DOCSLIB.ORG

Suffolk Green Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suffolk Green Party Cooper, Mark From: John Matthissen Sent: 13 August 2017 21:08 To: reviews Subject: MSDC Green Group submissions re Mid Suffolk DC Attachments: Boundaries Green Version 2.xlsx; Boundaries Green Version 1.xlsx; Boundaries Green Group.docx; Green Map 2.jpg; Green Map 1.jpg Attached are 2 proposals for re‐warding Mid Suffolk DC, presented as spreadsheets and accompanying maps. (The colours have no significance other than to provide clarity.) The commentary sets out many links between parishes across much of the District, and is intended to inform BCE recommendations generally, as well as justifying groupings contained in one or both of our proposals. It should be made clear that we DO NOT support the proposal put forward by Mid Suffolk DC, which is the preference of the controlling political group only. Regards Councillor John Matthissen www.midsuffolk.greenparty.org.uk ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail has been sent using electricity generated from renewable sources 1 Mid Suffolk Boundary Review – Green Group Submissions General approach We have worked on the assumption of 34 councillors while noting that 36 would allow a far better fit for the town of Stowmarket where the Town Council has 4 existing wards and would merit 8 district councillors out of 36. We are very clear that in our predominantly rural area the identities and links between communities are more important than achieving arithmetic equality of representation. We have sought to minimise the need for 2 member wards in rural areas as seeking to combine villages with no commonality then requires the elected members to split workload. This is bad practice. We recognise that there are 3 communities, Needham Market, Elmswell and Thurston where the electorate significantly exceeds the target quota. Alternatives We are submitting two slightly different proposals for the whole District, one our initial scheme and the second following (unsuccessful) work to achieve consensus with the MSDC administration. Eye Ward The town has strong links to Brome which has a “gateway” into Eye as well as industrial development creating employment for the town. Bacton Ward Bacton has strong links with Wyverstone where the community café is supported by many Bacton residents. The two churches have close links via their “friends” organisations, and this proposed ward is also the route that St Edmund took from Hoxne to Bury St Edmunds. For decades Bacton Middle School was sited in Wyverstone Parish and this has become the site for the new Bacton Primary School. Haughley Ward Depending on the scheme that emerges at the next stage of consultation, we would support the preference of Haughley and Wetherden parish councils to remain in the same ward. There are arguments for Haughley joining Old Newton because of the hamlet of Dagworth, which at present is bisected by the current ward pattern. Representation of Dagworth hamlet would then be reunited under a single member. Mendlesham Ward Mendlesham has very close links with Cotton, and although Cotton sits along the same road as Bacton the two villages have had very separate identities for centuries and are separated by a parliamentary boundary (Broad Road). The links from Cotton to Mendlesham are many including the primary schools; almost equal numbers of Cotton children attend Bacton and Mendlesham primaries. Wickham Skeith sees Mendlesham as its main service centre, and is the location of the local shop etc. Wetheringsett also has numerous links to Mendlesham with Mendlesham Airfield located there, and The Memorial to the 38th bomb group, originally sited in Wetheringsett, has been recently relocated to Mendlesham with the blessings of the Wetheringsett community. Onehouse Ward The existing 5 villages of the Onehouse Ward plus the addition of Combs and Little Finborough, would total an electorate a little higher than the ideal range, but there are compelling community reasons why the five villages should remain within the same ward, and for the other 2 parishes to be added. Great Finborough and Buxhall work closely together across the age ranges, from the joint Pre‐school held in Pettiward Hall, the Women’s Institute with meetings held in Buxhall village hall, and the Candlestick Club for senior citizens also meeting in the Buxhall village hall. Most Buxhall children start school at the Finborough Primary. Onehouse, Harleston and Shelland share a community centre, church room (Trinity Hall), and a joint village newsletter known as OHSmag. Some of Shelland’s homes face onto Harleston Green. These villages together with Combs and Little Finborough form a single benefice currently led by Reverend Chris Childs. The secondary school catchment area covers all seven villages with many of the children attending the primary school in Great Finborough. On an historical note, the Finborough Hall estate embraced much of Great and Little Finborough and Onehouse, and this remains visible through the work of the Victorian estate builder James Pollard; Pollard’s work includes school and community buildings and around 3 dozen further dwellings. The 7 villages are bounded by the A14, the Stowmarket town boundary, and the border between Mid Suffolk and Babergh districts; these barriers constrain amalgamation of most of these villages with other communities. The current 5 villages are also well connected by east‐west roads running on either side of the Rattlesden River, the valley of which is designated as a Special Landscape Area. Fressingfield Ward These very rural villages are served by a community shop and some services in the main village, and all look to Harleston (Norfolk) as the local market town. Debenham Ward The villages in this proposed ward are the hinterland of Debenham which is effectively a small market town. Thorndon and Yaxley Ward All these fairly small villages are served by Eye as the market town with most being served by the main A140 road. Palgrave and Wortham Ward A group of villages on the Norfolk border are linked by the A143. Rickinghall Ward 5 villages served by the Rickinghall / Botesdale village centre and linked by the A143. Elmswell Ward (2 members) The existing Elmswell, Norton and Tostock ward can best be enlarged to include Wetherden, while noting this is not the preference of the Wetherden PC. All 4 villages lie to the north of the A14 and smaller villages look towards Elmswell for shops and amenities. When the Wesley Hall in Elmswell was threatened with closure, several Wetherden residents supported the Elmswell parish council to purchase the site so that all the clubs and societies could continue to use the facilities there. Both Tostock and Norton Parish Councils have indicated that they wish to remain in the same ward as Elmswell if possible. Children from Tostock attend Norton Primary School. Woolpit ward. We are opposed to Wetherden being in the same ward as Woolpit which would not really work. The two villages only share a small boundary and to get between the two villages by public right of way one would need to travel along the boundary with Elmswell. Wetherden residents look towards either Elmswell or Haughley for amenities. Woolpit has a very different character to Elmswell and the two villages would not really complement each other if they were combined into a ward. The only thing that combines Woolpit and Elmswell is health provision but the same could be said of the majority of villages in the west of Mid Suffolk District. We understand that Woolpit would like to be in a ward with Drinkstone, but this might prove difficult due to other constraints. Needham/Barking/Bramford wards The villages south from Needham have a variety of links and affiliations, and no scheme can meet all aspirations here. The Green Group number 1 submission logically links Somersham and Little Blakenham which share a community association, and Little Blakenham and Nettlestead which are both members of the Bramford Benefice (along with Baylham and Bramford). Barking, Willisham, Offton are linked with Ringshall and Great Bricett, all of which are connected by the only rural public transport route. However, Baylham is linked with parishes on the other side of the Gipping valley communications corridor. Baylham may have more common cause with Great Blakenham in terms of concerns about development and infrastructure along the B1113 which is the access route for Baylham. The second Green group submission links Baylham with Needham Market where they could have common concerns about the infrastructure around the B1113 as above. Barking has a long association with Needham Market; originally the Barking parish church served Barking cum Darmsden and Needham Market. A bridle way between Barking and Needham Market known as the ‘Causeway' is a corruption of corpse way and was the route taken by funeral processions from Needham. It was last used in 1914……John Fairfax who was Rector of Barking from 1651 until 1663, was removed from his position for refusing to conform with the Act of Uniformity. He served a number of prison sentences and founded the non‐conformist chapel at Needham Market, now the United Reformed Church.’ (http://barking.onesuffolk.net/home/church‐and‐ chapel/ . However, some Barking residents and Barking Parish Council have concerns about growth out from Needham Market changing the rural nature of Barking, and are therefore likely to identify more with other rural parishes than with Needham Market. Both these submissions unfortunately do not embrace the links between Barking, Offton, Willisham and Somersham. Somersham, Offton, Flowton and Willisham are linked in their benefice. Somersham has a community shop used by Somersham and Offton residents. Somersham, Offton, Flowton and Willisham share a community newsletter – ‘The Link’ newsletter. Barking and Somersham both have pre‐schools, Somersham Primary School is linked with Bramford Primary School. Children from Barking attend Somersham Primary School. Stowupland Ward There are strong links between Stowupland, Earl Stonham and Creeting St Peter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agenda for the Convenience of Members of the Public
    Please Contact: Emma Denny Please email: [email protected] Please Direct Dial on: 01263 516010 24th November 2017 A meeting of the Cabinet of North Norfolk District Council will be held in the Council Chamber at the Council Offices, Holt Road, Cromer on Monday 4th December 2017 at 10.00am At the discretion of the Chairman, a short break will be taken after the meeting has been running for approximately one and a half hours Members of the public who wish to ask a question or make a statement item are requested to notify the committee clerk 24 hours in advance of the meeting and arrive at least 15 minutes before the start of the meeting. This is to allow time for the Committee Chair to rearrange the order of items on the agenda for the convenience of members of the public. Further information on the procedure for public speaking can be obtained from Democratic Services, Tel: 01263 516010, Email: [email protected] Anyone attending this meeting may take photographs, film or audio-record the proceedings and report on the meeting. Anyone wishing to do so should inform the Chairman. If you are a member of the public and you wish to speak on an item on the agenda, please be aware that you may be filmed or photographed. Emma Denny Democratic Services Manager To: Mrs S Arnold, Mrs A Claussen-Reynolds, Mr N Dixon, Mr T FitzPatrick, Mr J Lee, Mrs J Oliver, Mr W Northam, Miss B Palmer, Mr R Price, Ms M Prior All other Members of the Council for information.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Development Partnership
    Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk Public Consultation Regulation 25 March 2009 Public Consultation - Regulation 25, March 2009 IMPORTANT NOTE – development of this document In 2007 and early 2008 the Greater Norwich Development Partnership (GNDP) undertook a considerable amount of work to develop a Joint Core Strategy for the area covered by Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk councils, except for the Broads Authority area. This involved a major consultation exercise from November 2007 to February 2008, looking at ‘issues and options’. The document which formed the focus of this work, and the summary leaflet, looked at possible approaches to a wide range of topics including different ways of accommodating the level of new development necessary to meet the requirements of the East of England Plan. This included looking at alternative locations where large scale development might be located in the area close to Norwich. The GNDP intended to produce a ‘preferred option’ for public consultation last summer. However, changes to the plan-making process in June 2008 meant that the preferred option stage was removed. To comply with the new procedures the Partnership carried out a technical consultation with statutory agencies, service providers, organisations that deliver infrastructure, and other key stakeholders in August 2008. It asked them for guidance to develop the ‘content’ of the strategy and asked whether our current approach is one they could support. Technical consultees were asked to consider three options for the distribution of major growth in and around Norwich and on major sites. During autumn 2008 the information provided by technical consultees and further results from evidence studies, were presented to Councillors from the four GNDP councils who agreed to publish the emerging Joint Core Strategy for full public consultation.This consultation document now includes the favoured option for large scale housing growth in and around Norwich, and on major sites (see Appendix 0 on page 59).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Consultation Regulation 25
    Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk Technical Consultation Regulation 25 August 2008 Page 2 of 83 Technical Consultation - Regulation 25, August 2008 IMPORTANT NOTE – development of this document In 2007 and early 2008 the Greater Norwich Development Partnership (GNDP) undertook a considerable amount of work to develop a core strategy for the districts of Broadland Norwich and South Norfolk, except for the area under the jurisdiction of the Broads Authority. This led to a major consultation exercise from November 2007 to February, 2008, looking at ‘issues and options’. The document which formed the focus of this work, and the summary leaflet, looked at possible approaches to a wide range of topics including different ways of accommodating the level of new development necessary to meet the requirements of the East of England Plan. This included looking at alternative locations where large scale development might be located in the area close to Norwich. The intention was that this should lead to the publication of a ‘preferred options’ document in late summer/ autumn 2008. However, in June, 2008, new regulations governing the plan making process came into effect, removing the preferred options stage. Instead, the new regulations require authorities to consult ‘specific’ and ‘general’ bodies (as defined in regulations) on what the ‘content’ of the strategy should be. The regulations also require authorities to consider whether residents and businesses should be included at that stage. The next stage prescribed by the new regulations is the publication of a draft plan for full consultation and submission to the Government Office for the East of England, along with any representations made, for consideration at an independent examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Land Off Burgh Road, Aylsham, Norfolk
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT LAND OFF BURGH ROAD AYLSHAM NORFOLK March 2018 Local Planning Authority: BROADLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Site centred at: NGR TG200265 Author: Chris Harrison BSc MA Approved by: Myk Flitcroft BA MSc MCIfA Report Status: FINAL Issue Date: © CgMs Limited 21 March 2018 No part of this report is to be copied in any way without prior written consent. CgMs Ref: Every effort is made to provide detailed and accurate CH/24244/01 information, however, CgMs Limited cannot be held responsible for errors or inaccuracies within this report. © Ordnance Survey maps reproduced with the sanction of the controller of HM Stationery Office. Licence No: AL 100014723 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Land off Burgh Road, Aylsham, Norfolk CONTENTS Executive summary 1.0 Introduction and Scope of Study 2.0 Planning Background and Development Plan Framework 3.0 Geology and Topography 4.0 Archaeological and Historical Background 5.0 Site Conditions, The Proposed Development and Impact 6.0 Conclusions 7.0 Sources Appendix 1: Gazetteer of HER Data LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1: Site Location Plan Figure 2: Designated Heritage Assets Figure 3: HER Monuments Figure 4: Faden’s Map, 1797 Figure 5: Ordnance Surveyors Drawing, 1816 Figure 6: Aylsham Tithe Map, 1839 Figure 7: Ordnance Survey Map, 1886 Figure 8: Ordnance Survey Map, 1907 Figure 9: Ordnance Survey Map, 1938 Figure 10: Ordnance Survey Map, 1957 Figure 11: LiDAR LIST OF PLATES Plate 1: northern boundary looking south across the Site. Plate 2: from centre-west looking west towards Aylsham Plate 3: from centre-west looking north at nursing home Plate 4: from centre-west looking northeast at depression and new housing development Plate 5: from centre looking north east at depression, A140 services & Bure Valley Farm Plate 6: from centre-north looking east © CgMs Ltd i CH/24244/01 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Land off Burgh Road, Aylsham, Norfolk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This archaeological desk-based assessment considers c.7.9ha of land at Burgh Road, Aylsham, Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft East of England Plan
    East of England Plan Draft revision to the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the East of England East of England Plan Draft revision to the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the East of England December 2004 Organisations involved in producing this document include: Confederation of British Industry, Council for the Protection of Rural England, Countryside Agency, East of England Arts, East of England Development Agency, East of England Regional Assembly, county, district and borough councils, East of England Tourist Board, English Heritage, English Nature, Environment Agency, Health Development Agency, Highways Agency, House Builders Federation, Housing Corporation, Local Economic Partnerships, Strategic Rail Authority, Sustainable Transport for the East of England Region (STEER), waste and aggregate industry. East of England Regional Assembly Flempton House Flempton Bury St Edmunds IP28 6EG Telephone: 01284 729442 Fax: 01284 729447 Email: [email protected] Website: www.eera.gov.uk The Ordnance Survey mapping included within the publication is provided by EERA under licence from Ordnance Survey in order to fulfil its public function as a planning body. Persons viewing this mapping should contact Ordnance Survey copyright for advice where they wish to licence Ordnance Survey mapping for their own use. December 2004. contents Page foreword 2 1 introduction 3 2 background context 5 3 vision and objectives 11 4 core spatial strategy 13 5 sub-regional and sub-area policies 45 6 economic development, retail and tourism 105 7 housing
    [Show full text]
  • Dickleburgh Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Guidelines
    Dickleburgh Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Guidelines December 2017 Working with you, working for you Content Introduction 3 Historical Development 4 Character Assessment 5 Conservation Management Guidelines 13 Appendix 1(i) - Listed Buildings in 15 Dickleburgh Conservation Area Appendix 1(ii) - Unlisted Buildings in 16 Dickleburgh Conservation Area which are of townscape significance Appendix 2 - Policy & Consultation 17 Appendix 3 - Conservation Area Boundary 19 Appendix 4 - Historic Map 20 Appendix 5 - Streetscape 21 Appendix 6 - Natural Character 22 2. Dickleburgh Conservation Area Character Appraisal Introduction The historic settlement of Dickleburgh grew along what was the Pye Roman Road and later became the Norwich to Ipswich turnpike. This accounts for the straightness of Ipswich Road and The Street, and the prevailing historic linear settlement pattern (Norwich Road slightly deviated to the west of the Roman Road line). Since the construction of the bypass in the 1990s the overall character of the village has changed with significant expansion to the east, and this is where the school and the village hall are now located. The most imposing building in the village remains the medieval church and it stands out as a striking landmark. Apart from The Gables and the former Baptist Church, it is the historic grouping of relatively humble cottages and smaller houses along The Street and Norwich Road that mainly forms the character of the area. The tight clustering of properties along The Street to the South of the church are also of interest because of their unusual window arrangements, an indication of former commercial uses. Under the terms of Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, the Local Planning Authority is required to identify areas of special architectural or historic interest whose character or appearance it is desirable to preserve or enhance, and to designate them as a conservation area.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015
    Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015 Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The landscape of Babergh and Mid Suffolk (South and North Suffolk) is acknowledged as being attractive and an important part of why people choose to live and work here. However current pressures for development in the countryside, and the changing agricultural and recreational practices and pressures, are resulting in changes that in some instances have been damaging to the local character and distinctiveness of the landscape. 1.1.1 Some development is necessary within the countryside, in order to promote a sustainable prosperous and vibrant rural economy. However, such development would be counterproductive if it were to harm the quality of the countryside/landscape it is set within and therefore the quality of life benefits, in terms of health and wellbeing that come from a rural landscape in good condition.1 1.1.2 The Council takes the view that there is a need to safeguard the character of both districts countryside by ensuring new development integrates positively with the existing character. Therefore, a Landscape Guidance has been produced to outline the main elements of the existing character and to outline broad principles that all development in the countryside will be required to follow. 1.1.3 Well designed and appropriately located development in the countryside can capture the benefits of sustainable economic development whilst still retaining and enhancing valuable landscape characteristics, which are so important to Babergh and Mid Suffolk. 1.1.4 The protection and enhancement of both districts landscape is essential not only for the intrinsic aesthetic and historic value that supports tourism and the economy for the area but also to maintain the quality of life for the communities that live in the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Stock for Suffolk's Districts and Parishes 2003
    HOUSING STOCK FOR SUFFOLK’S DISTRICTS AND PARISHES 2003-2012 Prepared by Business Development 0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 2 Section 1 – Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 Section 2 – Data ................................................................................................................................ 3 County and District ..................................................................................................................... 3 Babergh ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Forest Heath .................................................................................................................................. 7 Ipswich (and Ipswich Policy Area) ....................................................................................... 8 Mid Suffolk ..................................................................................................................................... 9 St Edmundsbury ........................................................................................................................ 12 Suffolk Coastal ............................................................................................................................ 15 Waveney ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stonham Aspal (Formerly Stonham Antegan)
    1. Parish: Stonham Aspal (formerly Stonham Antegan) Meaning: Meadow/enclosure by/with a stony ground (held by Roger de Aspale (1292)) (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Bosmere (- 1327), Bosmere and Claydon Deanery: Bosmere Union: Bosmere and Claydon RDC/UDC: Bosemere and Claydon R.D. (1894-1934), Gipping R.D. (1934-1974), Mid-Suffolk D.C. (1974 -) Other administrative details: Civil boundary change (1883), 35 acres 33P land, 1 farmhouse and a cottage gained from Mickfield Abolished ecclesiastically (1973) to create Stonham Aspal with Mickfield Bosmere and Claydon Petty Sessional Division Stowmarket County Court District 3. Area: 2,474 acres (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a. Slowly permeable calcareous/non calcareous clay soils, slight risk water erosion b. Some permeable seasonally waterlogged fine loam over clay. 5. Types of farming: 1086 8 acres meadow, wood for 80 pigs, 1 horse, 3 cattle, 36 pigs 1500–1640 Thirsk: Wood-pasture region, mainly pasture, meadow, engaged in rearing and dairying with some wheat, rye, oats, peas, vetches, hops and occasionally hemp 1818 Marshall: Course of crops varies usually including summer fallow as preparation for corn products 1937 Main crops: Wheat, barley, mangold-wurtzel 1969 Trist: More intenswive cereal growing and sugar beet 6. Enclosure: 1 7. Settlement: 1958 Small ribbon type development along Earl Stonham road, Church centrally situated. Secondary settlements at Three Crossways, East End and Mill Green. Few scattered farms. Inhabited houses: 1674 – 66, 1801 – 78, 1851 – 171 1871 – 158, 1901 – 143, 1951 – 154, 1981 – 179 8. Communications: Road: Roads to Mickfield, Earl Stonham, Crowfield and Pettaugh Roman road: Colchester – Caister A140 London – Norwich road 1844 Carrier to Ipswich 1891/1912 Carriers to Ipswich Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday Rail: 1891 5 miles Needham Market station: Ipswich – Bury St.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Suffolk Record Office New Accessions 1 Jan 2016-31 Dec
    1 SUFFOLK RECORD OFFICE NEW ACCESSIONS 1 JAN 2016-31 DEC 2016 This list will also be published at http://www.suffolkarchives.co.uk/collections/recent-additions/ . Please note that if you wish to view any of the recently acquired collections you should contact the appropriate branch before visiting, as not all of these collections have been catalogued and therefore may not be available for public access yet. Bury branch CHEVINGTON SCHOOL: Samples of students’ work and display material, photographs, papers on school closure appeal and a small sample of attendance registers. c1935-1989 ADB527 LONG MELFORD PRIMARY SCHOOL: Governors' minutes 1997-2016 ADB552 CHEDBURGH VCP SCHOOL: Copy photographs of children; originals dated as above. Many images have names of the children pictured. 1958-1988 ADB586 HOWARD MIDDLE SCHOOL, BURY ST EDMUNDS: Photos, letters and newspaper articles 1972-2016; News articles collected by and concerning the school. 20th century ADB736 NEWMARKET ACADEMY: Three boxes of governing body papers, mostly minutes 1996-2014; Three digitised images of school photographs, originally taken in 1955/1957 and 1959; Photocopies of photos from Easter 1959 and 1962 (2pp) and Photocopies of SGS chess record (4pp) 2016 ADB737 HARDWICK MIDDLE SCHOOL, BURY ST EDMUNDS: 4 x admission registers (1976-2002); examples of pupils' work, 8 x scrapbooks of photographs of school events etc 1979-1999 and additional photographs; 4 x scrapbooks of school ‘memories’ 1991-2004; Certificates 1979-2012; Newspaper cuttings 1976-2014, 1976-2014; School history,
    [Show full text]
  • MSDC County Election NOP SOPS
    Suffolk County Council ELECTION OF COUNTY COUNCILLOR FOR THE BOSMERE DIVISION NOTICE OF POLL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT :- 1. A Poll for the Election of a COUNTY COUNCILLOR for the above named County Division will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00am and 10:00pm. 2. The number of COUNTY COUNCILLORS to be elected for the County Division is 1. 3. The names, in alphabetical order and other particulars of the candidates remaining validly nominated and the names of the persons signing the nomination papers are as follows:- SURNAME OTHER NAMES IN HOME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION PERSONS WHO SIGNED THE FULL NOMINATION PAPERS Oxford House 41 Finborough Ruth Coomber, Gregory BRITTON SUZANNE LAURE Labour Party Road Stowmarket IP14 1PS Douglas Edwin Coomber KAY MAXINE 89 Stowmarket Road Needham Conservative Party Richard Alfred Luff, Susan OAKES NADJINA Market Ipswich IP6 8ED Candidate Margaret Burnett 46 Crowley Road Needham Wendy Marchant, Sheila Mary PHILLIPS STEVE Liberal Democrat Market Suffolk IP6 8BJ Norris 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: POLLING POLLING STATION DESCRIPTIONS OF PERSONS DISTRICT ENTITLED TO VOTE THEREAT MBAY Baylham Village Hall Upper Street Baylham IP6 8JR 1.000-227.000 MBDL Needham Market Community Centre Main Hall Community Centre School Street 1.000-69.000 Needham Market IP6 8BB MBRK Barking Village Hall Annexe The Tye Barking IP6 8HP 1.000-337.000 MBTT Battisford Village Hall Straight Road Battisford IP14 2HP 1.000-482.500 MCOM
    [Show full text]
  • Earl Stonham
    1. Parish: Earl Stonham Meaning: Meadow/enclosure by/with a stone or stony ground (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Bosmere ( -1327), Bosmere and Claydon Deanery: Bosmere Union: Bosmere and Claydon RDC/UDC: Bosmere and Claydon RD (1894-1934), Gipping RD (1934-1974), Mid Suffolk DC (1974- ) Other administrative details: Bosmere and Claydon Petty Sessional Division Stowmarket County Court District 3. Area: 2,550 acres (1912) 4. Soils: Slowly permeable calcareous/non calcareous clay soils, slight risk water erosion 5. Types of farming: 1086 Earl Stonham and Little Stonham: 33½ acres meadow, wood for 245 pigs, 1½ acres woodland, 26 cattle, 10 pigs, 256 sheep, 73 goats, part of a mill, 6 cobs. 1500–1640 Thirsk: Wood-pasture region. Mainly pasture, meadow, engaged in rearing and dairying with some pigs keeping, horse breeding and poultry. Crops mainly barley with some wheat, rye, oats, peas, vetches, hops and occasionally hemp. 1818 Marshall: Course of crops varies usually including summer fallow as preparation for corn products 1937 Main crops: Beans, barley, wheat, oats 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6. Enclosure: 1 7. Settlement: 1958 Line of Roman road (Colchester – Caister) crosses eastern sector of parish N-S with some settlement along its length. Well dispersed development clustered at various points: a) the church; b) Broad Green; c) Forward Green; and d) Middlewood Green. Scattered farms. Inhabited houses: 1674 – 56, 1801 – 85, 1851 – 173, 1871 – 163, 1901 – 139, 1951 – 154, 1981 – 174 8. Communications: Road: Roads to Stowupland, Mendlesham, Stonham Aspal, Creeting St. Peter and Creeting St. Mary. 1891 Carrier to Ipswich Tuesday and Saturday Carrier to Stowmarket Thursday 1912 Carrier to Ipswich Tuesday and Saturday Carrier to Stowmarket Thursday Rail: 1891 2½ miles Needham Market station: Ipswich – Bury St.
    [Show full text]