DOCSLIB.ORG

Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination "Concourse, concert ground and formal garden on top of hill. Cemetery beyond Conservatory, Reservoir on left has straight flaring sides with which walks with steps line up," caption on photograph written by Roland Cotterill, Secretary of Board of Park Commissioners, 1913 Photo by Frank H. Nowell, Photo #2695-22, Olmsted Brothers Volunteer Park Photo Album Courtesy of the National Park Service, Frederick Law Olmsted National Historic Site "...a birdseye view of Volunteer Park as taken from the water tower recently. We are very proud of this picture...inasmuch as it sets forth so comprehensively the great variety of landscape and other formal work which has been carried out in Volunteer Park in accordance with your plan." -Roland Cotterill Secretary of Board of Park Commissioners, to Olmsted Brothers, Oct 23, 1913 Submitted by Friends of Seattle’s Olmsted Parks February 2011 Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination Name Volunteer Park Year Built 1909-1910 (Common, present or historic) Street and Number 1400 East Prospect Street . Assessor’s File No. 2925049087 . Legal Description: The northeast quarter of the northeast quarter (NE ¼ NE ¼) of Section Twenty-nine (29) in Township Twenty-five (25) north (N) of Range Four (4) east (E), Willamette Meridian, also beginning at the northeast (NE) corner of the northeast quarter (NE ¼) of Section Twenty-nine (29) in Township Twenty-five (25) north (N) of Range Four (4) east (E), Willamette Meridian, thence south one degree thirty-six minutes forty-eight seconds (1°36’48”) west a distance of fourteen hundred thirty-three and fifty-two one- hundredths (1433.52) feet along the east line of Section 29 in Township 25 north Range 4 east, thence north (N) eighty-eight degrees eighteen minutes twenty-seven seconds (88°18’27”) west a distance of four hundred eighty-two and ten one-hundredths (482.10) feet, thence north (N) eighty-eight degrees eighteen minutes thirty-one seconds (88°18’31”) west a distance of two hundred seventy-two and five one-hundredths (272.05) feet, thence north (N) eighty-eight degrees eighteen minutes thirty-eight seconds (88°18’38”) west a distance of two hundred seventy-two and four one-hundredths (272.04) feet, thence north (N) eighty-eight degrees eighteen minutes twenty-nine seconds (88°18’29”) west a distance of three hundred eleven and seven one-hundredths (311.07) feet to a point on the west line of the northwest (NW) quarter of the northeast (NE) quarter of the northeast (NE) quarter of Section 29 in Township 25 north Range 4 east, thence north (N) one degree eighteen minutes twenty seconds east, more or less, a distance of fourteen hundred five and sixty-nine one- hundredths (1405.69) feet, more or less, to a point on the north line of Section 29 in Township 25 north Range 4 east, 2 Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination thence south (S) eighty-nine degrees thirty minutes and five seconds (89°30’05”) east a distance of one thousand three hundred forty-five (1345) feet, more or less, along the north line of Section 29 in Township 25 north Range 4 east to the point of beginning. Also the east one-half (E ½) of blocks E and F of Phinney’s Addition to the City of Seattle as recorded in Vol. 1, Page 175 of King County Plats. Also the portion of Eleventh (11th) Avenue North in the City of Seattle from the north line of Furth’s Addition to the City of Seattle and the north line of Phinney’s Addition to the City of Seattle as vacated by ordinance 26793. Plat Name: _________________ Block ___________________Lot ______________ Present Owner: Seattle Department of Parks & Recreation Present Use: Public Park, Reservoir Address: 100 Dexter Avenue, Seattle, WA 98109 Original Owner: Seattle Board of Park Commissioners Original Use: Public Park, Reservoir Site Architect: John Charles Olmsted, Olmsted Brothers Landscape Architects Builder: Seattle Board of Park Commissioners, Seattle Public Works Department 3 Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination Table of Contents I. Physical Description .................................................................................................. 5 A. Overall Character and Style B. Spatial Organization C. Vehicular and Pedestrian Circulation D. Topography and Grading E. Vegetation F. Buildings, Structures and Water Features G. Small-Scale Elements (Memorials, Site Furnishings, Artworks) II. Statement of Significance ......................................................................................23 A. Summary B. National, Local and Neighborhood Historic Contexts C. History of Volunteer Park D. Changes Since 1975 III. Bibliography……….............................................................................................44 IV. Appendices A. Illustrations …...........................................................................................52 1. Current Plans, Aerials and Diagrams 2. Current Photographs 3. Historic Plans/Aerials 4. Historic Photographs and Postcards B. Olmsted Plant Lists ..................................................................................97 C. Volunteer Park Timeline ..........................................................................98 4 Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination I. Physical Description Seattle’s Volunteer Park was designed by John Charles Olmsted (1852-1920), the senior partner of the national firm Olmsted Brothers Landscape Architects, located in Brookline, Massachusetts. The Olmsted brothers (John Charles and Frederick Law, Jr.) were trained in and continued the practice and design philosophy of their father, Frederick Law Olmsted, Sr. The senior Olmsted founded the profession of landscape architecture and designed New York’s Central Park, Brooklyn’s Prospect Park, the Boston park system, and hundreds of other parks, estates, campuses, exhibition grounds, subdivisions and other designed landscapes across the nation. John Charles Olmsted prepared a comprehensive park system plan for Seattle in 1903, meeting with city leaders during a month-long trip to Seattle. He expanded the plan in 1908 to include areas recently annexed to the City, including Columbia City, Ballard and West Seattle. Olmsted visited the sites of the nearly one hundred parks and boulevards proposed in the plan. His observations have shaped the form and design of the park system Seattle enjoys today. The Olmsted Brothers firm prepared designs for more than twenty individual parks, squares, and boulevards as well. Volunteer Park stands out as one of the most complete and well-preserved example of the firm’s design approach for city parks in Seattle. (Figure 1 - Vicinity Map) Overall, few substantive changes to Volunteer Park have occurred since 1975, the date that the park was listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The most notable alterations since 1975 include a series of changes to the Art Museum forecourt plantings (c. 1990 to present), redesign of the children's play area and replacement of the play equipment (1991), and construction of a new greenhouse in the maintenance area (1991). The park, including the Reservoir and Gate House, retains an overall integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Volunteer Park is remarkably well-preserved a century after its construction. A. Overall Character and Style Volunteer Park is an urban park designed in the naturalistic, pastoral/picturesque American romantic style that is closely associated with the Olmsted firm. The elements of this style include irregular open lawns bordered by shrub and tree plantings, carefully framed and modulated views, one or more circulation loops, and areas intended for crowds and social interaction which are treated in a more geometric and formal manner. The Olmsted Brothers retained Olmsted, Sr.'s belief that people would receive psychological benefits from being surrounded by and contemplating natural scenery. This view was widely- held during the late 19th and early 20th centuries and continues to have adherents. As a result, Olmsted-designed parks emphasize space for non-programmed, passive recreation and flexible activities. Volunteer Park’s open, interconnected lawns and bordering masses of trees express that design philosophy. Like New York’s Central Park, Volunteer Park incorporates a reservoir. It is one of the first two built as part of the City’s Cedar River water supply system. The park also includes the Seattle 5 Volunteer Park Landmark Nomination Asian Art Museum, a Conservatory and related support facilities, a water storage standpipe/observation tower, a bandstand, a shelter house, a play area with wading pool, and tennis courts. The park plays a dual role as a destination park within a citywide park system, and as a neighborhood park in one of Seattle’s most prominent neighborhoods. The plantings reflect this formal and informal character. The extensive variety of non-native plant species and rows of trees emphasize formality while incorporating remnant native trees and clustered informal plantings to define irregular open spaces. While most of the plants are not native, they are arranged in a naturalistic way that makes them appear to belong to a native matrix, but with added variety and color. In the 1903 park system plan, John C. Olmsted proposed that Volunteer Park be the most urban and refined of Seattle’s parks. He recognized that its setting in a fashionable new neighborhood required a character different from more wild and natural parks, such as Ravenna Park and Bailey Peninsula (now Seward Park), in outlying neighborhoods. B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parks and Recreation
    PARKS AND RECREATION Parks and Recreation Overview of Facilities and Programs The Department of Parks and Recreation manages 400 parks and open areas in its approximately 6,200 acres of property throughout the City, works with the public to be good stewards of the park system, and provides safe and welcoming opportunities for the public to play, learn, contemplate, and build community. The park system comprises about 10% of the City’s land area; it includes 485 buildings, 224 parks, 185 athletic fields, 122 children's play areas, 24 community centers, 151 outdoor tennis courts, 22 miles of boulevards, an indoor tennis center, two outdoor and eight indoor swimming pools, four golf courses, studios, boat ramps, moorage, fishing piers, trails, camps, viewpoints and open spaces, a rock climbing site, a conservatory, a classical Japanese garden, and a waterfront aquarium. The development of this system is guided by the Seattle Parks & Recreation Plan 2000, the 38 neighborhood plans, the Joint Athletic Facilities Development Program with the Seattle School District, the 1999 Seattle Center and Community Centers Levy, the 2000 Parks Levy, and DPR’s annual update to the Major Maintenance Plan. 2000 Parks Levy In November 2000, Seattle voters approved a $198.2 million levy lid lift for Parks and Recreation. The levy closely follows the plan forged by the Pro Parks 2000 Citizens Planning Committee. The levy is designed to fund more than 100 projects to improve maintenance and enhance programming of existing parks, including the Woodland Park Zoo; acquire, develop and maintain new neighborhood parks, green spaces, playfields, trails and boulevards; and add out-of-school and senior activities.
    [Show full text]
  • (General Insurance
    8, 1909. 8 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, JANUARY and the defects of NORTHWEST BRIEFS. achievements Scandinavian American Bank. the Brother in Black. In a few A resolution was introduced at Write Today straight-forward, clean-cut re- a copy meeting the city for of the recent of marks, free from partiality or "THE BANK ACCOUNT" council asking Mayor John E. prejudice, he pointed out to his a new, neat little 8-page paper aa full Philadelphia, of good things as an egg is of meat. Reyburn of to send auditors the shortcomings of the MAILED FREE. the Liberty Bell to the Alaska- Negro and deplored the fact there The Scandinavian-American Bank, Yukon-Pacific Exposition. was such a general impulse with Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. d'Oreille River Navi- them to rush to the already over- The Pend E. N. BROOKS & CO. gation Co. has just inaugurated crowded cities where the cost of For Frills For Men. the best river service which the living is the highest and competi- HXQK traveling 1 public has ever enjoyed tion the" greatest. With Booker CLASS HABEBDASEEBT on that river. T. Washington, Mayor Miller 1331 Second Aye., Seattle, Wash. agreed life of the agri- The teachers' institute held in that the culturist is the most independent Spokane is being well attended. • Albert Hansen. existence in the world. He men- Eyes Carefully Examined and Two-thirds of the Columbia riv- tioned the fact that along many Properly Fitted With Glasses er bridge is completed and about lines the Negro had already at- 706 First Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Park and Critical Periods of Development
    Cultural Landscape Report, Treatment, and Management Plan for Branch Brook Park Newark, New Jersey Volume 2: History of the Park and Critical Periods of Development Prepared for: Branch Brook Park Alliance A project of Connection-Newark 744 Broad Street, 31st Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 Essex County Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Affairs 115 Clifton Avenue Newark, New Jersey 07104 Newark, New Jersey Cultural Landscape Report 7 November 2002 Prepared for: Branch Brook Park Alliance A project of Connection-Newark 744 Broad Street, 31st Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 Essex County Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Affairs 115 Clifton Avenue Newark, New Jersey 07104 Prepared by: Rhodeside & Harwell, Incorporated Landscape Architecture & Planning 320 King Street, Suite 202 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 “...there is...a pleasure common, constant and universal to all town parks, and it results from the feeling of relief Professional Planning & Engineering Corporation 24 Commerce Street, Suite 1827, 18th Floor experienced by those entering them, on escaping from the Newark, New Jersey 07102-4054 cramped, confined, and controlling circumstances of the streets of the town; in other words, a sense of enlarged Arleyn Levee 51 Stella Road freedom is to all, at all times, the most certain and the Belmont, Massachusetts 02178 most valuable gratification afforded by the park.” Dr. Charles Beveridge Department of History, The American University - Olmsted, Vaux & Co. 4000 Brandywine Street, NW Landscape Architects Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar River State Water Trail
    A WATER TRAIL GUIDE TO THE CEDAR RIVER Iron Horse Prairie BLOOMING S.N.A. 2 2 24 PRAIRIE 16 20 STEELE CO. DODGE CO. 15 9 FREEBORN CO. MOWER CO. 56 34 218 Cr eek 36 30 WALTHAM 1 1 NEWRY 20 Mud 16 25 1 SARGEANT 105 Creek CEDAR 34 103 57 Deer 218 RIVER MAPLE ISLAND CORNING MAYVILLE 251 Roberts HOLLANDALE 36 25 Cr eek LANSING 20 CORNERS 2 25 2 34 LANSING BROWNSDALE 2 RENOVA 16 30 Hickory Lake 61 Wild Indigo Prairie S.N.A. 36 Ramsey Mill 19 Pond W.M.A. 104 ANDYVILLE 25 Wild Indigo Prairie S.N.A. Carex Ramsey Mill Pond Cr eek W.M.A. Murphy RAMSEY 16 25 218 Creek Moscow Creek Wolf Ramsey Mill Pond 25 Portage (R) 125 Yds Turtle 27 20 J.C. Hormel 56 Nature Center Dobbins 102 Creek 61 34 Austin Mill Pond NICOLVILLE 102 East 90 OAKLAND Schrafel 90 W.M.A. Side 90 HOLLANDALE Lake Mentel 46 46 AUSTIN JUNCTION Portage (L) 250 Yds W.M.A. 218 19 Roosevelt Bridge Creek 90 Driesner Park 15 3 3 30 Orchard 105 Cedar River A.M.A. Rose 28 28 river level development) trail (future gauge Creek Route Description for the Cedar River RIVER NOTE: (R) and (L) represent right and left banks of the river when facing downstream. Cedar River Riverwood Landing A.M.A. 25.0 County Road 2 bridge ROSE River VARCO 4 24-21.6 Ramsey Mill Pond W.M.A. 4 218 CREEK Lyle-Austin W.M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • West Seattle Wayfinding Project: Rolling Community Meeting August 28, 2010
    West Seattle Wayfinding Project: Rolling Community Meeting August 28, 2010 Questions to think about while on the tour: • Is this location appropriate for pedestrian wayfinding purposes? • What are the nearby points of interest? • What should be highlighted about this area? • How well does the potential kiosk location fit in with the surrounding environment? • Is there a linkage between the potential kiosk location and local transit service? • Where in the right-of-way should the kiosk be installed so that it does not impede pedestrian movement? Kiosk Locations Wildwood Place (Kiosk #2) • Location: SW Wildwood Place and 45th Ave SW • Possible installation site on wide right-of-way, northwest corner of intersection Notes: Kiosk installation site has already been finalized and sketched for permitting purposes. 1 Fauntleroy Ferry Terminal (Kiosk #3) • Location: Fauntleroy Way SW near Ferry Terminal • Possible installation site at bottom of stairs, corner of Fauntleroy and SW Director St Notes: Due to construction around ferry terminal, kiosk installation is put on hold indefinitely. Lincoln Park (Kiosk #4) • Location: Fauntleroy Way SW near 47th Ave SW • Possible installation site on Fauntleroy at SW Webster St and 47th Ave SW, on corner of grass patch near Route 54 bus stop Notes: Kiosk installation site has already been finalized and sketched for permitting purposes. 2 Morgan Junction (Kiosk #5) • Location: East side of California Ave SW, north side of Fauntleroy Way SW • Possible installation site on asphalt rectangle near bike rack Notes:
    [Show full text]
  • Frommer's Seattle 2004
    01 541277 FM.qxd 11/17/03 9:37 AM Page i Seattle 2004 by Karl Samson Here’s what the critics say about Frommer’s: “Amazingly easy to use. Very portable, very complete.” —Booklist “Detailed, accurate, and easy-to-read information for all price ranges.” —Glamour Magazine “Hotel information is close to encyclopedic.” —Des Moines Sunday Register “Frommer’s Guides have a way of giving you a real feel for a place.” —Knight Ridder Newspapers 01 541277 FM.qxd 11/17/03 9:37 AM Page ii About the Author Karl Samson makes his home in the Northwest. He also covers the rest of Wash- ington for Frommer’s. In addition, Karl is the author of Frommer’s Arizona. Published by: Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5744 Copyright © 2004 Wiley Publishing, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval sys- tem or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978/750-8400, fax 978/646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for per- mission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, 317/572-3447, fax 317/572-4447, E-Mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal
    Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal October 2017 Alternative Formats Available Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division Submitted by: Timothy Clark, Wendy Eash-Loucks, and Dean Wilson King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank for following people for their contributions to this report: Staff at the King County Environmental Laboratory for field and analytical support. Dawn Duddleson (King County) for her help in completing the literature review. The King County Water Quality and Quantity Group for their insights, especially Sally Abella for her thorough and thoughtful review. Lauran Warner, Frederick Goetz, and Kent Easthouse of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Judy Pickar (project manager), Dean Wilson (science lead), and King County project team members (Bob Bernhard, Mark Buscher, Timothy Clark, Betsy Cooper, Wendy Eash‐Loucks, Elizabeth Gaskill, Martin Grassley, Erica Jacobs, Susan Kaufman‐Una, Lester, Deborah, Kate Macneale, Chris Magan, Bruce Nairn, Sarah Ogier, Erika Peterson, John Phillips, Cathie Scott, Jim Simmonds, Jeff Stern, Dave White, Mary Wohleb, and Olivia Wright). The project’s Science and Technical Review Team members—Virgil Adderley, Mike Brett, Jay Davis, Ken Schiff, and John Stark—for guidance and review of this report. Citation King County. 2017. Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Sockeye Salmon in Lake Washington
    Cedar River Sockeye Past and Present • History of the Watershed and Re-Configuration of the Basin • Baker Lake Sockeye Introductions • Lake Washington Water Quality Clean-Up • Sockeye Adult Returns • Current Limiting Factors for Juvenile and Adult Sockeye • Expectations for Future Returns (WDFW Model) ~17,000 Years Ago Vashon Glaciation Period Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet Waterlines is a project of the Burke Museum. Please visit us to learn more about Seattle’s past landscapes. www.burkemuseum.org/waterlines Captain Burrows Pleasure Resort, 1906 Captain Burrows resort at the mouth of the Black River from 1897 to 1917 [Renton Historical Society note]. Sign in image: Captain Burrows. Summer-Winter Pleasure Resort. Good Fishing-Hunting-Boating . Renton Historical Society collection, UW (648A) • “The only fish in them is a species of trout, very few in number, the largest of which are about a foot in length.” • Hammond 1886, in reference to Lakes Washington and Sammamish. • "A small salmon was said to live permanently in Lake Washington spawning in the creeks which emptied into the lake. The Duwamish of that section were said to prefer this salmon to that which entered the rivers from the Sound.” • Smith (1940), reporting on cultural interviews with local tribal elders. City of Renton created a new waterway in 1912 that diverted the lower Cedar River from the Black River into Lake Washington. (Buerge 1985) The purpose of this 2,000 foot channel was to abate flooding and to provide a “Commercial Waterway” for sea-going vessels after the completion of the ship locks at Ballard.
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ for Non Food Concession 2021.Pdf
    Seattle Parks and Recreation Frequently Asked Questions Non-Food Concessions 2021 Do I Need a Permit for Commercial Use of Park Land? Yes. All commercial activity conducted in a Seattle park site must be permitted through Seattle Parks and Recreation. Vendors applying for a non-food concession permit must provide a service opportunity that complements Seattle Park’s mission of healthy parks, healthy people, and strong communities. Examples of commercial use under the terms of this permit: Stand Up Paddleboard or kayak rentals, henna or face-painting, and bicycle rentals. Concession applications will not be accepted for marketing or promotional activities in City of Seattle parks. Additionally, SPR does not generally permit sales of commercial goods or merchandise at parks unless as part of a special event. How much does it cost to conduct business at Seattle Parks and Recreation? For each park you operate in, there is a $75.00 permit fee. Additionally, there is a monthly concessions fee specific to each park. Leasehold Excise Tax also applies to park concessions. The current WA State Leasehold Excise Tax rate is 12.84% of gross sales. Peak Season Peak Full Memorial Day Season Weekend- May 1- Labor Day September Weekend 30 Pro-Rated Peak Full Season Monthly Fees: Non-Food Vending Season Cost Cost Rates Tier 1-Waterfront Park*, Victor Steinbrueck, Occidental**, $1997 $3000 $600 Peak Westlake** $250 Off-Peak*** $1997 $3000 $600 Peak Tier 2-Alki Beach Park, Adams Boat Launch $100 Off-Peak $999 $1500 $300 Peak Tier 3- Golden Gardens Park, Magnuson Park $100 Off-Peak Tier 4-City Hall Park, Carkeek Park, Delridge Playground, $416 $625 $125 Peak Denny Park, Jefferson Park, Lincoln Park, Lower Woodland $75 Off-Peak Playfield, Madison Beach Park, Mount Baker Beach Park, Pritchard Beach Park, North Acres Park, Seward Park, Volunteer Park, Other *In 2021, Waterfront Park is administered by the Friends of the Waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastlake Bungalows Northgate
    THE EASTLAKE BUNGALOWS NORTHGATE GREENWOOD BALLARD GREEN LAKE THE EASTLAKE BUNGALOWS UNIVERSITY FREMONT DISTRICT WALLINGFORD MAGNOLIA INTERBAY QUEEN ANNE CAPITOL HILL SEATTLE CBD CENTRAL DISTRICT WEST SEATTLE OFFERING The Eastlake Bungalows are situated in Seattle’s beloved Eastlake neighborhood renowned for its striking views of Lake Union, downtown Seattle and Queen Anne. The property itself contains two separate tax parcels, each with two duplexes built in 1990. The properties are being advertised both as an 8-unit sale or as individual fourplexes. The properties consist of (4) 817 SQFT 2x1 flats, (2) 1118 SQFT 2x1.5 townhome units, and (2) 704 SQFT 1x1 townhomes. Each unit conveniently has a full-size washer/dryer set and 7 off-street parking spaces are available off of the alley. The property presents the prospective Buyer with a newer construction value add deal with massive rental upside in one of Seattle’s most popular neighborhoods. The Eastlake Bungalows were designed by renowned architect Charles Edelstein with the vision of creating a houseboat style community steps away from Lake Union. Each unit has a separate entrance with walkways in-between the bungalow like structures. None of the units share a common wall to the sides. NAME The Eastlake Bungalows ADDRESS 2212-2216 Minor Ave E, Seattle, WA 98102 TOTAL UNITS 8 BUILT 1999 SQUARE FEET 6,912 Total Net Rentable PRICE $2,950,000 PRICE PER UNIT $368,750 PRICE PER FOOT $427 CURRENT GRM/CAP 17.7/3.1% MARKET GRM/CAP 13.6/4.6% This information has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable, but we make no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Recreation Greenways Initiative Draft Proposed Capital Improvement Projects
    Greenways Initiative Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board 11/4/15 Photo of 2015 Summer Parkways (courtesy of SDOT) 1 City Department Collaboration Photo of Seattle Parks and Recreation Superintendent Jesús Aguirre (left), Seattle Mayor Ed Murray (center) and Seattle Department of Transportation Director Scott Kubly (right) at 2015 Summer Parkways (courtesy of SDOT) 2 Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR) Greenways Initiative Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Implementation Plan Initiative Description . Develop SPR & SDOT partnership . Enhance and activate connection points from Neighborhood Greenways to Parks . Greenways provide people of all ages and abilities comfortable and attractive places to walk and ride . Funding for the CIP component ($200,000) and the activation and events component ($118,000) begins January 2016 Initiative Objective . Coordinate with SDOT Greenway Implementation Plan and SPR Greenways activation programming . Enhance the impact and connection of all programs and expenditures and leveraging funds from other departments . Improve access and entrances to make parks more welcoming destinations for people of all ages and abilities both walking and bicycling 3 Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR) Greenways Initiative Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Implementation Plan Implementation Plan . SPR and SDOT collaborate to implement capital improvement projects . Capital project prioritization based on the SDOT Bicycle Master Plan and implementation plan o Bicycle Master Plan Goals: safety, connectivity, equity, livability and ridership . Focus on bicycle and pedestrian access improvements to parks adjacent Greenways and other low stress bicycle facilities . Present potential projects to stakeholders to gather ideas, build consensus and leverage funding . Provide an annual report to highlight accomplishments of the program Policy Considerations . Parks Bicycle Policy .
    [Show full text]
  • The Artists' View of Seattle
    WHERE DOES SEATTLE’S CREATIVE COMMUNITY GO FOR INSPIRATION? Allow us to introduce some of our city’s resident artists, who share with you, in their own words, some of their favorite places and why they choose to make Seattle their home. Known as one of the nation’s cultural centers, Seattle has more arts-related businesses and organizations per capita than any other metropolitan area in the United States, according to a recent study by Americans for the Arts. Our city pulses with the creative energies of thousands of artists who call this their home. In this guide, twenty-four painters, sculptors, writers, poets, dancers, photographers, glass artists, musicians, filmmakers, actors and more tell you about their favorite places and experiences. James Turrell’s Light Reign, Henry Art Gallery ©Lara Swimmer 2 3 BYRON AU YONG Composer WOULD YOU SHARE SOME SPECIAL CHILDHOOD MEMORIES ABOUT WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO SEATTLE? GROWING UP IN SEATTLE? I moved into my particular building because it’s across the street from Uptown I performed in musical theater as a kid at a venue in the Seattle Center. I was Espresso. One of the real draws of Seattle for me was the quality of the coffee, I nine years old, and I got paid! I did all kinds of shows, and I also performed with must say. the Civic Light Opera. I was also in the Northwest Boy Choir and we sang this Northwest Medley, and there was a song to Ivar’s restaurant in it. When I was HOW DOES BEING A NON-DRIVER IMPACT YOUR VIEW OF THE CITY? growing up, Ivar’s had spokespeople who were dressed up in clam costumes with My favorite part about walking is that you come across things that you would pass black leggings.
    [Show full text]