DOCSLIB.ORG

NDOW 2009-2010 Big Game Status Report Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NDOW 2009-2010 Big Game Status Report Nevada NNNEEEVVVAAADDDAAA DDDEEEPPPAAARRRTTTMMMEEENNNTTT OOOFFF WWWIIILLLDDDLLLIIIFFFEEE 222000000999 ––– 222000111000 BBBIIIGGG GGGAAAMMEEE SSSTTTAAATTTUUUSSS STATE OF NEVADA Jim Gibbons, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Ken Mayer, Director GAME DIVISION Larry Gilbertson, Chief Mike Cox, Big Game Staff Biologist Tony Wasley, Mule Deer Staff Biologist Kevin Lansford, Furbearer Staff Biologist Dawn Carter, Administrative Assistant Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Dobel Steve Kimble Larry Gilbertson Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Pat Cummings Curt Baughman Carl Lackey Tom Donham Ken Gray Kyle Neill Mike Scott Kari Huebner Ed Partee Jeremy Lutz Jason Salisbury Caleb McAdoo Mike Podborny Russell Woolstenhulme Cover Photos by: Bill Homan, Larry Spradlin, and Tony Wasley This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and sex [in educational programs]. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: US Fish and Wildlife Service or Director Division of Federal Assistance Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: MBSP-4020 1100 Valley Road Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 89512 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1550, or teletype to the following State Relay number 1-800-326-6868 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2009-2010 BIG GAME STATUS NEVADA -~ WILDLIFE This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Grant W-48-R-41; Sub-Grant II, Big Game Management Compiled and Edited by: Mike Cox, Big Game Staff Biologist Tony Wasley, Mule Deer Staff Biologist Mike Dobel, Regional Supervising Biologist Larry Gilbertson, Game Division Chief Steve Kimble, Regional Supervising Biologist Kevin Lansford, Furbearer Staff Biologist Dawn Carter, Administrative Assistant _...- TABLE OF CONTENTS BIG GAME STATUS STATEWIDE SUMMARY ............................. SS1 – SS7 MULE DEER .......................................................................... 1 Units 011 – 015: Northern Washoe and Western Humboldt Counties ........................................ 1 Units 021, 022: Southern Washoe County ........................................................................ 2 Units 031, 032, 034, 035: Western Humboldt County .......................................................... 3 Unit 033: Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge; Washoe and Humboldt Counties ............................ 4 Units 041, 042: Western Pershing and Southern Humboldt Counties ........................................ 5 Units 043 - 046: Eastern Pershing and Southern Humboldt Counties ........................................ 6 Unit 051: Santa Rosa Mountains; Eastern Humboldt County .................................................. 7 Units 061 - 062, 064, 066 – 068: Independence and Tuscarora Ranges; Elko County ..................... 7 Unit 065: Pinyon Range; Southwestern Elko County ........................................................... 8 Units 071 – 079, 091: Northeastern Elko County ................................................................ 9 Unit 081: Goose Creek Area; Northeastern Elko County ...................................................... 10 Units 101 - 108: Southern Elko and Northwestern White Pine Counties .................................... 10 Units 111 – 113: Eastern White Pine County ..................................................................... 11 Units 114 – 115: Snake Range; Southeastern White Pine County ............................................. 12 Unit 121: North Egan, Cherry Creek Ranges; White Pine and Elko Counties ............................... 13 Units 131 - 134: Southern White Pine, Eastern Nye and Western Lincoln Counties ....................... 13 Units 141 - 145: Eureka and Eastern White Pine Counties .................................................... 14 Units 151, 152, 154, 155: Lander and Western Eureka Counties ............................................. 15 Units 161 - 164: North-Central Nye and Southern Lander and Eureka Counties ........................... 16 Units 171 - 173: Northwestern Nye and Southern Lander Counties .......................................... 17 Units 181 - 184: Churchill, Southern Pershing and Western Lander Counties ............................. 18 Unit 192: Carson River Interstate Herd; Douglas County ...................................................... 18 Unit 194, 196: Carson Range and Peavine Mountain Interstate Herd; Washoe and Carson City Counties ..................................................................................................... 19 Unit 195: Virginia Range Herd; Storey, Washoe and Lyon Counties ......................................... 20 Units 201, 202, 204 – 206: Walker/Mono Interstate Deer Herd; Douglas, Lyon and Mineral Counties . 20 Unit 203: Mason and Smith Valley Resident Herds; Lyon County ............................................ 21 Units 211, 212: Esmeralda County ................................................................................ 21 Units 221 - 223: Northern Lincoln and Southern White Pine Counties ...................................... 22 Unit 231: Wilson Creek Range; Northeastern Lincoln County ................................................ 22 Units 241 – 245: Clover, Delamar, and Meadow Valley Mountain Ranges; Lincoln County ............... 23 Units 251 - 253: South Central Nye County ...................................................................... 23 Units 261 – 268: Clark and Southern Nye Counties ............................................................. 24 Units 271, 272: Southern Lincoln and Northeastern Clark Counties ......................................... 24 Unit 291: Pinenut Mountain Herd: Douglas County ............................................................. 25 PRONGHORN ANTELOPE ........................................................ 26 Units 011 - 015, 021, 022: Washoe and Western Humboldt Counties ....................................... 26 Units 031, 032, 034, 035, 051: Humboldt County .............................................................. 28 Unit 033: Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge; Washoe and Humboldt Counties ............................ 29 Units 041, 042: Western Pershing and Southern Humboldt Counties ........................................ 30 Units 061, 062, 064, 071, 073: North Central Elko County .................................................... 31 i Units 065, 142, portion of 144: Southern Elko County, Northern Eureka County ......................... 31 Unit 066, Owyhee Desert: Northwestern Elko County ......................................................... 32 Units 067, 068: Western Elko and Northern Lander and Eureka Counties .................................. 32 Units 072, 074, 075: Northeastern Elko County ................................................................. 33 Units 076, 077, 079, 081, 091: Northeastern Elko County .................................................... 33 Units 078, 105 – 107, 121: Southeastern Elko and Central White Pine Counties .......................... 34 Units 101 – 104, 108, portion of 144: South Central Elko and Western White Pine Counties ............ 34 Units 111 – 114: Eastern White Pine County ..................................................................... 35 Units 115, 231, 242: Eastern Lincoln and Southern White Pine Counties ................................... 36 Units 131, 145, 163, 164: Southern Eureka, Northeastern Nye, and Southwestern White Pine Counties ..................................................................................................... 37 Units 132-134, 245: Eastern Nye and Western Lincoln Counties ............................................. 37 Units 141, 143, 151 – 155: Eastern Lander and Eureka Counties ............................................. 38 Units 161, 162: Northern Nye, Southeastern Lander, and Southwestern Eureka Counties .............. 38 Units 171 – 173: Northwestern Nye and Southern Lander Counties .......................................... 39 Units 181-184: Churchill, Southern Pershing, Western Lander and Northern Mineral Counties ........ 40 Units 202, 204: Lyon and Mineral Counties ..................................................................... 41 Units 203, 291: Lyon, Douglas Counties ......................................................................... 41 Units 205, 206: Eastern Mineral County ......................................................................... 42 Units 221 – 223, 241: Lincoln and Southern White Pine Counties ............................................ 42 Unit 251, Central Nye County ..................................................................................... 43 ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK .......................................................... 44 Units 061, 071: Bruneau River and Merritt Mountain Area; Northern Elko County ........................ 44 Units 062, 064, 066 – 068: Independence and Tuscarora Ranges; Western Elko and Northern Eureka and Lander Counties ...................................................................................... 45 Units 072, 074: Jarbidge Mountains; Northern Elko County .................................................. 45 Unit 073: Stag Mountain Area; Elko County
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANTC Environmental Assessment
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2013-0024-EA Telecommunication Facilities at Kingston, Dyer, and Hickison Summit July 2013 Applicant: Arizona Nevada Tower Corporation 6220 McLeod Drive Ste. 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89120 Battle Mountain District Bureau of Land Management 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, Nevada 89820 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Identifying Information 2 1.4 Location of Proposed Action 2 1.5 Preparing Office 2 1.6 Case File Numbers 2 1.7 Applicant 2 1.8 Proposed Action Summary 3 1.9 Conformance 3 1.10 Purpose & Need 3 1.11 Scoping, Public Involvement & Issues 4 Chapter 2 Proposed Action & Alternatives 11 2.1 Proposed Action 11 2.1.1 Best Management Practices 13 2.2 No Action Alternative 13 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis 14 Chapter 3 Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 15 3.1 Project Site Descriptions 15 3.2 Issues 16 3.2.1 Air Quality 18 3.2.1.1 Affected Environment 18 3.2.1.2 Environmental Consequences 18 3.2.2 Cultural/Historical Resources 18 3.2.2.1 Affected Environment 18 3.2.2.2 Environmental Consequences 18 3.2.3 Noxious Weeds/Invasive Non-native Plants 19 3.2.3.1 Affected Environment 19 3.2.3.2 Environmental Consequences 20 3.2.4 Native American Religious Concerns 20 3.2.4.1 Affected Environment 20 3.2.4.2 Environmental Consequences 20 3.2.5 Migratory Birds 21 3.2.5.1 Affected Environment 21 3.2.5.2 Environmental Consequences 22 3.2.6 Solid/Hazardous
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory Report
    Eldorado Mountain/ Doudy Draw Trail Study Area (TSA) Inventory Report February 24, 2006 Table of Contents Eldorado Mountain/ Doudy Draw Trail Study Area (TSA) Inventory Report Page # Introduction 04 Summary of Major Findings 04 Issues and Opportunities 05 Area Description 06 Management Area Designations 06 Recreation Resources 07 Trailheads 08 Designated Accesses 09 Undesignated Accesses 10 Designated Trails 10 Undesignated Trails 11 Destinations and Connections 12 Recreational Issues 13 Property Rights Issues 14 Cultural and Agricultural Resources 14 Cultural Resources 15 Agricultural Resources 15 Natural Resources 16 Geological and Paleontological Resources 17 Vegetation Communities 18 Xeric Tallgrass Plant Communities 18 Foothills Deciduous Shrublands 19 Wetlands and Riparian Communities 19 Mature Ponderosa Pine Forests 20 Mountain Mahogany Shrublands 21 Needle and Thread Grassland Community 22 Rare and Sensitive Plant Species 22 Exotic and Invasive Species 26 Wildlife Guilds 26 Grassland Nesting Birds 27 Forest Nesting Birds 27 Cliff Nesting Raptors 28 Wildlife Species 29 Mountain Lion 29 Bobcat 30 ELDORADO MOUNTAIN/ DOUDY DRAW TRAIL STUDY AREA- INVENTORY REPORT 2 Black Bears 30 Elk 31 Prairie Dogs 31 Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse 32 Wild Turkey 33 Plains Sharp-tailed Grouse 33 Blue Grouse 34 Northern Leopard Frog 34 Butterflies 35 References 37 Appendices Appendix 1. Vegetation Alliances 41 Appendix 2. Exotic and Invasive Species 42 Figures (not in text) Figure 1. Eldorado Mountain/ Doudy Draw Trail Study Area (TSA) Map Figure 2. Designated and Undesignated Trails Map Figure 3. Cultural and Agricultural Resources Map Figure 4. Landscape Context Map Figure 5. Wildlife and Vegetation Natural Resources Map ELDORADO MOUNTAIN/ DOUDY DRAW TRAIL STUDY AREA- INVENTORY REPORT 3 Introduction This inventory report represents a compilation and analysis of the known resources within the Eldorado Mountain/ Doudy Draw Trail Study Area (TSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetics, Ecology, and Conservation Management of the Rare Orchid Spiranthes Diluvialis
    Aqui egza• Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society " ... dedicated to the appreciation and conservation of the Colorado native flora" IVOlumet8Number2 The Genetics, Ecology, and Conservation Management of the Rare Orchid Spiranthes diluvialis Anna'Maria Arft ~ through the winter months. exist in wetland habitats such as sub irrigated University of Colorado at Boulder "ff1VT II Reproduction appears to be meadows, alluvial terraces, and abandoned strictly sexual with bumble bees stream channels where the soil is saturated at (Bombus species) as the primary pollinators least temporarily during the spring and Spiranthes diluvialis is one of twelve species (Sheviak, 1984; Sipes et aI., 1993). Upon summer growing season. Potential threats to federally listed as Threatened or Endangered germination, many species of Spiranthes the species' habitat include stream \n Colorado. During the past three years, are infected by a mycorrhizal fungus and channelization, water diversions, urban '-'"'I've been engaged in research on this species may persist underground for many years development, and agricultural use. since little was known of the genetic, before leaves emerge above ground. These ecological, and demographic processes individuals may not flower in consecutive PhylogenetiC Origin affecting its life history and long-term year~ or under unfavorable conditions, and Although S. diluvialis is currently recognized survival. My research addresses three areas may survive. due to specific symbiotic as a distinct species, in the past some concerning the evolution and long-term controversy has surrounded its status. The survival of S. diluvialis: phylogenetic or relationships with mycorrhizal W fungi (Wells, 1981). distinctness ofS. diluvialis as a species forms . genealogical history, genetic variation within i the basis for its protection under the .
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Basins Information
    A p p e n d i x A - B a s i n 54 Crescent Valley Page 1 of 6 Basin 54 - Crescent Valley Crescent Valley is a semi-closed basin that is bounded on the west by the Shoshone Range, on the east by the Cortez Mountains, on the south by the Toiyabe Range, and on the north by the Dry Hills. The drainage basin is about 45 miles long, 20 miles wide, and includes an area of approximately 750 square miles. Water enters the basin primarily as precipitation and is discharged primarily through evaporation and transpiration. Relatively small quantities of water enter the basin as surface flow and ground water underflow from the adjacent Carico Lake Valley at Rocky Pass, where Cooks Creek enters the southwestern end of Crescent Valley. Ground water generally flows northeasterly along the axis of the basin. The natural flow of ground water from Crescent Valley discharges into the Humboldt River between Rose Ranch and Beowawe. It is estimated that the average annual net discharge rate is approximately 700 to 750 acre-feet annually. Many of the streams which drain snowmelt of rainfall from the mountains surrounding Crescent Valley do not reach the dry lake beds on the Valley floor: instead, they branch into smaller channels that eventually run dry. Runoff from Crescent Valley does not reach Humboldt River with the exception of Coyote Creek, an intermittent stream that flows north from the Malpais to the Humboldt River and several small ephemeral streams that flow north from the Dry Hills. Surface flow in the Carico Lake Valley coalesces into Cooks Creek, which enters Crescent Valley through Rocky Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Eocene–Early Miocene Paleotopography of the Sierra Nevada–Great Basin–Nevadaplano Based on Widespread Ash-Flow Tuffs and P
    Origin and Evolution of the Sierra Nevada and Walker Lane themed issue Eocene–Early Miocene paleotopography of the Sierra Nevada–Great Basin–Nevadaplano based on widespread ash-fl ow tuffs and paleovalleys Christopher D. Henry1, Nicholas H. Hinz1, James E. Faulds1, Joseph P. Colgan2, David A. John2, Elwood R. Brooks3, Elizabeth J. Cassel4, Larry J. Garside1, David A. Davis1, and Steven B. Castor1 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA 3California State University, Hayward, California 94542, USA 4Department of Earth and Environment, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604, USA ABSTRACT the great volume of erupted tuff and its erup- eruption fl owed similar distances as the mid- tion after ~3 Ma of nearly continuous, major Cenozoic tuffs at average gradients of ~2.5–8 The distribution of Cenozoic ash-fl ow tuffs pyroclastic eruptions near its caldera that m/km. Extrapolated 200–300 km (pre-exten- in the Great Basin and the Sierra Nevada of probably fi lled in nearby topography. sion) from the Pacifi c Ocean to the central eastern California (United States) demon- Distribution of the tuff of Campbell Creek Nevada caldera belt, the lower gradient strates that the region, commonly referred and other ash-fl ow tuffs and continuity of would require elevations of only 0.5 km for to as the Nevadaplano, was an erosional paleovalleys demonstrates that (1) the Basin valley fl oors and 1.5 km for interfl uves. The highland that was drained by major west- and Range–Sierra Nevada structural and great eastward, upvalley fl ow is consistent and east-trending rivers, with a north-south topographic boundary did not exist before with recent stable isotope data that indicate paleodivide through eastern Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow-Crustal Metamorphism During Late Cretaceous Anatexis in the Sevier Hinterland Plateau: Peak Temperature Conditions from the Grant Range, Eastern Nevada, U.S.A
    Shallow-crustal metamorphism during Late Cretaceous anatexis in the Sevier hinterland plateau: Peak temperature conditions from the Grant Range, eastern Nevada, U.S.A. Sean P. Long1*, Emmanuel Soignard2 1SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT, WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN, WASHINGTON 99164, USA 2LEROY EYRING CENTER FOR SOLID STATE SCIENCE, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, TEMPE, ARIZONA 85287, USA ABSTRACT Documenting spatio-temporal relationships between the thermal and deformation histories of orogenic systems can elucidate their evolu- tion. In the Sevier hinterland plateau in eastern Nevada, an episode of Late Cretaceous magmatism and metamorphism affected mid- and upper-crustal levels, concurrent with late-stage shortening in the Sevier thrust belt. Here, we present quantitative peak temperature data from the Grant Range, a site of localized, Late Cretaceous granitic magmatism and greenschist facies metamorphism. Twenty-two samples of Cambrian to Pennsylvanian metasedimentary and sedimentary rocks were analyzed, utilizing Raman spectroscopy on carbonaceous material, vitrinite reflectance, and Rock-Eval pyrolysis thermometry. A published reconstruction of Cenozoic extension indicates that the samples span pre-extensional depths of 2.5–9 km. Peak temperatures systematically increase with depth, from ~100 to 300 °C between 2.5 and 4.5 km, ~400 to 500 °C between 5 and 8 km, and ~550 °C at 9 km. The data define a metamorphic field gradient of ~60 °C/km, and are corroborated by quartz recrystallization microstructure and published conodont alteration indices. Metamorphism in the Grant Range is correlated with contemporary, upper-crustal metamorphism and magmatism documented farther east in Nevada, where metamorphic field gradients as high as ~50 °C/km are estimated.
    [Show full text]
  • FREE PREVIEW ATV Colorado Central Mountains
    CONTENTS Page Topic 6 Trail List 7 Trail Locator Map 8 Trails Listed by Dificulty (Highest Point) 9 Trail Ratings Deined 11 INTRODUCTION 12 How to Use This Book 13 The Right Trail for You 13 Stay on the Trail 14 Colorado OHV Laws and Registration Requirements 15 Altitude Adjustment of Carburetors 16 New Forest Plans 17 Important Facts About Colorado 18 Safety Tips 20 Trip Preparation 20 Checklist of Equipment and Supplies 22 Your Responsibilities as a Backcountry Rider 23 Courtesy and Ethics 24 Carry Extra Maps 25 Global Positioning (GPS Settings) 26 Backcountry Survival 27 OHV Organizations and Campaigns 27 Final Comments 28 Map Legend 29 THE TRAILS See next page for a complete listing of all trails and a locator map. Trail descriptions begin on page 29. 159 APPENDIX 160 Other ATV Books/ Maps 161 Contact Information 166 About the Author 167 Order Form for FunTreks Books 168 Other Books by Charles A. Wells First Twin Trestle on Rollins Pass West, Trail #11. (Hiking only, closed to trafic.) 4 5 Trail List Trail Locator Map No. Trail Page Rating COLORADO-WYOMING BORDER 1. North Sand Hills 30 Easy Cowdrey 1 287 2. Moody Hill 34 Difi cult 125 85 Walden 3. Storm Mountain 38 Difi cult 14 Fort 14 4. Pole Hill* 42 Moderate Collins 44H 14 5. Stillwater Pass Road 46 Easy 14 2 27 6. Idleglen OHV Area* 50 Difi cult Estes 3 Park 34 Greeley 125 34 7. Pierson Park Road 54 Moderate 40 34 Rocky 4 Loveland Mountain 8. Johnny Park Road 58 Difi cult 40 National 36 25 85 5 Park 7 287 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Crater Volcanic Field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA)
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA) 1 2,3 4 5 4 5 1 GEOSPHERE; v. 13, no. 2 Greg A. Valentine , Joaquín A. Cortés , Elisabeth Widom , Eugene I. Smith , Christine Rasoazanamparany , Racheal Johnsen , Jason P. Briner , Andrew G. Harp1, and Brent Turrin6 doi:10.1130/GES01428.1 1Department of Geology, 126 Cooke Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA 2School of Geosciences, The Grant Institute, The Kings Buildings, James Hutton Road, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH 3FE, UK 3School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK 31 figures; 3 tables; 3 supplemental files 4Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Shideler Hall, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 5Department of Geoscience, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA CORRESPONDENCE: gav4@ buffalo .edu 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 610 Taylor Road, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8066, USA CITATION: Valentine, G.A., Cortés, J.A., Widom, ABSTRACT some of the erupted magmas. The LCVF exhibits clustering in the form of E., Smith, E.I., Rasoazanamparany, C., Johnsen, R., Briner, J.P., Harp, A.G., and Turrin, B., 2017, overlapping and colocated monogenetic volcanoes that were separated by Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake The Lunar Crater volcanic field (LCVF) in central Nevada (USA) is domi­ variable amounts of time to as much as several hundred thousand years, but Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA): nated by monogenetic mafic volcanoes spanning the late Miocene to Pleisto­ without sustained crustal reservoirs between the episodes.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor
    STATE OF NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Big Game Staff Biologist Pat Jackson, Carnivore Staff Biologist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer Staff Biologist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Matt Jeffress Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Jeremy Lutz Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts Cover photo credit: Mike Cox This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2017-2018 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]