Role of Olfaction in Host Plant Selection and Local Adaptation of a Polyphagous Herbivore, Eucolaspis Sharp P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of Olfaction in Host Plant Selection and Local Adaptation of a Polyphagous Herbivore, Eucolaspis Sharp P J. Appl. Entomol. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Role of olfaction in host plant selection and local adaptation of a polyphagous herbivore, Eucolaspis Sharp P. R. C. Doddala1,*, M. A. Minor1,a, Q. Wang1, D. J. Rogers2, E. M. Koot1 & S. A. Trewick1,a 1 Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 2 The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Havelock North, New Zealand Keywords Abstract attraction, bronze beetle, feeding preference, host plant volatiles Host plant cues are known to shape insect–host plant association in many insect groups. More pronounced associations are generally manifested in Correspondence specialist herbivores, but little is known in generalist herbivores. We used P. R. C. Doddala (corresponding author), a polyphagous native beetle from New Zealand, bronze beetle, Eucolaspis Institute of Agriculture and Environment, sp. ‘Hawkes Bay’ (Chrysomelidae: Eumolpinae) to explore the role of Massey University, 4442 Palmerston North, olfaction in locating host plants and local adaptation. We also tested the New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] role of other cues in the degree of acceptance or rejection of hosts. Adult *Present address: Division of Chemical Eucolaspis beetles were attracted to fresh leaf volatiles from apple and Ecology, Department of Plant Protection blackberry (Rosaceae). Male and female beetles responded similarly to Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural olfactory cues of host plants. An indication of evolutionary affiliation was Sciences, 23053, Alnarp, Sweden observed in olfactory preferences of geographically isolated conspecific populations. We found that geographically isolated populations of the Received: June 7, 2015; accepted: September beetles differ in their olfactory responses and exhibit some degree of local 23, 2015. adaptation. However, irrespective of geographical and ecological associa- doi: 10.1111/jen.12279 tions, blackberry was preferred over apple as a feeding plant, and another novel plant, bush lawyer (Rubus australis), was readily accepted by aContributed equally. 53.25% of the tested beetles. We show that plant volatiles play an impor- tant role in host location by Eucolaspis, but the acceptance or rejection of a particular host could also involve visual and contact cues. (e.g. Cymbidium) to conifers (e.g. Pinus). It appears Introduction that the beetles have a particular preference for exotic Eucolaspis, a native Eumolpinae (Coleoptera: fruit plants of the family Rosaceae, and orchards often Chrysomelidae) genus of New Zealand, comprises support large populations resulting in significant eco- polyphagous species commonly called as ‘bronze bee- nomic damage. Fruit crops from families other than tles’. Recent findings on morphology, distribution and Rosaceae such as avocado (Lauraceae), black currant phylogeny of Eucolaspis suggest fewer endemic species and gooseberry (Grossulariaceae), blueberry (Eri- (~4) than formerly described (~15) (Doddala 2012). caceae) and feijoa (Myrtaceae) are also damaged. Eucolaspis beetles were first reported on flowers of a Early records suggest that host-range expansion in New Zealand native shrub, manuka (Leptospermum sco- Eucolaspis may have occurred soon after European col- parium, Myrtaceae) (Fabricius 1781 in White 1846). onization and introduction of fruit crops in New Zeal- The beetles of the genus have since been recorded and (Huntley 1867). feeding on at least 67 other plant species in New Zeal- Infestation of host plants by different species of and, including 27 natives and 40 exotics (Table S1). Eucolaspis depends on local and regional distribution, Among the 33 plant families represented, the most as revealed from host plant use by different genetic common hosts are Myrtaceae and Rosaceae (11 and 6 lineages in New Zealand (Doddala 2012). We also sus- species, respectively), but host plants range from small pect some level of intraspecific variation in host plant pasture herbs (e.g. Trifolium) and terrestrial orchids use by bronze beetles, as seen in other leaf beetles 444 J. Appl. Entomol. 140 (2016) 444–452 © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH P. R. C. Doddala et al. Host plant associations of Eucolaspis such as Chrysomela lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomeli- Materials and Methods dae) (Zvereva et al. 2010) and Agelasa nigriceps (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Kohyama et al. 2012). Normal seemingly healthy (showed no impairment We are particularly interested in the Eucolaspis sp. in walking, flying and feeding) adult beetles were ‘Hawkes Bay’ lineage, which infests apple trees and used for all bioassays. The test beetles originated also occurs on exotic blackberry, linden, white clover, from two different populations – an ‘apple popula- broad-leaved dock, native manuka and totara trees tion’ from an organic apple orchard (‘Royal Gala’) and possibly other plant species (Doddala 2012). in Havelock North (Hawkes Bay, New Zealand) and Long-term association with a host plant might lead a ‘blackberry population’ from a blackberry scrub in to stronger preference, through tolerance, detoxifica- Waikanae (Kapiti Coast, New Zealand). The two tion and recognition, which can have important populations used will be referred as ‘Havelock North implications for infestation of crop species and other apple’ and ‘Waikanae blackberry’ populations from hosts (Jermy 1984; Mostafa et al. 2011). Some geo- this point forward. Conspecificity of these two pop- graphically isolated conspecific populations of Euco- ulations was confirmed through the analysis of laspis sp. ‘Hawkes Bay’ persist on different host plants mitochondrial DNA and male genitalia (Doddala (apple and blackberry), suggesting local adaptation. It 2012). Insect collection, rearing and maintenance is not known whether these allopatric conspecific have been followed as previously described (Dod- populations exhibit differences in sensory abilities in dala 2012). Beetles used in the study were starved locating and selecting respective host plants. Any such for 4 h prior to bioassays. Starving is necessary to differences could impact pest control methods such as induce host finding or feeding and is a widely used behavioural control exploiting host plant stimuli. practice in similar experiments with herbivorous Hence, from both economic and scientific perspec- insects (Garcıa-Robledo and Horvitz 2009). tives, it is important to assess intraspecific differences The role of olfaction in host detection was tested in host plant choice and location in Eucolaspis sp. initially with Havelock North apple population beetles ‘Hawkes Bay’ beetles leading to local adaptation. in Y-tube bioassays (no-choice: host plant vs. clean In Chrysomelidae, cues that mediate attraction to air) using four plant species: apple (Malus domesticus host plants include plant size (Colorado potato beetle CV ‘Royal Gala’, Rosaceae), blackberry (Rubus fruitico- Leptinotarsa decemlineata – (Hoy et al. 2000)), other sus, Rosaceae), white clover (Trifolium repens, Faba- visual cues (e.g. L. decemlineata – (Szentesi et al. 2002) ceae) and broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius, and Phyllotreta striolata – (Yang et al. 2003)) and plant Polygonaceae). White clover and broad-leaved dock volatiles (e.g. L. decemlineata – (Bolter et al. 1997; are predominant under-storey plants in organic apple Schutz€ et al. 1997) and the strawberry leaf beetle, orchards in New Zealand, and both these plant species Galerucella vittaticollis – (Hori et al. 2006)). Among dif- are infested by bronze beetles in the field (P. Doddala, ferent host-finding cues, olfactory cues are the most pers. obs.). Fresh undamaged leaves of test plants frequently used (Stenberg and Ericson 2007). At least were used as host plant stimulus, and clean air was twelve leaf beetle genera show attraction to host plant used as control. volatiles (Fernandez and Hilker 2007; Stenberg and Intraspecific differences in olfaction were tested, Ericson 2007; El-Sayed 2014). None of the previously using Havelock North apple and Waikanae black- studied genera belongs to the subfamily Eumolpinae, berry populations that have different geographical which remains poorly studied in this respect. and host plant association, by dual-choice bioassays We examined preference for host plants among dif- (apple vs. blackberry) in the Y-tube olfactometer. In ferent populations of bronze beetles and assessed the addition, two sets of feeding bioassays were con- extent of preference as determined by evolutionary ducted either as a dual-choice (apple and black- association. The specific objectives of this research berry) or a tri-choice (apple, blackberry and bush were to evaluate whether the bronze beetles show lawyer) assay with the two test beetle populations. attraction to host plant odours and to explore whether Bush lawyer (Rubus australis) is a New Zealand allopatric conspecific populations vary in sensitivity to native Rosaceae that has never been reported as a olfactory, gustatory and other contact cues in host host plant for the beetles; we included this plant to plant preference. We conducted olfactory and feeding test how a novel host would influence meal compo- bioassays involving various known host plants and a sition. All the experiments were conducted during novel plant, with two conspecific populations of Euco- the active seasons (New Zealand spring – summer) laspis sp. ‘Hawkes Bay’ adult beetles. 2009–2013. J. Appl. Entomol. 140 (2016) 444–452 © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH 445 Host plant associations of Eucolaspis P. R. C. Doddala et al. Post-feeding,
Recommended publications
  • Temporal Development and Regeneration Dynamics of Restored Urban Forests
    Temporal Development and Regeneration Dynamics of Restored Urban Forests By Katherine de Silva A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Ecology & Biodiversity School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Sciences Victoria University of Wellington October 2019 Supervisors: Stephen Hartley. Director of the Centre of Biodiversity & Restoration Ecology, Victoria University of Wellington Kiri Joy Wallace. Postdoctoral Fellow, Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato. Katherine de Silva: Temporal Development and Regeneration Dynamics of Restored Urban Forests, © October 2019. 2 ABSTRACT Urban forest restoration programmes are a key tool used to initiate, re-create or accelerate the succession of forest species; improving ecosystem services, function, resilience and biodiversity. Succession is a temporal shift in species dominance driven by abiotic and biotic influences, but over decadal timescales the trajectory and success of restoration plantings in degraded urban environments can be hindered. To facilitate the successful reconstruction of forest ecosystems from scratch, an understanding of the temporal patterns in planted forest development, dynamics of seedling regeneration and dominant drivers of seedling diversity is required. Using a chronosequence approach, permanent plots were established at 44 restored urban forests aged 5 to 59 years since initial plantings took place, across five New Zealand cities between Wellington and Invercargill. Vegetation surveys were undertaken and data on micro- climate were collected. This study examined the 1) temporal dynamics of restored urban forest development and seedling regeneration and 2) dominant drivers of seedling regeneration. Data were analysed using linear regression models, breakpoint analysis and mixed-effects modelling. Early forest development (<20 years) exhibited the most changes in canopy composition and structure, forest floor dynamics, seedling community and microclimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on High Country and Auckland North | Lizard Habitat | Native Vines
    Open space $7.50 MAGAZINE OF THE QUEEN ELIZABETH II NATIONAL TRUST ISSUE 75 | MARCH 2009 Focus on High Country and Auckland North | Lizard Habitat | Native Vines Regional Representatives Contents Far North Greg Blunden Ph 09 407 1119 [email protected] 3 News and Events Kaipara Nick Matich 9 Ph 09 439 8932 [email protected] 4 Focus: High Country Whangarei Nan Pullman 7 Focus: Auckland North Ph/Fax 09 434 3457 [email protected] Northwest Auckland Dan Godoy 11 Research: Lizard diversity and abundance Ph 09 529 2474 [email protected] South Auckland Lynda Fleming 12 Protecting the habitat of skinks and geckos Ph 09 238 5739 [email protected] 15 Research: Forest remnant resilience Coromandel – Hauraki Hamish Kendal Ph 07 866 0770 [email protected] 12 16 Waikato tawa forest covenants Waikato Rex Webby Ph 07 853 2504 [email protected] 17 Fencing: Historic Southland fence East Waikato Hamish Dean 18 Know your natives: Vines Ph 021 741 222 [email protected] Waitomo – Otorohanga Malcolm Mackenzie 21 Dairy farms: Protecting bush remnants Ph 07 873 7728 [email protected] Bay of Plenty Hamish Dean 22 Recording ecological changes Ph 021 741 222 [email protected] 25 Fragments 18 Gisborne Malcolm Piper Ph/Fax 06 867 0255 [email protected] 26 Archaeological sites: Hawke’s Bay kumara pits Hawke’s Bay Troy Duncan Ph 06 844 3838 [email protected] 27 Covenants update Taranaki Neil Phillips 29 Trust people Ph 06 753 6433 [email protected] Taupo-Ruapehu Hamish Dean 30 About QEII Trust Ph 021 741 222 [email protected] 32 Rangitikei – Manawatu – Wanganui 32 In the community: Ruahine School Bush John Williamson Ph 06 328 6851 [email protected] Tararua Bill Wallace Helping you protect the special nature of your land Ph 06 376 7796 [email protected] QEII Trust helps landowners to protect significant natural and cultural features on Wairarapa Trevor Thompson their land.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Pastoral-Tenure Review-Beaumont-Conservation
    Crown Pastoral Land Tenure Review Lease name : BEAUMONT STATION Lease number : PO 362 Conservation Resources Report - Part 2 As part of the process of Tenure Review, advice on significant inherent values within the pastoral lease is provided by Department of Conservation officials in the form of a Conservation Resources Report. This report is the result of outdoor survey and inspection. It is a key piece of information for the development of a preliminary consultation document. Note: Plans which form part of the Conservation Resources Report are published separately. These documents are all released under the Official information Act 1982. December 10 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT APPENDIX 5: Plant Species List – Beaumont Pastoral Lease Scientific name Plant type Family Abundance Localities Threat ranking Common at site name Abrotanella caespitosa DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Asteraceae Local Wetlands Not threatened Abrotanella inconspicua DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Asteraceae Local Ridgetops Not threatened Abrotanella patearoa DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Asteraceae Local Tops Naturally Uncommon Acaena anserinifolia DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Rosaceae Occasional Throughout Not threatened bidibid Acaena caesiiglauca DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Rosaceae Occasional Tussockland Not threatened bidibid Acaena inermis DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Rosaceae Rare Gravels Not threatened bidibid Acaena novae-zelandiae DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Rosaceae Rare Lower altitudes Not threatened bidibid Acaena tesca DICOTYLEDONOUS HERBS Rosaceae Rare Rock outcrops Naturally Uncommon bidibid
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Plant Lists
    Page 1 MEDWAY ECOLOGICAL DISTRICT Dry Wet Only Moist Sector SHRUBLAND/FOREST Forest Species) establish Bird Food Shrubland appropriate) Shade intolerant Above 300m only Shade required to Open Rocky Sites Sheltered Moist Sites Sites Sheltered Moist Initial Shelter (Nurse Initial Showy Flowers or Fruit Localized or Rare in this Threat Classification (if TALL TREES 20m+ Nothofagus solandri var 22Fr,H solandri Black beech Halls/mountain 222Fr Podocarpus hallii Totara Podocarpus totara Totara 22Fr Prumnopitys taxifolia Matai 22 2 Fr R SMALL TREES 5-15 metres Alectryon excelsus Titoki 22 22Fr Fr Aristotelia serrata Wineberry 22 22Fr Fl L Putaputaweta , 22 2 Fr Fl Carpodetus serratus marbleleaf Cordyline australis Cabbage tree 2222222 Fl,Fr Fl Cyathea dealbata Silver fern 22 22 R Cyathea medullaris Mamaku 22 22 R Dicksonia squarrosa Wheki 22 22 R Griselinia littoralis Broadleaf 22 22 Fr Hebe parviflora Tree hebe 22 22 Fl Narrow-leaved 2 222Fl, Lv Fl R Hoheria angustifolia lacebark Kunzea ericoides Kanuka 2222222 NFl Leptospermum scoparium Manuka 2222 222 NFl Lophomyrtus obcordata Rohutu 22 22Fr R Last updated August, 2009 Page 2 MEDWAY ECOLOGICAL DISTRICT Dry Wet Only Moist Sector SHRUBLAND/FOREST Forest Species) establish Bird Food Shrubland appropriate) Shade intolerant Above 300m only Shade required to Open Rocky Sites Sheltered Moist Sites Sites Sheltered Moist Initial Shelter (Nurse Initial Showy Flowers or Fruit Localized or Rare in this Threat Classification (if Melicytus ramiflorus Mahoe 22 2 Fr Myrsine australis Mapou , red matipo 2
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/016826 Al 4 February 2016 (04.02.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/016826 Al 4 February 2016 (04.02.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agent: xyAJ PARK; Level 22, State Insurance Tower, 1 A01H 1/06 (2006.01) C12N 15/61 (2006.01) Willis Street, Wellington (NZ). C12N 15/29 (2006.01) A01H 5/08 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12N 15/113 (2010.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (21) International Application Number: AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, PCT/IB2015/055743 BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 30 July 2015 (30.07.2015) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (25) Filing Language: English MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (26) Publication Language: English SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (30) Priority Data: TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. 6282 14 1 August 2014 (01.08.2014) NZ (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (72) Inventors; and kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicants : DARE, Andrew Patrick [NZ/NZ]; 40 Jef GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, ferson Street, Glendowie, Auckland, 1071 (NZ).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,973,216 B2 Espley Et Al
    US007973216 B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,973,216 B2 Espley et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 5, 2011 (54) COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR 6,037,522 A 3/2000 Dong et al. MODULATING PGMENT PRODUCTION IN 6,074,877 A 6/2000 DHalluin et al. 2004.0034.888 A1 2/2004 Liu et al. PLANTS FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventors: Richard Espley, Auckland (NZ); Roger WO WOO1, 59 103 8, 2001 Hellens, Auckland (NZ); Andrew C. WO WO O2/OO894 1, 2002 WO WO O2/O55658 T 2002 Allan, Auckland (NZ) WO WOO3,0843.12 10, 2003 WO WO 2004/096994 11, 2004 (73) Assignee: The New Zealand Institute for Plant WO WO 2005/001050 1, 2005 and food Research Limited, Auckland (NZ) OTHER PUBLICATIONS Bovy et al. (Plant Cell, 14:2509-2526, Published 2002).* (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Wells (Biochemistry 29:8509-8517, 1990).* patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Guo et al. (PNAS, 101: 9205-9210, 2004).* U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Keskinet al. (Protein Science, 13:1043-1055, 2004).* Thornton et al. (Nature structural Biology, structural genomics (21) Appl. No.: 12/065,251 supplement, Nov. 2000).* Ngo et al., (The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure (22) PCT Filed: Aug. 30, 2006 Prediction, K. Merz., and S. Le Grand (eds.) pp. 492-495, 1994).* Doerks et al., (TIG, 14:248-250, 1998).* (86). PCT No.: Smith et al. (Nature Biotechnology, 15:1222-1223, 1997).* Bork et al. (TIG, 12:425-427, 1996).* S371 (c)(1), Vom Endt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari Restoration Plan 2019–2029
    Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari Restoration Plan 2019–2029 Prepared for: Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust June 2019 Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari Restoration Plan 2019–2029 Contract Report: LC3464 John Innes, Corinne Watts Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Bruce Burns University of Auckland With contributions from other members of, and advisors to, the Maungatautari Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel: Aaron Barnsdall (Mana Whenua Trustee) Geoff Churchill (Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust) Professor Bruce Clarkson (University of Waikato) Poto Davies (Maungatautari Mana Whenua) Dr Catherine Kirby (University of Waikato) Cheridan Mathers (Hamilton Zoo) Dr Shelley Langton-Myers (EcoQuest Education Foundation) Robyn Nightingale (Maungatautari Mana Whenua) Dr Kate Richardson (Waikato Regional Council) Tony Roxburgh (Waipa District Council) Alan Saunders (Waikato Regional Council) Dr Andrew Styche (Department of Conservation) Dr Kiri Wallace (University of Waikato) Dr Janelle Ward (Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust) Reviewed by: Approved for release by: Robyn Simcock Gary Houliston Scientist Portfolio Leader – Enhancing Biodiversity Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research for Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust. If used by other parties, no warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy and no liability is accepted for loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from reliance on the information in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of New Zealand Indigenous Vascular Plants, 2012
    NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 3 Conservation status of New Zealand indigenous vascular plants, 2012 Peter J. de Lange, Jeremy R. Rolfe, Paul D. Champion, Shannel P. Courtney, Peter B. Heenan, John W. Barkla, Ewen K. Cameron, David A. Norton and Rodney A. Hitchmough Cover: The Nationally Critical shrub Pittosporum serpentinum from the Surville Cliffs is severely affected by possums, and no seedlings have been found during recent surveys. Photo: Jeremy Rolfe. New Zealand Threat Classification Series is a scientific monograph series presenting publications related to the New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS). Most will be lists providing NZTCS status of members of a plant or animal group (e.g. algae, birds, spiders). There are currently 23 groups, each assessed once every 3 years. After each 3-year cycle there will be a report analysing and summarising trends across all groups for that listing cycle. From time to time the manual that defines the categories, criteria and process for the NZTCS will be reviewed. Publications in this series are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright August 2013, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 2324–1713 (web PDF) ISBN 978–0–478–14995–1 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by the Publishing Team; editing by Amanda Todd and layout by Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the Deputy Director-General, Science and Capability Group, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryopreservation of Shoot Tips of Blackberry and Raspberry by Encapsulation-Dehydration and Vitrification
    CryoLetters 27(1), 29-42 (2006) CryoLetters, c/o Royal Veterinary College, London NW1 0TU, UK CRYOPRESERVATION OF SHOOT TIPS OF BLACKBERRY AND RASPBERRY BY ENCAPSULATION-DEHYDRATION AND VITRIFICATION Sandhya Gupta* and Barbara M. Reed U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Clonal Germplasm Repository, 33447 Peoria Road, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, USA corbr@ars- grin.gov *Corresponding author, Present address: Tissue Culture and Cryopreservation Unit, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India. Email: [email protected]. Abstract Encapsulation-dehydration and PVS2-vitrification cryopreservation protocols were evaluated for the long-term conservation of a diverse group of Rubus germplasm. Cold acclimation for a 4-week period prior to cryopreservation was necessary for regrowth of shoot apices from blackberry and raspberry genotypes. For the encapsulation-dehydration protocol, encapsulated apices were pretreated in 0.75 M sucrose for 20 h, desiccated 6-h under laminar flow to ~20% moisture content, then plunged in liquid nitrogen (LN) and rapidly warmed. The PVS2-vitrification protocol included pretreating shoot tips on 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) medium for 48 h, exposure to loading solution (LS) and PVS2 for 20 min each at 25ºC, followed by immersion in LN and rapid warming. Shoot tips of 25 genotypes in 9 Rubus species and 9 Rubus hybrids were successfully cryopreserved with recovery of 60- 100% using the encapsulation-dehydration protocol. Four genotypes of 3 species were tested using the vitrification protocol with 71% average regrowth. The present results indicate that both of these improved cryopreservation protocols can be applied to a diverse range of Rubus genetic resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List for an Area
    Wildlife Online Extract Search Criteria: Species List for a Selected Area Species: All Type: Native Status: All Records: All Area: Gold Coast City Council Email: [email protected] Date submitted: Thursday 20 Oct 2011 13:15:51 Date extracted: Thursday 20 Oct 2011 13:16:02 The number of records retrieved = 3350 Disclaimer As the DERM is still in a process of collating and vetting data, it is possible the information given is not complete. The information provided should only be used for the project for which it was requested and it should be appropriately acknowledged as being derived from Wildlife Online when it is used. The State of Queensland does not invite reliance upon, nor accept responsibility for this information. Persons should satisfy themselves through independent means as to the accuracy and completeness of this information. No statements, representations or warranties are made about the accuracy or completeness of this information. The State of Queensland disclaims all responsibility for this information and all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you may incur as a result of the information being inaccurate or incomplete in any way for any reason. Feedback about Wildlife Online should be emailed to [email protected] Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q A Records animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria brevipalmata green thighed frog NT 5 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria caerulea common green treefrog C 55 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria chloris orange eyed treefrog C 52/17 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria dentata bleating treefrog C 16/1 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria nasuta striped rocketfrog C 37 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria pearsoniana cascade treefrog V 200/5 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria revelata whirring treefrog NT 17 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria sp.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Put Nature Into Our Neighbourhoods
    Urban Greening Manual How to Put Nature into Our Neighbourhoods Application of Low Impact Urban Design and Development (LIUDD) Principles, with a Biodiversity Focus, for New Zealand Developers and Homeowners Maria Ignatieva, Colin Meurk, Marjorie van Roon, Robyn Simcock and Glenn Stewart Landcare Research Science Series No. 35 Coastal plant signature featuring sand coprosma, sea spurge, sedges, ngaio and cabbage trees, New Brighton, Christchurch. Photo: Colin Meurk Scree garden plant signatures on the Wellington Governors Bay native bush and rock gardens, the Waterfront – featuring sedges, knobby clubrush, silver and latter employing korokio, pohuehue, mikimiki, NZ fl ax, other tussock grasses, rengarenga, pohuehue, NZ iris, NZ lancewood, and cotulas in the lawn. Photo: Colin Meurk linen fl ax and reeds in swales beyond. Photo: Colin Meurk Large scale formal native (and adjacent conventional English) garden with totara, matai and miro hedges, kahikatea avenue, copses of different tree types and a diverse New Zealand border of trees and shrubs, Broadfi elds, near Prebbleton, Canterbury. Photo: Colin Meurk Urban Greening Manual How to Put Nature into Our Neighbourhoods Application of Low Impact Urban Design and Development (LIUDD) Principles, with a Biodiversity Focus, for New Zealand Developers and Homeowners Maria Ignatieva, Colin Meurk, Marjorie van Roon, Robyn Simcock and Glenn Stewart © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2008 This information may be copied or reproduced electronically and distributed to others without restriction, provided Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd is acknowledged as the source of information. Under no circumstances may a charge be made for this information without the express permission of Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd.
    [Show full text]