DOCSLIB.ORG

The Geology of Geomechanics: Petroleum Geomechanical Engineering in field Development Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Geology of Geomechanics: Petroleum Geomechanical Engineering in field Development Planning Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 30, 2021 The geology of geomechanics: petroleum geomechanical engineering in field development planning M. A. ADDIS Rockfield Software Ltd, Ethos, Kings Road, Swansea Waterfront SA1 8AS, UK Tony.Addis@rockfieldglobal.com Abstract: The application of geomechanics to oil and gas field development leads to significant improvements in the economic performance of the asset. The geomechanical issues that affect field development start at the exploration stage and continue to affect appraisal and development decisions all the way through to field abandonment. Field developments now use improved static reservoir characterization, which includes both the mechanical properties of the field and the initial stress distribution over the field, along with numerical reservoir modelling to assess the dynamic stress evolution that accompanies oil and gas production, or fluid injection, into the reservoirs. Characterizing large volumes of rock in the subsurface for geomechanical analysis is accompa- nied by uncertainty resulting from the low core sampling rates of around 1 part per trillion (ppt) for geomechanical properties and due to the remote geophysical and petrophysical techniques used to construct field models. However, some uncertainties also result from theoretical simplifications used to describe the geomechanical behaviour of the geology. This paper provides a brief overview of geomechanical engineering applied to petroleum field developments. Select case studies are used to highlight how detailed geological knowledge improves the geomechanical characterization and analysis of field developments. The first case study investigates the stress regimes present in active fault systems and re-evaluates the industry’s interpretation of Andersonian stress states of faulting. The second case study discusses how the stress magnitudes and, potentially, stress regimes can change as a result of production and pore pressure depletion in an oil or gas field. The last case study addresses the geomechanical charac- terization of reservoirs, showing how subtle changes in geological processes are manifested in significant variations in strength. The studies presented here illustrate how the timely application of petroleum geomechanical engineering can significantly enhance field development, including drilling performance, infill drilling, completion design, production and recovery. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. Geomechanical analysis is based on a comparison of strains accompanying these deformations can con- rock mechanical properties and strengths with the trol the present day initial stresses and textures in stresses acting in situ. When the magnitudes of the many reservoirs. However, oil field developments stresses acting in the rock are lower than the yield lead to geomechanical changes, including the strength, the rocks behave elastically and deforma- following: tions are small. However, if the changes in stress (1) rock excavation during drilling results in well- resulting from excavation during drilling, or from bore stability and sand production problems; pore pressure or thermal variations exceed the com- (2) removing pore fluid and pressures from the pressive yield, peak or pore collapse strengths, the rock results in compaction and subsidence; rock will fail through shearing or compaction, lead- (3) injection into the reservoirs increases the pres- ing to non-linear irreversible deformation. If, on the sure and induces thermal changes, which result other hand, the stresses become tensile, fracturing of in rock fracturing or shearing to enhance the the formation can occur. natural geologically controlled permeability. A brief timeline of the important developments This is accompanied by significant changes in geomechanical engineering applied to oil and in the reservoir and overburden stresses and gas extraction (Fig. 1) shows that these issues have strains. been pursued since the earliest days of widespread hydrocarbon extraction, attracting the attention of In short, field development activities, from drilling some of the most notable figures in the industry. to stimulation, perturb the initial geological condi- The geological expression of the geomechanical, tions. It is the job of the petroleum geomechanical or structural, processes that are responsible for the engineer to characterize the initial stress regime development of many oilfields include folding, fault- and the material properties, including the strength ing, fracturing and diapirism. The stress regimes and of rocks, to predict and plan for any changes in From:Turner, J. P., Healy, D., Hillis,R.R.&Welch, M. J. (eds) 2017. Geomechanics and Geology. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 458, 7–29. First published online June 28, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP458.7 # 2017 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 30, 2021 8 M. A. ADDIS Bell & Gough, Geertsma Bradley, Reservoir Hottman et al. Bol et al. Compaction Mechanical Mechanical Borehole influence of Hubbert & Willis Instability drilling fluids is Hydraulic Kirsch recognised Terzaghi Fracturing Stress Biot Effective around a Poroelasticity Hubbert & Rubey Stress Morita et al., Alberty Present circular hole Overpressures & Mclean, Anderson and faulting Depletion & Wellbore Stress Stress Caging Instability Systems Antheunis et al. in industry Sand Hatchell for Faulting articles Production et al., Kenter 1959 ‘76 ‘79 1994 1990/ ‘03 et al. 4D Drill 1905 1925 1941 1957 Seismic fluids 2000 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Fig. 1. Timeline of notable developments in the adoption of geomechanics in the oil and gas industry. Modified from SPE Distinguished Lecture by D. Moos (2014). either of the stress magnitudes or deformations The number of publications increased gradually accompanying the field development. The perturba- through the 1990s, with a significant increase tions can be small and linear in nature, going unno- around 2000, predating the successful development ticed in many developments. However, when large of shale gas in the USA in 2004 or the increase in US changes occur, the response of the formations may shale oil production after 2010. This measure of become non-linear, or plastic, leading to safety industry uptake does not take into account different breaches and lost production, costing billions of aspects of geomechanical analysis, such as compac- dollars in design changes in the worst-affected tion, hydraulic fracturing and wellbore stability, fields. As the industry pushes for increased effi- which have been used by the industry for a much ciency, greater safety and improved economics longer period than that indicated in Figure 2. Com- in increasingly challenging fields, all aspects of paction and subsidence has attracted considerable the development are expected to deliver improved activity and interest since the late 1950s, with the field performance, including the discipline of notable examples of the Wilmington, Ekofisk, Gro- geomechanics. ningen and the Central Luconia fields, demonstrat- The application of geomechanics to oil and gas ing the extent to which reservoirs are dynamic field development has become increasingly com- during the field development. Wellbore stability mon over the past 40 years, with asset teams in the and sand production have been a focus in the indus- more challenging and larger field developments try since the late 1970s, particularly after 1979 when adopting geomechanical engineers as a permanent four seminal wellbore stability papers were pub- part of the team. The growth of unconventional oil lished (Bradley 1979a, b; Bell & Gough 1979; and gas developments has accelerated this trend Hottman et al. 1979). These presaged a step change because the need to hydraulically fracture reservoir in drilling inclined, high-angle, extended and hori- formations, or to shear the natural fracture network, zontal wells, both onshore in the Austin chalk, to generate artificial reservoir permeability relies on the North Slope of Alaska, and offshore in the geomechanical knowledge of the mechanical prop- North Sea and Gulf of Mexico in the 1980s and erties and initial stresses, as well as on the evolution early 1990s. Figure 2 reflects the uptake of the now- of the reservoir stresses during field development. accepted discipline of geomechanics into field The continual adoption of geomechanical engi- development. neering in the industry is difficult to judge quantita- Numerous textbooks comprehensively address tively. However, a good indicator of the level of both the theory and application of geomechanical integration of petroleum geomechanics in the indus- engineering to field planning (Charlez 1991, 1997; try is the number of papers published annually by Fjaer et al. 2008; Zoback 2008; Aadnoy & Looyeh the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) and 2011). This paper, in contrast, presents an individual stored in the SPE library containing the term ‘geo- view and geomechanical insights from significant mechanics’ in the publication title (Fig. 2). field developments, with emphasis on the geological Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 30, 2021 PETROLEUM GEOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING 9 50 'Geomechanics' in Paper Title 40 30 20 SPE Papers Published Per Year Year SPE Papers Published Per 10 0 2011 2011
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards a Geo-Hydro-Mechanical Characterization of Landslide Classes: Preliminary Results
    applied sciences Article Towards A Geo-Hydro-Mechanical Characterization of Landslide Classes: Preliminary Results Federica Cotecchia 1 , Francesca Santaloia 2 and Vito Tagarelli 1,* 1 DICATECH, Polytechnic University of Bari, 4, 70126 Bari, Italy; [email protected] 2 IRPI, National Research Council, 4, 70126 Bari, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-3928654797 Received: 21 September 2020; Accepted: 4 November 2020; Published: 10 November 2020 Abstract: Nowadays, landslides still cause both deaths and heavy economic losses around the world, despite the development of risk mitigation measures, which are often not effective; this is mainly due to the lack of proper analyses of landslide mechanisms. As such, in order to achieve a decisive advancement for sustainable landslide risk management, our knowledge of the processes that generate landslide phenomena has to be broadened. This is possible only through a multidisciplinary analysis that covers the complexity of landslide mechanisms that is a fundamental part of the design of the mitigation measure. As such, this contribution applies the “stage-wise” methodology, which allows for geo-hydro-mechanical (GHM) interpretations of landslide processes, highlighting the importance of the synergy between geological-geomorphological analysis and hydro-mechanical modeling of the slope processes for successful interpretations of slope instability, the identification of the causes and the prediction of the evolution of the process over time. Two case studies are reported, showing how to apply GHM analyses of landslide mechanisms. After presenting the background methodology, this contribution proposes a research project aimed at the GHM characterization of landslides, soliciting the support of engineers in the selection of the most sustainable and effective mitigation strategies for different classes of landslides.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustal Stress State and Seismic Hazard Along Southwest Segment of the Longmenshan Thrust Belt After Wenchuan Earthquake
    Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 676–688, August 2014 ISSN 1674-487X Printed in China DOI: 10.1007/s12583-014-0457-z Crustal Stress State and Seismic Hazard along Southwest Segment of the Longmenshan Thrust Belt after Wenchuan Earthquake Xianghui Qin*, Chengxuan Tan, Qunce Chen, Manlu Wu, Chengjun Feng Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; Key Laboratory of Neotectonic Movement & Geohazard, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100081, China ABSTRACT: The crustal stress and seismic hazard estimation along the southwest segment of the Longmenshan thrust belt after the Wenchuan Earthquake was conducted by hydraulic fracturing for in-situ stress measurements in four boreholes at the Ridi, Wasigou, Dahegou, and Baoxing sites in 2003, 2008, and 2010. The data reveals relatively high crustal stresses in the Kangding region (Ridi, Wasigou, and Dahegou sites) before and after the Wenchuan Earthquake, while the stresses were relatively low in the short time after the earthquake. The crustal stress in the southwest of the Longmenshan thrust belt, especially in the Kangding region, may not have been totally released during the earthquake, and has since increased. Furthermore, the Coulomb failure criterion and Byerlee’s law are adopted to analyzed in-situ stress data and its implications for fault activity along the southwest segment. The magnitudes of in-situ stresses are still close to or exceed the expected lower bound for fault activity, revealing that the studied region is likely to be active in the future. From the conclusions drawn from our and other methods, the southwest segment of the Longmenshan thrust belt, especially the Baoxing region, may present a future seismic hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Methods in Geomechanics
    Antonio Bobet NUMERICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS Antonio Bobet School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA اﻟﺨﻼﺻـﺔ: ﺗﻘﺪم هﺬﻩ اﻟﻮرﻗﺔ وﺻﻔ ﺎً ﻟﻠﻄﺮق اﻟﻌﺪدﻳﺔ اﻷآﺜﺮ اﺳﺘﺨﺪاﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻤﻴﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﺎ اﻟﺠﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ. وهﻲ أرﺑﻌﺔ ﻃﺮق : (1) ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ اﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ اﻟﻤﻤﻴﺰ (2) ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ اﻟﻨﺸﻮة اﻟﻤﺘﻘﻄﻊ (3) ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ اﻟﺘﺤﺎم اﻟﺠﺴﻴﻤﺎت (4) ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ اﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ اﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ اﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ. وﺗﻀﻤﻨﺖ اﻟﻮرﻗﺔ أ ﻳ ﻀ ﺎً وﺻﻔ ﺎً ﻣﻮﺟﺰ اً ﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ اﻟﻤﺒﺎدئ اﻟﺨﻮارزﻣﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ إﺿﺎﻓﺔ إﻟﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻟﺘﻮﺿﻴﺢ اﺳﺘﺨﺪاﻣﻬﺎ. ______________________ *Corresponding Author: E-mail: [email protected] Paper Received November 7, 2009; Paper Revised January 17, 2009; Paper Accepted February 3, 2010 April 2010 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 35, Number 1B 27 Antonio Bobet ABSTRACT The paper presents a description of the numerical methods most used in geomechanics. The following methods are included: (1) The Distinct Element Method; (2) The Discontinuous Deformation Analysis Method; (3) The Bonded Particle Method; and (4) The Artificial Neural Network Method. A brief description of the fundamental algorithms that apply to each method is included, as well as a simple case to illustrate their use. Key words: numerical methods, geomechanics, continuum, discontinuum, finite difference, finite element, discrete element, discontinuous deformation analysis, bonded particle, artificial neural network 28 The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 35, Number 1B April 2010 Antonio Bobet NUMERICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS 1. INTRODUCTION Analytical methods are very useful in geomechanics because they provide results with very limited effort and highlight the most important variables that determine the solution of a problem. Analytical solutions, however, have often a limited application since they must be used within the range of assumptions made for their development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Rock Engineering
    The development of rock engineering Introduction We tend to think of rock engineering as a modern discipline and yet, as early as 1773, Coulomb included results of tests on rocks from Bordeaux in a paper read before the French Academy in Paris (Coulomb, 1776, Heyman, 1972). French engineers started construction of the Panama Canal in 1884 and this task was taken over by the US Army Corps of Engineers in 1908. In the half century between 1910 and 1964, 60 slides were recorded in cuts along the canal and, although these slides were not analysed in rock mechanics terms, recent work by the US Corps of Engineers (Lutton et al, 1979) shows that these slides were predominantly controlled by structural discontinuities and that modern rock mechanics concepts are fully applicable to the analysis of these failures. In discussing the Panama Canal slides in his Presidential Address to the first international conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering in 1936, Karl Terzaghi (Terzaghi, 1936, Terzaghi and Voight, 1979) said ‘The catastrophic descent of the slopes of the deepest cut of the Panama Canal issued a warning that we were overstepping the limits of our ability to predict the consequences of our actions ....’. In 1920 Josef Stini started teaching ‘Technical Geology’ at the Vienna Technical University and before he died in 1958 he had published 333 papers and books (Müller, 1979). He founded the journal Geologie und Bauwesen, the forerunner of today’s journal Rock Mechanics, and was probably the first to emphasise the importance of structural discontinuities on the engineering behaviour of rock masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning” Ref: AGS (2007A)
    Extract from Australian Geomechanics Journal and News of the Australian Geomechanics Society Volume 42 No 1 March 2007 Extract containing: “Guideline for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning” Ref: AGS (2007a) Landslide Risk Management ISSN 0818-9110 GUIDELINE FOR LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY, HAZARD AND RISK ZONING FOR LAND USE PLANNING Australian Geomechanics Society Landslide Zoning Working Group TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................. 13 2 DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY............................................................................................................. 14 3 LANDSLIDE RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ................................................................................... 15 4 DESCRIPTION OF LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY, HAZARD AND RISK ZONING FOR LAND USE PLANNING ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 5 GUIDANCE ON WHERE LANDSLIDE ZONING IS USEFUL FOR LAND USE PLANNING................. 17 6 SELECTION OF THE TYPE AND LEVEL OF LANDSLIDE ZONING ...................................................... 19 7 LANDSLIDE ZONING MAP SCALES AND DESCRIPTORS FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY, HAZARD AND RISK ZONING.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake-Triggered Landslides in Southwest China
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 351–363, 2012 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/12/351/2012/ Natural Hazards doi:10.5194/nhess-12-351-2012 and Earth © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. System Sciences Earthquake-triggered landslides in southwest China X. L. Chen, Q. Zhou, H. Ran, and R. Dong Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Volcano, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, 100029, China Correspondence to: X. L. Chen ([email protected]) Received: 31 May 2011 – Revised: 4 November 2011 – Accepted: 14 December 2011 – Published: 17 February 2012 Abstract. Southwest China is located in the southeastern ities were due to landslides triggered by the shaking (Yin et margin of the Tibetan Plateau and it is a region of high seis- al., 2009; Zhang, 2009). Different from the landslides caused mic activity. Historically, strong earthquakes that occurred by rainfall, earthquake-triggered landslides can take place in here usually generated lots of landslides and brought de- a comparatively wider region, and sometimes they are the structive damages. This paper introduces several earthquake- most potentially destructive amongst the secondary geotech- triggered landslide events in this region and describes their nical hazard associated with earthquakes. These large and characteristics. Also, the historical data of earthquakes with widely distributed landslides usually cannot be prevented by a magnitude of 7.0 or greater, having occurred in this region, current mitigating measures, nor can the regular measures is collected and the relationship between the affected area used to monitor or predict rainfall-triggered landslides. In- of landslides and earthquake magnitude is analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analytical Method in Geomechanics
    The Analytical Method in 1 A. P. S. Selvadurai Geomechanics Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, This article presents an overview of the application of analytical methods in the theories McGill University, of elasticity, poroelasticity, flow, and transport in porous media and plasticity to the 817 Sherbrooke Street West, solution of boundary value problems and initial boundary value problems of interest to Montreal, QC, H3A 2K6 Canada geomechanics. The paper demonstrates the role of the analytical method in geomechanics e-mail: [email protected] in providing useful results that have practical importance, pedagogic value, and serve as benchmarking tools for calibrating computational methodologies that are ultimately used for solving more complex practical problems in geomechanics. There are 315 references cited in this article. ͓DOI: 10.1115/1.2730845͔ The development of classical soil mechanics and geomechanics bedded structures, stability and failure of soils, flow in porous owes a great deal to the availability and utilization of theoretical media, and consolidation and creep of soils. results in elasticity, plasticity, poroelasticity, and flow and trans- The analytical method has always played an important role not port in porous media. As the discipline evolves to encompass only as a component of the educational enterprise in geomechan- either new areas of application or the use of new theories of geo- ics but also as a tool for the development of concise results of material behavior, the natural tendency
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Geomechanics: Petroleum Geomechanical Engineering in field Development Planning
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 The geology of geomechanics: petroleum geomechanical engineering in field development planning M. A. ADDIS Rockfield Software Ltd, Ethos, Kings Road, Swansea Waterfront SA1 8AS, UK Tony.Addis@rockfieldglobal.com Abstract: The application of geomechanics to oil and gas field development leads to significant improvements in the economic performance of the asset. The geomechanical issues that affect field development start at the exploration stage and continue to affect appraisal and development decisions all the way through to field abandonment. Field developments now use improved static reservoir characterization, which includes both the mechanical properties of the field and the initial stress distribution over the field, along with numerical reservoir modelling to assess the dynamic stress evolution that accompanies oil and gas production, or fluid injection, into the reservoirs. Characterizing large volumes of rock in the subsurface for geomechanical analysis is accompa- nied by uncertainty resulting from the low core sampling rates of around 1 part per trillion (ppt) for geomechanical properties and due to the remote geophysical and petrophysical techniques used to construct field models. However, some uncertainties also result from theoretical simplifications used to describe the geomechanical behaviour of the geology. This paper provides a brief overview of geomechanical engineering applied to petroleum field developments. Select case studies are used to highlight how detailed geological knowledge improves the geomechanical characterization and analysis of field developments. The first case study investigates the stress regimes present in active fault systems and re-evaluates the industry’s interpretation of Andersonian stress states of faulting.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Opportunities for Machine Learning Methods in Underground Rock Engineering Design
    geosciences Review An Overview of Opportunities for Machine Learning Methods in Underground Rock Engineering Design Josephine Morgenroth, Usman T. Khan * and Matthew A. Perras Department of Civil Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada; [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (M.A.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 November 2019; Accepted: 28 November 2019; Published: 2 December 2019 Abstract: Machine learning methods for data processing are gaining momentum in many geoscience industries. This includes the mining industry, where machine learning is primarily being applied to autonomously driven vehicles such as haul trucks, and ore body and resource delineation. However, the development of machine learning applications in rock engineering literature is relatively recent, despite being widely used and generally accepted for decades in other risk assessment-type design areas, such as flood forecasting. Operating mines and underground infrastructure projects collect more instrumentation data than ever before, however, only a small fraction of the useful information is typically extracted for rock engineering design, and there is often insufficient time to investigate complex rock mass phenomena in detail. This paper presents a summary of current practice in rock engineering design, as well as a review of literature and methods at the intersection of machine learning and rock engineering. It identifies gaps, such as standards for architecture, input selection and performance metrics, and areas for future work. These gaps present an opportunity to define a framework for integrating machine learning into conventional rock engineering design methodologies to make them more rigorous and reliable in predicting probable underlying physical mechanics and phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Rock Mechanics and Mining Engineering 1.1 General Concepts
    1. Rock Mechanics and mining engineering 1.1 General concepts • Rock mechanics is the theoretical and applied science of the mechanical behavior of rock and rock masses; it is that branch of mechanics concerned with the response of rock and rock masses to the force fields of their physical environment. By US National Committee on Rock Mechanics (1964 & 1974) 1.1 General concepts • Geomechanics is the application of engineering and geological principles to the behavior of the ground and ground water and the use of these principles in civil, mining, offshore and environmental engineering in the widest sense. By the Australian Geomechanics Society 1.1 General concepts • Geotechnical engineering is the application of the sciences of soil mechanics and rock mechanics, engineering geology and other related disciples to civil engineering construction, the extractive industries and the preservation and enhancement of the environment. By Anon (1999) 1.1 General concepts • Application of rock mechanics to (underground) mine engineering : premises 1) a rock mass can be ascribed a set of mechanical properties which can be measured in standard test or estimated using well-established techniques. 2) the process of underground mining generates a rock structure consisting of voids, support elements and abutment; mechanical performance of the structure is amenable to analysis using the principles of classical mechanics. 1.1 General concepts 3) the capacity to predict and control the mechanical performance of the host rock mass in which mining proceeds
    [Show full text]
  • Geomechanics Challenges and Its Future Direction – Food for Thought*
    Geomechanics Challenges and its Future Direction – Food for Thought* F. T. Suorineni Suorineni F. T. (2013), “Geomechanics Challenges and its Future Direction – Food for Thought”, Ghana Mining Journal, pp. 14 - 20. Abstract Geomechanics has proven to be the backbone of safe and cost effective mining practice. However, experience shows it still does not have the appreciation of most mine managements until there is a fatality or costly ore sterilization. The problem can be traced back to the training of mining engineers. The subject is also picked up later in life by other professionals with limited background in geology. The consequences of these limitations are lack of fundamental knowledge in the subject by some who practice it. This lack of understanding has affected the growth and maturity of the subject of rock mechanics, a key component of geomechanics. Today, we are beginning to understand that failure criteria that were inherited from soil mechanics for appli- cation to rock are wrong and misleading. Despite these problems, some major achievements have been made towards a better understanding of rock behavior under load. Many more challenges still lie ahead. This paper takes a look at the history of rock mechanics, and therefore geomechanics, its development, required training, present status and what lies ahead in the future. The goal is to provide educators, industry and practicing engineers what it takes to be a good rock engineer and the real benefits of the subject for the good of society. 1 Introduction was in 1963 Professor Bjerrum, from Norway, speaking on behalf of A. Casagrande (President of Even the definition of geomechanics is confusing.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Faculty of Engineering - Papers (Archive) Sciences 1-1-2007 Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning Phillip N. Flentje University of Wollongong, [email protected] Anthony Miner University of Wollongong, [email protected] Graham Whitt Shire of Yarra Ranges, [email protected] Robin Fell University of New South Wales, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers Part of the Engineering Commons https://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/2823 Recommended Citation Flentje, Phillip N.; Miner, Anthony; Whitt, Graham; and Fell, Robin: Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning 2007, 13-36. https://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/2823 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Extract from Australian Geomechanics Journal and News of the Australian Geomechanics Society Volume 42 No 1 March 2007 Extract containing: “Guideline for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning” Ref: AGS (2007a) Landslide Risk Management ISSN 0818-9110 GUIDELINE FOR LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY, HAZARD AND RISK ZONING FOR LAND USE PLANNING Australian Geomechanics Society Landslide Zoning Working Group TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]