DOCSLIB.ORG

MINISTRY of ROAD TRANSPORT and HIGHWAYS (Government of India)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MINISTRY of ROAD TRANSPORT and HIGHWAYS (Government of India) Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (Government of India) Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Rehabilitation and Upgrading to 2-Lane/2-Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration and Strengthening from Km 0+000 (Paonta) to Km 97+000 (Gumma) of NH-707 in the State of Himachal Pradesh (Package No. SP/C/5) Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT VOLUME-V : SIA & RAP REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Gumma NH- 707 Paonta Sahib DECEMBER – 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 8 E.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND & INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 8 E.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 9 E.3 SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA ............................................... 10 E.4 R & R PRINCIPLES, POLICY FRAME WORK & ENTITLEMENT MATRIX ............... 10 E.5 STAKEHOLDER'S CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE ......................................... 10 E.6 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................................... 11 E.7 PROJECT IMPACTS ........................................................................................................... 11 E.8 GENDER ISSUE & WOMENS PARTICIPATION ............................................................ 12 E.9 REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT BUDGET ........................................................ 13 E.10 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR RAP IMPLEMENTATION .......................... 13 E.11 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MACHANISM ...................................................................... 13 E.12 MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) .................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 1: PROJECT BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ................................................ 15 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND................................................................................................. 15 1.2 PROJECT ROAD DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 16 1.3 IMPORTANCE AND NEED FOR PROJECT ..................................................................... 18 1.4 SCOPE OF IMPACT ............................................................................................................ 19 1.5 OBJECTIVE OF SIA AND RAP ......................................................................................... 20 1.6 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 21 CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRITION ................................................................................................ 1 2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 1 2.3 EXISTING ROAD AND STRUCTURES .............................................................................. 2 2.4 CORRIDOR OF IMPACT (COI) ........................................................................................... 4 2.5 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................................. 5 2.5.1 PROPOSED DESIGN STANDARDS FOR HIGHWAY .................................................. 5 2.5.2 INTERSECTION/JUNCTION – WITH IMPROVEMENT OF CROSS ROAD ........... 7 2.5.3 IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL FOR BRIDGES AND CULVERTS .......................... 11 2.5.4 SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES ...................................................................... 11 2.5.5 BIOENGINEERING ..................................................................................................... 12 2.5.6 PROJECT FACILITIES ............................................................................................... 12 2.5.7 OTHER FEATURES .................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA ......................................... 1 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 3.2 SOCIO- ECONOMIC STATUS OF PROJECT INFLUENCE DISTRICTS ......................... 1 3.2.1 SHIMLA & SIRMAUR DISTRICT PROFILE .............................................................. 1 3.3 PROJECT IMPACT AREA .................................................................................................... 3 3.3.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILING ................................................................................ 3 3.3.2 DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS .......................................................................................... 1 3.3.3 LITERACY STATUS ..................................................................................................... 1 3.3.4 WORKING AND NON- WORKING POPULATION. ................................................. 1 3.3.5 EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITIES................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 4: R&R PRINCIPLES, POLICY FRAMEWORK & ENTITLEMENT MATRIX ............. 1 4.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 4.2 APPLICABLE LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ...................................................... 1 4.3 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APPLICABLE POLICY ................................................ 2 4.4 RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK ....................................................................... 3 4.4.1 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................ 4 4.5 RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ..................................... 7 4.6 ENTITLEMENT MATRIX .................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 5: STAKEHOLDER’S CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE ................................... 1 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 5.2 METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION ........................ 2 5.3 DETAILS OF STAKEHOLDER’S CONSULTATION ........................................................ 4 5.3.1 DISTRICT LEVEL CONSULTATIONS ....................................................................... 4 5.3.2 LOCAL LEVEL CONSULTATIONS .......................................................................... 11 5.3.3 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE THROUGH MEDIA ................................................ 1 5.4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF ALL TYPE OF CONSULTATIONS ................................ 1 5.5 WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION IN CONSULTATIONS AND OUT COMES ...................... 2 5.6 DISCLOSURE ........................................................................................................................ 3 5.7 FRAMEWORK FOR CONTINUED CONSULTATION ...................................................... 3 5.8 SUGGESTION AND COMPLAINT HANDLING MECHANISM (SCHM) ....................... 5 CHAPTER 6: ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES AND MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS ................. 1 6.1 GENERAL .............................................................................................................................. 1 6.2 “WITH” AND “WITHOUT” PROJECT SCENARIO ........................................................... 1 6.3 SAFETY ASPECTS ............................................................................................................... 4 6.4 WHY ALTERNATIVE FOR REALIGNMENT AND BYPASSES ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS ROAD ..................................................................................................... 4 6.5 MINIMIZATION OF LAND UPTAKE BY PROVIDING INTERMEDIATE CARRIAGEWAY............................................................................................................................... 4 6.6 MINIMIZATION OF LAND UPTAKE BY ELIMINATING PAVED SHOULDERS ........ 5 CHAPTER 7: SOCIAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................ 6 7.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 6 7.2 LAND AVAILABILITY ........................................................................................................ 7 7.3 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT..................................................................... 7 7.4 IMPACT ON LAND ............................................................................................................... 7 7.5 IMPACT ON STRUCTURES ................................................................................................ 9 7.5.1 IMPACT ON STRUCTURES BY USAGE OF STRUCTURE ..................................... 9 7.5.2 IMPACT ON STRUCTURES BY TYPOLOGY OF STRUCTURE ............................. 9 7.5.3 IMPACT ON COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES (CPRS) ................................... 10 7.5.4 OWNERSHIP STATUS OF PRIVATE STRUCTURES ............................................. 10 7.5.5 AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS & PERSONS ................................................................ 11 7.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COURSE REPORT “Community Forestry & Joint Forest Management”
    COURSE REPORT on “Community Forestry & Joint Forest Management” 19th to 24th September, 2016 for In-service SFS Officers & Senior RFOs Govt. of India Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change Central Academy for State Forest Service Dehradun Format for reporting evaluation of refresher course conducted by the institute/organization for the SFS officers sponsored by the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, GOI, New Delhi as per the merged format of MoEF & CC and JICA Course Report MoEF’s /DFE’s letter number and date 4-651/Trg-11/DFT-2016/1104-44 dated 09.06.16 Institute’s reference number 4-21/Trg./WL/CASFOS-16-1884 dated 22.07.2016 Central Academy for SFS, Dehradun Name and complete address of the 01352-2754575/2754648 1 Institute(including phone, fax and e-mail) Fax- 0135-2756168 Email- [email protected] 2 Title of the course “Community Forestry & Joint Forest Management” Six Days. 3 Duration & period of the Course From 19th to 24th September, 2016 Name & designation of the Course 4 Abhilash Damodaran, IFS, Faculty Director 5 Number of officers participated 31(Details at Appendix- IV) (a)Did the institute get in touch in advance Yes with the participants of the course? (b) If yes, when (mention the date of 05.07.2016 communication to the officers)? 6.1 (c) Details of nomination received from 49 States prior to the Course (d) How many officers received the All intimation? (e) How many officers responded? 31 (a)Were the course expectations of the participants ascertained by the Yes 6.2 institution? By direct interaction and in form of feedback on prescribed (b) If yes, how and when (dates)? performa collected during the course.
    [Show full text]
  • Sirmaur District, Himachal Pradesh
    Series-E For official use only Government of India Ministry of Water Resources CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER INFORMATION BOOKLET SIRMAUR DISTRICT, HIMACHAL PRADESH NORTHERN HIMALAYAN REGION DHARAMSALA September, 2013 2013 जल संरषण व्ष 2013 जल संरण वषx 2013 Ground Water Information Booklet Sirmaur District, Himachal Pradesh CONTENTS DISTRICT AT A GLANCE Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 CLIMATE & RAINFALL 3 3.0 GEOMORPHOLOGY & SOILS 3 4.0 GROUND WATER SCENARIO 4 4.1 Hydrogeology 4 4.2 Ground Water Resources 10 4.3 Ground Water Quality 12 4.4 Status of Ground Water Development 12 5.0 GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 13 5.1 Ground Water Development 13 5.2 Water Conservation & Artificial Recharge 15 6.0 GROUND WATER RELATED ISSUES & PROBLEMS 15 7.0 AWARENESS & TRAINING ACTIVITY 16 8.0 AREAS NOTIFIED BY CGWA / SGWA 16 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 17 जल संरण वषx 2013 SIRMAUR DISTRICT AT A GLANCE 1. GENERAL PERTICULARS A. Location : North latitude 30022’00”- 31001”00 & East longitude 77°01’00” - 77050’00” B Area : 2,825 sq. km C. District & Tehsil Headquarter : Nahan D. Number of Tehsils : 6 E. Number of Sub-Tehsils 4 F. Number of Blocks : 5 G. Number of Towns : 3 H. Number of Villages : 968 I. Population Total : 5,29,855 persons (2011) i. Rural : 4,72,690 persons ii Urban : 57,165 persons iii Schedule Caste : 1,60,745 persons iv Scheduled tribes : 11,262 persons J. Work Force i. Cultivators : 1,15,992 persons ii. Agricultural Laborers : 5,953 persons K. Literacy : 68.44 % M.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus Roseus, Siberian Rubythroat Calliope
    Correspondence 193 Four additions to the avifauna of Himachal Pradesh: plumage almost disappeared and they became all white, except Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus, Siberian for the flight feathers and bare parts. There was a hint of pink on Rubythroat Calliope calliope, Rufous Woodpecker their mantles and backs. The last sighting of these two individuals Micropternus brachyurus, and Great Hornbill was on 09 April 2017, by CA [203]. There was no further sighting Buceros bicornis of this species in subsequent winters. Himachal Pradesh is rich in avifauna. More than half of the total species of birds found in India have been reported from the state (Praveen et al. 2020; Dhadwal 2019). CA has been extensively exploring Pong Lake (also known as Maharana Pratap Sagar), a designated Ramsar Site. It is a large man-made reservoir, on the Beas River in Kangra District, with an area of 156.62 sq. km and follows an annual cycle of filling-up in the monsoons, and gradually draining off thereafter (Abhinav et al. 2018). VS and HC frequently explore Colonel Sher Jung National Park, and locations around Renuka Ji and Paonta Sahib in Sirmaur District. Colonel Sher Jung National Park (27.88 sq. km) was previously known as Simbalbara National Park, and is located in the lower Shivalik region of Sirmaur District in southern Himachal Pradesh. It comprises moist Sal Shorea robusta forests and northern dry Both: C. Abhinav mixed deciduous forests (Abhinav et al. 2019). We report here four birds that were first recorded by us in Himachal Pradesh, in chronological order. 203. Greater Flamingo at Nagrota Surian, Pong Lake, on 09 April 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-18 Page 1 and Are Protected by Fairly Extensive Cover of Natural Vegetation
    For Official Use Only GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK HIMACHAL PRADESH (2017-2018) NORTHERN HIMALAYAN REGION DHARAMSHALA (H.P) March, 2019 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES RIVER DEVELOPMENT AND GANGA REJUVENATION CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK HIMACHAL PRADESH (2017-2018) By Rachna Bhatti Vidya Bhooshan Scientist ‘C’ Senior Technical Assistant (Hydrogeology) NORTHERN HIMALAYAN REGION DHARAMSHALA (H.P) March, 2019 GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK HIMACHAL PRADESH 2017-2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Central Ground Water Board, NHR has set up a network of 128 National Hydrograph Stations in the state of Himachal Pradesh. The monitoring commenced in the year 1969 with the establishment of 3 observation wells and since, then the number of monitoring station are being increased regularly so as to get the overall picture of ground water scenario in different hydrogeological set up of the state. Most of the area in Himachal Pradesh is hilly enclosing few small intermontane valleys. The traditional ground water structures under observation at present are dugwells and are mostly located in the valley areas only. Therefore, the ground water regime monitoring programme is concentrated mainly in valley areas of the state and some places in hard rock areas. All the 128 National Hydrograph Stations are located only in 7 districts out of the 12 districts in Himachal Pradesh. The reason being hilly terrain, hard approachability and insignificant number of structures available for monitoring. The average annual rainfall in the state varies from 600 mm to more than 2400 mm. The rainfall increases from south to north.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment (Eia)
    “REHABILITATION AND UPGRADATION TO INTERMEDIATE LANE OF PAONTA SAHIB RAJBAN SHILLAI MEENUS HATKOTI ROAD PORTION BETWEEN KM 97+000 TO 106+120 (GUMMA TO FEDIZ)( DESIGN RD 94+900 TO 103+550) OF NH 707 IN THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH” ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) Submitted To: Executive Engineer, NH Division, HPPWD Nahan. Submitted By: Consulting Engineering Associates S.C.O. 51, 2nd Floor, Swastik Vihar Mansa Devi Road, Sector-5, Panchkula Tel: 0172-2555529, Cell: 099145-75200 E-mail: [email protected] Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for Rehabilitation and Up-gradation to Intermediate lane of Paonta Sahib Rajban Shillai Meenus Hatkoti road portion between Km 97+000 to 106+120 (Gumma to Fediz)( Design RD 94+900 to 103+550) of NH 707 in the state of Himachal Pradesh 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.1.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.2 Importance of Project ......................................................................................................... 9 1.2 THE STUDY METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 12 1.2.1 Environmental Assessment ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of Himachal Pradesh by Arun K
    Mineral Resources Of Himachal Pradesh By Arun K. Sharma , State Geologist , Himachal Pradesh Geological Wing , Department of Industries, Udyog Bhawan , Shimla-1 , Himachal Pradesh -171009 Rajneesh Sharma, Geologist, Geological Wing , Department of Industries, Udyog Bhawan , Shimla-1 , Himachal Pradesh -171009 Dr. H. R. Dandi Geologist, Geological Wing , Department of Industries, Udyog Bhawan , Shimla-1 , Himachal Pradesh -171009 i Mineral Resources of Himachal Pradesh Arun K. Sharma , Rajneesh Sharma, Dr. H. R. Dandi Contents Content Page No 1 Introduction 1 2 Minerals 1 3 Mineral Deposits 2 3.1 Igneous Minerals 3 3.2 Metamorphic Minerals. 3 3.3 Sedimentary Minerals. 3 3.4 Hydrothermal minerals. 4 4 Distinctive Characters of the Minerals 4 4.1 Color 4 4.2 Streak 4 4.3 Luster 4 4.4 Hardness 4 4.5 Specific Gravity 5 4.6 Cleavage 5 4.7 Crystal form 6 5 Mineral Resource 6 5.1 Inferred Mineral Resource 6 5.2 Indicated Mineral Resource 6 5.3 Measured Mineral Resource 7 6 Mineral Reserve 7 6.1 Probable Mineral Reserve 7 6.2 Proven Mineral Reserve 7 7 Distinctive Characters of the Mineral Deposit 7 8 Importance of Mineral Resources 8 9 Global Scenario 8 9.1 History 8 9.2 Modern mineral history 10 10 National Scenario 12 10.1 Past history 12 10.2 Pre Independence era 13 10.3 Post Independence Period 13 10.4 Present mining scenario 14 ii 11 Geology of Himachal Pradesh 21 11.1 Sub-Himalayas 22 11.2 Lesser Himalayas 22 11.3 Higher Himalayas 23 11.4 Geological Structural Belts 24 11.4.1 Siwalik Autochthon to Parautochthon Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Annual Rainfall in Himachal Pradesh and Its Implication in Farming
    Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 42(2): 115-125 (2016) Spatial distribution of annual rainfall in Himachal Pradesh and its implication in farming Rajendra Prasad and Anupam Sharma Department of Agronomy, Forages and Grassland Management, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176062, India. Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 21 August 2016; Accepted: 20 December 2016 Abstract Spatial distribution of annual rainfall and rainy days, dependable rainfall and rainfall trends in Himachal Pradesh was assessed using rainfall data(1971-2014) of 40 rain gauge stations. The normal annual rainfall of Himachal Pradesh was observed to be 1267 ± 375 mm spreading over 66 rainy days. Highest annual rainfall to the tune of 1000 mm at 75% probability was noticed in 16 (with 6 located alone in the Kangra district) out of 40 rain gauge stations. An expected annual rainfall in the range of 400-600 mm was observed in mid and high hill regions of the state comprising districts of Shimla with two stations and Mandi and Kinnaur each with single station. Ten observatories indicated significant decreasing trend in rainfall while seven showed increasing trend. Increasing trend in annual rainfall was observed mainly in Shimla (Kumarsain, Rohru and Shimla) and Mandi (Karsog, Chachiot and Sarkaghat) districts. Ten stations had an increasing trend in number of annual rainy days, whereas, six had decreasing trends. The heavy rainfall event trends were non- significant at most of the stations except Pachhad and Sundernagar where it was observed to be decreasing under 75-100 mm category. In more than 100 mm category, decreasing trend at Palampur, Nurpur, Nichar and Pachhad and increasing at Malan, Berthin and Sarkaghat was observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Fgekpyizns'kljdkj Vkcdkjhvkcavu Dh ?Kks”K.Kk,A O”Kz2021&22
    fgekpyizns’kljdkj GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH vkcdkjhvkcaVu dh ?kks”k.kk,a o”kZ2021&22 ANNOUNCEMENTSFOR THE ALLOTMENT OF RETAIL EXCISE VENDS BY RENEWAL/DRAW OF LOTS/TENDER-CUM-AUCTION FOR THE YEAR 2021-22. 1 jkT; dj ,oavkcdkjhfoHkkx fgekpyizns’k DEPARTMENT OF STATE TAXES AND EXCISE HIMACHAL PRADESH *** ANNOUNCEMENTS TO BE MADE AT THE TIME OF ALLOTMENTBY RENEWALOFTHE EXCISE LICENSES FOR THE RETAIL VENDS OF COUNTRY LIQUOR, FOREIGN LIQUOR AND COUNTRY FERMENTED LIQUOR IN HIMACHAL PRADESH FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2021-22. THE EXCISE POLICY 2021-22 WAS APPROVED BY THE CMM ON DATED 24-05-2021 DATED 24-05-2021 VIDE GOVT. LETTER NO.EXN-F(18)/2021 DATED 25-05-2021. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE Page No. NO. 1. INTRODUCTORY 4 2. MAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PROCEDURE FOR 5-11 ALLOTMENT ON APPLICATION AND BY DRAW OF LOTS 3. MAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PROCEDURE FOR 12-17 BIDDING THROUGH AUCTION-CUM-TENDERS. 4. MAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PROCEDURE FOR 18-21 RENEWAL 5. MINIMUM GUARANTEED QUOTA AND ANNUAL FIXED 22-26 LICENSE FEE 6. DUTIES AND FEES ETC 27-37 7. COUNTRY LIQUOR 38-42 8. FOREIGN LIQUOR 43-47 9. GRANT OF COUNTRY FERMENTED AND DISTILLED 48 LIQUOR LICENSES IN FORM L-20-B, L-20-C, L-20-CC AND L-20-D 10. OBSERVANCE OF DRY DAYS AND SALE HOURS 49 11. NEW LICENSES 50-54 12. MISCELLANEOUS 55-65 13 BIO BRANDS POLICY 66-67 14. ANNEXURE 68-135 3 CHAPTER-I: INTRODUCTORY 1.1 The liquor licenses, shall be granted subject to the provisions of the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011 and the Rules framed thereunder from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sikh Prayer)
    Acknowledgements My sincere thanks to: Professor Emeritus Dr. Darshan Singh and Prof Parkash Kaur (Chandigarh), S. Gurvinder Singh Shampura (member S.G.P.C.), Mrs Panninder Kaur Sandhu (nee Pammy Sidhu), Dr Gurnam Singh (p.U. Patiala), S. Bhag Singh Ankhi (Chief Khalsa Diwan, Amritsar), Dr. Gurbachan Singh Bachan, Jathedar Principal Dalbir Singh Sattowal (Ghuman), S. Dilbir Singh and S. Awtar Singh (Sikh Forum, Kolkata), S. Ravinder Singh Khalsa Mohali, Jathedar Jasbinder Singh Dubai (Bhai Lalo Foundation), S. Hardarshan Singh Mejie (H.S.Mejie), S. Jaswant Singh Mann (Former President AISSF), S. Gurinderpal Singh Dhanaula (Miri-Piri Da! & Amritsar Akali Dal), S. Satnam Singh Paonta Sahib and Sarbjit Singh Ghuman (Dal Khalsa), S. Amllljit Singh Dhawan, Dr Kulwinder Singh Bajwa (p.U. Patiala), Khoji Kafir (Canada), Jathedar Amllljit Singh Chandi (Uttrancbal), Jathedar Kamaljit Singh Kundal (Sikh missionary), Jathedar Pritam Singh Matwani (Sikh missionary), Dr Amllljit Kaur Ibben Kalan, Ms Jagmohan Kaur Bassi Pathanan, Ms Gurdeep Kaur Deepi, Ms. Sarbjit Kaur. S. Surjeet Singh Chhadauri (Belgium), S Kulwinder Singh (Spain), S, Nachhatar Singh Bains (Norway), S Bhupinder Singh (Holland), S. Jageer Singh Hamdard (Birmingham), Mrs Balwinder Kaur Chahal (Sourball), S. Gurinder Singh Sacha, S.Arvinder Singh Khalsa and S. Inder Singh Jammu Mayor (ali from south-east London), S.Tejinder Singh Hounslow, S Ravinder Singh Kundra (BBC), S Jameet Singh, S Jawinder Singh, Satchit Singh, Jasbir Singh Ikkolaha and Mohinder Singh (all from Bristol), Pritam Singh 'Lala' Hounslow (all from England). Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon, S. Joginder Singh (Winnipeg, Canada), S. Balkaran Singh, S. Raghbir Singh Samagh, S. Manjit Singh Mangat, S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnomedicinal Plant Study in Fringe Villages of Col. Sher Jung Nation- Al Park Simbalbara, Sirmour, H.P
    CPUH-Research Journal: 2017, 2(2), 1-16 ISSN (Online): 2455-6076 http://www.cpuh.in/academics/academic_journals.php An Ethnomedicinal Plant Study in Fringe Villages of Col. Sher Jung Nation- al Park Simbalbara, Sirmour, H.P. India Jaswant Singh Saini 1* & S.K. Sood2 1Department of Botany, Govt. College Barsar, Hamirpur (H.P.) INDIA 2Department of Biosciences, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: A series of preliminary research attempt have been initiated in ethnobotany in the Western Himalaya from last three decades. But Col. Sher Jung Park, Simbalbara and its surroundings although rich in plant diversity still excluded in particular. This protected area having altitudinal variation between 350-700m with mean annual rainfall of 1260mm. Present study was planned to collect information of plants used by inhabitants in and around Col. Sher Jung National Park, Simbalbara. Field surveys were conducted during January 2010 to December 2016 in different season to collect data on ethnobotanically important plants from villagers and traditional healers. Total 214 plant species belonging to 69 families were documented having medicinal importance. Among the families rec- orded Fabaceae was the largest with altogether 26 species followed by Poaceae (12 species), Euphorbiaceae (11 spe- cies), Rutaceae (10 species), Lamiaceae and Moraceae with 9 species each. Traditions, customs and cultural rights play a key role in protection of biodiversity and environment. Hence, there is immense need to utilize the ethnobo- tanical information and promote the indigenous people being playing a key role in conserving the biodiversity in real sense. Keywords: Col. Sher Jung Park; Ethnobotany; Fabaceae; Lamiaceae; Moraceae; Poaceae; Rutaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-19 Page 1 and Are Protected by Fairly Extensive Cover of Natural Vegetation
    For Official Use Only GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT AND GANGA REJUVENATION CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK HIMACHAL PRADESH (2018-2019) NORTHERN HIMALAYAN REGION DHARAMSHALA (H.P) January, 2021 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT AND GANGA REJUVENATION CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK HIMACHAL PRADESH (2018-2019) By Rachna Bhatti Vidya Bhooshan Scientist ‘C’ Senior Technical Assistant (Hydrogeology) NORTHERN HIMALAYAN REGION DHARAMSHALA (H.P) January, 2021 GROUND WATER YEAR BOOK HIMACHAL PRADESH 2018-2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Central Ground Water Board, NHR has set up a network of 128 National Hydrograph Stations in the state of Himachal Pradesh. The monitoring commenced in the year 1969 with the establishment of 3 observation wells and since, then the number of monitoring station are being increased regularly so as to get the overall picture of ground water scenario in different hydrogeological set up of the state. Most of the area in Himachal Pradesh is hilly enclosing few small intermontane valleys. The traditional ground water structures under observation at present are dugwells and are mostly located in the valley areas only. Therefore, the ground water regime monitoring programme is concentrated mainly in valley areas of the state and some places in hard rock areas. All the 128 National Hydrograph Stations are located only in 7 districts out of the 12 districts in Himachal Pradesh. The reason being hilly terrain, hard approachability and insignificant number of structures available for monitoring. The average annual rainfall in the state varies from 600 mm to more than 2400 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Item No. 01 Court No. 1 BEFORE the NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
    Item No. 01 Court No. 1 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Appeal No. 57/2016 (M.A. No. 1236/2016 & M.A. No. 1237/2016) Rana Randeep Singh Appellant(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s) Heard on : 23.09.2019 Uploaded on: 01.10.2019 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P WANGDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER For Appellant(s): Mr. Rahul Choudhary and Ms. Meera Gopal, Advocates. For Respondent(s): Mr. Divya Prakash Pande, Advocate for HPSPCB. Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Advocate for MoEF&CC. Mr. Sarthak Ghonkrokta, Advocate for HPEIAA. Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. ORDER Per Justice S.P. Wangdi, Judicial Member 1. In this Appeal the Appellant assails Environmental Clearance (EC) dated 19.07.2016 granted in favour of the Respondent No. 6 by the State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Himachal Pradesh for mining of sand, stone 1 and bajri in river Yamuna. It is alleged that the EC is bad for the following reasons: i) The Respondent No. 6 had furnished wrong information in Form 1 submitted by him on 29.03.2016 as required under Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006 and also had concealed vital information in part (III) relating to Environmental Sensitivity in Form 1 of EIA Notification, 2006. The Respondent project proponent failed to disclose existence of Simbalbara Wildlife Sanctuary & National Park (also known as Sher Jung National Park), Notified Kalesar National Park Park (Haryana), Notified Asan Bird Conservation Reserve (Uttrakhand) and Rajaji National Park.
    [Show full text]