Unbiased Phosphoproteomic Method Identifies the Initial Effects of a Methacrylic Acid Copolymer on Macrophages
Unbiased phosphoproteomic method identifies the initial effects of a methacrylic acid copolymer on macrophages Michael Dean Chamberlaina,1, Laura A. Wellsa,1,2, Alexandra Lisovskya, Hongbo Guob, Ruth Isserlinb, Ilana Talior-Volodarskya, Redouan Mahoua, Andrew Emilib, and Michael V. Seftona,c,3 aInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G9; bDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G9; and cDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G9 Edited by Robert Langer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved July 21, 2015 (received for review May 5, 2015) An unbiased phosphoproteomic method was used to identify the potential to develop “rules of engagement” between cells and biomaterial-associated changes in the phosphorylation patterns of biomaterials. macrophage-like cells. The phosphorylation differences between This study investigated the effects of a methacrylic acid differentiated THP1 (dTHP1) cells treated for 10, 20, or 30 min with (MAA) copolymer on cells because these polymers have been a vascular regenerative methacrylic acid (MAA) copolymer or a shown to promote vascular regenerative responses in vivo (9, 10), control methyl methacrylate (MM) copolymer were determined by but the mechanism behind this response is unknown (11–13). MS. There were 1,470 peptides (corresponding to 729 proteins) Previous studies showed that 45% poly(MAA-co-methyl meth- that were differentially phosphorylated in dTHP1 cells treated acrylate [MM]) copolymer beads promoted vascularization and with the two materials with a greater cellular response to MAA improved wound healing in diabetic mice (10) or with skin grafts treatment.
[Show full text]