RECEl\f E:) Filing # 101772218 E-Filed 01/16/2020Via USPS CERTIFICATE 01:14:39 OF PM MAILING January 13, 2020 JAN 16 2020 In and for the U.S. STATE OF FL 5TH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH DISTRICT
Melvin-C :Lewis, Juanita-L Lewis, non war po
Living, sui juris Counter Cross Petitioners/ Plaintiffs
No. 5019-3465
v.
THE 0.0.C.; its U.S. Gov't. & STATE OF FL., INC's,
its MUNICIPAL LAKE COUNTY; 5th J/C& DCA TRIBUNALS; counter claim jury: yes
its B.A.R. subject DIANA M. JOHNSON, ESQ,
its CLERK/ COMP. B.A.R. subject GARY J. COONEY, ESQ.,
its (then NEIL KELLY);TAX ASSESSORS CAREY L. BAKER,
(then Ed Havill), MICHAEL PRESTRIDGE, its
TAX COLLECTOR DAVID W. JORDAN (then ROBERT KENNETH McKEE)
and Its LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE agents:
COUNTER RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS
Affidavit and Notice of Interlocutory Appeal for
certiorari review to the STATE OF FL SUPREME COURT RECEIVED, 01/16/202001:15:32 PM,Clerk,Supreme Court
1) We are Melvin and Juanita; herein 'we', 'us', 'our'; as non-persons, reasserting all prior
admission statements and confirmations; first being duly sworn under penalty of perjury
1 Via USPS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, 2020
In and for the U.S. STATE OF Fl 5TH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
under the laws of the dejure republic united States of America, pursuant to your 28
U.S.C. § 1746(1); still seeking a dejure competent court/ jury of competent jurisdiction,
depose, say and declare the following statements and informations are honest, factual,
true, correct and not meant to mislead, deceive nor be vexatious or frivolous;
2) We, having exhausted remedy, redress and recourse denied, reaffirm all prior
unrebutted recorded depositions, statements and declarations including evidence of
life / of being alive - already of record; where all abandoned fraud and false:
assumptions, presumptions, allegations and claims we are legal/ fictitious PERSONS
are abandoned; we dissent.
3) We are in January 11 2019 receipt of contraband commercial papers from FL SDCA and
actor agents' dismissing case no. SD19-3465 - our petition for writ of certiorari against
above counter DEFENDANTS - (disputing fraud & false claims and omissions); wherein
again clerk JOANNE P. SIMMONS and other reality inverted three panel SDCA B.A.R.
PERSONS actor- agents again claiming we, Juanita and Melvin: are not alive - but dead ' corporate paper legal fictions and that we did not comply with 'its' January 4th and l
January 20th orders also directed to legal fictitious PERSONS: JUNAITA L LEWIS and ! MELVIN CLEWIS, ens legis. I I t
2 I I Via USPS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, 2020
In and for the U.S. STATE OF FL 5TH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
4) We hereby submit this interlocutory appeal for certiorari review denied by this SDCA.
5) We object, oppose, challenge and do not grant consent to this 'order'/ 'judgment'.
6) We rebut, refute dispute and challenge the veracity of this wrongful 'order' and all
actors and B.A.R. subject agents' unfounded claims. r i 7) Said wrongful 'order' - hereby disputed and opposed- is also directed to and alleges we
are dead commercial paper legal fictions/ fictitious PERSONS JUANITA LEWIS and II t MELVIN C. LEWIS, ens legis like its reality inverted 'self' and thus is herein attached as t exhibits 1 and 2: refused, returned for frauds without dishonor for violations of 18 USC I §§ 241, 242, 513, 514, 1341, 1342 and including but not limited to § 1001-3 and marked t l consent not granted as these reality challenged actors and instrumentalities falsely I claiming we did not comply when in fact we did respond three times. t
8) Whereas this ( U.S.'s territory) FL 5th DCA appeal tribunal and actor/ agents fail to deny
it is the DEFENDANT/ APPELLEE; it therefore cannot be trusted to fairly adjudicate our
entitled certiorari and mandamus petitions to ultimately seek entitled emergency,
injunctive, declaratory and compensatory redress, relief, remedy and recourse by and
through our duly filed yet denied 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 - 1986 counter cross complaints
3 Via USPS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, 2020
In and for the U.S. STATE OF FL 5TH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
against it and its foreign superior entities.
9) This biased and 'order' unfairly allows its sister tribunal of LAKE COUNTY to continue
collecting its 18 U.S.C. § 1957 unjust enrichment coffers under threat, duress and
coercion by continued wars and terror tactics vi coactus. We dissent.
10) Notwithstanding our additionally related request for 28 USC § 1441 removal, remand
and reversal to the U.S. "original pendant jurisdiction" / " real party in and of interest"
as the only real party in/ of interest Rule 17(a) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MDFL OCALA DIVISION alleging it is not the respondeat superior over its subdivision and I subsidiary STATE OF FL and its LAKE COUNTY PERSONS.
t 11) The 5DCA requested $300.oo FRN's/iling fee discharged by UNITED STATES POSTAL I MONEY ORDER No. 25984211433 was disingenuously demanded; knowing 'its'/ 'their' I angry actors, agents and officers would steal those 300 FRN's alleging it required a three I B.A.R. agent/ subject panel, when clerk was/ is statutorily able to "dismiss" for alleged I j defects on its own acts not requiring such panel I I l I 12) We however did respond and comply three times as best we could, no evidence ; otherwise exists; we rebut and dispute all claims of noncompliance.
II I 4 I I t Via USPS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, 2020 l In and for the U.S. STATE OF FL 5TH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL I f 13) It is also hereby established and stipulated that within the past year this U.S. FL. SDCA
sent down to its sister tribunal LAKE COUNTY, FL 5th Jud Cir., our petition for writ of I mandamus, above DEFENDANTS LAKE COUNTY ''TAXING AUTHORITY" and its sister co I business partner 5th Jud. Cir. has ab initio failed to timely nor properly answer nor
counter prosecute, adjudicate, follow proper procedures and statutorily comply with
Florida legislative intent, thus also refused to provide proof of claim "it''/ "they'' [ THE
U.S. STATE OF FL. LAKE COUNTY TAXING AUTHORITY] has/ have a 11plain, speedy and
effective remedy ... " as alleged by 11it" and its respondeat superior U.S. DISTRICT COURT
and its sister co business subdivision LAKE COUNTY, FL.
14) We therefore request certiorari review from THE STATE OF FL SUPREME COURT against
this SDCA tribunal's wrongful and deprivational dismissal 'order' and refund of our
stolen filing fees including a fair and just certiorari review, remand and / or ultimate
reverse.
15) All FL SDCA PERSONS willfully fail(ed) to follow historical stare decisis established
precedents and acted with angry egregious bias and conflicts of interests to assure
success of its B.A.R. brethren and its/ their extortion and RICO by fiat and debt IOU
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES 18 U.S.C. § 1957 "income" streams. Ii !' i: !
5 Via USPS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, 2020 I In and for the U.S. STATE OF FL 5TH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL I I
16) These actors and agents' reality inverted claims we are dead fictitious persons, is forever barred and abandoned; as is said void ab initio dismissal 'order' employing l these void ab initio fraud and false claims and 'orders'.
17) We hereby, with merit and standing, request this FL SUPREME COURT certiorari review
of our denied SDCA cert review and its co business partner's mandamus refusal
dismissal. f
Our word is our bond. II l We await your joint and several interlocutory appeal processes notification.
IF Encl: Exhibits 1 and 2, 'order' and envelopes refused, returned for frauds without
dishonor, consent not granted. !£ I I l
It
Janita-L :Lewis '
by and without prejudice, UCC 1-308.
6 Via USPS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, 2020
In and for the U.S. STATE OF FL 5TH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Temporary Postal Mailing Location c/o PO Box 992 Groveland,
Florida RFD nondomestic, noncommercial.
Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.
Certification of service
We hereby certify on this 13th day of January 2020, that true and correct copies of this affidavit of Appeal for certiorari review by and to THE U.S. STATE OF FL SUPREME COURT in c/o SOS DUVAL
ST., TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399, was also mailed to l)THE U.S. STATE OF FL. 5TH JUD. CIR. TRIBUNAL in c/o 550 W. MAIN ST., TAVARES, FL 32778 and 2) THE U.S. STATE OF FL.'s ASST. LAKE COUNTY,
FL B.A.R. AGENT ATTORNEY DIANA M. JOHNSON, E SQUIRE for COUNTER CROSS DEFENDANTS in c/o 315 W. MAIN ST., TAVARES, FL 32778; all by USPS certificates of mailings. Receipts will be furnished upon specific request.
7 refused, returned for frauds via USPS 1st class CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, ~¢['
ry_h ,f, r 2 IJ f.l. rican non war powers act ~:'Qt'. ~.:;....::}
- --::::: -=-~ -- -- -::::-- - :::::- -- 18USC §§ 5~, 514 ~OUNTERFEIT SECU@tlES, - ~ ~ -: -=: FICTITIOUS; Al'lONS: - 1 :::::- ...J - and pro ILL's-.OF ATTTAINDERS C'\IQmz ~:5 Ow co>
0~. C) refused, returned for frauds via USPS 1st class CERTIFICATE OF MAILING January 13, 2020
Respondent. ------I DATE: January 08, 2020
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
ORDERED that Petitioners' Amended Petition for Writ of
Certiorari/Mandamus Review, filed January 3, 2020, is treated as a response to this
Court's Order of December 20, 2019. Upon consideration of Appellant's Response, it is further
ORDERED that the above-styled cause is dismissed for failure to comply with this Court's Orders of December 4, 2019, and December 20, 2019.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is (a true copy of) the original Court order.
Panel: Judges Evander, Cohen, and Grosshans CONSENT NOT GRANTED cc: Diana Johnson Melvin-C : Lewis Juanita-L: Lewis Hon. Larry Metz (2018-CA- 1906) Melvin-C : Lewis, Juanita-L : Lewis,
Living, sui juris Counter Cross Petitioners/ Plaintiffs
No.
from denied No. 5019-3465
v.
THE 0.O.C.; its U.S. Gov't. & STATE OF FL, INC's, its MUNICIPAL LAKE COUNTY; 5th J/C TRIBUNAL; counter claim jury demand : yes its 8.A.R. subject DIANA M. JOHNSON, ESQ., its CLERK/ COMP. 8.A.R. subject GARV J. COONEY, ESQ., its (then NEIL KELLV);TAX ASSESSORS CAREY L BAKER, (then Ed Havill), MICHAEL PRESTRIDGE, its TAX COLLECTOR DAVID W. JORDAN (then ROBERT KENNETH McKEE) and its LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE agents:
COUNTER CROSS RESPONDENTS / DEFENDANTS
Affidavit of Interlocutory Appeal opposing denied§ 1983 -1986
writ of certiorari and mandamus requests.
ADMISSION STATEMENTS
1 In and for the Florida Supreme Court
Melvin-C : Lewis, Juanlta-L : Lewis,
Living, sui juris Counter Cross Petitioners/ Plaintiffs
No.
from denied No. 5019-3465
v.
THE 0.O.C.; its U.S. Gov't. & STATE OF FL., INC's, its MUNICIPAL LAKE COUNTY; 5th J/C TRIBUNAL; counter claim jury demand: yes its B.A.R. subject DIANA M. JOHNSON, ESQ., its CLERK/ COMP. B.A.R. subject GARY J. COONEY, ESQ., its (then NEIL KELLY);TAX ASSESSORS CAREY L. BAKER,
(then Ed Havill), MICHAEL PRESTRIDGE, its
TAX COLLECTOR DAVID W. JORDAN (then ROBERT KENNETH McKEE) and its LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE agents:
COUNTER CROSS RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS
Affidavit of Interlocutory Appeal opposing denied § 1983 - 1986
writ of certiorari and mandamus requests.
ADMISSION STATEMENTS
1 living, sui juris Counter Cross Petitioners/ Plaintiffs
No.
from denied No. 5019-3465
v.
THE 0.O.C.; its U.S. Gov't. & STATE OF Fl., INC's, its MUNICIPAL LAKE COUNTY; 5th J/C TRIBUNAL; counter claim jury demand : yes its B.A.R. subject DIANA M. JOHNSON, ESQ., its CLERK/ COMP. B.A.R. subject GARY J. COONEY, ESQ., its (then NEIL KELLY);TAX ASSESSORS CAREY L. BAKER, (then Ed Havill), MICHAEL PRESTRIDGE, its TAX COLLECTOR DAVID W. JORDAN (then ROBERT KENNETH McKEE) and its LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE agents:
COUNTER CROSS RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS
Affidavit of Interlocutory Appeal opposing denied§ 1983 -1986
writ of certiorari and mandamus requests.
ADMISSION STATEMENTS
1 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
1) We, Melvin and Juanita; herein 'we', 'us', 'our'; as stipulated nonpersons, once again
first being duly sworn under penalty of perjury by the laws of the dejure union republic
United States of America, 1746(1); still seeking relief, remedy and recourse by a dejure
competent court and jury of competent Article Ill jurisdiction; herein depose, say and
declare the following sworn statements, and informations are honest, factual, true,
correct and not meant to mislead, deceive nor be vexatious or frivolous;
2) We, having exhausted all remedy and recourse denied, still seeking a dejure and
competent court of competent jurisdiction; reaffirm all prior unrebutted recorded
sworn depositions, statements and declarations including evidence of life/ of being
alive - already of record; and dissent all abandoned fraud and false: assumptions,
presumptions, allegations and claims.
3) We object, oppose, refute, dispute and challenge THE U.S. and your lowest and lower
tribunals' unreasonable dismissals of our 42 U.SC. §§ 1983 -1986 conspiracies and
deprivations of Rights under color of law counter cross actions; particularly your recent
lower FIFTH DISTRICT APPEAL TRIBUNAL dismissal of our duly requested certiorari
review, attached as Exhibit 1, emanating from its lower LAKE COUNTY, FL's 5th JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT TRIBUNAL claim of an unserved unjust dismissal of our entitled mandamus
review by wrongfully ignoring well settled, stipulated and established precedents
2 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
including proper standards of reviewing a non responsive answer "motion to dismiss".
4) Your SDCA wrongfully dismissed or certiorari review request, not on the merits of our
sworn affidavit declarations, statements, depositions, affidavits and evidence, but by an
alleged procedural defect we responded to and fixed three times.
5) Your sister FL SDCA clerk silently and wrongfully claimed it empaneled a three B.A.R.
agent panel of JUDICIAL PERSONS to dismiss what it could have statutorily done alone/
on its own and did wrongfully steal our $300.oo FRNs filing fee.
6) Your sister SDCA actors, agents and officers have wrongfully dismissed our certiorari
review by alleging we did not comply with its "orders" depriving us of relief from
opposed dismissal of our mandamus review requests. See exhibit 2.
7) We hereby oppose this "order'' and seek further entitled relief, remedy and recourse
denied once again.
Brief History
8) Our original counter complaints; since 2015 - inclusive of our challenges and rebuttals of
wrongfully being place on "The LAKE COUNTY, FL Tax Roll", originated in THE U.S.
DISTRICT COURT MDFL OCALA, FL; where 'it' wrongfully dismissed our 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983
3 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
-1986 by allowing its B.A.R. brethren's impermissible corporate 'unjust enrichment' and
by undenied admitted violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 4, 225, 241, 242; 872 extortions, § 912
False Impersonation, § 1957 Engaging in monetary transactions ( fictitious obligations
and counterfeit securities ) in property derived from specified unlawful activity and also
by tacit admissions of Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ACT; R.I.C.O. aka
Statutes at Large: 84 Stat. 922-3 aka 84 Stat. 941 U.S.C. created: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-
1968 counter claim Rule 13(a) actions against THE U.S., Its territory/ possession STATE
OF FL and its LAKE COUNTY "taxing authority'', acting void of a mutual contract, calling
situs or agreement, on its - now proven unfounded - claim of relief under 28 USC § 1341
aka THE TAX INJUNCTION Aa.
9) We researched, rebutted, opposed and then tested those theoretical claims and
submitted direct evidence which contradicts any and all claims that THE STATE OF FL
has a plain, speeding and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.
10) Our Rightfully entitled relief pursuant to your UCC 1-308, F.R.C.P. Rules: 52(a)(1)(2)(5)
and (6), 55(a)(b)(1){2) and (d), Rules 56, 57 "relief from judgment or order'', including
Doctrines of American Jurisprudence, Florida Rules of Judicial Administration and
F.R.C.P. Rules 60(b)(4) and 12(b)(6) relief have been unreasonably and unlawfully
denied. We dissent and seek just and due emergency, injunctive, declarative and
4 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
compensatory relief or otherwise deemed just and appropriate.
11) We are once again being wrongfully and willfully denied entitled relief by its sister SDCA
claims of noncompliance of an index attaching the 5 JC dismissal "order" we seek relief
from, but we have not been served any such order to forward to SDCA by its requested
"appendix'' with said "order'' not served. We did however provide a rebutted, refuted
and opposed copy of LAKE COUNTY, FL DEFENDANTS counsel's proposed order for
grant of its/ their motion to dismiss mandamus review.
12) We have thus proven COUNTER DEFENDANTS including FL 5TH DCA as DEFENDANT in
these counter cross tort claim actions, have collectively, joint and severally failed to
perform its constitutional contractual duties, failing to state a FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) claim
upon which relief can be granted.
13) Thus, all historically established precedents, stare decisis doctrines and authoritative
legislative intent have been and continue to be besmirched with comfortable and
favorable -to-its-B.A.R.-brethren's improprieties, biases; unfairly and disfavor-ably
ignored and set aside to continuously deprive us our unwaived, protected, guaranteed
and inherent creator endowed Rights accomplished comfortably under undenied
egregious improprieties, bias, conflicts of interests accomplished under color of law so
5 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
that their massive commercial schemes and coffers can be maintained, to our harm,
injury and detriment.
14) It is further recorded and stipulated that within the past year this U.S. FL. SDCA sent
down to its sister tribunal LAKE COUNTY, FL 5th Jud Cir., our petition for writ of
mandamus against above DEFENDANTS LAKE COUNTY ''TAXING AUTHORITY".
15) Its 5th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL has/ have admittedly ab initio
failed to timely answer nor counter prosecute, adjudicate, follow proper procedures and
legislative intent, thus also refused to provide proof of claim "it"/ "they" [ THE U.S.
STATE OF FL. LAKE COUNTY TAXING AUTHORITY] has/ have an alleged "plain, speedy
and effective remedy.•. 11 as alleged by "i~ and its respondeat superior U.S. DISTRICT
COURT and its sister co business subdivision STATE OF Fl and LAKE COUNTY, FL
operating ultra vires as one.
16) These tribunals cannot be trusted to ever rule against itself nor one another. Any
complete, fair and just review must come from without these challenged jurisfictions
which fail{ed} to statutorily and legislatively perform and provide proof of its claims.
17) We have also previously, now and forever dispute{d), rebut, refute and challenge any
and all [silent] claims, allegations, presumptions and assumptions, that we; as stipulated
private secured party creditors and undenied breathing, flesh and blood living In ltenere
6 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
sojourning souls - have somehow: 1) fraudulently and falsely agreed to be/ become -
our very - duly registered common law copyrighted by us - legal fictions MELVIN C.
LEWIS and JUANITA LEWIS, ens legis, 2) agreed to be compelled to perform ( reserving
all Rights without prejudice under your UCC 1-308 void of any produced contract, 3) to
be surety for these fictitious PERSONS and 4) and to somehow perjure ourselves by
claiming we are/ have become commercial, paper only - statutory DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA and its U.S. or STATE OF FL corporate: "SURETY", "CHATTEL", EMPLOYEES:,
"FRANCHISEES", "CITIZENS" I "TAXPAYERS", "RESIDENTS" I ''VOTERS" I "PERSONS" I
"LEGAL FICTIONS", "DRIVERS", "PUBLIC OFFICERS" or any of its other U.S. [ acting ultra
11ires, beyond 'its' ten mile square corporate charter and border] 'quasi-government:
CITIZENS, 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS, INDIVIDUALS, PERSONS, AGENTS, OFFICERS,
EMPLOYEES, etc.
certiorari review terms and conditions:
18) Once again, of, for and on the stipulated and res judicata record; there exists no
evidence we ever knowingly, willingly appeared before any court, tribunal, corporation,
government { as is required } to willfully nor intentionally surrender, relinquish, waive
nor abandon our dejure private secured part creditor - Sovereign American - In ltenere
status and standing to THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, nor its federal corporation
'government' aka THE U.S., etc. ( per 28 USC§ 3002 (15); nor to any of its territorial: r ! f' subsidiary/ subdivision actors, agents, instrumentalities; including but not limited to If f ;
7 I l Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020 I In and for the Florida Supreme Court I f ~ E any of its commercial or corporate departments, offices, agencies COUNTER CROSS If TORT CLAIM COMPLAINT DEFENDANTS { as is required }; See City of Minneapolis v.
Reum. 56 F. 576, C.C.A. 8 {Minn.1893}, Afroyim v. Rusk,387 U.S. 253, 18 l.Ed. 2d 757, 87
S.Ct. 1660 (1967). Kitchens v. Steele. 112 F. Supp. 383, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox. 298
U.S. 193 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773 and also Lanz v. Randall. C.C. Minn. 1876. 14 F. Cas.
1131. 24 Pitts. L.J. 681 No. 8080.
19) Therefore, it is further stipulated that the governing law of this counter cross private
contract is the agreement of the "parties" and thus any and all such attempted reality
inverted claims in the alteration of our lawful names, 'case' captions, headings, styles, or
void judgment 'orders' addressed to such paper fictions are (t)hereby and forever
abandoned.
20) We asked that if are/ were somehow incorrect; any actor, agent, officer; B.A.R. or
otherwise, at any level at any time within ten days (10), can respond by contradictory
sworn affidavit to point for point rebut and provide valid evidence and proof of claim
otherwise. Stipulated failure to do so did constitute a nihil dicit default judgment and
failure to cure said default did continue to and forever abandon and bar any claim in any
tribunal, court or venue. We received no response.
8 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
r 21) We therefore submit the foregoing petition for a writ of certiorari for ultimate reversal I against FL SDCA and joint and several COUNTER CROSS RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS. I 22) All PERSONS must use our proper lawful names Melvin-C :Lewis and Juanita-L :Lewis and
not convert us into fictitious PERSONS; JUANITA L LEWIS or MELVIN C. LEWIS, ens legis.
23) That any unsubstantiated claim we are fictitious persons, is forever barred and
abandoned; if used any order will be void ab initio.
24) Acceptance of stipulations we are Juanita and Melvin, that we are alive, compos mentis
to state our Rightful claims, are entitled to all past, present and future relief sought and
are entitled with proper status and standing.
Conclusion
25) We hereby Rightfully request certiorari/ mandamus review and relief; emergency,
injunctive, declaratory and whatever just remedy, recourse un-bias-ly deemed just and
appropriate.
Our words of truth is our bond.
9 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.
We await acknowledgement, acceptance and a procedural/ fee requirements reply.
Exhibit 1, Certiorari review dismissal "ORDER".
Exhibit 2, Mandamus review form proposed motion to dismiss.
All Rights reserved, without prejudice UCC 1-308
/ Melvin-C: Lewis
Temporary Postal Mailing Location
c/o PO Box 992
Groveland, Florida RFD
nondomestic, noncommercial
10 Via USPS CERTIFIED RRR MAIL No. 70190160000079935256 January 13, 2020
In and for the Florida Supreme Court
Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.
Certification of service
We hereby certify on this 13th day of January 2020, that true and correct copies of this affidavit and petition for FL Supreme Court review and reversal of prior certiorari/ mandamus dismissals have been mailed to joint and several COUNTER CROSS RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS; 1) THE
U.S. STATE OF FL INC's 5thDCA c/o 300 s. BEACH ST, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114 USA, 2) THE U.S.
STATE OF FL INC's LAKE COUNTY offices, agencies, actor/ agents and officers of/ and its 5TH JUD.
CIR. TRIBUNAL c/o 550 W. MAIN ST., TAVARES, FL 32778 and 3) THE U.S. STATE OF FL INC's LAKE
COUNTY, FL B.A.R. AGENT-ASST. ATTORNEY DIANA M. JOHNSON, ESQUIRE at/ in c/o 315 W.
MAIN ST., TAVARES, FL 32778; all by 1st class USPS certificates of mailings. Proof of service mailing receipts will be furnished upon specific request. ..,-_ ~-~...)('&C~l:i~ JX~,L-- e -~ IJif
11 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
MELVIN-C :LEWIS AND JUANITA-L :LEWIS,
Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 5D19-3465
LAKE COUNTY, INC. AND OFFICERS GARY J. COONEY, CLERK, NEIL KELLY, CAREY L. BAKER, MICHAEL PRESTRIDGE, ED HAVIL, TAX ASSESSORS, AND ROBERT KENNETH MCKEE, TAX COLLECTOR,
Respondent. ______/
DATE: January 08, 2020
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
ORDERED that Petitioners’ Amended Petition for Writ of
Certiorari/Mandamus Review, filed January 3, 2020, is treated as a response to this
Court’s Order of December 20, 2019. Upon consideration of Appellant’s Response, it is further
ORDERED that the above-styled cause is dismissed for failure to comply with this Court’s Orders of December 4, 2019, and December 20, 2019.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is (a true copy of) the original Court order.
Panel: Judges Evander, Cohen, and Grosshans cc: Diana Johnson Melvin-C : Lewis Juanita-L : Lewis Hon. Larry Metz (2018-CA- 1906) 5DCA CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the instrument(s) filed in this office.
Witness my hand and official seal this January 16, 2020 .
Joanne P. Simmons, Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal.
By: /s/ Kathy Palmere
KERRY I. EVANDER CHIEF JUDGE
RICHARD B. ORFINGER SANDRA B. WILLIAMS JAY P. COHEN CLERK F. RAND WALLIS BRIAN D. LAMBERT JAMES A. EDWARDS CHARLES R. CRAWFORD ERIC J. EISNAUGLE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL MARSHAL JOHN M. HARRIS FIFTH DISTRICT JAMIE R. GROSSHANS 300 SOUTH BEACH STREET MEREDITH L. SASSO DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA 32114 DAN TRAVER JUDGES (386) 947-1500 COURT (386) 255-8600 CLERK
January 16, 2020
Hon. John A. Tomasino, Clerk Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Re: Lewis & Lewis Appeal No. 5D19-3465 v. Trial Court No 2018-CA-1906 Lake County & Officers et al Trial Court Judge: HON. LARRY METZ
Dear Hon. Tomasino:
Attached is a certified copy of the Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 9.120, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, along with a copy of this Court's opinion or decision relevant to this case. The filing fee prescribed by Section 25.241(3), Florida Statutes, was received by this court and is also attached. The filing fee prescribed by Section 25.241(3), Florida Statutes, was not received by this Court. Petitioner/Appellant has been previously determined insolvent by this Circuit Court or our court.
No filing fee is required because: Summary Appeal (Rule 9.141) Unemployment Appeals Commission Habeas Corpus (Petition- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Criminal) Juvenile case Other ______
Sincerely, SANDRA B. WILLIAMS, CLERK
By: /s/ Kathy Palmere Deputy Clerk
Attachments cc: Melvin C. Lewis, Juanita L. Lewis, Diana Johnson, John Tomasino
FAX NUMBER (386) 947-1562 E MAIL ADDRESS [email protected]