation, image Object Detection captioning, etc. This image is CC0 public domain Fei-Fei Li & Justin Johnson & Serena Yeung Lecture 11 - 6 May 9, 2019 Supervised vs Unsupervised Learning Supervised Learning Data: (x, y) x is data, y is label Goal: Learn a function to map x -> y Examples: Classification, GRASS, CAT, TREE, SKY regression, object detection, semantic segmentation, image Semantic Segmentation captioning, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Infinite Variational Autoencoder for Semi-Supervised Learning
    Infinite Variational Autoencoder for Semi-Supervised Learning M. Ehsan Abbasnejad Anthony Dick Anton van den Hengel The University of Adelaide {ehsan.abbasnejad, anthony.dick, anton.vandenhengel}@adelaide.edu.au Abstract with whatever labelled data is available to train a discrimi- native model for classification. This paper presents an infinite variational autoencoder We demonstrate that our infinite VAE outperforms both (VAE) whose capacity adapts to suit the input data. This the classical VAE and standard classification methods, par- is achieved using a mixture model where the mixing coef- ticularly when the number of available labelled samples is ficients are modeled by a Dirichlet process, allowing us to small. This is because the infinite VAE is able to more ac- integrate over the coefficients when performing inference. curately capture the distribution of the unlabelled data. It Critically, this then allows us to automatically vary the therefore provides a generative model that allows the dis- number of autoencoders in the mixture based on the data. criminative model, which is trained based on its output, to Experiments show the flexibility of our method, particularly be more effectively learnt using a small number of samples. for semi-supervised learning, where only a small number of The main contribution of this paper is twofold: (1) we training samples are available. provide a Bayesian non-parametric model for combining autoencoders, in particular variational autoencoders. This bridges the gap between non-parametric Bayesian meth- 1. Introduction ods and the deep neural networks; (2) we provide a semi- supervised learning approach that utilizes the infinite mix- The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) [18] is a newly in- ture of autoencoders learned by our model for prediction troduced tool for unsupervised learning of a distribution x x with from a small number of labeled examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Variational Autoencoder for End-To-End Control of Autonomous Driving with Novelty Detection and Training De-Biasing
    Variational Autoencoder for End-to-End Control of Autonomous Driving with Novelty Detection and Training De-biasing Alexander Amini1, Wilko Schwarting1, Guy Rosman2, Brandon Araki1, Sertac Karaman3, Daniela Rus1 Abstract— This paper introduces a new method for end-to- Uncertainty Estimation end training of deep neural networks (DNNs) and evaluates & Novelty Detection it in the context of autonomous driving. DNN training has Uncertainty been shown to result in high accuracy for perception to action Propagate learning given sufficient training data. However, the trained models may fail without warning in situations with insufficient or biased training data. In this paper, we propose and evaluate Encoder a novel architecture for self-supervised learning of latent variables to detect the insufficiently trained situations. Our method also addresses training data imbalance, by learning a set of underlying latent variables that characterize the training Dataset Debiasing data and evaluate potential biases. We show how these latent Weather Adjacent Road Steering distributions can be leveraged to adapt and accelerate the (Snow) Vehicles Surface Control training pipeline by training on only a fraction of the total Command Resampled data dataset. We evaluate our approach on a challenging dataset distribution for driving. The data is collected from a full-scale autonomous Unsupervised Latent vehicle. Our method provides qualitative explanation for the Variables Sample Efficient latent variables learned in the model. Finally, we show how Accelerated Training our model can be additionally trained as an end-to-end con- troller, directly outputting a steering control command for an Fig. 1: Semi-supervised end-to-end control. An encoder autonomous vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders Full Text Available At
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000056 An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000056 Other titles in Foundations and Trends R in Machine Learning Computational Optimal Transport Gabriel Peyre and Marco Cuturi ISBN: 978-1-68083-550-2 An Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learning Vincent Francois-Lavet, Peter Henderson, Riashat Islam, Marc G. Bellemare and Joelle Pineau ISBN: 978-1-68083-538-0 An Introduction to Wishart Matrix Moments Adrian N. Bishop, Pierre Del Moral and Angele Niclas ISBN: 978-1-68083-506-9 A Tutorial on Thompson Sampling Daniel J. Russo, Benjamin Van Roy, Abbas Kazerouni, Ian Osband and Zheng Wen ISBN: 978-1-68083-470-3 Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000056 An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders Diederik P. Kingma Google [email protected] Max Welling University of Amsterdam Qualcomm [email protected] Boston — Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000056 Foundations and Trends R in Machine Learning Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders. Foundations and Trends R in Machine Learning, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 307–392, 2019. ISBN: 978-1-68083-623-3 c 2019 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Semi-Supervised Variational Autoencoders for Biomedical Relation Extraction
    Exploring Semi-supervised Variational Autoencoders for Biomedical Relation Extraction Yijia Zhanga,b and Zhiyong Lua* a National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA b School of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China Corresponding author: Zhiyong Lu ([email protected]) Abstract The biomedical literature provides a rich source of knowledge such as protein-protein interactions (PPIs), drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and chemical-protein interactions (CPIs). Biomedical relation extraction aims to automatically extract biomedical relations from biomedical text for various biomedical research. State-of-the-art methods for biomedical relation extraction are primarily based on supervised machine learning and therefore depend on (sufficient) labeled data. However, creating large sets of training data is prohibitively expensive and labor-intensive, especially so in biomedicine as domain knowledge is required. In contrast, there is a large amount of unlabeled biomedical text available in PubMed. Hence, computational methods capable of employing unlabeled data to reduce the burden of manual annotation are of particular interest in biomedical relation extraction. We present a novel semi-supervised approach based on variational autoencoder (VAE) for biomedical relation extraction. Our model consists of the following three parts, a classifier, an encoder and a decoder. The classifier is implemented using multi-layer convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and the encoder and decoder are implemented using both bidirectional long short-term memory networks (Bi-LSTMs) and CNNs, respectively. The semi-supervised mechanism allows our model to learn features from both the labeled and unlabeled data.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Variational Autoencoder: an Efficient Tool for PHM Frameworks
    Deep Variational Autoencoder: An Efficient Tool for PHM Frameworks Ryad Zemouri, Melanie Levesque, Normand Amyot, Claude Hudon, Olivier Kokoko To cite this version: Ryad Zemouri, Melanie Levesque, Normand Amyot, Claude Hudon, Olivier Kokoko. Deep Varia- tional Autoencoder: An Efficient Tool for PHM Frameworks. 2020 Prognostics and Health Man- agement Conference (PHM-Besançon), May 2020, Besancon, France. pp.235-240, 10.1109/PHM- Besancon49106.2020.00046. hal-02868384 HAL Id: hal-02868384 https://hal-cnam.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02868384 Submitted on 7 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Deep Variational Autoencoder: an efficient tool for PHM frameworks. Ryad Zemouri∗,Melanie´ Levesque´ y, Normand Amyoty, Claude Hudony and Olivier Kokokoy ∗Cedric-Lab, CNAM, HESAM universite,´ Paris (France), [email protected] y Institut de Recherche d’Hydro-Quebec´ (IREQ), Varennes, QC, J3X1S1 Canada Abstract—Deep learning (DL) has been recently used in several Variational Autoencoder applications of machine health monitoring systems. Unfortu- nately, most of these DL models are considered as black-boxes with low interpretability. In this research, we propose an original PHM framework based on visual data analysis. The most suitable space dimension for the data visualization is the 2D-space, Encoder Decoder which necessarily involves a significant reduction from a high- dimensional to a low-dimensional data space.
    [Show full text]
  • A Generative Model for Semi-Supervised Learning
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Creative Components Dissertations Fall 2019 A Generative Model for Semi-Supervised Learning Shang Da Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents Part of the Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons Recommended Citation Da, Shang, "A Generative Model for Semi-Supervised Learning" (2019). Creative Components. 382. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents/382 This Creative Component is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Creative Components by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Generative Model for Semi-Supervised Learning Shang Da A Creative Component submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science Program of Study Committee: Dr. Jin Tian, Major Professor Dr. Jia Liu, Committee Member Dr. Wensheng Zhang, Committee Member The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this dissertation. The Graduate College will ensure this dissertation is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2019 Copyright © Cy Cardinal, 2019. All rights reserved. ii TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Latent Property State Abstraction for Reinforcement Learning
    Latent Property State Abstraction For Reinforcement learning John Burden Sajjad Kamali Siahroudi Daniel Kudenko Centre for the Study Of Existential L3S Research Center L3S Research Center Risk Hanover Hanover University of Cambridge [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT the construction of RS functions. This would allow for reaping the Potential Based Reward Shaping has proven itself to be an effective benefits of reward shaping without the onus of manually encoding method for improving the learning rate for Reinforcement Learning domain knowledge or abstract tasks. algorithms — especially when the potential function is derived Our main contribution is a novel RL technique, called Latent from the solution to an Abstract Markov Decision Process (AMDP) Property State Abstraction (LPSA) that creates its own intrinsic encapsulating an abstraction of the desired task. The provenance reward function for use with reward shaping which can speed of the AMDP is often a domain expert. In this paper we introduce up the learning process of Deep RL algorithms. In our work we a novel method for the full automation of creating and solving an demonstrate this speed-up on the widely popular DQN algorithm AMDP to induce a potential function. We then show empirically [13]. Our method works by learning its own abstract representation that the potential function our method creates improves the sample of environment states using an auto-encoder. Then it learns an efficiency of DQN in the domain in which we test our approach. abstract value function over the environment before utilising this to increase the learning rate on the ground level of the domain KEYWORDS using reward shaping.
    [Show full text]