WDS Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WDS Annual Report Table of Contents Message From the Director: Peregrine falcons reach record 12 pairs . 19 Sharpening Conservation’s Focus . 1 Peregrine facts . 19 Wildlife Diversity Section . 2 A “tern” for the better at Gibson Lake . 20 Osprey reproduction is up; Funding the Projects of the WDS . 3 32 birds released . 21 Indiana’s Species in Peril . 4 Sandhills and whoopers just passing through . 21 Top News for 2005 . 5 How many whoopers? . 22 Land Stewardship . 6 Barn owls at record number of sites . 23 Indiana’s Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy: . 8 Can you help a barn owl find a home? . 24 Amphibians and Reptiles Breeding Bird Atlas in Indiana . 24 Herp sampling: Nongame bird conservation inititiatives . 24 Determining what’s in Indiana . 9 The skinny on crawfish frogs Mammals and mole salamanders . 9 Changes in administrative rules and state listings . 25 North American Amphibian Monitoring Program . 10 Record number of Indiana bats counted . 25 Frog surveys: A great way to date . .11 Managing Indiana bat winter hibernacula . 26 Snapping turtles: Frankin’s ground squirrel Balancing status and regulations . .11 populations patchy . 27 Tuning-in to eastern box turtles . 11 Allegheny woodrats continue to decline . 27 NAAMP volunteer of the year . 12 Population genetics of Allegheny woodrats . 28 Hellbenders at home in the Blue River . 12 River otters removed Controlling invasive wall lizards . 12 from state-endangered status . 28 Aquatic Species Ecology of bobcats in Lake sturgeon are reproducing south-central Indiana . 30 in East Fork White River . 13 Bobcats in other parts of Indiana . 30 Lake sturgeon spawning facts . 13 Statewide freshwater mussel survey . .14 Information Resources Web resources . 32 Mussel aches: A life down under . 16 Indiana’s reptiles and amphibians . 32 Birds Biologist scientific reports. 32 Bald eagle populations still flying high . 17 Meet the WDS Staff . 33 Indiana’s bald eagle program . 17 Supporting Indiana’s Wildlife . .35 Cover photo: The conservation of eastern box turtles is a major concern in Indiana; biologists are undertaking major studies of this long-lived species. See story on page 11. (Photo: WDS staff/IDNR) Sharpening Department of Natural Resources director Conservation’s Focus Kyle Hupfer Message From the Director Division of Fish and Wildlife director In 2005, wildlife Fewer endangered species diversity conserva- Glen Salmon 2005 was a year of big successes for the tion came into badger, bobcat and river otter, all of which sharp focus were removed from the Indiana endan- Wildlife Diversity nationally and in gered species list! They still are protected Section chief Indiana. Years species in Indiana, and the Wildlife from now, we’ll Diversity Section and its partners will con- Catherine (Katie) look back on 2005 tinue to monitor them, but it is very as a turning point Gremillion-Smith encouraging to see populations of these for conservation of unique animals moving away from the Indianapolis, nongame wildlife brink. 317-232-8160 and state-endan- [email protected] gered species, when both achieved promi- • Financial and logistical support from nence like never before. partners enabled the highly successful river otter restoration program. Otters Staff specialist The catalyst for change is the were completely absent from Indiana Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy (CWS). when the project began in 1994; now Kacie Ehrenberger they have taken up residence in 63 of Indianapolis, In 2003, as a condition to receive federal Indiana’s 92 counties and are doing funds for wildlife conservation, Congress very well. 317-234-3361 required each state to develop a CWS — a [email protected] • In the 1950s, badgers were reported in report card on the status and distribution only 33 Indiana counties, but studies by of wildlife in each state. More than just WDS staff show that they expanded their Herpetologist grades, these strategies include an analy- range into at least 61 counties from 1994 sis of threats to wildlife and habitat; they to 1996, and additional evidence Zack Walker also identify actions to address these suggests they might be found in as Bloomington, threats. many as 82 counties. 812-334-1137 Congress mandated that each strategy • Bobcats were first listed as state- [email protected] facilitate future coordination of conserva- endangered in 1969, and from 1970 to tion efforts and promote partnerships by 1990, there were only seven confirmed developing the CWS with broad public reports statewide. But populations have rebounded markedly in the last 10 to 15 Aquatic biologist input. To remain eligible for federal funds years, with 84 confirmed reports in 32 under the State Wildlife Grants Program, Brant Fisher different counties (not counting 40 states and territories were required to Edinburgh, individuals that have been captured as submit an acceptable CWS to the U.S. part of an ongoing WDS study). 812-526-5816 Fish and Wildlife Service by October 2005. [email protected] You can help us continue this exciting From 2003 to 2005, the DNR collaborated trend by supporting the Nongame and with more than 100 partners, including Endangered Wildlife Program (See how Avian biologist state and federal agencies, agricultural on page 35.) groups, conservation and sportsmen’s John Castrale groups, academic professionals and other More about this year’s many accomplish- Mitchell, Hoosiers, to undertake this monumental ments are in the following pages, so read 812-849-4586 effort to catalogue the state’s species and on! Our future is bright, and the path to [email protected] habitats. conserving Indiana’s valuable wildlife and habitats much more clear. Collectively we Now, we start on a new journey with our have sharpened our focus on effective Mammal biologist partners to step this broad strategy down conservation, and together we are walk- into more specific wildlife action plans. ing down a path toward a brighter future. Scott Johnson Our goal is to develop new constituents, Bloomington, expand partnerships and work together to 812-334-1137 improve the quality of life for all Hoosiers. We’ll address the needs of all fish and [email protected] wildlife species by better conserving our shared habitats. Kyle J. Hupfer DNR director 1 Wildlife Diversity Section WDS is responsible for see them in any typical outdoor endangered species. The chief and setting, including your own back- staff specialist both work in the the conservation and yard! Endangered species are ani- Indianapolis DNR offices in the management of over mal species in danger of disap- state government center. Our her- 750 species of pearing from the state, and whose petologist and mammalogist are prospects for survival or recruit- based in Bloomington, our nongame and endan- ment within the state are in imme- ornithologist is in Mitchell, and our gered wildlife. Nongame diate jeopardy. This includes all aquatics biologist is at Atterbury wildlife refers to any animal species classified as endangered Fish and Wildlife area. species that is not traditionally by the federal government that pursued through hunting, fishing occur in Indiana. or for commercial purposes. In Indiana, more than 90 percent of The WDS is part of the Division of the state’s mammals, birds, fish, Fish and Wildlife in the mussels, reptiles and amphibians Department of Natural Resources. are nongame species. Many There currently are six staff mem- nongame species are common bers in the WDS, all with statewide throughout the state — you can responsibilities for nongame and 2 Funding the Projects of the WDS Funding for Annual contributions the projects to the Indiana of the Wildlife Nongame Fund Diversity Section is generated through the Year Amount Indiana Nongame Contributed Fund. In 1982, the state legislature 1983 $133,000 established the 1984 $265,000 Nongame Fund to be used exclusive- 1985 $275,000 ly for the protec- tion, conservation, 1986 $304,108 management and 1987 $443,427 identification of nongame and 1988 $349,847 endangered species. 1989 $411,112 2004, to December 31, 2005, the Nongame Fund raised $489,610 1990 $433,247 The WDS and Nongame Fund through direct donations and the receive no allocation from state tax check-off. 1991 $394,421 revenues. Since the middle of the last century, the management of State Wildlife Grants: 1992 $413,484 Most WDS game fish and wildlife has been projects are eligible for partial fed- 1993 $384,894 supported by federal aid programs eral funding reimbursement and hunting and fishing license through State Wildlife Grants, a 1994 $396,987 revenues (approximately $7.5 mil- program administered by the U.S. lion per year). Starting in 2001, the 1995 $403,033 Fish and Wildlife Service. However, State Wildlife Grants program has these funds are available only as 1996 $362,909 provided federal aid for nongame reimbursements for expenditures. wildlife ($1 miilion per year). Once projects are approved, they 1997 $388,209 are eligible to receive 50 to 75 per- It also is the responsibility of the 1998 $391,300 cent reimbursement. Donations to WDS to seek partners, contributors the Nongame Fund allow the WDS and grants to fund its projects. 1999 $392,300 to have the initial money needed to Funding is used to provide contin- start the reimbursement cycle. 2000 $449,000 ued support for WDS projects, including land acquisition, habitat 2001 $375,000 restoration, contract research proj- ects and staff. WDS projects are 2002 $392,400 funded by the following: A big thank you! 2003 $390,561 The Wildlife Diversity Section staff thank all Tax check-off and donations: individuals and organizations who have con- 2004 $492,907 Indiana income tax check-off tributed staff, time or financially to support its allows taxpayers to give all or part efforts! We are grateful for your support of 2005 $489,610 of their state refund to nongame nongame conservation.
Recommended publications
  • VIEW from the HELM May 2012 Time Flies When You’Re Busy at the Club
    Private Ear NEWSLETTER OF PRIVATEER YACHT CLUB Lake Chickamauga Chattanooga, TN May 2012 www.privateeryachtclub.org Peter Snyder, Editor [email protected] VIEW FROM THE HELM May 2012 Time flies when you’re busy at the club. Well, goes on. Come join in on the largest sail camp yet. Yes, a month has passed, and believe it or not my boat is this year we have potentially nine weeks of sail camp. launched! Yes, Whatta Ride is no longer on the hard, and my “view” is no longer myopically limited to the June also brings three days of racing each week, kayak- bottom of Whatta Ride’s hull. ing, and socials. The “Chicks On the Pond Sailing” are having a stake your date party! Sorry, dates and steaks Your club is buzzing with activity. We have had a hive party. Also, the club social will be a “Spanish Nights” of activities and more to come. This month saw a very themed affair. Margaritas? Cerveza? Holy Guacamole! successful Scowabunga, MC Scow regatta with 28 par- Don’t miss this one. See you there, bring your sombre- ticipants, some from as far as New Jersey. Also, a well ros. Maybe our Blue Grass players will play mariachi attended, get-to-know the MC Scow Friday night sail music. and burgers party. And, don’t forget the “Dock Party” which was a “jammin” good time avec “pickin and grin- nin’”. If you missed the story about the comforts of a kilt, just ask Rhonda Seeber to ribbon the details for you. It was truly a first place story.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Relict Leopard Frog (Rana Onca) As an Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE RELICT LEOPARD FROG (RANA ONCA) AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE PETITIONERS May 8, 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The relict leopard frog (Rana onca) has the dubious distinction of being one of the first North American amphibians thought to have become extinct. Although known to have inhabited at least 64 separate locations, the last historical collections of the species were in the 1950s and this frog was only recently rediscovered at 8 (of the original 64) locations in the early 1990s. This extremely endangered amphibian is now restricted to only 6 localities (a 91% reduction from the original 64 locations) in two disjunct areas within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada. The relict leopard frog historically occurred in springs, seeps, and wetlands within the Virgin, Muddy, and Colorado River drainages, in Utah, Nevada, and Arizona. The Vegas Valley leopard frog, which once inhabited springs in the Las Vegas, Nevada area (and is probably now extinct), may eventually prove to be synonymous with R. onca. Relict leopard frogs were recently discovered in eight springs in the early 1990s near Lake Mead and along the Virgin River. The species has subsequently disappeared from two of these localities. Only about 500 to 1,000 adult frogs remain in the population and none of the extant locations are secure from anthropomorphic events, thus putting the species at an almost guaranteed risk of extinction. The relict leopard frog has likely been extirpated from Utah, Arizona, and from the Muddy River drainage in Nevada, and persists in only 9% of its known historical range.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks of Linuron Use to Federally Threatened California Red-Legged Frog (Rana Aurora Draytonii)
    Risks of Linuron Use to Federally Threatened California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii) Pesticide Effects Determination Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs Washington, D.C. 20460 June 19, 2008 Primary Authors: Michael Davy, Agronomist Wm. J. Shaughnessy, Ph.D, Environmental Scientist Environmental Risk Branch II Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507C) Secondary Review: Donna Randall, Senior Effects Scientist Nelson Thurman, Senior Fate Scientist Environmental Risk Branch II Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) Branch Chief, Environmental Risk Assessment Branch #: Arthur-Jean B. Williams, Acting Branch Chief Environmental Risk Branch II Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary.................................................................................................8 2. Problem Formulation .............................................................................................14 2.1 Purpose...........................................................................................................................14 2.2 Scope..............................................................................................................................16 2.3 Previous Assessments ....................................................................................................18 2.4 Stressor Source and Distribution ...................................................................................19 2.4.1 Environmental Fate
    [Show full text]
  • Father, Daughter Team Wins Mayor's
    The Wayfarer SKIMMER United State Wayfarer Asssociation – www.uswayfarer.org Winter 2020 Father, daughter team wins Mayor’s Cup Cooks enjoy sailing beloved Black Skimmer By Jim Cook W10873 The 43rd Mayor’s Cup regatta was hosted by Lake Townsend YC on Sept. 26-27, 2020. Lake Townsend is a small reservoir just outside of Greensboro, N.C. The lake has very little Jim Cook and his daughter Nora development along the shoreline, with a golf Cook in W10873 followed by Jim and Linda Heffernan in W1066 course on one side and trees on the other, which (above) fly their spinnakers in makes it a gorgeous place to sail. It also helps keep light winds during the Mayor’s the boat traffic down, so sailing in lighter winds is Cup on Lake Townsend. Jim and Nora (left) at the mark. The duo actually possible. went on to win the Sept. 26-27 Entries for the regatta were restricted by the regatta. This was Jim’s second rules of the public boat ramp, but we still had regatta in Black Skimmer, a Mark IV previously owned by North three good fleets of boats with seven Wayfarers, Carolina’s Richard Johnson and nine Flying Scots and a number of youth in 420s. Michele Parish. Photos by JC Over the summer, I purchased a beautiful Mark Adler IV named Black Skimmer (W10873) from Richard Johnson and Michele Parish. I have received so many compliments on the boat, one of them even before I drove away from the parking lot where we did the hand-off.
    [Show full text]
  • California Red-Legged Frog (Rana Aurora Draytonii) and Delta Smelt (Hypomesus Transpacificus)
    Potential Risks of Atrazine Use to Federally Threatened California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii) and Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) Pesticide Effects Determinations Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs Washington, D.C. 20460 February 19, 2009 Primary Authors: Mark Corbin, Senior Scientist Brian Anderson, Biologist Secondary Review: Paige Doelling, Ph.D., Acting Risk Assessment Process Leader James Hetrick, Ph.D., Senior Environmental Scientist Branch Chief, Environmental Risk Branch 3: Dana Spatz 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary..............................................................................................................7 1.1. Purpose of Assessment ..................................................................................................7 1.2. Assessed Chemicals.......................................................................................................7 1.3. Assessment Procedures..................................................................................................7 1.4. Atrazine Uses Assessed .................................................................................................9 1.5. Summary of Conclusions.............................................................................................10 2. Problem Formulation .........................................................................................................13 2.1 Purpose...........................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Louisiana Recreational Fishing Regulations
    2021 LOUISIANA RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS www.wlf.louisiana.gov 1 Get a GEICO quote for your boat and, in just 15 minutes, you’ll know how much you could be saving. If you like what you hear, you can buy your policy right on the spot. Then let us do the rest while you enjoy your free time with peace of mind. geico.com/boat | 1-800-865-4846 Some discounts, coverages, payment plans, and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. In the state of CA, program provided through Boat Association Insurance Services, license #0H87086. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2020 GEICO CONTENTS 6. LICENSING 9. DEFINITIONS DON’T 11. GENERAL FISHING INFORMATION General Regulations.............................................11 Saltwater/Freshwater Line...................................12 LITTER 13. FRESHWATER FISHING SPORTSMEN ARE REMINDED TO: General Information.............................................13 • Clean out truck beds and refrain from throwing Freshwater State Creel & Size Limits....................16 cigarette butts or other trash out of the car or watercraft. 18. SALTWATER FISHING • Carry a trash bag in your car or boat. General Information.............................................18 • Securely cover trash containers to prevent Saltwater State Creel & Size Limits.......................21 animals from spreading litter. 26. OTHER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES Call the state’s “Litterbug Hotline” to report any Recreational Shrimping........................................26 potential littering violations including dumpsites Recreational Oystering.........................................27 and littering in public. Those convicted of littering Recreational Crabbing..........................................28 Recreational Crawfishing......................................29 face hefty fines and litter abatement work.
    [Show full text]
  • Environments of Intelligence
    Environments of Intelligence “An absorbing volume that integrates an extraordinarily wide area of work, with interesting observations and new twists right to the end.” Ruth Millikan, University of Connecticut, USA What is the role of the environment, and of the information it provides, in cognition? More specifically, may there be a role for certain artefacts to play in this context? These are questions that motivate “4E” theories of cognition (as being embodied, embedded, extended, enactive). In his take on that family of views, Hajo Greif first defends and refines a concept of information as primarily natural, environmen- tally embedded in character, which had been eclipsed by information-processing views of cognition. He continues with an inquiry into the cognitive bearing of some artefacts that are sometimes referred to as “intelligent environments”. With- out necessarily having much to do with Artificial Intelligence, such artefacts may ultimately modify our informational environments. With respect to human cognition, the most notable effect of digital computers is not that they might be able, or become able, to think but that they alter the way we perceive, think and act. Hajo Greif teaches at the Munich Center for Technology in Society (MCTS), Technical University of Munich, Germany, and the Department of Philosophy, University of Klagenfurt, Austria. His research interests cover the philosophy – and some of the history and the social studies – of science and technology, as well as the philosophy of mind. History and Philosophy of Technoscience Series Editor: Alfred Nordmann For a full list of titles in this series, please visit www.routledge.com 1 Error and Uncertainty in Scientific Practice Marcel Boumans, Giora Hon and Arthur C.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Evaluation Report Willamette National Forest Fiscal Year 2011
    AUGUST 2011 United States Department of Agriculture Monitoring and Forest Service Evaluation Report Pacific Northwest Region Willamette National Forest Fiscal Year 2011 Ames Creek, Sweet Home, Oregon i AUGUST 2011 ii AUGUST 2011 Welcome to the 2011 Willamette National Forest annual Monitoring and Evaluation report. This is our 23th year implementing the 1990 Willamette National Forest Plan, and this report is intended to give you an update on the services and products we provide. Our professionals monitor a wide variety of forest resources and have summarized their findings for your review. As I reviewed the Forest Plan Monitoring Report I got an opportunity to see the work our specialists are doing in one place and I can’t help but share my appreciation with what the Willamette’s resource specialists are accomplishing. I am overwhelmed by the effort our professionals are doing to get the work done and complete necessary monitoring under declining budgets. Our specialists have entered into partnerships, written grants, and managed volunteers in addition to working with numerous local and federal agencies. We are in the community and hope you enjoying the forests. I invite you to read this year’s report and contact myself or my staff with any questions, ideas, or concerns you may have. I appreciate your continued interest in the Willamette National Forest. Sincerely, MEG MITCHELL Forest Supervisor Willamette National Forest r6-will-009-11 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Carved Ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum
    Ancient Carved Ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum Ancient Carved Ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum Faya Causey With technical analysis by Jeff Maish, Herant Khanjian, and Michael R. Schilling THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM, LOS ANGELES This catalogue was first published in 2012 at http: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data //museumcatalogues.getty.edu/amber. The present online version Names: Causey, Faya, author. | Maish, Jeffrey, contributor. | was migrated in 2019 to https://www.getty.edu/publications Khanjian, Herant, contributor. | Schilling, Michael (Michael Roy), /ambers; it features zoomable high-resolution photography; free contributor. | J. Paul Getty Museum, issuing body. PDF, EPUB, and MOBI downloads; and JPG downloads of the Title: Ancient carved ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum / Faya catalogue images. Causey ; with technical analysis by Jeff Maish, Herant Khanjian, and Michael Schilling. © 2012, 2019 J. Paul Getty Trust Description: Los Angeles : The J. Paul Getty Museum, [2019] | Includes bibliographical references. | Summary: “This catalogue provides a general introduction to amber in the ancient world followed by detailed catalogue entries for fifty-six Etruscan, Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Greek, and Italic carved ambers from the J. Paul Getty Museum. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a The volume concludes with technical notes about scientific copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4 investigations of these objects and Baltic amber”—Provided by .0/. Figures 3, 9–17, 22–24, 28, 32, 33, 36, 38, 40, 51, and 54 are publisher. reproduced with the permission of the rights holders Identifiers: LCCN 2019016671 (print) | LCCN 2019981057 (ebook) | acknowledged in captions and are expressly excluded from the CC ISBN 9781606066348 (paperback) | ISBN 9781606066355 (epub) BY license covering the rest of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • APPLICATION NOTE Amplitude and Phase Characterization 3333 of Ultrashort Laser Pulses
    APPLICATION NOTE Amplitude and Phase Characterization 3333 of Ultrashort Laser Pulses Technology and Applications Center Newport Corporation “In order to measure an event in time, you need an even shorter event.” Rick Trebino, Inventor of Frequency Resolved Optical Grating. 1. Introduction As a consequence of the time-bandwidth uncertainty principle, ultrashort laser pulses carry significant bandwidth. If the spectral components that fall under the bandwidth of the laser pulse are time coincident (figure 1.1), the pulse is said to be at its transform limit. A transform-limited pulse implies that the pulse duration is minimized. Figure 1.2: The temporal relationship between selected Fourier components of a positively chirped pulse. the complete reconstruction of the electric field. Of these techniques, frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) is arguably the most straightforward and easiest to implement. As mentioned earlier, FROG allows for full phase retrieval of the input field without the ambiguity associated with autocorrelation. This note presents a simple, low dispersion, easy-to-use, general purpose FROG device that can be readily implemented on the Newport Long Scan Autocorrelator platform as described in Application Note 27. FROG is a general technique and can be employed in a variety Figure 1.1: The temporal relationship between selected Fourier components of a of experimental geometries, a few of which are listed in transform-limited pulse. Table 1.i Table 1: Various FROG geometries with associated pros and cons. Material properties, such as dispersion, alter the (phase) FROG Works with Works with Characterize Relative relationship between the spectral components of light, Geometry Oscillator Amplifier Sign of Chirp Complexity effectively separating the blue and red components of the SHG FROG Yes Yes No Low pulse in time (figure 1.2).
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA AUDUBON QUARTERLY VOL. 91, NO. 4 NOVEMBER, 2013 INDIANA AUDUBON SOCIETY, Inc
    INDIANA AUDUBON QUARTERLY VOL. 91, NO. 4 NOVEMBER, 2013 INDIANA AUDUBON SOCIETY, Inc. Founded 1898 Incorporated 1939 OFFICERS President……………………………………………Brad Bumgardner [email protected] Past President……………………………………………..Amy Wilms [email protected] Secretary…………………………………………..............Carl Wilms [email protected] Treasurer………………………………………………….Sally Routh [email protected] Editor Quarterly (Director)……………………………...John Kendall [email protected] Editor Cardinal (Director)………………………………...Scott Arvin [email protected] Webmaster (Director)…………………………………Dick Patterson [email protected] DIRECTORS Term Expires 2013 Term Expires 2014 Term Expires 2015 Bill Cummings Jeff Canada Chuck Mills Ted Meyer Steve Sass Chad Williams Karl Henman John Velasquez Alan Bruner FIELD NOTE/COUNT EDITORS/BIRD RECORDS CHAIR Field Note Editor (Spring)………………………………..........Open Field Note Editor (Summer)…………………………….David Ayer [email protected] Field Note Editor (Fall)…………………………..Brad Bumgardner [email protected] Field Note Editor (Winter)……………………………....Rob Ripma [email protected] May Bird Count and Final Edit Editor…………………..Jay Bolden [email protected] Summer Bird Count Editor……………………………Amy Kearns [email protected] Winter Feeder Count Editor………………………….. John Castrale [email protected] Christmas Count Editors…………………….. Gary & Lisa Bowman [email protected] Indiana Bird Records Committee………………………..Rob Ripma [email protected] TRUSTEES OF THE MARY GRAY/DEVELOPMENT ENDOWMENT FUNDS Rob Ripma Sally Routh Margaret Schwarz MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE Sally Routh (Chairperson) [email protected] PAST PRESIDENTS OF THE SOCIETY (LIVING) Susanna Arvin Karen Henman Sallie Potter John F. Branham Edward Hopkins Thomas Potter Thomas Brinduse Kathleen Hoover Marge Riemenschneider Alan W. Bruner Rebecca Lewis Paul Steffen Gerald Dryer Jane Miller Carl Wilms Ted Heemstra Dr. Russell Mumford Amy Wilms The INDIANA AUDUBON QUARTERLY (Formerly the Indiana Audubon Society Yearbook) Published in February, May, August and November by The Indiana Audubon Society, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Indiana Audubon
    A GUIDE TO THE “Adventure awaits on the Indiana Birding Trail” From the shores of Lake Michigan to the banks of the Ohio River, and everything in between, Indiana’s INDIANA AUDUBON diverse habitats have supported the documentation of over 400 bird species. 33 22 3 4 21 54 41 63 20 34 23 27 52 5 45 INDIANA BIRDING TRAIL GUIDE 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS 10 Bendix Woods County Park ...................... 3 Miller Beach ........................................... 34 St. Joseph County - NW Porter County - NW 25 Northwest Beverly D. Crone Restoration Area ........... 4 Mississinewa Lake .................................. 35 44 St. Joseph County - NW Miami County - NE 24 Boot Lake Nature Preserve ....................... 5 Monroe Lake .......................................... 36 58 Elkhart County - NE Monroe & Brown County - SW 57 Northeast Brookville Lake ........................................ 6 Mounds State Park ................................. 37 26 18 Franklin County - C Madison County - C 62 15 Brown County State Park ......................... 7 Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge ........ 38 35 Brown County - SE Jackson & Jennings Counties - SE Red numbers on map: Cane Ridge WMA-Tern Bar Slough WDA ....... 8 O’Bannon Woods State Park ................... 39 Correspond to page 49 Gibson County - SW Harrison County - SE numbers in book Celery Bog Nature Area ............................ 9 Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge ........ 40 42 Tippecanoe County - C Pike & Gibson Counties - SW C: Central 28 Chain O’ Lakes State Park ...................... 10 Pigeon River Fish & Wildlife Area ...........41 Noble County - NE LaGrange & Steuben Counties - NE NW: Northwest Charlestown State Park ........................... 11 Pine Creek Gamebird Habitat Area ........ 42 SE: Southeast 47 Clark County - SE Benton County - C 9 Clifty Falls State Park .............................12 Pine Hills Nature Preserve ..................... 43 SW: Southwest Jefferson County - SE Montgomery County - C Cool Creek Park & Nature Center ............13 Pisgah Marsh Fish & Wildlife Area ........
    [Show full text]