DOCSLIB.ORG

'Dreamers of the Day': Australia and the International Court of Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Dreamers of the Day': Australia and the International Court of Justice ‘DREAMERS OF THE DAY’: AUSTRALIA AND THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Australia and the International Court of Justice JAMES CRAWFORD This article reflects on Australia’s relationship with the International Court of Justice (‘the Court), charting its influence as a ‘middle power’ on the development of international law and the peaceful settlement of disputes from the San Francisco Conference onwards. Over that time, Australia has both supported the Court and relied upon it as a tool to defend or advance its foreign policy. Australia has nonetheless had to traverse some difficult terrain, from the South-West Africa cases (controversially decided on the casting vote of the Australian judge, President Sir Percy Spender) to the East Timor case (won on a technicality). While Australia’s active engagement has ebbed and flowed, contributions to Australia’s links with the Court have been made, directly or indirectly, by such remarkable Australians as Dr Herbert Vere Evatt, Sir Kenneth Bailey (who twice missed out on being elected to the Court), Sir Paul Hasluck, Sir Percy Spender and Mr Edward Gough Whitlam). CONTENTS I Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 II Evatt, Bailey and Hasluck at the San Francisco Conference .................................... 2 III Australia and the Early Years of the Court ............................................................... 7 IV The Nomination of Sir Percy Spender .................................................................... 10 V Spender and the South-West Africa cases ............................................................... 14 VI Australia before the Court, 1973 – Present Day ..................................................... 19 VII Past, Present and Future .......................................................................................... 29 ‘All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did.’1 — T E Lawrence I INTRODUCTION The position of the International Court of Justice (‘ICJ’ or ‘the Court’) and its relationship to the system of international law since 1945 can be found abbreviated in the words of art 92 of the Charter of the United Nations James Crawford AC SC is Whewell Professor of International Law, University of Cambridge and a member of the Australian and English bars. He was the first Australian member of the United Nations International Law Commission and in that capacity was responsible for the ILC’s work on the International Criminal Court (1994) and for the second reading of the ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001). He is a Research Professor of Law at La Trobe University, Victoria and is currently Australian candidate for election to the International Court of Justice. This piece is adapted from the 2013 Kenneth Bailey Memorial Lecture, presented on 19 March 2013 at the Melbourne Law School. 1 T E Lawrence, Seven Pillars of Wisdom (Wordsworth, 1997) 7. 1 2 Melbourne Journal of International Law [Vol 14 (‘Charter’). This provides: The International Court of Justice shall be the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It shall function in accordance with the annexed Statute, which is based upon the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice and forms an integral part of the present Charter.2 And so it is and so it does. But my purpose before you here today is not to attempt to expand upon those rather elegantly drafted 46 words in general but, rather, to contextualise them in relation to Australia — a country generally perceived as less than central to international affairs, notwithstanding its recent election to the Security Council.3 In fact, Australia has had considerable involvement in the workings of the ICJ. An investigation of the history of that relationship reveals the presence and personalities of notable Australians of the past 50 years, including Sir Kenneth Bailey himself, in whose memory this lecture is held. He was the Dean of the Melbourne Law School from 1928–36 and then again from 1938–42. He was Commonwealth Solicitor-General from 1946–64 and twice a candidate for election to the Court, something he never achieved.4 Australia has played a significant role in the work of the ICJ from the beginning, participating in the United Nations Conference on International Organization at San Francisco in 1945 (‘San Francisco Conference’), nominating its nationals for the Bench (not always successfully) and participating in various cases and advisory proceedings. This relationship reflects more generally Australia’s foreign policy priorities in the years following World War II, most notably a firm belief in a system for the peaceful settlement of international disputes including the ICJ. This demonstrates the capacity of a ‘middle power’ to influence the development of international law — even at the risk of being seen as one of the ‘dreamers of the day’. II EVATT, BAILEY AND HASLUCK AT THE SAN FRANCISCO CONFERENCE Australia’s connection to the ICJ begins at the San Francisco Conference. Although the UN’s predecessor, the League of Nations (‘League’), also had at its disposal a judicial organ in the form of the Permanent Court of International 2 See also Hermann Mosler and Karin Oellers-Frahm, ‘The International Court of Justice’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2002) vol 2, 1139, 1139–71 (on art 92 of the Charter of the United Nations). 3 Department of Public Information, General Assembly, ‘General Assembly Elects Argentina, Australia, Luxembourg, Republic of Korea, Rwanda as Non-Permanent Members of Security Council’ (Media Release, GA/11303, 18 October 2012) <http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/ga11303.doc.htm>. 4 Jack E Richardson, ‘Bailey, Sir Kenneth Hamilton (1898–1972)’ in John Ritchie and Christopher Cunneen (eds), Australian Dictionary of Biography (Melbourne University Press, 1993) vol 13, 89. See also Melbourne Law School, Kenneth Bailey 1928–36, 1938–1942 (4 January 2013) <http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/melbourne-law-school/comm unity/history/people/deans/kenneth-bailey>. 2013] Australia and the International Court of Justice 3 Justice (‘PCIJ’),5 Australia took little interest in the drafting of its Statute,6 never nominated a judge to its Bench and never appeared before it — although in 1929 it made a declaration accepting the optional clause jurisdiction of the PCIJ.7 But Australia did take an interest in the workings of the League more generally and its delegations usually included a range of figures of high public profile, notably Stanley Bruce. Bruce’s association with the League began as a young Member of Parliament in 1921 and he continued throughout his political career to address such issues as the Great Depression, the Italian conquest of Abyssinia, the Hoare-Laval Pact, the lead-up to World War II and the collapse of the League.8 Australia emerged from World War II with a foreign policy distinct from that of the United Kingdom. The Labor Governments of John Curtin and Ben Chifley sought to inject a liberal internationalism into Australia’s external affairs, resulting in their support for international organisations which were then emerging.9 The principal architect of this shift was Herbert Vere Evatt, who served simultaneously as Australia’s Attorney-General and Minister for External Affairs from 1941 to 1949.10 An extraordinarily divisive figure, Evatt’s qualities as a visionary — albeit a deeply flawed one — need not be recounted here.11 As a former judge of the High Court of Australia and as chief foreign representative of one of the victorious Allies, he was qualified to play a significant role at San Francisco. The Conference took place from 25 April to 26 June 1945 and is widely 5 See generally Ole Spiermann, International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International Judiciary (Cambridge University Press, 2005). 6 Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice. 7 The declaration of 20 September 1929 was replaced by a new declaration of 21 August 1940. For the text of both, see Protocol of Signature of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, opened for signature 16 December 1920, 200 LNTS 494 (entered into force 1 September 1921). 8 Cecil Edwards, Bruce of Melbourne: Man of Two Worlds (Heinemann, 1965) 47, 53–6, 223, 230. 9 See generally David Lee, ‘The Curtin and Chifley Governments, Liberal Internationalism and World Organisation’ in David Lee and Christopher Waters (eds), Evatt to Evans: The Labor Tradition in Australian Foreign Policy (Allen & Unwin, 1997) 48. 10 Alan Watt, The Evolution of Australian Foreign Policy 1938–1965 (Cambridge University Press, 1968) 61. On the wider sweep of Evatt’s role in Australia’s foreign policy in the immediate post-war era, see ch 4. 11 Evatt’s many achievements and his famously difficult character have made him the subject of numerous biographies: see, eg, Allan Dalziel, Evatt: The Enigma (Lansdowne Press, 1967); Kylie Tennant, Evatt: Politics and Justice (Angus and Robertson, 1970); Peter Crockett, Evatt: A Life (Oxford University Press, 1993); Ken Buckley, Barbara Dale and Wayne Reynolds, Doc Evatt: Patriot, Internationalist, Fighter and Scholar (Longman Cheshire, 1994). More relevantly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Herbert Vere Evatt, the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights After 60 Years
    238 (2009) 34 UWA LAW REVIEW Herbert Vere Evatt, the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights After 60 Years MICHAEL KIRBY AC CMG* ERBERT VERE EVATT was a product of public schools. He attended Fort HStreet Boys’ High School in Sydney, the oldest public school in Australia, as I later did. That school has refl ected the ethos of public education in Australia: free, compulsory and secular. These values infl uenced Evatt’s values as they did my own.1 As an Australian lawyer, Evatt stood out. He was a Justice of the High Court of Australia for 10 years in the 1930s. However, his greatest fame was won by his leadership role in the formation of the United Nations and in the adoption of its Charter in 1945. He was elected the third President of the General Assembly. He was in the chair of the Assembly, on 10 December 1948, when it voted to accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).2 It is 60 years since that resolution of 1948. In the imagination of immature schoolchildren, like me, in the 1940s and 1950s, the Hiroshima cloud was imprinted on our consciousness. We knew (perhaps more than Australians do today) how important it was for the survival of the human species that the United Nations should be effective, including in the attainment of the values expressed in its new UDHR. When I arrived at high school in 1951, Evatt was honoured as a famous alumnus. By then, he was no longer a judge or Federal minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Ninian Stephen Lecture 2003
    THE HIGH COURT’S ABANDONMENT OF ‘THE TIME-HONOURED METHODOLOGY OF THE COMMON LAW’ IN ITS INTERPRETATION OF NATIVE TITLE IN MIRRIUWUNG GAJERRONG AND YORTA YORTA Sir Ninian Stephen Annual Lecture 2003 Noel Pearson Law School University of Newcastle 17 March 2003 There are fundamental problems with the way in which the High Court has interpreted native title in Australian law in its two most recent decisions: Mirriuwung Gajerrong1 and Yorta Yorta2. In the space of this lecture I will only be able to deal with three key problems: the court‟s misinterpretation of the definition of native title in section 223(1) of the Native Title Act 1993-1998 (Cth) (“Native Title Act”) the court‟s misinterpretation of how the common law treats traditional indigenous occupants of land when the Crown acquires sovereignty over their land as an injusticiable act of State the court‟s disavowal of native title as a doctrine or body of law within the common law – 1 State of Western Australia v Ward [2002] HCA 28 (8 August 2002). Referred to variously as Ward and Mirriuwung Gajerrong 2 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58 (12 December 2002) 1 and its failure to judge the Yorta Yorta people‟s claim in accordance with this body of law I will close with some views about what I think needs to be done in all justice to indigenous Australians. But before I undertake this critique, let me first set out my understanding of what Mabo3 and native title should have meant to Australians.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Neil Young Qc
    CURRICULUM VITAE NEIL YOUNG QC Address Melbourne Ninian Stephen Chambers (Chambers) Level 38, 140 William Street, Melbourne Vic 3000 Email [email protected] Clerk Michael Green – Ph 03 9225 7864 Sydney New Chambers 126 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Email [email protected] Clerk Ian Belshaw – Ph 02 9151 2080 Present position Queen’s Counsel, all Australian States Academic LL.B (1st class honours), University of Melbourne Qualifications LL.M Harvard, 1977 Current Member of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, Geneva, since 1999 professional Director, Victorian Bar Foundation positions Director of the Melbourne Law School Foundation Board Previous Vice-Chairman, Victorian Bar Council, September 1995 to March 1997 professional Director, Barristers’ Chambers Limited, 1994 to 1998 positions Chairman of the Victorian Bar Council, March 1997 to September 1998 President, Australian Bar Association, January 1999 to February 2000 Member, Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne, 1997 2005 Member of the Monash University Faculty of Law Selection Committee, 1998 Member of the JD Advisory Board, Melbourne University, since 1999 Member of the Steering Committee, Forum of Barristers and Advocates of the International Bar Association, January 1999 to February 2000 Member of the Trade Practices and Taxation Law Committees of the Law Council of Australia Chairman of the Continuing Legal Education Committee of the Victorian Bar, 2003 – November 2005 Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, 2005-2007 Page 1 of 2 Admission Details Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria since 3 March 1975 Practitioner of the High Court of Australia and the Federal Court since 3 April 1975 Signed the Victorian Bar Roll on 15 March 1979 Admitted as a barrister, or barrister and solicitor in each of the other States of Australia Appointment Appointed one of Her Majesty’s Counsel for the State of Victoria on 27 November to the Inner Bar 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents of the United Nations General Assembly
    Presidents of the United Nations General Assembly Sixty -ninth 2014 Mr. Sam Kahamba Kutesa (Pres i- Uganda dent-elect) Sixty -eighth 2013 Mr. John W. Ashe Antigua and Barbuda Sixty -seventh 2012 Mr. Vuk Jeremić Serbia Sixty -sixth 2011 Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al -Nasser Qatar Sixty -fifth 2010 Mr. Joseph Deiss Switzerland Sixty -fourth 2009 Dr. Ali Abdussalam Treki Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2009 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty -third 2008 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty -second 2007 Dr. Srgjan Kerim The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixty -first 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixtieth 2005 Mr. Jan Eliasson Sweden Twenty -eighth special 2005 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Fifty -ninth 2004 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2004 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia (resumed twice) 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty -eighth 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty -seventh 2002 Mr. Jan Kavan Czech Republic Twenty -seventh special 2002 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2002 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea (resumed) 2001 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea Fifty -sixth 2001 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea Twenty -sixth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty -fifth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Fifty -fifth 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty -fourth special 2000 Mr. Theo -Ben Gurirab Namibia Twenty -third special 2000 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth and Misrepresentation in Australian Foreign Policy Menzies and Engagement with Asia
    BenvenutiMyth and Misrepresentation and Jones in Australian Foreign Policy Myth and Misrepresentation in Australian Foreign Policy Menzies and Engagement with Asia ✣ Andrea Benvenuti and David Martin Jones In 1960 the deputy leader of the Australian Labor Party, Gough Whitlam, declared that Australia “has for ten years missed the opportunity to interpret the new nations to the old world and the old world to the new na- tions.”1 Throughout the 1960s, Labor spokesmen attacked the foreign policy of Sir Robert Menzies’s Liberal–Country Party coalition government (1949– 1966) for both its dependence on powerful friends and its alleged insensitivity to Asian countries.2 This criticism of Liberal foreign policy not only persisted in later decades but also became the prevailing academic and media ortho- doxy.3 As we show here, Labor’s criticism constitutes the basis of a tenacious political myth that demands critical reevaluation. Menzies’s political opponents and, subsequently, his academic critics have claimed that his attitude toward Asia was permeated by suspicion and conde- scension. From the 1970s, an inchoate Labor left and academic understand- ing contended that conservative Anglo-centrism “had placed Australia on the losing side of almost every external engagement from the Suez Crisis to Viet- nam.”4 A decade later, analysts writing in the context of the Labor-driven doc- trine of “enmeshment” with Asia reinforced this emerging foreign policy or- 1. Gordon Greenwood and Norman Harper, eds., Australia in World Affairs 1956–1960 (Melbourne: Cheshire, 1963), p. 96. 2. See, for instance, Mads Clausen, “‘Falsiªed by History’: Menzies, Asia and Post-Imperial Australia,” History Compass, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The United Nations and the problems of Palestine 1947-1949 Manners, James How to cite: Manners, James (1973) The United Nations and the problems of Palestine 1947-1949, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10003/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE PROBLEM OF PALESTINE 1947-1949 by James I'fenners Submitted for the Degree of Master of Arts to the University of Durham after research in the School of Oriental Studies September 1973 CONTENTS Summary of Thesis iv Note on References v CHAPTER ONE THE FIRST SPECIAL SESSION. APRIL 28-MY 15. 19^7 i) The Acceptance of the British Proposal to Establish a United Nations Special Committee on Palestine 1 ii) The Establishment of IMscop's Terms of Reference 8 iii) Reactions to the Establishment of Iftiscop 1? CHAPTER TWO THE UI^SCOP INVESTIGATION.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solidarity of the Inter-American System in the United Nations General Assembly on the Spanish Question
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1951 The solidarity of the inter-American system in the United Nations General Assembly on the Spanish question Victor Charles Dahl The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dahl, Victor Charles, "The solidarity of the inter-American system in the United Nations General Assembly on the Spanish question" (1951). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8647. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8647 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TES aOLXBÀRItl OF TBS XSTSR^AIOBRXCAB SYSTEM in th# Ü5XTSD lATIOHS OSSERàL ASm&BLT on tlM SPAHXSH QOSSTIOB by - Yiotor C. _____ S.A., Montana State University, 1950 PToeented In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Montana State University 1951 Approved: 'K rT. Châirman of Board of Szaminers Dean, Graduate Sohool UMI Number: EP39448 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Presidents of the Presidents United Nations General Assembly
    Sixty-seventh session of the General Assembly To convene on United Nations 18 September 2012 List of Presidents of the Presidents United Nations General Assembly Session Year Name Country Sixty-seventh 2012 Mr. Vuk Jeremić (President-elect) Serbia Sixty-sixth 2011 Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser Qatar Sixty-fifth 2010 Mr. Joseph Deiss Switzerland Sixty-fourth 2009 Dr. Ali Abdussalam Treki Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2009 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty-third 2008 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty-second 2007 Dr. Srgjan Kerim The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixty-first 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixtieth 2005 Mr. Jan Eliasson Sweden Twenty-eighth special 2005 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Fifty-ninth 2004 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2004 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia (resumed twice) 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty-eighth 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty-seventh 2002 Mr. Jan Kavan Czech Republic Twenty-seventh special 2002 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2002 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea (resumed) 2001 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea Fifty-sixth 2001 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea Twenty-sixth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty-fifth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Fifty-fifth 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty-fourth special 2000 Mr. Theo-Ben Gurirab Namibia Twenty-third special 2000 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Nations at 70 Isbn: 978-92-1-101322-1
    DOUBLESPECIAL DOUBLESPECIAL asdf The magazine of the United Nations BLE ISSUE UN Chronicle ISSUEIS 7PMVNF-**t/VNCFSTt Rio+20 THE UNITED NATIONS AT 70 ISBN: 978-92-1-101322-1 COVER.indd 2-3 8/19/15 11:07 AM UNDER-SECRETARY-GENERAL FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION Cristina Gallach DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATION Maher Nasser EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Ramu Damodaran EDITOR Federigo Magherini ART AND DESIGN Lavinia Choerab EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS Lyubov Ginzburg, Jennifer Payulert, Jason Pierce SOCIAL MEDIA ASSISTANT Maria Laura Placencia The UN Chronicle is published quarterly by the Outreach Division of the United Nations Department of Public Information. Please address all editorial correspondence: By e-mail [email protected] By phone 1 212 963-6333 By fax 1 917 367-6075 By mail UN Chronicle, United Nations, Room S-920 New York, NY 10017, USA Subscriptions: Customer service in the USA: United Nations Publications Turpin Distribution Service PO Box 486 New Milford, CT 06776-0486 USA Email: [email protected] Web: ebiz.turpin-distribution.com Tel +1-860-350-0041 Fax +1-860-350-0039 Customer service in the UK: United Nations Publications Turpin Distribution Service Pegasus Drive, Stratton Business Park Biggleswade SG18 8TQ United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Web: ebiz.turpin-distribution.com Tel +1 44 (0) 1767 604951 Fax +1 44 (0) 1767 601640 Reproduction: Articles contained in this issue may be reproduced for educational purposes in line with fair use. Please send a copy of the reprint to the editorial correspondence address shown above. However, no part may be reproduced for commercial purposes without the expressed written consent of the Secretary, Publications Board, United Nations, Room S-949 New York, NY 10017, USA © 2015 United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicant Memorial: Concordia and Landia
    MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2008 Team No. 2 IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE PEACE PALACE, THE HAGUE CASE CONCERNING THE CONTINUED PROVISION OF LIFELINE SATELLITE SERVICES TO COUNTRIES IN THE FACE OF SATELLITE OPERATOR INSOLVENCY THE STATE OF CONCORDIA THE STATE OF LANDIA V. THE KINGDOM OF USURPIA ON SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE - MEMORIAL FOR THE JOINT APPLICANTS - THE STATE OF CONCORDIA THE STATE OF LANDIA MANFRED LACHS MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2008 Team No. 2 IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE PEACE PALACE, THE HAGUE Case concerning the Continued Provision of Lifeline Satellite Services to Countries In the Face of Satellite Operator Insolvency Concordia and Landia v. Usurpia ON SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE MEMORIAL FOR THE JOINT APPLICANTS CONCORDIA AND LANDIA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................................................................................................. V QUESTIONS PRESENTED.................................................................................................. XI STATEMENT OF FACTS .................................................................................................. XII SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS ...................................................................................... XXV ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................ 1 I. USURPIA’S DECISION TO LICENSE AND THEN AUTHORIZE THE RELOCATION OF THE SATELSAT-18
    [Show full text]
  • Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition 2015
    MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2015 Team No. 3 IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE PEACE PALACE, THE HAGUE CASE CONCERNING PLANETARY DEFENSE THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLES INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC (SPIDR) v. THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF ADVENTURA (URA) ON SUBMISSION TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLES INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC (SPIDR) TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................. v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................................................................. vi A. IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................ vi B. TREATIES AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ................................................................... vi C. INTERNATIONAL LAW CASES ............................................................................................ vii i. International Court of Justice (I.C.J.) ................................................................... vii ii. Permanent Court of International Justice (P.C.I.J.) .......................................... viii iii. Arbitral Tribunals .................................................................................................. viii iv. National Court Decisions .......................................................................................... ix v. Other Judicial Decisions ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Europe Before the World Court: “Thumbelina” of the International Legal Order?**
    Miloš Hrnjaz PhD,* doi:10.5937/zrpfni1982099H Assistant Professor, оригинални научни рад University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Science UDK: 341.6(4-11) Рад примљен: 25.12.2018. Рад прихваћен: 22.02.2019. EASTERN EUROPE BEFORE THE WORLD COURT: “THUMBELINA” OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER?** Abstract: The cases referred to the World Court (the ICJ and he PCIJ) that arose as a consequence of the events which occurred in Eastern Europe, as well as some brilliant albeit mutually very different international jurists from this part of Europe, had a significant impact on the development of international law. The article provides strong evidence that the significance of Eastern Europe issues and the Court judges coming from this region is highly disproportionate to the rather minuscule size of the Eastern Euro- pean region. This importance is proven by several quantitative and quali- tative indicators summarized in the concluding remarks of the article: the number of Eastern European cases brought before the Court, the number of Eastern European judges who served in the Court, the number of judges from Eastern Europe who were Presidents of the Court, the number of years during which Presidents of the Court were from Eastern Europe, the impact of some of the judges on the substance of key Court decisions, etc. Keywords: International Court of Justice (ICJ), Permanent Court of Inter- national Justice (PCIJ), Eastern Europe, development of international law, ICJ judges. * [email protected] ** This article is the result of research on the project “Political Identity of Serbia in a Global and Regional Context” (no.179076), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.
    [Show full text]