DOCSLIB.ORG

JP 3-32, Command and Control of Joint Maritime Operations, 8 June

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JP 3-32, Command and Control of Joint Maritime Operations, 8 June Joint Publication 3-32 OF NT TH E E W M I S E' L L H D T E F T E N A R D R A M P Y E D • • U A N C I I T R E E D M S A T F AT E S O Joint Maritime Operations 08 June 2018 Incorporating Change 1 20 September 2021 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides fundamental principles and guidance for joint maritime operations. It describes the maritime domain; addresses considerations for establishing a joint force maritime component commander and attendant command relationships; and provides principles and guidance to plan, execute, and assess joint maritime operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces of the United States in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, the National Guard Bureau, and combat support agencies. b. This doctrine constitutes official advice concerning the enclosed subject matter; however, the judgment of the commander is paramount in all situations. i Preface c. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the CJCS, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance. Commanders of forces operating as part of a multinational (alliance or coalition) military command should follow multinational doctrine and procedures ratified by the United States. For doctrine and procedures not ratified by the US, commanders should evaluate and follow the multinational command’s doctrine and procedures, where applicable and consistent with US law, regulations, and doctrine. For the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: KEVIN D. SCOTT Vice Admiral, USN Director, Joint Force Development ii JP 3-32 (CH 1) SUMMARY OF CHANGES REVISION OF JOINT PUBLICATION 3-32 DATED 07 AUGUST 2013 • Changes title from Command and Control for Joint Maritime Operations. • Revises scope statement. • Revises discussion of composite warfare and adds a figure on composite warfare commander organization. • Revises command and control considerations for specific maritime operations. • Adds a paragraph on seapower essential functions. • Adds figure on operational employment constructs for amphibious ready groups and marine expeditionary units (aggregated, disaggregated, distributed). • Removes discussion of global fleet station, Maritime Civil Affairs and Security Training Command, and maritime expeditionary security force. • Revises the discussion on maritime domain awareness. • Enhances discussion on assessment. • Enhances consistency among other doctrinal publications and Department of Defense (DOD) and other United States Government policies. • Modifies, adds, and removes terms and definitions from the DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. iii Summary of Changes Intentionally Blank iv JP 3-32 (CH 1) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION General ................................................................................................................... I-1 General Approach to Command and Control .......................................................... I-2 Seapower Essential Functions ................................................................................. I-3 Joint Maritime Operations ...................................................................................... I-4 Maritime Domain ................................................................................................... I-5 CHAPTER II ORGANIZING FOR JOINT MARITIME OPERATIONS General Organizational Options ............................................................................. II-1 Component Employment Considerations ............................................................... II-3 Command Relationships and Responsibilities ........................................................ II-6 Organizing and Manning the Component Headquarters ....................................... II-11 Task Organization of Subordinate Forces ............................................................ II-13 Navy Composite Warfare Doctrine ...................................................................... II-14 Marine Air-Ground Task Force............................................................................ II-16 Multinational Considerations ............................................................................... II-16 Supported Maritime Commander Considerations ................................................. II-17 Supporting Maritime Commander Considerations................................................ II-17 CHAPTER III PLANNING JOINT MARITIME OPERATIONS Maritime Planning Processes and Products ........................................................... III-1 Integration with Joint Planning Process ................................................................ III-2 Organizing the Operational Area .......................................................................... III-2 Other General Planning Considerations ................................................................ III-3 Assessment ......................................................................................................... III-16 Multinational Participation ................................................................................. III-18 CHAPTER IV COMMAND AND CONTROL AND OTHER OPERATIONAL-LEVEL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPECIFIC MARITIME OPERATIONS General ................................................................................................................. IV-1 Surface Warfare .................................................................................................... IV-1 Air and Missile Defense ....................................................................................... IV-5 v Table of Contents Antisubmarine Warfare....................................................................................... IV-10 Mine Warfare ..................................................................................................... IV-14 Strike Warfare .................................................................................................... IV-16 Amphibious Operations ...................................................................................... IV-17 Naval Surface Fire Support ................................................................................. IV-17 Commander’s Communication Synchronization ................................................. IV-18 Maritime Interception Operations ....................................................................... IV-19 Maritime Security Operations ............................................................................. IV-22 Maritime Homeland Defense and Defense Support of Civil Authorities .............. IV-23 Global Maritime Partnerships and Security Cooperation ..................................... IV-24 Sea-Based Operations ......................................................................................... IV-25 Counterdrug Operations ...................................................................................... IV-27 Noncombatant Evacuation Operations ................................................................ IV-28 Protection of Shipping ........................................................................................ IV-28 Maritime Pre-Positioning Force Operations ........................................................ IV-30 Foreign Humanitarian Assistance ....................................................................... IV-30 Maritime Operational Threat Response ............................................................... IV-31 Riverine Operations ............................................................................................ IV-32 APPENDIX A Detainee Operations at Sea ..................................................................... A-1 B References .............................................................................................. B-1 C Administrative Instructions ..................................................................... C-1 GLOSSARY Part I Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms.............................................GL-1 Part II Terms and Definitions ..........................................................................GL-5 FIGURE I-1 Legal Boundaries of the Oceans
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
    ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Publication Until Released by the House Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL LUKE M. McCOLLUM, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVY RESERVE BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL YEAR 2021 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE March 3, 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 NAVY RESERVE FORCE ................................................................................................................................... 5 Commander, Navy Reserve Forces Command (CNRFC) ........................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Air Forces Reserve (CNAFR) ...................................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Information Force Reserve (CNIFR) .......................................................................... 6 Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) ........................................................................................ 7 PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Civilian Skills .............................................................................................................................................. 7
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Publication 0-2
    Joint Publication 0-2 IQ 0.- x. y a. ACLU-RDI 250 p.1 DODD0A-001597 The enduring theme, "joint warfare is team warfare," is an attitude based on the foundation of joint doctrine that is universally understood and practiced. This team approach ensures the most effective employment of US forces for joint warfare. If we are to continue to improve the structure of US forces for ioint warfare, everyone must be involved. Capstone publications Joint Warfare of the Armed Forces of the United States and this publication, Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF), provide the foundation for all the joint publications. Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF) provides the basic doctrine and policy governing the unified direction of forces and discusses the functions of the Department of Defense and its major components. This revision represents the evolution in US warfighting guidance since the last edition, serves as the policy document for all command relationships and other authorities directed by law, and clarifies these relationships. This publication also sets forth the concepts, relationships, and processes necessary for unified action of joint, interagency, and multinational operations and specifies fundamental principles and concepts for joint operations. The nature of modem warfare demands that we fight as a team. Unified action resulting from clear command relationships and unity of effort is crucial to making this possible. Commanders must ensure the widest distribution and application of this and other supporting joint publications in order to enable success in joint force employment. HENRY H. SHELTON Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff ACLU-RDI 250 p.2 PREFACE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchronizing Airpower and Firepower in the Deep Battle
    After you have read the research report, please give us your frank opinion on the contents. All comments—large or small, complimentary or caustic—will be gratefully appreciated. Mail them to CADRE/AR, Building 1400, 401 Chennault Circle, Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6428. Synchronizing Airpower and Laughbaum Firepower in the Deep Battle Thank you for your assistance COLLEGE OF AEROSPACE DOCTRINE, RESEARCH, AND EDUCATION AIR UNIVERSITY Synchronizing Airpower and Firepower in the Deep Battle R. KENT LAUGHBAUM Lt Col, USAF CADRE Paper Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6610 January 1999 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii CADRE Papers CADRE Papers are occasional publications sponsored by the Airpower Research Institute of Air University’s College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education (CADRE). Dedicated to promoting understanding of air and space power theory and application, these studies are published by the Air University Press and broadly distributed to the US Air Force, the Department of Defense and other governmental organizations, leading scholars, selected institutions of higher learning, public policy institutes, and the media. All military members and civilian employees assigned to Air University are invited to contribute unclassified manuscripts. Manuscripts should deal with air and/or space power history, theory, doctrine or strategy, or with joint or combined service matters bearing on the application of air and/or space power.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Air Station Whibey Island from MCAS Kaneohe Bay
    COVER INSERTED HERE 1 PLANESIDE Cover Photo The ‘Skinny Dragons” of VP-4 began arriving home to NAS Whidbey Island in early September after a six-month deployment to the U.S. 4th and 6th Fleet areas of responsibility during which they provided support to Operation Inherent Resolve and Operation Martillo. VP-4 is the first of three CPRW-2 squadrons to execute a homeport change to Naval Air Station Whibey Island from MCAS Kaneohe Bay. Photo Credit: Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Alexander Cole. PLANESIDE is a quarterly online newsletter published by the Maritime Patrol Association, Inc. Copyright 2012-2016. P.O. Box 147 Orange Park, FL 32067 [email protected] * www.maritimepatrolassociation.org 2 3 PLANESIDE Features:In this Issue Welcome from the President 5 CPRG: Checking on Station 8 In the News: VP-8 Aids in Rescue of Tropical Storm Survivors 13 Community: NAS Whidbey Island Hosts Weeklong COG, Concludes with P-8 Media Day 17 Building 514 Officially On Line 20 Midshipmen Learn from the ‘Tridents,’ ‘Spartans’ and Other Commands 22 No Fox Like a Home Fox 23 ‘Red Lancers’ Employ Harpoon in RIMPAC 2016 25 ‘Pelicans’ Participate in Northern Coast 2016 26 Rear Adm. Cozad Visits NAS Whidbey Island Amid a Sea of Change 27 VP-8 Tops Off Successful Deployment with Jacksonville Homecoming 29 ‘Mad Fox’ Iwo Jima Trip 32 Grey Knights Dominate in Valiant Shield 2016 34 VP-26 Takes On ‘Operation Steel Trident’ 36 RIMPAC Provides Unique Opportunities for Training 37 ‘War Eagles’ Strive for Nothing but Excellence 40 VP-5 Participates
    [Show full text]
  • Commander Commodore José António Mirones Spanish Navy Commander of Standing Nato Maritime Group Two (Snmg1)
    COMMANDER COMMODORE JOSÉ ANTÓNIO MIRONES SPANISH NAVY COMMANDER OF STANDING NATO MARITIME GROUP TWO (SNMG1) José António Mirones was born in 1965 and joined the Portuguese Navy Naval Academy in 1983, graduating with the class of 88. After Fleet training, including involvement in disaster relief in the North Sea, in the aftermath of Piper Alfa oil rig disaster, and exchange with the United States Navy, in USS Joseph Hewes, his early years were spent at sea as a bridge watch-keeper, carrying out fishery protection and maritime securityoperations. Principal Warfare Officer in several frigates, was also Head of Department (Operations) and Executive officer with operational deployments to the Adriatic, supporting EU and NATO embargo operations; Mediterranean, namely Operation Enduring Freedom, in the wake of September 11th; Baltic; Artic Ocean and wider Atlantic. He completed the specialist ASW´s course in 1999. Took command of the frigate Bartolomeu Dias, in January 2009, as her first Commanding Officer. Promoted to Captain, acted as CTG (EUROMARFOR TG) for two occasions and, more recently, as Commodore, was the force commander for the EU naval operation ATALANTA, in the Indian Ocean. His staff appointments have included two tours at the Naval Staff (Plans and Policy and External Affairs Division). His last shore assignment was as Military Assistant to the Chief of the Defence Staff. José António Mirones personal decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Cross as well as various campaign ribbons and foreign medals. @NATOMaritimeCommand @NATO_MARCOM @NATO HQ MARCOM Allied Maritime Command I Public Affairs OfficeI [email protected] I www.mc.nato.int.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 R.A.N. SHIPS OVERSEAS to JUNE 194 0 URING the First Ten Months Of
    CHAPTER 4 R.A.N. SHIPS OVERSEAS TO JUNE 194 0 URING the first ten months of the war, those Australian ships not D retained on the home station were employed in Imperial dispositions in widely separated areas . The first six months found Perth in Central American waters, mainly engaged in the dual task of protecting trade — especially the important tanker traffic in the Caribbean—and preventin g the escape of German merchant ships sheltering in neutral ports of th e islands and the Isthmus . Last of the three expansion-program cruiser s acquired from Britain, she had commissioned at Portsmouth on the 29th June 1939 as H .M.A. Ship under "Fighting Freddie " Farncomb, a studious , coolly-efficient officer whose nickname, bestowed during the war, reflected the confidence and esteem of the lower deck . Perth sailed from Portsmouth on the 26th July for Australia via th e Panama Canal, and reached New York, where she represented Australi a at the World Fair, on the 4th August. On the 21st of the month, after twelve days of American hospitality, she arrived at Kingston, Jamaica, an d was to have sailed for Panama on the 23rd, but in the early morning o f that date Farncomb received a signal sent to the Admiralty by the Com- mander-in-Chief, America and West Indies—Vice-Admiral Meyrick' — asking that Perth might remain on the station . Farncomb thereupon can- celled his sailing arrangements, thus anticipating an Admiralty signa l received later in the day directing him to "return Kingston and awai t further orders " .
    [Show full text]
  • China's Far Sea's Navy: the Implications Of
    China’s Far Sea’s Navy: The Implications of the “Open Seas Protection” Mission Revised and Updated April 2016 A Paper for the “China as a Maritime Power” Conference CNA Arlington, Virginia Michael McDevitt Senior Fellow Introduction China has not yet revealed the details of how large a navy it feels it needs, but Beijing has been remarkably transparent in disclosing its overall maritime ambitions, which depend first and foremost on a strong PLAN. Three years ago, the PLA explicitly addressed the issue of becoming a “maritime power”: China is a major maritime as well as land country. The seas and oceans provide immense space and abundant resources for China’s sustainable development, and thus are of vital importance to the people's well-being and China’s future. It is an essential national development strategy to exploit, utilize and protect the seas and oceans, and build China into a maritime power. It is an important duty for the PLA to resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests. (Emphasis added.)1 Two years later, the PLA was even more specific in addressing its far seas ambitions. These ambitions were dictated by Beijing’s belief that it must be able to protect its vital sea lanes and its many political and economic overseas interests—including, of course, the millions of Chinese citizens working or travelling abroad. This was explicitly spelled out in the 2015 Chinese Defense White Paper, entitled China’s Military Strategy.2 According to the white paper:3 1 See State Council Information Office, The Diversified Employment of China’s Armed Forces, April 2013, Beijing.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibious Warfare: Theory and Practice* Tomoyuki Ishizu
    Amphibious Warfare: Theory and Practice* Tomoyuki Ishizu Introduction In December 2013, the Government of Japan released its first “National Security Strategy” and announced the “National Defense Program Guidelines for FY 2014 and beyond.” The new Guidelines set forth the buildup of “dynamic joint defense force,” calling for a sufficient amphibious operations capability by means of amphibious vehicles and tilt-rotor aircraft, for example, to cope with potential enemy attack against any of Japan’s remote islands. This paper analyzes amphibious warfare from a historical viewpoint to show its major framework and concept. It is no wonder that the scale and form of amphibious operations may differ significantly among states depending on their national strategy, status of military power in the national strategy, military objectives, and historical or geographical conditions. The reason is that the national strategy, which is prescribed according to the national history, geography, culture and more, determines the role of the nation’s military force and way of fighting. With all these facts taken into account, this paper attempts to propose a general framework for examining amphibious warfare, especially for amphibious operations, and to sort out ideas and terms used in such operations. 1. What are Amphibious Operations? (1) The issues surrounding their definition The first issue that one inevitably encounters in examining amphibious operations is the ambiguity surrounding their definition. Without a uniform understanding of the meaning of amphibious operations and of their associated concepts and terminologies, the actual execution of operations will likely be met with difficulties. Nevertheless, a uniform understanding or a “common language” for the associated concepts and terminologies has not been arrived at, not even in the United States, which has conducted many amphibious operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Commodore John Barry
    Commodore John Barry Day, 13th September Commodore John Barry (1745-1803) a native of County Wexford, Ireland was a Continental Navy hero of the American War for Independence. Barry’s many victories at sea during the Revolution were important to the morale of the Patriots as well as to the successful prosecution of the War. When the First Congress, acting under the new Constitution of the United States, authorized the raising and construction of the United States Navy, President George Washington turned to Barry to build and lead the nation’s new US Navy, the successor to the Continental Navy. On 22 February 1797, President Washington conferred upon Barry, with the advice and consent of the Senate, the rank of Captain with “Commission No. 1,” United States Navy, effective 7 June 1794. Barry supervised the construction of his own flagship, the USS UNITED STATES. As commander of the first United States naval squadron under the Constitution, which included the USS CONSTITUTION (“Old Ironsides”), Barry was a Commodore with the right to fly a broad pennant, which made him a flag officer. Commodore John Barry By Gilbert Stuart (1801) John Barry served as the senior officer of the United States Navy, with the title of “Commodore” (in official correspondence) under Presidents George Washington, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. The ships built by Barry, and the captains selected, as well as the officers trained, by him, constituted the United States Navy that performed outstanding service in the “Quasi-War” with France, in battles with the Barbary Pirates and in America’s Second War for Independence (the War of 1812).
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of a “Fleet in Being” in Historical Perspective
    Naval War College Review Volume 67 Article 6 Number 1 Winter 2014 The deI a of a “Fleet in Being” in Historical Perspective John B. Hattendorf Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Hattendorf, John B. (2014) "The deI a of a “Fleet in Being” in Historical Perspective," Naval War College Review: Vol. 67 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol67/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hattendorf: The Idea of a “Fleet in Being” in Historical Perspective THE IDEA OF a “FLEET IN BEING” IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE John B. Hattendorf he phrase “fleet in being” is one of those troublesome terms that naval his- torians and strategists have tended to use in a range of different meanings. TThe term first appeared in reference to the naval battle off Beachy Head in 1690, during the Nine Years’ War, as part of an excuse that Admiral Arthur Herbert, first Earl of Torrington, used to explain his reluctance to engage the French fleet in that battle. A later commentator pointed out that the thinking of several Brit- ish naval officers ninety years later during the War for American Independence, when the Royal Navy was in a similar situation of inferior strength, contributed an expansion to the fleet-in-being concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Person Name - Prefix a Table of Salutations That May Precede an Individual’S Name to Identify Social Status
    Person Name - Prefix A table of salutations that may precede an individual’s name to identify social status. Accurate and uniform information is key to exchanging data. The table below is the recommended format for an individuals name prefix. Note: Military abbreviations are provided in Non Department of National Defence writing format as per "The Canadian Style, A Guide to Writing and Editing" published in 1997. Prefix Abbreviation Second Lieutenant 2nd Lieut. Acting Sub-Lieutenant Acting Sub-Lieutenant Able Seaman A.B. Abbot Ab. Archbishop Abp. Admiral Admiral Brigadier-General Brig.-Gen Brother Bro. Base Chief Petty Officer BsCPO Captain Capt. Commander Cmdr. Chief Chief Commodore Commodore Colonel Col. Constable Const. Corporal Cpl. Chief Petty Officer 1st class Chief Petty Officer, 1st class Chief Petty Officer 2nd class Chief Petty Officer, 2nd class Constable Cst. Chief Warrant Officer Chief Warrant Officer Doctor Dr. Bishop (Episcopus) Episc Your Excellency Exc. Father Fr. General Gen. Her Worship Her Worship Her Excellency HerEx His Worship His Worship His Excellency HisEx Honourable Hon. Lieutenant-Commander Lt.-Cmdr Lieutenant-Colonel Lt.-Col Lieutenant-General Lt.-Gen Leading Seaman L.S. Lieutenant Lieut. Monsieur M. Person Name - Prefix Prefix Abbreviation Master Ma. Madam Madam Major Maj. Mayor Mayor Master Corporal Master Corporal Major-General Maj.-Gen Miss Miss Mademoiselle Mlle. Madame Mme. Mister Mr. Mistress Mrs. Ms Ms. Master Seaman M.S. Monsignor Msgr. Monsieur Mssr. Master Mstr Master Warrant Officer Master Warrant Officer Naval Cadet Naval Cadet Officer Cadet Officer Cadet Ordinary Seaman O.S. Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 2nd class Petty Officer, 2nd class Professor Prof.
    [Show full text]