British Columbia Timber Sales, Chinook B

British Columbia Timber Sales Chinook Business Area

Forest Stewardship Plan

Chilliwack Forest District B.C. Timber Sales

2007 Original Prepared by:

Guy Fried, RPF Planning Forester, Chilliwack E-mail: [email protected]

2014 update prepared by:

Enrique Sanchez, RPF BCTS Planning Forester Email: [email protected]

Multi-use Management

British Columbia Timber Sales, Chinook Business Area 46360 Airport Road Chilliwack, BC V2P 1A5 Web address: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/bcts/areas/TCH.htm Email:[email protected]

Page 2 of 104

Signatures of Persons Required to Prepare the Plan

The BCTS Timber Sales Manager has entered into an agreement with the plan holders indicated below and signs this plan on their behalf:

• Leq'a:mel Forestry Limited Partnership • Cascade Lower Canyon Community Forest General Partnership Corp. • Matsqui First Nation Development Corporation, or Matsqui First Nation Development Limited Partnership. • Shxw'owhamel Ventures Ltd. • Yale First Nation British Columbia Timber Sales - Chinook Business Area

46360 Airport Road Chilliwack, BC V2P 1A5

Phone: (604) 702-5700 Fax: (604) 702-5711

Preparing Forester

46360 Airport Road Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 1A5

Date: ~~. 70 () I ~

Page 3 of 104 Blank Page

Page 4 of 104

Table of Contents

Signatures of Persons Required to Prepare the Plan ...... 3 Table of Contents ...... 5 INTRODUCTION ...... 7 1 Interpretations ...... 8 1.1 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...... 8 1.2 TERM OF THE FSP ...... 9 1.3 FOREST DEVELOPMENT UNITS ...... 9 PROFESSIONAL RELIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY ...... 9 SITE PLANS AND STANDARD UNITS ...... 9 CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE AND OVERLAPPING FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLANS ...... 10 2 RESULTS or STRATEGIES ...... 16 2.1 SOILS: ...... 16 2.2 TIMBER: ...... 17 2.3 WILDLIFE: ...... 18 2.4 WATER: ...... 19 2.5 FISH: ...... 20 2.6 BIODIVERSITY: ...... 20 2.7 CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES: ...... 22 2.8 RECREATION RESOURCES: ...... 23 2.9 VISUAL QUALITY: ...... 24 3 ADDITIONAL FSP INFORMATION ...... 25 3.1 PROTECTION OF CUT BLOCKS AND ROADS FROM AN FDP TO AN FSP: ...... 25 Timber Sale Licenses (TSL), Licence/CP in Effect: ...... 27 3.2 STOCKING STANDARDS (SEE APPENDIX A): ...... 28 3.3 MEASURES TO PREVENT THE INTRODUCTION & SPREAD OF INVASIVE PLANTS: ...... 29 3.4 NATURAL RANGE BARRIERS: ...... 30 Appendix A: Stocking Standards: ...... 31 Appendix B FSP Maps, FDU & Declared Areas ...... 41 Table B2: FSP Maps: ...... 41 Table B3: Forest Development Units: ...... 42 Table B4: Declared Areas: ...... 43 Table B5: Road Permits in Effect...... 45 Appendix C: Biodiversity Legal Objectives Orders ...... 46 Appendix D: ...... 97 RECREATION TRAILS AND INTERPRETATIVE FOREST OBJECTIVES ...... 97 Appendix E: ...... 99 DM LETTERS DEFINING SCENIC AREAS IN THE CHILLIWACK DISTRICT ...... 99 Appendix F: ...... 101 VISUAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES IN THE MISSION TREE FARM LICENCE (MTFL) FDU ...... 101

Page 5 of 104

Blank page

Page 6 of 104

INTRODUCTION This Forest Stewardship Plan (FSP) has been prepared in accordance with the Forest and Range Practices Act (FPPR) as well as additional associated provincial and federal legislation.for the use of the British Columbia Timber Sales, Chinook Business Area, Leq’a:mel Forestry Limited Partnership, Cascade Lower Canyon Community Forest General Partnership Corp, Matsqui Development Corporation, Shxw’owhamel Ventures Ltd, and Yale First Nations. The purpose of the FSP is to outline objectives set forth by the Government of British Columbia related to forest management activities proposed on crown lands. The achievement of the objectives, established within the FSP, is measured through results, strategies and/or measures. The intention of the objectives is to identify the strategic issues by describing a desired future condition for a particular resource or resource use, while results, strategies and/or measures describe how the desired outcome will be achieve.  A result is defined in the FPPR as a “description of measurable or verifiable outcomes in respect of a particular established objective, and the situations or circumstances that determine where in a Forest Development Unit (FDU) the outcomes will be applied.”  A strategy is defined in the FPPR as a “description of measurable or verifiable steps or practices that will be carried out in respect of a particular established objective, and the situations or circumstances that determine where in a FDU the steps or practices will be applied.” This FSP, where applicable, embraces and outlines measurable and verifiable results, strategies and/or measures that are compatible with government established forest management and resource objectives. Harvesting rights and apportionement as the time of this submission are: License # Licensee Management Unit AAC BCTS Fraser TSA 246,745 m3 BCTS TFL-26 1,602 m3 A79504 Leq’a:mel Forestry Limited Fraser TSA 9,112 m3 Partnership K3J Cascade Lower Canyon K3J 30,900 m3 Community Forest General Partnership Corp. A84106  Matsqui First Nation Fraser TSA 6,316 m3 Development Corporation, or  Matsqui First Nation Development Limited Partnership. A91368 Shxw’owhamel Ventures Ltd Fraser TSA 4,240 m3 A79507 Yale First Nation Fraser TSA 4,180 m3 The Licensee’s referred to in this FSP are the signatories of the FSP. These licensees are from this point forward known in this document as ‘holder(s) of the plan.”

Page 7 of 104

1 Interpretations 1.1 Definitions and Abbreviations

In this FSP: CHC-2001 means Chinook Chilliwack – Results/Strategy or Measure reference number “CP” means Cutting Permit “Extremely High Risk to Invasive Plants” To stop the spread of invasive plants threatening currently un-infested, highly susceptible areas. These sites are less than or equal to 0.25 ha and there is a good expectation of control. These sites are isolated geographically from the main body of the infestation (IAP Reference Guide, page 23).

http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hra/Publications/invasive_plants/IAPP_Reference_Guide/obsolete-1.4-IAP- ReferenceGuide-V5.1.pdf “FDU” means forest development unit under this FSP; “FPC” means the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act RSBD 1996, c 159; “FPPR” means the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation BC Reg 14/2004; “FRPA” means the Forest and Range Practices Act SBC 2002, c.69; “FSP” means forest stewardship plan; “GAR” means the Government Action Regulation. BC Reg 582/2004, as amended from time to time. “High Risk to Invasive Plants” To stop the enlargement of sites in highly susceptible areas. These sites are less than or equal to 0.5 ha. Must have a reasonably good expectation of control. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hra/Publications/invasive_plants/IAPP_Reference_Guide/obsolete-1.4-IAP- ReferenceGuide-V5.1.pdf “MTFL”: refers to Mission Tree Farm License; TFL 26 “RP” means road permit; “TSL” means timber sale license; “TSM” means Timber Sales Manager for the BC Timber Sales Chinook Business Area “Visual Sensitivity Unit” for visual polygons within the MTFL equate to the term ‘polygon number’ in relation to visual polygons within the TSA; “WHA” means Wildlife Habitat Area.

Page 8 of 104

1.2 Term of the FSP

The term of the FSP is five (5) years commencing on the date of approval by the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations.

1.3 Forest Development Units

The FSP maps and Figure #1 show the boundaries of the Forest Development Units (FDU) to which the FSP Objectives, Strategies and/or Results are applicable. The FDU’s are broad geographical units identified in the FSP, which indicate where timber harvesting and road construction may occur during the term of the plan. This FSP is consistent with the timber harvesting rights granted by government for the management units as indicated above.

Appendix B table B2 includes a list of FSP maps included in the submission. Table B3 clarifies where FDU’s cover landscape units or chart area(s), as well as, the approval status of each FDU.

Professional Reliance and Accountability

The Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act (FPC) provided a regulatory framework for conducting forest management activities on crown lands. With the introduction of the FRPA, the Government of British Columbia has now mandated a move away from the regulatory and prescriptive environment to one that supports a results-based regime. This change in philosophy involves a greater role for forestry professionals from a variety of disciplines in regards to professional reliance and accountability. The Plan Holders recognize this management shift, and will endeavor to employ qualified persons/professionals, in their respective fields of practice, where applicable and warranted. Although FRPA is silent on the use of professionals, the engagement of the qualified professionals will primarily take place during the preparation of the Site Plan, and supporting assessments, in order to provide a suitable level of due diligence in conducting forestry activities related to exercizing timber harvesting rights.

Site Plans and Standard Units

As described in Section 10 of the FRPA and Section 34 of the FPPR, the holder of a FSP must prepare a site plan in accordance with the prescribed requirements for any cut block and road prior to the commencement of timber harvesting or road construction. The purpose of the site plan document is to identify the approximate location of the cut block(s) and road(s), must be consistent with the FSP, FRPA and the regulations, and describe how the results and strategies contained within the FSP apply to the area. The site plan must also outline the standard units for the area, the soil disturbance limits and the stocking standards required to establish a free growing stand.

Although approval from government agencies is not required, the site plan is the basic operational plan that encompasses and balances all resource features and values. Standard units within the site plan indicate areas that generally possess

Page 9 of 104

uniformity in ecological characteristics, and result in similar silviculture management through the application of a stocking standard.

Cumulative Effect of Multiple and Overlapping Forest Stewardship Plans

The Plan Holders will endeavor to work cooperatively with other tenure holders operating with the Forest Development Units described within this document.

Page 10 of 104

Figure 1: FSP Overview Map - showing the extent of the Forest Development Units.

The FSP identifies (map or tables) the cut blocks and roads from previous Forest Development Plans (FDPs) that are considered approved under Sec. 196 of the FRPA. Other cut blocks and roads that may be indicated are for reference purposes only. Areas excluded from the FDUs are areas such as Indian reserves, woodlots, private land, provincial and federal parks as well as any other area where commercial harvesting is excluded.

The FSP identifies for the FDUs the designations and other items listed as per Section 14 (3) of the FPPR as noted in the following table:

Table 1: Designations in Effect Designation FDU Date Designated s.14(3)(a) Ungulate Winter Range Anderson, Big Silver, Chehalis, Coquihalla, Mountain Goat East Chilliwack Valley, March 10, 2009  WHA Order # U-2-001 East Harrison, Hatzic-1, Nahatlatch, Silverhope, Spuzzum, Stave & Yale Anderson, Big Silver, Chehalis, Coquihalla, Mule & Black-tailed Deer Depot, East Chilliwack Valley, East Harrison, September 22, 2009  WHA Order # U-2-006 Nahatlatch, Silverhope, Spuzzum, Stave, Stoyama & Yale

s.14(3)(b) Wildlife Habitat Areas Coastal Giant Salamander East Chilliwack Valley,  WHA # 2-120 to 2-128, 2-130 to 2-138, Elk & Vedder August 24, 2007 2-148 & 2-149 Order Grizzly Bear (63 WHAs)  WHA # 2-099, 2-100, 2-101, 2-102 & 2- Nahatlatch and March 17, 2005 194 Order # 1. Silverhope March 17, 2005  WHA # 2-109, 2-112, 2-114, 2-118, 2- Coquihalla and 119, 2-195, 2-196, 2-197,2-198, 2-199, Silverhope 2-201, 2-202 & 2-203 Order # 2.  WHA 2-097, 2-098, 2-105 to 2-107, 2- Big Silver, Coquihalla, September 16, 2010 111, 2-113, 2-116 & 2-372 to 2-380 East Harrison, Spuzzum & Yale Order # 3.  WHA # 2-407 to 2-434 Order # 4. Big Silver, Nahatlatch & March 8, 2011 Spuzzum Mountain Beaver Silverhope September 13, 2001  WHA # 2-012 Order Pacific Water Shrew East Chilliwack Valley & August 24, 2007  WHA # 2-140, 2-144 & 2-147 Order Vedder Pacific Tailed Frog Mowhokam Creek April 1st, 2014  WHA # 2-511, 2-512 & 2-513 Order Anderson, Big Silver, Chehalis, Coquihalla, Depot, East Chilliwack Spotted Owl Valley, East Harrison, March 1, 2011  WHA # 2-494 to 2-510 Order # 1. Elk, Hatzic-1, Liumchen, McGuire, Nahatlatch, Silverdaisy, Silverhope, Spuzzum & Yale Tall Bugbane  WHA # 2-129, 2-139, 2-141 to 2-143, 2- Vedder August 24, 2007 145 & 2-146 Order # 1. Designation FDU Date Designated s.14(3)(c) Fisheries Sensitive Watersheds None in Effect N/A N/A s.14(3)(d) Lakeshore Management Zone None in Effect N/A N/A s.14(3)(e) Scenic Areas Visual Areas Defined by DM for TSA Applicable FDU’s October 1, 1999 (Est.)

Visual Quality Objectives Continued Applicable FDU’s October 17, 2005 s.14(3)(f) Lake Identified as an L1 Lake None in Effect N/A N/A s.14(3)(g) Community Watersheds Adams Spring Community Watershed Applicable FDU May 14, 2004 Ascaphus Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Byers Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Cable Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Campsite Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Cannell Lake Watershed Applicable FDU 2004 Capilano Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Carkner Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Centre Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Choate Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Cohen Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Coutlie Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Cupola Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Deiner Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Deroche Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Dorman Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Doyle Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Drachmann Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Dunville Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Dutchman Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Eddy Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Edmeston Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Edna Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Elbow Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Elk Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Engineers Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Explosives Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Fin Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Flapjack Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Guild Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Gurney Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Hallisey Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995

Page 13 of 104

Designation FDU Date Designated

Honeymoon Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Ichilaka Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Inkawthia Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Jamieson Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Josephine Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Kathryn Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Kenworthy Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Knox Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Kopp Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Macsween Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Malkin Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Mckay Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Montizambert Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Mossom Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Nelson Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Nevin Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Norrish Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 One & One Quarter Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Optimist Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Or Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Pickney Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Sandstone Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Sasquatch Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Schkam Lake Community Watershed Applicable FDU May 14, 2004 Service Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Seymour Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Skeemis Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Southbright Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Spring Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Stormy Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Stoyoma Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Sunshine Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Terminal Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Thunderbird Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Trite Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Two Mile Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Viking Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Volkert Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Watt Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Wells Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Yale Community Watershed Applicable FDU June 15, 1995 Young Creek Community Watershed Applicable FDU May 14, 2004

FDU where Order Date Map Established Established Designation Order Designated or Updated Objective 1. Objective 2. Applies Amended s.14(3)(h) Old Growth Management Areas (Landscape Unit) Ainsle Applicable December FDU’s January 13, 2004 11, 2003 Yes Yes

Page 14 of 104

FDU where Order Date Map Established Established Designation Order Designated or Updated Objective 1. Objective 2. Applies Amended Alouette Applicable February 14, February 4, FDU’s 2013 2013 Yes No Anderson Applicable December FDU’s January 13, 2004 11, 2003 Yes Yes Big Silver Applicable December 16, April 30, FDU’s 2010 2010 Yes Yes Chehalis April 30, Chehalis March 15, 2006 2010 Yes Yes Chilliwack, Applicable December FDU’s June 24, 2005 2, 2004 Yes Yes Coquihalla Applicable April 30, FDU’s April 14, 2004 2010 Yes Yes East Harrison Applicable December 16, April 30, FDU’s 2010 2010 Yes Yes Fraser Valley Applicable February 14, February 4, South FDU’s 2013 2013 Yes No Hatzic Applicable February 14, February 4, FDU’s 2013 2013 Yes No Manning Applicable July 12, FDU’s April 14, 2004 2007 Yes Yes Mehatl Applicable December FDU’s January 13, 2004 11, 2003 Yes Yes Nahatlatch Applicable April 30, FDU’s January 13, 2004 2010 Yes Yes Silverhope Applicable March 10, FDU’s April 14, 2004 2004 Yes Yes Spuzzum Applicable December FDU’s January 13, 2004 11, 2003 Yes Yes Stave Applicable February 14, February 4, FDU’s 2013 2013 Yes No Tretheway Applicable April 30, FDU’s June 24, 2005 2010 Yes Yes West Harrison Applicable April 30, FDU’s June 24, 2005 2010 Yes Yes Yale December Yale February 3, 2005 17, 2007 Yes Yes

Designation FDU Date Ending s.14(3)(i) Prohibited Timber Harvesting by Enactment As shown on the attached FSP Map(s) Yale Designated Area 3 Yale December 13, 2015 http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/forest/faregs/Yale3/index.htm

Page 15 of 104

Designations made under:

Designation FDU Date Designated

GAR s.7(1)and (2) Scenic Areas & Visual Quality

Objectives Revised VQOs and Scenic Areas Applicable FDU April 18, 2013

FRPA s.56(1) Interpretive Forest Site Mission Interpretive Forest MTFL FDU October 6, 2011

FRPA s.56(1) Recreation Sites & Trails Recreation Trails Chilliwack River Valley Chilliwack FDU October 10, 2012

The FSP identifies in Section 3 and/or on the map(s) the areas within each FDU that are subject to TSL or RP granted or entered into by the Timber Sales Manager as well as CP and RP issued to the other holders of the plan.

2 RESULTS or STRATEGIES

This section specifies the results or strategies in relation to established objectives applicable to identified FDUs.

2.1 Soils:

2.1.1 Relevant established objectives

Section 5 and 12.2 of the FPPR.

2.1.2 Result or Strategy

FSP Results / Strategies Reference # FDU Result or Strategy

CHC-2000 All (1) The holder of the plan will adopt Section 35a and 36b of the FPPR as a result a Soil disturbance or strategy in respect to primary forest activities carried out by the holder of the limits b plan during the term of this plan. Permanent access structure limits (2) The TSM will notify each holder of a timber sale licence or road permit to a b which the plan relates that Section 35 and 36 of the FPPR apply to the holder’s primary forest activities carried out during the term of the plan.

Page 16 of 104

2.2 Timber:

2.2.1 Relevant established objectives

Section 6 of the FPPR.

2.2.2 No results or strategies required

Under section 12 (8) of the FPPR, the holder of the plan is exempt from the requirement to prepare results or strategies for an objective set by government for timber.

Page 17 of 104

2.3 Wildlife:

2.3.1 Relevant established objectives

Section 7(1), 8, 9, 9.1 of the FPPR.

2.3.2 Result or Strategy

FSP Results / Strategies FDU Result or Strategy Reference #

Species at Risk CHC-2002 Applicable Pacific Water Shrew (PWS) (Sorex bendirii): FDU(s) In respect of the Notice entitled “Indicators of the amount, distribution and attributes of wildlife habitat required for the survival of species at risk in the Chilliwack Forest District” dated December 2004. The holder of the plan will:

(1) manage the applicable, approved, Wildlive Habitat Areas (WHA)’s, identified on the Forest Stewardship Plan Map(s), according to Schedule #1 (General Wildlife Measures) of the Order that established WHAs # 2-140, 2-144 & 2-147. (2) until such time the Notice “Indicators of the amount, distribution and attributes of wildlife habitat required for the survival of species at risk in the Chilliwack Forest District” dated December 2004” is no longer in effect, collaborate with the minister in charge of the administration of the Wildlife Act, to meet the requirements of the Notice, provided that PWS is known to inhabit the area and the amount of habitat has not been met to date. (3) retain a Qualified Professional to provide guidance when there is potential for PWS to exist before completing forest activities development. Any recommendation will be considered and the Site Plans will reflect how they have been addressed.

None At (A) Survival of Regionally Important Wildlife This Time The Ministry responsible for the Wildlife Act has not identified regionally important wildlife within the Forest Development Units covered by this FSP.

In addition to the strategies or results provided in this section, some of the strategies or results in other sections also relate to Wildlife: CHC-2009 and CHC-2011 (see Section 2.4 – Water) and CHC-2012 to CHC-2015 (except CHC-2014) (see Section 2.6 - Biodiversity)

Page 18 of 104

2.4 Water:

2.4.1 Relevant established objectives Section 8, 8.2, 12(3), and 12.3 of the FPPR.

2.4.2 Result or Strategy

FSP Results / Strategies FDU Result or Strategy Reference #

CHC-2009 All (1) The holder of the plan will adopt sections 47a to 51b, 52(2) c and 53d of the a) riparian class FPPR as a result or strategy in respect to primary forest activities carried out b)RRZ restrictions c)trees in RMZ by the timber sales manager during the term of this plan. d) temp sensitive (2) The TSM will notify each holder of a timber sale licence or road permit to streams which the plan relates that Sections 47 to 51, 52(2) and 53 of the FPPR apply to the holder’s primary forest activities carried out during the term of the plan. CHC-2010 All (1) Prior to conducting primary forest activities within a community watershed to which section 8.2 of the FPPR applies, the holder of the plan will: (a) In conjunction with other potentially affected forest agreement holders, and preceding the commencement of primary forest activities, engage a qualified professional to conduct a Hydrologic Assessment for the community watershed in which the activities are proposed. Subsequent assessments will be conducted at least once every 5 years, unless no primary forest activities have occurred or determined otherwise by a qualified professional(s). (b) Ensure that the hydrological assessment considers potential impacts on water quality, water quantity, including risks to public health, and timing of water flows (c) Engage a qualified professional to conduct a Terrain Stability Field Assessment (TSFA) for potential primary forest activities within a community watershed that overlap with terrain mapped as Class IV or V; or that overlap with terrain that has slope gradients greater than 60%. (d) Ensure that planned primary forest activities are designed and implemented to be consistent with the results and recommendations in the Hydrologic Assessment and, if required, the Terrain Stability Field Assessment. CHC-2011 All (1) In respect to sections 8 and 12 (3) of the FPPR, to address retention of trees in a riparian management zone, the holder of the plan will: (a) ensure that retention levels within Riparian Management Zones (RMZs) are determined by a qualified professional through a riparian assessment that considers all factors listed in Schedule 1(2) of the FPPR, and (b) design cutblocks and roads in a manner that is consistent with the retention levels as determined by the qualified professional as described in (a).

Page 19 of 104

2.5 Fish:

2.5.1 Relevant established objectives

Section 8 of the FPPR.

2.5.2 Result or Strategy Consistency with the objective for fish within riparian areas is achieved through results and strategies that are provided in other sections within this FSP as per:

CHC-2009 to CHC-2011 (see Section 2.4 –Water)

Therefore, there are no additional results and/or strategies that specifically relate to this established objective.

2.6 Biodiversity:

2.6.1 Relevant established objectives Objectives that are continued under sections 93.4 of the Land Act or set out in Sections 8, 9, 9.1, 12.4, and 12.5 of the FPPR.

2.6.2 Result or Strategy

FSP Results / Strategies FDU Result or Strategy Reference #

CHC-2012 All (1) The holder of the plan will adopt sections 64a, and 65b of the FPPR as a a) max cutblock result or strategy in respect of cut blocks within which the holder of the size b) adjacency plan carries out or authorizes timber harvesting.

(2) The TSM will notify each holder of a timber sale licence or road permit to which the plan relates that Sections 64 and 65 of the FPPR apply to the holder’s primary forest activities carried out during the term of the plan. CHC-2012a Alouette, (1) The holder of the plan will adopt section 66d and 67c of the FPPR as a c)harvest restriction result or strategy in respect to wildlife tree retention. d) WTR Fraser Valley South, (2) The TSM will notify each holder of a timber sale licence or road permit to Hatzic and which the plan relates that Sections 66 and 67of the FPPR apply to the holder’s primary forest activities carried out during the term of the plan. Stave

Page 20 of 104

FSP Results / FDU Strategies Result or Strategy Reference # CHC-2013 Ainslie, In respect of the “Order to Establish A Landscape Unit and Objectives”, Anderson, the holder of the plan will manage landscape level biological diversity and Big Silver, stand level structural diversity by: Chehalis, Chilliwack, (a) designing cut blocks and roads in a manner that is consistent with Coquihalla, Objectives One and Two of the Order, (refer to Appendix C for each East Objective by LU), Harrison, (b) carrying out forest practices only if the forest practices are Manning, consistent with the design for the cut block or road referred to in Mehatl, paragraph (a), and, Nahatlatch, Silverhope, (c) in the case of BCTS only, entering into a timber sale licence, Spuzzum, granting a road permit or applying for a cutting permit only if the Tretheway, license or permit is consistent with the design for the cut block or West road referred to in (a). Harrison, and Yale CHC-2015 Alouette, In respect of the “Ministerial Order,dated February 4, 2013, to Establish A Fraser Landscape Unit and Objectives”, the holder of the plan will manage Valley landscape level biological diversity by: South, Hatzic and (a) designing cut blocks and roads in a manner that is consistent with Objectives of the Ministerial Order, (refer to Appendix C for each Stave Objective by LU), (b) carrying out forest practices only if the forest practices are consistent with the design for the cut block or road referred to in paragraph (a), and, (c) in the case of BCTS only, entering into a timber sale licence, granting a road permit or applying for a cutting permit only if the license or permit is consistent with the design for the cut block or road referred to in (a).

Consistency with the objective for biodiversity within riparian areas is achieved through results and strategies that are provided in other sections within this FSP:

CHC – 2000: Soils CHC – 2002: Wildlife CHC – 2009 to CHC – 2011: Water

Page 21 of 104

2.7 Cultural Heritage Resources:

2.7.1 Relevant established objectives Section 10 of the FPPR.

2.7.2 Result or Strategy

FSP Results / Strategies FDU Result or Strategy Reference #

CHC-2016 All (1) Subsections (2) to (6) apply to cultural heritage resources to which the objective in section 10 of the FPPR relates.

(2) The holder of the plan will annually refer to applicable First Nations, areas identified for potential timber harvesting and road construction, if any, and request information respecting cultural heritage resources within the identified areas.

(3) The holder of the plan will evaluate the nature and extent of possible site- specific cultural heritage resources identified within areas of potential timber harvesting and road construction activities, including making reasonable efforts to share information or consult with the applicable First Nation.

(4) The holder of the plan, when designing a cut block or road, will identify (a) the portion of the area occupied by the cultural heritage resource,

(b) the nature of the cultural heritage resource, (c) whether the cultural heritage resource is to be protected or conserved, and (d) if the cultural heritage resource is to be conserved, what constraints, if any, are to apply to the forest practices carried out on the area.

(5) For each cultural heritage resource that has been identified under subsection (4) for protection, the holder of the plan will carry out or authorize a forest practice only to the extent that the forest practice does not damage or render ineffective the cultural heritage resource.

(6) For each cultural heritage resource that has been identified under subsection (4) for being conserved, the holder of the plan will carry out or authorize a forest practice only to the extent that the forest practice is consistent with the constraints, if any, specified in the design for the cutblock or road

In addition to the results or strategies provided in this section, some of the results or strategies in other sections also relate to cultural heritage: CHC – 2002 (see Section 2.3 –Wildlife); CHC-2009 and 2011 (see Section 2.4 –Water); CHC- 2012 to 2015 (except CHC-2014), (see Section 2.6 –Biodiversity) and CHC-2019 (see Section 3.3 –Invasive Plants)

Page 22 of 104

2.8 Recreation Resources:

2.8.1 Relevant established objectives Section 56 of FRPA.

FSP Results / Strategies FDU Result or Strategy Reference # CHC-2017 Applicab The Regional Manager for the Coast Recreation Region, under Section 56 of the th le FRPA, on October 10 , 2012, established objectives for the following Recreation FDU(s) Trails:

Baby Munday Mount McGuire Vedder Mountain Elk-Thurston Mount Rexford Williams Peak Ford Mountain Pierce Lake Williamson Lake Ling Lake Slesse Memorial Mount Cheam Slesse Mountain

In respect of the established objectives for these trails, the holder of the plan will:

1. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking through a forested and sub-alpine setting by: (a) Ensuring primary forest activities are designed and implemented to follow the targets/actions described in the ‘Guidance Document for Established Trails with Legal Objectives in the Chilliwack River Valley’ as provided by the Chilliwack Forest District Recreation Officer. For reference, this document is provided in Appendix D. (b) Obtaining recommendations from the Chilliwack Forest District Recreation Officer, should primary forest activities vary from the targets/actions as described in the ‘Guidance Document for Established Trails with Legal Objectives in the Chilliwack River Valley.’ (c) implement the recommendations in (b), unless there is a conflict with other legal commitments.

2. Avoid building access structures over the established recreation trail unless no other practicable alternative exists.

3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail. The Chilliwack Forest District Recreation Officer will be consulted for guidance on access prevention measures. CHC- MTFL Under the authority of Section 56(1) of the Forest and Range Practices Act, the 2017a Regional Manager for the Coast Recreation Region established objectives on October 6, 2011 for the Mission Interpretive Forest Site (MIF)

In respect of the established objectives for this Interpretive Forest Site, when BCTS plans to develop its apportionment in TFL-26, and it falls within the boundaries of the MIF, it will work collaboratively with the District of Mission to develop primary forest activities ensuring they are designed and implemented consistent with “Recreation Master Plan for the MIF.”

Page 23 of 104

2.9 Visual Quality:

2.9.1 Relevant established objectives Section 17 of GAR.

2.9.2 Result or Strategy

FSP Results / Strategies FDU Result or Strategy Reference # CHC-2018 All (1) The holder of the plan will not carry out or authorize timber harvesting or road construction in a scenic area unless the cutblock or road is consistent with the visual quality objective applicable to the area.

(2) For the purposes of (1) above scenic areas are the areas as defined by the Chilliwack Forest District Manager in a letter to ‘All Licensees’; dated October 1, 1999, and an amendment dated April 12, 2013, coming into effect April 18, 2013. Both letters are found in Appendix E.

(3) For the purposes of (1) above within the Mision Tree Farm Licence (MTFL) FDU the TSM will be consistent with Visual Quality Objectives(VQO) in accordance with Appendix G “Visual Quality Objectives Within TFL 26”. These VQOs are indicated for each Visual Sensitivity Unit in TFL 26.

(4) For the purpose of (1) above the TSM will be consistent with the Order to Revise the Visual Quality Objectives and Scenic Areas within the Fraser Timber Supply Area ,efective April 18, 2013.

Page 24 of 104

3 ADDITIONAL FSP INFORMATION

In addition to the objectives, strategies, and results, there are several other items to be shown or addressed in the FSP, as outlined in sections 3.1 to 3.4.

3.1 Protection of Cut Blocks and Roads from an FDP to an FSP:

Areas which FRPA s 196 (1) or (2) applies are shown on the FSP maps.

Section 196(1) Blocks: Mapsheet TSL Block Designation 92G205 AL511 196(1) 92G305 CE729 196(1) SV311 196(1) WN111_C 196(1) 92H101 A48841 A48841_1 196(1) A56054_A 196(1) CA100 196(1) SC100 196(1) 92H102 A48739_A 196(1) 92H201 A66756 A66756_A 196(1) A84097 CA054 196(1) A88206 HU910 196(1) A51426_A 196(1) A53970_D 196(1) A66347_A 196(1) A66347_B 196(1) HU911 196(1) RU736A 196(1) RU736B 196(1) 92H202 A54042_B 196(1) A56234_ABCDF 196(1) A56246_A 196(1) A56246_B 196(1) A56246_C 196(1) 92H301 A55980 A55980_D 196(1) A86040 SP101 196(1) 92H401 A85023 SP095A 196(1) SP503A 196(1) A49573_C 196(1) A49573_D 196(1) A49573_E 196(1) SP504A 196(1) 92H402 A85628 SP102 196(1) SP105 196(1) A86040 SP103 196(1) 92H501 A49573_A 196(1) A49573_B 196(1) NK993C 196(1)

Page 25 of 104

Section 196(2) Blocks:

Mapsheet TSL Block Designation 92G305 A54326 A54326_A 196(2) A48846_E 196(2) A54092_A 196(2) A54092_D 196(2) A54092_F 196(2) A54092_I 196(2) A54092_J 196(2) A54092_K 196(2) SV140 196(2) SV148 196(2) 92H101 A65289 A65289_A 196(2) A65289_B 196(2) 92H102 A84097 CA102 196(2) SD100 196(2) 92H201 A86588 RU918B 196(2) HU908 196(2) RU918D 196(2) 92H202 A66370 A66370_B 196(2) WB104 196(2) 92H301 A55980 A55980_C 196(2) 92H401 A54326 A54326_C 196(2) A54326_E 196(2) A54326_D 196(2) HN110 196(2) HN111 196(2) HN112 196(2) HN406 196(2) 92H402 A65894 A65894_A 196(2) ST206 196(2) A77023 ST100A 196(2) ST100B 196(2) ST200 196(2) ST940B 196(2) ST940C 196(2) ST940D 196(2) TK104 196(2)

Page 26 of 104

Timber Sale Licenses (TSL), Licence/CP in Effect:

The following is a list of TSL’s and Cutting Permits that are/were in effect at the time of the submission of FSP Amendment.

TSL or Licence/CP In Effect Licencee Geographic Location A77023 BCTS Stoyoma Creek Leq’a:mel Forestry STATLU CREEK A79504 Cp 1. Limited Partnership Leq’a:mel Forestry WAHLEACH LAKE A79504 Cp 2. Limited Partnership A82827 BCTS Depot Creek A83289 BCTS Eight Mile A83293 BCTS American Creek A83901 BCTS Mt. Woodside A83903 BCTS Alouette Lake A83904 BCTS Stave/Winslow A85023 BCTS Spuzzum A85628 BCTS Spuzzum A85998 BCTS Stave Lake A86048 BCTS Kookipi Creek A86208 BCTS Coquihalla/Wray/Berkey A86478 BCTS Nesakwatch A87558 BCTS Wray Creek A87559 BCTS Jones Lake A87655 BCTS West Harrison A88206 BCTS Hunter Creek A88548 BCTS Connor A88550 BCTS Mt. Woodside A88965 BCTS Lorenzetta A89257 BCTS Lost Creek A89317 BCTS Skagit A89440 BCTS Spuzzum Creek A89441 BCTS Hunter Creek A89569 BCTS Centre Creek A89589 BCTS Kookipi Creek A89867 BCTS Alouette Lake A90212 BCTS Liumchen Creek A90213 BCTS Eight Mile Creek A90460 BCTS Lost Creek A90631 BCTS Kookipi Creek A91116 BCTS Lost Creek K3J CP-10 Hope Comm Forest Hope

Page 27 of 104

3.2 Stocking Standards (see Appendix A):

Section 16 of the FPPR states the person preparing a FSP must ensure that the plan specifies where and, situations or circumstances, when a stocking standard will be applied. Stocking standards are the standards developed by the Plan Holders and approved by government that facilitate the establishment of a free growing stand, as required under Section 44 of the FPPR, within standard units described in the site plan. Therefore, stocking standards act to link the site plan to the FSP and set out the legal objectives to be met by the Plan Holders on areas subject to timber harvesting. The situations and the circumstances in which they will be applied are governed by the location of the opening within a biogeoclimatic zone, subzone, variant and site series. The stocking standards provided in Appendix B are applicable to all of the FDU’s described in this FSP.

Additionally, these stocking standards are intended to only address even-aged silviculture systems/forest management activities. When situations occur, in which the Plan Holders determine that it is appropriate to engage in uneven-aged management or the activities listed in Section 44(3)(h) of the FPPR, the Plan Holders will make application and submit for approval a FSP Amendment for a stocking standard that addresses the site specific attributes of the area to which the stocking standard is to apply. The site specific attributes to be considered may include, but are not limited to, tree species composition, stand structural characteristics, diameter classes, basal areas, and volumes.

It is the intention of the Plan Holders to apply Section 44 of the FPPR to all situations where a free growing stand is required to be established under this FSP, and not apply Section 45 of the FPPR.

3.2.1 Stocking Standards Tables

Tables describe the stocking standards that apply on all FDUs are provided in Appendix A. As per Section 16 of FPPR the stocking standards will be applied as per Section 44; that is, on a stand by stand basis.

The stocking standards in this FSP include the following: biogeoclimatic zone, subzone, variant, preferred and acceptable species combination, regeneration dates, minimum free-growing heights, minimum inter-tree distances between well-formed crop trees, and the minimum required target stocking levels at free- growing, and ecological footnotes for each site series that occur within the FSP area.

Page 28 of 104

3.3 Measures to Prevent the Introduction & Spread of Invasive Plants:

FSP Measure FDU Measures to Prevent the Introduction Reference & Spread of Invasive Plants # CHC-2019 All For the purposes of Section 47 of the FRPA, the measures are:

The following measures will be taken by the holder of the plan to prevent the introduction or spread of invasive plants if such introduction or spread is likely to be the result of forest practices carried out under this FSP by the holder of the plan or a Timber Sales Licence Agreement Holder:

(1) On an annual basis, on areas within the FDU, the area of known sitesa of invasive plants, and sites considered as high or extremely high risk to invasive plant establishment through forest practices, will be identified using information gathered from plan holder(s) staff, forest district staff, regional experts, or other agencies. (2) Within sites in subparagraph (1), contiguous areas of exposed mineral soil greater than 0.25 ha in areas of extremely high risk or greater than 0.5 ha in areas of high risk disturbed through a primary forest practice activity that are not to be reforested, will be seeded with grass and legumes within one year of disturbance, with the exclusion of the road surface of active roads or areas of non productive sites, such as, rock and talus. (3) Sites referred to in subparagraph (2) will be monitored over the year following seeding to ensure they are re-vegetated. Sites not re-vegetated will be re-seeded and further monitored. (4) The seed used for the purposes of subparagraph (2) will meet or exceed Canada Common Number 1 Forage Mixture specifications as defined by the Canada Seeds Act. Grass used must be ecologically suitable or compatible to the sites being seeded. a: refers to areas related to primary forestry activities.

CanadaSeeds Act (http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/S-8/ )

Canada Seeds Regulations (HTTP://LAWS-LOIS.JUSTICE.GC.CA/ENG/REGULATIONS/C.R.C.,_C._1400/INDEX.HTML )

Page 29 of 104

3.4 Natural Range Barriers:

Under Section 48 of FRPA and Section 18 of FPPR, the FSP must specify measures to mitigate the effect of removing or rendering ineffective natural range barriers.

FSP Measures Reference FDU Measures #

CHC-2020 Applicable For the purposes of Section 48 of the Act, the measures are FDU(s) (1) The holder(s) of the plan will:

(a) Each year under the term of this FSP, the areas within the applicable FDU(s) that are subject to or adjacent to agreements under the Range Act in respect of grazing of livestock will be updated from information gathered from Ministry of Forests, lands and Natural Resource Operations’ district, range staff, or regional experts; (b) Inform each affected holder of an agreement under the Range Act of planned harvest and road construction within or adjacent to their agreement; (c) Where the affected holder of an agreement under the Range Act indicates that the planned harvest and road construction will remove or render ineffective a natural range barrier, the holder of the plan will carry out reasonable measures to mitigate the effect of the removal or ineffectiveness. (d) The TSM will notify each holder of a timber sale license or road permit of the necessary mitigative strategies in (c).

Page 30 of 104

Appendix A: Stocking Standards:

Free Growing Stocki Assess Ht. BGC Species ng Min Regen ment Min. Height Rel. MIN MIN Specie to Classification Target pa p Inter- Delay s Ht Comp. Comments * (well- Preferr Accept spaced/ (Max Zone/SZ Series ed (p) able (a) ha) Tree yrs) (yrs) (m) % (Block Number)

CWHdm 01/04 Fd Cw Hw Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd, Hw 3.00 150 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source used or if naturals pruned Pw 2.50 Cw 1.50

Where managing discrete areas of root disease Root Disease 01/04* Cw Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Cw 1.50 used or if naturals pruned Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Colluvial 01/04 Fd Cw Hw Pw* 800 300 300 1.5* 3 20 Fd, Hw 3.00 150 of non-mappable NP with less than 400 plantable Pw 2.50 spots per hectare. PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source used or if naturals pruned Cw, 1.50 Cw Hw 03 Fd Pl Pw* 800 400 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Fd, Hw 2.00 used or if naturals pruned

Pl 1.25 Cw 1.00 Pw*Bg

05 Cw Fd Hw 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd, Hw 4.00 150 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Bg 3.50 used or if naturals pruned

Pw 2.50 Cw 2.00

06 Cw Hw Fd 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd, Hw 3.00 150 Cw 1.50 Cw Fd Minimum preferred added via FSP Amendment #1 07 Bg Hw 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd, Hw 4.00 150 (previous amendment #253) June 13, 2007; SSID Bg 3.50 #1009473

Cw 2.00

08 / 09 Bg Cw Ss 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Ss 4.00 150

Bg 3.50 Cw 2.00 08/09/ Limited to pre-harvest stands where deciduous Sawlog 10* Act Dr 900 600 500 2.0 3 20 Act, Dr 4.00 150 species are leading (60%) by Basal Area.

08/09/ Limited to pre-harvest stands where deciduous Pulp 10* Dr Act 1200 700 600 2.0 3 8 Act, Dr 4.00 150 species are leading (60%) by Basal Area. Cw Pw* 01/04/ Hw Py CWHds1 05 Fd Bg* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 Pw is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Fd 2.25 used or if naturals pruned Cw, Bg 1.50 Bg is limited to site series 05

Py 1.25

Hw 1.00 Ba, Hw, Pw, Py, Via FSP Amendment #2 (previously amendment # CWHds1 01 Fdc, Cw Bg 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fdc 2.3 150 254); June 13, 2007 SSID # 1010049 Cw 1.5

Ba 0.8

Hw 1.0 Pw 2.5

Py 1.3 Bg 1.5

01/04/ Cw Py Root Disease 05* Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 Where managing discrete areas of root disease Pw is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Cw 1.50 used or if naturals pruned Py 1.25

Page 32 of 104

Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or 01/04/ Cw Pw* shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Colluvial 05 Fd Hw Py 800 300 300 1.5* 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 of non-mappable NP with less than 400 plantable Fd 2.25 spots per hectare. Pw is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Cw 1.50 used or if naturals pruned Py 1.25

Hw 1.00

Py Cw Pl 03 Fd Pw* 800 400 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 Pw is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Fd 1.50 used or if naturals pruned

Pl 1.25

Cw, Py 1.00

06 Hw Fd Cw 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd 2.25 150

Cw 1.50

Hw 1.00 Cw Fd 07 Bg Hw 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd 3.00 150

Bg, Cw 2.00

Hw 1.25

08 / 09 Cw Bg 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Bg, Cw 2.00 150

08 / Limited to pre-harvest stands where deciduous 09* Act Dr 900 600 500 2.0 3 20 Act, Dr 4.00 150 species are leading (60%) by Basal Area. Hw Ba Se Yc CWHms1 01* Cw Fd Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.5 150 Fd 2.25 Below 1100 metres elevation Cw, PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Hw, Yc 1.50 used or if naturals pruned

Se 1.00

Ba 0.75

Page 33 of 104

Greater than 900 metres elevation and east of the height of land between Harrison Lake and Fraser Ba Hw Canyon plus east of the height of land between CWHms1 Upper Se Yc Jones Lake / Chilliwack Valley, and SilverHope Eastern 01* FdCw** HmCw Bl 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150* Drainage. PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Pw* Fd 2.25 used or if naturals pruned Cw, Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Hw, Yc 1.50 fireweed. ** Amend#136 - Fd moved from acceptable to preferred - ecologically primary - Fd preference decreases with increasing elevation. Cw also moved to preferred as Cw is a desireable stand component, similar to the "classic" CWHms1 01 Se, Hm 1.00 above. Amendment # 232 - Bl min. ht. added to correct Ba, Bl 0.75 Standards ID# 6960

Yc Hm Greater than 800m elevation and west of height of CWHms1 Upper Se Fd land between Harrison Lake and Fraser Canyon Western 01* Ba Hw Cw Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.5 150* plus west of height of land between Jones Lake/Chilliwack Valley, and Silverhope Drainage Amendment # 232 - Fd added to ID# 6961 as this Fd 2.25 species is ecologically acceptable as a stand Hw, component on zonal sites in this BGC. Cw, Yc 1.50 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Hm, Se 1.00 used or if naturals pruned Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for fireweed. Ba 0.75 Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or Ba Cw shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Colluvial 01/03 Fd Se Hm Hw 900 300 300 1.5* 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 of non-mappable NP with less than 400 plantable Bl Pl Pw* Fd 2.25 spots per hectare. Cw, PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Hw, Pl 1.50 used or if naturals pruned

Se, Hm 1.00

Ba, Bl 0.75 Pl Se Cw 03 Fd Hw Pw* 800 400 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Fd 2.25 used or if naturals pruned Cw, Hw, Pl 1.50 Se 1.00

Page 34 of 104

Hw Ba Yc Se 04/06 Fd Cw Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd 3.00 150 Pw 2.50 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Cw, used or if naturals pruned Hw, Yc 2.00

Se 1.25

Ba 1.00

Ba Cw CWHms1 Upper Yc Se Hw Bl Greater than 900 metres elevation and east of the Eastern 04/06* FdCw** Pw* Hm 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd 3.00 150* height of land between Harrison Lake and Fraser Pw 2.50 Canyon plus east of the height of land between Cw, Jones Lake / Chilliwack Valley, and Silverhope Hw, Yc 2.00 Drainage. PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source used or if naturals pruned Se, Hm 1.25 Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Bl, Ba 1.00 fireweed. ** Amend#136 - Fd moved from acceptable to preferred - ecologically primary - Fd preference decreases with elevation.

Yc Hm CWHms1 Upper Se Cw Western 01* Ba Hw Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.5 150

Hw, Cw, Yc 1.50 Greater than 800m elevation and west of height of land between Harrison Lake and Fraser Canyon plus west of height of land between Jones Lake/Chilliwack Valley, and Silverhope Drainage Hm, Se 1.00 . PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source used or if naturals pruned Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for fireweed. Ba 0.75

Page 35 of 104

Greater than 800 metres elevation and West of the Hw Hm height of land between Harrison Lake and Fraser CWHms1 Upper Ba Cw Se Fd Canyon plus West of the height of land between Western 04/06* Yc Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd 3.00 150* Jones Lake / Chilliwack Valley, and SilverHope Pw 2.50 Drainage. Cw, PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Hw, Yc 2.00 used or if naturals pruned Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Se, Hm 1.25 fireweed.

Ba 1.00

Cw Yc 05 Ba Hw Fd Pw* 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150* PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Fd 2.25 used or if naturals pruned Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Cw, fireweed. Hw, Yc 1.50

Ba 0.75

07/08 Ba Cw Se 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Cw 2.00 150

Se 1.25

Ba 1.00

07 / 08 Limited to pre-harvest stands where deciduous * Act Dr 900 600 500 2.0 3 20 Act, Dr 4.00 150 species are leading (60%) by Basal Area. 01 / 04 Cw Hw CWHvm1 /05 Fd Yc 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Fd, Hw, 3.00 150 Ba is limited to acceptable in the 04 Ba* Ba 1.75 Cw, Yc 1.50 Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or Cw Hw shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Colluvial 01 / 04 Fd Ba 900 300 300 1.5* 3 20 Fd, Hw 3.00 150 of non-mappable NP with less than 400 plantable Ba 1.75 spots per hectare.

Cw, 1.50

Cw Hw 03 Fd Pl 800 400 400 2.0 3 20 Fd, Hw 2.00 150

Pl 1.25 Cw 1.00

Page 36 of 104

Ba Cw 06 Hw Yc 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Hw 3.00 150

Ba 1.75 Cw, Yc 1.50 Ba Cw Fd, Hw, 07 / 08 Hw Ss Fd Yc 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Ss 4.00 150

Ba 2.25 Cw, Yc 2.00

09 / Limited to pre-harvest stands where deciduous Sawlog 10* Act Dr 900 600 500 2.0 3 20 Act, Dr 4.00 150 species are leading (60%) by Basal Area. 09 / Limited to pre-harvest stands where deciduous Pulp 10* Dr Act 1200 700 600 2.0 3 20 Act, Dr 4.00 150 species are leading (60%) by Basal Area. Fd Hw CWHvm2 01 Cw Yc Hm 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Hw 2.50 150 Ba Fd 2.25

Ba 1.75 Cw, Yc, Hm 1.50 Cw Hw Pw* Ba 03 / 04 Fd Yc Hm 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source Hw 1.75 used or if naturals pruned Fd, Ba 1.50 Cw, Yc, Hm 1.00 Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or Cw Hw Ba Pw* shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Colluvial 03 / 04 Fd Yc Hm Pl 900 300 300 1.5* 3 20 Pw 2.50 150 of non-mappable NP with less than 400 plantable Hw 1.75 spots per hectare. PW is acceptable if blister rust resistant seed source

Ba, Fd 1.50 used or if naturals pruned Pl 1.25 Cw, Yc 1.00

Hm 1.00 Cw Hw 05 / 06 Yc Ba Fd* Hm 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Hw 2.50 150 Fd 2.25 Fd is limited to site series 05. Ba 1.75 Cw, Yc, Hm 1.50 Cw Hw 07 / 08 Yc Ba Hm Ss 900 500 400 2.0 3 20 Ss 4.00 150

Page 37 of 104

Hw 3.50

Ba 2.25 Cw, Yc 2.00 Hm 1.50 Cw Hw 09 Yc Ba Hm 800 400 400 2.0 3 20 Hw 1.75 150 Ba 1.50 Cw, Yc, Hm 1.00

01/05/ ESSFmw 06 Se Ba Bl Hm, Pl 1200 700 600 2.0 4 20 Pl 2.00 125 Se, Hm 1.00

Bl 0.75 Ba 0.60

Colluvial 01 Se Ba Bl Pl, Fd 1000 400 300 1.5* 4 20 Pl 2.00 125 Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Se, Fd 1.00 of non-mappable NP with less than 500 plantable spots per hectare. Bl 0.75 Ba 0.60

03 Pl Fd Se 1000 500 400 2.0 4 20 Pl 1.25 125

Fd 1.00 Se 0.75

04 Pl Se Fd Bl Ba 1200 700 600 2.0 4 20 Pl 1.25 125

Fd 1.00 Se 0.75

Ba, Bl 0.60 Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Colluvial 03 / 04 Pl Fd Se Bl 1000 400 300 1.5* 4 20 Pl 1.25 125 of non-mappable NP with less than 500 plantable Fd 1.00 spots per hectare.

Se 0.75 Bl 0.60

07 / 08 Bl Se Ba Pl Cw 1000 500 400 2.0 4 20 Pl 1.25 125

Page 38 of 104

Se, Cw 0.75 Ba, Bl 0.60

IDFww 01 Fd Pl PyCw 600 400 400 2.0 3 20 Pl 2.00 150 Cw, Fd, Py 1.50 01/03/ Root Disease 04* PlPy Cw 600 400 400 2.0 3 20 Pl 2.00 150 Where managing discrete areas of root disease PyCw 1.50 Applies to colluvial slopes, exposed bedrock, or 01/03/ shallow soil, with low residual stocking levels, areas Colluvial 04 Fd Py Pl 600 300 300 1.5* 3 20 Pl 2.00 150 of non-mappable NP with less than 400 plantable spots per hectare. Fd,Py 1.50

03 Fd Pl Py 600 400 400 2.0 3 20 Pl 2.00 150

Fd,Py 1.50

04 Fd Py Cw 600 400 400 2.0 3 15 Pl 2.00 150 Cw, Fd,Py 1.50 Bg, Cw, 05 / 06 Cw Fd Hw Bg 1000 500 400 2.0 3 15 Fd 2.00 150

Hw 1.50

01/03/ Ba Hm Se Hw Hm, MHmm1 04/05 Yc Cw 900 500 400 2.0 4 20 Hw, Yc 1.00 125* Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for fireweed. Se Cw 1.00

Ba 0.60

01/03/ Ba Hm Se Hw Hm, Nat Regen 04/05* Yc Cw 900 500 400 2.0 7 20 Hw, Yc 1.00 125* Natural regeneration option. Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Se Cw 1.00 fireweed. Ba 0.60

Page 39 of 104

06 / Hm Yc Minor inclusion (up to 20%) of 08 and 09 site series 07* Ba 900 500 400 2.0 4 20 Hm, Yc 0.75 125* is acceptable Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Se 0.75 fireweed. Ba 0.60 Applies to snow holes, inclusion (greater than 20%) 06 / Hm Yc of 08 and 09 site series, low residual stocking levels <400 p.s. 07* Ba 900 300 300 1.5* 4 20 Hm, Yc 0.75 125* (clumpy), areas of non-mappable NP with less than Se 0.75 400 plantable spots per hectare. Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Ba 0.60 fireweed.

01/03/ Ba Hm Hw Bl Bl, Hm, MHmm2 04/05 Se Cw Yc 900 500 400 2.0 4 20 Hw, Yc 1.00 125* Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for fireweed. Se Cw 1.00

Ba 0.60

01/03/ Ba Hm Hw Bl Bl, Hm, Nat Regen 04/05 Se Cw Yc 900 500 400 2.0 7 20 Hw, Yc 1.00 125* Natural regeneration option. Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Se Cw 1.00 fireweed. Ba 0.60

06 / Hm Yc Minor inclusion (up to 20%) of 08 and 09 site series 07* Ba Se 900 500 400 2.0 4 20 Hm, Yc 0.75 125* is acceptable Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Se 0.75 fireweed. Ba 0.60 Applies to snow holes, inclusion (greater than 20%) 06 / Hm Yc of 08 and 09 site series, low residual stocking levels <400 p.s. 07* Ba Se 900 300 300 1.5* 4 20 Hm, Yc 0.75 125* (clumpy), areas of non-mappable NP with less than 400 plantable spots per hectare. Se 0.75 Ht. Rel. to Comp. can be reduced to 100% for Ba 0.60 fireweed.

Page 40 of 104

Appendix B FSP Maps, FDU & Declared Areas

Table B2: FSP Maps:

Map Number Scale

1 Overview Map 1:250,000 2 92G /01 1:50,000 3 92G /02 1:50,000 4 92G /03 1:50,000 5 92G /06 1:50,000 6 92G /07 1:50,000 7 92G /08 1:50,000 8 92G /09 1:50,000 9 92G /10 1:50,000 10 92G /11 1:50,000 11 92G /15 1:50,000 12 92G /16 1:50,000 13 92H /02 1:50,000 14 92H /03 1:50,000 15 92H /04 1:50,000 16 92H /05 1:50,000 17 92H /06 1:50,000 18 92H /11 1:50,000 19 92H /12 1:50,000 20 92H /13 1:50,000 21 92H /14 1:50,000 22 92I /03 1:50,000 23 92I /04 1:50,000 24 92J /01 1:50,000

Page 41 of 104

Table B3: Forest Development Units:

Landscape Unit FDU Covers the: Entire Landscape Unit Area? 1 Ainsle Yes 2 Alouette No (Park, TFL) 3 Anderson Yes 4 Big Silver Yes 5 Chehalis Yes 6 Chilliwack No (Park) 7 Coquihalla No (Park) 8 East Harrison No (Park) 9 Fraser Valley South No (City settlements) 10 Hatzic No (TFL-26) 11 Manning NO (Park) 12 Mehatl No (Park) 13 Nahatlatch Yes 14 Silverhope Yes 15 Spuzzum Yes 16 Stave Yes 17 Tretheway Yes 18 West Harrison Yes 19 Yale Yes 20 MTFL1 No (area based tenure)

1: MTFL is an abbreviation for the Mission Tree Farm License – TFL 26.

Fraser Valley South FDU within the Fraser Valley South LU, excludes the most populated areas.

The Mission Tree Farm License (MTFL) FDU will cover the entire TFL # 26 land base.

Page 42 of 104

Table B4: Declared Areas:

Cutblocks:

Block Date FSP Amendment FDU Gross Area Volume Map # Number Declared # Yale AM106 02-Jul-08 15 37 16308 92H201 Depot DP101 26-Aug-08 16 37.7 13474 92H102 Yale AM111 28-Aug-08 17 17.8 11029 92H201 Yale YA106 06-Feb-09 19 30.9 14268 92H301 Yale YA203 06-Feb-09 19 4.5 2508 92H301 Stave WN105 06-Feb-09 19 45.3 25244 92G305 East Harrison WD120 06-Feb-09 19 38.7 28481 92H201 Hatzic-1 LO112 06-Feb-09 19 29.9 7094 92G205 Hatzic-1 LO119 06-Feb-09 19 8.1 2298 92G205 East Harrison WD121 27/May/09 20 3.3 1018 92H201 Stave WN201 27/May/09 20 7.9 4789 92G305 Alouette AL303 27/May/09 20 33.5 20090 92G205 Stave SV202 30-Oct-09 22 31.5 16769 92G305 West Harrison HW211 07-Jun-10 26 34.2 16939 92H201 East Harrison CB918C 07-Jun-10 26 48.4 26464 92H201 Silverhope JN100 18-Aug-10 29 52.5 20738 92H201 Coquihalla PE106 18-Aug-10 29 8.9 7084 92H202 West Harrison HW213 16-Sep-10 30 16.2 5706 92H201 West Harrison HW214 16-Sep-10 30 29 12002 92H201 Nahatlach NK063 20-Oct-10 31 32.6 12345 92H501 East Harrison CB102 20-Oct-10 31 6.4 2417 92H201 East Harrison CD100 14-Mar-11 32 29.5 13671 92H201 McGuire LM106 08-Apr-11 34 19.3 7827 92H101 Silverhope HU203 08-Apr-11 34 20 9791 92H201 Silverhope HU204 08-Apr-11 34 12.7 5803 92H201 Silverhope HU206 08-Apr-11 34 3.9 2862 92H201 West Harrison HW217 17-May-11 35 24.2 11027 92H201 West Harrison CO200 17-May-11 35 14.5 4713 92H201 West Harrison CO201 17-May-11 35 21.3 10623 92H201 East Harrison CB112 17-May-11 35 16.7 6106 92H201 East Harrison CB113 17-May-11 35 24.5 5975 92H201

Page 43 of 104

Roads: FSP Road Date Length FDU Amendment Section Map Identifier Declared (km) # Yale AM1800 28-Aug-08 0.234 17 0+000 - 0+234 92H201 Stave WN1340 06-Feb-09 0.117 19 0+000 - 0+117 92G305 East Harrison WD2730 06-Feb-09 0.263 19 0+000 - 0+263 92H201 East Harrison WD2740 06-Feb-09 0.157 19 0+206 - 0+361 92H201 Alouette FL7500 27/May/09 0.044 20 0+000 - 0+044 92G205 Alouette FL7000 27/May/09 0.350 20 0+497 - 0+847 92G205 Alouette FL7000 27/May/09 0.090 20 1+063 - 1+153 92G205 Alouette FL7000 27/May/09 0.007 20 1+451 - 1+458 92G205 Alouette FL7100 27/May/09 0.049 20 0+086 - 0+135 92G205 Stave SV1500 30/Oct/09 0.148 22 0+200 - 0+348 92G305 Stave SV1600 30/Oct/09 0.173 22 0+223 - 0+396 92G305 Stave SV1800 30/Oct/09 0.049 22 0+026 - 0+075 92G305 East Harrison HE1122 07-Jun-10 0.106 26 0+272 to 0+378 92H201 East Harrison HE1122 07-Jun-10 0.35 26 0+515 to 0+550 92H201 East Harrison HE1142 07-Jun-10 0.193 26 0+253 to 0+446 92H201 East Harrison HE11321 07-Jun-10 0.064 26 0+000 to 0+064 92H201 East Harrison HE11420 07-Jun-10 0.148 26 0+011 to 0+159 92H201 East Harrison HE11421 07-Jun-10 0.070 26 0+000 to 0+070 92H201 East Harrison HE11320 07-Jun-10 0.070 26 0+108 to 0+178 92H201 West Harrison FN1223 16-Sep-10 0.108 30 0+000 to 0+108 92H201 East Harrison CP1600 14-Mar-11 0.136 32 0+471 to 0+607 92H201 Silverhope HU1830 08-Apr-11 0.541 34 0+000 to 0+541 92H201 Silverhope HU1900 08-Apr-11 0.19 34 0+000 to 0+190 92H201 Silverhope HU2000 08-Apr-11 0.058 34 0+585 to 0+643 92H201 McGuire LI1500 08-Apr-11 0.19 34 0+352 to 0+542 92H101 McGuire LI1500 08-Apr-11 0.352 34 0+000 to 0+352 92H101 West Harrison WV1600 17-May-11 0.547 35 1+352 to 1+899 92H201 West Harrison WV1620 17-May-11 0.074 35 0+000 to 0+074 92H201 West Harrison CS1300 17-May-11 0.029 35 0+000 to 0+029 92H201 West Harrison CS1400 17-May-11 0.021 35 0+000 to 0+021 92H201 West Harrison CS1500 17-May-11 0.037 35 0+000 to 0+037 92H201 West Harrison CS1600 17-May-11 0.021 35 0+000 to 0+021 92H201 West Harrison CS1700 17-May-11 0.014 35 0+000 to 0+014 92H201 East Harrison HE2920 17-May-11 0.33 35 0+000 to 0+330 92H201 East Harrison HE2920 17-May-11 0.514 35 0+423 to 0+937 92H201 East Harrison HE2923 17-May-11 0.226 35 0+000 to 0+226 92H201

Page 44 of 104

Table B5: Road Permits in Effect.

The following is a list of Road Permits that were ‘in effect’ at the time of the submission of the amendment.

Road Permits in Effect Geographic Location Licensee R16089 Ruby BCTS R16683 Hunter Creek BCTS R16718 8 Mile Creek BCTS R16922 American Creek BCTS R17312 Mount Woodside BCTS R17345 Stave Winslow BCTS R17580 Spuzzum BCTS R17684 Coquihalla/Wray BCTS R17783 Cascade Bay BCTS R17945 Jones Lake BCTS R18254 West Harrison BCTS R18359 Connor Creek BCTS R18474 Lost Creek BCTS R18527 Hunter Creek BCTS R18561 Lost Creek BCTS LEQ' A: MEL FORESTRY LIMITED R18564 Statlu Creek PARTNERSHIP R18660 Mount Woodside BCTS R18661 Stoyoma Creek BCTS R18684 Wray Creek BCTS R18733 Alouette Lake BCTS R18786 Spuzzum Creek BCTS R18807 Hunter Creek BCTS R18812 Yale Yale First Nation R18882 Centre Creek BCTS R18945 Stave Lake BCTS R18964 Alouette Lake BCTS R19017 Lost Creek BCTS R19044 Skagit Valley BCTS R19058 Nesakwatch Creek BCTS R19208 Liumchen Creek BCTS R19270 Depot Creek BCTS R19336 Eight Mile Creek BCTS R19346 Lost Creek BCTS R19425 Hope Hope Community Forest

Page 45 of 104

Appendix C: Biodiversity Legal Objectives Orders

Contents

1. Ainsle Landscape Unit

2. Alouette Landscape Unit

3. Anderson Landscape Unit

4. Big Silver Landscape Unit

5. Chehalis Landscape Unit

6. Chilliwack Landscape Unit

7. Coquihalla Landscape Unit

8. East Harrison Landscape Unit

9. Fraser Valley South Landscape Unit

10. Hatzic Landscape Unit

11. Manning Landscape Unit

12. Mehatl Landscape Unit

13. Nahatlatch Landscape Unit

14. Silverhope Landscape Unit

15. Spuzzum Landscape Unit

16. Stave Landscape Unit

17. Tretheway Landscape Unit

18. West Harrison Landscape Unit

19. Yale Landscape Unit

Page 46 of 104

Blank page

Page 47 of 104

AINSLIE LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Fraser Canyon LUPs Legal Order)

Pursuant to section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are landscape unit objectives for the Ainslie Landscape Unit. The goal of these objectives is to sustain biological diversity at the landscape level; exemptions are included to streamline administrative procedures and address operational safety concerns.

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Objective 1 1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in designated old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on shown on the Ainslie Landscape Unit map dated December 11, 2003, and as amended from time to time. Timber harvesting, including salvage, single tree selection, topping for cone harvesting, and commercial gathering of botanical forest products, will not be permitted within OGMAs except as specified in section 2 and 3 below. 2. The Delegated Decision Maker (DDM) may allow operations to occur within an OGMA for reasons such as: (1) To prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose a significant threat to forested areas outside of OGMAs. This will be done in a manner that retains as many old growth forest attributes as possible. (2) Construction of roads and yarding corridors if no other practicable option exists.

3. Exemptions: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes. (2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements. (3) Road construction can occur in OGMA #74 and #28 as required to access resource values beyond the OGMA. (4) OGMAs that are >10 ha in size may be modified for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of : a) 10 ha in variant CWHms1, b) 60 ha in variant ESSFmw, and c) 60 ha in variant IDFww, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved, in one of the following categories: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10%. iv) Construction of ≤500m of road or a bridge within an OGMA where there is no other practicable option. As an alternative to finding replacement area, the licensee

Page 48 of 104

may permanently deactivate or rehabilitate a temporary road or bridge site within four years after construction. v) Construction of rock quarries and gravel pits under authority of forest tenure where the development will be located immediately adjacent to existing roads under tenure and will affect the OGMA by <0.5 ha. (5) Intrusions, other than those specified in (4) above, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

4. Exemption 3(4) above does not apply to the following OGMAs: #73, 76, 97, 102, 104, 112, 113, 115, 116, 132, 141.

Objective 2 Maintain stand level structural diversity by retaining wildlife tree patches (WTP). Cutblocks for which harvesting has been completed by each licensee by tenure will retain adequate amounts of wildlife tree patches to ensure that over each 3 year period, commencing on the date the objectives are established, the target percentage as noted in Table A is achieved. In addition: (1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock. (2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention. (3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below. (4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co- dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target. (5) WTPs must include, if present, live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees), or remnant old growth patches. (6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any existing moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees). (7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Ainsle FDU.

BEC Subzone Wildlife Tree Retention % CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 12 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 11 ESSF mw (Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir, moist warm 5 subzone) ESSF dc (Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir, dry cold subzone) 9 IDF ww (Interior Douglas-fir, wet warm subzone) 8

Page 49 of 104

ALOUETTE LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Lower Fraser SRMP Legal Order and Objectives)

This order establishes objectives for Old Growth Management Areas. The goal of these objectives is to contribute to biological diversity at the landscape level.

Ministerial Order: Land Use Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas (OGMAs) within the Alouette LandscapeUnit (LU) situated within the Chilliwack Forest District. Part 1 - Interpretation

1. Pursuant to Section 93.4 of the Land Act, the following objectives are established as land use objectives for the purposes of the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) and apply to OGMAs within the Alouette, Fraser Valley South, Hatzic, Pitt, Stave, and Widgeon LUs, as shown in the maps set out in Schedule A and contained in the OGMA spatial layer stored in the Geographic Warehouse (WHSE_LAND_USE_PLANNING.RMP_OGMA_LEGAL_CURRENT_SVW). 2. If there is a discrepancy between the areas shown in the maps set out in the attached Schedule A and the OGMA spatial layer stored in the Geographic Warehouse (WHSE_LAND_USE_PLANNING.RMP_OGMA_LEGAL_CURRENT_SVW), the areas as detailed in the OGMA spatial layer will take precedent. 3. Nothing in, under or arising out of this order either abrogates or derogates from any aboriginal rights, aboriginal title or treaty rights of any applicable First Nation, nor relieves the Province of any obligation to consult with any applicable First Nation.

Page 50 of 104

Part 2 - Objectives

4. Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas

(1) Retain forests in the OGMAs identified in 1 in the amounts set out in Table A as shown in the maps set out in Schedule A, except where necessary for the following: a) Topping or pruning of trees along boundaries necessary to improve wind firmness. b) Sanitation to prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose significant threat to forested areas. c) Removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way necessary for safety purposes. d) Recreation trail and site maintenance or development to address public safety. e) Felling trees for guyline clearance or tailholds. Any trees felled for tailhold or guyline purposes are to be left on site to function as coarse woody debris, unless the felled trees poses a significant risk to forest health.

(2) In addition to 4 (1) (a) to (e), harvesting within any OGMA is permitted, provided that all the following apply: (a) Harvesting is required to provide for: i. a logical harvesting boundary, or ii. road or bridge construction to access resource values beyond or adjacent to the OGMA and no other practicable option for road or bridge location exists; (b) The area harvested does not exceed the greater of: i. two hectares, or ii. 5 % of the area of the OGMA; and (c) The biological diversity of the OGMA is maintained.

(3) Replacement forest is required if the total area of an OGMA that is subject to the activities pursuant to 4 (1) and 4 (2) exceeds 0.5 ha. Replacement forest must be of an equal or greater area of forest, with equivalent or greater ecological attributes, in order of priority: (a) Contiguous to the OGMA in the same BEC subzone or variant; or, (b) Contiguous to another OGMA in the same BEC subzone or variant.

(4) Area harvested and the area replacing the area harvested made in accordance with 4 (3), including attributes and rationale, must be documented and submitted to the delegated decision maker at the end of each calendar year. Digital spatial data must be as ‘shape file’ and BC Albers projection.

Page 51 of 104

Table A. Minimum requirement of BEC Variant to be retained, by Landscape Unit

Minimum requirement of BEC Landscape Unit BEC Variant Variant to be retained as OGMA % Alouette CWHdm > 9 CWHvm1 > 13 CWHvm2 > 13 MHmm1 > 19 Fraser Valley South CWHdm > 9 CWHds1 > 9 CWHms1 > 9 CWHvm2 > 13 CWHxm1 > 9 MHmm1 > 19 MHmm2 > 19 Hatzic CWHdm > 9 CWHvm1 > 13 CWHvm2 > 13 MHmm1 > 19 Pitt CWHdm > 9 CWHvm1 > 13 CWHvm2 > 13 MHmm1 > 19 Stave CWHvm1 > 13 CWHvm2 > 13 MHmm1 > 19 MHmm2 > 19 Widgeon CWHdm > 9 CWHvm1 > 13 CWHvm2 > 13 CWHxm1 > 9 MHmm1 > 19

Page 52 of 104

ANDERSON LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES - (Fraser Canyon LUPs Legal Order)

Pursuant to section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are landscape unit objectives for the Anderson Landscape Unit. The goal of these objectives is to sustain biological diversity at the landscape level; exemptions are included to streamline administrative procedures and address operational safety concerns.

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Objective 1

1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in designated old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Anderson Landscape Unit Map dated December 11, 2003, and as amended from time to time. Timber harvesting, including salvage, single tree selection, topping for cone harvesting, and commercial gathering of botanical forest products, will not be permitted within OGMAs except as specified in section 2 and 3 below.

2. The Delegated Decision Maker (DDM) may allow operations to occur within an OGMA for reasons such as (1) To prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose a significant threat to forested areas outside of OGMAs. This will be done in a manner that retains as many old growth forest attributes as possible. (2) Construction of roads and yarding corridors if no other practicable option exists.

3. Exemptions: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes. (2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements. (3) OGMAs that are >10 ha in size may be modified for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of : a) 15 ha in variant CWHds1, b) 80 ha in variant CWHms1, c) 40 ha in variant ESSFmw, d) 35 ha in IDFww, and e) 50 ha in variant MHmm2, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved, in one of the following categories: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10%.

Page 53 of 104

iv) Construction of ≤500m of road or a bridge within an OGMA where there is no other practicable option. As an alternative to finding replacement area, the licensee may permanently deactivate or rehabilitate a temporary road or bridge site within four years after construction. v) Construction of rock quarries and gravel pits under authority of forest tenure where the development will be located immediately adjacent to existing roads under tenure and will affect the OGMA by <0.5 ha. (4) Intrusions, other than those specified in (3) above, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

4. Exemption 3(3) above does not apply to the following OGMAs: # 29, 35, 36, 51, 63, 64, 79, 80, 87, 99, 100. 5. In OGMA #87, 30-50% basal area removal may occur within the Riparian Management Zone adjacent to the Anderson River.

Objective 2 Maintain stand level structural diversity by retaining wildlife tree patches (WTP). Cutblocks for which harvesting has been completed by each licensee by tenure will retain adequate amounts of wildlife tree patches to ensure that over each 3 year period, commencing on the date the objectives are established, the target percentage as noted in Table A is achieved. In addition: (1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock. (2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention. (3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below. (4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co- dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target. (5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees). (6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any existing moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees). (7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Anderson FDU.

BEC Subzone Wildlife Tree Retention % CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 9 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 9 ESSF mw (Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir, moist warm 6 subzone) MHmm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime subzone) 7 IDF ww (Interior Douglas-fir, wet warm subzone) 5

Page 54 of 104

BIG SILVER LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Amended by Ministerial Order Dec 16, 2010)

The goal of these objectives is to sustain biological diversity at the landscape level; permissible activities are described to streamline administrative procedures and address operational safety concerns.

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Big Silver Landscape Unit.

Objective 1

1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Big Silver Lanscape Unit map, dated December 2, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

(3) Where OGMA boundary adjustments and replacement areas are required under section 2 (1) and (2) they must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the Delegated Decision Maker (DDM) at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval.

(4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs #1, 10, 42, 45, 48, 69, 90, 94, 101, 111 and the mapped old forest portion in all OGMAs in the CWHds1.

Page 55 of 104

(3) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

4. Permissible Activities for Safety Purposes: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes. (2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements.

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co- dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

Page 56 of 104

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Big Silver FDU.

BEC Subzone % Wildlife Tree Retention CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 9 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 9 MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 5

Page 57 of 104

CHEHALIS LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Order Efective as of March 15, 2006)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Chehalis Landscape Unit.

Objective 1 1. Maintenance or recruitment of old growth forests Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Chehalis Lanscape Unit Map, dated January 31, 2006, and updated from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2 and 3 below.

2. Permissible activities within OGMAs (1) Timber harvest may occur to prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose a significant threat to forested areas outside of OGMAs. Salvage within OGMAs will be done in a manner that retains as many old growth forest attributes as possible.

(3) Construction of ≤500 m of road or a bridge within an OGMA where there is no other practicable option, provided that replacement OGMA is identified. 4) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total. 5) Where OGMA replacement forest is required as a result of activities under 2.(1), 2.(2) or 2.(3), it must be of equivalent or better quality and quantity and be identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved. OGMA replacement areas must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the DDM at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval.

3. Permissible Activities for Safety Purposes: 1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes.

2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements

Page 58 of 104

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC Subzone in the Chehalis FDU.

BEC Subzone % Wildlife Tree Retention CWH dm (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry 10 maritime) CWH vm ( Coastal Western Hemlock, very 10 moist) MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 5

Page 59 of 104

CHILLIWACK LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Order Efective as of June 24, 2005)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Chilliwack Landscape Unit.

Objective 1

1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Chilliwack Lanscape Unit map dated December 2, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

2. (1) Where sufficient suitable replacement forest is available in the variants listed below, timber harvesting or road construction may be undertaken in OGMAs that are = to or >10 ha in size for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of: i) 10 ha in variant CWHdm, ii) 30 ha in variant CWHms1, iii) 10 ha in variant CWHvm2, and iv) 50 ha in variant MHmm2, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA.

(4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs #18, 37, 38, 57, 137, 147, 148, 152, and the mapped old forest portion of all OGMAs in the CWHdm.

Page 60 of 104

3. Permissible Activities: (1) Timber harvest may occur to prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose a significant threat to forested areas outside of OGMAs. Salvage within OGMAs will be done in a manner that retains as many old growth forest attributes as possible. (2) Construction of rock quarries and gravel pits under authority of forest tenure where the development will be located immediately adjacent to existing roads under tenure and will affect the OGMA by <0.5 ha. (3) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total. (4) Where OGMA replacement forest is required as a result of activities under 3 (1) or (2), it must be of equivalent or better quality and quantity and be identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved. OGMA replacement areas must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the DDM at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval.

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention, except in the ESSFmw subzone.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Page 61 of 104

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Chilliwack FDU.

BEC Subzone Total Wildlife Tree Retention % CWH dm (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry maritime) 13 CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 11 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist 11 submaritime) CWH vm (Coastal Western Hemlock, very wet 9 maritime) CWH xm (Coastal Western Hemlock, very dry 10 maritime) MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 8

Page 62 of 104

COQUIHALLA LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Order Efective as of April 14, 2004)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Coquihalla Landscape Unit.

Objective 1

1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Coquihalla Lanscape Unit map, dated March 10, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

(2) The criteria in 2 (1) is to apply to individual OGMAs within the categories below and must ensure that ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <10%. iv) Construction of ≤500m of road or a bridge within an OGMA where there is no other practicable option. As an alternative to finding replacement area, the licensee may permanently deactivate and rehabilitate a temporary road or bridge site within four years after construction.

(4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs #39, 98, 131, 135, 155, 170, 187.

3. Permissible Activities:

Page 63 of 104

(3) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention, except in the ESSFmw subzone.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

Page 64 of 104

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC Subzone in the Coquihalla FDU BEC Subzone Total Wildlife Tree Retention % CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 6 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 7 ESSF mw (Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir moist warm 0 subzone) MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 5

Page 65 of 104

EAST HARRISON LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES - (Amended by Ministerial Order Dec 16, 2010)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the East Harrison Landscape Unit.

Objective 1 1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the East Harrison Landscape Unit map, dated December 2, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

Page 66 of 104

(4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs # 24, 25, 27, 109, 175, 207, 223, 246, 253 and the mapped old forest portion in all OGMAs in the CWHdm and CWHds1 variants.

(3) Road construction can occur in OGMA # 201 and 205 to access resource values beyond the OGMA.

(4) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

(5) Where OGMA replacement forest is required as a result of activities under 3 (1) (2) or (3), it must be of equivalent or better quality and quantity and be identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved. OGMA replacement areas must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the DDM at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval.

(2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements.

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

Page 67 of 104

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the East Harrison FDU. BEC Subzone Wildlife Tree Retention % CWH dm (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry maritime 9 CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 8 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist 8 submaritime) CWH vm (Coastal Western Hemlock, very wet maritime) 12 MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 7

Page 68 of 104

FRASER VALLEY SOUTH LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Lower Fraser SRMP Legal Order and Objectives)

This order establishes objectives for Old Growth Management Areas. The goal of these objectives is to contribute to biological diversity at the landscape level.

Ministerial Order: Land Use Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas (OGMAs) within the Fraser Valley South LandscapeUnit (LU) situated within the Chilliwack Forest District.

Part 1 - Interpretation

Page 69 of 104

Part 2 - Objectives

4. Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas

Page 70 of 104

Table A. Minimum requirement of BEC Variant to be retained, by Landscape Unit

Page 71 of 104

HATZIC LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Lower Fraser SRMP Legal Order and Objectives)

This order establishes objectives for Old Growth Management Areas. The goal of these objectives is to contribute to biological diversity at the landscape level.

Ministerial Order: Land Use Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas (OGMAs) within the Hatzic LandscapeUnit (LU) situated within the Chilliwack Forest District.

Part 1 - Interpretation

Page 72 of 104

Part 2 - Objectives

4. Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas

Page 73 of 104

Table A. Minimum requirement of BEC Variant to be retained, by Landscape Unit

Page 74 of 104

MANNING LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES - (Order Efective as of April 14, 2004)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Manning Landscape Unit.

Objective 1 1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Manning Landscape Unit Map, dated March 10, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

(4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs #3, 4, 5, 59, 73, 86, 92, 126, 129, 135, 136, 138.

3. Permissible Activities:

Page 75 of 104

(1) Timber harvest may occur to prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose a significant threat to forested areas outside of OGMAs. Salvage within OGMAs will be done in a manner that retains as many old growth forest attributes as possible. (2) Construction of rock quarries and gravel pits under authority of forest tenure where the development will be located immediately adjacent to existing roads under tenure and will affect the OGMA by <0.5 ha. (3) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total. (4) Where OGMA replacement forest is required as a result of activities under 3 (1) or (2), it must be of equivalent or better quality and quantity and be identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved. OGMA replacement areas must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the DDM at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval.

Objective 2 Maintain stand level structural diversity by retaining wildlife tree patches (WTP). Cutblocks for which harvesting has been completed by each licensee by tenure will retain adequate amounts of wildlife tree patches to ensure that over each 3 year period, commencing on the date the objectives are established, the target percentage as noted in Table A is achieved. In addition: (1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock. (2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention, except in the ESSFmw subzone. (3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below. (4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target. (5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees). (6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees). (7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Manning FDU

BEC Subzone Wildlife Tree Retention % CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 2

Page 76 of 104

CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 4 ESSF mw (Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir moist warm 0 subzone) MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 2

Page 77 of 104

MEHATL LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES – (Fraser Canyon LUPs Legal Order)

Pursuant to section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are landscape unit objectives for the Mehatl Landscape Unit. The goal of these objectives is to sustain biological diversity at the landscape level; exemptions are included to streamline administrative procedures and address operational safety concerns.

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Objective 1 1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in designated old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the attached Mehatl Landscape Unit map dated December 11, 2003, and as amended from time to time,. Timber harvesting, including salvage, single tree selection, topping for cone harvesting, and commercial gathering of botanical forest products, will not be permitted within OGMAs except as specified in section 2 and 3 below. 2. The Delegated Decision Maker (DDM) may allow operations to occur within an OGMA for reasons such as: (1) To prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose a significant threat to forested areas outside of OGMAs. This will be done in a manner that retains as many old growth forest attributes as possible. (2) Construction of roads and yarding corridors if no other practicable option exists. 3. Exemptions: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes. (2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements. (3) Road construction can occur in OGMA #33 to access resource values beyond the OGMA. (4) OGMAs that are >10 ha in size may be modified for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of : a) 10 ha in variant CWHds1, b) 60 ha in variant CWHms1, c) 20 ha in variant ESSFmw, d) 5 ha in IDFww, and e) 40 ha in variant MHmm2, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved, in one of the following categories: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10%. iv) other practicable option. As an alternative to finding replacement area, the

Page 78 of 104

licensee may permanently deactivate or rehabilitate a temporary road or bridge site within four years after construction. v) Construction of rock quarries and gravel pits under authority of forest tenure where the development will be located immediately adjacent to existing roads under tenure and will affect the OGMA by <0.5 ha. (5) Intrusions, other than those specified in (4) above, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

4. Exemption 3(4) above does not apply to the following OGMAs: # 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 27, 36.

(1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock. (2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention, except in the MHmm subzone. (3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below. (4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target. (5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees). (6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any existing moderate to high value ildlife trees (excluding danger trees). (7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Mehatl Landscape Unit.

BEC Subzone % Wildlife Tree Retention CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 6 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 2 ESSF mw (Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir, moist warm subzone) 2 IDF ww (Interior Douglas-fir, wet warm subzone) 5 MHmm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime subzone) 1

Page 79 of 104

NAHATLATCH LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES - (Fraser Canyon LUPs Legal Order)

Pursuant to section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are landscape unit objectives for the Nahatlatch Landscape Unit. The goal of these objectives is to sustain biological diversity at the landscape level; exemptions are included to streamline administrative procedures and address operational safety concerns.

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Objective 1

1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in designated old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Nahatlatch Lanscape Unit map dated December 11, 2003, and as amended from time to time. Timber harvesting, including salvage, single tree selection, topping for cone harvesting, and commercial gathering of botanical forest products, will not be permitted within OGMAs except as specified in section 2 and 3 below.

2. The Delegated Decision Maker (DDM) may allow operations to occur within an OGMA for reasons such as: (1) To prevent the spread of insect infestations or diseases that pose a significant threat to forested areas outside of OGMAs. This will be done in a manner that retains as many old growth forest attributes as possible. (2) Construction of roads and yarding corridors if no other practicable option exists.

3. Exemptions: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes. (2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements. (3) OGMAs that are >10 ha in size may be modified for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of : a) 10 ha in variant CWHds1, b) 75 ha in variant CWHms1, c) 70 ha in variant ESSFmw, d) 70 ha in IDFww, and e) 35 ha in variant MHmm2, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2)in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved, in one of the following categories: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10%.

Page 80 of 104

4. Exemption 3(3) above does not apply to the following OGMAs: # 8, 9, 14, 28, 34, 53, 68, 77, 95, 108, 113, and 125.

Objective 2 Maintain stand level structural diversity by retaining wildlife tree patches (WTP). Cutblocks for which harvesting has been completed by each licensee by tenure will retain adequate amounts of wildlife tree patches to ensure that over each 3 year period, commencing on the date the objectives are established, the target percentage as noted in Table A is achieved. In addition: (1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock. (2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention. (3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below. (4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target. (5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees). (6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any existing moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees). (7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Nahatlatch FDU.

Bec Subzone Wildlife Tree retention % CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 3 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 7 ESSF mw (Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir, moist warm 8 subzone) MHmm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime subzone) 6 IDF ww (Interior Douglas-fir, wet warm subzone) 4

Page 81 of 104

SILVERHOPE LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES - (Order Efective as of April 14, 2004)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Silverhope Landscape Unit.

Objective 1

1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the on the Silverhope Landscape Unit map, dated March 10, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

2. (1) Where sufficient suitable replacement forest is available in the variants listed below, timber harvesting or road construction may be undertaken in OGMAs that are >10 ha in size for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of: i) 6 ha in variant CWHds1, ii) 90 ha in variant CWHms1, and iii) 60 ha in variant MHmm2, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA. (2) The criteria in 2 (1) is to apply to individual OGMAs within the categories below and must ensure that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <10%. iv) Construction of ≤500m of road or a bridge within an OGMA where there is no other practicable option. As an alternative to finding replacement area, the licensee may permanently deactivate and rehabilitate a temporary road or bridge site within four years after construction. (3) Where OGMA boundary adjustments and replacement areas are required under section 2 (1) and (2) they must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the Delegated Decision Maker (DDM) at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval. (4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs #46, 76, 166.

Page 82 of 104

Objective 2 Maintain stand level structural diversity by retaining wildlife tree patches (WTP). Cutblocks for which harvesting has been completed by each licensee by tenure will retain adequate amounts of wildlife tree patches to ensure that over each 3 year period, commencing on the date the objectives are established, the target percentage as noted in Table A is achieved. In addition: (1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock. (2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention. (3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below. (4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target. (5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees). (6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees). (7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC Subzone in the Silverhope FDU.

BEC Subzone % Wildlife Tree Retention CWH dm (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry maritime) 5 CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 6 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime 6 subzone) MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 3

Page 83 of 104

SPUZZUM LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES - (Fraser Canyon LUPs Legal Order)

Pursuant to section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are landscape unit objectives for the Spuzzum Landscape Unit. The goal of these objectives is to sustain biological diversity at the landscape level; exemptions are included to streamline administrative procedures and address operational safety concerns.

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Objective 1 1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in designated old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Spuzzum Lanscape Unit map dated December 11, 2003, and as amended from time to time. Timber harvesting, including salvage, single tree selection, topping for cone harvesting, and commercial gathering of botanical forest products, will not be permitted within OGMAs except as specified in section 2 and 3 below.

3. Exemptions: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes. (2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements. (3) OGMAs that are >10 ha in size may be modified for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of: a) 10 ha in variant CWHds1, b) 80 ha in variant CWHms1, c) 10 ha in variant IDFww, and d) 45 ha in variant MHmm2, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved, in one of the following categories: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed development affects the OGMA by <10%. iv) Construction of ≤500m of road or a bridge within an OGMA where there is no other practicable option. As an alternative to finding replacement area, the licensee may permanently deactivate or rehabilitate a temporary road or bridge site within four years after construction.

Page 84 of 104

v) Construction of rock quarries and gravel pits under authority of forest tenure where the development will be located immediately adjacent to existing roads under tenure and will affect the OGMA by <0.5 ha. (4) Intrusions, other than those specified in (3) above, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

4. Exemption 3(3) above does not apply to the following OGMAs: #41, 47.

Objective 2

Maintain stand level structural diversity by retaining wildlife tree patches (WTP). Cutblocks for which harvesting has been completed by each licensee by tenure will retain adequate amounts of wildlife tree patches to ensure that over each 3 year period, commencing on the date the objectives are established, the target percentage as noted in Table A is achieved. In addition: (1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock.

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any existing moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in Spuzzum FDU.

BEC Subzone Wildlife Tree Retention % CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 10 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 10 IDF ww (Interior Douglas-fir, wet warm subzone) 6 MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 4

Page 85 of 104

STAVE LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Lower Fraser SRMP Legal Order and Objectives)

This order establishes objectives for Old Growth Management Areas. The goal of these objectives is to contribute to biological diversity at the landscape level.

Ministerial Order: Land Use Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas (OGMAs) within the Stave LandscapeUnit (LU) situated within the Chilliwack Forest District.

Part 1 - Interpretation

Page 86 of 104

Part 2 - Objectives

4. Objectives for Old Growth Management Areas

Page 87 of 104

Table A. Minimum requirement of BEC Variant to be retained, by Landscape Unit

Page 88 of 104

TRETHEWAY LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES (Order Efective as of June 24, 2005)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Tretheway Landscape Unit.

Objective 1 1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the Tretheway Landscape Unit map dated December 2, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below. 2. (1) Where sufficient suitable replacement forest is available in the variants listed below, timber harvesting or road construction may be undertaken in OGMAs that are >10 ha in size for operational reasons up to a cumulative maximum of: i) 10 ha in variant CWHds1, ii) 15 ha in variant CWHms1, and iii) 10 ha in variant MHmm2, provided that replacement OGMA of equivalent or better quality and quantity is identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA.

(2) The criteria in 2 (1) is to apply to individual OGMAs within the categories below and must ensure that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved: i) OGMAs >10 ha to <50 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <5 ha, ii) OGMAs ≥50 ha to <100 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <10ha, iii) OGMAs ≥100 ha in size where the proposed activity affects the OGMA by <10%. iv) Construction of ≤500m of road or a bridge within an OGMA where there is no other practicable option. As an alternative to finding replacement area, the licensee may permanently deactivate and rehabilitate a temporary road or bridge site within four years after construction. (3) Where OGMA boundary adjustments and replacement areas are required under section 2 (1) and (2) they must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the Delegated Decision Maker (DDM) at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval. (4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs # 13, 23, 33, 47, 49, 59, 69, 75, and the old mapped portion of all OGMAs in the CWHds1.

Page 89 of 104

(2) Construction of rock quarries and gravel pits under authority of forest tenure where the development will be located immediately adjacent to existing roads under tenure and will affect the OGMA by <0.5 ha. (3) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total. (4) Where OGMA replacement forest is required as a result of activities under 3 (1) or (2), it must be of equivalent or better quality and quantity and be identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved. OGMA replacement areas must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the DDM at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval. 4. Permissible Activities for Safety Purposes: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes. (2) Felling of guyline clearance, tailhold anchor trees, or danger trees (except high value wildlife trees) along cutblock boundaries or within the right of way on new road/bridge alignments to meet safety requirements.

(1) WTPs must be well distributed across the BEC subzone and located within or immediately adjacent to a cutblock. (2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention. (3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below. (4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target. (5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees). (6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees). (7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC subzone in the Tretheway Landscape Unit.

BEC Subzone % Wildlife Tree Retention CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 10 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist 6 submaritime) MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 2

Page 90 of 104

WEST HARRISON LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES – (Order Efective as of June 24, 2005)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the West Harrison Landscape Unit.

Objective 1 1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the West Harrison Landscape Unit map dated December 2, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

(4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs #3, 10, 19, 37, 99, 101, 124 and the mapped old forest portion of all OGMAs in CWHdm.

Page 91 of 104

(3) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

(4) Where OGMA replacement forest is required as a result of activities under 3 (1) or (2), it must be of equivalent or better quality and quantity and be identified in order of priority, 1) immediately adjacent to the existing OGMA, or 2) in the same variant and landscape unit as the existing OGMA; such that OGMA ecological attributes and spatial distribution are maintained or improved. OGMA replacement areas must be documented, mapped and submitted to the satisfaction of the DDM at the end of each calendar year for his/her approval. Note add 145, 54, 126 road construction. 4. Permissible Activities for Safety Purposes: (1) Maintenance, deactivation, removal of danger trees, or brushing and clearing on existing roads under active tenure within the right-of-way for safety purposes.

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

Page 92 of 104

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEC Subzone in the West Harrison FDU

BEC Subzone % Wildlife Tree Retention CWH dm (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry maritime) 14 CWH vm (Coastal Western Hemlock, very wet maritime) 14 MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 13

Page 93 of 104

YALE LU LEGAL OBJECTIVES - (Order Efective as of February 3, 2005)

First Nations traditional use of forest resources, treaty negotiations or settlements will not be limited by the following objectives.

Legal Objectives Pursuant to Section 4 of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the following are the landscape unit objectives for the Yale Landscape Unit.

Objective 1

1. Maintain or recruit old growth forests in established old growth management areas (OGMAs), as shown on the revised Yale Landscape Unit map dated October 1st, 2004, and as amended from time to time, subject to timber harvesting and road construction in accordance with section 2, 3 and 4 below.

(4) The provisions in section 2 (1) and (2) do not apply to the following OGMAs #25, 26, 38.

3. Permissible Activities:

Page 94 of 104

(3) Intrusions, other than those specified, that affect an OGMA by less than 0.5 hectare in total.

(2) Each cutblock >10 ha in size must have a minimum of 2% wildlife tree retention.

(3) No timber harvesting, including single tree selection, is to occur within WTPs for at least one rotation, except as noted in (4) below.

(4) Salvage of windthrown timber and harvesting of remaining standing stems is only permitted within WTPs where catastrophic windthrow exceeds 50% of the dominant or co-dominant stems; or where forest health issues pose a significant threat to areas outside the WTP. Where salvage/harvesting is planned and authorized, replacement WTP of equivalent or better quality and quantity must be identified immediately to achieve the retention target.

(5) WTPs must include, if present, remnant old growth patches and live or dead veteran trees (excluding danger trees).

(6) WTPs must include representative larger trees for the stand and any moderate to high value wildlife trees (excluding danger trees).

(7) Where differences exist between mapped and actual BEC subzones, subzones will be confirmed by site plan information.

Page 95 of 104

Table A. Wildlife Tree Retention by BEO and BEC Subzone for the Yale FDU.

BEC Subzones % Wildlife Tree Retention CWH ds (Coastal Western Hemlock, dry submaritime) 5 CWH ms (Coastal Western Hemlock, moist submaritime) 8 MH mm (Mountain Hemlock, moist maritime) 5

Page 96 of 104

Appendix D:

Recreation Trails and Interpretative Forest Objectives

Contents

1. Guidance document for Established Recreation Trails with Legal Objectives in the Chilliwack River Valley 2. Mission Interpretative Forest Site 3. Baby Munday Recreation Trail 4. Elk-Thurston Recreation Trail 5. Ford Mountain Recreation Trail 6. Ling Lake Recreation Trail 7. Mount Cheam Recreation Trail 8. Mount McGuire Recreation Trail 9. Mount Rexford Recreation Trail 10. Pierce Lake Recreation Trail 11. Slesse Memorial Recreation Trail 12. Slesse Mountain Recreation Trail 13. Vedder Mountain Recreation Trail 14. Williams Peak Recreation Trail 15. Williamson Lake Recreation Trail

Page 97 of 104

Blank page

Page 98 of 104 Guidance Document for Established Recreation Trails with Legal Objectives in the Chilliwack River Valley Guidance – High value trail 1. Preserve the integrity of the forested, scenic and natural recreation experience associated with the high value recreation trail. Measure/Indicator Targets/actions 1.1 Road crossings • no more than one (may require permit from Archaeology Branch and Recreation Sites and Trails) • perpendicular to trail if practicable • minimize width as practicable • deactivate as soon as practicable 1.2 Negative impacts to tread • none surface 1.3 Changes to trail location • none 1.4 Alteration of adjacent vegetation • none within 100 meters Guidance- Moderate-high value trail 2. Retain the moderate and high value recreation opportunities associated with Elk-Thurston Trail, Mount Cheam Trail Pierce Lake Trail and Vedder Mountain Trail taking into consideration the scenic and natural setting of the trail. Measure/Indicator Targets/actions 2.1 Road crossings • Minimized to no more than one permanent crossing for each 1 km section of trail. • Active temporary crossings permitted one per trail, removal prior to 6 months after planting • Limit access to trail by outdoor by recreational vehicles by use of barriers (boulders, trenches, coarse woody debris etc) 2.2 Negative Impacts to tread • maintain and/or construct trail tread to provide surface continuous access to trail 2.3 Changes to trail location • minimize to localized areas within trail right-of- way 2.4 Alteration of adjacent vegetation • No more than 25% of trail right-of-way timber volume disturbed over free to grow period within the TLHB. Guidance-moderate value trail 3. Provide continued opportunity for a recreation experience utilising the trail known as Slesse Memorial Trail (trail portions outside heritage reserve). Measure/Indicator Targets/actions 3.1 Road crossings • minimize as practicable • perpendicular to trail where practicable • prevent access to trail by outdoor recreational vehicles 3.2 Negative Impacts to tread • maintain and/or construct trail tread to provide surface continuous access to trail 3.3 Changes to trail location • relocation of localized portions as necessary within trail right-of-way 3.4 Alteration of adjacent vegetation • consider opportunities of retention adjacent to trail

Guidance- low-moderate value trail 4. Provide continued opportunity for use of the recreation trail known as Williamson Lake Trail, Williams Peak Trail, Mount Rexford Trail, Mount McGuire Trail, Ling Lake Trail, Ford Mountain Trail Baby Munday Trail and Slesse Mountain Trail. Measure/Indicator Targets/actions 4.1 Road crossings • as required • prevent access to trail by outdoor recreational vehicles 4.2 Negative Impacts to tread • maintain and/or construct trail tread to provide surface continuous access to trail 4.3 Changes to trail location • localized 4.4 Alteration of adjacent vegetation • consider opportunities of retention adjacent to trail Guidance – low value trail 5. Provide opportunity for a recreation trail in the proximity of Trans-Canada Trail. Measure/Indicator Targets/actions 4.1 Road crossings • as required • prevent access to trail by outdoor recreation vehicles 4.2 Negative Impacts to tread • re-habilitate or relocate trail as necessary surface • clear debris to allow re-establishment by 3rd party 4.3 Changes to trail location • as required 4.4 Alteration of adjacent vegetation • as required •

Under the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) section 16 of the Recreation Regulation BC Regulation 16/2004 requires all industrial activity to have authorization from the District Recreation Officer. This document is considered authorization required under section 16 of the recreation regulation for the trails listed in the Chilliwack District. If a forest activity requires a variance from any of these guidelines listed please contact the District Recreation Officer for authorization. Authorization for forest activities that operate outside of these guidelines will be considered and may be given in specific situations.

of Fore,f" lands and Natural Resource On"rati".1< M MORAN UM

Mission Interpretive Forest Site (REC 1(6116)

Legi!! Olbje1cti1ifes (section 56 FRPA)

Management tnt,mt-

With the importance of to the of Mission, forest management IAlllhln Mission Interpretive Forest remains the highest priority, Forest management includes managing for the 11 Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) values: timber including forest health, soils, water, forage and associated plant communities, cultural heritage resources, recreation resources, biodiversity, resource features, fish, visual quality, and wildlife. The intent is to maintain fores! management so as to no! constrain or affect the annual allowable cut, timber harvesting objectives or visual management objectives. The Mission Interpretive Forest Site will be a model demonstrating how to integrate a working community forest with enhanced safe multi-user recreational infrastructure and educational opportunities.

objectives are:

1. Maintain the quality of the experience of forest recreation activities; Maintain or enhance where the interpretive qualities of site.

Regional Coast Recreation Region

File: 16660-04 106116 (Mission) Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 56(1) of the Forest and Range Practices Act the following Recreation Sites and Recreation Trails are hereby established on Crown Land.

Chilliwack

Recreation Project File As shown on Exhibit A dated

16660-20/106523 January 18,2010

16660-20/166971 February 10, 2012

16660-20/0358 January 14,2010

16660-20/3082 March 1,2010

16660-20/3071 April 8, 2010

16660-20/1 06525 February 16,2010

16660-20/106575 February 16, 2010

16660-20/3081 January 18,2010

16660-20/6877 January 18,2010

16660-20/0342 October 19,2010

16660-20/106514 February 16, 2010

16660-20/1 06768 February 17, 2010

Page 1 Name of Recreation Trail Name of Recreation Site Recreation Project File As shown on Exhibit A dated

Tikwalus 16660-20/166219 November 4,2011

Vedder Mountain 16660-20/0350 January 18,2010

Williams Peak 16660-20/0362 February 22,2010

Williamson Lake 16660-20/3075 January 18,2010

Peers CreeklHBC Trail (Recreation 16660-20/156639 January 7,2011 Site) Sowaqua CreeklHBC Trail 16660-20/160429 February 28,2011 (Recreation Site) Sumallo 16660-20/160421 February 21,2011 $fJ~ Gary Townsend, Assistant Deputy Minister Integrated Resources Operations Division Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Recreation Sites BHITISH d '"l: "I )( , COLUM BIA an Iral s ()

MEMORANDUM

Baby Munday Recreation Trail (RECI06523) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supp011ing recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features HandbookJor Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices Jor ForestlY (March 16, 2007).

The intent of the objectives is to give the individual additional guidance on how to manage for the recreation values of the trail. Objectives are written in the paradigm of addressing the tenure holder.

Management Intent The Baby Munday Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive, non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up into the alpine, providing access to the central area of the Cheam Range.

Objectives I. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking through a forested and sub-alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all ~ed vehicles from accessing the trail. , U () V -1_' ~ [~j)j.,

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region jJ . Effective date: 6:-.fcsit/> I~ 2--0/ 2-

File: 16660-20 REC 106523 (Baby Munday Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated January 18, 2010

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T6E9 - IllUTISH • e CCOLUMIJIA Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A ~ MAP OF : REC106S23SIby Munday Trail (shown In bold black) N

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA: 30 PULPWOOD AGREEMENT: MGT UNIT TYPE: FOREST DISTRICT : DCK LAND DISTRICT: ChirrlW(lck Forest MGT UNIT NO : WJt~E District ,,~( ESF SUBMISSION ID : 783084 SCALE: 1:20000 al A SiO:8 UlM: 10 DRAWN BY : FTA BGGS MAPSHEET NO: 92H.012 Length (Km): 2.626 NAD : NADe3 DATE: Jan 18, 2010 •

Legend

851(,&2 "'" C TenIJ(e ApplIcation Tenure Road AppIcetlon I _ H ....i- Rwed TflI'IIXo Road r o'·""" .. y 0 ",,,,/ 1 « PofC PofT I' E A ,( ... 0 TonunI fealwo R.",. 8162&1. 0 ,( N I a / H , 0 TH 0 Provhdll Forest S " " • , t // Forest Service Road II " II V " E A ~ a I . C ' • , /" /" ...MlKlIcIpIl ROld I1Gfl~2 // Non- stilus R03d , , , . Reaeallon Trails "'"'// ROld PelTnit , " , // SUP Road /' Righi of Way Sd'oecIu ~. B CP RM(! " MineraI Terue Point, • e... v;/ W'teltlodiea 0 r RlvetlStream Coaslfne' Island 1"'"' (2 .628 Km) porc UTM10 599898, 5444668 PorT UTM10 599806, 54 4664 5

r h I

, , " , , ,, , , -; , "' .... / -pOK.~, ,," , ,...... - ... - " .~~> '" " , ,/, '~ , ()'\-;! /' ..( COLUMBIA an d'-rIral 'I s )

MEMORANDUM

Elk-Thurston Recreation Trail (REC0358) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbook/or Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices/or ForestlY (March 16,2007).

Management Intent The Elk-Thurston Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. The trail was originally a route used to access berry picking areas. This trail is the most popular trail in the upper Fraser Valley. It begins within a second growth forest and continues onto a ridge-walk tIu-ough the sub-alpine leading to Elk Mountain, thence to Mount Thurston.

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: Ok I (~ 2-012.-- 7 File: 16660-20 REC0358 (Elk-Thurston) Attachment: Exhibit A dated January 14, 2010

Ministry of Forests, lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 Labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreatiorl Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 BRmSH ..... COWMBIA Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC0358 Amondmont'1 Elk_Thurston Tnlil (shown In bold black) FOREST REGION : RCO TSA : 30 PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST DISTRICT : OCt< LAND DISTRICT : Chijliwack Forost District MGT UNIT NO : ESf SUBMISSION JD : 782306 SCAlE : 1: 20000 at B Size UTM : 10 DRAWN BY : FTA BeGS MAPSHEET NO: 92H.012 length (Km): 7.S1S NAn : NAD83 DATE : Jan 14, 2010

Legend

r_~,., "'" _,• .' · :1. ... 11 C .""' .. , 1_~ AppIIrMCIn ...... ~" , .-' _r..... _ "« '..,"' ... '.. ,. ,. •Cl l_r_ Cl I Cl ~ Cl -_.- ( // "-$cr\oIc>oRO.:I -- ...... ,"" I••• // ",0. - r-- // ----,- ..--ItI;IIICIIWoy_T - __ • w_~"C#JIOIId Cl -....-. I " ~,- EU<-lHURST'" (7.51" Krn) Pole un-no 586079. 5439782 ) !'f/~ .~ ~ ./ porr UTM10 590272. 5440031 I / ' t==~ 1 :~$- ·· 0 " .~", 4/1 ----«C:;::j~, " ::Bf!! ,?' .- / ~: y) ) If( \ \ - 1-~ ~--+/ ~-+) ~\.;:---,

~ " . I "-_:, / / " .- Recreation Sites BRITISII d '"T"! °1 l (' COLUMBIA an Iral s )

MEMORANDUM

Ford Mountain Recreation Trail (REC3082) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbookfor Be, Appendix 2- Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices for Forestry (March 16, 2007).

Management Intent The Ford Mountain Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up in elevation to Ford Mountain, the site of a long-since burned Forest Service Lookout tower.

Objectives 1. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking tlu-ough a forested and sub-alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail. )~ /q-Vc£'~ Paul Tataryn ~ Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region Effective date: esc i (D, 2-0( ~ I File: 16660-20 REC3082 (Ford Mountain Trail) Attaclmlent: Exhibit A dated March 1, 2010

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 Labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF FORESTS AND RANGE EXHIBIT A

MAP OF REC3082 Ford Mountain Trail (Shown in bold black) FOREST REGION : RCO ITSA: 30· Fraser IPULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE: Timber Supply Area FOREST DISTRICT : DCK LAND DISTRICT : New Westminsler MGT UNIT NO : 30 ZONE : 10 '83

Excluding Thereout:

'" ~f!>''1.~

\ t'\\~", ~~"... ') \ /' /.// / .\ ~so'l'\' /,/' ./ \ ,/...... \ :v RI"l\ .:--< /' ./ \ r ./>~// //" .- ..// /' ( I REC3082 I \\ \ I ..... \1 s,,_ ___ •,.- " Sec I, TP <7. 15 FOrd 41.~ 2, Rge2S °o,

3780331

take ~

J914)6 ~~~~ R~l\ ~ 0 I -\' ...., ~~ R

410245 Recreation Sites BRIT ISII ~ (1(' COLUM BI A an d Ira!'1 s J

MEMORANDUM

Ling Lake Recreation Trail (RECI06525) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 ofthe Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various suppOlting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbook/or Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices/or ForestlY (March 16, 2007).

Management Intent The Ling Lake Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive, non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up in elevation to Ling Lake.

Objectives I. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking through a forested and sub-alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a maimer that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail.

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: 6 c + (0 ).0(2- 7 File: 16660-20 REC 106525 (Ling Lake Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated February 16, 2010

Ministry of Forests, lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 l abieux Road Nalural Resource Operations Coast Recreation RegIon Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 I ~ \ ) , ----

~------... o ( -o"T1 r r iil ~~ : .. . / . .,- , ::l a. .,;0 ::l «> co ~ - )j) /

m X I , CD =i ~ ·4· -~ ~ Recreation Sites BIUTISI I d'"T: 'I )(' COl.UMlllil an lral s )

MEMORANDUM

Mount Cheam Recl'eation Trail (RECI06575) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forestlrange land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbookfor Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices for ForestlY (March 16, 2007).

Management Intcnt The Mount Cheam Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This heavily used, popular trail showcases coastal sub alpine and alpine ecology and leads to the peak of Mount Cheam, from which there are spectacular views of the upper Fraser Valley.

Objcctives I. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking through a sub-alpine and alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail.

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: d {- /(9 ).-.()(2- 7 File: 16660-20 REC106575 (Mount Cheam) Attachment: Exhibit A dated February 16, 20 I 0

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 labieux Road Natural Resource OperaJlons Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC106575 Mount Cheam Trail (shown in bold black)

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA : 30 PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST DISTRICT : DCK LAND DISTRICT : Chilliwack Forest MGT UNIT NO : District 5 ESF SUBMISSION ID : 788077 SCALE : 1:15000 at C Size UTM : 10 DRAWN BY : FTA BCGS MAPSHEET NO : 92H.012 Area (Ha): 77.496 NAD : NAD83 DATE : Feb 16, 2010

Legend , Tenure Application Tenure Road Application Retired Tenure Road • pole P ofT Tenure FeatlJre Range TFL Provincial Forest c A " Forest Service Road , A , Highway Munidpal Road Non Status Road Recreation Trails Road Permit SUP Road Right otWay Schedule B CP Road Mineral Tenure Points

C~ies Waterbodies RiverlStream Coastline I Island (77.496 Ha) PofC1 UTM10 596203, 5448641

L A y

, A ,

, , ,

,, " , , , ,, , , A L D , " , ",, , , , , , ,, ,

------....

, , , , , , T 0 , , L A D G , " ,, " ,, , ,, , , , , , , '-,, .... ----

381m Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC3109 Mount Cheam Trail Amendment # 1 (shown in bold black)

FOREST REGION : RSI TSA : PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST DISTRICT : DCS LAND DISTRICT : MGT UNIT NO :

ESF SUBMISSION ID : 160855 SCALE : 1:15000 at C Size UTM : 10 RE-DRAWN BY : FTA 5 BCGS MAPSHEET NO : 92H.012 Length (Km): 8.1218 NAD : NAD83 DATE : Dec 30, 2009

Legend Dl7""

Tenure Application Tenure Road Application Retired Tenure Road • pole P ofT M,"", Tenure FeatlJre ""225" Range TFL Provincial Forest c " A " Forest Service Road , , A , Highway Munidpal Road Non Status Road Recreation Trails Road Permit SUP Road Right otWay Schedule B CP Road Mineral Tenure Points

C~ies Waterbodies RiverlStream Coastline I Island 1 (8.1218 Km) PofC UTM10 596203,5448641 PofT UTM10 596142, 5448781

L A y

, , A ,

D G

, , , ff

" ," , ,, , , , A L D , " , , , , , , ,, , , ,, , , , ,, ,, , , ,, ,, ,, ,, """'"

, , ,

,, ------... -'" ~ 'l?2Q-oe.~~c.aE;f ~_ , , , '------, , ,, " ',o, ~ , ,, , T 0 , L A D G " , " ,,

, , , , , , ,

, , , ----- , , , ,, 381m Recreation Sites BRIT ISH d'r '1 1)( ' COLUM UI A an Ira! s ") J

MEMORANDUM

Mount McGuire Recreation Trail (REC3081) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbook/or Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices/or Forestry (March 16, 2007).

Management Intent The Mount McGuire Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-roaded, non motorized, hiking and caving recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up in elevation to the alpine. This area, being limestone, contains many significant caves.

Objectives I. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking tlu'ough a forested and sub-alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail.

Paul~ Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: d = l rtf 2c7{ 2-- 7 File: 16660-20 REC3081 (Mount McGuire Trail) Attaclunent: Exhibit A dated January 18,2010

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T6E9 nn rnSH ....CO LUMUl h Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A Q) MAP OF : RECl081 Mount McGuire Trail Amendment # l(shown In bold black)

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA:30 PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT n'PE : FOREST DISTRICT : DCK lAND DISTRICT . Ch il~ wack Forest MGT UNIT NO : Dislrict w4· • ESF SUBMISSION 10 : 782874 SCALE: 1:20000 at C Size UTM : 10 DRAWN BY : FTA BCGS MAPSHEE T NO : 92H.OO2 length (Krn): 14.2 NAO : NA083 DATE: Jan 18. 2010

legend • C T..... __ N T_ __ \' ...'-, ..... '-- ...:( ~ .. c: "' - .~ .... ,...... Po" """;" ." " oCJ T_...... , -. - ,.- CJ CI "-_ // F ...... _ ....' -...... ~- " / / -,-_ ...... 1 .,.ow.,~- _19.~_ • "'~_' ...n""'" ..-:; " . ;'CJ _. "'" c_~,_ 1 (142 KrIll Po.'C un.no 5901315. 50136693 \ \ l¢J j ~' /~ , . PdT UTM10 ~ .. !>t1. !>t319Oa i , j' l \ /j I ...... J-.. ~ \~ 1,.... (. ~( . r \ /) ~J ,': ~ ( , , t "'",. , ,, \ ; :, 1-.' , '-,'~-. ", ' ". 5], \ .-. ,,,,<::,t,,.)/1 ./ " -. ~ ~ . .... J ~ '1 "'- 1 '-, ./J.;: " ( _ ./;7 , "j "" ~7; .~/ l ... ,.. ",~:,,:\ .'' :, 11, .' (/ -z: - I M" .\ ; ' / ~ ,y r \ '\\ I .. \.'\. ,~, ,~ ,;~~.({:./------~'~.,<" 'r..::-~~ . "'// ~.----- ...I ;- _ ...i ( -;// '(i- I (' ;, c ~_ ) II r' / /; ( l, \ /' "/ --r' )'--~_ / ~, \ . ~-. - " ,,--.,"' (' . .\' ~ / 'r--" ~. ~I ; 'i l./', ~( ~'~l \~~J .. ' ')) ,1/ ..... >{f - UrI .. _-) -1 /( ! ~ / ) (,:.. . Recreation Sites BRIT ISH lJ(' COLUMBI A and'T: Ira! '1 s )

MEMORANDUM

Mount Rexford Recreation Trail (REC6877) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention offocussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forestirange land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbookfor Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices for ForestlY (March 16,2007).

Management Intent The Mount Rexford Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive, non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up in elevation to Mount Rexford. The trail also provides access to the Illusion Peaks.

~~d "' i:~"g "dmiL

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: Oc f- /~ 20(2- 7 File: 16660-20 REC6877 (Mount Rexford Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated January 18, 20 I 0

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 Labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation RegIon Nanaimo, B.C. V9T6E9 BRmSH • $ • COLUMBIA Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC6877 Mount Rexford Amendment # 2 (shown in bold black)

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA: 30 PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UN IT TYPE: FOREST DISTRICT: DCK LAND DISTRICT : Chilliwack Forest District MGT UNIT NO :

ESF SUBMISSION 10 : 783017 SCALE: 1 :20000 at A Size UTM : 10 DRAWN BY : FT A BeGS MAPSHEET NO : 92H.OO3 Length (Km): 2.387 NAD : NAD83 DATE: Jan 18, 2010

Legend

C Tenuro AppllcatlDn ,., Tenure Ro.d AppliCation ..' Reared Tenure Road •<{ pofe .... PotT 0 T~ """'" '.~----- 0 0 m."""" , 0 PtovinciaI Forut F' Fonm SeMco Road I I ~ Highway I ~ Municipal Road , // \ \ r' ----ReaNtion Trails I ;/ ;/ SUP_ ;/ --Rightofw.., // PofT Schedule B CP Road .. MInInI Tenure PoInts • ~ 0 WltcrOOdies " , r ~JStream r' ~Ioo Iialand 1 (2.387 Km) PofC UTM10 605187, 5432619 porr VTM1 0 606985, 5432529

, , , , , \ \ \ , , ,

o , m ) / Recreation Sites BRITISII d'T' 'I \)(' COLUM BIA an Ira! s ) j

MEMORANDUM

Pierce Lake Recreation Trail (REC0342) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention offocussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbook/or Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices/or Foresfly (March 16, 2007).

Management Intent The Pierce Lake Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest as it continues on to the lower and upper Pierce Lakes and thereafter to the summit of Mount MacFarlane.

Objectives I. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking through a forested and subalpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail.

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: t- -f it) 2cJ /2- ( File: 16660-20 REC0342 (Pierce Lake Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated October 19,2010

Ministry of Forests, lands and Recreation Sites and Trails BC 2100 labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 BRmSH ..... COWMBlA Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC0342 Pierce lake Trail Amendment # 2 (shown In bold bl ~ c: k)

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA: PUlPWOODAGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST DISTRlCT : DCK LAND DISTRICT : Chi ll iwack Forost District MGT UNIT NO :

ESF SUBMISSION 10: 841457 SCALE : 1:20000 at C Size UTM : 10 DRAWN BY: FTA BCGS MAPSHEET NO : 92H.002 le~th (Km): 5.198 NAD: NAD83 DATE : Oct 19. 2010

l egend T ___ C ,-- ...'",.- ,., ... -'., ' '-- OJ __ "_ --, \ OJ OJ "' -~\ OJ - " ------" ~ ~ ------,- " ~ \ ,-'--' ___..., go_ '.~-p- -,~ -- j -- -- , o -,-- ) ) OJ... - / ~ ':-1,_ ) , (5., eS Kml- PetC UTM10 S~725. !IoI37673 P(oITUTM10 &004:10. 54353900 \ ~ J/ Il ( ) ,\ /\ ( --/~---- ! 1 \ ~

( ~ ( f I ) "" I " /'- I .../------~ --7 ~ \1 >- ~ , '- ~ .- ~

"...... -

/ Recreation Sites BHlT ISH Il(' COLUMBIA an d'r.Iral 'I s

MEMORANDUM

Slesse Memorial Recreation Trail (RECI06514) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various suppol1ing recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbookfor Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices for ForestlY (March 16, 2007).

Management Intent The Siesse Memorial Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. Two routes are used to access the sub-alpine and a memorial for a 1956 plane crash. It also accesses one of the ' 50 Classic Climbs of North America'. The trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up to the sub-alpine on Siesse Peak.

Objectives I. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking through a forested and sub-alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structUl'es unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail.

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: -flO: 2012- a ( File: 16660-20 REC 106514 (Slesse Memorial Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated February 16, 2010

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 Labieux Road Naturat Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 o"T1 iil UI -UI I\> =Q. ;0 =I\> ""'"

m X I OJ =i ~ ".Jt, . ~ ~ Recreation Sites BRIT ISH d 'T' 'I I) C' COLUMBIA an Ira! s ) J

MEMORANDUM

Slesse Mountain Recreation Trail (RECI06768) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention offocussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various suppOlting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbook/or Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices/or Foreslly (March 16,2007).

Management Intent The Slesse Mountain Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-motorized, non-roaded, hiking experience. This popular trail provide mountain climbers access to a well-know mountain climbing area.

Objectives 1. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking tlU'ough a forested and sub-alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a maimer that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail.

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: Uc -i to ~cJ ( 2- 7 File: 16660-20 REC106768 (Slesse Mountain Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated February 17,2010

Mlnlshyof Forests, lands and Recreation Sites and Tralls Be 2100 labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation RegIon Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 BRmSH -.-COLUMBIA Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC106768 Sklsso Mountain Tra il (shoWn In bold blaek) FOREST REGION : ReO TSA : PULPWOOO AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST OISTRICT: DCK LAND DISTRICT : Chlaiwack Forest Distrid MGT UNIT NO : ESF SUBMISSION 10: 794745 SCAlE : 1:20000 3\ B Size UTM; 10 DRAWN BY : FTA BCGS MAPSHEET NO ; 92H.002 Length (Km): 5.943 NAn: NAD83 DATE : Feb 17. 2010

Legend

t:l T-" ~"" ,., T.... _~ .-' _T __ ....« ,.,'"' Cl T_ r_ 1 Cl Cl ~ Cl - // r' -- r' ---""'nloipol" .... // -Non$\8U ~ '" r' // -,- ./ ~ - --fIWII",w"1 _T_ _ • smoot../Io8CPFad Cl ~- -- ,. r' - r' - 1 (5.943 Km)-,- PetC UTM IO 598951 , 5431497 ( PerT UTM 10 602103. 5431306 I 1/ / /, \.. (/ ./! I ( j () /~~+-~~~ I I " _ / ~ '~ IJ ,~'-f-.--.-.._ --1 / / )j/ Recreation Sites BRIT ISH 11(' COLUM I3I A an d'"l":Ira! 'I s )

MEMORANDUM

Vedder Mountain Recl'eation Trail (REC0350) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbook/or Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices/or ForestlY (March 16,2007).

Managemcnt Intent The Vedder Mountain Recreation Trail is being managed as patt of a semi-primitive, multiple use recreation trail network. There will be segregated motorized and non-motorized trails within the overall trail area. This area is heavily used by hikers, mountain bikers, equestrians, ATV users and motorized bikers. The trail is a non-motorized hiking trail along Vedder Ridge.

Objcctives 1. Maintain the unique recreation experience of trail riding and hiking tlu-ough a forested setting; 2. Avoid building access structures onto critical non-motorized trails unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effort to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail. cdY ~/Q-tz

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

Effective date: Oc flo. ZCJ( 2-- 7 File: 16660-20 REC0350 (Vedder Mountain Trail) Attacl=ent: Exhibit A dated November 4, 2011

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T BE9 BRmSH • S • COLUMBIA Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC03S0 Vedder Mountain Trail Amendment # 3 (shown in bold black)

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA: 30 PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST DISTRICT : OCK LAND DISTRICT : Chilliwack Forest District MGT UNIT NO :

ESF SUBMISSION ID : 783041 SCALE: 1 :20000 at A Size UTM : 10 DRAWN BY : FT A BeGS MAPSHEET NO : 92G.010 Length (Km): 5.023 NAD: NADa3 DATE : Jan 18, 2010

Legend

C Tenuro Application ,., Tenur. Ro.d Application •~. RetIred Tenure Road « PofC ... PoIT 0 TeNA'i Fearure 0 0 "'''''TFL 0 Provincial Forut // FOI'OISt ScrvIeo Road ~ M__ ~ ... ;/ Non- ...... /'" RocreaIIion T* // Road PennI // """..., // R1glJtotWey // SchlKlule 8 CP Ro.cI MInefaJ Tenure Points • Co.. 0 Waleltlodle$ ;-/ RillerlS1ream /'" CouIIlne I Island 1 (5.023 Km) PofC UTM10 572214, 5435087 PofT UTM10 569822, 5433828 Recreation Sites BRITIS H COLUMBIA an d'r.·1Iral s ()(')

MEMORANDUM

Williams Peak Recreation Tt'ail (REC0362) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section 56 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbook/or Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices/or ForestlY (March 16, 2007).

Management Intent The Williams Peak Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive, non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up in elevation to Williams Ridge where climbers can continue to the summit..

~ /) . aJ ' 4-&)/b,

Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region

EffectivedateUC'f (0 2-dlZ- 7 File: 16660-20 REC0362 (Williams Peak Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated February 22, 2010

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Recreation Sites and Trails BC 2100 Labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 BRmSH ....COL t.:MBIA Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A

MAP OF : REC0362 Williams Peak Trail Amendment 1# 3 (sho"Wn In bold black)

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA : PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST DISTRICT : DCK LAND DISTRICT : Chilliw3ck Forost District MGT UNIT NO :

ESF SUBMISSION 10 : 782892 SCALE : 1:20000 31 C SIze UTM : 10 DRAWN BY : FTA BeGS MAPSHEET NO : 92H,0 13 Length (Km): 6.177 NAD: NADa3 OATE : Feb 22, 2010

! I , Legend ' ! \ \ ,f - , ~ /' /' --- T..... __ ~ ,/ C '\ ( ------'- ,--_ 1__ ,.'"" .. , ~ '"' \\. /)~7:J~ ..""c:J ' .... F_ '~ / c:J / c:J .. "- !'-" c f .-/ / c:J - , ,7 \ // r-- • " ------" ------,- .". , ... " / --~__- 0' _ / _.- /~~ '-> • - ,-- '- c:J ~ - '~ I ...... -~ . - /. , (s.,n Krn) j / / / PafC UlloU0 606"O. !i0439143 PofT 1JT\I'0 6Ol9U. $4421$11 "- ~/ \. V -- I ... I ~ -/' JI ~ --- \' j \' ) J ,/ '------. \\ -\ I ~ I j ~ , ~ / I ~. , \ \ \ ! V ) ( / ) ::::, \ I ! ,~ , \ ;' ~ - I ~~~ 'I , 1/ , f- \ \ .' ", '~ ',' \ \

.~ J J / I ( Recreation Sites BR ITIS H COLUMBIA an d'-rIra! '1 s 1). ( ,

MEMORANDUM

Williamson Lake Recreation Trail (REC3075) Legal Objectives (section 56, FRPA)

Under the authority of section S6 of the Forest and Range Practises Act, the following objectives are hereby established for this Recreation Trail.

The Management Intent statement describes the recreational values and use of the trail with the intention of focussing the individual who will be writing the results and strategies. The forest/range land manager is also guided by various supporting recreation management documents, including, among others, the Recreation Features Handbooklor Be, Appendix 2 - Recreation Trails - Best Management Practices lor ForestlY (March 16, 2007).

Management Intent The Williamson Lake Recreation Trail is being managed for a semi-primitive non-roaded, non motorized, hiking recreation experience. This popular trail begins within a second growth forest and continues up in elevation to Williamson Lake providing access to Mounts Welch and Foley.

Objectives 1. Maintain the unique recreation experience of hiking through a forested and sub-alpine setting; 2. Avoid building access structures unless no other practicable alternative exists; and 3. Maintain any new access structures in a manner that makes the best effOli to prevent all motorized vehicles from accessing the trail. ~(r Paul Tataryn Regional Manager Coast Recreation Region Effective date: Uc I-- (cfl ;2 tJ /2- .' File: 16660-20 REC307S (Williamson Lake Trail) Attachment: Exhibit A dated January 18, 2010

Ministry of Forests, lands and Recreation Sites and Trails Be 2100 Labieux Road Natural Resource Operations Coast Recreation Region Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 BR ITISH ·,.COLUMBI A Ministry of Forests and Range EXHIBIT A (0 MAP OF: REC3076 Williams Lake Trail Amendment # 2 (shown In bold black)

FOREST REGION : RCO TSA ; 30 PULPWOOD AGREEMENT : MGT UNIT TYPE : FOREST DISTRICT : OCK LAND DISTRICT: Chilliw;!ck fOfest MGT UNIT NO: 01sLrk:t W~~E ESF SUBMISSION to : 783029 SCAlE: 1:20000 lit A Sil;8 UTM : 10 DRAWN BY: FTA BeGS MAPSHEET NO : 92H.OIJ Langill (Km): 3.465 NAO : NADa3 DATE: Jan 18, 2010 •

!.------Legend C Tenure A9Pb1lon H TenI.NG Road AppDcItson ..,.. ... Retired Terue Road

, -,/,

/ I -- I

., .,0 . , , \\)~ • ~\ ~(. '0 !508m ",\~~ -

Appendix E:

DM Letters defining Scenic Areas in the Chilliwack District

 Original letter, October 1, 1999  Confirmation letter, October 17, 2005  Amendment Order, April 12, 2013

Page 99 of 104

Blank page

Page 100 of 104

Distribution: Gene Macinnes, Operations Manager; Douglas Campbell, Tenures Officer, Lloyd Davies, Regional Landscape Forester; Jacques Marc, Provincial Landscape Forester; Document name: G:\!Workgrp\,Stewardship\Visual\LicenseeLetter GARs17-0c105.doc LS

File: 16290-01 19500-09

October 17,2005

All Forest Licensees, Timber Licensees and Woodlot Licensees

Dear SirIMadam:

Re: Continuation of existing Visual Quality Classes as Visual Quality Objectives under the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA).

The purpose of this letter is to clarify visual management in the Chilliwack Forest District under FRPA. Some important changes have occurred and to assist with your planning activities, I will specify the relevant sections of FRPA and its regulations that apply to scenic areas and visual quality objectives.

Scenic areas were previously made known and established under the Forest Practices Code of British Colzrmbia (FPC). The scenic areas were described in a letter signed by the District M Manager on October 1, 1999 and are continued under FRPA section 180. Copies of the letter v~ZOIO are available on the web at httu:llwww.for.~ov.bc.ca/dcWli~n/dckfs~.html. Scroll down to Visual Landscape Inventory.

Visual Quality Objectives (VQO) can be established or carried fonvard in various ways under FRPA. I have reviewed the scenarios available and have concluded that the applicable circumstance for the Chilliwack Forest District is to continue the existing recommended Visual Quality Classes (rVQC) into VQOs under the Governnrent Actions Regztlntion (GAR), section 1 7.

In GAR section 17, a visual quality class (VQC) is continued as a visual quality objective if the VQC has been set out before October 24,2002 in a letter from the district manager to forest licensees and the VQC were in existence when the regulation came into force.

Page 1 of 2

Ministry of Chilliwack Forest District Location: Mailing Address: Forests 46360 Airport Road, Chilliwadc 46360 Airport Road Chilliwack, BC V2P 1A5 Tel: (604) 702-5700 Fax: (604) 702-5711 Toll Free: 1-800-663-7867 a -J

.'IL" ~ I have concluded that the above conditions were met based on the following reasons:

The District Manager's letter of October 1, 1999 states the requirements for managing scenic areas under the FPC. The rVQC categories were developed and used to determine the acceptable level of activity to manage and conserve the visual values in known scenic areas.

Since the October 1, 1999 letter, the rVQCs have been used by licensees in their operational plan development by following the district's Standard Operating Procedures for Visttal Resource Management. It is clear that the statutory decision maker considered the rVQCs in his decisions for visual management of the Forest Development Plans.

Given the above reasons, I have concluded that it is appropriate to manage the visual resource in the Chilliwack Forest District under the Government Actions Regulation, section 17. 7. r- When developing your Forest Stewar4 s ip Plan (FSP), you are required to identify the scenic areas and to specify results or strategies for the visual objective set under GAR, section 17. Results or strategies for visual objectives can be 'certified by a qualified professional.

Visual management has changed under FRPA with an emphasis on approved results or strategies in FSPs. We will monitor the implementation of these changes on your operations and on the visual resource. When necessary, scenic area boundaries and established VQOs can be amended under the Government Actions Regulation (GAR).

For your use, I have attached the recently released FRPA Bulletin "Managing Visual Resources". It addresses the recent changes in visual management. If you would like to discuss any of the above items, please contact Lucy Stad or Jack Sweeten, Stewardship Foresters.

Yours truly,

District Manager

Attachment: FRPA General Bulletin #9 "Managing Visual Resources"

Page 2 of 2 BRITISH• COLUMBIA

File: 10285-301Fraser TSA

Date: April 12, 2013

Order to revise the Visual Quality Objectives and Scenic Areas within the Fraser Timber Supply Area

Pursuant to Section 7 (1) and'(2) of the Government Actions Regulation (GAR), the following revised Visual Quality Objectives and Scenic Areas are established within the Fraser Timber Supply Area, Chilliwack District, as shown on the map, dated January 31, 2013,'

This order and the visual quality objectives in this order take effect on the date the notice ofthis order is published in the Gazette,

Allan Johnsl de, RPF District Manager Chilliwack District

Ministry of Chilliwack FQrest District Location: Mailing Address: Forests, Lands and 46360 Airport Road, Chilliwack 46360 Airport Road Natural Resource Chilliwack, BC V2P 1A5 Operations Tel: (604) 702·5700 Fax: (604) 702·5711 K A K I TUNDRA L L A I LAKE C Z R E Z E K R I U E T L E D C CALTHA G E R LA C R KE E E E K E

K HEART WHISKY KLEPT ARROWHEAD LAKE F LAKE ICEBERG IGURE ELTON KHA LAKE LIZZIE LAKE JOHN D LAKE EIGHT LAKE LAKE A O RAGONFLY LAKE GEOR KWOIEK H S LAKE GE C C LAKE L R LAKE AKE K K E E W K E O I E K R E E R E C C

K SHIELDS SNAKE N LONG U HASVAEPNPHIRE L CHAOS TAO LAKE LAKE LA KOKWASKEY Y LAKE L KE RAINBO ST E LAK AKE W UKOLAIT LA N LAKE E CR KE R YSTAL LAKE LAKE O M TARNS T

122°36'0"W 122°24'0"W 122°12'0"W 122°0'0"W 121°48'0"W 121°36'0"W 121°24'0"W 121°12'0"W P 121°0'0"W

K K CHO E E CHIWA C R E E K A L DEWDR H E OP S E E I W A L LAKE S E E SALALMAKE R R N ANDER STEIN C C C B LAK T Y E R VALLEY C H A R C HAYNO O K J A R N E A W E C W E C K S L E E PARK AKE H I E LITT K LE R K C O L D E LILLOOET R K W N O E G T C T O LAK E E ZEQUA R E O C E R M E K R S C R M LA E KES A E L E K K MEHATL O 3 H CREEK PARK M W B O I L M L R E E C K Y G G L O O P A R T C R O E E K O

S L 4 P U K E E E R K C C PR C

T R A E N C E R LILY K A K H A E W N LAKE I W N A E N H Visual QualityK Objectives S E M C 7 H R E A H E E K T 8 M I C H N

A A 10 C T R T 15 5 9 E PR E L HANNAH K K PR PR M E K S Q U A K U C E C LAK 12 E A S T E M E FRANCES I L L R Fraser Timber Supply AreaR I O R C N C R LAKE 6 C E PR E C N 13 E N

" 11 N E K " R PR Y

0 A E PR 0 ' K Established under Government Action RegulationA '

W PR 18 E

0 17 O 0 D

° K

G 20 M ° D 0 R

14 0 I 5 27 PR FISHBLUE 5

M Section 7 (2) Order M LAK M 16 E 19 S N R A R E E K AHATLATCH 24 C 23 L I N 34 LAKE PR E U 33 21 PR M G 25 M K U M 26 C R E E A 32 PR 30 38 28 PR Visual Quality Objectives ClassificatioK n

G R 22 35 CABI 39 N E PR PR PR 36 M

R E LAK E R C E PR M E E K K

I PR LIGH R T E E TNING U 43 C R 37 E ModificatioLAnKE - M C A 46 I 48 M L G S M N S M NAHATLATCH 29 A I SILVER LA U 44 LAKE PARK 40 PR KE I 31 Partial Retention - PR P PR R 41 S 47 PR N 52 PR 42 O I N G S T O PR R L I V N 49 T PR H C N PR Retention - R R E K PR E A 50 T U H 56 57 M W A K T R E E A PR 60 C L 55 M Visual Sensitivity Units Revised S 54 Y U A M S 53 U 59 PR P E GILLIS S M T E K M LAKE PR C R E C C H I N R C H 65 63 L Administrative Boundaries E 62 U G K R P 58 E O I M L E PR K I 67 PR P S V E PR L E N I O PR S K E C R K R E E R U E W Forest District Boundaries C E 68 N H

T N

R 64 " 66 I H C 0 E 69 K 73

70 0 S ' 71

E ' L PR K R T E 4 T D PR E

T 4 N O PR M PR M E

5 A E O L 1018 S W I C Municipalities 5 U M U U N A R ° E G K M C L ° C A E R R O R W B I C S C Y E E 9 C B R O L R E M 9 K E E C E E T E K P K S K V A 4 A K I N S G 4 L E S I I O W E L 75 G N E E K C R E G C R U E P Z R 76 E I Provincial Park, Protected Areas and OIC Ecological Reserves U S H PR C H O E C K S G K C LACIER K PR 72 N R O R LAK A E R E E F O 78 PR K E E C S C R K E E Tree Farm Licence K E K 77 L 80 K L A PR K 74 H C R E E FIG HOSU 79 Y O R M C R E NROGWLCASASP I S E M W E K H A L L 82 LAKE E LAKE PR Land Ownership and Status C CUTOF I LOWER F 83 M LAK SNOWCAP E 84

M K LAKE Crown Grant 85 M E

E WHISKEY 81 87 M R LAKE PR 86 M C Primary Survey Parcel FIRE A H K U LAKE N A G R E E K M E R C 89

K E E R K C 90 E P E 91 S MIST E Y R U R E M C PR T I LAKE GARIBALDI N F I B A F C U Y C L O R E Z T T R D C E K R E T Produced By: Chilliwack District E K T Z H 88 Z PARK E S R C R E E K U U R C R Date: January 31, 2013 E N S 93 N " C V " 0 0 ' R R Scale: 1:150,000 I ' 8

E 8

4 R K 94 E 4 ° O E ° E K 9 92 R PR MURRAY 9 4 C 4 LAK R PR D E K E 95 E 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 E E T 96 TERRAROSA E S T LAKE PR K R U Kilometers A E C B E

98 W R E C L 97 PR D I K L LITTLE M O R O HARRISON X O I LAKE R S 101 C 102 B 100 E K M E A R E C S L L E E K PR 107 E H C R C T S I L E U 103 T R A BROOK U PR E K 105 E 106 N LA P KE ANDY O R T H C R S N S L O D Q U E T LA E KE R B 104 E K S R E U C S P PR O T C U N I E 99 Z J U L K Z 108 U R L I COLDWATER M M V I M C E N 109 R R RIVER PARK E 110 C E R M K E S T O PR N E Y C K K E PUKULKU R E E K L E LAKE E R K K C K E E K E 113 S R E H L E C E K E E A K R E C 115 PR O 118 T I K W S E N A L U

R 111 N T R "

117 " C S PR DRUM

0 M C 0 ' M ' S A 119 LAKE

T 2 E V GOLDEN Y 2 E L 4 114 L L 4 ° K M 116

C U ° R EARS PARK E E 120 J 9 E PR E K 9 E P R E E

4 PR K I K R T C C 4 E L T Y G I A E W R 121 E C H 124 R PR T A 123 127 C L E K E M A O N K E C R PR N E N E E E 128 D I E E T 126 M R P C N C 122 E I N E C R R R R E C O E K T E K M PR I R O N S M 125 S E E K D O S E E L K L R E M N O C O R

K B K 129 Q E N C K E R R U E O R E T R E E PR E I O C O R L N E C V C C M A R E 133 B T E R I W B C G R 134 R M A L H E E K S S R 132 E C R U I 135 Q 136 S E R R U R H O M L R S H V H O M O K M A R E C T E N E E E E K R R R T C R C 131 C R KINN R A C E EAR TRET O I OQUIHA HEWAY I PR LLA E S C H LA D KE LAK 138 LAKES K E O R T N W H E R A O L E K A N L K I K 139 M E FALLS 140 R 145 LAKE C 137 M INKAWTHIA 143 R M LAKE E B O I PR E S E M C 142 K R E E K

N 147 F N " I S H M

H K 146 " A 144 C R E E 0 151 L

T PR 0 ' I L C S A W M PR ' H K 6 E M 6 W U M C R R E K E 3 Y C R E E K S 149 3 E ° E 150 ° K

9 R K 157 R 9 4 C E 148 152 4 E K R 161 E C M N B PR PR E WARNE O 153 A R B 155 R D S L LAK K R E 164 R C D D I 167 O E PR I T E S W O I R T K PR V 168 W E R A COQUIHALLA O G A I B U L L C R E A 162 C 172 N B 160 N D 171 S 165 T SUMMIT E A H C E K PR L C H R L E R D E K E R N PR C C G M R H E S M E 166 E RECREATION AREA N C T O R R E THO R R MA S U S E A C E 175 E C L K T E E O L PR K LA E A R 154 KE N K E 176 K K Y S E 159 R 177 K R U E K I 156 O PR G B E H PR K I K PR G 178 R B O K D E M C 174 R 181 D 190 E MURP E 158 HY R 185 183 173 M JE N LAKE C 180 ANNE PR S E K 184 R R E E C D C E A G L M C R E R LAKE ISAPP R E C OINTME S W S N K NT INSLOW E HA Y T W RRISON O PR 196 R LAKE R E L E E N E D AKE T Y LAKE 179 200 M R E N I T E K L R PR R E O 186 182 K T PR E E G 187 U C C L R 189 V PR K I PR I I E R G E E E L V TING K I V PR LE JUDICATOR 195 192 R L R R PR R E A LAK C E E LAKE 197 K K A L C N 762 M C PR R R A L E E PR R A L E K 205 U L E PR 204 E 191 Q K E A E K M E T 198 R H A C A I Y 193 U L PR R L 188 203 E C WOTT Q S T EN PR U Y E K O D M 210 C LAKE 206 C R E R PR STATL A E E E C E E K T E U 211 R K R L M R E U K L M A N C C G E E C B LAK PR S A 220 E E EMORY E 215 PR K D N

C 209 N N J " K PR 208 201 CREEK PARK " CON I 0 SOLAT C R E 207 IO E 0 ' N E K PR LAK PR R M ' 0 ES PR ISABEL E K PR 0 3 0 E 752 223 C K 3

° R LAKE E ° LO R 9 221 OKOUT C R L 9 E

C 4 218 L 239 LAKE COMET Y R 4 PR E C E E K Y O 214 R R Y DISC 202 LAKE PR K C A R Q OBE PR O LISK M C U LAKE 219 PR R E LAKE SUNRISE PR E 224 E K I 236 212 226 SPIND 199 227 T LE PR LAKE 235 PR SQUEAH 225 L 754 LAKE C PR PR R 226 A N R K 250 234 PR LAKE 241 PR M M E C R 240 O E PR 232 E 233 T E PR E R PR R PR A R F E 216 K L A R E E E C E E COQUIHALLA D C E K E K H A L E E R E PR E T M I G R C K C C R PR K S V D Y C 213 E BARNET 242 N T D C E E P I 222 229 RIVER PARK R I B R P L K R H E 246 E C K A I R 231 H Y 753 247 LAKE W N E W R E P P 245 A R E M 243 M A S P E M O S L L K 252 K PR E E A E 228 G U L A PR K PR W E PR V K UNZELMAN K PR T U 249 R A I L E PR I WOOD S KLAHATER 244 R S PR 251 O LAKE R R C D LAK LAK 248 M A D C E E P R R E D E T R PR W 266 S A L I A N C E U PR C F Y 262 W E E R I 253 I K C D R N T K E E N E PR L PENEPLAIN A G R 259 PR A 254 E K W U R E A T K IDGEON D E R L O PR 271 268 258 Y LAKE C R K M E 269 G K 256 E E CCREA A H PR WIL E C C LAKE C R OL SON E K PR IVE PR CHEH R LAK H PR I R E ALIS E E ANSON R N LAKE R PR E LA C R E E E E G KE H LAKE C E K 260 267 E 264 R LAKE K C E E HECT R L C S C OR G E 265 E D 261 K L F L E M M PR PR L ER D K GUSON A K M E I I 274 PR M N C M I 257 279 263 PR K LAKE I S 280 E E C S E PR S R D A W R 275 272 U R C E PR M PR T T E R K E C R E E K N C R 286 278 E E PR 255 PR E BLINCH I L C 0 C K E R I C A N C R E E K 277 M R M N R LAKE E E 287 A E 285 K 282 T E R 288 PINECONE E R E E PR R PITT 291 E K C K K 290 E Y PR BURKE PARK 289 270 R B E E LAKE U R K 299 PR 273 C R C K PR PR 295 293 L E E 298 K SCHKAM I A N PR E PR M M K E H G I E 292 N U LAK E R GA G R E E BN BRO E E K PR R SLOLL E IC N C C R UM 281 C " 304 C C A C N OQU T 306 R S " ITLAM ALUS RAVE K 307 T I R LAKE N ENYON M E L L I LAKE 0 L C 276 T N 0 Y ' R E 300 E K PR I E L C ' LAKE LAKE LAKE K C R E E K PR A O 297 C R E K LAKE C PR K N 4 L O C A Y 4 P B S R O 310 I L W E E 2 I K R A H E L L R 2

° 312 A

K R A S ° R E O 302 H C K 313 M 314 K M H O

9 E C D 301 I A E A O 9 E R E PR K 316 M L T L 4 E 294 296 U L PR PR M 4 B V C E 320 C R 315 PR V O C I R 308 B R E T T PR N C C R C R 305 R E R K 318 R PR V R C R PR E R A 335 E R E 322 E C PR PR E E E COQUIHALLA 317 R 311 E K K Y 331 325 K E 323 C K I S PR U AWKAW H H K E K DEVIL S A CANYON PARK O O R 324 PR C L E T PR K PR 330 334 R LAKE P LAK E M E M E Hop E T e R PR S 332 K I 319 326 R 338 303 ! C C K 333 R C P E 321 337 341 PR 345 PR E E K R E R 329 E 342 343 M E BENN L S B U PR O R IE ST S A K E AVE R Y E PR N T E O 339 E R PR I G LA C R E R 353 PR 344 N Y C R K KE LAKE E K R E C 349 DE 327 C E PR C 328 ER K FLOR SALSBU 361 PR 350 NICOLUM ENCE RY U N SASQUATCH LAKE R A PR L LA L 346 356 357 348 AKE KE H PR R 347 RIVER PARK T S G PARK 340 355 378 T 365 A U PR PR R N A 366 R DENNE 351 A 376 354 I PR TT R T T V S WE 369 C 372 AV E TWI ER H JA K PIN 352 N L A 367 359 U T L 364 O COBSON E LAKE E S 360 O A 371 PR E K U L R U LAKE 368 D C MUN F LAKES R K U LAKE RO SHIRL LAKE PR W R E MOSS K ERYO KA K C I PR T N N S T PR N H H E ERINE O C M K M S R 358 C R E E U LAKE V A N S 382 ORGAN E 377 E K 385 C 373 M L E P D LA C T E K FRAN TRO LAKE T I O K C R 374 A LEAKE LAKE E R A E R IS UT E I M E T E G O E LAK R R H T K E E U M U E PR L R PR E E LAKE LAK X A C 390 E 362 PR I S G 729 375 381 E R V O R E E V T 391 K C E D H 397 C K 370 PR K S L E R S PR K R r R A E 393 C E LOUETT R O E BU I G E C KIPP RR A AN R K PR L R B E PR E E O LAKE E 398 380 e C T EUNICE V E PR O LA LAKE R I R E R KES BETSY K L K GR HICKS 384 379 T A I N ACE C 363 394 v F 383 E LAKE C N D T I PR M C GWENDO LA G 386 LA K A C LINE KE L N LAK KE i E K E I C 403 V PR Y PR 395 N C 404 R A C R E PR PR Y 409 PR BAT H T LAKE E E D O 408 E IE K E I M R 387 A E R C Y SU L R C WOLF E K T RPRISE R K E PR LAK R R PR S C T R E I F O R CASCADE E T E R E N LAKE K LAKE Y 750 R R 410 E B P PLACI 411 C E n IRMY D E K L E V E N M C A PE C R E E C E 415 426 BEAR 424 Z 401 I L ACEFUL W E A D 406 SILV E RECREATION R 414 T H E R H E A E N ER e LAK LAKE M K R PR 396 C E E 423 LA 425 E A R K PR E LAKE SAYRES 418 PR 416 KE 407 PR LAKE 413 E e K BIRD E R K PR E L R PR K AREA OST 437 D 416 O F.H. PR K m LAKE SONNY ICKSO E L E LAKE 428 N PR MORRIS PR PR E SILVER PR A Q U LAKE LOON D O W A a BEAUTIFU 435 R PR LAKE L K BARBER R 399 E S O L K 420 C AKE LAKE R l N LAK R 432 U E R N JACOB E U 441 LAKE PARK C " 730 S LAKE R u A PR E PR " PARK C 429 R

0 R T PR M E S 417 G

LA 0 ' PR KE S PR 422 E ' R E E 442 R L C MC 8 KA Y Y H 448 R 8 445 E E V E K 451 PR

1 A PR E LAK A K 1 Y E O E 734 V K E ° R 456 464 D ° I R A PR BLANE N C VIS 419 R 430 C I Y D

9 R Har S rison 9 R 446 H R PR T E ot D L S S C AK 436 p W 4 RA LAK E W ri NB E E A K ng E PR T RR R Y s G 4 LAF Y K E E 453 M PR RANT ARGE V 443 ! 459 462 I S S N V E 470 T PR P LAK E E E E N PR L LAKE I 463 I 460 N R 454 R K A AKE E K GOOSE 2 N I O PR PR PR 421 N T PR R R C 450 A N E A S I 447 455 C R E PR S 468 E LA S C KE T R PR H Y 474 475 PR S L T PR H Y D E 733 C 485 C P R E T 458 438 N PR C S E R AMPBE R R I E E K LL O C E 465 461 PU 484 DAVIS C N U E K CH R 737 S L O S 469 L PR PR S R E AKE L R 479 U C BO O I S WL 739 748 U PR LAKE PR PR G GHOSTP E 492 ASS L C PR E R R PR 738 MIKE 482 G C E A 503 483 476 K E 481 K A 477 472 LAKE K R E M S E E 736 L H PARK E F C R E E K E M AKE R 487 C K IRR E K EL E E 742 E OR K K BOW PR 466 L E E H A E 490 PR 478 M 494 PR I K 743 R E E R M E R PR LAK E E LA K C T E M D R KE C E C 749 K E C R THURSTON PR PR N PR G R E STACEY 488 E R DEVILS C 500 N C E N O LAKE L 493 I B K E L R 496 LAKE E M E I N LAKE E O M 509 439 M E T L Po S L P H CAN 499 M 480 I M rt Co O OOVER NELL W I PR q S S 473 uitla Y 735 I N M m PR A 489 E R 757 Y C R E ! R U LAKE 758 ECHO C E 497 M R A 514 501 N L E LAKE O R PR E K E E I R E T L PR PR K B G LAK 498 PR M V E U R R E C C N A 740 C R PR N DRY B A 745 E R E K E T H L E E R E N R O B Y H E LA C K S PR R S KE R C PR C R 756 E 522 449 B U PR ROLLEY E A A 516 R C EAT U 513 ON G T Y E 518 N W E K A 527 T E E O T E G E I K R K PR T LA K 759 K T T L S 533 W A E E LAKE PARK E S Ke PR PR E E L A 539 nt 519 PR E 517 PR E I S O R O 524 E O L I L G U G V R AL R N 523 ! 525 S L O H LAN R G O R E S K A T Z I E ROLLE 511 PR C R E E K N O PR K Y PR U E LA C H C R KE 528 PR 537 E PR G E C R 746 LAKE S 546 E PR K H 755 KILBY A N O L S W H A L H E C PR 547 W A PR R 534 540 PR S H 760 E E K H L E T E N R C R PARK O A C H I E C K U M E Pitt Me W C R WAH SWAN K adows K R U PR E E K LEACH EE PR R R R R A T 544 ! E E G 551 LA E T A 512 E KE LAKE T E E E I S R C U 554 H E L H D T O K S I D D K 747 S T E E N E A 549 O A PR R T C R E O L Q 541 548 R 545 R L 543 P Map C A E E R l C S RR PR e Rid N OCK, 552 C ge R 553 C PR PR P R 559 S R H 538 ! E E LAKE PR 532 555PR K E PR D E E C 566 K W C PR 558 570 O HONNOCK PR E L N PR E K 576 561 C C O 568 O T R R L PP R 577 E AKE PR 564 E D R C R E N R N K A E K Y PR 486 563 D K E 557 E 579 A N A E PR H 556 R N E

N G A D O PR C O 569 PR N

" U K F K C O " H 0 587 R L 0 ' 582 G 589 H ' S HAYWARD S U 560 W 2 E O 574 Y P 594 L C A S L 571 L 2 O LAK PR M P ING K 1 E L 590

E 1 R 567 E E

° PR N E K C LAKE ° S E R H K B PR 573 S 9 O R A I E 598 9 S C I R PR 575 L 583 K F 4 V N 584

S H K R 4 E R I E 586 E E N E 591 PR 593 M R G O C R PR C E R E E U PR P K PR CHEAM S C D N O 572 L M E 600 B R I E A K 602 Y L D I A I E N C E S L E E R R AKE 592 G R R O E A 599 R L I E T S 604 P R Y R C E IL E C S W M VERME O V RE E S H 609 L C M A R I K E R PR Y O E E M N LAKE PR C V M N 607 C C A K M A R I O E R R R 610 BRIDAL R R T L K H T E E E O E HATZIC PR K 597 L C R R E N E E O L E H V O E E E 603 E P D PR R U N V VEIL FALLS E 614 A E T I LAKE C C D I P M K I I PR E K V A R L N K Y U 618 H U A K S E A I Q C L PR E 611 L L H PARK R M P I R E K L E C M L C S E PR E I R C W E L PR A R A K E T R C O C S R H K B R O E W C T C U G C R K K 613 R R O K R E E E E E K M L E C R T E S E E E N M U E A I V I I D K PR P T T E 623 H 608 K L L A E 620 I I P Y R Mis R 619 S E S sion K D I PR P 624 PR X C ! D M A H O H F O R C O C E S K L M R T E C 626 622 R I D E E A PR L E N R 631 627 E E E C R S R N W I L L 621 630 E I C W E C K A E E C 625 628 638 A R WI R Su I R LLIAM K E r R SON rey T L Chilliw M E 634 PR E a M K ck M E GREEND PR K E H H S PR M E 636 K I P U L ROP G ! L H N E AKE E O I C S E A K K M LAKE 629 U N H K E K N 633 A C C O R O R G H S U E R C U 641 616 635 L O L L E N 637 632 C PR L T E W S O T K S K E E E R H H A C R C S PR K C U R E E K K 640 PR L W S D 643 S I E A E P R O K L E A R T E AGE R S E G 615 R C C N L E Y C L PR P I R E R I L E FOL V E E N A LAKE PR M EY R R O 652 H C G H E C 648 R L E K A PR E L O D AK E A E E H K N V K 656 655 K Y

N C N M I K I 639 A 661 E D R 659 CHA L 645 650 R A DSE C 662 Y E L L K L 646 644 FLO PR R E E RA E R M LAK PR LINDE R W E I E PR MAN C K E K W C M E A W LAKE U E E E D PR PR LAK T T I E K A K E K E 651 A N W M S 663 S 654 A A R E 653 I H O C C C R S G S Lan M E g C L K 647 PR N ley ang E L 657

le E N I y (Dis P A G O U G H PR " tric 660 t R ! ) E / RYDER C " N ! 658 LERF 649 0 668 V PR

R 0 K C ' PR LAKE ' E 666 LAKE 6 PR PR PR E.C. 6 ° D Y O U PR °

9 D N 674 665 667 9 MANNING 4 E G 4 669 A P O POLAND R PR PR M PARK L C L A LAKE R PR N T R 672 O Y I D 670 P R V 679 E E C 675 C R L R E PR U E A E Y B U 676 V E H 680 677 PR E K C K R I R PR P G C R E N R K PR E U 683 I C S K E R R PR O 682 E PR E E C E S L E E K U S R 684 R K S N A T C T CHILLIWACK C B E S A M M R A N A E M U W 673 CHILLIWACK L N A RIVER PARK K E C E M M E S R E U L S E B E T R E PR R R R R O C LAKE PARK A A N S 690 C

T S N Y E 685 K C E E K R R M M C R R 703 L A L L S E E E D A I E I T H F K W V PR C N V I A PR E D N I L E PR 693 A SKAGIT

C 697 K A R R N L 696 PIERCE 689 R R E 699 691 695 I S S E PR LAKE PR . VALLEY PARK C U PR 698 700 E A T b W 701 R O botsford PR PR M M PR H B P S E N C CHILL E I IWA A ! PR PR 688 CK L T R 704 N C 694

K E C A Z C 710 C LAKE F 706 K E R O L D H N A N T E PR 709 E E MILL PR CUL 708 PR 711 E C R TUS A E O F M E E L E N E K LA A R KE L A N S R K E AKE 714 707 S T F C L C L C C L 702 E W R E A R R R S L C S 712 R T E 715 PR K E E K PR 705 S E G 678 R 719 717 H E E M C E W E PR U E C E K E G PR O PR R R A

K M S K R K T E C E C U W V R E E T H A 721 E I K W C E T CULTUS 713 R 716 A hit R L L E E K E e C R M C I R O E ock R A L W R A R N O S D E N E I M H C ! E L K H A I K E S C L S W PR K D C E D M S LAKE PARK H PR K E E A E S K 723 724 M H A B E S O C I C P E K L 722 O P R R O E R T R C R M C U M M T A A G T E R E R C N H F 720 C I E E E C P M C E R E K K E V E R LIUMCH K EN PR E C A P N C E E E L 727 R C R E AKE L ROSS LAXTO A E N K K K 726 E E M 725 G LAKE N K L E AKE N E " JUDSON E PR N A " 0 T K

R I 0 ' R O N A ' LAKE E L C R E E K 0

C 0 T ° HA NGING °

9 N R LAK 9 E I 4 4 A

122°36'0"W 122°24'0"W 122°12'0"W 122°0'0"W 121°48'0"W 121°36'0"W 121°24'0"W 121°12'0"W 121°0'0"W

Appendix F:

Visual Quality Objectives in the Mission Tree Farm Licence (MTFL) FDU

Page 101 of 104

Blank page

Page 102 of 104

VISUAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES IN TFL 26

Visual VSU #s To Visual Quality Comments Sensitivity Reference to Objective ** Unit #s on FSP Original 1999 Map VLI * 606 1000 PR 596 1001 PR 580 1002 PR 578 1003 PR 562 1004 PR 526 1005 PR n/a 1006 n/a This unit was deleted in the VLI. 535 1007 PR 521 1008 PR 515 1009 PR 507 1010 PR 508 1011 PR 491 1012 PR 457 1013 PR 434 1014 PR 433 1015 PR 452 1016 PR 502 1017 PR 402 1018 PR 400 1019 PR 412 1020 PR 431 1021 PR 440 1022 PR 510 1023 PR 504 1024 PR 506 1025 PR 467 1026 PR 389 1027 PR 405 1028 PR 505 1029 PR

Page 103 of 104

531 1030 M 530 1031 M 529 1032 PR 581 1033 PR 550 1034 M 585 1035 PR 601 1036 PR 605 1037 M 612 1038 M 588 1039 M 495 1040 M 427 1041 M

Note: the source of the Visual Sensitivity Unit boundaries is from the 1999 Visual Landscape Inventory for Mission TFL 26 completed by Geoscape Environmental Planners.

* These are the Visual landscape Unit #s shown in the 1999 Visual Landscape Inventory. While they have no relevance to the FSP, they can be used to reference to corresponding units identified in the original VLI.

** M = Modification PR = Partial Retention

Page 104 of 104