DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Publications of Muzafer Sherif

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Publications of Muzafer Sherif Appendix A Publications of Muzafer Sherif w. A. Bousfeld and Muzafer Sherif. Hunger as a Factor in Learning. American Journal of Psychology, 1932, 44, 552-554. Muzafer Sherif. A Study of Some Social Factors in Perception. Archives of Psychology, 1935, 27, No. 187, 1-60. Muzafer Sherif. An Experimental Study of Stereotypes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1935, 29, 370-375. Muzafer Sherif. The Psychology of Social Nonns. New York: Harper, 1936. Muzafer Sherif, An Experimental Approach to the Study of Attitudes. Sociometry, 1937, 1, 90-98. Muzafer Sherif, The Psychology of Slogans. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1937, 32, 450-461. Hadley Cantril and Muzafer Sherif, The Kingdom of Father Divine. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1938,33, 147-167. Muzafer Sherif, Race Psychology (in Turkish). Istanbul: Universite Kitaberi, 1943. Muzafer Sherif, Translation into Turkish of R. S. Woodworth, Contemporary Schools of Psychology. Ankara: Ankara University Press, 1943. Muzafer Sherif, Some Recent Investigations on the Psychology of Attitudes (in Turkish). Ankara: Ankara University Press, 1944. Muzafer Sherif, The Changing World (in Turkish). Istanbul: 20th Century Books, 1945. Muzafer Sherif and Hadley Cantril, The Psychology of "Attitudes": Part I. Psychological Review, 1945,52, 295-319. Muzafer Sherif and Hadley Cantril, The Psychology of "Attitudes": Part II. Psychological Review, 1946,53, 1-24. Muzafer Sherif and Hadley Cantril, The Psychology of Ego-Involvements. New York: Wiley, 1947. Muzafer Sherif, Some Methodological Remarks Related to Experimentation in Social Psychology. International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research, 1947, 1, 71-93. 260 Appendix A Muzafer Sherif and S. Stansfeld Sargent, Ego-Involvement and the Mass Media. Journal of Social Issues, 1947,3, 8-16. Muzafer Sherif, An Outline of Social Psychology. New York: Harper, 1948. Muzafer Sherif, The Necessity of Considering Current Issues as Part and Parcel of Persistent Major Problems. International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research, 1948, 2, 63-68. Muzafer Sherif, The Problem of Inconsistency in Intergroup Relations. Journal of Social Issues, 1949,5, (No.3), 32-37. Muzafer Sherif, Some Social Psychological Aspects of Conceptual Functioning (pp. 61-77). In F. Northrup and H. Margenau (Eds.) , The Nature of Concepts, Their Inter-Relation and Role in Social Structure. Stillwater, Oklahoma A & M College, 1950. Muzafer Sherif, Introduction (pp. 1-28) and A Preliminary Experimental Study of Inter-Group Relations (pp. 388-424). In John H. Rohrer and Muzafer Sherif (Eds.), Social Psychology at the Crossroads. New York: Harper, 1951. Muzafer Sherif, Light from Psychology on Cultural Groups and Their Relations. In K. Bigelow (Ed.), Cultural Groups and Human Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1951. O. J. Harvey and Muzafer Sherif, Level of Aspiration as a Case of Judgmental Activity in Which Ego-Involvements Operate as Factors: An Experimental Study of Interpersonal Relations. Sociometry, 1951, 14, 121-147. Muzafer Sherif and o. J. Harvey, A Study in Ego Functioning: Elimination of Stable Anchorages in Individual and Group Situations. Sociometry, 1952, 15, 272-305. Carl I. Hovland and Muzafer Sherif, Judgmental Phenomena and Scales of Attitude Measurement: Item Displacement in Thurstone Scales. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 822-832. Muzafer Sherif, A Glance at Group Relations at the Crossroads: Introduction (pp. 1-32) and The Concept of Reference Groups in Human Relations (pp. 203-231). In Muzafer Sherif and M. o. Wilson (Eds.), Group Relations at the Crossroads. New York: Harper, 1953. Muzafer Sherif and Carl I. Hovland, Judgmental Phenomena and Scales of Attitude Measurement: Placement of Items with Individual Choice of Number of Categories. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953, 48, 135- 141. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, Groups in Harmony and Tension. New York: Harper, 1953. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, Some Effects of Power Relations in Molding Opinion and Behavior. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 1953, 33, 287-296. Muzafer Sherif, Elimination of Stable Anchorages in Individual and Group Situations. In Proceedings of Conference on Orientation. Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research, 1953. Appendix A 261 Muzafer Sherif, o. J. Harvey, B. Jack White, William R. Hood, and Carolyn W. Sherif, Experimental Study of Positive and Negative Intergroup Attitudes Between Experimentally Produced Groups. Norman: University of Oklahoma (Mimeo), 1954. Muzafer Sherif, Sociocultural Influences in Small Group Research. Sociology and Social Research, 1954,39, 1-10. Muzafer Sherif, Integrating Field Work and Laboratory in Small Group Research. American Sociological Review, 1954, 19, 759-771. Muzafer Sherif, B. Jack White, and o. J. Harvey, Status in Experimentally Produced Groups. American Journal of Sociology, 1955, 60, 370-379. William R. Hood and Muzafer Sherif, An Appraisal of Personality-Oriented Approaches to Prejudice. Sociology and Social Research, 1955, 40, 79-85. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, An Outline ofSocial Psychology (revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1956. Muzafer Sherif, Social Responsibility and the Group: Edvard C. Lindeman Memorial Lecture. In The Social Welfare Forum, 1956. New York: Columbia University Press, 1956. Muzafer Sherif, Introduction (pp. 1-6) and Towards Integrating Psychological and Sociological Approaches in Small Group Research (pp. 181-206). In Muzafer Sherif and M. o. Wilson (Eds.), Emerging Problems in Social Psychology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, 1957. Carll. Hovland, O. J. Harvey, and Muzafer Sherif, Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Reactions to Communication and Attitude Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 244-252. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, Experiments on Conflict and Harmony Between Groups. Education and Psychology, 1957, Sastry Memorial Volume, 192-205. Muzafer Sherif, Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 63, 349-356. Muzafer Sherif, Daniel Taub, and Carl I. Hovland, Assimilation and Contrast Effects of Anchoring Stimuli on Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 55, 150-155. Muzafer Sherif, Social Psychology, Anthropology, and the "Behavioral Sciences." Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 1959, 40, 105-112. Norman Jackman and Muzafer Sherif, Group Processes and Communication on the Prohibition Issue. Sociology and Social Research, 1959, 43, 265-271. Muzafer Sherif, Some Needed Concepts in the Study of Social Attitudes (pp. 194-213). In J. Peatman and E. Hartley (Eds.), Festschrift for Gardner Murphy. New York: Harper & Row, 1960. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn Sherif, Psychological Harmony and Conflict in Minority Group Ties. American Catholic Sociological Review, 1961, 22, 207-222. Muzafer Sherif, Conformity-Deviation, Norms, and Group Relations (pp. 159- 198). In B. Bass and I. Berg, Conformity and Deviation. New York: Harper & Row, 1961. 262 Appendix A Muzafer Sherif, o. J. Harvey, B. Jack White, William R. Hood, and Carolyn W. Sherif, Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, 1961. (Also published under the title, The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1988.) Muzafer Sherif and Carl 1. Hovland, Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961. Muzafer Sherif, Intergroup Relations and Leadership: Introductory Statement. In Muzafer Sherif (Ed.), Intergroup Relations and Leadership. New York: Wiley, 1962. William Robert Hood and Muzafer Sherif, Verbal Report and Judgment of an Unstructured Stimulus. Journal of Psychology, 1962,54, 121-130. Muzafer Sherif, The Self and Reference Groups: Meeting Ground of Individual and Group Approaches. In Fundamental Problems of Psychology: The Psychology of the Self. (Proceedings of the Second Conference on Psychology). New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1962. Muzafer Sherif, Social Psychology: Problems and Trends in Interdisciplinary Relations (pp. 30-93). In Sigmund Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science. Volume 6, Investigations of Man as Socius: Their Place in Psychology and the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, Varieties of Social Stimulus Situations. In Saul B. Sells (Ed.), Stimulus Dimensions Accounting for Behavior Variance. New York: Ronald Press, 1963. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, Reference Groups: An Exploration into Conformity and Deviation of Adolescents. New York: Harper & Row, 1964. Muzafer Sherif, Creative Alternatives to a Deadly Showdown. Trans-Action, 1964, 1 (January), 3-7. Carolyn W. Sherif, Muzafer Sherif, and Roger E. Nebergall, Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1965. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, Introduction and The Individual in His Group in Its Setting: Parts I and II. In Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif (Eds.), Problems of Youth: Transition to Adulthood in a Changing World. Chicago: Aldine, 1965. Muzafer Sherif, La Methode des Categories Personelles et les Recherches sur les Attitudes. Bulletin du C.E.R.P. (Paris), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1965, 13, Octobre-Decembre, 185-198. Muzafer Sherif and Carolyn W. Sherif, Research on Intergroup Relations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organizational Climate; Organizational Effectiveness; Social Action; Social Change; Social Problems
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 101 434 EA 006 711 AUTHOR Bolton, Charles K.; Lindberg, Mark E. TITLE Conflict: The Conditions and Processes in Community, Organizations, and Interpersonal Relationships. Exchange Bibliography No. 187. INSTITUTION Council of Planning Librarians, Monticello, Ill. PUB DATE May 71 NOTE 22p. AVAILABLE FROMCouncil of Planning Librarians, P.O. Box 229, Monticello, Illinois 61856 ($2.00) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.58 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Bibliographies; City Improvement; Community Change; Community Development; *Community Problems; *Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Interpersonal Problems; *Interpersonal Relationship; *Organizational Climate; Organizational Effectiveness; Social Action; Social Change; Social Problems ABSTPACT Community, organizational, and interpersonal conflict must be considered by those concerned with being active and effective participants in the process of planning for change in their communities. Each, of these three kinds of conflict is givena section in this selected bibliography. In each section entriesare listed under two headings: °conditions° and °processes." Conditions are defined as those things leading up to, but not including, the conflict itself. Examples of conditions include the composition and demographic factors for community conflict, structure for organizational conflict, and personality and needs for interpersonal conflict. Processes have to do with the conflict itself and include such things as strategies and tactics, both intended and inadvertent. Examples of processes are community organizing, bargaining, problem solving, fighting, and attitude polarizing. (Author/DN) Council of Planning LibrariansE :CHANGE BIBLIOGRAPHIES MAY 1971 187 CONFLICT: The Conditions and Processesiii Community, Organizations and Interpersonal Relationships Charles K. Bolton and Mark E. Lindberg, ResearchAssociates Institute for Research and Training in HigherEducation University of Cincinnati ,N 4 hi All( "' art of Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Social Psychology: Individuals, Ideas, and Investigations GEORGE R
    1 A Century of Social Psychology: Individuals, Ideas, and Investigations GEORGE R. GOETHALS ^ f INTRODUCTION This chapter tells an exciting story of intellectual discovery. At the start of the twentieth century, social psy- chology began addressing age-old philosophical questions using scientific methods. What was the nature of human nature, and did the human condition make it possible for people to work together for good rather than for evil? Social pschology first addressed these questions by looking at the overall impact of groups on individuals and then began to explore more refined questions about social influence and social perception. How do we understand persuasion, stereotypes and prejudice, differences between men and women, and how culture affects thoughts and behavior? In 1954, in his classic chapter on the historical govem themselves. In The Republic, Plato argued that background of modem social psychology, Gordon men organize themselves and form governments Allport nominated Auguste Comte as the founder because they cannot achieve all their goals as of social psychology as a science. He noted that individuals. They are interdependent. Some kind of Comte, the French philosopher and founder of social organization is required. Various forms emerge, positivism, had previously, in 1839, identified depending on the situation, including aristocracy, sociology as a separate discipline. In fact, sociology oligarchy, democracy, and tyranny. Plato clearly did not really exist, but Comte saw it coming. favored aristocracy, where the wise and just govern, Allport notes that 'one might say that Comte and allow individuals to develop their full potential. christened sociology many years before it was Whatever the form, social organization and govem- born' (Allport, 1968: 6).
    [Show full text]
  • 69-22,112 COOKE, Madeline Anna, 1924- a STUDY of THE
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-22,112 COOKE, Madeline Anna, 1924- A STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF POSITIVE ATTITUDES TOWARD NATIVE SPEAKERS OF SPANISH. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1969 Language and Literature, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © Copyright by Madeline Anna Oooke 19701 A STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF POSITIVE ATTITUDES TOWARD NATIVE SPEAKERS OF SPANISH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Madeline Anna Cooke, B.Sc.t M.A. *#*### The Ohio State University 1969 Approved by /P. Adviser Department of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mil graclas to my adviser, Dr. Edward D. 'Allen, for consistently removing rather than creating obstacles; to Dr. William L. Libby, Jr. for guiding me through the new world of test development; and to Dr. Erika E. Bourgulgnon for helping me see the old world in new ways. This study could never have materialized without the cooperation of many people at Valley Forge High School. My principal, Mr. David M. Smith, not only allowed the tests to be administered, but also arranged a less-demanding teaching schedule for me. Colleagues enthusiastically offered their classes for a variety of testing purposes. The tests were printed with the help of teachers in both the commercial and graphic arts departments. I owe a special debt of gratitude to my own wonderful students, who served as unsuspecting—I hope—subjects. I also wish proudly to acknowledge the role played by my father, Herbert Oooke, who gave up hours of his "bor­ rowed time" to assist in some of the scoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Beauty Only Skin Deep? Exploring the Connections Between Makeup and Perception Shawn Kuehl Concordia University, Saint Paul
    Concordia Journal of Communication Research Volume 5 Article 1 6-1-2018 Is Beauty Only Skin Deep? Exploring the Connections Between Makeup and Perception Shawn Kuehl Concordia University, Saint Paul Scarlett eD Wild Concordia University, Saint Paul Jessica Mai Concordia University, Saint Paul Mai Yeng Yang Concordia University, Saint Paul Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/comjournal Part of the Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons Recommended Citation Kuehl, Shawn; DeWild, Scarlett; Mai, Jessica; and Yeng Yang, Mai (2018) "Is Beauty Only Skin Deep? Exploring the Connections Between Makeup and Perception," Concordia Journal of Communication Research: Vol. 5 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/comjournal/vol5/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Concordia Journal of Communication Research by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Title: Is BeautyKuehl Only et al.: SkinIs Beauty Deep? Only Skin Deep? Exploring the Connections Between Makeu Is Beauty Only Skin Deep? Exploring the Connections Between Makeup and Perception Shawn Kuehl, Scarlett DeWild, Jessica Mai, and Mai Yeng Yang Concordia University, St. Paul In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Course Com: 441 Methods in Research and Com: 442 Research Theory 2017 Published by DigitalCommons@CSP, 2018 1 IS BEAUTY ONLY SKINConcordia DEEP? Journal of Communication Research, Vol. 5 [2018], Art. 1 ABSTRACT This study explored college students’ perceptions of the use of makeup. In order to determine what effect makeup had on first impressions, an online survey was conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Social Psychology 1 Wolfgang Stroebe, Miles Hewstone and Klaus Jonas 9781405124003 4 001.Qxd 10/31/07 2:52 PM Page 3
    9781405124003_4_001.qxd 10/31/07 2:52 PM Page 2 Introducing Social Psychology 1 Wolfgang Stroebe, Miles Hewstone and Klaus Jonas 9781405124003_4_001.qxd 10/31/07 2:52 PM Page 3 CHAPTER OUTLINE We introduce social psychology with a few examples of classic studies to give an impression of the research questions social psychologists address and of the methods they use to tackle these ques- tions. We then present a formal definition of social psychology and discuss the differences between social psychology and related areas. The main part of the chapter is devoted to the history of social psychology, which we trace from the starting years around 1900 until today. Most of this history took place in the USA, but this development was strongly influenced by European researchers, even before the establishment of a European social psychology following World War II. Introduction: Some Classic Studies How do social psychologists go about addressing research questions? In 1954, Muzafer Sherif (see Pioneer box, Chapter 14, p. 295), who was then professor of social psychology at the University of Oklahoma (USA), conducted one of a series of classic studies with 11-year-old boys, who had been sent to a remote summer camp at Robbers Cave State Park, Oklahoma. None of the boys knew each other before the study. They were divided into two groups, who stayed in cabins far apart from each other and did not know of each other’s existence. For one week, each of the groups enjoyed the typical summer camp life, engaging in fun activities like camp- ing out, transporting canoes over rough terrain to the water and playing various games.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: to FOSTER a LOVE (EMPATHY) for ENEMIES
    Running Head: TO FOSTER A LOVE (EMPATHY) FOR ENEMIES To foster a love for ‘enemies’! Using psychology data to muster out-group empathy Robin Lynn Treptow Fielding Graduate University 5 August 2016 Author Note: Robin Lynn Treptow, School of Educational Leadership for Change [Infant and Early Childhood Development with Emphases in Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Doctoral Program], Fielding Graduate University. This manuscript was presented in Treptow, R.L. (chair), Leading With Empathy: Understanding Violence And Promoting Peace, at the 124th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association in Denver, Colorado. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Robin Lynn Treptow, School of Educational Leadership for Change, Fielding Graduate University, 2020 De la Vina Street, Santa Barbara, California 93105-3814. Email: [email protected] Running Head: TO FOSTER A LOVE (EMPATHY) FOR ENEMIES 2 Abstract In-group and out-group tensions plague civilization. Distrust and the disagreeableness it breeds chip away at amity: creating deep rifts in social harmony—rending our sense of a shared humanity. Race, ideological views, ethnicity, political leanings, scientific assumptions, et cetera split cadres of folk into “us” and “them”—“with” and “against” factions. Enemies. Despite Muzafer Sherif’s (1954) classical studies that throwing everyone’s efforts together towards superordinate goals can overcome such grave divisions they yet persist. Violence, death, bloodshed, poverty, and countless like evils pile up whilst humankind squabbles as to whose way is right, pure, or best. Even assemblages allied for the same social goods (e.g., an end to war, stopping crime) rarely work cohesively with oiled precision rooted in respect-filled integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Goetze Pathways to Conflict ETPS 2010X
    PATHWAYS TO ETHNIC CONFLICT* David Goetze Utah State University Abstract In recent years, the tidy framework of rational choice models and the untethered plasticity of culture models have come under challenge as approaches to explaining human social behaviors. Chief among scientifically-oriented competitors are biologic, evolutionary, and cognitive science approaches. This new work is helping to fill in the notorious “black box” that, in an earlier era, characterized human brain function. Reasoning in cognitive science and evolutionary theory is expanding our conceptual understanding of how the human brain really works and how it generates behaviors while a growing body of empirical work is enabling us to begin the testing of derived hypotheses. Even before the recent explosion of life science research, the modern synthesis of genetics and Darwinian natural selection solidified the underpinnings of evolutionary theory and paved the way for its use as a framework or paradigm for studying human social behaviors. This article asks what the evolutionary paradigm and life sciences can contribute to explaining one of the more important broad-scale behavior sets of the human species – those pertaining to warfare and, especially, to ethnic war, often cast as a primordial and seemingly ineradicable form of human conflict. The quick answer is that these modes of thought and research draw on evolutionary reasoning to formulate and constrain hypotheses about the causes and consequences of war; dispense with arbitrary and unduly limiting conceptions of human nature that stymied the search for genuine sources of warfare; and explore research areas, for example, human neurology and genetics, that were utterly untapped a few decades ago and are now offering a cornucopia of scientific evidence relevant to all types of human social behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Social-Psychological Problems Involved in the Adjustment of Students to the University Community
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1951 Some Social-Psychological Problems Involved in the Adjustment of Students to the University Community. Bardin Hubert Nelson Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Nelson, Bardin Hubert, "Some Social-Psychological Problems Involved in the Adjustment of Students to the University Community." (1951). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7996. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7996 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. so?ca sooiAix»psycitoXiOQ -1 cAii p h o d leu s im n u Y m u<tu :.; ABTO?TJ«r O'F STl'DCTS 20 TH8 D tflTORSm COMMUNITY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Ayricultural and Mechanioal College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Sociology hy Burdin Hubert ?!el son B.S., Louisiana State University, 19^2 M. A., Louisiana State University, 19^3 August, 195G UMI Number: DP69374 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • How Science on the Social Brain Can Inform Antidiscrimination Law Susan D
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Miami School of Law University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 5-6-2019 Acting Differently: How Science on the Social Brain Can Inform Antidiscrimination Law Susan D. Carle American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Susan D. Carle, Acting Differently: How Science on the Social Brain Can Inform Antidiscrimination Law, 73 U. Miami L. Rev. 655 (2019) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol73/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES Acting Differently: How Science on the Social Brain Can Inform Antidiscrimination Law SUSAN D. CARLE* Legal scholars are becoming increasingly interested in how the literature on implicit bias helps explain illegal dis- crimination. However, these scholars have not yet mined all of the insights that science on the social brain can offer an- tidiscrimination law. That science, which researchers refer to as social neuroscience, involves a broadly interdiscipli- nary approach anchored in experimental natural science methodologies. Social neuroscience shows that the brain tends to evaluate others by distinguishing between “us” ver- sus “them” on the basis of often insignificant characteris- tics, such as how people dress, sing, joke, or otherwise be- have.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Transformational Moments in Feminist Psychology Stephanie A
    The Legacy of Transformational Moments in Feminist Psychology Stephanie A. Shields The Pennsylvania State University Important turning points in feminist psychology can sometimes be traced to particular moments—specific publications or situations in which an individual or group sparked advancement of the field. Some of these moments are acknowledged in our collective understanding of our history. For example, Naomi Weisstein’s (1968) "Kinder, Küche, Kirche as Scientific Law: Psychology Constructs the Female" often marks the beginning of contemporary feminist psychology (Rutherford, Vaughn-Blount, & Ball, 2010). Just as there are widely acknowledged milestones, such as the founding of Division 35, the Association for Women in Psychology, APA’s Committee on Women in Psychology, feminist psychological organizations in other countries, and many feminist journals in psychology, there are also local transformational moments deeply woven into the fabric of our history. These may be geographically specific, as in the history of a particular region or university, or they may be local events that we now realize were moments in a larger pattern that has shaped feminist psychology. The history of women in psychology has been a concern of feminist psychologists since the 1970s when a then-new generation of feminists realized that women were missing from the history of American psychology and worked to collect biographies and autobiographies to ensure that women’s place in the history of psychology would be there as a model for the women coming up in the ranks and never again be lost (e.g., Bernstein & Russo, 1974; Sexton, 1974; Scarborough & Furumoto, 1986, 1987; Russo & Denmark, 1987; Johnston & Johnson, 2008; Unger, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DOGMATISM and EGO-INVOLVEMENT APPROVED: Major Professor Minor P Director^ Department O£ Speech and Drama
    RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DOGMATISM AND EGO-INVOLVEMENT APPROVED: Major Professor Minor P Director^ Department o£ Speech and Drama Dean df the Graduate School RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DOGMATISM AND EGO-INVOLVEMENT THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Sandra E. Dean, B. A. Denton, Texas January, 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . iv Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 Statement of the Problem Hypotheses to be Tested Contents of the Study II. SURVEY OF THE LITERA.TURE 6 The Open- and Closed-Mind Theory Development of the Dogmatism Scale The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach The Method of Ordered Alternatives III. METHOD 28 Procedure Selection of Subjects Statistical Treatment IV. RESULTS 32 Statistical Data from the Tests Discussion of the Findings V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 37 Summary Conclusions Suggestions for Future Research APPENDIX I APPENDIX II ......43 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....... .47 X.1X LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Sample Variations in Sizes of Latitudes Obtained from Method of Ordered Alternatives 21 II. Means and Standard Deviations for Hypothesis I 33 III. Means and Standard Deviations for Hypotheses II and III 34 IV. Means and Standard Deviations of Males and Females within Group I 35 xv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Recent research -in communication theory has focused on the nature of attitude and attitude change. A thorough understanding of human communication is partly dependent on recognizing the way in which the attitudes held by an audience influence the response to messages. Approaches to the study of attitudes vary depending on the special interests of the researchers involved.
    [Show full text]
  • The 25 Most Influential Psychological Experiments in History
    The 25 Most Influential Psychological Experiments in History By Kristen Fescoe Published January 2016 The field of psychology is a very broad field comprised of many smaller specialty areas. Each of these specialty areas has been strengthened over the years by research studies designed to prove or disprove theories and hypotheses that pique the interests of psychologists throughout the world. While each year thousands and thousands of studies are completed in the many specialty areas of psychology, there are a handful that, over the years, have had a lasting impact in the psychological community as a whole. Some of these were dutifully conducted, keeping within the confines of ethical and practical guidelines. Others pushed the boundaries of the field and created controversies that still linger to this day. And still others were not designed to be true psychological experiments, but ended up as beacons to the psychological community in proving or disproving theories. This is a list of the 25 most influential psychological experiments still being taught to psychology students of today. 1. A Class Divided Study Conducted By: Jane Elliott Study Conducted in 1968 in an Iowa classroom Experiment Details: Jane Elliott’s famous experiment was inspired by the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the inspirational life that he led. The third grade teacher developed an exercise to help her Caucasian students understand the effects of racism and prejudice. Elliott divided her class into two separate groups: blue-eyed students and brown-eyed students. On the first day, she labeled the blue-eyed group as the superior group and from that point forward they had extra privileges, leaving the brown-eyed children to represent the minority group.
    [Show full text]