<<

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE

provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Oral EXTRA (2006) 42, 287– 290

available at www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage: http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/journal/ooex

CASE REPORT A case report of a hybrid odontogenic tumour: Ameloblastoma and adenomatoid odontogenic tumour in calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour

Weiping Zhang, Yu Chen *, Ning Geng, Dongmei Bao, Mingzhong Yang

Department of Oral Pathology, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, No. 14, 3-section, Renminnan Road, Chengdu 610041, PR China

Received 23 May 2006; received in revised form 27 June 2006; accepted 7 July 2006

KEYWORDS Summary A hybrid odontogenic tumour comprising three distinct lesions is extremely rare. Ameloblastoma; We presented a hybrid odontogenic tumour composed of a calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour Adenomatoid odontogenic (CCOT), a solid multicystic ameloblastoma (A-S/M) and an adenomatoid odontogenic tumour tumour; (AOT). This tumour was observed in the anterior area of the of a 64-year-old Chinese Calcifying odontogenic woman. Masses of ghost epithelial cells with the characteristics of CCOT were seen in the lining of the cyst. The odontogenic epithelia with the features of A-S/M and AOT were also observed. c 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Introduction Case report

In the oral maxillofacial region, calcifying cystic odonto- On July 19, 2001, a 64-year-old woman was referred to the genic tumour (CCOT), solid multicystic ameloblastoma (A- West China College of Stomatology, Chengdu, China, for a S/M) and adenomatoid odontogenic tumour (AOT) are painless enlarging mass in the anterior of the mandible re- well-recognised whereas hybrid odontogenic tumours have gion with a history of 16 months duration. The patient sta- been rarely reported.1–17 The previously reported hybrid ted that the lesion had grown gradually in the past year. odontogenic tumours usually comprised two types of odon- The mass enlarged and paraesthesia appeared in the lower togenic tumours. However, no hybrid odontogenic tumour lip left side 20 days prior to the hospital visit. Physical with the definite components of CCOT, A-S/M and AOT examination revealed an obvious mass in the anterior of simultaneously in one lesion has been well-described in the mandible, with the size of about 3 · 3.5 · 1cm3. Part the English literatures so far. of the lesion was felt to fluctuate. re- vealed a large intraosseous cystic lesion with multiple radi- * Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 28 85501465; fax: +86 28 opaque clusters and a well-demarcated border in the 85582167. E-mail addresses: [email protected], yourzhwp@yahoo. anterior of the mandible. The cyst extended from the left com.cn (Y. Chen). first molar region to the right second premolar region. An

1741-9409/$ - see front matter c 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ooe.2006.07.003 288 W. Zhang et al. unerupted left lateral incisor was also detected in the cystic 1962.5 COC has been classified as calcifying cystic odonto- lesion (Fig. 1). A prior to was done, and the genic tumour (CCOT) according to the most recently estab- histopathologic diagnosis was the CCOT. Under general lished histopathological criteria of the World Health anesthesia, an excision of the lesion was performed on the mandible left side via the interoral approach and the seg- mental resection of the mandible was performed from the left first molar region to the right first molar region. The right seventh and eighth ribs were taken to repair the man- dibular defect. The histopathologic diagnosis after the sur- gery is a hybrid odontogenic tumour characteristic of CCOT, A-S/M and AOT. No recurrence occurred during the post-surgical follow-up of three years. Histological examination revealed a hybrid odontogenic tumour, showing the histopathological characteristics of CCOT, A-S/M and AOT, which accounted for about 60%, 25% and 15% of the lesion, respectively. Nests of ghost epithelial cells were observed in the lining of ameloblasto- matous or in the fibrous capsule (Fig. 2a), sug- gesting the characteristics of CCOT. Deposits of scattered dentinoid or calcified materials were also noted. Further- more, follicular islands of odontogenic epithelium were detected within a fibrous stroma. The basal cells of some islands of odontogenic epithelium were columnar and hyper- chromatic, and were lined up in a Palisade fashion with re- versed polarity (Fig. 2b). The central cells were sometimes loosely arranged and resembled the of the enamel organ, which fulfilled the ameloblastic histolog- ical criteria. Variably sized solid nodules of cuboidal or columnar cells of odontogenic epithelia in the form of ro- settes and duct-like structures were also observed in the connective tissue capsule of the cyst (Fig. 2c). In addition to forming ducts, the cuboidal or columnar cells formed con- voluted cords in a complicated pattern that often exhibited invaginations. Based on its diverse histopathological fea- tures, the pathological diagnosis of a hybrid odontogenic tumour composed of CCOT, A-S/M and AOT was made.

Discussion

Calcifying (COC) is an uncommon odonto- genic lesion, which was first described by Gorlin et al in

Figure 2 (a) Ghost cells of CCOT: pale, eosinophilic, and swollen ghost cells lost their nuclei but they showed a faint outline of the cellular and the nuclear membrane. (b) Follicular islands of odontogenic epithelium within a fibrous stroma, the central cells were sometimes loosely arranged and resembled the satellite reticulum of the enamel organ, basal cell is Figure 1 Panoramic radiograph revealing a large intraosseous hyperchromatism, vacuolisation and nuclear polarisation.- cystic lesion with multiple radiopaque clusters and an un- component of A-S/M. (c) Variable sizes of solid modules of erupted left lateral incisor in the anterior of the mandible. The cuboidal or columnar cells of odontogenic epithelia in the form cyst extended from the left first molar region to the right of rosettes and duct-like structures in the connective tissue second premolar region. The roots of the teeth covered by this capsule of the cyst - component of AOT (HE stain, original lesion were partially resorbed. magnification 200·). A case report of a hybrid odontogenic tumour 289

Organization (WHO).1 The microscopic feature of CCOT is China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University) and Dr characterised by the lining of a well-defined ameloblasto- Weihua Zhang (Department of civil engineering, Hongkong matous epithelium with variable amounts of ghost cells. University of science and technology) for their valuable ad- Several arguments have been proposed regarding the nature vice on the article writing. of ghost cells. Some studies18,19 suggested that the ghost cells might present the product of abortive enamel matrix References in odontogenic epithelium because enamel proteins were immunohistochemically expressed in the ghost cells. How- 3,15 1. Kleihues P, Sobin LH. Odontogenic tumours. In: Barnes L, ever, other studies indicated that the ghost cells repre- Eveson J, Reichart P, Siransky D, editors. World health sented different stages of normal and aberrant keratin organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics formation or the metaplastic transformation and coagula- of tumours of the head and neck. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. p. tive necrosis of the odontogenic epithelium. 284–328. The components of other odontogenic tumours are often 2. Yoon JH, Kim HJ, Yook JI, Cha IH, Ellis GL, Kim J. Hybrid observed in CCOT, and the most common one is odon- odontogenic tumour of calcifying odontogenic cyst and ame- toma.2,3,5–8,10 A-S/M,2–4,9,11 AOT,8,13 odontoameloblas- loblastic fibroma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol toma (OA),10 ameloblastic fibroma (AF),2,11 ameloblastic Endod 2004;98:80–4. 3. Hong SP, Ellis GL, Hartman KS. Calcifying odontogenic cyst: a fibro- (AFO)6,11 and odontogenic myxofibroma 4 review of ninety-two cases with reevaluation of their nature (OM) have also been identified as components of CCOT. as or , the nature of ghost cells, and Furthermore, a previous study had reported a case of odon- subclassification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72: togenic ghost cell carcinoma (OGCC) with some structures 56–64. 16 like those of A-S/M and AOT. 4. Li T-J, Yu S-F. Clinicopathologic spectrum of the so- The biological mechanism causing such a unique mix- called calcifying odontogenic cysts. A study of 21 ture has not been well-known up to now. The transforma- intraosseous cases with reconsideration of the terminol- tion from one lesion to another seems to be a possible ogy and classification. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27: pathogenic mechanism.2 However, it is widely considered 372–84. that the development of CCOT which possesses the fea- 5. Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ, Clausen FP, Vicker RA. The calcifying odontogenic cyst: a possible analogue of the cutaneous tures of other odontogenic tumours results in the develop- calcifying epithelioma of malherbe. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral ment of these tumours secondarily, rather than that these Pathol 1962;15:1235–43. tumours are themselves secondary phenomena of a pre- 6. Praetorius F, Hjorting Hansen E, Gorlin Rj, Vickers RA. 6,7,13 existing odontogenic tumour. Odontogenic tumours Calcifying odontogenic cyst: range, variations and neoplastic originate from odontogenic epithelium, which has the potential. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:227–40. potentiality for diverse differentiations and mesenchymal 7. Shear M. Developmental odontogenic cysts. An update. J Oral induction.5 In this case, the proliferation of strands of Pathol Med 1994;23:1–11. odontogenic epithelium from the lining of the cyst resem- 8. Freedman PD, Lumerman H, Gee JK. Calcifying odontogenic bled primary ectomesenchymal induction of the dental cyst. A review and analysis of seventy cases. Oral Surg Oral lamina, and the associated condensation of cells within Med Oral Pathol 1975;40:93–106. 9. Buchner A. The central (intraosseous) calcifying odontogenic the stroma also resembled primary ectomesenchymal 12 cyst: an analysis of 215 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; induction of the dental lamina. Abrams and Howell 49:330–9. pointed out that the combined occurrence of CCOT with 10. Altini M, Farman AG. The calcifying odontogenic cyst. Eight another odontogenic lesion could be expected because of new cases and a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med the multipotentiality of the odontogenic epithelium, which Oral Pathol 1975;40:751–9. results from the processes of differentiation and degener- 11. Takeda Y, Suzuki A, Yamamoto H. Histopathologic study of ation of the odontogenic epithelium. Praetorius et al.6 be- epithelial components in the connective tissue wall of uniloc- lieved that what appeared to be an associated odontogenic ular type of calcifying odontogenic cyst. J Oral Pathol Med tumour was simply an integral part of the entire lesion 1990;19:108–13. developing from the wall of CCOT. In addition, Tanaka 12. Abrams AM, Howell FV. The calcifying odontogenic cyst. Report of four cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968; et al.20 reported a case of CCOT, which recurred one year 25:594–606. after surgery with the element of malignant odontogenic 13. Zeitoun IM, Dhanrajani PJ, Mosadomi HA. Adenomatoid odon- tumour. It appeared that the lesion might represent differ- togenic tumour arising in a calcifying odontogenic cyst. J Oral ent directions that the tumour may take, depending on the Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:634–7. initial inductive stimulus, the degree of ‘‘odontogenesis’’ 14. Ide F, Obara K, Mishima K, Saito I. Ameloblastoma ex calcifying prior to the application of the stimulus, and individual odontogenic cyst (dentinogenic ghost cell tumour). J Oral human variability.2,11,20 Therefore, we speculate that Pathol Med 2005;34:511–2. A-S/M and AOT in the lesion might have been induced by 15. Kusama K, Katayama Y, Oba K, Ishige T, Kebusa Y, Okazawa J, the epithelium of CCOT in the present case. et al. expression of hard alpha-keratins in pilomatrixoma, craniopharygioma, and calcifying odontogenic cyst. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;123:376–81. 16. Cheng Y, Long X, Li X, Bian Z, Chen X, Yang X. Clinical and radiological features of odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: Acknowledgements review of the literature and report of four new cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:152–7. The case report is funded by Sichuan University. We thank 17. Lin CC, Chen CH, Lin LM, Chen YK, Wright JM, Kessler HP, et al. Professor Zhixiu He (Department of oral pathology, West Calcifying odontogenic cyst with ameloblastic fibroma: report 290 W. Zhang et al.

of three cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2004;98: 19. Yoshida M, Kumamoto H, Ooya K, Mayanagl H. Histopatholo- 451–60. gical and immunohistochemical analysis of calcifying odonto- 18. Takata T, Zhao M, Uchida Y, Wang T, Aoki T, Bartlett JD, et al. genic cysts. J Oral Pathol 2001;30:582–8. Immunohistochemical detection and distribution of enamelysin 20. Tanaka H, Takigawa T, Owo M, Matsumoto H, Fukumoto W. A (MMP-20) in human odontogenic tumours. J Dent Res case of malignant transformation of calcifying of odontogenic 2000;79:1608–13. cyst. Jpn J Oral Maxiillofac 1975;21:664. Japanese.