Recreational Mathematics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
9N1.5 Determine the Square Root of Positive Rational Numbers That Are Perfect Squares
9N1.5 Determine the square root of positive rational numbers that are perfect squares. Square Roots and Perfect Squares The square root of a given number is a value that when multiplied by itself results in the given number. For example, the square root of 9 is 3 because 3 × 3 = 9 . Example Use a diagram to determine the square root of 121. Solution Step 1 Draw a square with an area of 121 units. Step 2 Count the number of units along one side of the square. √121 = 11 units √121 = 11 units The square root of 121 is 11. This can also be written as √121 = 11. A number that has a whole number as its square root is called a perfect square. Perfect squares have the unique characteristic of having an odd number of factors. Example Given the numbers 81, 24, 102, 144, identify the perfect squares by ordering their factors from smallest to largest. Solution The square root of each perfect square is bolded. Factors of 81: 1, 3, 9, 27, 81 Since there are an odd number of factors, 81 is a perfect square. Factors of 24: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 Since there are an even number of factors, 24 is not a perfect square. Factors of 102: 1, 2, 3, 6, 17, 34, 51, 102 Since there are an even number of factors, 102 is not a perfect square. Factors of 144: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72, 144 Since there are an odd number of factors, 144 is a perfect square. -
Special Kinds of Numbers
Chapel Hill Math Circle: Special Kinds of Numbers 11/4/2017 1 Introduction This worksheet is concerned with three classes of special numbers: the polyg- onal numbers, the Catalan numbers, and the Lucas numbers. Polygonal numbers are a nice geometric generalization of perfect square integers, Cata- lan numbers are important numbers that (one way or another) show up in a wide variety of combinatorial and non-combinatorial situations, and Lucas numbers are a slight twist on our familiar Fibonacci numbers. The purpose of this worksheet is not to give an exhaustive treatment of any of these numbers, since that is just not possible. The goal is to, instead, introduce these interesting classes of numbers and give some motivation to explore on your own. 2 Polygonal Numbers The first class of numbers we'll consider are called polygonal numbers. We'll start with some simpler cases, and then derive a general formula. Take 3 points and arrange them as an equilateral triangle with side lengths of 2. Here, I use the term \side-length" to mean \how many points are in a side." The total number of points in this triangle (3) is the second triangular number, denoted P (3; 2). To get the third triangular number P (3; 3), we take the last configuration and adjoin points so that the outermost shape is an equilateral triangle with a side-length of 3. To do this, we can add 3 points along any one of the edges. Since there are 3 points in the original 1 triangle, and we added 3 points to get the next triangle, the total number of points in this step is P (3; 3) = 3 + 3 = 6. -
Power Values of Divisor Sums Author(S): Frits Beukers, Florian Luca, Frans Oort Reviewed Work(S): Source: the American Mathematical Monthly, Vol
Power Values of Divisor Sums Author(s): Frits Beukers, Florian Luca, Frans Oort Reviewed work(s): Source: The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 119, No. 5 (May 2012), pp. 373-380 Published by: Mathematical Association of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.119.05.373 . Accessed: 15/02/2013 04:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Mathematical Association of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Mathematical Monthly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:05:44 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Power Values of Divisor Sums Frits Beukers, Florian Luca, and Frans Oort Abstract. We consider positive integers whose sum of divisors is a perfect power. This prob- lem had already caught the interest of mathematicians from the 17th century like Fermat, Wallis, and Frenicle. In this article we study this problem and some variations. We also give an example of a cube, larger than one, whose sum of divisors is again a cube. 1. INTRODUCTION. Recently, one of the current authors gave a mathematics course for an audience with a general background and age over 50. -
A Simple Proof of the Mean Fourth Power Estimate
ANNALI DELLA SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE DI PISA Classe di Scienze K. RAMACHANDRA A simple proof of the mean fourth power estimate for 1 1 z(2 + it) and L(2 + it;c) Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 4e série, tome 1, no 1-2 (1974), p. 81-97 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1974_4_1_1-2_81_0> © Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1974, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ A Simple Proof of the Mean Fourth Power Estimate for 03B6(1/2 + it) and L(1/2 + it, ~). K. RAMACHANDRA (*) To the memory of Professor ALBERT EDWARD INGHAM 1. - Introduction. The main object of this paper is to prove the following four well-known theorems by a simple method. THEOREM 1. and then THEOREM 2. If T ~ 3, R>2 and Ti and also 1, then THEOREM 3. Let y be a character mod q (q fixed), T ~ 3, - tx,2 ... T, (.Rx > 2), and tx.i+,- 1. If with each y we associate such points then, where * denotes the sum over primitive character mod q. -
Triangular Numbers /, 3,6, 10, 15, ", Tn,'" »*"
TRIANGULAR NUMBERS V.E. HOGGATT, JR., and IVIARJORIE BICKWELL San Jose State University, San Jose, California 9111112 1. INTRODUCTION To Fibonacci is attributed the arithmetic triangle of odd numbers, in which the nth row has n entries, the cen- ter element is n* for even /?, and the row sum is n3. (See Stanley Bezuszka [11].) FIBONACCI'S TRIANGLE SUMS / 1 =:1 3 3 5 8 = 2s 7 9 11 27 = 33 13 15 17 19 64 = 4$ 21 23 25 27 29 125 = 5s We wish to derive some results here concerning the triangular numbers /, 3,6, 10, 15, ", Tn,'" »*". If one o b - serves how they are defined geometrically, 1 3 6 10 • - one easily sees that (1.1) Tn - 1+2+3 + .- +n = n(n±M and (1.2) • Tn+1 = Tn+(n+1) . By noticing that two adjacent arrays form a square, such as 3 + 6 = 9 '.'.?. we are led to 2 (1.3) n = Tn + Tn„7 , which can be verified using (1.1). This also provides an identity for triangular numbers in terms of subscripts which are also triangular numbers, T =T + T (1-4) n Tn Tn-1 • Since every odd number is the difference of two consecutive squares, it is informative to rewrite Fibonacci's tri- angle of odd numbers: 221 222 TRIANGULAR NUMBERS [OCT. FIBONACCI'S TRIANGLE SUMS f^-O2) Tf-T* (2* -I2) (32-22) Ti-Tf (42-32) (52-42) (62-52) Ti-Tl•2 (72-62) (82-72) (9*-82) (Kp-92) Tl-Tl Upon comparing with the first array, it would appear that the difference of the squares of two consecutive tri- angular numbers is a perfect cube. -
Labeled Factorization of Integers
Labeled Factorization of Integers Augustine O. Munagi John Knopfmacher Centre for Applicable Analysis and Number Theory School of Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa [email protected] Submitted: Jan 5, 2009; Accepted: Apr 16, 2009; Published: Apr 22, 2009 Mathematics Subject Classification: 11Y05, 05A05, 11B73, 11B13 Abstract The labeled factorizations of a positive integer n are obtained as a completion of the set of ordered factorizations of n. This follows a new technique for generating ordered factorizations found by extending a method for unordered factorizations that relies on partitioning the multiset of prime factors of n. Our results include explicit enumeration formulas and some combinatorial identities. It is proved that labeled factorizations of n are equinumerous with the systems of complementing subsets of {0, 1,...,n − 1}. We also give a new combinatorial interpretation of a class of generalized Stirling numbers. 1 Ordered and labeled factorization An ordered factorization of a positive integer n is a representation of n as an ordered product of integers, each factor greater than 1. The set of ordered factorizations of n will be denoted by F (n), and |F (n)| = f(n). For example, F (6) = {6, 2.3, 3.2}. So f(6) = 3. Every integer n> 1 has a canonical factorization into prime numbers p1,p2,..., namely m1 m2 mr n = p1 p2 ...pr , p1 <p2 < ··· <pr, mi > 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ r. (1) The enumeration function f(n) does not depend on the size of n but on the exponents mi. In particular we define Ω(n)= m1 + m2 + ··· + mr, Ω(1) = 0. -
A Subspace Theorem for Manifolds
A subspace theorem for manifolds Emmanuel Breuillard and Nicolas de Saxcé February 5, 2021 Abstract We prove a theorem that generalizes Schmidt’s Subspace Theorem in the context of metric diophantine approximation. To do so we reformulate the Subspace theorem in the framework of homogeneous dynamics by introducing and studying a slope formalism and the corresponding notion of semistability for diagonal flows. Introduction In 1972, Wolfgang Schmidt formulated his celebrated subspace theorem [32, Lemma 7], a far reaching generalization of results of Thue [37], Siegel [35], and Roth [28] on rational approximations to algebraic numbers. Around the same time, in his work on arithmeticity of lattices in Lie groups, Gregory Margulis [26] used the geometry of numbers to establish the recurrence of unipotent flows on the space of lattices GLd(R)=GLd(Z). More than two decades later, a quantita- tive refinement of this fact, the so-called quantitative non-divergence estimate, was used by Kleinbock and Margulis [18] in their solution to the Sprindzuk conjecture regarding the extremality of non-degenerate manifolds in metric dio- phantine approximation. As it turns out, these two remarkable results – the subspace theorem and the Sprindzuk conjecture – are closely related and can be understood together as statements about diagonal orbits in the space of lat- tices. In this paper we prove a theorem that generalizes both results at the same time. We also provide several applications. This marriage is possible thanks to a better understanding of the geometry lying behind the subspace theorem, in particular the notion of Harder-Narasimhan filtration for one-parameter di- agonal actions, which leads both to a dynamical reformulation of the original subspace theorem and to a further geometric understanding of the family of exceptional subspaces arising in Schmidt’s theorem. -
Grade 7/8 Math Circles the Scale of Numbers Introduction
Faculty of Mathematics Centre for Education in Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Mathematics and Computing Grade 7/8 Math Circles November 21/22/23, 2017 The Scale of Numbers Introduction Last week we quickly took a look at scientific notation, which is one way we can write down really big numbers. We can also use scientific notation to write very small numbers. 1 × 103 = 1; 000 1 × 102 = 100 1 × 101 = 10 1 × 100 = 1 1 × 10−1 = 0:1 1 × 10−2 = 0:01 1 × 10−3 = 0:001 As you can see above, every time the value of the exponent decreases, the number gets smaller by a factor of 10. This pattern continues even into negative exponent values! Another way of picturing negative exponents is as a division by a positive exponent. 1 10−6 = = 0:000001 106 In this lesson we will be looking at some famous, interesting, or important small numbers, and begin slowly working our way up to the biggest numbers ever used in mathematics! Obviously we can come up with any arbitrary number that is either extremely small or extremely large, but the purpose of this lesson is to only look at numbers with some kind of mathematical or scientific significance. 1 Extremely Small Numbers 1. Zero • Zero or `0' is the number that represents nothingness. It is the number with the smallest magnitude. • Zero only began being used as a number around the year 500. Before this, ancient mathematicians struggled with the concept of `nothing' being `something'. 2. Planck's Constant This is the smallest number that we will be looking at today other than zero. -
Input for Carnival of Math: Number 115, October 2014
Input for Carnival of Math: Number 115, October 2014 I visited Singapore in 1996 and the people were very kind to me. So I though this might be a little payback for their kindness. Good Luck. David Brooks The “Mathematical Association of America” (http://maanumberaday.blogspot.com/2009/11/115.html ) notes that: 115 = 5 x 23. 115 = 23 x (2 + 3). 115 has a unique representation as a sum of three squares: 3 2 + 5 2 + 9 2 = 115. 115 is the smallest three-digit integer, abc , such that ( abc )/( a*b*c) is prime : 115/5 = 23. STS-115 was a space shuttle mission to the International Space Station flown by the space shuttle Atlantis on Sept. 9, 2006. The “Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences” (http://www.oeis.org) notes that 115 is a tridecagonal (or 13-gonal) number. Also, 115 is the number of rooted trees with 8 vertices (or nodes). If you do a search for 115 on the OEIS website you will find out that there are 7,041 integer sequences that contain the number 115. The website “Positive Integers” (http://www.positiveintegers.org/115) notes that 115 is a palindromic and repdigit number when written in base 22 (5522). The website “Number Gossip” (http://www.numbergossip.com) notes that: 115 is the smallest three-digit integer, abc, such that (abc)/(a*b*c) is prime. It also notes that 115 is a composite, deficient, lucky, odd odious and square-free number. The website “Numbers Aplenty” (http://www.numbersaplenty.com/115) notes that: It has 4 divisors, whose sum is σ = 144. -
A Clasification of Known Root Prime-Generating
Special properties of the first absolute Fermat pseudoprime, the number 561 Marius Coman Bucuresti, Romania email: [email protected] Abstract. Though is the first Carmichael number, the number 561 doesn’t have the same fame as the third absolute Fermat pseudoprime, the Hardy-Ramanujan number, 1729. I try here to repair this injustice showing few special properties of the number 561. I will just list (not in the order that I value them, because there is not such an order, I value them all equally as a result of my more or less inspired work, though they may or not “open a path”) the interesting properties that I found regarding the number 561, in relation with other Carmichael numbers, other Fermat pseudoprimes to base 2, with primes or other integers. 1. The number 2*(3 + 1)*(11 + 1)*(17 + 1) + 1, where 3, 11 and 17 are the prime factors of the number 561, is equal to 1729. On the other side, the number 2*lcm((7 + 1),(13 + 1),(19 + 1)) + 1, where 7, 13 and 19 are the prime factors of the number 1729, is equal to 561. We have so a function on the prime factors of 561 from which we obtain 1729 and a function on the prime factors of 1729 from which we obtain 561. Note: The formula N = 2*(d1 + 1)*...*(dn + 1) + 1, where d1, d2, ...,dn are the prime divisors of a Carmichael number, leads to interesting results (see the sequence A216646 in OEIS); the formula M = 2*lcm((d1 + 1),...,(dn + 1)) + 1 also leads to interesting results (see the sequence A216404 in OEIS). -
Mathematics 2016.Pdf
UNIVERSITY INTERSCHOLASTIC LEAGUE Making a World of Diference Mathematics Invitational A • 2016 DO NOT TURN THIS PAGE UNTIL YOU ARE INSTRUCTED TO DO SO! 1. Evaluate: 1 qq 8‚ƒ 1 6 (1 ‚ 30) 1 6 (A) qq 35 (B) 11.8 (C) qqq 11.2 (D) 8 (E) 5.0333... 2. Max Spender had $40.00 to buy school supplies. He bought six notebooks at $2.75 each, three reams of paper at $1.20 each, two 4-packs of highlighter pens at $3.10 per pack, twelve pencils at 8¢ each, and six 3-color pens at 79¢ each. How much money did he have left? (A) $4.17 (B) $5.00 (C) $6.57 (D) $7.12 (E) $8.00 3. 45 miles per hour is the same speed as _________________ inches per second. (A) 792 (B) 3,240 (C) 47,520 (D) 880 (E) 66 4. If P = {p,l,a,t,o}, O = {p,t,o,l,e,m,y}, and E = {e,u,c,l,i,d} then (P O) E = ? (A) { g } (B) {p,o,e} (C) {e, l } (D) {p,o,e,m} (E) {p,l,o,t} 5. An equation for the line shown is: (A) 3x qq 2y = 1 (B) 2x 3y = 2 (C) x y = q 1 (D) 3x 2y = qq 2 (E) x y = 1.5 6. Which of the following relations describes a function? (A) { (2,3), (3,3) (4,3) (5,3) } (B) { (qq 2,0), (0, 2) (0,2) (2,0) } (C) { (0,0), (2, q2) (2,2) (3,3) } (D) { (3,3), (3,4) (3,5) (3,6) } (E) none of these are a function 7. -
A NEW LARGEST SMITH NUMBER Patrick Costello Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 (Submitted September 2000)
A NEW LARGEST SMITH NUMBER Patrick Costello Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 (Submitted September 2000) 1. INTRODUCTION In 1982, Albert Wilansky, a mathematics professor at Lehigh University wrote a short article in the Two-Year College Mathematics Journal [6]. In that article he identified a new subset of the composite numbers. He defined a Smith number to be a composite number where the sum of the digits in its prime factorization is equal to the digit sum of the number. The set was named in honor of Wi!anskyJs brother-in-law, Dr. Harold Smith, whose telephone number 493-7775 when written as a single number 4,937,775 possessed this interesting characteristic. Adding the digits in the number and the digits of its prime factors 3, 5, 5 and 65,837 resulted in identical sums of42. Wilansky provided two other examples of numbers with this characteristic: 9,985 and 6,036. Since that time, many things have been discovered about Smith numbers including the fact that there are infinitely many Smith numbers [4]. The largest Smith numbers were produced by Samuel Yates. Using a large repunit and large palindromic prime, Yates was able to produce Smith numbers having ten million digits and thirteen million digits. Using the same large repunit and a new large palindromic prime, the author is able to find a Smith number with over thirty-two million digits. 2. NOTATIONS AND BASIC FACTS For any positive integer w, we let S(ri) denote the sum of the digits of n.