What Does Science Say About Creation?
Dr. Heinz Lycklama [email protected] www.osta.com
What Does Science Have To Say?
Harrison Matthews, in the “Foreword” to the 1971 edition of “Origin of Species by Natural Selection”, by Charles Darwin states that “Belief in evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation - both are concepts which believers know to be true but neither, up to the present, has been capable of proof.”
An Objective statement of fact!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Is This Science? “Since Darwin, every knowing person agrees that man is descended from the apes. ... Today, of course, there is no such thing as the theory of evolution; it is the fact of evolution. The only arguments now are over technical problems, but the basic fact of evolution is so clearly established that no scientist worries about it any more.” - so states Ernst Mayr, professor of Biology at Harvard. A Subjective statement!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
1 Scientific Methodology
Make observations Develop a hypothesis or theory that explains the observations Conduct experiments to test accuracy and predictions made by the theory Draw conclusions Repeat experiments to verify results and eliminate sources of inaccuracy
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Theory Criteria
To apply scientific methodology, the theory must meet these criteria: Must be falsifiable or verifiable Must make quantifiable predictions Experimental results must be repeatable Must be as simplistic as possible with no unnecessary components (Occam’s Razor) Adherence to the methodology allows for self- correction and increases confidence in the assumptions made by scientific philosophy
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Models of Origins We can neither observe nor repeat “origins” Origins “theories” cannot be tested or proven We have two models (not theories) of origins Creation and evolution Models can be compared as to their respective capacities for correlating observable data Evolutionists regard evolution as “a proven fact.” They believe that evolutionism is science and that creationism is religion Evolutionists are unable to prove evolution Thousands of scientists believe in creation
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
2 Evolution Model
Cannot be proved: It operates too slowly to be measurable (if it is taking place) The scientific method cannot be used to measure it Small variations in organisms, observed today, are not relevant (can’t be used to distinguish between creation and evolution)
Dr. Heribert-Nilsson, Director of the Botanical Institute at Lund University, Sweden, said “My attempt to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years has completely failed. … The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief.” (Synthetische Artbildung, 1953). @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Evolution Model - 2
Explains origin, development and meaning of all things in terms of natural laws and processes which operate today as they have in the past No extraneous processes requiring an external agent (i.e. a Creator) are permitted The universe in all respects evolves itself into higher levels of order (particles to people), elements -> complex chemicals -> simple living systems -> complex life -> man
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Creation Model Cannot be proved: Creation is not happening now, so far as can be observed The scientific method cannot repeat creation Cannot ascertain whether creation took place (except through divine revelation)
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
3 Creation Model - 2 Involves a process of special creation in the beginning All the basic laws and categories of nature brought into existence by special creative processes which are no longer in operation today Distinct kinds exist today as they have existed in the past Processes of creation replaced by processes of conservation
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Which Model Best Fits The Facts?
Creation and Evolution are the only two models of origins Both models should be considered as equal alternatives and evaluated objectively in terms of their relative abilities to correlate and explain scientific data The model that incorporates the most data and has the smallest number of unresolved issues is the most likely to be true
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Basic Predictions of The Models
Category Basic Predictions of Basic Predictions of Evolution Model Creation Model Galactic universe Galaxies changing Galaxies constant
Structure of stars Stars changing into other types Stars unchanged
Other heavenly bodies Building up Breaking down
Types of rock formations Different in different “ages” Similar in all “ages"
Appearance of life Life evolving from non-life Life only from life
Array of organisms Continuum of organisms Distinct kinds of organisms
Appearance of kinds of life New kinds appearing No new kinds appearing
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
4 Basic Predictions of The Models - 2
Category Basic Predictions of Basic Predictions of Evolution Model Creation Model Mutations in organisms Beneficial Harmful
Natural selection Creative process Conservative process
Fossil record Innumerable transitions Systematic gaps
Appearance of man Ape-human intermediates No ape-human intermediates Nature of man Quantitatively superior to animals Qualitatively distinct from animals Origin of civilization Slow and gradual Contemporaneous with man
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Looking At The Scientific Evidence
Origin of matter, energy and natural law Origin of the solar system Teleology – study of evidences of design in nature, e.g. Anthropic Principle Classification of biological organisms Natural selection and mutations (vestigal organs)
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Scientific Evidence - 2
Origin of man Origin of life – probability The fossil record Geologic ages – Uniformitarianism vs. Catastrophism Age of the earth
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
5 Origin of Matter, Energy & Natural Law Evolution model predicts: Matter, energy and laws are still evolving Must have evolved in the past since there is no external agent to bring evolution to a stop Systems can evolve to higher levels of complexity Creation model predicts: Basic laws would not now be changing Fundamental nature of matter and energy would not now be changing Finished in the past, conserved in the present Matter should go from order to disorder
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Natural Laws
The first two laws of thermodynamics are constant: The total energy of any system remains the same The entropy of a system increases over time Other constant laws include: Law of gravity Conservation of momentum Conservation of electric charge Did natural laws evolve? There is no evidence of this
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
First Cause – Divine or Matter?
The First Cause of Limitless Space – must be infinite The First Cause of Endless Time – must be eternal The First Cause of Boundless Energy – must be omnipotent The First Cause of Universal Interrelationships – must be omnipresent The First Cause of Infinite Complexity – must be omniscient The First Cause of Moral Values – must be moral The First Cause of Spiritual Values – must be spiritual The First Cause of Human Responsibility – must be volitional The First Cause of Human Integrity – must be truthful The First Cause of Human Love – must be loving The First Cause of Life – must be living
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
6 Conceptual Systems of Science Cause and Effect - an omnipotent Creator is an adequate cause for all observable effects in the universe Energy Conservation – energy can be converted from one form into another, but can neither be created nor destroyed Classification and Order - table of chemical elements, biological taxonomy, hierarchy of star types. All entities are in a state of flux in the evolution model Processes - all processes are well-defined and orderly. If not, there is no point to scientific study. Creation predicts “purpose” and “meaning” @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama These systems all favor the creation model!
Conceptual Systems of Science - 2 Forces and Fields - types of forces in nature (electromagnetic, gravitational, nuclear and weak) have always acted the same from the beginning. These forces did not evolve Environmental Interdependence – the environment coupled with natural selection constitutes a powerful mechanism to conserve the created kinds and balance of nature Energy Decay – changes always tend to go in a “downward” direction such that there results a net decrease in the “availability” of the converted energy for further useful work
These systems all favor the creation model! @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
More on 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
2nd Law - The entropy of a system increases with time Entropy is defined as “a measure of the quantity of energy not capable of conversion into work” 2nd Law holds in the fields of classical thermodynamics (unavailability of energy for further work), statistical thermodynamics (decreased order of the system’s structure), as well as in informational thermodynamics (lost/distorted information) Creation predicts and is supported by the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics
Let’s see what Dr. Gish [ICR] has to say …
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
7 Conditions For Increasing Complexity in an Open System
Necessary, but not sufficient conditions: 1. Open System 2. Available Energy Additional requirements: 3. Mechanism for storing and converting incoming energy 4. Program (to “direct” the growth of complexity)
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping Score
Creation Evolution
Laws of Thermodynamics TOTAL = 1 0
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Origin of The Solar System Predictions of evolution model: Solar system is one of many Earth, moon and planets should have same composition and structure Predictions of creation model: Solar system is unique Earth, moon and planets each created for a specific purpose, each with a distinctive composition and structure Only the earth would be found to have a hydrosphere capable of supporting life Only the earth would be found to have an atmosphere capable of supporting life Evidence of decay and catastrophism would be found on other planets and moons @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
8 Big Bang Theory
All energy and matter was crammed into a cosmic egg (or primeval atom) Where did it come from? How did it get there? Suddenly exploded/expanded at great speed Nothing -> today’s universe? First there was nothing – then there was a Big Bang! Two elements were created: Hydrogen (75%) Helium (25%)
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Big Bang Theory - 2 These simple gases expanded Perfect vacuum at very low temperature Everything in the universe evolved from these simple gases: Stars, galaxies, solar system All living things, including man with: 30 trillion cells of about 200 different kinds Brain with 12 billion brain cells and 120 trillion connections Chaos & Disorder -> Complex Universe
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
9 The Solar System Was Created
Based on statistical analysis and the evolution model: One might expect to find many solar systems with planets and similar characteristics to our solar system The evolution model also assumes that the moon broke away from the earth What we find: Our solar system is unique Earth and moon have vastly different structure and composition and could not have come from the same celestial “ancestor” The chemical makeup of the moon rocks is very different from that of rocks on the earth The predictions of the creation model are exactly confirmed by moon landings and space probes
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping Score
Creation Evolution Laws of Thermodynamics Origin of Solar System TOTAL = 2 0
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Teleology Teleology is the study of evidences of design in nature The word is derived from the Greek word for end or purpose. Evolution predicts: Mechanistic self-ordering process in nature Mutations provide random changes Natural selection concentrates the beneficial features Creation predicts: Evidence of design in nature Carefully balanced equations, constants and properties of matter @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
10 The Anthropic Principle
The Anthropic Principle states that the universe appears to be carefully designed for the well-being of mankind Some evidence of this found in nature: Mass of proton Gravitation force Strength of electrical charges Distance of moon from the earth Distance of sun from the earth etc.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Mass of Proton Mass of proton is chosen for stability Mass of free neutron is slightly heavier than that of a proton, and it decays to a proton, electron, and an antineutrino with a half life of 12 minutes. Free neutrons cannot persist in nature. If the mass of a proton were increased by just 0.2 %, it would decay into a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. This decay does not occur - if it did hydrogen could not exist. Hydrogen is the dominant element of the universe. Without it, the universe could not exist
Evidence of a precise design! @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Gravitation Force Gravitation force is inversely proportional to the square of the separation distance between the two masses. This fundamental force holds the universe together, controlling the orbits of all members of our planetary system. Why is the number not 1.99 or 2.01? Any value other than 2 would lead to an eventual catastrophic decay of orbits and of the entire universe
Evidence of an essential design! @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
11 Strength of Electrical Charges
The strength of electrical charges, i.e. the Coulomb force varies as the inverse square of the distance between the charges. Since the electrical force is much stronger than the gravitational force, it has been measured to an accuracy of 16 decimal places to be 2.0000000000000000 This reflects God’s purposeful planning!
More on the “Just Right” Universe by Dr. Ray Bohlin of Probe Ministries in next 14 slides …
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
29 Fine-tuned Parameters to the Universe Constants in equations for gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces Ratio of proton to electron mass
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
51 Fine-tuned Parameters to our Galaxy, Solar System, and Planet Distance from the sun Size, temperature, & type of sun Size, axial tilt, rotation speed, moon, & composition of earth Stability of Jupiter and Saturn
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
12 A “Just Right” Universe
10–53 - Probability of all 80 fine-tuned parameters occurring by chance
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
10 22 -Upper limit for number of stars in the universe Assume 1 planet per star Therefore 1022 planets in the universe
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
So how do we determine how many planets may be suitable for life? 10 -53 x 10 22 = 10 -31 or 0.0000000000000000000000000000001 planets suitable for life
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
13 A “Just Right” Universe
Jupiter acts as a comet and asteroid magnet shielding earth from catastrophic collisions Our sun is located between spiral arms of the Milky Way Galaxy where there are fewer stars (less harmful radiation and disruptive gravity) and less gas and dust (we can see the rest of the galaxy and universe)
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
Since 1996, over 50 planets outside our solar system have been found Only 5% of stars have planets The planets are either too large, too close to their star, or with too erratic an orbit to harbor life Have the probabilities changed?
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
14 A “Just Right” Universe
There are now 123 parameters with a probability of 1 in 10161. When multiplied with a very generous estimate of 1 planet/star or 1022 planets, the final number of planets in the universe suitable for life is 10-139 or 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000001 planets
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
A “Just Right” Universe
CNN (2/5/01) just released an article reporting that some astronomers have hatched a plan to move earth’s orbit Sun is going to increase in size and heat output over the next few billion years eventually making earth uninhabitable Move the earth farther out (41 million miles) gradually by passing a 62 mile diameter asteroid within 10,000 miles of earth every 6,000 years 1 million fly bys should do it
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
But, . . .
“If the asteroid comes too close, it might break up or conceivably even slam into Earth.” “Another possible side effect . . . would be to increase the planet's rotation. The encounters would have to be planned so that while some would cause the Earth to spin faster, others would slow it down back to normal rotation speed.” “It's also possible that the moon would be thrown from its orbit around the Earth during these fly-bys.”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
15 What Does Evolution Say? Evolution is unable to deal with such permanent properties of nature Max Planck (1858-1947), a Nobel Prize winner and founder of modern physics, stated: “According to everything taught by the exact sciences about the immense realm of nature, a certain order prevails - one independent of the human mind … this order can be formulated in terms of purposeful activity. There is evidence of an intelligent order of the universe to which both man and nature are subservient.”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Keeping Score
Creation Evolution Laws of Thermodynamics Origin of Solar System Teleology (Design) TOTAL = 3 0
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Classification of Biological Organisms The evolution model predicts: A continuum of all forms of life No classification system would work The creation model predicts: An array of clear-but distinct organisms similar structures for similar functions, e.g. eyes different structures for different functions, e.g. gills for fish, lungs for man Science of taxonomy distinct kinds/species
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
16 The Science of Taxonomy The science of taxonomy is a problem for evolution The classification system introduced by Carolus Linnaeus applies to plants/animals in today’s world as well as to extinct plants and animals A continuum of life forms does not exist Intermediates have not been observed and/or identified in the fossils The classification system introduced by Linnaeus still works today
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Quoting an Evolutionist
The anti-creationist, Niles Eldredge, wrote in 1985: “And though a few of these eighteenth- century systematists had vaguely evolutionary notions, nearly all were devoutly and orthodoxly religious. They saw the order in their material, the grand pattern of similarity running through the entire organic realm, as evidence of God’s plan of creation.”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Classification Observations
What we do see is: Variations within species, e.g. varieties of cats, dogs, cows, horses, mankind No new kinds produced Some kinds become extinct Like begets like
Chalk up another one for the Creation Model!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
17 Natural Selection and Mutations
Evolution model predicts: Small variations between members of a species would confer differing degrees of advantage or disadvantage in the struggle for existence Those with significant advantages would be favored New and higher types of organisms would emerge A mutation (structural change in a gene) is the source of genetic variation Mutations are primarily beneficial
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Natural Selection and Mutations - 2
Creation model predicts: Variation and natural selection work to assure genetic integrity and to enable the organism to survive in nature Characteristics can be adjusted, within limits, to changes in the environment Mutations are primarily harmful
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What We See Happening Today Variations within a kind, e.g. peppered moth “evolving” to darker color as tree trunks grew darker with pollutants during industrial revolution Adaptation to the environment for survival Mutations are harmful to the organism Mutations are random and not directed Mutations are rare in occurrence Mutations almost always generate misfits which soon die out
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
18 “Origin of Species” Never Observed All of Darwin’s evidences turn out to be descriptions of creative adaptation, not origin According to Niles Eldridge (1986): “Darwin, it is now become commonplace to acknowledge, never really addressed the ‘origin of species’ in his book of that title.” Darwin never really cited the origin of a new species by natural selection The British evolutionist Colin Patterson noted: “No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever gotten near it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this question.” @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
On Mutations and Natural Selection
The philosopher Janus Koestler noted that: “The public continues to believe that Darwin provided all the relevant answers by the magic formula of random mutations plus natural selection - quite unaware of the fact that random mutations turned out to be irrelevant and natural selections a tautology.” Mutations turn out to be rare events, and most of those are bad They do not lead to improvements in the species, as evolution predicts
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Vestigal Organs The argument that vestigial organs prove evolution is no longer regarded as valid No useless vestiges of structures which were useful in a former evolutionary stage All “vestigial” organs in man now appear to have a use At one time there were claimed to be 180 such organs in man
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
19 The Origin of Man
Evolution model predicts: Man evolved from an ape Creation model predicts: Man’s appearance has remained largely the same
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Ape To Man? In a Science Digest article written by Lyall Watson, he states that: “The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin.” David Pilbeam and Steven Gould (two evolutionists) report that: “Unfortunately, the fossil record of pongids (apes) is nonexistent, making a glaring deficiency in the whole story.” @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Famous “Hominid” Fossils
Neanderthal Man – 1856 Java Man – 1891 Piltdown Man – 1908 Nebraska Man – 1922 Ramapithecus – 1930 Lucy - 1974
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
20 Neanderthal Man Fossil fragments first found in France – 1856 Skull cap and some limb bones Diagnosed as human with deformed vertebrae Neanderthal Man’s Site in Krapina, 1899-1999 Another almost complete skeleton found in 1908 Reconstructed by Marcelle Boule to look ape-like Based on pre-conceived evolutionary notions Faulty reconstruction recognized in 1957 Neanderthal is now known to be fully human with a bone deformity School textbooks still portray as man’s ancestor @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Java Man
Discovered by Eugene Dubois in 1891 Ape-like skull cap Human-like thigh bone found 50 feet away one year later Assumed they went together Fossils dated at 500,000 years (guesswork based on assumed evolutionary model) In 1940 Dubois admitted He found two human skulls in same area as the human thigh bone Java Man now regarded as a hoax Still included in textbooks as support for evolution @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Piltdown Man Fossil fragments found in 1908 Part of a human skull and part of a lower ape-like jaw Estimated to be 500,000 years old Discovered to be a fraud in 1953 Lower jaw and tooth were from orangutan Tooth had been filed Parts of lower jaw broken to hide the fact that it did not fit with the skull Skull was dated at ~620 years old and dyed to appear old
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
21 Nebraska Man Discovered in 1922 Dated to be one million years old Fossil was only a single tooth Complete model of Nebraska Man, his family and environment was constructed Tooth discovered to be pig’s tooth in 1928 Still cited as evidence for evolution in the 1940’s
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Ramapithecus Found in India in 1930’s Considered a human ancestor Based on some jaw fragments and a few teeth More fossil evidence found in 1970’s Baboons in Ethiopia have same teeth structure as Ramapithecus Now discarded as a possible “missing link” Had been published as factual evidence of human evolution worldwide
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Lucy Discovered in 1974 by Donald Johanson 40% complete skeleton Dated at 3.5 million years old Evidence: Arm/leg ratio of 83.9 % Hip/pelvis – walked upright Knee joint – walked upright
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
22 Lucy - 2
Digging deeper, we find that: Leg bone broken in two places and one end was crushed -> this invalidates the ratio Hip/pelvis was incomplete, and thus reshaped to make it look as if it walked upright Knee joint was found over one mile away and 200 feet deeper in strata from rest of bones Fossil remains of two different creatures fitted to form a make-believe creature
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Summary of “Hominid” Fossils
Neanderthal Man – accepted as homo sapiens Java Man – artificial construct Piltdown Man – proven to be a hoax Nebraska Man – an extinct pig Ramapithecus – an orangutan Lucy – make-believe creature Another one for the Creation Model!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Lord Zuckerman Chimes In
“For example, no scientist could logically dispute the proposition that man, without having been involved in any act of divine creation, evolved from some ape-like creature in a very short space of time – speaking in geological terms – without leaving any fossil traces of the steps of the transformation.”
Zuckerman, Solly. 1971. Beyond the ivory tower: The frontiers of public and private science. New York: Taplinger Publishing Company. p. 64. @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
23 Origin of Life - Probability
What is the probability that an explosion in a junk yard would “create” a car? What is the probability of creating a Boeing airplane from such an explosion? What is the probability of 200 monkeys pawing away at a typewriter could “write” a Shakespeare play?
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Origin of Life – Probability - 2
Take 200 parts and line them up in a specific order 200! ways of aligning these parts = 10**375 Try a new alignment 1 billion times a second Assuming 20 billion years of time, we have 20 * 10**18 seconds The probability of finding the right alignment is practically zero Living organisms contain many more than 200 parts Human being contains 100 million cells Only 10**80 “infinestimal” particles in the whole universe
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Probability of Synthesis
Of DNA Molecule: Medium protein includes about 300 amino acids Too complex to arise by chance [no matter how long the time or how big the universe] By gradual accretion System might advance from one part to a two-part system, then to three parts, etc. Requires each step to be immediately beneficial Probability of success would be incalculably small
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
24 The Fossil Record The theory of evolution is based on two major suppositions: Mutations and natural selection supposedly provided the mechanism The fossil record allegedly proved the “fact” of evolution Fossils should “prove” evolution since the fossil record has long been considered as the main evidence for evolution The creation model predicts that organisms preserved as fossils will correspond to the same classification system as applicable to present-day plants and animals @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 2 Evolution model predicts: Many preliminary forms Many transitional forms Randomly distributed gaps between present kinds and transitional forms Basic taxonomic categories should have been evolving Creation model predicts: No preliminary forms No transitional forms Clear gaps between types Same taxonomic categories as at present @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 3
“Creation and evolution, between them, exhaust the possible explanations for the origin of living things. Organisms either appeared on the earth fully developed or they did not. If they did not they must have developed from preexisting species by some process of modification. If they did appear in fully formed state, they must have been created by some omnipotent intelligence.”
D. J. Futuyma, Science on Trial, 1983
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
25 The Fossil Record - 4
Darwin admitted in 1859: “Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain.” Paul Moody wrote in a standard textbook: “So far as we can judge from the geologic record, large changes seem usually to have arisen suddenly. ... fossil forms, intermediate between large subdivisions of classification, such as orders and classes, are seldom [read never] found.”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 5 Evolutionists say we should find transitional forms: Single cell to multi-cell creatures Invertebrate to vertebrate Fish to reptile Reptile to bird Ape to man To date no true transitional fossil forms have been discovered
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record - 6 “I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. . .I will lay it on the line, There is not one such fossil for which one might make a watertight argument.”
-- Dr. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History
140 years after Darwin, and still no credible transition form! @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
26 Coelacanth – A “Living Fossil” Coelacanth fish Known by paleontologists of 19th and 20th centuries from the fossil record “Extinct” about 70 million years ago Candidate forerunner to first land animals Living specimens Found off west coast of Madagascar in 1938 More found later No longer considered a link in evolutionary chain Another evolution “theory” debunked!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Fully Formed
“It is considered likely that all the animal phyla became distinct before or during the Cambrian, for they all appear fully formed, without intermediates connecting one phylum to another.”
Futuyma, Douglas J. 1986. Evolutionary biology. 2d ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. p. 325.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Fossil Record Summarized Missing links are still missing Different types of “living fossils” found Sudden appearance of fully formed fossils in the “Cambrian Explosion” The same “kinds” still appear today Some species are now extinct No new kinds evolved Supports the Creation Model!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
27 Source: Dr. Duane Gish, ICR @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Geologic Record
Evolution model predicts: Uniformitarianism Sediment layers deposited gradually More complex fossils in higher layers Creation model predicts: Catastrophism Evidence for global flood Sudden appearance of fully formed fossils
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Conventional History Of The Earth 0 Cenozoic Human fossils Mesozoic Last dinosaur fossils 500 Paleozoic First reptile fossils
First land plant fossils 1,000 -First multicellular animal fossils 1,500 -First eukaryotic fossils 2,000 Precambrian 2,500 -Atmospheric Oxygen accumulation (from cyanobacteria) 3,000 3,500 -First fossil prokaryotes Origin of life Millions of Years BP Years of Millions 4,000 -Crust forms
4,500 -Formation of the earth@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
28 The Geological Column
Miocene Cenozoic Oligocene
Eocene
Tertiary Paleocene Extinction of dinosaurs and many families
100 - Cretaceous Mammals, cycads, conifers, angiosperms Mesozoic Jurassic Dinosaurs 200 - Triassic Conifers, more reptiles and amphibians Permian Many crinoids, amphibia and reptiles 300 -
Phanerozoic Carboniferous Coal “forests” many primitive land plants 400 - Paleozoic Devonian “The age of fish” small land plants Silurian Jawless fish, strange land plants Ordovician Many marine organisms including bryozoa 500 -
Cambrian Many fossils, all modern phyla ex. bryozoa
Proterozoic Few fossils
Millions of Years Before PresentBefore Years of Millions Ediacarian fauna (odd marine organisms) Very few fossils, maybe none Archean Many pseudo fossils Precambrian @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Geologic Time Scale [with fossils]
Geologic Column Chart
29 Geologic Column [some more details]
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Geologic Column Theory
Cambrian rocks began to form ~ 600My ago [now believed to be 520-530My ago] Cambrian period estimated to be ~ 80My [now believed to be 5-10My] Precambrian rocks laid down during the prior hundreds of millions of years Should contain fossils of evolutionary ancestors of the complex vertebrates Should contain fossils of transitional forms linking the complex vertebrates to common ancestors
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What Do We Find? Fossils of microscopic, soft-bodied, single-celled organisms, such as bacteria and algae in Precambrian rocks No fossilized ancestors for any Cambrian invertebrate No trace of transitional forms between the various kinds of invertebrates, e.g. No linking sponges with jellyfish No linking snails with trilobites Fossils of a vast array of complex invertebrates abruptly appear fully formed in the Cambrian rocks
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
30 The Geologic Column The “column” is not the column that textbooks describe: It rarely exists in its entirety in one location All types of rocks, minerals, metals are found in all ages and strata A progression of fossils through the ages “documents” evolution: That’s errant, “circular reasoning”: i.e. fossils date rocks, yet the rocks date the fossils (evolution is assumed)
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
The Geologic Column
The creation / abrupt appearance column is the result of a world flood: Sorting action of water (smaller fossils end up going to bottom) Ordered destruction of different habitats The geologic column illustrates a superficially valid “successional tendency”, but it represents a very fast time sequence, not slow Mt. St. Helens created a “mini Grand Canyon” in days, and petrified wood in less than ten years!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What Does Richard Dawkins Say? “The Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600 million years, are the oldest in which we find most of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say, this appearance of sudden planting has delight creationists.”
Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker. 1987.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
31 What Does Douglas Futuyma Say?
“It is considered likely that all the animal phyla became distinct before or during the Cambrian, for they all appear fully formed, without intermediates connecting one form to another.”
Douglas Futuyma, Evolutionary Biology, 2nd Ed. 1986
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
What We Find In The Fossils
Same gaps in fossils records as in the organisms found today All kingdoms and subkingdoms are represented in the geologic record from the Cambrian onward All phyla of the animal kingdom are represented from the Cambrian onward All orders and families (as well as kingdoms, phyla, and classes) appear suddenly in the fossil record, with no indication of transitional forms from earlier types
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Animal and Plant Kingdom Fossils All classes of the animal kingdom are represented from the Cambrian onward, except: Moss-coral (Ordovician onward) Insects (Devonian onward) Graptolites (Cambrian to Carboniferous) Trilobites (Cambrian to Permian) All phyla of the plant kingdom are represented from the Triassic onward, except: Bacteria, algae, fungi (Precambrian onward) Bryophytes, pteridophytes (Silurian onward) Spermophytes (Carboniferous onward) Diatoms (Jurassic onward) @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
32 The Origin of Vertebrates Fish believed to be the first vertebrate Origin appears sudden and dramatic All three subdivisions of the bony fishes appear in the fossil record at about the same time Errol White, an evolutionist and expert on fishes, stated: “But whatever ideas authorities may have on the subject, the lungfishes, like very other major group of fishes that I know, have their origins firmly based in nothing.”
E. White, Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. 1996.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Conclusions Laws of science consistent with Creationism Signs of intelligence in the universe The probability of life from non-life is zero Abrupt appearance of fully-formed animals The missing links are still missing Man did not evolve from apes Catastrophism explains the “geologic column” There is no credible evidence for evolution! Science supports Creationism @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
Which Model Fits The Evidence Best?
So far … Creation 9 Evolution 0 Next … Age of the earth?
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama
33