Gd. Multilocular
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ameloblastoma of the Maxillary Sinus 11 Years After Extirpation of Extensive Dentigerous Cysts and Dystopic Wisdom Tooth
in vivo 24: 567-570 (2010) Ameloblastoma of the Maxillary Sinus 11 Years after Extirpation of Extensive Dentigerous Cysts and Dystopic Wisdom Tooth REINHARD E. FRIEDRICH1 and JOZEF ZUSTIN2 1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and 2Pathology, Eppendorf University Hospital, University of Hamburg, Germany Abstract. We present the case of a 36-year-old patient with bone is depicted on adequate radiographs. The tumor replaces ameloblastoma of the maxillary sinus. The history of the the bone by small, radiographically well-defined areas often patient was extraordinary with respect to the diagnosis of an resulting in a honey comb-like translucency (2). This feature is extensive odontogenic cyst of this sinus with a maxillary supported by the insufficient regeneration of bone that might wisdom tooth located far from the region of origin. Both cyst result in osseous expansion of the affected site (8). Association and tooth had been completely extirpated more than 10 years of ameloblastoma with dentigerous cysts is well-documented, prior to the current tumor diagnosis. Diagnosis of in particular the development of ameloblastoma in a ameloblastoma was based on routinely processed specimen and histologically proven cyst with the retained tooth inside the supported by immunohistochemical markers. Localization and bone, and in keratocystic odontogenic tumor (12-14). The extension of both cyst and neoplasm support the assumption amount of tumor inside a dentigerous cyst might vary that both entities arose from the same area. Long-term follow- considerably. On the other hand the association of dentigerous up is recommended in the treatment of odontogenic cysts. cysts with ameloblastomas was called into question (15). -
The Nutrition and Food Web Archive Medical Terminology Book
The Nutrition and Food Web Archive Medical Terminology Book www.nafwa. -
Odontogenic Keratocyst with Ameloblastomatous Dentistry Section Transformation: a Rare Case Report
Case Report DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2020/43336.13636 Odontogenic Keratocyst with Ameloblastomatous Dentistry Section Transformation: A Rare Case Report METEHAN KESKIN1, NILÜFER ÖZKAN2, NIHAT AKBULUT3, MEHMET CIHAN BEREKET4 ABSTRACT Odontogenic Keratocysts (OKC) are a developmental odontogenic cysts arising from remnants of the dental lamina. They differ from other odontogenic cysts due to their aggressive growth behaviour and high recurrence rates. Malignant or benign transformation may develop from their epithelium. Ameloblastomatous transformation of OKC is an extremely rare case. Such lesions have been described as combined or hybrid odontogenic lesions. In this case report, a 22-year-old patient presented with an unusual lesion in the mandible showing histological features of both OKC and ameloblastoma, and review of the available literature regarding the combined lesions. Keywords: Combined lesion, Hybrid lesion, Marginal resection, Mandible CASE REPORT corrugated parakeratosis, approximately 4-6 cell layers and palisaded A systemically healthy 22-year-old male patient was referred to basal cell layer resembling the OKC [Table/Fig-2a]. Some areas Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, inside the cyst wall showed stellate reticulum-like epithelial cells and Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey with painless swelling in the a basal cell layer of tall columnar cells with palisaded, revers polarised left lower jaw for 2 months. Three weeks before the first visit, the nuclei resembling the ameloblastomatous epithelium [Table/Fig-2b]. patient was prescribed antibiotics by another dental clinic because The lesion was diagnosed as Odontogenic Keratocyst (OKC) with of swelling in the left side of the jaw. On extraoral examination, a ameloblastomatous transformation. -
Maxillary Ameloblastoma: a Review with Clinical, Histological
in vivo 34 : 2249-2258 (2020) doi:10.21873/invivo.12035 Review Maxillary Ameloblastoma: A Review With Clinical, Histological and Prognostic Data of a Rare Tumor ZOI EVANGELOU 1, ATHINA ZARACHI 2, JEAN MARC DUMOLLARD 3, MICHEL PEOC’H 3, IOANNIS KOMNOS 2, IOANNIS KASTANIOUDAKIS 2 and GEORGIA KARPATHIOU 1,3 Departments of 1Pathology and Otorhinolaryngology, and 2Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; 3Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France Abstract. Diagnosis of odontogenic tumors can be neoplasms, diagnosis could be straightforward. In locations challenging due to their rarity and diverse morphology, but outside the oral cavity or when rare histological variants are when arising near the tooth, the diagnosis could be found, suspecting the correct diagnosis can be challenging. suspected. When their location is not typical, like inside the This is especially true for maxillary ameloblastomas, which paranasal sinuses, the diagnosis is less easy. Maxillary are rare, possibly leading to low awareness of this neoplasm ameloblastomas are exceedingly rare with only sparse at this location and often show non-classical morphology, information on their epidemiological, histological and genetic thus, rendering its diagnosis more complicated. characteristics. The aim of this report is to thoroughly review Thus, the aim of this review is to define and thoroughly the available literature in order to present the characteristics describe maxillary ameloblastomas based on the available of this tumor. According to available data, maxillary literature after a short introduction in the entity of ameloblastomas can occur in all ages but later than mandible ameloblastoma. ones, and everywhere within the maxillary region without necessarily having direct contact with the teeth. -
Odontogenic Tumors
4/26/20 CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF ODONTOGENIC TUMORS RUI FERNANDES, DMD, MD,FACS, FRCS(ED) PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE- JACKSONVILLE 1 2 Benign th 4 Edition Odontogenic 2017 Tumors Malignant 3 4 BENIGN ODONTOGENIC TUMORS BENIGN ODONTOGENIC TUMORS • EPITHELIAL • MESENCHYMAL • AMELOBLASTOMA • ODONTOGENIC MYXOMA • CALCIFYING EPITHELIAL ODONTOGENIC TUMOR • ODONTOGENIC FIBROMA • PINDBORG TUMOR • PERIPHERAL ODONTOGENIC FIBROMA • ADENOMATOID ODONTOGENIC TUMOR • CEMENTOBLASTOMA • SQUAMOUS ODONTOGENIC TUMOR • ODONTOGENIC GHOST CELL TUMOR 5 6 1 4/26/20 BENIGN ODONTOGENIC TUMORS MALIGNANT ODONTOGENIC TUMORS • PRIMARY INTRAOSSEOUS CARCINOMA • MIXED TUMORS • CARCINOMA ARISING IN ODONTOGENIC CYSTS • AMELOBLASTIC FIBROMA / FIBRO-ODONTOMA • AMELOBLASTIC FIBROSARCOMA • ODONTOMA • AMELOBLASTIC SARCOMA • CLEAR CELL ODONTOGENIC CARCINOMA • ODONTOAMELOBLASTOMA • SCLEROSING ODONTOGENIC CARCINOMA New to the Classification • PRIMORDIAL ODONTOGENIC TUMOR New to the Classification • ODONTOGENIC CARCINOSARCOMA 7 8 0.5 Cases per 100,000/year Ameloblastomas 30%-35% Myxoma AOT 3%-4% Each Ameloblastic fibroma CEOT Ghost Cell Tumor 1% Each 9 10 Courtesy of Professor Ademola Olaitan AMELOBLASTOMA • 1% OF ALL CYSTS AND TUMORS • 30%-60% OF ALL ODONTOGENIC TUMORS • 3RD TO 4TH DECADES OF LIFE • NO GENDER PREDILECTION • MANDIBLE 80% • MAXILLA 20% 11 12 2 4/26/20 AMELOBLASTOMA CLASSIFICATION AMELOBLASTOMA HISTOLOGICAL CRITERIA • SOLID OR MULTI-CYSTIC Conventional 2017 • UNICYSTIC 1. PALISADING NUCLEI 2 • PERIPHERAL 2. REVERSE POLARITY 3. VACUOLIZATION OF THE CYTOPLASM 4. HYPERCHROMATISM OF BASAL CELL LAYER 1 3 4 AmeloblAstomA: DelineAtion of eArly histopathologic feAtures of neoplasiA Robert Vickers, Robert Gorlin, CAncer 26:699-710, 1970 13 14 AMELOBLASTOMA CLASSIFICATION OF 3677 CASES AMELOBLASTOMA SLOW GROWTH – RADIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE Unicystic Peripheral 6% 2% Solid 92% ~3 yeArs After enucleAtion of “dentigerous cyst” P.A . -
A Case Report of a Hybrid Odontogenic Tumour: Ameloblastoma and Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumour in Calcifying Cystic Odontogenic Tumour
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Oral Oncology EXTRA (2006) 42, 287– 290 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/journal/ooex CASE REPORT A case report of a hybrid odontogenic tumour: Ameloblastoma and adenomatoid odontogenic tumour in calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour Weiping Zhang, Yu Chen *, Ning Geng, Dongmei Bao, Mingzhong Yang Department of Oral Pathology, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, No. 14, 3-section, Renminnan Road, Chengdu 610041, PR China Received 23 May 2006; received in revised form 27 June 2006; accepted 7 July 2006 KEYWORDS Summary A hybrid odontogenic tumour comprising three distinct lesions is extremely rare. Ameloblastoma; We presented a hybrid odontogenic tumour composed of a calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour Adenomatoid odontogenic (CCOT), a solid multicystic ameloblastoma (A-S/M) and an adenomatoid odontogenic tumour tumour; (AOT). This tumour was observed in the anterior area of the mandible of a 64-year-old Chinese Calcifying odontogenic woman. Masses of ghost epithelial cells with the characteristics of CCOT were seen in the lining cyst of the cyst. The odontogenic epithelia with the features of A-S/M and AOT were also observed. c 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Introduction Case report In the oral maxillofacial region, calcifying cystic odonto- On July 19, 2001, a 64-year-old woman was referred to the genic tumour (CCOT), solid multicystic ameloblastoma (A- West China College of Stomatology, Chengdu, China, for a S/M) and adenomatoid odontogenic tumour (AOT) are painless enlarging mass in the anterior of the mandible re- well-recognised whereas hybrid odontogenic tumours have gion with a history of 16 months duration. -
An Aggressive Central Giant Cell Granuloma in a Pediatric Patient
Wang et al. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (2019) 48:32 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0356-5 CASEREPORT Open Access An aggressive central giant cell granuloma in a pediatric patient: case report and review of literature Yiqiao Wang1, Andre Le2* , Dina El Demellawy3, Mary Shago4,5, Michael Odell2 and Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki2 Abstract Background: Central giant cell granulomas are benign tumours of the mandible, presenting in children and young adults. Divided into non- and aggressive subtypes, the aggressive subtype is relatively rare and can occasionally progress rapidly, resulting in significant morbidity. Case presentation: We present a case of an aggressive central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) in a six year-old female. The lesion originated in the right mandibular ramus and progressed rapidly to involve the condyle. Diagnosis was made using a combination of imaging and pathology. A timely en bloc resection of the hemi-mandible was performed with placement of a reconstructive titanium plate and condylar prosthesis. Conclusion: Our case demonstrates the importance of considering CGCG in the differential diagnosis of rapidly progressive mandibular lesions in the pediatric population. Prompt diagnosis and management can greatly improve long-term outcomes. Keywords: Central giant cell granuloma, Mandible, Aggressive, Pediatrics Background 5 cm in size, rapid growth, root resorption, tooth displace- Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) is described by the ment leading to malocclusion, cortical bone thinning or World Health Organization as an intraosseous lesion perforation, and recurrence after curettage [7–9]. consisting of cellular fibrous tissue that contains mul- We report an uncommon case of an aggressive CGCG tiple foci of hemorrhage, aggregations of multinucleated in a 6-year-old female, originating in the right mandibu- giant cells, and some trabeculae of woven bone [1]. -
Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Glandular
Cryotherapy in the treatment of glandular odontogenic cyst: case report and review Crioterapia no tratamento de cisto odontogênico glandular: relato de caso e revisão Milene Borges Campagnaro* Raquel Medeiros Farias* Roger Correa de Barros Berthold** Márcia Rejane Brücker*** Fábio Dal Moro Maito**** Claiton Heitz***** Objective: The Glandular Odontogenic Cyst (GOC) is Introduction a rare benign odontogenic lesion, of considerable ag- gression, and often incorrectly diagnosed. We present a Glandular Odontogenic Cyst (GOC) was first patient with a Glandular Odontogenic Cyst in the pos- described by Gardner in 1988 as a distinct clinical terior mandible, its evolution, treatment, and follow-up. pathologic entity, and it was included in the WHO Case report: A female patient, 45 years old, was referred histological typing of odontogenic tumors under to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology GOC or sialo-odontogenic cyst1-5. Division at Cristo Redentor Hospital, Porto Alegre, Bra- Glandular Odontogenic Cyst is a rare lesion, of zil, for the assessment of a painful edema on the right considerable aggressive behavior, originated at the hemiface. A unilocular area with well-defined borders 1-5 in the retromolar region, posterior to the third molar on areas of dental support . Clinically, the most affec- the right side of the mandible. The histopathological ted site is the anterior part of the mandible and it examination suggested GOC. Final considerations: The mostly occurs in middle-aged patients with a slight Glandular Odontogenic Cyst needs a complete clinical male prevalence2,4-8. Epidemiological features are assessment associated with image analyses, and espe- scarce due to the rarity of the lesion and a review in cially, with histopathology for the correct diagnosis of 2008 pointed 111 cases published in the literature6. -
Glandular Odontogenic Cyst: Case Series and Summary of the Literature
502 > CLINICAL REVIEW http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2519-0105/2019/v74no9a6 Glandular odontogenic cyst: case series and summary of the literature SADJ October 2019, Vol. 74 No. 9 p502 - p507 F Opondo1, S Shaik2, J Opperman3, CJ Nortjé4 ABSTRACT The glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) remains a Histologically, it may mimic any one of a dentigerous rare entity. It was initially named “sialo-odontogenic cyst, radicular cyst, surgical ciliated cyst, lateral perio- cyst” by Padayachee and Van Wyk in 1987 when dontal cyst or a botryoid odontogenic cyst. Importantly, they reported the first two cases. Thereafter the the features of a cystic lesion with squamous and term glandular odontogenic cyst was suggested mucous epithelial elements may cause it to be mis- by Gardner et al. in 1988 and was subsequently diagnosed as a central mucoepidermoid carcinoma. adopted by the WHO.1 With more comprehensive diagnostic criteria, at least 180 In addition to its rarity, it has non-pathognomonic cases have so far been reported in the English literature.4 clinical and radiological features and hence can It is therefore reasonable to assume that the previous mimic other lesions. Since its recognition as an rarity of this entity may be attributable to misdiagnosis. entity by the WHO in 1992, only two further cases of glandular odontogenic cyst have been seen at CASE 1 the authors’ institution and are hereby reported together with a summary of the review articles in A 60-year-old man presented at the diagnostic clinic at the English literature. Tygerberg Oral Health Centre with an asymptomatic swelling of the anterior mandible. -
Hybrid Central Giant Cell Granuloma and Central Ossifying Fibroma Case
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology 31 (2019) 258–263 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jomsmp Case Report Hybrid central giant cell granuloma and central ossifying fibroma: Case T report and literature review ⁎ A. Raia, , S.A. Ahmadb, M. Saleemc, M. Faisald a Associate Professor, Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, India b Associate Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, India c Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, India d Professor, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty, of dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, India ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) and central ossifying fibroma (COF) are clinicopathologically distinct Central giant cell granuloma entities commonly included in the differential diagnosis of benign focal central tumors. Hybrid CGCG-COF isa CGCG combined lesion characterized by the presence of microscopically large areas with features of CGCG, and large Central ossifying fibroma areas with features of COF within a single clinical lesion, separated from each other by a transition zone. COF We report a hybrid CGCG-COF lesion in a 31 year old female patient which presented as a painless right Hybrid tumor mandibular swelling of 6 months duration. The existing literature review revealed only 6 similar cases reported Hybrid lesion Combined lesion so far. The presence of impacted tooth in association with the hybrid CGCG-COF has been reported for the first Fibrosseous lesion time. A thorough review of clinical, histopathological and radiological aspects of this interesting entity is pre- sented. -
Hybrid Ameloblastoma and Central Giant Cell Lesion: Challenge of Early Diagnosis
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(2):e204-8. Hybrid ameloblastoma and CGCL Journal section: Oral Medicine and Pathology doi:10.4317/jced.56441 Publication Types: Case Report https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56441 Hybrid ameloblastoma and central giant cell lesion: Challenge of early diagnosis Rúbia-Teodoro Stuepp 1, Luiz-Henrique-Godoi Marola 2, Filipe Modolo 3, Rogério Gondak 3 1 Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil 2 Bucomaxillofacial Residence Program, University Hospital, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil 3 Department of Pathology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil Correspondence: Department of Pathology Federal University of Santa Catarina University Campus Trindade Florianópolis, Santa Catarina Brazil. Zip code: 88040-900 Stuepp RT, Marola LHG, Modolo F, Gondak R. Hybrid ameloblastoma [email protected] and central giant cell lesion: Challenge of early diagnosis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(2):e204-8. http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/volumenes/v12i2/jcedv12i2p204.pdf Received: 15/10/2019 Accepted: 09/12/2019 Article Number: 56441 http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm © Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F. B 96689336 - eISSN: 1989-5488 eMail: [email protected] Indexed in: Pubmed Pubmed Central® (PMC) Scopus DOI® System Abstract Hybrid lesions encompass the occurrence of different entities in one lesion. A 67-year-old woman was referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service for treatment of mandibular Central Giant Cell Lesion (CGCL) pre- viously diagnosed. Intraoral examination revealed edentulism and a painless swelling extending from the alveolar ridge to the buccal vestibule with hard consistency covered by normal mucosae, with unknown duration. -
Orthokeratinized Odontogenic Cyst a Clinicopathologic Study of 61 Cases
Orthokeratinized Odontogenic Cyst A Clinicopathologic Study of 61 Cases Qing Dong, MDS; Shuang Pan, MDS; Li-Sha Sun, PhD; Tie-Jun Li, DDS, PhD ● Context.—Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is mainly in the third and fourth decades (57.38%) with a a relatively uncommon developmental cyst comprising distinct predilection for males (72.13%). Six (9.84%) le- about 10% of cases that had been previously coded as sions were found in the maxilla and 55 (90.16%) in the odontogenic keratocysts. Odontogenic keratocyst was des- mandible. The most common sites were in the mandibular ignated as keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT) in the molar and ramus region. Of the 54 cases with radiographic new World Health Organization classification and OOC record, 47 (87.04%) were unilocular and 7 (12.96%) were should be distinguished from KCOT for differences in his- multilocular radiolucencies. Twenty-seven of the 54 cysts tologic features and biologic behavior. were associated with an impacted tooth. Follow-up of 42 Objective.—To analyze the clinicopathologic features of patients revealed no recurrence during an average period 61 cases of OOC in a Chinese population. of 76.8 months after surgery. Compared with KCOTs, ex- Design.—Clinicopathologic analysis was performed on pression level of Ki-67 and p63 was significantly lower in 61 cases of OOC. Immunohistochemical expression of Ki- OOCs, suggesting a lower proliferative activity. 67 and p63 was evaluated in 15 OOCs and 15 typical Conclusion.—Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst is clin- KCOTs. icopathologically distinct from KCOT and should consti- Results.—The 61 patients with OOC ranged from 13 to tute its own clinical entity.