DOCSLIB.ORG

Richmond Bicycle Master Plan 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Richmond Bicycle Master Plan 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Of RiChmOnd Jakob Helmboldt Travis Bridewell Thomas Flynn SpeCial thankS tO Max Hepp-Buchanan, Sports Backers COnSultant team Melissa Miklus, ASLA Charlie Denney Fionnuala Quinn Jay Decker Nick Falbo Katie Perumbeti Scudder Wagg Jacob Thornton Richmond Bicycle Master Plan 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS introduCtiOn Overview 1-1 appendix a - deSign guidelineS PurposeandBackground 1-1 Overview A-1 Vision 1-4 DesignNeedsofBicyclists A-2 Goals 1-4 BicycleFacilitySelection A-3 ThePlanningProcessandPublicInvolvement 1-7 SharedRoadways A-5 BenefitsOfABicycleFriendlyCommunity 1-8 SeparatedBikeways A-7 CycleTracks A-9 exiSting COnditiOnS SeparatedBikewaysatIntersections A-12 Overview 2-1 BikewaySigning A-17 ExistingBikeways 2-1 RetrofittingStreetstoAddBikeways A-19 ExistingPlanReview 2-3 SharedUsePaths A-22 BicycleDemandAnalysis 2-5 BikewaySupportandMaintenance A-27 PublicComments 2-16 StandardsCompliance A-29 ProgramsandPolicies 2-18 appendix B - BiCyCle demand netwORk ReCOmmendatiOnS Overview B-1 Overview 3-1 BicycleSuitabilityIndexMethodology B-1 Methodology 3-1 TheWHO:TypesofBicyclists 3-2 appendix C - funding ReSOuRCeS TheWHERE:DemandandSupply 3-3 Overview C-1 TheWHICH:FacilityType 3-3 FederalFundingSources C-1 ImplementationConsiderationsofSelectingFacilityTypes 3-7 StateFundingSources C-3 SignificantBarriersandConflictPoints 3-8 LocalGovernmentFundingSources C-3 NetworkRefinement 3-8 PrivateandNon-ProfitFundingSources C-4 ProjectPrioritizationProcess 3-10 PlanningLevelCostEstimates 3-14 appendix d - puBliC OutReaCh DemonstrationProjects 3-19 Overview D-1 PublicInputPlan D-2 implementatiOn StRategieS ProjectResources D-3 Overview 4-1 PublicCommentFormResponses D-6 KeyActionSteps 4-1 PerformanceMeasures 4-5 KeyPartnersinImplementation 4-5 Communication,Collaboration,andImplementation 4-7 GeneralActionStepsandActionStepsbyGoal 4-8 Richmond Bicycle Master Plan 2014 Introduction OVERVIEW CHAPTER CONTENTS The City of Richmond Bicycle Master Plan will guide the city and other local partners in improving the existing bicycle infrastructure, constructing new facilities for bicyclists Overview in the city,1 and fostering a “bicycling culture” through the development of related programs and policies. This Plan strives to diversify mobility (including transportation and recreation) for residents and visitors by enhancing the network of bicycle infrastructure and improving safety to create an environment suitable for a wide variety of users. PurPOse and BackgrOund Final recommendations are built on recent strides made in implementing bicycling infrastructure as well as the considerable momentum gathering for the world road cycling championships to be held in Richmond in 2015. visiOn The Bicycle Master Plan combines adopted local and regional planning efforts with new research, analysis, and public engagement. The result is an up-to-date framework gOals for moving forward with tangible bicycle-related improvements. Beyond physical improvements, the Plan also recommends further exploration of policies and programs to encourage people to increase bicycle trip frequency, interact safely in a multi-modal environment, and grow as a community with the needs of bicyclists in the forefront of The Planning PrOcess and PuBlic planning and design initiatives. invOlvemenT As a League of American Bicyclists certified community, Richmond possesses a firm foundation of efforts to increase bicycle mode share and provide a safe, comfortable BenefiTs Of a Bicycle friendly environment for bicyclists of all ages and abilities. Advancing engineering, education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation and planning will be key components of planning for the future of the Richmond community. This Plan focuses mainly on the engineering component, with the purpose of refining the network to create a cOmmuniTy hierarchy of routes and illustrating demonstration projects that will have a high impact on improving the environment. This engineering approach will thereby contribute to encouraging bicycle use by improving the design of existing roadways and facilities. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND a fOcus On imPlemenTaTiOn A key focus for this project is to identify specific and readily implementable projects that will reap measurable benefits to users of the city streets and visible improvements to the livability of the city. Therefore, the Richmond Bicycle Master Plan has been developed with the twin objectives of: • Providing the blueprint for a comprehensive system in the city that makes bicycling for all purposes and by all users accessible, safe, and desirable; and • Providing a strong, strategic funding plan for bicycle facility expansion, improvement, and implementation citywide. The Bicycle Master Plan will include: • A vision, goals, and benchmarks • A comprehensive system of connectivity and route selection criteria • A classification system and standards for Public Works which conform to AASHTO and NACTO standards that clarifies the nature of recommended improvements • Connections to other transportation modes • Project prioritization criteria with facility type, action needed, and time frame identified • A map representing the future vision of bike facilities for Richmond Introduction | 1-1 Figure 1-1: Existing Bicycling Conditions in Richmond Downtown Richmond 0 0.25 0.5 Miles 1-2 | Introduction Richmond Bicycle Master Plan 2014 Implementation of the bikeway network consists of discreet steps completed sequentially, from ranking State of Cycling Report @ Virginia Commonwealth and phasing of each project to application of design standards, development of capital and maintenance University (2010): As part of Virginia Commonwealth costs, funding, and a capital improvement plan. Creation of an implementable bicycling network includes University’s efforts to create a sustainable campus coordination with city staff from Planning and Community Development, Public Works, and Parks environment, this report was prepared looking at and Recreation to formulate an implementation strategy that includes details on cost, responsible bicycling as a key element of transportation planning. department, scheduling, and appropriate funding. While the university drafted its first Climate Action Plan, the administration had already begun to move PasT and currenT Plans toward a more sustainable campus and increase the The Bicycle Master Plan connects with past and current planning efforts conducted at the city, regional, mode share of bicycling through a variety of initiatives, and Commonwealth levels including the following studies and reports. including adding more bicycle racks on campus. The Report described the current state of cycling on Richmond Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2004): campus and provided recommendations for policies, This study provided a detailed plan for enhancing programs, and infrastructure improvements to increase bicycle and pedestrian options in the Richmond region, the bicycling rates. including the city. The completed plan was accepted by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) as a City of Richmond Master Plan (2000-2010): The Master Plan is a key study, leaving it up to area localities to adopt the plan or policy document determining the pattern of new development and to incorporate its elements into their comprehensive redevelopment, including where road improvements should occur. The plans. Elements of the plan have been incorporated into Master Plan sets policy and direction for public and private investment the Bicycle and Pedestrian element of the MPO 2031 in the city. All jurisdictions within the Commonwealth of Virginia are Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). required to prepare and adopt such a plan and update it regularly. In addition to the Master Plan, the city has adopted a Downtown Plan as Mayor’s Pedestrian, Bicycling and Trails Planning Commission Report (2010): This well as numerous detailed neighborhood plans. report was generated based on the work of the Pedestrian and Bicycling Commission, appointed by Mayor Dwight C. Jones in 2010, to give his State Bicycling Policy Plan (2011): The Virginia Department of administration advice on ways to incorporate walking and bicycling as viable Transportation (VDOT) developed the State Bicycle Policy methods of transportation in the city of Richmond and to support pedestrian Plan to ensure that bicyclists are considered as an integral and bicycle travel by becoming a community where walking and bicycling are component of Virginia’s multimodal transportation system, integral parts of the city’s transportation system. The Bicycle, Pedestrian and and to provide bicycle policy recommendations guiding the Trails Coordinator position, established in 2011, was a key recommendation planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance that grew out of the Commission report produced in 2010. of bicycle accommodations. The plan identifies strategies and opportunities for improving bicycling and integrating Richmond Strategic Multimodal Transportation Plan bicycling into the transportation network and increasing the (Richmond Connects, 2013): This Plan, known as rate of bicycling throughout Virginia. The Plan contains four Richmond Connects, focused on projects and programs main recommendations: that would help to transform Richmond’s transportation • Clarifying bicycle accommodation policies network to provide residents with alternatives to single • Providing staff with resources to integrate the occupancy vehicle travel. Recommendations included in requirements of bicyclists
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 DRAFT Bicycle Master Plan
    Chapter 4: Design and Maintenance Guidance Chapter 4 provides recommended guidance on bicycle facility design and maintenance practices. It includes a discussion of the existing standards that guide street design in Bellingham followed by descriptions of bicycle facility types and intersection treatments that are new or uncommon in the City. Detailed design considerations including design guidance for travel lane widths, corner curb radii and wayfinding are presented in Appendix D. Public Works Development Guidelines and Improvement Standards Currently, street design in Bellingham is guided by the Public Works Development Guidelines and Improvements Standards, which were adopted in 2001. The guidelines contain provisions for development and improvement of bicycle facilities, including: standards signs, signals, and markings, roadway facilities, bicycle lanes, and bicycle parking.1 These design guidelines were developed based on the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and the Washington State Department of Transportation Design Manual. For local roadways, WSDOT instructs local jurisdictions to use the latest addition of the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. It is recommended that the existing guidelines and the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities should continue to be used in the development of bicycle facilities. Those documents are not intended to be replaced by the guidance presented here; however, there are instances where additional guidance will be useful in implementing this Plan. This guidance is presented for consideration and possible integration into the Bellingham Public Works Development Guidelines and Improvements Standards. In all cases, the recommendations in this chapter are consistent with current Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidance and recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Course Non-Motorised Transport Author
    Division 44 Environment and Infrastructure Sector Project „Transport Policy Advice“ Training Course: Non-motorised Transport Training Course on Non-motorised Transport Training Course Non-motorised Transport Author: Walter Hook Findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this document are based on infor- Editor: mation gathered by GTZ and its consultants, Deutsche Gesellschaft für partners, and contributors from reliable Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH sources. P.O. Box 5180 GTZ does not, however, guarantee the D-65726 Eschborn, Germany accuracy or completeness of information in http://www.gtz.de this document, and cannot be held responsible Division 44 for any errors, omissions or losses which Environment and Infrastructure emerge from its use. Sector Project „Transport Policy Advice“ Commissioned by About the author Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) Walter Hook received his PhD in Urban Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40 Planning from Columbia University in 1996. D-53113 Bonn, Germany He has served as the Executive Director of the http://www.bmz.de Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) since 1994. He has also served Manager: as adjunct faculty at Columbia University’s Manfred Breithaupt Graduate School of Urban Planning. ITDP is a non-governmental organization dedicated to Comments or feedback? encouraging and implementing We would welcome any of your comments or environmentally sustainable transportation suggestions, on any aspect of the Training policies and projects in developing countries. Course, by e-mail to [email protected], or by surface mail to: Additional contributors Manfred Breithaupt This Module also contains chapters and GTZ, Division 44 material from: P.O. Box 5180 Oscar Diaz D-65726 Eschborn Michael King Germany (Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates) Cover Photo: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond: Evolution of a City As Shown Through Maps at the Library of Virginia
    RICHMOND: EVOLUTION OF A CITY AS SHOWN THROUGH MAPS AT THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA The City of Richmond evolved from a trading post at Shockoe Creek to become Virginia’s capital city. In 1737 William Mayo, a friend of William Byrd II, completed his survey of the town of Richmond. His plan was one common to the Tidewater, a rectangular town design located east of Shockoe Creek. That year, Byrd held a lottery to sell off town lots. Mayo’s original plan included 112 numbered lots, 14 lots designated by letters, and two without any identification. Lots 97 and 98 were set aside for the Henrico Parish vestry, and St. John’s Church was erected on them in 1741. In 1742 Virginia’s General Assembly granted Richmond a town charter. Byrd’s son, William Byrd III, in debt and seeking a way to pay off his creditors, decided to hold a lottery in 1768 to sell additional lots west of Shockoe Creek. When Virginia’s capital moved from Williamsburg to Richmond in 1780, Shockoe Hill was chosen as the site for the new capitol building; it would look over the town of Richmond that had developed on flat land adjacent to the James River. Nine directors, one of whom was Thomas Jefferson, were appointed to plan Virginia’s new capital. Jefferson proposed a gridiron plan for Shockoe Hill that would set apart the platted portion of “Richmond Town” from the new capitol. There would be two major connecting streets, Main and Cary, and “Capitol Square” would consist of three buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Constrained List of Projects
    ConnectRVA 2045 - Cost Constrained List of Regional Projects - Time Band 1 (FY22-FY27) Committed Time-Band 1 UPC Description Cost (Thousands) Prev FY22 FY23-FY27 Balance Total 110394 #HB2.FY17 RTE 64 - MAJOR WIDENING GARVEE DEBT SERVICE $ 77,238.00 $ 18,080.00 $ 4,925.00 $ 9,849.00 $ 14,774.00 $ 44,385.00 111984 #SMART18 - I-95 AUXLANES B/W RTE.288/RTE.10-GARVEE DEBT SERV $ 34,490.00 $ 1,066.00 $ 813.00 $ 4,002.00 $ 4,815.00 $ 28,609.00 111981 #SMART18 - BBC PH 1-BAILEY BR, BRAD MCNEER-GARVEE DEBT SERV$ 29,203.00 $ - $ 557.00 $ 3,464.00 $ 4,021.00 $ 25,183.00 112974 RTE 668 (WOOLRIDGE ROAD, RT 288-OLD HUNDRED ROAD) EXTENSION$ 47,000.00 $ 15,300.00 $ 800.00 $ 8,432.00 $ 9,232.00 $ 22,468.00 110393 #HB2.FY17 RT 10 (BERM TRI TO MEADOWV) GARVEE DEBT SERVICE $ 32,546.00 $ 4,271.00 $ 2,113.00 $ 4,227.00 $ 6,340.00 $ 21,934.00 101492 RICHMOND REGION-WIDE TRAFFIC/OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENTS $ 34,540.00 $ 555.00 $ - $ 20,656.00 $ 20,656.00 $ 13,329.00 109310 #HB2.FY17 SHOCKOE VALLEY ST IMPROVEMENT $ 39,250.00 $ 17,846.00 $ 2,577.00 $ 7,620.00 $ 10,197.00 $ 11,207.00 118470 W BROAD ST PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS - GLENSIDE DR$ 11,272.00 $ - $ - $ 2,195.00 $ 2,195.00 $ 9,077.00 118597 W BROAD ST INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT DOMINION AND COX$ 13,952.00 $ 379.00 $ - $ 8,327.00 $ 8,327.00 $ 5,246.00 50529 RTE 9999 (THREE CHOPT ROAD) WIDEN TO 4 LANES $ 30,819.00 $ 24,654.00 $ - $ 962.00 $ 962.00 $ 5,203.00 107088 RTE 636 - NASH ROAD EXTENSION $ 30,052.00 $ 8,122.00 $ 878.00 $ 16,216.00 $ 17,094.00 $ 4,836.00 118153 BROOK ROAD & HILLIARD ROAD TRAIL $ 4,757.00 $ - $ - $ 2,196.00 $ 2,196.00 $ 2,561.00 118146 ROUTE 1 (HOLIDAY LANE - WILLIS ROAD) SHARED-USE PATH $ 4,370.00 $ - $ - $ 1,832.00 $ 1,832.00 $ 2,538.00 113323 RTE 632 (FAIRGROUND ROAD) EXTENSION $ 6,101.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 563.00 $ 1,734.00 $ 2,297.00 $ 2,303.00 101034 #HB2.FY17 RTE 6 PATTERSON AVE AT PARHAM RD INTERSECTION $ 14,000.00 $ 9,358.00 $ 4,210.00 $ - $ 4,210.00 $ 432.00 117049 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada Project Team
    Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada Project Team Project Leads: Nancy Smith Lea, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Dr. Ray Tomalty, School of Urban Planning, McGill University Researchers: Jiya Benni, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Dr. Marvin Macaraig, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Julia Malmo-Laycock, School of Urban Planning, McGill University Report Design: Jiya Benni, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Cover Photo: Tour de l’ile, Go Bike Montreal Festival, Montreal by Maxime Juneau/APMJ Project Partner: Please cite as: Benni, J., Macaraig, M., Malmo-Laycock, J., Smith Lea, N. & Tomalty, R. (2019). Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada. Toronto: Clean Air Partnership. CONTENTS List of Figures 4 List of Tables 7 Executive Summary 8 1. Introduction 12 2. Costs of Bicycle Infrastructure Measures 13 Introduction 14 On-street facilities 16 Intersection & crossing treatments 26 Traffic calming treatments 32 Off-street facilities 39 Accessory & support features 43 3. Costs of Cycling Programs 51 Introduction 52 Training programs 54 Repair & maintenance 58 Events 60 Supports & programs 63 Conclusion 71 References 72 Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Bollard protected cycle track on Bloor Street, Toronto, ON ..................................................... 16 Figure 2: Adjustable concrete barrier protected cycle track on Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, ON ............ 17 Figure 3: Concrete median protected cycle track on Pandora Ave in Victoria, BC ............................ 18 Figure 4: Pandora Avenue Protected Bicycle Lane Facility Map ............................................................ 19 Figure 5: Floating Bus Stop on Pandora Avenue ........................................................................................ 19 Figure 6: Raised pedestrian crossings on Pandora Avenue .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    THE LIBRARY BOARD of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2021 AGENDA 10:00 a.m. The Library Board Meeting Electronic Meeting Members of the public may view the meeting at https://www.youtube.com/user/LibraryofVa For assistance during the meeting, please call the Office of the Librarian at 804-692-3535 ~ In the event of technical difficulties with the above, the meeting will be moved to the Library’s GoToWebinar platform. To join, dial 1-562-247-8422 (Public Access Pin: 611-738-000). I. Call to Order/Quorum L. Preston Bryant Jr., Chair II. Approval of Agenda The Board III. Welcome to Visitors and Staff L. Preston Bryant Jr. IV. Approval of the Library Board Minutes of January 11, 2021 The Board V. Committee/Division Reports A. Committee/Division Reports Archival, Collections, and Records Barbara Vines Little Management Services Committee Education, Outreach, and Research Services Committee Kathy Johnson Bowles Legislative and Finance Committee R. Chambliss Light Jr. Public Library Development Committee Mark Miller Action Item: Adoption of Revised Planning for Library Excellence Library of Virginia Foundation Scott Dodson Nominating Committee Blythe Ann Scott B. Report of the Librarian of Virginia Sandra G. Treadway C. Report of the Chair L. Preston Bryant Jr. VII. Old or New Business VI. Adjournment Next meeting: June 28, 2021 THE LIBRARY BOARD MEETING Library of Virginia January 11, 2021 The Library Board met electronically on Monday, January 11, 2021, via Zoom Internet Conferencing and the LVA YouTube channel live broadcast. I. CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME/QUORUM L. Preston Bryant Jr., chair, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m., and confirmed that a quorum of Board members were present.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAC Junior Track Cycling Camp  May 3-4, 2014  USOC Memorial Park Velodrome Colorado Springs, CO USAC Permit - Pending
    BRAC Junior Track Cycling Camp May 3-4, 2014 USOC Memorial Park Velodrome Colorado Springs, CO USAC Permit - Pending We are pleased to announce the first official 2014 BRAC Junior Track Cycling Camp. The camp takes place over the weekend of May 3-4. We will learn to ride on the USOC Memorial Park Velodrome, which is located in Colorado Springs. The riders will also get to spend Saturday night at the Olympic Training Center. Three meals from the training center are included along with snacks and lunch at the velodrome on Sunday. During camp riders will learn how to ride on the track. This includes learning the standard means of communication, common riding practices, and predictable riding. All which ensure safety while racing and training on the track. We will also go over the track bicycle in general, cover how to change gears, and give advice on which gears to ride for certain events and training. Finally we will learn about the different track races and get to practice racing! It should be noted that most track racing for juniors is scheduled for the new Boulder Valley Velodrome (BVV) in Erie. In order to race at the BVV riders must have completed a track cycling certification course. This camp is a wonderful opportunity to satisfy the certification process and get a head start on the track cycling season! Who Can Attend: Male and Female riders with a current racing age between 11-18. Riders must hold a 2014 USA Cycling Road/Track racing license. Dates/Times: Saturday, May 3rd 10:00am* – Sunday, May 4th 2:00pm *We understand many Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Master Plan: 2012
    BICYCLE MASTER PLAN: 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREPARED FOR V VISION STATEMENT VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IX CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1 BICYCLING IN MESA 1 THE BENEFITS OF BICYCLING 3 BICYCLE TRIP AND RIDER CHARACTERISTICS 6 BICYCLE USE IN MESA 8 PAST BICYCLE PLANNING EFFORTS 12 REGIONAL PLANNING & COORDINATION EFFORTS 15 WHY MESA NEEDS AN UPDATED BICYCLE PLAN 20 PLAN UPDATE PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM 23 CHAPTER 2 - GOALS & OBJECTIVES 25 PURPOSE OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 25 GOAL ONE 27 GOAL TWO 28 GOAL THREE 29 GOAL FOUR 30 GOAL FIVE 31 i CHAPTER 3 - EDUCATION, ENCOURAGEMENT, AND ENFORCEMENT 33 INTRODUCTION 33 MESARIDES! 34 EDUCATION 35 ENCOURAGEMENT 38 ENFORCEMENT 42 CHAPTER 4 - BICYCLE FACILITIES AND DESIGN OPTIONS 47 INTRODUCTION 47 BASIC ELEMENTS 48 WAYFINDING 52 BICYCLE PARKING DESIGN STANDARDS 53 BICYCLE ACCESSIBILITY 58 CHAPTER 5 - MESA’S BICYCLE NETWORK 61 INTRODUCTION 61 MESA’S NETWORK OF THE FUTURE 65 DEVELOPING A RECOMMENDED FUTURE NETWORK 68 METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY NEEDS 72 ii CHAPTER 6 - IMPLEMENTATION, EVALUATION, AND FUNDING 101 INTRODUCTION 101 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 103 IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA 104 PROJECT PRIORITY RANKING 105 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROGRAM EXPANSION 122 ADDITIONAL STAFF REQUIREMENTS 124 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT 125 SUMMARY 130 APPENDIX A - THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN PROCESS 131 PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN 131 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND COMMUNITY INPUT PROCESS 132 BENEFITS OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM (PIP) 132 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM (PIP) PLAN 133 MESA BICYCLE
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form, “The Tuckahoe Apartments.” (14 June 2000)
    NPS Form 10- 900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Fonn (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. ...................................................... - - - ...........................................................................................................................................................................1. Name of Property historic name John Rolfe Apartments other nameslsite number DHR # 127-6513 ---------- 2. Location street & number 101 Tem~sfordLane not for publication NIA city or town Richmond vicinity state Virqinia code & county Independent Citv code 760 zip code 23226 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Presewation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this
    [Show full text]
  • - Sj Clty OH TOWN:
    Form 10-300 UNiTLll STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR iJul* 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM ENTRY NUMBER DATC (Typo all enfries - complete applicable sections) ~ .- ---EIAYMONT AND. OC HISTORIC: E1AY - .-- . - .- -. -..MONT. STREET AN,:, NLI~IIRER~ Ha9ton Street or Spottswood Road ClTI OR TOWN: C *.> L, E (in cit.) 760 Public Acquksiti~n: ZJ Occupied In Process Q Unoccupisd Ci Object I17 Both 0 Being Considered 0 Prsssrrotion ~ork in progrs.. 2 Agrlrvlturul 11 ;i Govsrnmant Ej Pork Tronsportotion Comments !i .. Commmrclo; :! Industrial Privots R.sidence ;.~1 0Other (SP~CI~J i + 1 [~-1 Eduro~ion~l i-1 Mititory Religious 1 i) E-~~~IO;,,~,.~~rid Museum Scientific i - -.-- ! -. - I (:XI% o Kiclimond, Department of Recreation and Parks / ~ W r- -~ - ~. -- lSTLIi, INI. NUMBER: ., W '1'1, >Io;.rii!c, Laurel Street !- STATE: VIRGINIA - -- City Hall - -- STREET AN<NUMBER: , -. .,... -4 '?c~~thand Broad Streets - . .- ;- sj ClTY OH TOWN: :. -. COOK ,? ,j ; Ri cI~II~<,~IcI - VIRGINIA 51 ' EXISTING SURVEYS . -~ liill~L,', 511UV1 . ,:$! : .) !li.otoric Iandmrks C~nmission-. Survey DIT~ i.1 ;LJ>, .,) *. 1971 0 Fader01 Stota 0 County 0 Local DEPDrl iR> i iH SUPVEI RECORDS: l.i.: is Historir Landmarks Commission- csrnrt ni,rz~~s;~: 9t1, S;Lrc!et State Office Buildine. Room 1116 1CITY 01< rOVi'i STATE: Richrnnil~, 1 . ..- Virginia Sicx. f,.oN.- ~ ~ . .. .~~ - - ~ --.-----.-.-....u-.,. - I (Check One) I C1 Exc.ll*nt Good 0 F.8, [IJ Ostsrior-ted 0 Rvnns 13 Unexposed (Check on~) (Check on.,, 0 Altered 1% Una11~r.d Cl Moved Onglnol Sate DESCRlQE THE PRESENT AND ORlGlNIL (11 known) WHISICAL APPEIRANCE MAYMON T The eclectic mansion at Maymont, designed in 1890 by Edgerton S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection Manual - Draft July 2015 6
    View the updated report: Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection Manual - JULY 17, 2015 The Minnesota Department of Transportation Draft is developing a statewide bicycle and pedestrian data collection program. This manual summarizes main elements of this program, including data collection goals, types of data to collect and best practices for sensor calibration and data analysis. The research phase of the program is expected to be completed in 2016, at which time the manual will be updated and issued as a final document. Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT Report No. MN/RC 2015-33 Office of Transit, Bicycle / Pedestrian Section [email protected] www.dot.state.mn.us/bike To request this document in an alternate format call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota) or email your request to [email protected]. Please request at least one week in advance. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC 2015-33 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection Manual - Draft July 2015 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Erik Minge, Cortney Falero, Greg Lindsey, Michael Petesch 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. SRF Consulting Group Inc. Humphrey School of Public One Carlson Parkway North Affairs, Office 295 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. Plymouth, MN 55447 University of Minnesota (c) 04301 301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation Draft Manual Office of Transit, Bicycle/Pedestrian Section Mail Stop 315 395 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond: Mooreland Farms 175
    174 Richmond: Mooreland Farms 175 RICHMOND: Friday, April 27, 2018 Westmoreland10 a.m. to 4.30 p.m. The Boxwood Garden Club Place Thanks Photo courtesy of Ashley Farley Rachel Davis and Built around World War I, this neighborhood offers close proximity to downtown and some of the city’s earliest and most intriguing architecturally-designed houses. From Helen Nunley classic 17th century English style Georgian homes to Mediterranean-inspired villas, Westmoreland Place has the look and feel of Old World Europe. Beginning in 1915 2018 Historic Garden there was a demand for residential construction that drove developers west. Showcasing Week Chairs work by renowned architectural firms such as Noland & Baskervill, these homes blend grand-scaled landscape with stately architecture. The Executive Mansion, the oldest governor’s mansion in the U.S. built and still used as a home, is also open for tour and is a short drive east of the tour area. Tuckahoe Plantation Hosted by The Boxwood Garden Club The Tuckahoe Garden Club of Westhampton Sneed’s Nursery & Garden Center, Strange’s Florist Greenhouse & Garden Center Short Three Chopt Garden Club Pump and Mechanicsville, Tweed, Williams The James River Garden Club & Sherrill and Gather. Chairmen Combo Ticket for three-day pass: $120 pp. available online only at www.vagarden- Rachel Davis and Helen Nunley week.org. Allows access to all three days of [email protected] Richmond touring - Wednesday, Thursday and Friday - featuring 19 properties in total. Tickets: $50 pp. $20 single-site. Tickets available on tour day at tour headquarters Group Tour Information: 20 or more people and at ticket table at 4703 Pocahontas Ave.
    [Show full text]