DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Full Text

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Full Text The Teaching of the Anatomical Sciences Eur. J. Anat. 18 (3): 219-244 (2014) REVIEW The History of the Teaching of Gross Anatomy - How we got to where we are! Bernard J. Moxham* ,1 and Odile Plaisant 2 1Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, Wales, U.K. and St George’s University, Grenada, West Indies 2Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médicine, URDIA EA4465, Paris, France SUMMARY model and not towards the functionality (health) - based model. Overall, we conclude that the main Evidence primarily from historical considera- focus of attention historically has been the rôle of tions is gathered to compare a variety of approach- dissection. Where in the past religious authorities es to the teaching and learning of gross were foremost in condemning dissection now it is (topographical) human anatomy. The historical academic and postmodernist strictures that deni- approach adopted is not just a chronological ap- grate historical perspectives. proach to the development of pedagogy but is con- ceptually based to underline the changing culture CONTENTS of medicine and the ways in which normal and ab- normal structure and function have been consid- INTRODUCTION ered. Although there is often claimed to be an un- breachable divide between ‘traditionalists’ and ANATOMICAL EDUCATION PRE-RENAISSANCE ‘modernists’ amongst teachers of gross anatomy, (UNTIL c. 1450) and although the method of teaching gross anato- The earliest anatomists my by means of dissection by the students is fre- The eras of Galen and Avicenna quently referred to as the ‘traditional’ method, his- The European Era before the Renaissance torically this method only came into its heyday rel- ANATOMICAL EDUCATION POST- atively recently when legislation permitted a suffi- RENAISSANCE ciency of bodies to dissect and with the advent of The era of Vesalius experiential learning and the development of the The era of William Harvey idea of students achieving competency skills. Par- The development of the medical school adoxically, the so-called ‘modern’ way (e.g. prob- Anatomical museums lem-based learning, computer-based learning) that Anatomical terminologies Art and anatomy and anatomical texts relies more on library/book work and computer simulations harks back to the pre-Renaissance FINAL THOUGHTS AND CONCLUSIONS scholastic approach. Our findings suggest that, as anatomy teaching has moved away from dissec- tion by students, the culture of medicine has be- INTRODUCTION come more inclined towards the disease-based There is a joke that imagines two men driving * Corresponding author: Prof. Bernard J. Moxham. Cardiff their car aimlessly in the countryside. They are lost. Seeing a local farmer, they stop the car and School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales, UK. Tel: +44 (0)29 20874031 ; Fax: +44 (0)29 20875964. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 28 May, 2014. Accepted: 25 June, 2014. 219 History of Anatomy Teaching Fig. 1 (Left). William Hogarth: The Reward of Cruelty ; plate 4 from the suite The Four Stages of Cruelty (1751 CE). Tom Nero, the fictional hero portrayed in Hogarth’s suite of prints, is hung for murder and, as here depicted, he is being anatomized with the noose still around his neck and a dog licking his heart. The prints were intended to be a form of moral instruction, although it was only 1 year after he produced the print that the Murder Act of 1752 in Britain legally permitted public dissection of criminals. The image is clearly a pastiche of the frontispiece of Vesalius’ Fabrica but here the students seem uninterested by the results of the dissection! (Public domain artwork). Fig. 2 (Right). Thomas Rowlandson: The Resurrection Men (1775 CE). A vivid portrayal of the evil trade of body snatching (Burking). (Public domain artwork). ask for directions to London. The farmer replies: Furthermore, since medicine has had a longer “Well, sirs, if I were you I wouldn’t be starting from provenance, with other healthcare professions here!” So, in terms of the teaching of anatomy, (such as dentistry) appearing much later as sepa- where is ‘here’ and how did we get ‘here’? Where rate professions, inevitably much of our focus is on we are in the first decades of the 21st century is anatomy in a medical context. the easy question to answer. For the education of It appears to us that anatomy has had both a healthcare professionals, including anatomical ed- glorious and an inglorious history. Glorious be- ucation, we are in a phase of experimentation. A cause it laid the foundations for all the biomedical variety of educational ideologies abounds and sciences, because it established the scientific and what once was a global acceptance of the im- linguistic basis for medicine and other healthcare portance of anatomy, namely through dissection disciplines, and because it allowed the culture of and a firm grounding in the biomedical sciences at medicine to shift from an overemphasis on disease the start of a healthcare course, no longer applies1. and abnormalities to health and normality. Above How we got ‘here’ is the purpose of this article. In all, its history is glorious because it was an essen- essence, we describe events in an historical con- tial feature of the Renaissance that allowed aca- text and show that the evolutionary path taken until demia to abandon the scholastic approaches reli- the latter part of the 20th century has now given ant on the study of long-established texts and ide- way to a more revolutionary phase. We do not see as so that scientists moved towards observation, it as our business to spend much time asking why experiment and the questioning of prevailing dog- this has happened. That is a question for the read- ma 3. Inglorious because of the way in which anato- er to answer. my historically was used as a punishment for crimi- To pose a further question: what is anatomy? nals (Figure 1), because of the stigma that some The name is derived from both the Greek societies placed upon the invasive nature of the (anatemnein ) and the Latin ( anatomia ), meaning to discipline and its procedures, because of the im- cut up (dissect) parts. In today’s terms, for all moral ways by which bodies were often obtained healthcare studies, anatomy is concerned with the for anatomical examination (e.g. by Resurrection- structure (morphology) of the human body. For the ists) 4 (Figure 2), and because of what was thought purposes of this article, we will give an account of to be a gory anatomical spectacle 5. Most particu- the historical development of the teaching and larly, for the perception amongst many in the learning of only gross (or topographical) anatomy 2. healthcare professions that it is an ‘old-fashioned’ 220 B.J. Moxham and O. Plaisant discipline where everything that needs to be and should be objectively and dispassionately known is known and where it is claimed that its evaluated has disappeared because of political practitioners tenaciously hold on to outmoded edu- necessities (or niceties) or because of a postmod- cational principles 6. We will explore these notions ernist narrative approach that sees equal validity mainly by an historical approach that is partly for any analytical approach and/or takes an overtly chronologically based and partly conceptually social constructivist view. In our opinion, the result based. We will therefore follow the development of is the establishment of educational ideologies that pedagogic philosophies, evaluate the reality be- seem to care little for subject concerns, for student hind the view that there are ‘traditionalist’ and learning, or even patient welfare. The history of ‘modernist’ approaches, and assess the relation- anatomical education exemplifies such processes ship between anatomical research and teaching. and gives concern about the learnèdness, abilities, At this point it is necessary to momentarily di- professionalism, and even safety, of present day gress by considering whether history is, in Henry recipients of medical/healthcare training 11 . As Ford’s terms, bunk! This belief implies that history learning and challenge have been removed, so should be ignored, that novelty is all, and that no has professional competency and, perhaps more lessons are to be learned from the past. One might damaging, the potential respect of the public and also infer that historicism (a progressive direction of society towards the healthcare professions 12 . It for history as espoused by, for example, Hegel and is our belief that anatomy has been at the forefront Marx) is invalid 7. Whatever one’s view, it is clearly in dealing with these changes, this should not sur- the case that medicine and other healthcare pro- prise scholars of history… it was ever thus. fessions have moved from the occupation of, and for, the privileged few to that of, and for, the many ANATOMICAL EDUCATION PRE- and to a point where nowadays the ‘mass’ higher RENAISSANCE (UNTIL CIRCA 1450) 13 education systems present in many countries have had a significant effect on clinical and anatomical The earliest anatomists education 8. This is an issue that needs to be borne ‘The Dark Ages’ and ‘Lost in the mists of time’ in mind as we recount the history of anatomical are expressions often used to describe our poor education. understanding of history prior to the Renaissance. 14 So what are our hypotheses or, more meaning- Not all was ‘dark’ however . We have some ap- fully for the approach we have adopted, from preciation of the history of anatomy, particularly in whence do we, the authors, come? Where are our relation to the growth of anatomical knowledge, but initial biases and prejudices? In answer, we defy we have scant knowledge concerning the early the notion that education shows no progress, there history of the teaching and learning of anatomy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: the Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P
    Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: The Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P. MAHONEY Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) is without doubt one of the most intriguing figures of the Italian Renaissance. It is thus no surprise that he has attracted the attention of many modern scholars. By reason of the varied interests that are reflected in his writings, contrasting interpretations of Pico have been proposed.1 Our purpose here is not to present a new and different picture of Pico but, rather, to offer a contribution to one fruitful area of research pursued by some recent historians of philosophy, namely, Pico's debt to, and 1. For general presentations of Pico's life and thought, see the classic study of Eugenio Garin, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Vita e dottirina (Florence: F. Le Monnier, 1937); Garin's magisterial Storia della filosofia italiana, 2d ed. (Turin: G. Einaudi 1966), 1:458-495. Among more recent general accounts are Pierre-Marie Cordier, Jean Pic de la Mirandole (Paris: Debresse, 1958); Engelbert Monnerjahn, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1960); Paul Oskar Kristeller, Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964), pp. 54-71; Giovanni di Napoli, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola e laproblemaύca dottrinale del suo tempo (Rome: Desclee, 1965); Charles Trinkaus, In Our Image and Likeness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), 2:505-526; and Henri de Lubac, Pic de la Mirandole: Etudes et discussions (Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1974). 165 166 EDWARD P. MAHONEY use of, medieval philosophy in his overall philosophical enterprise.2 Of particular concern will be the influence of Albert the Great on Pico, which can be established by a connection that has apparently not been noticed by Pico's historians.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Lodovico Settala's Aristotelian Problemata Commentary and Late
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archivio istituzionale della ricerca - Università degli Studi di Venezia Ca' Foscari Lodovico Settala’s Aristotelian Problemata Commentary and Late-Renaissance Hippocratic Medicine Craig Martin Key phrases Aristotelian Problemata; Hippocratic Airs, Waters, Places; Renaissance humanism; Lodovico Settala; Girolamo Cardano Abstract Renaissance physicians, influenced by humanism and spurred by their increased knowledge of Hippocratic and Galenic writings, attempted to assimilate these medical works with Aristotelian thought. The similarities between the Aristotelian Problemata and the Hippocratic Airs, Waters, Places allowed Girolamo Cardano and Lodovico Settala, among others, to blur the distinctions between natural philosophical and medical authorities. Philological and historical considerations of these texts as well as judgments about authenticity were colored by the belief that these works were useful for humoral physiology and offered insights into the unity of ancient and modern knowledge. 1 Introduction Late-Renaissance Italian intellectual debate often involved attempts to change or defend the status of particular disciplines. The hierarchy of subjects was frequently a matter for dispute, and leading intellectual figures attempted to raise the status of their particular fields. Just as this was true for mixed mathematics, it was also true for medicine. A number of physicians attempted 1 to promote the status of medicine by defining it as part
    [Show full text]
  • The Maze of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Discovery
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Anatomy Research International Volume 2013, Article ID 596027, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/596027 Review Article The Maze of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Discovery Leszek Herbowski Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology Department, District Hospital, Arkonska´ 4, 71-455 Szczecin, Poland Correspondence should be addressed to Leszek Herbowski; [email protected] Received 13 August 2013; Revised 13 November 2013; Accepted 18 November 2013 Academic Editor: Feng C. Zhou Copyright © 2013 Leszek Herbowski. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The author analyzes a historical, long, and tortuous way to discover the cerebrospinal fluid. At least 35 physicians and anatomists described in the text have laid the fundamentals of recognition of this biological fluid’s presence. On the basis of crucial anatomical, experimental, and clinical works there are four greatest physicians who should be considered as equal cerebrospinal fluid’s discoverers: Egyptian Imhotep, Venetian Nicolo Massa, Italian Domenico Felice Cotugno, and French Franc¸ois Magendie. 1. Introduction As far as Galen’s role in the history of medicine is undoubted, not necessarily all the scientists analyzed his Cerebrospinal fluid (Latin: liquor cerebrospinalis)isaliquid texts literally. It was Irani who referring to the research of occupying subarachnoid space (cavum subarachnoideale)and Torack ascribed the description of the cerebrospinal fluid to brain ventricles (ventricules cerebri)(seeFigure 1). Cere- Galen [8]. Torack, in turn, gave full credit to Galen for the brospinalfluidwasnotreallydiscoveredintermsofits discovery of the choroid plexus as a site of production of liquid state of matter until the early 16th century A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maze of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Discovery
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Anatomy Research International Volume 2013, Article ID 596027, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/596027 Review Article The Maze of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Discovery Leszek Herbowski Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology Department, District Hospital, Arkonska´ 4, 71-455 Szczecin, Poland Correspondence should be addressed to Leszek Herbowski; [email protected] Received 13 August 2013; Revised 13 November 2013; Accepted 18 November 2013 Academic Editor: Feng C. Zhou Copyright © 2013 Leszek Herbowski. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The author analyzes a historical, long, and tortuous way to discover the cerebrospinal fluid. At least 35 physicians and anatomists described in the text have laid the fundamentals of recognition of this biological fluid’s presence. On the basis of crucial anatomical, experimental, and clinical works there are four greatest physicians who should be considered as equal cerebrospinal fluid’s discoverers: Egyptian Imhotep, Venetian Nicolo Massa, Italian Domenico Felice Cotugno, and French Franc¸ois Magendie. 1. Introduction As far as Galen’s role in the history of medicine is undoubted, not necessarily all the scientists analyzed his Cerebrospinal fluid (Latin: liquor cerebrospinalis)isaliquid texts literally. It was Irani who referring to the research of occupying subarachnoid space (cavum subarachnoideale)and Torack ascribed the description of the cerebrospinal fluid to brain ventricles (ventricules cerebri)(seeFigure 1). Cere- Galen [8]. Torack, in turn, gave full credit to Galen for the brospinalfluidwasnotreallydiscoveredintermsofits discovery of the choroid plexus as a site of production of liquid state of matter until the early 16th century A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • De Sphaera of Johannes De Sacrobosco in the Early Modern
    Matteo Valleriani Editor De sphaera of Johannes de Sacrobosco in the Early Modern Period The Authors of the Commentaries De sphaera of Johannes de Sacrobosco in the Early Modern Period Matteo Valleriani Editor De sphaera of Johannes de Sacrobosco in the Early Modern Period The Authors of the Commentaries Editor Matteo Valleriani Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin, Germany Technische Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany University of Tel Aviv Tel Aviv, Israel ISBN 978-3-030-30832-2 ISBN 978-3-030-30833-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30833-9 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuela Bragagnolo Working Paper the Italian Academy for Advanced
    Manuela Bragagnolo Working Paper The Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America - Columbia University Law, Physiognomy and Medicine in Sixteenth-Century Venice: The Case of Giovanni Ingegneri, Bishop of Capodistria († 1600) 10.27.2015 Educated in medicine, Giovanni Ingegneri later became a Venetian jurist who also served as Bishop of Capodistria from 1576 until his death in 1600. An extremely cultivated man, he was the author of two books: a handwritten legal treatise hitherto unknown to modern scholars, entitled Contra la sofistica disciplina de’ giureconsulti (Against the Sophistic Discipline of Jurists), and a treatise on physiognomy, Fisionomia Naturale, which has been referenced in several studies on physiognomy and magic but never studied in its entirety (THORNDYKE, 1941; PORTER, 2005). At the time of Ingegneri’s death, both texts existed in manuscript form only. Fisionomia Naturale was published posthumously and anonymously by Ingegneri’s nephew, Angelo, in 1606. Both treatises testify to an extraordinary and original mind. Even if Ingegneri has, until recently, been overlooked by modern scholars, Lodovico Antonio Muratori, the prominent eighteenth-century Italian historian, evidently grasped the significance of his work. Indeed, some of the most innovative aspects of his own oeuvre build on Ingegneri’s treatises. As I have previously revealed in my own research, Muratori unearthed Ingegneri’s legal manuscripts at Milan’s Biblioteca Ambrosiana, founded by Federico Borromeo, during the period 1695-1700 (BRAGAGNOLO, 2014). During his residency as a “doctor” there, Muratori recorded, in several notebooks, extracts from what appeared to be a “manuscript project” – “un progetto manoscritto” - of Ingegneri’s treatise Contra la sofistica disciplina de’ giureconsulti.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of Anatomy
    BRIEF HISTORY OF ANATOMY (with emphasis on cardiovascular anatomy) Professor Carlos Alberto Mandarim-de-Lacerda, M.D., Ph.D. The University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (www.lmmc.uerj.br) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil November, 2010 -1- The development of anatomy as science extends from the first examinations of victims of sacrifices to the sophisticated analyzes currently done by modern scientists. It is characterized, over time, by the continuous development of the understanding of the structure of the body and the function of the organs. Human Anatomy has a prestigious history and is considered the most prominent of the biological sciences until the 19th century and early 20th century. Methods of study improved dramatically, allowing study from examination through dissection of bodies to the use of technologically complex. Anatomy is one of the foundations of medical education and is taught since at least the end of middle age. The format and amount of information prepared to young doctors have evolved and changed in association with the demands of the medical profession. What is trained today differs significantly from the past, but the methods used to teach have not changed much. For example, the famous public dissections that occurred at the end of middle age and early renaissance can now be considered the 'anatomical demonstrations' used in practical classes. Ancient anatomy Charak born in 300 BCE1 and was a significant contributor to the ancient Indian art and science of Ayurveda2. Charak studied the anatomy of the human body. He described the number of bones as being 360, including the teeth and mistakenly believed that the heart had only one cavity connected to the rest of the body through thirteen channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Aristotelianism OSKAR KRISTELLER, PAUL Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; Proquest Pg
    Renaissance Aristotelianism OSKAR KRISTELLER, PAUL Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; ProQuest pg. 157 Renaissance Aristotelianism Paul Oskar Kristeller HEN we try to understand the historical significance of W Renaissance Aristotelianism, we have to face very great difficulties. The number of its representatives and the variety of their views seems to defy any common description, and this situation is further complicated by the persistent attack to which the school was subjected from different quarters. Moreover, the Aristotel­ ians were in many ways influenced by ideas and methods that origin­ ated outside their own tradition, and on the other hand, most of the avowed opponents of Aristotelianism were more deeply influenced by it than they knew. We must add that Renaissance Aristotelianism has been neglected by most historians and is still unexplored in many of its sectors. Humanism and Platonism have long been considered peculiar to the Renaissance period, and their mediaeval antecedents have but recently received some scholarly attention. Aristotelianism, on the other hand, is so clearly a heritage and continuation of the mediaeval period that most scholars concerned with the Renaissance have tended to treat it as an unimportant residue of the preceding age and have uncritically repeated the charges made against it by its Renaissance opponents, whereas most students of mediaeval philos­ ophy have focused their attention on the twelfth and thirteenth centuries and have tended to sacrifice the supposedly decadent scholasticism of the following centuries to the scorn of its enemies. Thus Renaissance Aristotelianism is a historical phenomenon which we are just beginning to understand in its proper significance.1 The intrinsic importance and historical influence of Aristotle are such an obvious fact that we may be surprised to learn that during the later centuries of classical antiquity his authority and influence were 1 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Touch, Hands, Kiss, Skin: Tactility in Early Modern Europe
    TOUCH, HANDS, KISS, SKIN: TACTILITY IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE Pablo Maurette A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English and Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Jessica Wolfe Reid Barbour Eric Downing Mary Floyd-Wilson Brendan Boyle © 2013 Pablo Maurette ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT PABLO MAURETTE: Touch, Hands, Kiss, Skin: Tactility in Early Modern Europe (Under the direction of Jessica Wolfe) The revaluation of the sense of touch is one of the most revealing intellectual phenomena of the early modern period. After over a millennium of neglect, accorded the last place in the hierarchy of the senses, touch acquires substantive epistemological, aesthetic, ontological, and moral prevalence in early modern discourse. It does so, I argue, to the extent that it becomes one of the foundations of a new cultural paradigm. Whereas the history of the “lower sensorium” has been the object of close attention lately, what has not yet received proper scrutiny are the negotiations between early modern authors and their classical sources that initiated such radical changes in the intellectual mindset of the period. It is only through a comprehensive study of the vindication of touch that we can understand the shift from authority to experience, the new conception of the human body and its place in the universe, and the aesthetic sensibilities that make this period exceptional in its provocative amalgam of literature, philosophy, science and religion. iii To the memory of my grandmother, Rosalía Fernández de Signorini (1913-2003) iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I feel tempted to make sense of the circumstances that brought me to UNC in the fall of 2007 – a convenient succession of opportunities and coincidences – by regarding them as a happy instance of the atomic swerve.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy As Epistemology: the Body of Man and the Body of Medicine in Vesalius and His Ancient Sources (Celsus, Galen)1
    Anatomy as Epistemology: The Body of Man and the Body of Medicine in Vesalius and his Ancient Sources (Celsus, Galen)1 roberto lo presti Humboldt-Universität, Institut für Klassische Philologie Dans la préface au De humani corporis fabrica Vésale dénonce l’absence d’unité du savoir médical comme une des raisons principales de sa décadence. Il décrit les processus sociaux ainsi que culturels qui ont mené la chirurgie à se séparer de la diététique, et cette dernière à se séparer de la pharmacologie, en déterminant une sorte de vide dans l’art médical. Son projet anatomique est donc à considérer dans le cadre d’une plus vaste reconsidération des questions concernant la définition de la médecine, son organisation et division disciplinaire. Cet article vise à éclairer cet aspect “épistémologique’ et méta-anatomique, pour ainsi dire, du projet anatomique de Vésale, en analysant la structure rhétorique de sa polémique contre la fragmentation de la médecine ainsi que les sources anciennes (Galien et Celse) de cette polémique et la manière dans laquelle Vésale se réfère à ses sources et les adapte à ses objectifs et à son horizon méthodologique et théorique. Introduction efining a branch of knowledge as a discipline primarily consists of two Dsteps: 1) saying what that discipline is, what its subject is, what theoretical aims it has, and which methodological strategies it adopts; and 2) establishing its boundaries in exploring and accounting for the fields of human experience. To use the metaphor of the body, we can see that the first step provides the “flesh” (matter) of a discipline, while the second step provides the “skin,” or what distinguishes a bodily (and in this case a disciplinary) unity while connecting it to its context.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Philosophy
    THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO RENAISSANCE PHILOSOPHY EDITED BY JAMES HANKINS Harvard University CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo Cambridge University Press CONTENTS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8Ru, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www .cambridge.org Information on this title: www .cambridge.org/9780 52 r 6089 30 © Cambridge University Press 2007 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without List of figures Vll the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Acknowledgments Vlll First published 2007 Notes on contributors IX Chronology Xll Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge r Introduction A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library JAMES HANKINS I Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data ISBN 978-0-521-84648-6 hardback PART I CONTINUITY AND REVIVAL II ISBN 978-0-521-60893-o paperback 2 The philosopher and Renaissance culture Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for ROBERT BLACK 13 the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, 3 Humanism, scholasticism, and Renaissance philosophy and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. JAMES HANKINS 30
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Edinburgh Research Explorer Edinburgh Research Explorer A Pragmatic Aspect of Polymathy Citation for published version: Henry, J 2016, A Pragmatic Aspect of Polymathy: The Alliance of Mathematics and Medicine in Liddel’s Time. in K Friedrich & PD Omodeo (eds), Duncan Liddel (1561-1613): Networks of Polymathy and the Northern European Renaissance., 4, Scientific and Learned Cultures and Their Institutions, vol. 17, Brill, Leiden. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Duncan Liddel (1561-1613) General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 13. Apr. 2018 A Pragmatic Aspect of Polymathy: The Alliance of Mathematics and Medicine in Liddel’s Time John Henry [to be published in: Karin Friedrich and Pietro Daniel Omodeo (eds), Polymathy in the Northern European Renaissance: Duncan Liddel (1561-1613) in Context (Leiden: Brill, Forthcoming 2015).] In a world where academic study is highly specialized, and high achievement seems to be possible only to those, like Melville’s Captain Ahab, whose “fixed purpose is laid with iron rails”,1 and who pursue the discipline which is their obsessive quarry in a single-minded way, it is easy to regard polymathy as a desirable alternative.
    [Show full text]