Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association
Request for Proposals
LOS ANGELES ZOO FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND RETAIL SERVICE OPERATIONS
5333 Zoo Drive Los Angeles, CA 90027
Release Date: December 5, 2018 Bidders Conference: December 12, 2018 Due Date: February 8, 2019
Submit all required contracting forms and BIP forms Through WWW.LABAVN.ORG
RFP Submission Deadline: 8th day, February, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. (PST)
Business Inclusion Program (BIP) Outreach Deadline: 25th day, January, 2019 at 11:59 p.m. (PST) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) LOS ANGELES ZOO FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND RETAIL SERVICE OPERATIONS ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
RFP ISSUE DATE: Week of December 3, 2018
Title: Los Angeles Zoo Food and Beverage and Retail Service Operations
Description: The Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association (GLAZA) and the City of Los Angeles is seeking a qualified entity to operate and maintain the Food and Beverage Concession and/or the Retail, Tram, Photo Booth, and the Stroller/Wheelchair Rental operations at the Los Angeles Zoo.
Website Address: http://www.labavn.org
Proposers must register on the Los Angeles Business Assistance Virtual Network (LABAVN) before they can access RFP materials and updates and required forms
Term: Ten (10) years with an option for an additional five (5) year period
KEY DATES:
Business Inclusion Program: January 25, 2019
Proposal Due Date: February 8, 2019
Proposal Delivery Address: Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association Attn: Hugh Miller, Chief Financial Officer 5333 Zoo Drive Los Angeles, CA 90027
Mandatory Bidders Conference And Site Walk Date and Location Los Angeles Zoo Witherbee Auditorium 5333 Zoo Drive Los Angeles, CA 90027 RSVP to: [email protected]
PROPOSALS WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTED FROM PROPOSERS WHO ATTEND THE BIDDERS CONFERENCE AND SITE WALK
RFP Coordinator: Hugh Miller [email protected]
______Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS LOS ANGELES ZOO FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND RETAIL SERVICE OPERATIONS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
I. Introduction ...... 1
II. Zoo Vision Plan—Important Notice ...... 2
III. Request for Proposals (“RFP”) Process ...... 2
IV. Description of the Los Angeles Zoo and the Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association ...... 3
V. Objectives of the Request for Proposals ...... 5
VI. RFP Timeline ...... 6
VII. Proposal Requirements ...... 7 A. Cover Letter B. Company Background and Experience C. Financial Capacity D. Business Plan E. Operational Plan F. Capital Investment and Revenue-Sharing (Commission) Proposal G. Additional Information H. Required Documents
VIII. Bidders Conference and Site Walk ...... 20
IX. Instructions to Proposers ...... 21 A. General Guidelines for Written Proposal B. Proposal Deposit C. Document Check D. Deadline and Delivery Instructions E. Verification of Information F. Cost of Preparation G. Confidentiality
X. Evaluation, Selection, and Award ...... 26 A. Evaluation Criteria B. Recommendation C. Award
XI. Protest Procedures ...... 28 ______Page ii
XI I. Standard Provisions for City Contracts (Rev. 10/17 v.3) ...... 29
XIII. Exhibits ...... 29
A. Premises Map and Square Footage B. (B1 – B8) Los Angeles Zoo Venue Data C. Historical Revenue by Category D. Historical Revenue by Location E. Attendance History F. F1 – F9 Food Location Menu and Prices/Special Event Descriptions G. Current Commission Structure H. Sponsorships I. Pro Forma Financials Form J. City Standard Provisions 10/17 v.3 K. Los Angeles Zoo Vision Plan
XIV. Required Documents ...... 30
A. (J1 - J2) Insurance Requirements City and GLAZA B. Pro Forma Financials Form C. City Good Food Purchasing Policy D. City Contract History Form E. City Residence Info Form F. City Ethics Form 50 G. City Ethics Form 55 H. Affidavit of Non Collusion I. Business Inclusion Program J. Non Discrimination, Equal Employment, and Affirmative Action K. Americans with Disabilities Act L. Child Support Ordinance M. Contractor Responsibility Ordinance N. Equal Benefits Ordinance and First Source Hiring Ordinance O. Living Wage Ordinance and Worker Retention Ordinance P. Slavery Disclosure/Border Wall Ordinance Q. Local Business Certification Affidavit of Eligibility R. Business Tax Registration S. Iran Contracting Act of 2010 Compliance Affidavit T. Internal Revenue Service W-9 Form U. Proposer’s Signature Declaration and Affidavit V. Draft Concession Services Agreement W. Disposition of Proposals
XV. Required City Documents Checklist and Proposer’s Checklist ...... 252
______Page iii LOS ANGELES ZOO FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND RETAIL SERVICE OPERATIONS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Los Angeles (hereinafter “City”) and the Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association (hereinafter “GLAZA”) are pleased to offer an exciting opportunity for a well-qualified business entity to operate and maintain the Food and Beverage Concession and/or the Retail, Tram, Photo Booth and Stroller/Wheelchair Rental operations at the Los Angeles Zoo (“Concession”).
This Request for Proposals (hereinafter “RFP”) is for the provision of special services which is an exception to the sealed bidding requirement of the City Charter Section 371 as GLAZA and the City finds that the use of sealed bids would be impractical and undesirable due to the nature of the requested services.
The proposing company (“Proposer”) shall demonstrate specific background and professional experience in a high quality food facility and/or retail concession as well as the ability to perform through a clearly articulated and achievable plan for innovative and profitable operations.
The selected Proposer shall demonstrate the ability to implement a program that will meet or exceed the RFP’s objectives as well as incorporate creative ideas that are appropriate to maximize revenue and improve the guest experience. The opportunity includes, but is not limited to, the following activities:
Food Service Proposal • Management and operation of visitor and event food/beverage service • Daily employee meals and in-house meetings and conferences • Preferred on-site catering
Retail Operations Proposal • Retail stores and merchandise kiosks • Tram service • Stroller/wheelchair rentals • Photo booth • Vending • Other operations as proposed
The RFP requires that only one single entity submit a Proposal and not Proposals that include a joint venture between multiple entities. This does not preclude the use of partnerships, subcontractors or Proposals for specific operation centers (food/beverage ______Page 1
vs. retail). A Food Service Proposal may include a bid on the Retail Operations, either as self-operated or with subcontractors. A Retail Proposal shall also include a bid on all items in the Retail category, either self-operated or with subcontractors.
Proposers may submit a bid for the entirety of the categories listed above, or in part, of the above opportunity as their experience allows. List any area in which the use of a subcontractor is planned. Complete and submit all sub-sections in Section VII.B for each proposed subcontractor.
Proposers must register on the Los Angeles Business Assistance Virtual Network (LABAVN) before they can access the RFP materials and updates. The LABAVN website is http://www.labavn.org Additionally Proposers should carefully review the required documents and the submission deadlines. All required documents must be uploaded to LABAVN.
II. ZOO VISION PLAN—IMPORTANT NOTICE
The Los Angeles Zoo (“Zoo”) is owned and operated by the City. The Zoo has recently completed a master planning process, which may result in significant improvements and expansion of certain concessions, infrastructure, and animal-related facilities (“Vision Plan”). A copy of the Vision Plan is incorporated into this RFP as Exhibit K.
Implementation of the Zoo’s Vision Plan may provide significant additional opportunities for increased revenue from the Food & Beverage and Retail Operations. As such, we have included in the Proposal format sections where respondents may provide for commission and capital overrides should additional volume occur based on the Vision Plan.
In the event that activities, construction, attendance, and days/hours available are impacted (e.g. by construction or demolition), there will be no compensation or modification to amounts due or other alterations of the terms of the agreement with the selected Proposer.
III. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (“RFP”) PROCESS
In accordance with Los Angeles City Council instructions adopted on August 10, 2016 (C.F. 14-0600-S223), this RFP must comply with the City’s contracting procedures as identified in Article III of the City Charter and Division 10 of the Administrative Code as follows:
City contracting procedures as identified in the Los Angeles Charter, Administrative Code (LAAC) and Executive Directives include but are not limited to the following:
______Page 2
• Use of the Los Angeles Business Virtual Network (LABAVN) to advertise the Request for Proposals (RFP) and to reach out to and evaluate potential concessionaires (Executive Directive No. 14, Villaraigosa Series)
• Compliance with the City's Competitive Bidding Procedure, which includes but is not limited to, the following: The RFP shall include a statement of the criteria that will be used in evaluating Proposals. Only the evaluation criteria stated in the RFP will be considered in the evaluation of Proposals. Award shall be made to the Proposer whose Proposal is most advantageous to the City. The contract file shall state in writing the basis on which the award is made. (Charter Sec.371 and LAAC Sec.10.15)
• Adherence to contracting-related ordinances and directives and the Standard Provisions for City Contracts (Rev.10/17 v.3)
http://cao.lacity.org/risk/StandardProvisions.pdf
• Good Food Purchasing Guidelines (Executive Directive No. 24, Villaraigosa Series) (contained in the Required Documents section as Required Document C)
• Contract must be made in writing (Charter Sec. 370)
• Contract must be approved by City Attorney as to form (LAAC Sec.10.2)
• Contract must be approved by the Mayor (Executive Directive No. 3, Villaraigosa Series)
• Contract and Concession Services Agreement must be approved by the City Council.
IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE LOS ANGELES ZOO AND THE GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOO ASSOCIATION
The Los Angeles Zoo, located at 5333 Zoo Dr., Los Angeles CA 90027, is nestled in a picturesque tree-enclosed setting in Griffith Park. The City of Los Angeles owns and operates the Zoo, its land, facilities and the animals. Animal care, grounds maintenance, construction, education, public information and administrative staff are City employees.
In 1885, the first City-owned Zoo opened in East Los Angeles Park, and was subsequently replaced by the Griffith Park Zoo, which opened in 1912 with 15 animals. Voters passed an $8 million bond measure in 1958 to fund the development of the new Los Angeles Zoo and Botanical Gardens which opened at its current location on November 28, 1966. The Los Angeles Zoo is now home to more than 1,400 mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles representing more than 270 different species of which more than 58 are endangered. In addition, the Zoo’s botanical collection comprises several planted gardens and over 800 different plant species with over 7,000 individual plants. The Zoo receives ______Page 3
nearly 1.8 million visitors per year. The Los Angeles Zoo is accredited by the Association of Zoo and Aquariums.
The Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association was created in 1963. It is a private, nonprofit corporation created to support the Zoo. Today, GLAZA provides support through operating and managing the following programs and services: fundraising, membership, special events and travel, publications, volunteers, administering the contract for visitor services concessions, and marketing and public relations as well as the food and beverage concessions, retail, catering, tram, stroller, vending and photo booth concessions itself or by using subcontractors.
The Zoo and GLAZA sponsor a number of annual daytime and nighttime events including Brew at the Zoo, Zoo Lights, and Roaring Nights. A description of these events is contained in Exhibit F9.
The City, through the Zoo Department, may assume GLAZA’s contracts for concessions.
The Zoo and GLAZA are considering options for the provision of services relating to Food and Beverage Service, Catering, Employee Meals, Retail Shops/Kiosks, Tram Service, Stroller/Wheelchair Rental, Vending, Photo Booths and catering services related to site rentals (“Concession”).
The Zoo and GLAZA currently have in place two sponsorship agreements which expire on 2/28/2019 and 1/31/2024, respectively. The sponsors are ICEE the non-exclusive iced drink provider. Pepsi is the exclusive beverage provider and sponsor of the Zoo with Zoo facility-wide locations.
The Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to develop additional sponsorship opportunities in the food and beverage categories on a case-by-case basis including alcoholic and non- alcoholic beverages. The selected proposer will not be entitled to any sponsorship payments.
The selected proposer will be required to meet the terms and conditions of any existing sponsorship agreements with the Zoo and GLAZA. The selected proposer will be expected to work in good faith with the Zoo and GLAZA to accommodate the requirements of sponsorship agreements without compensation.
The Concession premises are located in the Los Angeles Zoo. The selected Proposer will have rights to use the current areas and/or future areas as agreed to by the Zoo.
Please review Exhibits B1 – B8 Los Angeles Zoo Venue Data for an overview of data related to the Los Angeles Zoo. Further general information may be obtained by visiting www.lazoo.org.
______Page 4
V. OBJECTIVES OF THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
The objective of this RFP is to award up to a fifteen (15) year Concession Services Agreement (ten [10] years with one five [5] year renewal option) at the sole discretion of GLAZA and the City (hereinafter “Agreement”) between GLAZA and the selected Proposer that will accomplish the following:
• Maximize visitor experience through high quality merchandise, food and beverage and uniquely featured items throughout the Zoo. Provide the highest quality food, beverage and retail service with an attractive ambiance. • Maximize revenue generation and resulting commissions to the Zoo in accordance with instruction in Council File 14-0600-S223. • Minimize wait times for food, beverage and merchandise purchases. • Provide high quality healthy food in keeping with the City’s Good Food Purchasing Policies. • Provide professional service at reasonable, market prices. • Assess, install, provide, and maintain all necessary equipment, furnishings and ongoing maintenance to create an attractive and inviting food service and merchandise experience. • Provide food and beverage items which incorporate the demographics and needs of the community and Zoo visitors. • Establish and increase a strong customer base at the concession and retail facilities through the use of marketing, advertising and technology tools. • Coordinate with the Zoo and GLAZA to develop food and beverage menu items and unique merchandise for the Los Angeles Zoo as well as for outside events i.e., corporate, community and other social events. • Minimize risk and liabilities of GLAZA and the City. • Implement, maintain and enforce all safety rules and regulations related to concession and retail operations. • Operate under all City, GLAZA and Los Angeles Zoo policies and procedures, as well as all State and Federal regulations. • Report to and take direction from the designated GLAZA and Zoo staff with regard to all aspects of operations, quality, pricing, menu selection, internal control and personnel at the Zoo facility. • Provide regular reporting and audited financials to the City through the Zoo and GLAZA in addition to any reporting requirements established by GLAZA.
______Page 5
VI. RFP TIMELINE
DATE MILESTONE
Week of 12/3/18 RFP RELEASED December 12, 2018 MANDATORY BIDDERS CONFERENCE AND SITE WALK December 21, 2018 at DEADLINE FOR 11:59 p.m. QUESTIONS
January 11, 2019 at DEADLINE FOR POSTING 11:59 p.m. OF QUESTIONS AND ADDENDUM FEBRUARY 8, 2019 PROPOSAL DUE DATE Week of 2/18/19 LEVEL I REVIEW Week of 3/4/19 INTERVIEWS/REFERENCE CHECK/TASTE SAMPLING
Week of 3/14/19 SELECTION AND PRESENTATION TO THE GLAZA CONCESSSIONS COMMITTEE AND BOARD Week of 3/25/19 SUBMISSION TO THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Week of 04/15/19 COUNCIL CONSIDERATION EXECUTION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
May 2019 CONTRACT START AND TRANSITION
______Page 6
VII. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
In the written Proposal, Proposers should include detailed responses to each of the Proposal items listed below (“Proposal Items”). The selected Proposer must be willing and able to commit to the Proposal Items and all provisions contained in the Draft Concession Services Agreement (“Agreement”). The Agreement is contained in the Required Documents Section as Required Document V. The contents of a Proposer’s response will be deemed as a binding commitment and will be included as an attachment to the final Agreement.
Proposers must respond to each of the following items in their written Proposal. Each response must be numbered to correspond with the listed items below.
Proposal Items
A. Cover Letter B. Company Background and Experience C. Financial Capacity D. Business Plan E. Operational Plan F. Capital Investment and Revenue-Sharing Proposal G. Additional Information H. Required Documents
A. Cover Letter
Proposers are to include a cover letter including, at a minimum, the following information:
• Proposing company’s legal name (to be used on all documentation associated with this RFP and the resultant Agreement); • Type of business entity (corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship); • Key individuals’ names, including title and position; • Name of main point of contact who will be the only recipient of all information related to this RFP and who can speak on behalf of Proposer; • Complete mailing addresses; • Telephone and fax numbers (including office and cell numbers as appropriate); • E-mail addresses, and any other information needed to contact Proposers; • A statement that the proposing entity confirms its acknowledgement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the RFP and the Concession Services Agreement, without exception.
______Page 7
B. Company Background and Experience
This section pertains to your business entity’s PAST experience and CURRENT Operations, not your PROPOSED operation for this Concession.
Describe your business entity’s background and experience in providing the proposed services, including, if applicable, food, beverage, retail, tram, stroller/wheelchair and/or photo booth services at large venues such as the Los Angeles Zoo. If this is a new company formed for the operation of this Concession, describe the background and qualifications of each of the principals.
In the case of a partnership submission, a single entity MUST be responsible for all obligations and decision making and the sole point of contact and, as such, be empowered to enter into an agreement on behalf of the entirety of the partnership.
Each Proposer and subcontractor must have a minimum of ten (10) years’ qualifying experience of providing food and beverage services at large venues.
B.1 Ownership Description Proposers must include a response to each Proposal item listed below: B.1.1 Business Address (include corporate and regional operations, if applicable) B.1.2 Length of time in business (in years and months) B.1.3 Entity type: Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Limited Liability Company (LLC), etc. B.1.4 Size of company (include total number of employees and annual gross revenue) B.1.5 Organizational chart (including parent company, if applicable) B.1.6 Names of persons responsible for operations (CEO, key operators, etc.) B.1.7 Any pending mergers (if none, so state) B.1.8 Ownership information for all proposed subcontractors
B.2 Description of Operational Experience Proposers must include a response to each Proposal Item listed below (if none, so state in the response to each item): B.2.1 Mission statement (one page or less) including how the company’s goals align with the Zoo experience B.2.2 Description of comparable current and past operations B.2.3 Revenues of comparable current or past operations under the Proposer’s management, broken down by category (food, non- alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, etc.), for the previous five (5) years (if applicable) B.2.4 Number of years of above experience B.2.5 Extent of any related experience B.2.6 Additional information that demonstrates Proposer’s qualifications
______Page 8
B.3 Contracts History Proposers must include a response to each Proposal Item listed below (if none, so state in the response to each item). Include contact information for each contract listed: B.3.1 List all contracts commenced or terminated (including with the City of Los Angeles), for whatever reasons, during the last ten (10) years, along with an explanation of the reasons for any termination B.3.2 List all zoo, aquarium or botanical garden venue contracts Proposer or subcontractor had within last ten (10) years, if any, including client contact information B.3.3 List all restaurants/cafe venue contracts Proposer or subcontractor had within last ten (10) years, including client contact information
B.4 Current Operations Proposers must include a response to each Proposal Item listed below (if none, so state in the response to each item below): B.4.1 Describe Proposer’s core business B.4.2 Additional services, products and works provided outside Proposer’s core business B.4.3 Current business within L.A. County (provide client contact information) B.4.4 Current business in California (if not listed above, provide client contact information) B.4.5 Employee hiring, training, motivation, and promotion policies B.4.6 Methods and controls for accounting B.4.7 Details of all certifications held (e.g. ISO 9001), including date of last certification/recertification and details of the certifying body (copies of certifications may be appended to Proposer’s response) B.4.8 Details of any recent corporate awards, including the awarding body, if relevant to the Proposal
B.5 References Proposers must include a response to each Proposal Item listed below: B.5.1 Business References: Provide a minimum of three (3) references with which you have conducted business. At least one (1) of such references must be a current relationship. Include names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses and the scope of the business relationship.
B.5.2 Financial References: Provide a minimum of three (3) references from banks or other financial institutions with which your company has a relationship. Include names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses and the type of relationship (e.g., checking/savings accounts, commercial loans, landlord, lessor). One of these should be a current client account with a minimum of $5 million in annual revenue.
______Page 9
C. Financial Capacity
Each Proposer must demonstrate the means and resources to finance, operate, and sustain the Concession as proposed, including start-up and pre- opening costs, inventory and sufficient working capital, and access to additional capital if needed. To this end, each Proposer must provide a detailed listing of available cash, credit, debt, and funding sources, both historical and projected, along with contact information. A Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) business credit report should be included. All items submitted are subject to verification.
C.1 Good Standing/Going Concern Audited financial statements including footnotes, should be submitted with no qualified opinion, including “Going Concern” issues. Issues identified as “Going Concern” issues are defined as those which would impact the ability of the business to continue operation for the foreseeable future.
C.2 Amount of Investment State the amount of investment you will need to begin operations as proposed. This amount must include start-up costs. Proposers must include a response to each Proposal Item listed below:
C.2.1 Performance deposit C.2.2 Equipment C.2.3 Operating supplies (small wares) C.2.4 Facility improvements C.2.5 Pre-opening marketing and promotion C.2.6 Other (list)
The amount stated here must be consistent with the Proposer’s Financial Projections and Planning, which is to be completed in response to Section C.4.4 of this RFP.
C.3 Source(s) of Funding Indicate whether the proposed source(s) of funding the amount listed in Section VII.C.2 is cash reserves, financing from a commercial lender, other sources, or a combination thereof. If a combination of sources, indicate the amount that is to be funded through each source.
C.4 Financial Documentation Each Proposer must provide the following written verification of its ability and commitment to provide adequate funding in the amount indicated above. Proposers must include a response to each Proposal Item listed below:
______Page 10
C.4.1 If cash reserves are to be used to fund the operation, provide the following (if no cash is to be used, state in your response to this section):
• If proposing entity is a public corporation, include a letter signed by an officer of the company who represents that company’s finance committee or other entity (executive committee, board of directors, etc.) that has the authority to approve the expenditures. Such letter must be an original and must be notarized. • If proposing entity is a private corporation, include a letter signed by an owner of the company that has the authority to approve the expenditures. Such letter must be an original and must be notarized. • Copies of current credit reports/ratings of the proposing entity. If private capital is to be used, provide copies of current credit reports/ratings of the person(s) whose funds are to be used. (“Current” in this context shall mean reports/ratings dated January 2018 or later.)
C.4.2 If loans are to be used to fund the operation, provide the following (if no loans are to be used, state in your response to this section):
• A copy of an unconditional, formal letter of commitment from the lender(s); • Copies of current credit reports/ratings of the proposing entity. (“Current” in this context shall mean reports/ratings dated January 2018 or later.)
C.4.3 Provide detailed documentation for any additional sources of funding. (If no sources of funding are to be used other than those already indicated, state in your response to this section).
C.4.4 Financial Projections and Planning
Proposers are to complete and submit a Pro Forma Financial Statement Submittal Form (Submittal Form) (see Exhibit I and Required Document B) and a schedule of proposed commission and minimum commission payments as well as commission overrides. All commission payments shall be based on Gross Revenue.
The Submittal Form covers anticipated operations over a fifteen (15) year term of the Agreement (ten [10] years with one five [5] year renewal option at the discretion of GLAZA and the City). Projections should demonstrate sound financial planning, be realistic and achievable, and support all elements of the Proposal.
______Page 11
In additional to the Submittal Form, each Proposer shall provide, in their own format, a fifteen (15) year sales and commission estimate.
The Submittal Form requires the Proposer to enter the following information:
• Pro Forma Profit and Loss: Projections for a fifteen-year term (reflecting an agreement of ten (10) years, with one five (5) year renewal option at the discretion of GLAZA and the City), including projected revenues for each category of sales; variable costs (e.g. cost of goods sold); fixed costs (e.g. salaries, advertising and marketing, revenue- sharing, depreciation, utilities, insurance, etc.); interest and taxes, debt rate, cash flow, and net profit. Proposers may enter additional information pertinent to their financial planning.
• Break-Even Analysis: The Proposer’s return on investment is reflected here. Proposers should provide narrative explanations of their projected financial planning, indicating any assumptions made: for example, inflation rates; anticipated increases in minimum wage and/or living wage or decreases in staffing levels; anticipated revenue and/or attendance increases. Indicate any research undertaken to support these assumptions.
C.5 Insurance and Indemnification
C.5.1 Without limiting the selected Proposer’s obligation to indemnify, hold harmless and defend GLAZA, the City and the Zoo, in addition to any requirements set by GLAZA (see Required Document A), the selected Proposer shall maintain at its own expense the minimum amounts of insurance coverage listed in the Required Documents Section of this RFP, which is incorporated herein by reference. The insurance coverage shall be effective for all injury or damage arising during the term of the Agreement, even if a claim is made after the termination of the Agreement. Also incorporated herein by reference are the insurance requirements of GLAZA as specified in the Required Documents. The selected Proposer’s policies for the required insurance coverages shall be primary and non-contributory to any similar insurance and/or self-insurance that GLAZA, the City or the Zoo maintain with NO right of subrogation.
The selected Proposer shall name GLAZA, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Los Angeles Department of the Zoo (and others) as additional named insureds on insurance policies. Certificates of insurance and duplicate original policies shall be sent to GLAZA and the City. These documents must be in a form acceptable to the Office of the City Administrative Officer, Risk Management. Please indicate
______Page 12
the types, carriers, and amounts of insurance you are able to provide for this purpose.
C.5.2 The selected Proposer shall provide full (not mutual) indemnification to GLAZA and the City entities. The required indemnification provision is included in the Draft Concession Services Agreement which will is incorporated into this RFP as Required Document V. Neither GLAZA nor the City of Los Angeles shall provide indemnification or certificates of insurance to the selected Proposer.
D. Business Plan
Proposer shall submit a business plan for Concession operations that will deliver high quality offerings and services to all visitors. Specific attention should be focused on plans for achieving the stated objectives within a similar volume facility and given anticipated seasonal fluctuations (e.g., address which concessions/points-of-sale will be open during each season based on attendance projections).
Each Proposal must include the names and a description of key personnel (including experience, licenses and certifications) who will be assigned to perform work on site under the Agreement. Note: The General Manager for the selected Proposer as well as other key personnel shall be identified by name and responsibilities and must have a minimum of ten (10) years’ experience in similar food and beverage management positions. At its sole expense, the selected Proposer shall be responsible for conducting regular background checks and regular health checks for communicable diseases, including tuberculosis testing, for all of the selected Proposer’s employees working on site. GLAZA or the Zoo, at their sole discretion, may reject or disallow the selected Proposer’s on-site employment of any individual. Changes to key personnel must be approved by the Zoo and GLAZA.
Proposers must provide all heavy and light duty equipment including, but not limited to, kitchen equipment, mobile food and beverage carts, point-of-sale systems, credit/debit card machines and new technology systems. All equipment and facilities must be maintained in good working condition throughout the term of the Agreement. A complete list of the major equipment with cost estimates must be included in the Proposal. Any existing equipment or facilities at the Los Angeles Zoo which have been left in place are AS-IS and without representation or warranty. All equipment and facilities are accepted by the selected Proposer in AS-IS condition.
All permits and licenses for operating the Concession, including but not limited to Health Permits and Alcoholic Beverage Control License, must be maintained throughout the term of the Agreement. The Alcoholic Beverage Control License must be transferrable at the end of the term of the Agreement at the lesser of current value or price paid by the selected Proposer.
______Page 13
IMPORTANT: All taxes (federal, state, county, city and local) arising from or by virtue of the Agreement, including possessory interest tax, will be the responsibility of the selected Proposer, including any taxes and assessments against GLAZA or the Zoo for taxable possessory interests incurred during the term of the Agreement and any such taxes or assessments shall not be deductible or offset against revenue, commissions or capital investment.
D.1 Additional Services and/or Amenities Proposers are encouraged to consider and propose additional food, beverage, retail and merchandising ideas; tram, stroller/wheelchair rental and/or photo booth concepts and locations; as well as other business activities and/or amenities (including additional points of sale) at the facility, provided they are appropriate for the Concession, compatible with other Zoo activities, and approved by the Zoo and GLAZA.
D.2 Catering The selected Proposer shall have “Preferred Caterer” status as defined in the Draft Concession Services Agreement. The Zoo and GLAZA will refer all catering inquiries to the selected Proposer, who must provide high quality menu choices and reasonable market pricing in keeping with the City’s Good Food Purchasing Policies. If the selected Proposer is not able to satisfy the customer's menu, price/budget, service, experience or other criteria, GLAZA may authorize the customer to bring in their own caterer. Any outside caterer used for a non-GLAZA sponsored event will be required to pay at least the same commission as the selected Proposer and any such commissions will not be shared with the selected Proposer.
If the Zoo and GLAZA determine that the quality of food is not up to its catering standards, GLAZA or the Zoo may request the chef be transferred.
For GLAZA-sponsored events, GLAZA retains the right to award catering services to another provider for up to four (4) events annually.
Describe catering experience and provide evidence to support ability to handle large groups (up to 5,000 people). Proposal should include catering concepts, sample menus, pricing, equipment utilization, and staffing plans for events of varying sizes.
E. Operational Plan
Proposers should include in their Proposal décor concepts with illustrations and full financial cost breakdown for each operating location, e.g., cafés, concession stands, mobile food and beverage carts, retail, tram, stroller/wheelchair rental, and/or photo booth. Décor concepts must enhance the venue’s ambience and create an attractive environment for all visitors. Food and beverage concepts should include, but not be limited to: street food, grab and go, branded cuisine, coffee concepts, craft beers, wine
______Page 14
and non-alcoholic beverages that reflect the cultural diversity of Los Angeles and that will comply with the Los Angeles Food Policy Council’s Good Food Purchasing Program Guidelines, attached hereto as Required Document C.
E.1 Storage, Office, and Kitchen Space
The Zoo has limited space for kitchens, office and storage. The Proposer shall state whether it has other off-site storage, kitchen or office space accessible for use during the term of the Agreement. Indicate the square footage needed for office space and other back-of-house activities (e.g. storage and other non- revenue generating areas).
E.2 Quality Control, Health and Safety, and Operations Audits
E.2.1 The selected Proposer shall engage and pay for a monthly “secret shopper” service to visit the Zoo and prepare a report to the Zoo and GLAZA on behalf of the City on quality of Concession operations and services performance. The selected Proposer shall also make customer survey cards available to Zoo visitors, both on-site and online.
E.2.2 The selected Proposer, through a third party, shall pay for and provide monthly health and safety inspections.
E.2.3 The selected Proposer will track quality control monthly in all areas, and provide compliance documents monthly, including the Good Food Purchasing Program Guidelines, and ensure any and all deficiencies are corrected in a timely manner.
E.2.4 The selected Proposer shall be subject to periodic (monthly) operating audits of the food service facilities by the Zoo and GLAZA. Such audits may include, but not be limited to, a comprehensive review of: (a) Service quality, attentiveness, courteousness; (b) Food quality, presentation, and merchandising; (c) Sanitation practices and conditions; (d) Personnel appearance; (e) Training program techniques, schedules, and records; (f) Safety conditions; (g) Operational performance from a financial perspective; and (h) Other related operational conditions and/or practices.
The selected Proposer will reimburse the Zoo and GLAZA for reasonable and actual out-of-pocket expenses for all audits required throughout the term of the Concession Services Agreement, including financial and operational. The need for operations audits and their timing to be solely determined by the Zoo and GLAZA and will be reasonable in scope and frequency consistent with common audit practice.
______Page 15
E.3 Pricing of Concessions
The selected Proposer shall establish and control the reasonable pricing of all items available for sale at the Zoo, subject to the review and written approval of the Zoo and GLAZA. Proposers shall include in their Proposal the following discounts, at a minimum, and may offer additional discounts as part of their Proposal:
E.3.1 A thirty-five percent (35%) discount off regular pricing for all concessions paid for by GLAZA or the Zoo at GLAZA- or Zoo-sponsored events, including office meetings, Board of Trustees meetings and similar functions.
E.3.2 A fifty percent (50%) discount off regular pricing for all food, beverage and retail items purchased by Zoo and GLAZA employees, docents and volunteers and their guests. The proposer may offer a similar benefit to its on-site employees.
E.3.3 A fifty percent (50%) discount off the average price charged to the public for breakfast items for Zoo and GLAZA employees, docents and volunteers Monday through Friday. The selected Proposer shall also offer a planned daily lunch special for Zoo and GLAZA employees, docents and volunteers at a fifty percent (50%) discount off the average price charged to the public for such a meal. The proposer may offer a similar benefit to its on-site employees.
*These discounts will not be included in gross receipts.
E.4 Preventive Maintenance, Repairs and Equipment Replacement
Proposer shall include in their Proposal a maintenance plan that allocates no less than 1.5 percent of gross revenues on a monthly basis to address preventive maintenance and allocates no less than 1.0 percent for small wares replacement. The selected Proposer shall verify to the Zoo and GLAZA that these funds are available for this purpose pursuant to procedures to be established in the Concession Service Agreement. The selected Proposer shall also develop an annual preventive maintenance and small wares purchase plan in conjunction with the Zoo and GLAZA.
F. Capital Investment and Revenue-Sharing (Commission) Proposal
Proposer must demonstrate that the proposed revenue-sharing payment is competitive, sustainable, and realistic. Proposed Percentage Commission Form and Pro Forma Financial Statement Form (Exhibit I and Required Document B) must be completed and inserted in this section. Revenue-sharing terms must also be indicated in the Pro Forma Financial Statement submittal form.
______Page 16
F.1 Capital Investment
Capital Improvements are an important aspect of achieving the objective of this RFP. This investment, coupled with an ongoing schedule tied to an effective preventive maintenance plan, will ensure that Zoo Concessions capital facilities and equipment are up to date and properly maintained.
Proposers must submit the following:
1. A fifteen-year Capital Investment plan (reflecting an agreement of ten (10) years, with one five (5) year renewal option at the discretion of GLAZA and the City). The proposed Capital Investment plan must be designed to be implemented in five- year increments. The details of the final Capital Investment plan reflecting the Zoo Vision Plan and any necessary amortization schedules will be negotiated with the selected Proposer and approved by both the Zoo and GLAZA.
Note: Amortization of Capital Investments shall start at the beginning of each period, regardless of when spent, such that there are no unamortized amounts at the end of each five (5) year period.
2. A sustainability plan which complies with the Los Angeles Green Building Code. Details can be found at https://ladbs.org/services/green-building-sustainability.
3. Renderings of proposed improvements at one or more the Zoo’s concessions, along with details on a guaranteed investment amount and schedule of investments and improvements.
All improvements must be completed in a manner that will minimize disruption to Zoo visitors and Zoo operations. Very clear planning of improvements must be made well in advance of any capital construction. All proposed improvements shall be approved by the Zoo and GLAZA prior to the required permitting process, including but not limited to Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS), LAFD, Department on Disability, Department of City Planning, and the Cultural Heritage Commission.
4. Any additional information that the Proposers find relevant.
F.2 Revenue-Sharing (Commission) Proposal
Each Proposal shall include a proposed percentage to be paid monthly on merchandise, food, non-alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, catering sales and all other revenue-generating activities. Proposal should include a percentage (X %) based on annual gross receipts (without deduction). Each Proposal must specify a proposed percentage for each location or service for year’s one (1) to five (5), additional increased percentage for years six (6) to ten (10), and additional increased percentage for years eleven (11) to fifteen (15).
______Page 17
F.3 Minimum Annual Guarantee
Each Proposal must include a proposed Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) for all concession and/or retail sales of a fixed amount which is equal to or exceeds $1,700,000 dollars annually for years one (1) to five (5), years six (6) to ten (10), and years eleven (11) to fifteen (15). The MAG is a minimum annual payment in the event the revenue-sharing commission does not generate this amount.
If by June 30th of each fiscal year, the total monthly commission payments are not equal to or do not exceed the MAG, the difference between the actual payment received and the MAG will be payable by July 15th for the preceding year, pro- rated as necessary for the first year of the Term and the final year of the Term.
Proposers may submit their own fixed offer for the Minimum Annual Guarantee. However, the amount shall not be less than $1,700,000 annually for a combined total from Food/Beverage/Retail for the first five-year period and a larger fixed Minimum Annual Guarantee for the following one or two five-year periods.
F.4 Additional Attendance-Based Commission
In addition to the Minimum Annual Guarantee, in order to ensure that the Zoo receives the full value of any attendance and Concessions sales increases during the term of the Agreement, each Proposal shall include three revised and enhanced Revenue-Sharing (Commission) Proposals (“Attendance-Based Commission”) containing a larger percent commission to GLAZA than what is being proposed in F.2 above, reflecting a percentage of all concession, food and beverage and/or retail gross receipts if annual Zoo attendance (daytime and nighttime) exceeds 1.9 million visitors annually, 2.0 million visitors annually, and if annual Zoo attendance (daytime and nighttime) exceeds 2.1 million annually. Please note that Zoo attendance was 1,743,795 visitors in 2016-17, and 1,802,387 visitors in 2017-18.
G. Additional Information
The information in this section will provide the Proposal Review Committee further insight into the Proposer’s business practices and response to specific situations.
G.1 Relationship In one page, explain how Proposer will interact and build a relationship with Zoo members and visitors.
G.2 Quality, Creativity and Innovation What do quality, creativity and innovation mean for Proposer’s guests? In one page explain how quality, creativity and innovation impact the concession and/or retail
______Page 18
guest experience at one of your large facilities (annual attendance of 1 million visitors or more).
G.3 Customer Service and Satisfaction Give a one-page example of how Proposer went out of its way to seek out and resolve guests’ issues in one of Proposer’s large venues (annual attendance of 1 million visitors or more).
G.4 Entrepreneurship In one of Proposer’s large venues (attendance of 1 million visitors or more), explain in one page how Proposer operates in entrepreneurial ways.
G.5 Venue Approach Provide a one paragraph summary of proposed changes for each of the following locations. Approximate square footage is listed for each facility. Additional information is contained in Exhibits A and B of this document.
G.5.1 Zoo Grill – 2356 G.5.2 Zoo Grill Kiosk – 122 G.5.3 Reggie’s Bistro – 1246 G.5.4 Mahale Café – 1124 G.5.5 Mahale Kiosk – 120 G.5.6 Churro Factory – 439 G.5.7 Gorilla Grill – 439 G.5.8 Café Pico – 439 G.5.9 La Casita – 120 G.5.10 International Marketplace --3500 G.5.11 other food or merchandise kiosks G.5.12 Tram, stroller rental, photo booth --600
G.6 - Explain how Proposal will address the items listed in Section V “Objectives of the Request for Proposals.”
H. Required Documents
As part of the RFP process, all Proposers are to review, complete, and submit all required documents discussed in this RFP and summarized in Section XV., “Documents Required by the City of Los Angeles.” Previous required document submittals and/or waivers do not apply. New forms must be completed and submitted. All required documents and forms must be uploaded to LABAVN.
______Page 19
Additional information regarding some required documents may be available at the Bidders conference, and/or by email to the GLAZA RFP Coordinator. GLAZA and Zoo reserve the right to request additional information and/or clarification regarding submitted documents during the evaluation process. Proposers must also provide the following:
H.1 Proposer’s Signature Declaration and Affidavit. This document must be signed by an authorized officer of the company. Legal name(s) must be consistent on all Proposal documents and the final Concession Services Agreement. (Required Document U) H.2 Disposition of Proposals. This document must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the Proposer. (Required Document W) H.3 Proposer must submit a signed document agreeing to follow all city, county, state and federal laws, ordinances, bylaws, etc., as applicable. H.4 Form W-9 (Request for Federal Taxpayer ID Number). The name on this document must match the Proposer’s legal business name, as listed on the Proposer’s Signature Declaration and Affidavit. H.5 Valid L.A. City Business Tax Registration Certificate (Required Document R)
VIII. BIDDERS CONFERENCE AND SITE WALK
GLAZA will hold a mandatory Bidders conference (“Conference”) to further familiarize Proposers with the Zoo and the opportunity for doing business. The purpose of the Conference is to clarify the contents of this RFP and to discuss the needs of the Concession. A mandatory site walk (“Site Walk”) of the facility will take place after the conclusion of the Conference. A maximum of five (5) representatives from each Proposer are permitted to attend the Conference and site walk.
Please contact the GLAZA RFP Coordinator with any questions.
Date: December 12, 2018 Time: 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 p.m. Location: Los Angeles Zoo
Site Walk: Date: December 12, 2018 Time: 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 pm Location: Los Angeles Zoo
Additional site walks may be necessary and will be available to Proposers upon request. It is highly recommended that prospective Proposers read the complete RFP prior to the Conference and begin preparation of their Proposal in order to maximize the benefits of the Conference. Proposals will only be accepted from Proposers who attend the Bidders Conference and Site Walk. ______Page 20
IX. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
A. General Guidelines for Written Proposal
To be considered for award of this Agreement, Proposers must submit a sealed, written Proposal in response to the Proposal Items indicated herein.
Proposers may wish to consider the following guidelines in preparing their Proposals:
• Ensure that the Proposal is easy to read and well-organized in its response to objectives.
• Verify that the Proposal is complete and that it has thoroughly responded to all Proposal items and Required Documents in the RFP.
• Formulate the responses precisely and with detail; avoid vague, meaningless, or open-ended responses. Explain how the responses further the stated objectives.
• Ensure that the Proposal demonstrates that the financial projections and cost estimates are realistic and sustainable.
• Clearly describe what the management team will bring to the Los Angeles Zoo.
• If there are significant risks in the business strategy, include plans to mitigate those risks, addressing any contingencies that may arise.
The written submittal will be the primary basis on which the Proposal Review Committee will consider its recommendation; therefore, Proposers should be as thorough and as detailed as possible when responding to each Proposal item and assembling required documentation. Proposals may not be amended or modified after the due date.
A Proposer may be deemed to be non-responsive if the Proposer fails to provide all required documentation and any supplemental information or clarification requested by the GLAZA RFP Coordinator.
Written Proposals constitute a legally binding contract offer. It is requested that Proposals be prepared simply and economically, avoiding the use of unnecessary promotional material.
B. Proposal Deposit
All Proposals must include a twenty-thousand dollar ($20,000.00) Proposal deposit in the form of a cashier’s check only, payable to the Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association (“Proposal Deposit”). This amount shall be payable as a guarantee that the selected ______Page 21
Proposer will enter into the Agreement for the Concession. The selected Proposer shall have fifteen (15) calendar days from the date the contract is awarded to review, sign, and return the Agreement to GLAZA. In the event the selected Proposer fails to return the signed Agreement and all other required documents within the allotted time frame, a penalty of two hundred dollars ($200.00) per calendar day shall be deducted from the Proposal Deposit. If, after thirty (30) calendar days from the date the contract is awarded, the Agreement is not signed in final form and returned, GLAZA retains the right to move on to the Proposer with the next highest evaluation ranking.
Proposal Deposits are maintained for all Proposers in the event the selected Proposer fails to execute the Agreement and another Proposer is considered for award of the contract.
The Proposal Deposit of the selected Proposer will be released upon receipt of the required performance deposit, certificate of insurance, and execution of the Agreement. In the event that an award is made and the selected Proposer fails to execute the Agreement and to provide the required performance deposit and insurance policies within ninety (90) days, the Proposal Deposit will be forfeited and retained by GLAZA.
The Proposal Deposits of non-selected Proposers will be returned upon final execution of the Agreement with the selected Proposer.
C. Document Check
Please check the LABAVN website carefully to ensure that it includes all the necessary documents as referenced within the RFP, including any addenda. If any Proposal Items are missing, make a written request via email to the GLAZA RFP Coordinator at [email protected] to upload the missing documents.
Should a discrepancy in or omissions from said documents be identified, or if there are questions as to their meaning, notify the GLAZA RFP Coordinator at the above address in writing no later than the deadline date for receiving Proposals. Neither the City nor GLAZA will be bound by any oral statements or representations.
D. Deadline and Delivery Instructions
Deadline for Submission
To be considered, Proposals must be physically received and uploaded to LABAVN at or before 3:00 pm on February 8, 2019. LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE OPENED AND WILL BE REJECTED.
______Page 22
Delivery Address
The complete Proposal package shall be placed in a sealed envelope(s) or box (es) labeled “Proposal for the “Los Angeles Zoo Food and Beverage and Retail Concession”, or “Proposal for the Los Angeles Zoo Food and Beverage Concession” or “Proposal for the Los Angeles Zoo Retail Concession.”
Said envelope or box shall have the name and address of the Proposer on the outside and be delivered to GLAZA as follows:
The original, requested hard copies and electronic copy sent to: Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association Attn: Hugh Miller Chief Financial Officer 5333 Zoo Dr. Los Angeles, CA 90027
All late Proposals will not be opened and will be rejected.
Number of Copies
Please provide one (1) original, five (5) hard copies, and one (1) electronic copy on a flash drive. Plainly identify the respective documents. An original is one in which a form requiring a signature must be signed in wet ink. A reproducible copy is one that can readily be reproduced through a photocopier. If the Proposal contains confidential information, one (1) additional pre-redacted, non-bound, reproducible copy must be provided. Please refer to Section IX.G. “Confidentiality” for additional information concerning the treatment of confidential information.
ADDITIONALLY, COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED TO LABAVN BY THE PROPOSAL DEADLINE.
Important Notices
Proposers who mail their Proposals should allow adequate time for mail processing and delivery. Late Proposals will not be considered for review. The Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to determine the timeliness of the Proposals received. At the day and time appointed, all timely submitted Proposals will be opened, and the name of the Proposer(s) announced. No other information about the Proposals will be made public until such time as the Proposal Review Committee makes an award recommendation.
______Page 23
The Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to extend the submission deadline should such action be in the best interest of the Zoo and GLAZA. In the event that deadline is extended, Proposers will have the right to revise submitted Proposals. Proposals may be withdrawn personally, by written request, prior to the scheduled closing time for receipt of Proposals. After withdrawing a previously submitted Proposal, the Proposer may submit another Proposal at any time up to the specified deadline.
A withdrawn Proposal will be returned only if the above-described written withdrawal request explicitly requests its return. In such case it will be delivered either by USPS mail or in person to a representative of the Proposer who presents the withdrawal request with original signature. A delivery service other than USPS mail may be used only if the Proposer pays for that service.
Submission of a Proposal pursuant to this RFP shall constitute acknowledgement and acceptance of the terms and conditions set forth herein. All portions of the RFP and the contents of the Proposal submitted by the selected Proposer shall become contractual obligations if the Agreement is awarded. Failure of the selected Proposer to accept these obligations may result in cancellation of the award and forfeiture of the Proposal Deposit.
E. Verification of Information
The Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to verify the information received in a Proposal. If a Proposer knowingly and willfully submits false information or data, GLAZA and the City reserve the right to reject the Proposal. If it is determined that the Agreement was awarded as a result of false statements or other data submitted in response to this RFP, GLAZA and the City reserve the right to terminate the Agreement.
F. Cost of Preparation
All costs of Proposal preparation shall be borne by the Proposer. Neither GLAZA nor the City shall, in any event, be liable for any expenses incurred by the Proposer in the preparation and/or submission of the Proposal. All Proposers who respond to solicitations do so solely at their own expense.
G. Confidentiality
All Proposals submitted in response to this RFP become the property of GLAZA and the City and will be considered public documents. Proposers must identify all copyrighted material, trade secrets, or other proprietary information that they claim are exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act (California Code Sections 6259 et seq.). In the event such an exemption is claimed, the Proposer shall state in the Proposal that they will defend any action brought against GLAZA and/or the City for a refusal to disclose such material trade secrets, or other proprietary information to any party making a request therefore. Failure to include such a statement shall constitute a waiver of a Proposer’s right to exemption from disclosure. Neither the City nor GLAZA assume responsibility for disclosure or use of unmarked data for any purposes. Note that wholesale use of
______Page 24
headers/footers bearing designations such as “confidential”, “proprietary”, or “trade secret” on all or nearly all of a Proposal is not acceptable, and may be deemed by the Zoo and GLAZA as a waiver of any exemption claim. The identification of exempt information must be more specific.
CONTACT WITH GLAZA OR ZOO PERSONNEL:
Please direct all comments and questions to the GLAZA RFP Coordinator. All contact regarding this RFP or any matter relating thereto must be in writing and may be mailed or e-mailed as follows:
Name: GLAZA RFP Coordinator Address: 5333 Zoo Dr. Los Angeles, CA 90027 E-mail: [email protected]
ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE ABOVE EMAIL ADDRESS.
To maximize the effectiveness of the Bidders Conference, the GLAZA RFP Coordinator requests that Proposers provide questions in writing prior to the Conference. This will enable the GLAZA RFP Coordinator to prepare responses in advance. Additional questions may be accepted, in writing, at the Conference. However, responses may be deferred and provided as addenda to the RFP at a later date.
When submitting questions, please specify the RFP section number, paragraph number, page number, and quote the passage that prompted the question. This will ensure that the passage can be quickly found in the RFP.
All questions, without identifying the submitting company, will be compiled with the appropriate answers and issued as an addendum to the RFP. GLAZA reserves the right to group similar questions when providing answers. Answers to the questions will also be posted on LABAVN and the GLAZA website.
If a GLAZA requirement or the specifications prevent Proposers from submitting a Proposal that would be beneficial to the Zoo, please address the concern to the GLAZA RFP Coordinator in writing no later than December 17, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. in order to allow sufficient time for a written response.
Questions may address concerns that the application of minimum requirements, evaluation criteria and/or business requirements would unfairly disadvantage Proposers or, due to unclear instructions, may result in GLAZA not receiving the best possible responses from Proposers.
______Page 25
NOTE: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT QUESTIONS BE SUBMITTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 17, 2018 AT 5:00 P.M., IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE GLAZA RFP COORDINATOR SUFFICIENT TIME TO POST WRITTEN RESPONSES PRIOR TO THE PROPOSAL DEADLINE. ALL RESPONSES WILL BE POSTED ON THE LABAVN WEBSITE, IN ADDITION TO BEING POSTED ON THE GLAZA WEBSITE.
X. EVALUATION, SELECTION, AND AWARD
A preliminary evaluation of all Proposals submitted by the deadline will be conducted to determine compliance with City Proposal requirements as detailed in Section III. “Request for Proposals (“RFP”) Process” of this RFP and required document submissions. Additional information to clarify the content of a submitted Proposal may be requested.
All Proposals shall be reviewed to determine that the minimum eligibility requirements have been met. All non-responsive Proposers will be informed in writing that their Proposal does not meet the minimum eligibility requirements.
Failure of a Proposer to specifically respond to each RFP item, or any other information required in accordance with the City contracting provisions, may be grounds for rejecting that Proposer’s Proposal.
Any and all Proposals submitted in response to this RFP may be rejected, and any informality in a Proposal may be waived by the Zoo and GLAZA, when to do so would be to the benefit of the City and GLAZA.
A Proposal Review Committee will review all responsive Proposals for their ability to achieve the outcomes described in Section V, “Objectives of the Request for Proposals” of this RFP in accordance with the evaluation criteria and response format described below.
A. Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation process will consist of two levels.
Each Proposer must pass the Level I Evaluation in order to advance to Level II Evaluation.
Throughout the evaluation process, the Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to request additional information to clarify a submitted Proposal.
A.1. Level I – Compliance
The GLAZA RFP Coordinator will conduct a preliminary evaluation of all Proposals submitted by the RFP deadline to determine compliance with Proposal
______Page 26
requirements and mandatory document submissions. The preliminary evaluation will focus on the following items: • Cover Letter • Proposal Deposit - $20,000 • Required Documents • Background and Experience • Financial Capacity • Statement of acceptance of the terms and form of the Concession Services Agreement
A.2. Level II – Interviews and Presentations
Tentative Interview and Presentation Dates: Week of March 4, 2018
Interviews by the Proposal Review Committee and presentations by Proposers will be scheduled individually after Level I compliance documents are completed and reviewed.
PROPOSAL SCORING CRITERIA
Proposers will be scored and ranked based on the following criteria on a 100-point scale:
Category Maximum Points Business Plan 10 points Investment and Facility Improvement 30 points Proposed Revenue Sharing Payment 35 points Proposer’s History (including but not limited 25 points to financial capacity, experience with zoos or similar venues, background, references, management) TOTAL 100 POINTS
B. Recommendation
A comprehensive review will be conducted by the Proposal Review Committee. Proposers will be evaluated, scored, and ranked based on the criteria specified in section X.A.2 of this RFP.
GLAZA and Zoo reserve the right to conduct such investigations as they consider appropriate with respect to the qualifications of each Proposer and any information contained in its Proposal.
C. Award
______Page 27
After the evaluation of the proposals and the interview process has been completed, the Proposal Review Committee will make a written recommendation for awarding a contract to Mayor and Council. The City reserves the right to accept or reject the recommendation. GLAZA will notify all Proposers of the contract award recommendation.
The Proposer to whom a contract is awarded shall be required to enter into a written contract with the City in a form approved by the City Attorney. This RFP and the successful Proposal, or any part thereof, will be incorporated and made a part of the final contract. However, the City reserves the right to further negotiate the terms of the contract with the selected Proposer. All work assigned to the Proposer under a resulting contract will be subject to approvals from any elected or appointed authority, e.g., City Council, Mayor, and no minimum level of work or funding is guaranteed.
The Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to verify the information received in the Proposal. If a Proposer knowingly and willfully submits false information or data, the Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to reject that proposal. If it is determined than a contract was awarded as a result of false statements or other data submitted in response to this RFP, the Zoo and GLAZA reserve the right to terminate the contract.
XI. PROTEST PROCEDURES
GLAZA will notify all Proposers of the contract award recommendation. All Proposers will be afforded the opportunity to protest the awarding of a contract under this RFP. Any protest must be submitted to the GLAZA RFP Coordinator in writing via U.S. mail within seven (7) calendar days of the mailing date of the notice of contract award recommendation. Proposers may appeal procedural issues only.
The procedure and time limits set forth in this paragraph are mandatory and are the Proposer’s sole and exclusive remedy in the event of a protest. Failure by a party originating a protest to comply with these procedures shall constitute a waiver of any right to further pursue the protest, including filing a Government Code claim or legal proceedings.
At a minimum, any written protest document must include the following:
• Name, address, and telephone number of the protesting party. • Name and number of this RFP. • Detailed statement of the legal and factual grounds of the protest, including copies of all relevant documents. The statement must also refer to the specific portion of the documents that form the basis of the protest. • Request for a ruling from GLAZA. • Statement as to the form of relief requested.
______Page 28 Written protests and any attached documentation must be sent to the following address:
Name: GLAZA RFP Coordinator /Concessions RFP Address: 5333 Zoo Dr. Los Angeles, CA 90027
The Zoo and GLAZA will consider the Proposal Review Committee’s recommendation for awarding a contract, together will all timely written protests and other pertinent information, and will select the Proposer to be awarded the contract and notify all Proposers of the final selection recommendation. City Council will exercise final authority in the selection of the contractor to be awarded through this RFP.
XII. STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR CITY CONTRACTS (Rev. 10/2017 v.3)
The Proposer that is awarded the Concession contract will be required to enter into a Concession Services Agreement with GLAZA. The Agreement conforms to the City’s contracting provisions. A copy of this RFP, the accepted Proposal, and the City’s Standard Provisions for City Contracts (Rev 10/17 v.3) will form a part of the Agreement. These include applicable requirements for contractors to do business with the City, and documentation thereof, including but not limited to, evidence of insurance and requirements for a Business Tax Registration Certificate. A copy of the City’s Standard Provisions for City Contracts (Rev 10/17 v.3) is included as Exhibit J of this RFP and is available at http://cao.lacity.org/risk/StandardProvisions.pdf.
XIII. EXHIBITS (contained in separate document)
A. Premises Map and Square Footage B. (B1 – B8) Los Angeles Zoo Venue Data C. Historical Revenue by Category D. Historical Revenue by Location E. Attendance History F. F1 – F9 Food Location Menu and Prices/Special Event Descriptions G. Current Commission Structure H. Sponsorships I. Pro Forma Financials Form J. City Standard Provisions 10/17 v.3 K. Los Angeles Zoo Vision Plan
______Page 29
XIV. REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
A. (J1 - J2) Insurance Requirements City and GLAZA B. Pro Forma Financials Form C. City Good Food Purchasing Policy D. City Contract History Form E. City Residence Info Form F. City Ethics Form 50 G. City Ethics Form 55 H. Affidavit of Non Collusion I. Business Inclusion Program J. Non Discrimination, Equal Employment, and Affirmative Action K. Americans with Disabilities Act L. Child Support Ordinance M. Contractor Responsibility Ordinance N. Equal Benefits Ordinance and First Source Hiring Ordinance O. Living Wage and Worker Retention Ordinance P. Slavery Disclosure/Border Wall Ordinance Q. Local Business Certification Affidavit of Eligibility R. Business Tax Registration S. Iran Contracting Act of 2010 Compliance Affidavit T. Internal Revenue Service W-9 Form U. Proposer’s Signature Declaration and Affidavit V. Draft Concession Services Agreement W. Disposition of Proposals
______Page 30
A. Insurance Requirements Form Gen. 146 (Rev. 6/12)
Required Insurance and Minimum Limits
Name: Date:
Agreement/Reference: Evidence of coverages checked below, with the specified minimum limits, must be submitted and approved prior to occupancy/start of operations. Amounts shown are Combined Single Limits ("CSLs"). For Automobile Liability, split limits may be substituted for a CSL if the total per occurrence equals or exceeds the CSL amount. Limits
Workers' Compensation (WC) and Employer's Liability (EL) WC Statutory EL Waiver of Subrogation in favor of City Longshore & Harbor Workers Jones Act
General Liability Products/Completed Operations Sexual Misconduct Fire Legal Liability
Automobile Liability (for any and all vehicles used for this contract, other than commuting to/from work)
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions)
Discovery Period
Property Insurance (to cover replacement cost of building - as determined by insurance company)
All Risk Coverage Boiler and Machinery Flood Builder's Risk Earthquake
Surety Bonds - Performance and Payment (Labor and Materials) Bonds
Crime Insurance
Other:
Insurance Requirements
The Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association requires that our major vendors and contractors, at their own expense, maintain the following minimum insurance coverages:
Commercial General Liability: Such insurance shall be on an occurrence basis providing single limit coverage in an amount of not less than $10,000,000 per occurrence and $20,000,000 in total, and shall include coverage for, but not limited to, premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, independent contractors, broad form property damage, host/liquor liability, advertising and personal injury and fire/explosion legal liability.
Direct “All Risk” Property Insurance: Direct damage, “all risk” property insurance to cover damage to Concession Premises and equipment. This shall include liability coverage on damage or harm to Zoo and/or GLAZA premises, animals, and exhibits in a minimum of $10,000,000 per occurrence.
Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability with a limit of liability of at least $1,000,000 each occurrence, covering all personnel employed either directly or by way of contract from any payroll service provider, and including sexual harassment. All California statutory limits must be provided.
Automobile Liability: Automobile liability covering all owned, operated and hired vehicles in an amount not less than $5,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
Additional Insureds
The Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association requires that our vendors and contractors provide us with certificates of insurance to cover the term of the event or agreement. The certificates of insurance shall include the term of the agreement and name the following entities as additional insureds pursuant to written contract:
GLAZA, the City of Los Angeles, and the City of Los Angeles Department of the Zoo, and their respective concessionaires, agents, trustees, officers, affiliates and employees
The policies must be maintained with insurance carriers rated by A.M. Best as A- or better. Contractor must notify GLAZA thirty (30) days prior to any material change in policy coverage. All policies, with the exception of workers’ compensation, shall be endorsed to add the above parties as additional insureds pursuant to written contract on a primary and non-contributory basis. All policies must be endorsed to provide a waiver of subrogation by the insurance carrier in favor of the City of Los Angeles, the City of Los Angeles Department of the Zoo, and GLAZA. B. PROFORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND MINIMUM ANNUAL GUARANTEE FORMS REQUIRED DOCUMENT B PROFORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUBMITTAL FORM LA ZOO FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND RETAIL OPERATIONS Pro o.ser Ope>r,Jtmg Proforma - By Cor1t,act Yea, 1 2 3 4 5 Revenue .. ______Food and Non-Ale Beverage Sales $ $ ~-1-s - • $ $ ______:J ------· - ! $ Alcoholic Beverag_e.~S_al_es~--·------i-.c.----$ $ - $ -,$ -1 Catering Sales $ - Is - $ $ . :·s.
Retail merchandise sales $ ------::7 $ $ $ $ - ,.. $ Tram ~- $ $ $ Photo Stroller rental $ $ $ $ $ Total Revenue: $ $ $ $ $
Cost of Goods $ $ $ $ $ GrossMamin $ $ $ $ $ Gross Maroin %
Exnenses: . - ·--··-·------+------+- Rent (Commission[ !$ - $ $ - ·s ·s Related Equipment $ - $ $ : : $ $ Food and Non-Ale. Be,~v~e~ra~g~e~S~a~le~s------+-c------i $ - $ $ - '$ $ Alcoholic Beveraoe Sales I S - ! $ $ $ $ -1 Other $ - . $ ·$ $ $ Total Rent: $ . , $ •$ $ $ Pavroll Costs Wages $ $ $ -$ $ Payroll Taxes $ $ $ $ $ Health Insurance & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ Workers' Compensation Insurance $ $ $ -f $ Total Pavroll Costs $ $ $ $ $
Variable Costs ACcounting $ - $ $ $ -'$ Advertising, Marketing & Promotion 1.5% $ . $ $ $ - ; $ Dues & Subscriptions ··- - ··· · $ $ $ . $ $ ·· ·E'rlVironmental Costs :s - $ $ - '$ $ Equipment Replacement - Small $ - $ $ - : $ $ Eauioment Reolacement - Large '.$"" $ - $ --:ls $ - ·Legal 1$ '$ - $ $ $ -1 Office Expenses '$ ; $ $ $ $ Payroll PrOOOSSiriQ"Fees $ - • $ i S $ $ Professional Services $ - I$ ' $ $ Ji" $ $ .. ~~P.•_ir & Ma int - 1 % $ $ ------·--. - $ Repair & Maint - Building $ $ ~ i·s-· $ $ Supplies $ $ - Is $ $ Start u.e_Exp.enses :Yr 1 $ $ $ ----·-·------$ $ Telephone $ $ $ $ $ Travel & Entertainment $ $ r--- $ $ Utilities ...$ $ $ $ • ' $ -other __ _ $ $ $ $ - i $ $ $ -$--$ $ - '$ $ $ $ - $ Total Variable Exoenses $ $ $ $ $ Proposer ------1------j------~ Fixed Costs Depreciation $ $ $ _ _..:..il_ $ Insurance & Liabilitv $ $ $ -iS $ . _ Service Contracts ·-----·----,..."------j--=------+-"------.:c_$ $ $ $ __ _ $ Licenses $ $ $ - '$ $ Other $ $ $ - i $ $ ----- $. $ $ $ ... $--$ $ $ $ $ Total Fixed Expenses $ $ $ $ $ 1 ota/ Operating cxi,enses: $ $ !$ $ $
Profit Before Interest and Taxes $ $ :s $ $ Debt Expense $ $ - I $ $ $ Taxes $ $ $ $ $- Other $ $ f $ - Is Net Profit: $ $ $ $ 1$ Break Even Analvsi.s $ $ $ $ $ REQUIRED DOCUMENT B PROFORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUBMITTAL FORM LA ZOO FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND RETAIL OPERATION Prop0$er ...... Revenue: ::~~~: :e::~;e·-Bs=e:-7-:s~ag~e_Sa_l_e_s____ _, ______.____ _ 1 Catering Sales ------·-·--·--·-·-----··•-·•- ·------·------l Retail merchandise sales -·------·--·-----·--·------Tram Photo, Stroller rental t------·---·--·--·-·-'-·-·••><-••-~·------~----·---•-~------·------1 t-O'--t"'he""r______-+------·- - --···------·--·------·------l r.c=-o-s7t-of=-G=-o-o_d.,..s------+-·----·------·------·------i
Exnenses: 1-R.. e_n .. t ______-+ - - ·------·------······--··-··------Related Eauip111eccn.:,t------+------·------·- -··----·----·-·-·--·-·--·------1 Food and Non-'-AJ"'.c:..:B::.e::.:v:.:e::.cra::.sge..:e'------+------·- ·-·--·---·-··--·-··------.------1 AlcoholicOther Beverage··· ~------+------···------·------·- ·------·-----·------·------l
Pav roll Costs -----·-·-·-·------·---·---·------1 Wages ______,... _, ______-·-----·------·------; HealthPayroll InsuranceTaxes -=-=--=& Benefits------1i---·------··------i WorkeriCompensation Insurance ·--·-·----·--··-·------, 1-V-a-ri_a_b-le-C~o-s_ts_~------+- - ···---···------·---·- - - ··------; r-;-,A"'c"'co·u""n""ti-ng------+------·------·-·--·-·------·------, ,___A_d_v_ert_i_si~ng-.,~M_a_r_ke_t_in~g&_P_ro_m_o_ti_o_n___ -+------···----·--·--··"------·• - -·------1 f--=D_u:;::e.=.s..,&;_S::.:u::::bc::s..:;cr"'ip:..:tti:.:co:.cns=------+------·------·------·--- f-._;E;c.n'-"v"-1·ro~n~m~e~n'°ta=cl-.,Cc.:o..:cst.:.:s___ ------+-- ---·--·----··---·---·-·---- -·------Eauioment Reolacement - Small f--=-'=~~:=c.;.c.==~==-----+----Eauioment Replacement - Larae ------·-·------·----- 1-...;Le'e:'c"aa~I-=------+------·-·--··-··-·--·-·-·.. ·· ------·------·------1 1--,0,_ffi~1ce-::E-:::XP,.._'e_n_se...,s_cc------+------··------·------··------t--:P:-a...,.._vro_ll...,P_ro_ce.,..,,s_si-ng~-F-ee_s______-+ __ ._ ,______··-··--·---- Professional Services Repair& Maint. - FF&E ------, ,__R_e~p.a_ir_&_M_a_i_nt_._-_B_ui_ld_in~g------+·------··----.--··--··---·----··-···--·--·------, Supplies ______------·------·-•-··------. ,-~S~t_art_up~E_xp~e_n_s_es_-_Y_r_1 ______--+•-• .- ·------··---···- -- ·-·------l 1--..,T,::e:::le:c;:plh~on":e:--c--:-..,..---..,..------+------·-··------·-·------•-·· Travel & Entertainment 1-...,u,..,t.,..ilit_ie_s______Other ------·--·--·----··------1 1------+------·----.•····---- -••------·------·-----i
Fixed Costs i-;..... Oeoreciationa,,,,a;...,,..______-+- - ·----.------·------·-·-··------l Insurance & Liabilitv t--""==~===------+-Service Contracts ------1 Licenses other
------<••·---- -·-·-·------1 ~D,...e~b~t~E~XP'e~n~s~e------+-----Taxes ----·------· - ··--·····-·-----·--···--··-----·--···-·------·------1 Other
------~--- REQUIRED DOCUMENT B PROFORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUBMITTAL FORM LA ZOO FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND RETAIL OPERATION Proposer Cash Flow - By Contract Year 1 2 3 4 5 I ' I I •' Capital Loan $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Private Funds $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Operating Profits $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Plus: Depreciation $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Change in Accounts Payable $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Change in Payroll Payable $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other $ - $ -- - $ - $ - $ -
Other ·- $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Sources OfCash $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Uses of Cash
Capital Investment -· .. ------�. -- Change in Accounts Receivables --·. � -- - . -- Change in Inventory ·---� - Repayment of Loan Principal -~~·. - --- Other Total Uses of Cash $ - $ - $ - $ - I$ -
Net Change in Cash Flow $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Break Even Cash Flow $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - C. Good Food Purchasing Program ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA MAYOR
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE NO. 24
Issue Date: October 24, 2012
Subject: Good Food Purchasing Policy
Introduction
The Los Angeles regional foodshed, which we define as spanning the 200 mile, ten county region around the City (Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura), is among our co4ntry's largest producers of fruits, vegetables, and nuts. At the same time, only about half of Los Angeles County residents eat the recommended five servings of fruits and vegetables per day. We face an obesity pandemic-which costs LA County billions of dollars annually in heath care costs-and yet a hunger epidemic. Over one million City residents face food insecurity.
By leveraging its purchasing power, the City has the opportunity not only to enact our Good Food for All Agenda, which promotes Good Food (food that is healthy, affordable, fair, and sustainable), but we also have the ability to incentivize and encourage our regional food system as a whole, to make Good Food more widely available to all Angelenos. Directing our food purchases can encourage greater production of sustainably produced food, healthy eating habits, respect for worker's rights, and support for the local business economy by providing new opportunities for small and mid-sized farmers and job creation along the food supply chain. Therefore, I am directing all City departments with food purchases of greater than $10,000 annually, through their department budgets and/or contracts and concessions, to adopt the Good Food Purchasing Pledge and initiate plans to follow the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Food Service Institutions ("Good Food Purchasing Guidelines" or "Guidelines").
These Guidelines lay out priorities for offering nutritious menu options, and purchasing food that is healthy, locally produced, and sustainably grown by farms that treat their workers with respect and use humane animal treatment practices.
200 NORTH SPRING STREET • Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 PHONE: (213) 978-0600 • FAX: (213) 978-0750 EMAIL: [email protected] Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa Executive Directive No. 24 Page 2 of 3
These Guidelines have been developed by our Office in collaboration with the Los Angeles Food Policy Council, an initiative of my Office. This policy has taken into account the viewpoints of stakeholders from all aspects of the food system including farm owners, food distributors, public health departments, food chain workers, restaurants, and other large institutional food purchasers, to name a few. The Guidelines are summarized below and included in full along with the Good Food Purchasing Pledge as an appendix to this directive. Summarv of the Good Food Purchasing Pledge and Good Food Purchasing Guidelines
The Good Food Purchasing Pledge is a commitment to improving our region's food system through the adoption and implementation of the Los Angeles Good Food Purchasing Guidelines. While this directive is aimed at City departments with food purchases of greater than $10,000 annually, through their department budgets and/or contracts and concessions, I would like to see even greater participation. I invite other food service institutions, including those in the public, and private for profit and non-profit sectors also to adopt the Good Food Purchasing Pledge.
The Good Food Purchasing Guidelines emphasize five values: • Local Economies -,Small and mid-sized agricultural and food processing operations within the local area or region; • Environmental Sustainability- Sustainable production systems that conserve soil and water, emphasize good pest management practices, and protect and enhance wildlife habitat and biodiversity; • Valued Workforce- Safe and healthy working conditions and fair compensation for all food chain workers and producers from production to consumption; • Animal Welfare - Healthy and humane care for livestock; and • Nutrition- Foods that promote health and well-being by offering generous portions of vegetables, fruit, and whole grains and reducing salt, added sugars, fats, and oils, and eliminating artificial additives.
The Good Food Purchasing Guidelines outline a series of steps toward implementation that include, among other things, the following features: • A baseline that must be maintained throughout participation; • Multi-year benchmarks that recognize the time it takes to make changes and allow the shift to occur incrementally; • A tiered value system that recognizes and rewards higher tiers of achievement; • Traceability by asking purchasers to work with suppliers to establish transparent reporting systems to verify product source; and • Annual progress reports to ensure continuous achievement and improvement. Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa Executive Directive No. 24 Page 3 of 3
Review and Adoption of the Good Food Purchasing Pledge and Good Food Purchasing Guidelines
All City departments with food purchases of greater than $10,000 annually, through their department budgets and/or contracts and concessions, shall adopt the Good Food Purchasing Pledge and initiate plans to follow the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines. The departments will sign the pledge and commit to implementing the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines in all future food procurement, and make best efforts to incorporate the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines into new contracts for food purchases.
Departments that control their own funds, including proprietary departments, with food purchases of greater than $10,000 annually, through their department budgets and/or contracts and concessions, are strongly encouraged to adopt the Good Food Purchasing Pledge and commit to implementing the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines.
The Guidelines establish a multi-star grading system for affected departments, one star being the minimum level of compliance, five stars being the maximum. Upon adopting the pledge, affected departments will review their existing purchasing policies and practices and a,ssess compliance levels with the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines, witH the goal of complying with the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines at the one star level as soon as possible. All such departments will make their best efforts to achieve a five star rating within five years.
Reporting My Office will work with affected departments during the next six months to develop plans for implementing and reporting practices that reach the baseline benchmark and assess their annual progress. Within six months of this directive, all affected City departments will then have a plan for implementing and reporting practices that reach the baseline benchmark to be recognized as Good Food Purchasers. At that time, all departments will also have implemented continuous improvement practices as they are outlined in the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines. Thereafter, all departments will report their food procurement policies, practices, and progress annually to the City Administrative Officer for tracking and evaluation.
Mayor The Good Food Purchasing Pledge
WE COMMIT OUR INSTITUTION TO TAKING THE FOLLOWING STEPS IN SUPPORT OF GOOD FOOD: ➊ As outlined in the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Food Service Institutions, we commit to annually increasing our procurement of Good Food to meet multi-year benchmarks at the baseline level or beyond for five value categories – local economies, environmental sustainability, valued workforce, animal welfare, and nutrition. IN PLEDGING OUR SUPPORT FOR GOOD FOOD, we will use our purchasing power to encourage the ➋ production and consumption of food that is healthy, Establish supply chain accountability and a traceability affordable, fair, and sustainable. We recognize that the system with vendors/distributors to verify sourcing adoption of food procurement policies has the power commitments, assess current food procurement practices, and compile assessment results in a progress report. to reform the food system, create opportunities for smaller farmers to thrive, provide just compensation and fair treatment for workers, support sustainable ➌ Report annually on implementation progress of the farming practices, reward good environmental stewardship, Good Food Purchasing Guidelines. and increase access to fresh and healthy foods.
We pledge to leverage our purchasing power to support the TO GUIDE IMPLEMENTATION, following values: WE COMMIT TO THE FOLLOWING TIMELINE: — Local Economies: support small and mid-sized agricultural and food processing operations within the local area or region. — Environmental Sustainability: source from producers that ➊ Complete a baseline Good Food Purchasing survey employ sustainable production systems that reduce within one month of signing the Good Food Purchasing Pledge. or eliminate synthetic pesticides and fertilizers; avoid the use of hormones, antibiotics, and genetic engineering; conserve soil and water; protect and enhance wildlife habitat and ➋ Communicate Good Food commitment to all suppliers, biodiversity; and reduce on-farm energy consumption including distributors and food service companies within one and greenhouse gas emissions. month of the adoption of the Good Food Purchasing Pledge. — Valued Workforce: provide safe and healthy working conditions and fair compensation to all food chain workers and producers, from production to consumption. ➌ Complete an assessment of food purchasing practices within — Animal Welfare: provide healthy and humane care for livestock. six months of the adoption of the Good Food Purchasing Pledge. — Nutrition: promote health and well-being by offering generous portions of vegetables, fruit, and whole grains; reducing salt, added sugars, fats, and oils; and by eliminating artificial additives. ➍ Develop and adopt a multi-year action plan with benchmarks to comply with the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines within the Signed by first year of the adoption to the Good Food Purchasing Pledge and share action plans with the Los Angeles Food Policy Council. Signature
Title ➎ Incorporate the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Name of Institution Food Service Institutions into new RFPs and contracts, where applicable. Date PROGRAM COMPONENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW: GOOD FOOD PURCHASING GUIDELINES — Multi-Year Benchmarks: Purchasers are asked to meet benchmarks in years one and five, recognizing that the shift Los Angeles Food Policy Council (LAFPC), in collaboration towards Good Food purchasing will take time, and purchasers with public, private, and non-profit partners, developed will need to make incremental changes. Good Food Purchasing Guidelines, model guidelines for food — Tiered-Value System: A tiered-value system has been service establishments in assessing and purchasing Good Food developed to evaluate the potential contribution of purchases — food that is healthy, affordable, fair, and sustainable. to a Good Food Purchasing initiative. For each of the five values, foods are ranked from Level One (baseline) through Scaled similarly to LEED green building certification, the Level Three (highest). Higher tiers of achievement are rewarded Good Food Purchasing Guidelines emphasize five key values: with more points accordingly. — Ranked Criteria: For most value categories, third-party (1) Local Economies certifications and label claims allowed by USDA or FDA (2) Environmental Sustainability (3) Valued Workforce are used to determine the level of “Good” achieved by an (4) Animal Welfare institution’s purchases. These third-party certifications are used (5) Nutrition to rank Good Food purchases as Levels One (baseline), Two, or Three within each value category. — Baseline Requirements: A baseline in each category is About the Los Angeles Food Policy Council established that must be maintained throughout participation The Los Angeles Food Policy Council (LAFPC) is a collective in the program. impact initiative created by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa in — Good Food Recognition: Purchasers are scored and January of 2011. LAFPC’s mission is to build a Good Food recognized at different levels to reward higher Good Food system for all Los Angeles residents. Such a system ensures sourcing commitments within value categories. Purchasers that food is healthy, affordable, fair, and sustainable in that meet the baseline level for each category receive order to improve the health and well-being of our residents, Good Food Purchaser recognition (one star). Additional particularly in low-income communities and communities of levels (two to five stars) are awarded to purchasers color; promotes a thriving Good Food economy for everyone; to recognize the most dedicated supporters of the and strengthens agricultural and environmental stewardship Good Food Purchasing Guidelines. throughout the region. LAFPC coordinates the expertise — Traceability: Purchasers are asked to work with suppliers and leadership of public, private, nonprofit, and academic to establish transparent reporting systems to verify partners to strengthen connections across the food system. product source. The Food Policy Council and its staff serve as the “backbone” — Compliance Plan: If vendor and/or suppliers do not have organization for the initiative, which has an extended reach of a current capacity to meet food purchasing targets, the vendor approximately 300 individuals and over 150 organizations. may submit a plan to achieve full compliance at a baseline level by the end of year one. LAFPC leverages its unique structure and placement as an — Annual Report: Purchasers are asked to report annually independent multi-stakeholder initiative within the Mayor’s on their progress. Office to advance innovative food policies. LAFPC combines — Promotion: The City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles coalition-building, leadership development, and issue and Food Policy Council will regularly promote and celebrate policy advocacy to advance food policies and programmatic Good Food institutional commitments. Successful participants innovations. The council’s goal is to shift our regional food in the Good Food Purchasing Pledge program can also serve as system to promote local growers, sustainable agriculture, and an inspiration and positive role model for other institutions in fair working conditions for all food workers, and to ensure our region. access to healthy affordable food in underserved communities.
For more information, contact [email protected].
The Good Food Purchasing Pledge Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Food Service Institutions
Los Angeles Food Policy Council
1 2 Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Food Service Institutions
Los Angeles Food Policy Council
October 2012
GOODFOODLA.ORG
3 Los Angeles Food Policy Council Report Production
Martin Anenberg FreshPoint Southern California PRIMARY AUTHORS Andrea Azuma C ommunity Benefit, Alexa Delwiche Los Angeles Food Policy Council Kaiser Permanente Southern California Joann Lo Food Chain Workers Alliance David Binkle Food Services Division, Jill Overdorf Coosemans Shipping Los Angeles Unified School District Vanessa Zajfen San Diego Unified School District Omar Brownson Los Angeles River Revitalization Corporation RESEARCH SUPPORT Glen Dake Los Angeles Amira Hasenbush Community Garden Council Anisha Hingorani Paula Daniels Office of Mayor Villaraigosa, Katie Hoeberling City of Los Angeles Colleen McKinney Michael Flood Los Angeles Regional Food Bank Kimberly Tomicich Gwendolyn Flynn Community Health Councils Robert Gottlieb Urban & Environmental EDITORIAL REVIEW Policy Institute, Occidental College Paula Daniels Los Angeles Food Policy Council Renee Guilbault Pret A Manger and Office of Mayor Villaraigosa, Glenda Humiston California Rural Development, City of Los Angeles U.S. Department of Agriculture Helena Jubany Fresco Community Market GRAPHIC DESIGN AG Kawamura Orange County Produce Juliette Bellocq Gregg Kettles Office of Mayor Villaraigosa, and Yuju Yeo handbuiltstudio.com City of Los Angeles Evan Kleiman Good Food, KCRW © 2012 Los Angeles Food Policy Council Amy Knoll Fraser Grace + BLD Restaurants Mary M. Lee PolicyLink Miguel Luna Urban Semillas Phil McGrath McGrath Family Farms Roman Pinal United Farm Workers Michael Roberts Center for Food Law & Policy, UCLA School of Law Bruce Saito Los Angeles Conservation Corps Catherine Schneider Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles Matthew Sharp California Food Policy Advocates Dr. Paul Simon Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Dr. Rachel Surls University of California Cooperative Extension, Los Angeles County Daniel Tellalian Emerging Markets Robert Tse California Rural Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture Alex Weiser Weiser Family Farms Goetz Wolff Department of Urban Planning, UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs Larry Yee F ood Commons
4 Acknowledgements
The Good Food Purchasing Guidelines Jim Cochran Swanton Berry Farm & Food Commons for Food Service Institutions was Cindy Crawford Kaiser Permanente Southern California made possible by the generous George Faraday Change to Win contributions, guidance, and expertise Clare Fox Los Angeles Food Policy Council of many individuals. Steve Goodman West Central Produce Robert Gottlieb Urban & Environmental Policy Institute, CONTRIBUTORS Occidental College The Los Angeles Food Policy Council Kari Hamerschlag Environmental Working Group would especially like to thank the Glenda Humiston California Rural Development, following individuals for providing U.S. Department of Agriculture sustained guidance and direction Jonathan Kaplan Natural Resources Defense Council during the development of our A.G. Kawamura Orange County Produce guidelines. Kendra Klein Physicians for Social Responsibility/ Health Care Without Harm Andrea Azuma C ommunity Benefit, Bob Knight Old Grove Orange, Inc Kaiser Permanente Southern California Michael Leighs Los Angeles County Department David Binkle Food Services Division, of Public Health* Los Angeles Unified School District Toni Liquori School Food Focus Devorah Brous Netiya Dan Madsen Gold Star Foods Karl Bruskotter Office of Sustainability and the Erik Nicholson United Farm Workers Environment, City of Santa Monica Athena Pappas California Produce Wholesaler Elizabeth Epstein Kathleen Reed Kaiser Permanente Renee Guilbault Pret A Manger Lucia Sayre Physicians for Social Responsibility Dana Gunders Natural Resources Defense Council Health Care Without Harm Jacqueline Hernandez American Heart Association Dipa Shah Los Angeles County Cheryl Leahy Compassion Over Killing Department of Public Health* Sean Leer Gold Star Foods Matt Sharp California Food Policy Advocates Josephine Miller Office of Sustainability and the Andy Shrader Office of Councilmember Paul Koretz, Environment, City of Santa Monica Los Angeles City Council Fritz Stelter Field Fresh Foods Dr. Paul Simon Los Angeles County Michelle Wood Los Angeles County Department of Public Health* Department of Public Health* Dr. Rachel Surls University of California Cooperative Extension, REVIEWERS Los Angeles County The Los Angeles Food Policy Council Daniel Tellalian Emerging Markets was fortunate to receive invaluable Marc Ross input on our guidelines from the Mark Vallianatos Urban & Environmental following individuals: Policy Institute, Occidental College Jesse Warnken LA Specialties Alexandra Agajanian Sustainable Economic Enterprises Yelena Zeltzer Urban & Environmental Los Angeles Policy Institute, Occidental College Martin Anenberg FreshPoint Southern California Eric Batch American Heart Association Jaya Bhumitra Compassion Over Killing * REVIEWER ONLY PROVIDED FEEDBACK ON NUTRITION GUIDELINES. Sandy Brown Swanton Berry Farm & Geography Department, UC Berkeley Danny Calvillo Sunrise Produce Sharon Cech Urban & Environmental Policy Institute, Occidental College
5 Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
6 Table of Contents
Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Food Service Institutions / page 09
— What Is Good Food Procurement? / page 10 — The Importance of Good Food Procurement / page 10 — Implementing a Good Food Program / page 11 — Budgeting for Good Food / page 12 — Methodology for Assessing Good Food Procurement / page 12 — Good Food Purchasing Program Goals / page 12 — Scoring System Examples / page 13
Value 1: Local Economies Purchasing Goals / page 16
Value 2: Environmental Sustainability Purchasing Goals / page 18
Value 3: Valued Workforce Purchasing Goals / page 22
Value 4: Animal Welfare Purchasing Goals / page 24
Value 5: Nutrition Goals / page 26
APPENDIX A: Glossary of Terms / page 31
APPENDIX B: Good Food Purchasing Resource Guide / page 37
APPENDIX C: LOCAL PRODUCT AVAILABILITY (LOS ANGELES) / page 41
7 Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
8 Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Food Service Institutions
Food system transformation depends on large-scale shifts in the demand for and the subsequent purchasing of Good Food. By practicing Good Food purchasing methods, institutions can support food systems that are healthy, ecologically sound, economically viable, socially responsible, and humane. Universities and schools, hospitals, local governments, restaurants, and other institutions with food service venues are beginning to explore the opportunities afforded by thoughtful and value-based purchasing. By exercising their buying power, the purchasing practices of food service institutions can make a major difference in heightening the demand for and availability of Good Food.
The Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for Food Service Institutions is designed for public and private food enterprises in Los Angeles County and beyond to assist with their development of Good Food purchasing strategies. The guidelines include suggested measures and practical steps to implementing Good Food measures. The guidelines emphasize the following values:
— L ocal Economies: Support small and mid-sized agricultural and food processing operations within the local area or region. — E nvironmental Sustainability: Source from producers that employ sustainable production systems that reduce or eliminate synthetic pesticides and fertilizers; avoid the use of hormones, antibiotics, and genetic engineering; conserve soil and water; protect and enhance wildlife habitat and biodiversity; and reduce on-farm energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. — V alued Workforce: Provide safe and healthy working conditions and fair compensation for all food chain workers and producers from production to consumption. — Animal Welfare: Provide healthy and humane care for livestock. — N utrition: Promote health and well-being by offering generous portions of vegetables, fruit, and whole grains; reducing salt, added sugars, fats, and oils; and eliminating artificial additives.
GOOD FOOD IS DEFINED BY THE LOS ANGELES FOOD POLICY COUNCIL AS FOOD THAT IS:
HEALTHY FAIR Foods meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and All participants in the food supply chain receive fair provide freedom from chronic ailment. compensation and fair treatment, free of exploitation. Food is delicious and safe. High quality food is equitable and physically and culturally accessible to all. SUSTAINABLE Food is produced, processed, distributed, and recycled AFFORDABLE locally using the principles of environmental stewardship Foods that people of all income levels can purchase. (in terms of water, soil, and pesticide management). accessible to all.
9 By suggesting opportunities to assess existing policies and Good Food sourcing benefits may include: methodologies within each establishment, this guide is — E conomic: Support of local and regional farmers and intended to provide tools to help create a shift to a more food businesses, returning to the local economy three diversified and resilient food system, with sustainable times the purchase price of a food product purchased and ethical sourcing of food in all levels of food service from out of state; operations. Good Food production, purchasing, and — E nvironmental: Reduction of food miles, greenhouse consumption will require coordinated multi-sector adoption gases, carbon footprints, and pollution; promotion of soil and engagement with participants who are willing to adhere fertility, human and animal health, and the conservation to an established minimum of Good Food procurement, of water and biodiversity; outlined in this document. Included in this document is — N utritional: Encouragement of increased purchasing of a tiered assessment of values to help procurement and whole foods and local produce that is fresher and has a purchasing offices determine the current state of their higher nutritional content, due to the shorter period of farmers and other vendors. This guide is a first step in time between harvest and sale; creating a comprehensive Good Food program that will — Social: Transformation of the supply chain, rewarding inform, encourage, support and promote food service farmers and food businesses for environmentally establishments of all sizes to become Good Food leaders in sustainable and socially responsible business practices. their communities. Large-scale demand for Good Food is fundamental to building the market for Good Food. By increasing the WHAT IS GOOD FOOD PROCUREMENT? demand, and thus the infrastructure to distribute Good Food, it will become easier for more institutions to participate. The term procurement refers to the sourcing and purchasing Strong and steady demand for Good Food will increase its of food to supply food service operations. This process is affordability and availability in all communities. much more complex than it may appear on the surface or to one unfamiliar with commercial food service operations. Hospitals, universities, schools, and restaurants in Procurement involves identifying the food needs of the Los Angeles have spearheaded the adoption of local customer base for the food service operation, specifying and sustainable food procurement policies and these product requirements, identifying suppliers, taking deliveries, innovators should be looked to as local leaders in proving inspecting and storing items, and, depending on the size of that, by changing the way one purchases, institutions can the operation, soliciting and evaluating bids and proposals, create opportunities for regional farmers to thrive, for controlling inventory, and paying suppliers. These guidelines workers to receive just compensation and fair treatment, are designed to assist an individual tasked with implementing for local economies to continue to rebuild, and for a Good Food program in their food service operation. reducing our environmental footprint. These outcomes can be accomplished while also increasing access to and consumption of fresh and nutritious food, particularly THE IMPORTANCE OF GOOD FOOD in underserved communities. The goal of a Good Food PROCUREMENT procurement system is to bring multiple benefits to all Institutions of all kinds, from K-12 schools, universities, communities by impacting health, social well-being, bottom- and hospitals, to corporate cafeterias and local government line business success, and the environment. agencies, are major purchasers and servers of food. They are therefore in a unique position to influence food supply Public institutions, in particular, play a critical role in chains. Due to the collective large purchasing volume, increasing access to Good Food. institutional demand for Good Food can encourage suppliers Through their reach to some of the most vulnerable to shift their production practices in order to supply populations, including seniors and children, public programs environmentally sustainable, socially responsible, and healthy help ensure that all Angelenos have access to the healthiest food products. foods. These agencies purchase food to provide meals to people in public hospitals, child-care centers, schools, senior programs, jails, and juvenile facilities. Such programs and institutions provide a buffer against hunger, food insecurity
10 and also serve as a primary source of nutrition for millions of IMPLEMENTING A GOOD FOOD PROGRAM residents. Public and private institutions also purchase food to sell to employees and the public in retail outlets such as Before implementing changes, operations should assess: vending machines, cafeterias, and concession stands. — What are the advantages to your institution and the community for purchasing Good Food? Various Los Angeles wholesale food companies have — What percentage of currently purchased food is already implemented local food lines and certify that their products local, sustainable, and fairly produced? fall within a variety of parameters. This practice has expanded — What barriers will limit participation in the program? into processing lines and local fruits and vegetables can — Are there extra transportation costs affiliated with now be purchased to create a line of value-added products purchasing an increased volume in local products? that are verified as locally sourced (i.e. carrot sticks, bagged — What are the additional processing costs affiliated with salads, crudités, etc.). purchasing local? What methods exist for offsetting such costs? Los Angeles nutrition education programs such as the — What types of local, sustainable, and fairly produced California Department of Public Health and Network for products do existing distributors or vendors offer? a Healthy California’s Harvest of the Month program, — How will your institution communicate the changes to administered by LAUSD in 250 Los Angeles schools, and consumers and employees? some of the Los Angeles county WIC-Only stores are using guidelines that state that their Good Food is sourced from: Prior to implementation, it is also critical to develop — Farms within 200 miles of the final service of the product operational definitions for words that will be used in Good — Farms that are less than 200 acres Food bids; words like: sustainable, fair, local, or humane — Farms that provide more than five items annually need to have clear criteria and a means for measurement and (this excludes mono-cropping and allows for crop diversity compliance (see Appendix A for our glossary of terms). and better soil management) Compliance and/or meeting Good Food objectives will more often than not fall to producers, food distributors, and Over time, Good Food purchases, from both large and small processors. Without a direct relationship to farmers, ensuring institutions, can add up to significant investments in a sustainability of foods and beverages requires access to sustainable regional food system. information about the value chain and the farms that produced such foods. Outside of a personal relationship with producers, third-party labels (CCOF, AGA Grassfed, etc.) are useful tools for ensuring sustainability if they are grounded in verifiability.
Most distributors are willing to take on the task of providing origins of their product, particularly if there is a long-term sales opportunity. Often the simple act of asking distributors how they will meet Good Food requirements indicates to suppliers that sustainability and health are important for an institution. Distributors will work with the buyer to develop a qualified Good Food program with buyer-specified parameters.
11 BUDGETING FOR GOOD FOOD METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING GOOD FOOD PROCUREMENT Sustainable foods are generally associated with higher prices than conventional foods, thus creating little incentive A tiered value system has been developed to evaluate for increasing purchases. However, there are a variety the potential contribution of purchases to a Good Food of strategies food service venues can employ to offset Purchasing Program. A baseline in each category is increased costs associated with purchasing higher quality established that must be maintained throughout participation foods. In 2012, Los Angeles Unified School District was able in the program with qualifications noted at both the one to improve meal quality, increase the percent of produce year and five year goal levels. By creating goals for a first purchased and source approximately 70 percent of that year of completion through a five-year implementation plan, produce locally (within 200 miles), while their food budget a great opportunity is created for thoughtful, strategic and remained constant, despite rising food prices nationally. progressive sourcing and menu development. A recent study prepared for UCLA Housing & Hospitality Services found that four UC campuses with sustainable The tiered value system allows for purchasers to participate food policies – Davis, Berkeley, San Diego, and Santa at varying levels and to scale up their Good Food purchasing Cruz – showed little, if any, increase in per plate costs after over time. Within each value category, purchasers may sustainable spending. Retailers have found as they increase choose to participate at Levels One, Two or Three. Level One Good Food purchases, suppliers increase production and, criteria within each value category are assigned one point. subsequently, food prices fall. Level Two criteria for each value category are more rigorous than Level One and are assigned two points. Level Three Strategies for offsetting increased costs include: criteria within each value category are the premier levels of — Re-designing menus to incorporate less meat and achievement in the program and are assigned three points. processed food; — Buying produce in season; Purchasers that meet the baseline level for each category are — Creating direct relationships with suppliers; awarded with Good Food Purchaser recognition. A purchaser — Partnering with other food purchasing departments or must score a minimum of five points to meet baseline institutions to leverage purchasing volume; requirements as a participant in the Good Food Purchasing — Increasing sustainable food purchases incrementally; Program and receive one star. Purchasers scoring 10-14 — Purchasing foods from produce aggregation hubs points receive two stars, purchasers scoring 15-19 points (Regional Food Hubs); receive three stars, purchasers scoring 20-24 points receive — Increasing water and energy efficiency (e.g. by eliminating four stars, and purchasers scoring 25 points or more receive trays); and five stars. Good Food Purchasers with five stars represent — Buying lower on the beauty chain (e.g., smaller and less the most dedicated supporters of the Good Food Purchasing aesthetically perfect produce) is less expensive and helps Guidelines. These Good Food Purchasing Guidelines are farmers sell more of what they grow. easily modified for any national food service company or government agency. The guidelines suggested in this document were identified with full acknowledgement of the very real constraints and GOOD FOOD PURCHASING PROGRAM GOALS tight budgets institutions face when trying to provide their The following Good Food goals have been adapted from customers the highest quality food. To establish varying a variety of local and sustainable food purchasing policies degrees of Good Food compliance, these guidelines including the City of New York, Kaiser Permanente, Emory outline tiers of adoption for food service outlets based on University, Yale University, and University of California and procurement standards. Purchasers will need to identify are a suggested benchmark for purchasers developing or their initial purchasing priorities and incorporate additional implementing a Good Food purchasing program. Food standards and levels of adoption in the next stages of the service facilities can adjust percentages as necessary with the development of their program. goal of gradually increasing their Good Food purchases.
12 GOOD FOOD PURCHASING COMMITMENT LEVELS
Good Food Good Food Good Food Good Food Good Food Purchaser Purchaser Purchaser Purchaser Purchaser
5 – 9 10 – 14 15 – 19 20 – 24 25+ Points Needed Points Needed Points Needed Points Needed Points Needed
BASELINE REQUIREMENT ACCUMULATION OF POINTS
All Good Food Purchasers must score at least one point Cumulative points may be earned if purchasers comply in each value category. simultaneously with different commitment levels within a particular value category. —Example MIXING LEVELS AND VALUES From the Environmental Sustainability category, Points may be earned by mixing various commitment participants can earn 6 points by fulfilling all the different levels and value categories. requirements for Levels 1, 2 and 3. —Example 2 points from Level 2 of Nutrition + 1 point from Level 1 EXPECTATIONS FOR INCREASED COMMITMENT of Animal Welfare = 3 points total After one year of participation in the program, purchasers will be expected to gradually increase the amount of Good Food that they purchase in order to maintain the same number of points. See Good Food Purchasing Guidelines for more details.
SCORING SYSTEM EXAMPLES
These two hypothetical examples will help Good Food Purchasers understand how the Good Food Purchasing Pledge scoring system works. In both of the following examples, the institutions earn three-star ratings (requiring 15-19 points), but each organization takes a different approach.
VALUE 12345 VALUE 12345 LEVELS LEVELS
EXTRA POINTS 2 1 EXTRA POINTS 1 12
LEVEL 3 3 3 LEVEL 3 33
LEVEL 2 2 2 LEVEL 2 2 22
LEVEL 1 1 1 LEVEL 1 1 1
TOTAL TOTAL 15 Good Food 18 Good Food POINTS = POINTS = Purchaser Purchaser 13 Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
14 An Overview of Good Food Values
Procurement suggestions will focus on sourcing products that align with these Good Food principles:
LOCAL ECONOMIES (LOCAL FOOD) VALUED WORKFORCE (FAIR FOOD) — Use local, seasonally available ingredients from — Choose food products that ensure safe and healthy community supported, small and medium sized working conditions, fair compensation, and a voice farms and food processing facilities, to maintain local at work for all food chain workers and producers economies, create jobs, prevent sprawl, preserve from production to consumption. farmlands, provide fresher food, and minimize — Choose food and drink products that ensure a fair transport and storage. If local ingredients are not deal for producers and workers in developing nations available, use regional or at a minimum, domestic, and economies. ingredients. ANIMAL WELFARE (HUMANE FOOD) ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY — If animal products are a featured menu item, ensure (ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE FOOD) that meat, dairy products, and eggs are produced — Specify food from farming systems that minimize using high verifiable animal welfare standards which harm to the environment:, such as certified organic consumers would consider to be significantly higher farms, farms offering high bio-diversity of crop yield, than standard industry practices. farms actively reducing risk created through pesticide use, and soil enrichment and water conservation NUTRITION (HEALTHY FOOD) programs. — Promote health and well-being by offering generous — Avoid food products with supplemental growth portions of vegetables, fruit, and whole grains while hormones and non-therapeutic antibiotics and reducing salt, added sugars, fats, oils, and red meat Genetic Modification (GMO) of crops, livestock, consumption, and eliminating artificial additives. and livestock feed. — Minimize foods of animal origin (meat, dairy products, Improving equity, affordability, accessibility, and and eggs), as livestock farming is one of the most consumption of high quality culturally relevant Good significant contributors to climate change. Food in all communities is central to our focus on — Exclude fish species identified as most ‘at risk’ by advancing Good Food purchasing practices. the Marine Conservation Society and Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch and give preference to fish derived from sustainable sources. — Purchase lower-grade (less than retail quality) produce for use in prepared dishes to allow more complete use of farm produce, to reduce waste, and to reduce costs. — Minimize bottled water sales and instead serve plain or filtered tap water in reusable jugs or bottles, to minimize transport and packaging waste.
15 Value 1: Local Economies Purchasing Goals
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Local within 200 miles1 (or 10 Southern Local within 200 miles (or 10 Southern Local within 200 miles California counties) AND large scale California counties) AND medium scale (or 10 Southern California operations2 (>500 acre farms); operations; counties) AND small scale or or operations Outside of the local 200 mile range but Outside of the local 200 mile range but within within California AND medium scale California AND small scale operations operations (180-499 acre farms); or Outside of California AND small scale operations (<180 acre farms)
To be recognized as a Good Food purchaser, an institution scores one or higher in the Local Economies Category.
POINTS TARGET AWARDED LEVEL 1 Year 1: 15% annual average of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at 1 — BASELINE least 2% per year will come from Level 1 local food sources (See glossary for definition of source). OR If vendor and/or suppliers do not have current capacity to meet local food purchasing goals, the vendor may submit a plan to achieve full compliance at least at the baseline level by end of year one.
Year 5: 25% annual average of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 1 local 1 food sources by fifth year of participation. LEVEL 2 Year 1: 15% annual average of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at 2 least 2% per year will come from Level 2 local food sources. Year 5: 25% annual average of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 2 local 1 food sources by fifth year of participation.
LEVEL 3 Year 1: 15% annual average of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at 3 least 2% per year will come from Level 3 local food sources.
Year 5: 25% annual average of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 3 local 1 food sources by fifth year of participation. EXTRA Food is purchased from microenterprise farm of less than 100 acres and located within 1 POINTS 200 miles. (Applies to Food is grown/raised and processed in Los Angeles County. 1 annual food purchases) Food is purchased directly from farmer-owned businesses. 1
Food is purchased from women, minority, disabled, or veteran-owned food businesses 1 (farms/operations).
50% of total cost of food purchases comes from small and mid-sized food operations 1 within the local area or region. At least 25% of prepared seafood sourced from small and or local fleets. 1 16 Steps to Implementation: — Source local agricultural and food products directly from farmers and ranchers at certified farmers’ mar- kets in City of Los Angeles and/or Los Angeles County (See Appendix B: Good Food Purchasing Resource Guide – Learn More About Good Food Sourcing: Local Food). — Buy local agricultural and food products from distri- bution firms that verifiably buy from farmers’ market certified producers at Los Angeles County certified farmers’ markets. — Buy local agricultural and food products from distribu- tion firms that buy from other verified local farms and producers. — Buy local agricultural and food products from distribu- tion firms and processors that have a verifiable local food line (See Appendix C for listings). — Work with distributors to source seasonal fruits and vegetables to ensure best taste, quality, and price.
1 The Los Angeles Food Policy Council defines local as 200 miles, ten counties and touching over 22 million people. This ten county region includes: Kern, Ventura, San Diego, Imperial, Riverside, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, San Bernardino, Orange and Los Angeles. 2 To measure the size of other agricultural and food processing operations, see the glossary for full details. Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
17 Value 2: Environmental Sustainability Purchasing Goals
FRUITS & VEGETABLES
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Farms agree to participate in PRiME score indicates low-risk for USDA Organic; Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops; Integrated Pest Management Practices; or or or Biodynamic PRiME score has no high risk Protected Harvest certified; components for Integrated Pest or Management Practices Farms participate in Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops with targets for annual improvement; or Non-GMO Project Verified; or Food Alliance Certified
MILK & DAIRY
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 No antibiotics; Non-GMO Project Verified; Food Alliance Certified; and or or rBGH/rBST free Animal Welfare Approved USDA Organic
MEAT & POULTRY
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Cage-free eggs; AGA Grassfed; Food Alliance Certified; or or or Pasture raised; Non-GMO Project Verified; USDA Organic or or USDA Grassfed; Animal Welfare Approved or No antibiotics3
18 SEAFOOD
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 No seafood purchased listed Fish listed as “Good” and “Best” choices Marine Stewardship Council as “Avoid” in the Monterey Bay in Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood certified; Aquarium’s Seafood Watch Guide Watch Guide or 100% of fish listed as “Best Choice” in Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch Guide
GRAINS
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Pesticide-free Food Alliance Certified; USDA Organic or Non-GMO Project Verified
3 “No antibiotics” refers to sub-therapeutic use in food production. It does not refer to residues on the meat itself.
19 To be recognized as a Good Food purchaser, an institution scores one or higher in the Environmental Sustainability Category.
POINTS TARGET AWARDED
LEVEL 1 YEAR 1 1 — BASELINE 1) 15% annual average of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 1 environmentally sustainable sources. 2) No seafood purchased should be listed as “Avoid” in the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s most recent Seafood Watch Guide. OR If vendor and/or suppliers do not have current capacity to meet environmentally sustainable food purchasing goals, the vendor may submit a plan to achieve full compliance at least at the baseline level by end of year one. YEAR 5 1 1) 25% annual average of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 1 environmentally sustainable sources by fifth year of participation in the GFPP program. 2) No seafood purchased should be listed as “Avoid” in the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s most recent Seafood Watch Guide. LEVEL 2 YEAR 1 2 1) 15% annual average of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 2 environmentally sustainable sources. 2) No seafood purchased should be listed as “Avoid” in the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s most recent Seafood Watch Guide. YEAR 5 1 1) 25% annual average of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 2 environmentally sustainable sources by fifth year of participation. 2) No seafood purchased should be listed as “Avoid” in the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s most recent Seafood Watch Guide. LEVEL 3 YEAR 1 3 1) 15% annual average of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 3 environmentally sustainable sources. 2) No seafood purchased should be listed as “Avoid” in the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s most recent Seafood Watch Guide. YEAR 5 1 1) 25% annual average of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 3 environmentally sustainable sources by fifth year of participation. 2) No seafood purchased should be listed as “Avoid” in the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s most recent Seafood Watch Guide. EXTRA Institution participates in “Meatless Mondays” campaign. 1 POINTS A minimum of 75% percent of all seafood is noted as “Best Choices” in the Monterey 1 (Applies to Bay Aquarium Guide or is certified by the Marine Stewardship Council. annual food purchases) 50% annual average of total cost of food purchases comes from environmentally 1 sustainable sources.
20 Steps to Implementation: — Request that your distributor buy food and beverage products that are third-party certified (See Appendix B: Good Food Purchasing Resource Guide – Learn More About Good Food Sourcing: Environmentally Sustainable Food). — Ask your distributor to encourage suppliers to participate in the Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops to begin measuring their baseline sustainability indicators and develop targets for continued progress (See Appendix B: Good Food Purchasing Resource Guide – Learn More About Good Food Sourcing: Environmentally Sustainable Food). — Request that your distributors buy and sell seafood that is listed in the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch Guide as “Best Choices” or is certified by the Marine Stewardship Council (See Appendix B: Good Food Purchasing Resource Guide – Learn More About Good Food Sourcing: Sustainable Seafood). Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
21 Value 3: Valued Workforce Purchasing Goals
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 — Distributor has policy to respect the — Meets the Level 1 baseline — Meets the Level 1 baseline freedom of association of farmers, requirements; requirements; ranchers, and fisherfolk; and and and Vendor and Supplier* Vendor and Supplier* — All vendors and suppliers*: sign — Have a social responsibility policy, — Have a union contract with their in writing that they comply with which includes: employees; domestic labor law (including state (1) union or non-poverty wages; or and local) in countries where they (2) respect for freedom of association — Are a worker-owned Cooperative; produce goods and services, as and collective bargaining; or well as the core standards of the (3) safe and healthy working — Have signed the CIW Fair Food International Labour Organization conditions; Supplier Code of Conduct; (ILO): and or (4) prohibition of child labor, except — Are Food Justice-Certified by the 1. Freedom of association and the as allowed by domestic law and at Agricultural Justice Project; right to collective bargaining. least one additional employment or 2. Elimination of all forms of forced benefit such as: — Are certified by the Equitable Food or compulsory labor. (5) health care benefits Initiative 3. Abolition of child labor. (6) paid sick days; 4. Elimination of discrimination (7) profit-sharing with all employees; with respect to employment or or occupation — Are Fair Trade Certified (for international products)
* Scope of vendors and suppliers: Fresh Produce: Farm AND distributor (if not purchasing directly from the farm) Minimally processed fresh produce: Production source (e.g. farm, fishery, ranch) AND processing facility AND distributor (these may all be separate entities or may be combined, depending upon the product) Animal Products: Production source (e.g. farm, fishery, ranch) AND slaughtering/processing facility AND distributor (these may all be separate entities or may be combined, depending upon the product) Processed Foods: Processing/Manufacturing Plant AND distributor (if not purchasing directly from the processing/manufacturing plant) Photo credit: Scott Robertson
22 To be recognized as a Good Food purchaser, an institution scores one or higher in the Valued Workforce Category.
POINTS TARGET AWARDED
LEVEL 1 Year 1: All vendors and suppliers sign in writing that they respect the freedom of 1 — BASELINE association of farmers, ranchers, and fisherfolk and comply with domestic labor law (including state and local) in countries where they produce goods and services, as well as the core ILO standards. OR If vendor and/or suppliers do not have current capacity to meet fair food purchasing goals, the vendor may submit a plan to achieve full compliance at least at the baseline level by end of Year 1. Year 5: All vendors and suppliers sign in writing that they respect the freedom of 1 association of farmers, ranchers, and fisherfolk and comply with domestic labor law (including state and local) in countries where they produce goods and services, as well as the core ILO standards. LEVEL 2 Year 1: Institution complies with baseline Level 1 fair criteria AND 5% annual average 2 of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 2 fair sources.
Year 5: Institution complies with baseline Level 1 fair criteria AND 15% annual average 1 of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 2 fair sources by fifth year of participation.
LEVEL 3 Year 1: Institution complies with baseline Level 1 fair criteria AND 5% annual average 3 of total cost of food purchases, with a goal of increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 3 fair sources.
Year 5: Institution complies with baseline Level 1 fair criteria AND 15% annual average 1 of total cost of food purchases will come from Level 3 fair sources by fifth year of participation.
EXTRA Buying entity establishes a reporting system for workers to report violations with a 1 POINTS protection for workers from retaliation. (Applies to Institution complies with baseline Level 1 fair criteria AND 25% of annual average of 1 annual food total cost of food purchases comes from Level 2 or 3 fair sources. purchases)
Steps to Implementation: — Ask your distributor to develop long-term relationships with its suppliers and pay fair prices – review the Agricul- — Ask that your distributor source agricultural products, tural Justice Project’s standards section on Food Business which come from farms and food processors with union Responsibilities to Farmers.5 contracts or certified by one of the programs in the Level
3 Valued Workforce category (See Appendix B: Good Food 4 http://www.agriculturaljusticeproject.org/full_farmer_ Purchasing Resource Guide – Learn More About Good toolkit.pdf Food Sourcing: Valued Workforce). 5 http://www.agriculturaljusticeproject.org/AJP_stnds_ — Ask your distributor to encourage suppliers to review the sect_1.pdf Agricultural Justice Project’s toolkit and a list of resources to help farmers and food businesses to adjust their labor policies, develop documentation, and learn how to develop a social responsibility policy.4
23
Value 4: Animal Welfare Purchasing Goals
MILK & DAIRY
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
Produced from Pastured Cows; American Humane Certified Animal Welfare Approved; or or USDA Organic Humane Farm Animal Care/Certified Humane Raised and Handled®
MEAT & POULTRY
LEVEL 1 — BASELINE LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
Step 1 of Global Animal Partnership Step 2 of Global Animal Partnership Step 3 or higher of 5-Step Animal Welfare Rating 5-Step Animal Welfare Rating Global Animal Partnership standards; standards; 5-Step Animal Welfare Rating or or standards; USDA Organic; American Humane Certified or or Animal Welfare Approved; Cage-free eggs; or or Humane Farm Animal Care/Certified Pastured Humane Raised and Handled® Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
24
To be recognized as a Good Food purchaser, an institution scores one or higher in the Animal Welfare Category.6
POINTS YEAR 1 TARGET AWARDED
LEVEL 1 Year 1: 1 — BASELINE 1) 15% annual average of total cost of milk and dairy products and animal protein product purchases, increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 1 humane sources. 2) 100% of all eggs are cage-free. OR If vendor and/or suppliers do not have current capacity to meet animal welfare purchasing goals, the vendor may submit a plan to achieve full compliance at least at baseline level by end of year one. Year 5: 1 1) 25% annual average of total cost of milk and dairy products, and animal protein product purchases will come from Level 1 humane sources by fifth year of participation. 2) 100% of all eggs are cage-free. LEVEL 2 Year 1: 2 1) 15% annual average of total cost of milk and dairy products and animal protein products, increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 2 humane sources. 2) 100% of all eggs are cage-free. Year 5: 1 1) 25% annual average of total cost of milk and dairy products, and animal protein product purchases will come from Level 2 humane sources by fifth year of participation. 2) 100% of all eggs are cage-free. LEVEL 3 Year 1: 3 1) 15% annual average of total cost of milk and dairy products, and animal protein product purchases, increasing at least 2% per year will come from Level 3 humane sources. 2) 100% of all eggs are cage-free. Year 5: 1 1) 25% annual average of total cost of milk and dairy products, and animal protein product purchases will come from Level 3 humane sources by fifth year of participation. 2) 100% of all eggs are cage-free. EXTRA Institution encourages plant based diets by offering 100% vegetarian and/or vegan 1 POINTS options. (Applies to 50% annual average of total cost of milk and dairy products, and animal protein 1 annual food products purchases come from humane sources. purchases)
Steps to Implementation: 6 — Request that your distributor buy and sell animal protein If only plant-based food options are offered and thus products that carry a third-party certification such as, no milk and dairy products, eggs, and animal protein Global Animal Partnership, produced from AGA Grass- products are purchased, institution receives full (3) Fed cows, Humane Farm Animal Care/Certified Humane points. Raised and Handled®, and Animal Welfare Approved (See Appendix B: Good Food Purchasing Resource Guide – Learn More About Good Food Sourcing: Animal Welfare).
25
Value 5: Nutrition Goals
To be recognized as a Good Food purchaser, an institution meets at least 13 out of 25 items in the Nutrition Category7
POINTS YEAR 1 TARGET AWARDED
Fruits, vegetables, and whole grains account for at least 25% of total food purchases 1
Seasonal fruits and vegetables are sourced to ensure best taste, quality, and price 1
To the greatest extent possible, purchase whole fruits, without added sugar. When whole and unprocessed 1 fruit cannot be purchased, due to cost or availability, purchase frozen fruit. If frozen products are unavail- able, fruit should be canned in its own juice with no sugars added
To the greatest extent possible, purchase whole vegetables, without added sodium and fat. When whole 1 and unprocessed vegetables cannot be purchased due to cost or availability, purchase frozen vegetables. If frozen products are unavailable, canned vegetables should be low sodium (per FDA definitions)8 or have “no salt added”
Prioritize the purchase of whole-grain, high-fiber options 9 1 Prioritize offering plant-based main dishes at each meal service10 1 If meat is offered, prioritize the purchase of “extra lean” (total fat ≤ 5%) and “lean” (total fat ≤ 10%) meat 1 such as skinless chicken, turkey, ground beef, and pork If meat is offered, minimize the purchase of processed meats11 1 If dairy products are offered, prioritize the purchase of Fat-Free or Low Fat dairy products (1% milk fat or less 1 with no added sweeteners). If milk is offered, soy, rice, or other non-dairy milk alternatives without added sweeteners are available Prioritize all juice purchased to be 100% fruit juice with no added sweeteners and vegetable juice that is Low 1 Sodium as per FDA definitions12 At least 50% of available beverage choices (excluding 100% fruit and Low Sodium vegetable juices and Fat 1 Free or Low Fat milk with no added sweeteners) must contain ≤ 25 calories per 8 ounces Require drinking water (preferably cold tap water in at least 12 ounce cup sizes) to be offered 1
Eliminate the use of hydrogenated and partially hydrogenated oils for cooking and baking 1
Offer Low Fat and/or Low Calorie and/or Low Sodium condiments as per FDA definitions13 1 Commit to developing and implementing a gradual sodium reduction plan that meets current Dietary 1 Guidelines for Americans (DGA) standards All pre-packaged food has zero grams trans fat per serving (as labeled) 1 Eliminate the use of deep frying 1 Prioritize the preparation of all protein, including fish, poultry, meat, or meat alternatives in a low fat way 1 (broiling, grilling, baking, poaching, roasting, or steaming) Display water, diet drinks (do not exceed 25 cal. per 8oz), 100% fruit juice without added sweeteners, Low Sodium vegetable juices, Fat Free or Low Fat dairy products with no added sweeteners, and milk alternative 1 products in eye level sections of beverage cases (if applicable) Prioritize the location of fruit and/or non-fried vegetables at convenient, high-visibility locations (including 1 at front of cafeteria lines) and within reach of checkout registers (if applicable)
26
Highlight fruit with no-added sweeteners and non-fried vegetable offerings with signage 1 Remove candy bars, cookies, chips and beverages with added sugars (such as soda, sports and energy 1 drinks) from checkout register areas/point-of-purchase (if applicable) Menu lists the nutritional information for each item using the federal menu labeling requirements under the 1 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 as a guide Prioritize portion control strategies, if applicable (e.g. utilizing 10’ or smaller plates for all meals or make available reduced-size portions of at least 25% of menu items offered, and offer reduced-size portions at a 1 lower price than regular-sized portions)14 Develop a worksite wellness program including nutrition education for employees and/or patrons 1
LEVEL 1 HEALTHY – MEETS 13 – 15 OUT OF 25 LEVEL 2 HEALTHY – MEETS 16 – 20 OUT OF 25 LEVEL 3 HEALTHY – MEETS 21 – 25 OUT OF 25 EXTRA POINTS HEALTHY – MEETS ALL 25 POINTS (1 POINT)
7 All nutrition goals listed above may not apply 9 Whole grain is listed as the first or second to all types of food service institutions. Food ingredient; 2 grams or more of fiber/serving service institutions must ensure the above nutrition 10 Recommend plant-based dishes to include fruits, goals comply with local, state and federal law that vegetable, beans, and legumes may govern individual food service programs such as 11 If processed meats are offered, recommend using youth detention facilities, school meal programs and only products with no more than 480 mg per 2 oz. other meals served to dependent community members. 12 Low Sodium is 140 mg or less per RACC Each food service institution will be eligible for 13 Low-Fat is 3 g or less per RACC (and per 50g if points towards the good food pledge based on the RACC is small); Low Sodium is 140 mg or less per total potential applicable points for that type RACC (and per 50g if RACC is small); Low Calorie is of food service venue. LAFPC will work with each 40 calories or less per RACC (and per 50g if RACC institution individually on their institution’s is small). pledge criteria. These nutrition goals were 14 Reduced-sized portions are no more than 70% of the developed from reputable sources including the weight, measured in grams, of a regular-size portion United States Department of Agriculture, the Food of the same menu item. and Drug Administration, as well as other leading health organizations. The above nutrition goals will be reviewed and revised periodically to ensure they meet current dietary recommendations and take into consideration program implementation. 8 Low sodium is defined as 140 mg or less per Reference Amount Customarily Consumed (RACC) Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
27
ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRACEABILITY Sound Good Food bids could include the following An institution’s Good Food purchases are generally limited by accountability and traceability requirements for any produce their produce and distribution firms because of their access or distribution firm: to products carrying food safety approval. Compliance and/or meeting procurement objectives also fall to the produce and — The name and location of farms and processing facilities food distributors. Therefore bids and contracts should have providing Good Food to an institution will be provided clauses for ascertaining product traceability, identification, to the institution at the time of ordering, a week or two record keeping, and reporting. These clauses may already be prior to ordering or on the product list of available food accommodated in current Hazard Analysis & Critical Control items. Typically, the produce lists of available products Points (HACCP) and other third-party action plans. from distributors and produce houses are the way buyers are notified to select the food they want to purchase. The Purchaser should develop a customized program in Vendors should list how each Good Food supplier fulfills partnership with their distributor and/or produce house and verifies identified Good Food goals, including local, to accomplish all of the traceability necessary for each environmentally sustainable, fair, animal welfare purchaser’s specific needs around Good Food purchases. and healthy. — If an existing vendor is unable to comply with specific targets within the overall Good Food framework, the vendor will be asked to submit a plan outlining a strategy with benchmarks to achieve full compliance within one year and update the plan annually during term of contract. Vendors will verify their progress and compliance with the plan during specified benchmark periods. — The vendor will provide the net price paid to farmers, ranchers, or fisherfolk to the Purchasing Institution on a per pound, per case, or other applicable case count prior to the distributor’s or produce firm’s mark up. Costs should be fair, reasonable and transparent. The Purchaser should develop this transparent program in partnership with their Distributor and/or Produce House. — Paperwork that proves the origin of any processed food items will be provided to an institution upon request, but shall be kept on record by produce or distribution firms. We recommend the development and implementation of a transparent record keeping system between purchasers and fresh produce processors so that there are checks and balances in place in order to confirm that Good Food products remain intact throughout the processing chain Photo credit: M. Jill Overdorf
28
EDUCATION AND MARKETING FINAL THOUGHTS
Marketing and education of Good Food are critical to Food is only one facet of creating a Good Food community. building buy-in and support from employees, consumers, and Advocacy for Good Food venues involve several other other customers. components: — Educational outreach both to staff and the surrounding Educate and engage – Suppliers and their employees along community; the supply chain from farm to cafeteria need to be informed, — Use of reusable and environmentally preferred non- educated, and encouraged to be active participants in reusable food service ware items and minimizing waste creating a successful Good Food Purchasing Program. by adopting the waste hierarchy of reduce, reuse, and Successful implementation of these programs in food service recycle ; settings depends on empowered food service workers in — Reducing energy use by installing energy-efficient the kitchens and knowledgeable employees, students, or equipment and making sure it is properly maintained and customers visiting the food service venue. up-to-date; Communicate good work, helping to encourage growth in — Supporting local farms, farmers’ markets, and community both the demand for and the supply of Good Food. Be a supported agriculture; willing educator of patrons and colleagues. — Food donation and waste reduction; — Alignment of food vendor options with the facility’s healthy, sustainable food program; and — Responsible employer policies related to wages, benefits, and promotions for food service employees.
While this document focused on Good Food purchasing, we are happy to provide additional resources on other aspects of Good Food business implementation.
29 Photo credit: M. Jill Overdorf
30
APPENDIX A: Glossary of Terms
Food Justice-Certified: a domestic fair trade label by the Biodynamic: a farming method that encourages the use of Agricultural Justice Project that certifies fair prices and terms preparations made from fermented manure, minerals and for farmers and at the same time fair working conditions herbs are used to help restore and harmonize the vital life for all employees in certified operations. The standards are forces of the farm and to enhance the nutrition, quality and rights-based, such as the right to freely negotiate the terms flavor of the food being raised. Biodynamic practitioners also of employment and freedom of association, and a verification recognize and strive to work in cooperation with the subtle model that ensures a safe space is created in which workers influences of the wider cosmos on soil, plant and animal can exercise those rights. Other key provisions of the program health. Source/Website: https://www.biodynamics.com/ include strong health and safety protections, including a biodynamics.html preference for organic production and strong restrictions on Cage Free: This label indicates that the flock was able to the use of occupational toxins when a farm is not organic; freely roam a building, room, or enclosed area with unlimited clear grievance and complaints procedures including the access to food and fresh water during their production cycle. right to appeal; and standards covering living wages, housing Beak cutting is permitted. There is no third-party auditing. conditions, and more. Source: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA; Humane Society Source: http://www.foodfirst.org/en/node/3098 Website: www.agriculturaljusticeproject.org/ standards.html Certified Humane Raised & Handled: A consumer certification and labeling program which indicates that egg, dairy, American Humane Certified: a voluntary, third-party animal meat or poultry products have been produced with the welfare audit process based on five freedoms: welfare of the farm animal in mind. Farm animal treatment — Freedom from thirst and hunger – by ready access to fresh standards include: Allow animals to engage in their natural water and a diet to maintain full health and vigor behaviors; Raise animals with sufficient space, shelter and — Freedom from discomfort – by providing an appropriate gentle handling to limit stress; Make sure they have ample environment including shelter and a comfortable fresh water and a healthy diet without added antibiotics or resting area hormones. Producers also must comply with local, state — Freedom from pain, injury and disease – by prevention or and federal environmental standards. Processors must rapid diagnosis and treatment comply with the American Meat Institute Standards, a higher — Freedom to express normal behavior – by providing standard for slaughtering farm animals than the Federal sufficient space, proper facilities and company of the Humane Slaughter Act. www.certifiedhumane.com animal’s own kind — Freedom from fear and distress – by ensuring conditions Certified Organic: Products must meet the federal organic and treatment which avoid mental suffering standards as determined by a USDA approved certifying Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/028552_humane_ agency. Organic foods cannot be grown using synthetic animals.html#ixzz27nxDdi1t fertilizers, chemicals, or sewage sludge; cannot be genetically Website: http://www.humaneheartland.org/our- modified; and cannot be irradiated. Organic meat and standards poultry must be fed only organically grown feed (without any Animal Welfare Approved: A consumer certification and animal byproducts) and cannot be treated with hormones labeling program which indicates that egg, dairy, meat or or antibiotics. In order to bear the USDA “Certified Organic” poultry products have been produced with the welfare of seal, a product must contain 95 to 100 percent organic the farm animal in mind. The animals have access to the ingredients. Products that contain more than 70 percent, outdoors and are able to engage in natural behavior. No cages but less than 94 percent organic ingredients can be labeled or crates may be used to confine the animals, and growth “Made with Organic Ingredients,” but cannot use the USDA hormones and subtherapeutic antibiotics are disallowed. “Certified Organic” seal. Organic ingredients can be listed Some surgical mutilations, such as beak-mutilation of egg- on the packaging of products that are not entirely organic. laying hens, are prohibited, while others, such as castration http://www.ams.usda.gov/NOP/indexNet.htm. While without painkiller, are permitted. Compliance is verified some small farmers grow their food using organic methods, through third-party auditing. they choose not to go through the certification process for economic or ideological reasons, so they cannot label their food “certified organic.”
31
CIW Fair Food Supplier Code of Conduct: a set of labor Fair Trade: A certified label that guarantees that farmers and standards developed by the Coalition for Immokalee Workers their workers receive a living wage and a fair price for their designed to improve working conditions and give workers the labor and their product, and that the product is produced in ability to voice their concerns over safety, working conditions, an ecologically sound manner. and Code violations without fear of retribution. Growers are required to keep a proper time registration system, hire farm Foodshed: Like a watershed (where the idea of the foodshed workers as employees and pay them wages and benefits takes its inspiration), a foodshed measures the reach of the directly, provide protective equipment and training, ensure local landscape in terms of its food production capacities. breaks and opportunities for advancement, and implement A foodshed’s size is determined by its “structures of supply,” proper workplace safety systems. the regional, economic, political, and transportation systems Source: http://fairfoodstandards.org/code.html that determine how food gets from farm to table. The Los Angeles Urban Rural Roundtable, convened by the Roots of Cooperative: An autonomous association of persons united Change in 2010, defined the Los Angeles foodshed as the voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and two hundred mile radius around the Los Angeles urban core, cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly owned and from which the region draws much of its food to feed the local democratically controlled enterprise. population. This concept continues to evolve. As a starting point, we refer to the 200-mile threshold as the Los Angeles Conventionally Grown: Food grown using chemical fertilizers, regional foodshed. pesticides, and herbicides. In most situations, default options are conventionally grown. Food Alliance Certified: Organization that certifies producers based on healthy and humane animal treatment with no Equitable Food Initiative Certified: a program that certifies added growth promotants or sub-therapeutic antibiotics, soil standards for working conditions, pesticide use and food and water conservation, integrated pest, disease and weed safety. EFI’s labor standards protect farm workers’ health and management, pesticide risk reduction, wildlife habitat and safety; guarantee their freedom of association; provide fair biodiversity conservation, safe and fair working conditions. compensation and conditions of employment; ensure non- Website: http://foodalliance.org/certification discrimination and non-retaliation; create dispute settlement mechanisms; address housing conditions; establish a social Free Range: A USDA-certified label that guarantees that premium; and cover workers on temporary visas. EFI’s food animals (usually poultry) had room to move around and safety standards address risks arising from land and water “access to the outdoors.” These standards apply to poultry use, soil amendments, animal waste, and post-harvest bred for eating only, not to hens that produce eggs. It does packaging and transportation. Environmental standards focus not guarantee that the animals ever went outside or that the on the safe management of pests, soil, water and habitat. outdoor space provided was good pasture. Website: http://www.equitablefood.net Good Food: Good Food is defined by the Los Angeles Food Family Farm: A farm managed by a family or individual who Policy Council as food that is: 1) Healthy: a) Foods meet the owns the animals or land, receives a good portion of their Dietary Guidelines for Americans and provide freedom from livelihood from the farm, and participates in the daily labor chronic ailment; b) Food is delicious, safe, and aesthetically to work and manage the farm. The USDA also defines a small pleasing.; 2. Affordable: Foods that people of all income levels family farm as having less than $250,000 gross receipts annually. can purchase.; 3. Fair: a) All participants in the food supply Source: http://www.nifa.usda.gov/nea/ag_systems/ chain receive fair compensation and fair treatment, free of in_focus/familyfarm_if_overview.html exploitation.; b) High quality food is equitable and physically and culturally accessible to all; 4) Sustainable: Produced, Fair: All participants in the food supply chain receive fair processed, distributed, and recycled locally using the compensation and fair treatment, free of exploitation. principles of environmental stewardship (in terms of water, soil, and pesticide management).
32
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): In the context of Healthy: Foods meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans food, GMOS are agricultural products (crops or animals) that and provide freedom from chronic ailment. Food is delicious, have been genetically engineered to possess certain traits. safe, and aesthetically pleasing. Since there is minimal research on the long-term impacts that GMOs may have on the earth and human health, many Hormone Free: Milk that comes from cows who have not organizations caution against use and consumption of been treated with rBST, also known as rBGH or bovine GMOs. Organic products are, by definition, non-GMO. growth hormone.
Global Animal Partnership 5-Step Animal Welfare Rating Integrated Pest Management (IPM): IPM growers practice a standards: a tiered standards program that encourages higher variety of techniques: they apply natural substances like kelp, welfare practices and systems to the benefit of farmers, rock powders, and compost to keep crops disease resistant. consumers, retailers, and the animals. Step 1 prohibits cages They monitor trees and set traps to capture insects. Ideally, and crates. Step 2 requires environmental enrichment for IPM growers use pesticides only as a last resort, when pest indoor production systems; Step 3, outdoor access; Step 4, damage would keep them from bringing in a profitable crop. pasture-based production; Step 5, an animal-centered approach with all physical alterations prohibited; and, finally, Step 5+, the Large Scale Operation (LSO): Large scale operations include entire life of the animal spent on an integrated farm. all levels of the food supply chain. The size is defined by type Website: http://www.globalanimalpartnership.org/ of operation: the-5-step-program/ — LSO Farm — a farm larger than 499 acres (NOTE: LSO Farm, as defined by the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines, Grassfed (American Grassfed Association (AGA) Certified): is based upon the classification of farms by acreage in the This label ensures that animals have continuous access to 2007 USDA Agricultural Census). pasture during the growing season (as opposed to being — LSO Food Business — A business (including food confined or eating grass out of a trough) and cannot be fed processors) whose three (3) year average annual gross grain or grain products, which can diminish the nutritive revenues exceed $7 million (NOTE: Size of non-farm benefits of grass feeding. food business definition is based on City of Los Angeles Business Inclusion Program). Grassfed (USDA Certified): Meat products derived from ruminant animals, e.g. beef cattle, dairy cattle, and lamb, Living Wage: A wage that allows workers to meet their and may be approved to carry the USDA “grass-fed” label claim if their families’ basic needs, including housing, food, childcare, the animal was fed a diet of grass and/or forage throughout transportation, healthcare, clothing, and recreation costs for it’s lifetime, with the exception of milk consumed prior to the area in which they live. weaning. Animals cannot be fed grain or grain by-products and must have continuous access to pasture during the Local: The term “local” will vary depending on your location growing season (last frost in spring to first frost in fall). Use and what is available to you. The Los Angeles Food Policy of hormones or antibiotics is not addressed. Council has defined Los Angeles County’s foodshed to span 200 miles, ten counties and touch over 22 million people. Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points (HACCP): HACCP This ten county region includes: Kern, Ventura, San Diego, is a management system in which food safety is addressed Imperial, Riverside, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, San through the analysis and control of biological, chemical, Bernardino, Orange, and Los Angeles. The term “local” will and physical hazards from raw material production, vary depending on your location and what is available to you. procurement and handling, to manufacturing, distribution and consumption of the finished product. Los Angeles Business Inclusion Program Definitions: Source: http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/ — Small Business Enterprise (SBE): For the purpose of hazardanalysiscriticalcontrolpointshaccp/default. htm The Business Inclusion Program, Small Business Enterprise shall mean a business enterprise that meets the following criteria:
33
— A business (personal or professional services, — MSO Food Business — a business (including food manufacturer, supplier, and vendor) whose three processors) whose three (3) year average annual gross (3) year average annual gross revenues does not revenues fall between $3.5 million and $7 million. (NOTE: exceed $7 million. Size of non-farm food business definition is based on City — A business (construction contractors) whose of Los Angeles Business Inclusion Program). three (3) year average annual gross revenues does not exceed $14 million. Non-GMO Project Verified: is a verification program that — Emerging Business Enterprise (EBE): For the purpose of seeks to assist farmers, processors and manufacturers in this program, Emerging Business Enterprise shall mean a avoiding the contamination of GMO’s by progressively business enterprise whose three (3) year average annual reducing the risk of GMO contamination. The Project requires gross revenues do not exceed $3.5 million. practices and processes for controlling GMO contamination Source: http://gsd.lacity.org/sms/BIP%20OUTREACH%20 by these at-risk inputs and ingredients. Methods such DOCUMENTATION%20&%20PROCESS.pdf) as segregation, traceability, risk assessment, sampling techniques, and quality control management are emphasized. Marine Stewardship Council certified: an independent, non- Website: http://www.nongmoproject.org/ profit organization that sets standards for sustainable fishing based on three principles: Organic: Food grown without the use of chemical pesticides, — The fishing activity must be at a level which is sustainable herbicides, or fertilizers. Animals must be fed organic feed for the fish population. Any certified fishery must operate and cannot be given antibiotics or growth hormones. Organic so that fishing can continue indefinitely and is not foods may not be genetically modified or irradiated or contain overexploiting the resources. artificial preservatives or additives. Organic meats must come — Fishing operations should be managed to maintain from animals that are “free range.” the structure, productivity, function and diversity of the ecosystem on which the fishery depends. PRiME (Pesticide Risk Mitigation Engine) score: an online — The fishery must meet all local, national and international tool that ranks pesticide products for impacts on birds, laws and must have a management system in place earthworms, small mammals, aquatic ecosystems and to respond to changing circumstances and maintain worker/bystander health and safety. This tool applies best sustainability. available science to permit producers, advisors and regulatory Website: http://www.msc.org/ professionals to compare different pest management Meatless Mondays campaign: non-profit initiative of The scenarios for any commodity and select options with the Monday Campaigns, in association with the Johns Hopkins’ fewest potential environmental and health hazards. Risk Bloomberg School of Public Health that encourages people, is presented on a low/moderate/high scale. Risk index groups and organizations to not eat meat on Mondays scores below a 10% chance of an undesirable effect to be to improve their health and the health of the planet. The in the low risk category, where no further risk mitigation is campaign provides information and vegetarian recipes ideas needed. Realistically, 10% is within the margin of error for based on USDA nutritional guidelines on their website. our risk models. Risk index scores between 10% and 50% fall into the moderate risk category where risk mitigation is Website: http://www.meatlessmonday.com/ recommended. Risk index scores above a 50% chance of an undesirable effect fall into the high-risk category. Medium Scale Operation (MSO): Medium scale operations Website: http://ipmprime.org include all levels of the food supply chain. The size is defined by type of operation: Procurement: The sourcing and purchasing of food to supply — MSO Farm — a farm between 180 and 499 acres (NOTE: foodservice operations. Procurement involves identifying MSO Farm, as defined by the Good Food Purchasing the food needs of the customer base for the foodservice Guidelines, is based upon the classification of farms by operation, specifying product requirements, identifying acreage in the 2007 USDA Agricultural Census). suppliers, taking deliveries, inspecting and storing items, and, depending on the size of the operation, soliciting and evaluating bids and proposals, controlling inventory, and paying suppliers.
34
Protected Harvest certified: a points-based certification — SSO Food Business — a business enterprise (including program is designed to ensure that crops have been raised food processors) whose three (3) year average annual with integrated pest management. The point system is used gross revenues do not exceed $3.5 million. that rewards growers for implementing ecologically based practices in nine different management categories: field (NOTE: Size of non-farm food business definition is based scouting, information sources, pest management decisions, on City of Los Angeles Business Inclusion Program). field management decisions, weed management, insect management, disease management, soil and water quality, Source: A source includes not only the food supplier that and storage management. A minimum number of points the purchaser does business with directly, but also all prior must be achieved in each category to qualify for certification. links in the supply, processing and production chain, starting Website: http://www.protectedharvest.org/ with the farm. The supplier who is working directly with the purchaser will take good faith measures to ensure that, to the “Raised without antibiotics” or “No antibiotics administered” best of the supplier’s knowledge, the supplier’s sources also (poultry and meat products): These USDA approved label comply with the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines. claims imply that no antibiotics were administered to the animal at any point during its life. If an animal becomes sick Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops: a multi-stakeholder and requires treatment, it should be segregated from other initiative to develop a system for measuring sustainable animals and sold as a conventional meat product. performance throughout the specialty crop supply chain. Source: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Fact_Sheets/ The Index does not provide standards, but instead provides Meat_&_Poultry_Labeling_Terms/index.asp a yardstick for measuring sustainable outcomes by offering a suite of outcomes-based metrics to enable operators at Raised without added hormones or “No hormones added” any point along the supply chain to benchmark, compare, (beef and lamb only): This USDA approved label claim implies and communicate their own performance. The four key that no added hormones were given to the animal at any environmental indicators in the latest version are soil health point during its life. Most meaningful when used on beef or and the use of nutrients, energy and water. lamb products since the use of added hormones is prohibited Website: http://www.stewardshipindex.org/ in poultry and pork production. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Fact_Sheets/Meat_&_ Poultry_Labeling_Terms/index.asp Sustainable: Systems and practices that can be continued indefinitely into the foreseeable future without reliance upon rBGH-free or rBST-free (dairy): Recombinant Bovine Growth ongoing depletion of non-renewable resources (e.g., soil, Hormone is a genetically engineered artificial hormone, which energy, biological diversity) or widening social inequities is injected into cows to increase milk production. Labeling is (within and across communities, countries, or generations). voluntary. With respect to agriculture, the term can include, but is http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/take-action/ not limited to or synonymous with, certified organic consumer-tools/the-milk-tip/ production practices.
Small Scale Operation (SSO): Small scale operations include Sustainable Seafood: Seafood that comes from sources, either all levels of the food supply chain. The size is defined by type farmed or wild, that can maintain production indefinitely of operation: without affecting the integrity of the surrounding ecosystem. — SSO Farm — a farm smaller than 180 acres. (NOTE: SSO Farm, as defined by the Good Food Purchasing Guidelines, Transitional Organic: This label has been used in the past is based upon the classification of farms by acreage in the to mean that a farmer is using organic methods but has 2007 USDA Agricultural Census. This is in contrast to the not reached the three-year pesticide-free requirement and USDA definition of “small farm,” which is classified by cannot yet use the Certified Organic label. The USDA does gross sales less than $250,000.) not currently allow or sanction the use of this label for official marketing purposes.
35
USDA Farm Classification System The USDA Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) has developed a farm classification system to divide U.S. farms into eight mutually exclusive and more homogeneous groups. The farm typology focuses on “family farms,” or farms organized as proprietorships, partnerships, and family corporations that are not operated by a hired manager. To be complete, however, it also includes nonfamily farms. For more info, see http://www.extension.org/pages/13823/usda- small-farm-definitions
Value Chain: The Wallace Center differentiates food value chains from traditional supply food supply chains in the following way: New food value chains - 1) Operate as a series of win-win strategic partnerships rather than win-lose, interchangeable business deals; and 2) Differentiate products by attributes that traditional supply chains do not typically monitor or promote, such as the environmental and social benefits behind a particular producer’s practices. Source: http://www.wallacecenter.org/our-work/ Resource-Library/Innovative-Models/NGFN%20Case%20 Study_Syscos%20Journey%20From%20Supply%20Chain%20 to%20Value%20Chain.pdf
36 APPENDIX B: Good Food Purchasing Resource Guide
HEALTHY, LOCAL & SUSTAINABLE FOOD Universities PURCHASING POLICIES & GUIDELINES University of California Policy on Sustainable Practices: Sustainable Foodservices Policy (page 19) http://www. universityofcalifornia.edu/sustainability/ Restaurants documents/policy_sustain_prac.pdf Green Seal™: GS 46 Restaurants & Food Service http://www.greenseal.org/GreenBusiness/Standards. aspx?vid=ViewStandardDetail&cid=0&sid=27 Yale Sustainable Food Purchasing Guide http://www.yale. edu/sustainablefood/purchasing_guide_002.pdf.pdf
SustainWeb: Ethical Eats (UK based restaurants and caterers Yale Sustainable Food Purchasing Guidelines committed to sourcing sustainable foods) http://www.yale.edu/sustainablefood/food_ http://www.sustainweb.org/ethicaleats/ purchasing.html Emory University’s Sustainable Food Initiative Green Restaurant Association’s: Dine Green http://sustainability.emory.edu/page/1008/ http://www.dinegreen.com/restaurants/standards. Sustainable-Food asp Bon Appetit: General Sustainability Principles San Francisco Green Business Program Standards: http://www.cafebonappetit.com/ Restaurants http://sfgreenbusiness.org/images/stories/ K-12 Schools program%20standards%20PDFs/Restaurant_Checklist. Washington D.C: Healthy Schools Act of 2010 pdf http://dchealthyschools.org/wordpress/wp- content/uploads/2011/11/Healthy-Schools-Act-as- Amended-20110810.pdf Hospitals Green Guide for Health Care™ Food Service Credits http://www.noharm.org/us_canada/issues/food/ Local Food Procurement for San Diego Unified School District planning.php#credits http://www.sandi.net/site/Default.aspx?PageID=993
Green Guide for Health Care™ Food Service Credits, Local Fruit and Vegetable Sourcing in St. Paul’s Public “Environmentally Preferable Purchasing: Food Technical Schools- Lessons Learned and http://food-hub.org/files/resources/ Brief” http://noharm.org/lib/downloads/purchasing/EPP_ Food_Tech_Brief_GGHC.pdf Sample Purchasing Guidelines – “Specs” Large Scale Scratch Cooking Environment- Chef Ann Cooper, Berkeley Unified Health Care Without Harm’s Tools and Resources for School District http://www.thelunchbox.org/sites/default/files/ Hospitals, Group Purchasing Organizations and Distributors SAMPLE_PURCHASING_GUIDELINES2.pdf http://www.healthyfoodinhealthcare.org/resources. php#purchasingguides Primer on geographic Preference: Potential, Pitfalls and Healthier Hospitals Initiative Proper Procedures – School Food FOCUS http://healthierhospitals.org/hhi-challenges/ http://www.schoolfoodfocus.org healthier-food Alliance for a Healthier Generation Kaiser Permanente: Fact Sheet on Sustainable Food http://www.healthiergeneration.org/companies. aspx?id=5657 Purchasing Policy http://xnet.kp.org/newscenter/aboutkp/green/stori es/2011/110811sustainablefood.html National Farm to School Network’s list of resources on buying and selling local foods Partnership for a Healthier America http://www.farmtoschool.org/publications. http://www.ahealthieramerica.org/#!/about-the- php?pt=buys partnership
37 Federal, State and Municipal Government LEARN MORE ABOUT GOOD FOOD SOURCING General Services Agency: Health and Sustainability Guidelines for Federal Concessions and Vending Operations Local http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104429 USDA’s List of Certified Farmers’ Markets http://apps.ams.usda.gov/FarmersMarkets/Default. Massachusetts State Agency Food Standards aspx http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dph/com-health/ nutrition-phys-activity/eo509-state-agency-food- standards.pdf See Appendix C for list of local product availability in LA (distributors and processors) City and County of San Francisco, Executive Directive: Healthy and Sustainable Food for San Francisco Environmental Sustainability http://www.sfgov3.org/ftp/ Consumer Reports uploadedfiles/sffood/policy_reports/ MayorNewsomExecutiveDirectiveonHealthySustainable Greener Choices: Eco-Labels Center Food.pdf http://www.greenerchoices.org/eco-labels/ productArea.cfm?ProductCategoryID=174 New York City Agency Food Standards http://www.cspinet.org/new/pdf/nyc_agency_food_ Food Alliance, Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy, standards.pdf Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education, Healthcare Without Harm General Background Resources Third Party Certifiers for Sustainability in Food & Agriculture Sustainable Food Policy- A Guide to Developing Sustainable http://www.sustainablefoodpolicy.org/third-party- certifications-for-identifying-sustainably- Food Purchasing Policy produced-foods http://www.sustainablefoodpolicy.org/
Natural Resources Defense Council Public Health Law and Policy: “Understanding Healthy Label Lookup Procurement: Using Government’s Purchasing Power to http://www.nrdc.org/living/labels/food.asp Increase Access to Healthy Food” http://www.phlpnet.org/sites/phlpnet.org/files/ Understanding_Healthy_Procurement_2011.pdf Meatless Monday Campaign Toolkits http://www.meatlessmonday.com/spread-the- movement/ UC Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education Program, Agricultural Sustainability Institute, UC Davis: “Emerging CCOF Certified Organic Local Food Initiatives in Northern California Hospitals” CCOF’s Organic Online Directory http://www.sarep.ucdavis.edu/CDPP/fti/Farm_To_ http://www.ccof.org/cgi-bin/organicdirectory_ Hospital_WebFinal.pdf search.cgi
The Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future Health Care USDA Certified Organic and Without Harm: “Balanced Menus: A Pilot Evaluation of www.ams.usda.gov/nop/ Implementation in Four San Francisco Bay Area Hospitals” http://www.jhsph.edu/bin/k/m/BMCReportFinal.pdf Food Alliance Certified Online directory of certified producers and handlers Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): http://foodalliance.org/client-search “Improving the Food Environment Through Nutrition Standards: A guide for government procurement” Non-GMO Project Verified http://www.cdc.gov/salt/pdfs/dhdsp_procurement_ http://www.nongmoproject.org/take-action/search- guide.pdf participating-products/
Michigan Good Food Work Group Report Series: Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops “Institutional Food Purchasing” http://www.stewardshipindex.org/ http://mlui.org/downloads/ InstFoodPurchasingReport.pdf
38
Sustainable Seafood Domestic Fair Trade Association Blue Ocean Institute DFTA is engaged in a process of developing criteria for domestic Offers Ocean and seafood sustainability education for chefs fair trade standards. Draft DFTA criteria and instructions for http://www.blueocean.org evaluation: http://www.thedfta.org/index.php?c=evaluation Monterey Bay Seafood Watch List http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/ Food Chain Workers Alliance SeafoodWatch/web/sfw_factsheet.aspx Statement on Social Certification http://foodchainworkers.org/?page_id=232 Good Catch…The Essentials: Helping You Navigate Seafood Restaurant Opportunities Center Sustainability http://www.goodcatch.org.uk/site_media/uploads/ National Diner’s Guide Good_Catch...the_essentials_FINAL.pdf Consumers guide provides information on the wage, benefits, and promotion practices of the 150 most popular restaurants in Marine Stewardship Council America, including several high-road restaurants in Los Angeles. http://www.msc.org/ http://rocunited.org/dinersguide/
Marine Conservation Society Fair World Project http://fairworldproject.org/ Buyers guide to sustainable seafood http://www.fishonline.org/ Animal Welfare Global Animal Partnership The Institute for Fisheries Resources Recognizes and rewards producers for their welfare practices and List of local fish seasonality http://www.ifrfish.org/where/los-angeles-area promotes and facilitates continuous improvement. Standards listed here: Valued Workforce http://www.globalanimalpartnership.org/the-5- step-program/our-standards/ United Farm Workers List of farms with union contracts: Animal Welfare Approved http://www.ufw.org/_page. php?menu=organizing&inc=orga_label.html Online directory of certified farms http://www.animalwelfareapproved.org/product- search/ Agricultural Justice Project’s Standards http://www.agriculturaljusticeproject.org/ AJPStandardsJuly2010Final.pdf Humane Farm Animal Care/Certified Humane Raised and Handled® Agricultural Justice Project’ s Toolkit for Farmers Online directory Sample labor policies and other resources to help farmers meet http://www.certifiedhumane.org/index. php?page=where-to-buy standards http://www.agriculturaljusticeproject.org/full_ farmer_toolkit.pdf AGA Grass-Fed AGA Producer Profiles Equitable Food Initiative http://www.americangrassfed.org/producer- profiles/ Partnership among businesses and organizations that have come together to develop standards, training processes and a Animal Welfare Approved certification to protect farm workers and produce safer, healthier Food Labeling for Dummies food. A guide to common food label terms and claims http://www.equitablefood.net/#!home/mainPage http://www.animalwelfareapproved.org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/08/Food-Labelling-for-Dummies-6_ Bon Appetit: Code of Conduct for Sustainable Tomato high-res.pdf Suppliers http://www.bamco.com/uploads/documents/ CODE%20OF%20CONDUCT%20FOR%20SUSTAINABLE%20 TOMATO%20SUPPLIERS%20.pdf
39
Nutrition U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA): Dietary Guidelines for Americans http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/DGAs2010-PolicyDocument. htm
Harvard School of Public Health: Healthy Eating Plate http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/ healthy-eating-plate/
USDA: My Plate http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials- ordering/dietary-guidelines.html
40
APPENDIX C: Local Product Availability (Los Angeles) Los Angeles wholesale distribution firms with locally sourced products:
California Produce Wholesalers Worldwide Produce 6818 Watcher St. 1661 McGarry St. Commerce, CA 90040 Los Angeles, CA 90021 Telephone: (800) 460-9193 Telephone: (800) 300-2737 Fax: (562) 928 3090 Fax: (213) 741-1777 http://www.californiaproducewholesalers.com/ http://www.wwproduce.com/
FreshPoint Southern California Processing of locally sourced produce: Locally Grown Division Field Fresh Foods 155 N. Orange Avenue Locally Fresh Foods City of Industry, CA 91744 14805 South San Pedro Street http://www.freshpoint.com Gardena, CA 90248 Telephone: (800)411-0588 Gold Star Foods http://www.fieldfre 3781 E. Airport Drive Ontario, Ca. 91761 Telephone: (800) 540-0215 Fax: (866)802-1997 http://www.goldstarfoods.com/default.asp
Heath & LeJeune 1417 South Eastman Avenue Commerce, CA 90023 Telephone: (213) 614-1909 http://soullyorganic.com/
L.A. Specialty Produce 13527 Orden Drive Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Telephone: (562) 741-2200 Fax: (562) 741-2907 http://www.laspecialty.com/index.html
Sunrise Produce Company 1400 Goodrich Blvd Commerce, CA 90022 Telephone: (323) 726-3838 http://www.sunriseproduce.com/index.html
West Central Produce 2020 East 7th Place Los Angeles, CA 90021 Telephone: (800) 464-8349 www.westcentralproduce.com
41
Photo credit: Haan-Fawn Photo Chau credit: Haan-Fawn
42
43
www.goodfoodla.org
44
Baseline Data Collection Plan for Good Food Purchasing Institutions Year 1
The list below details all deliverables requested in Year One of the Good Food Purchasing Policy. Information collected will help assess your baseline purchasing practices and will be used to develop goals and action plans for continued progress. Information will be updated annually. All forms will be provided in toolkit and electronically. Documents should be submitted to Colleen McKinney at [email protected]. DELIVERABLE DEADLINE