New Accountabilities, New Challenges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Accountabilities, New Challenges New Accountabilities, New Challenges New Accountabilities, New Challenges Edited by John Wanna, Evert A. Lindquist and Penelope Marshall Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Wanna, John, author. Title: New accountabilities, new challenges / John Wanna, Evert A. Lindquist and Penelope Marshall. ISBN: 9781925022070 (paperback) 9781925022087 (ebook) Subjects: Government accountability. Politics, Practical. Public administration. Other Authors/Contributors: Lindquist, Evert A., author. Marshall, Penelope, author. Dewey Number: 321.8 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2015 ANU Press Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms . .vii Foreword . ix Contributors . xi 1 . Introduction — Embracing New Accountabilities, Confronting New Challenges: Canvassing options for next generation improvements . 1 John Wanna Part I. Systemic Accountabilities 2 . Restoring Trust in Government . 17 Chris Eccles 3 . Parliamentary Scrutiny of the Australian Public Service . 29 Derek Drinkwater 4 . Assessing Access to Information in Australia: The impact of freedom of information laws on the scrutiny and operation of the Commonwealth government . 79 Daniel Stewart 5 . Through a Glass Darkly: The vicissitudes of budgetary reform in Australia . 159 John Wanna 6 . Constrained Parliamentarism: Australia and New Zealand compared . 189 Harshan Kumarasingham and John Power Part II. Policy Processes 7 . Is Implementation Only About Policy Execution?: Advice for public sector leaders from the literature . 209 Evert Lindquist and John Wanna 8 . National Competition Policy and Cooperative Federalism . 243 Jeffrey Harwood and John Phillimore 9 . The Malfunctions of New Public Management: A case study of governance in Indigenous affairs . 265 Ian Marsh 10. Australian Sub-National Compacts with the Not-For-Profit Sector: Pathways to cross-sector cooperation . 297 John Butcher 11 . Championing Change in a Highly Contested Policy Area: The literacy reforms of David Kemp, 1996–2001 . 343 Wendy Jarvie and Trish Mercer 12 . Cross-Jurisdictional Performance Audits: Impacts and options for the Australian National Audit Office . 369 Patricia Gerald List of Abbreviations and Acronyms AAT Administrative Appeals Tribunal ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics ACCC Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ACER Australian Council for Educational Research ACT Australian Capital Territory ACTU Australian Council of Trade Unions ADJR Act Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) AEU Australian Education Union ALP Australian Labor Party ALRC Australian Law Reform Commission ANAO Australian National Audit Office ANZSOG Australia and New Zealand School of Government APS Australian Public Service APSC Australian Public Service Commission ARC Administrative Review Council CDEP Community Development Employment Project CGovC Compact Governance Committee CGrC Commonwealth Grants Commission CJPA cross-jurisdictional performance audit COAG Council of Australian Governments DEETYA Department of Employent, Education, Training and Youth Affairs DES Department of Education and Science DETYA Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs DEWR Department of Employment and Workplace Relations DHHS Department of Health and Human Services FaCSIA Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs ERC Expenditure Review Committee EU European Union FOI freedom of information FPP first past the post GAO Government Accountability Office GBE Government Business Enterprise GDP gross domestic product GST Goods and Services Tax ICC Indigenous Coordinating Centre ICCS Institute for Citizen-Centred Service vii New Accountabilities, New Challenges IGA intergovernmental agreement IMF International Monetary Fund INTOSAI International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions IPS Information Publication Scheme ITARI integrity, transparency, accountability, responsiveness, and inclusiveness JCPAA Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit LNP Liberal‒National Party MCEETYA Ministerial Council for Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs MFP multifactor productivity MMP mixed member proportional MoU Matter of Urgency MP Member of Parliament MPI Matter of Public Importance MTEF medium-term economic framework MYEFO Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook NAO National Audit Office NBN National Broadband Network NCC National Competition Council NCP National Competition Policy NFP not-for-profit NGO non-governmental organisation NPM new public management NPP National Partnership Payment NSW New South Wales NT Northern Territory NTER Northern Territory Emergency Response OAIC Office of the Australian Information Commissioner OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PBS Portfolio Budget Statement SA South Australia SPP Specific Purpose Payment SAI supreme audit institution WA Western Australia viii Foreword This present collection of essays and research reports by 14 academic commentators and senior practitioners brings together a diverse set of contributors unified in the belief that reform initiatives are imperative for better government and public policy. All these contributions have connections with ANZSOG — the Australia and New Zealand School of Government, established in 2002–03 as an innovative collaboration between the Australian and New Zealand governments and a range of prestigious universities across both countries. Some of the essays were commissioned research papers by experts in the field on topics of multi-jurisdictional concern, others were research papers in which ANZSOG played a role and that were subsequently presented to ANZSOG for publication, and others were first given as keynote speeches at public events hosted by ANZSOG or involving ANZSOG staff members. Of the 14 contributors, eight are academics by profession (at various stages, five have been members of ANZSOG faculty), and six are senior executives with wide-ranging government experience. They each approach their topic with critical engagement, providing constructive suggestions and recommendations for future reform. This title, New Accountabilities, New Challenges, is the latest in the ANU Press/ ANZSOG series which now runs to over 40 titles covering diverse areas of public policy and administration. (ANZSOG also publishes web-based occasional papers, often with jurisdictional partners.) It is the fourth collection of essays ANU Press and ANZSOG have published since the series began in 2006. The first wasA Passion of Policy: Essays in public sector reform (2007), the second Improving Implementation: Organisational change and project management (2007), and the third was Critical Reflections on Australian Public Policy: Selected essays (2009). Each of these previous collections has been well received and consistently attracted high downloads. I am sure that this collection will not disappoint readers, and feel confident that it will surpass the take-up and dissemination accorded to the earlier collections. I commend the volume of essays to our stakeholders and readers and look forward to the debates it will undoubtedly stimulate. Professor John Wanna Sir John Bunting Chair in Public Administration, RSSS, ANU, and National Director of Research, ANZSOG ix Contributors John Wanna holds the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University and is Director of Research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG). Chris Eccles was appointed Secretary of the Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet in December 2014. He previously held the positions of Director General, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet (2011–2014) and Chief Executive, South Australian Department of Premier and Cabinet (2009–2011). Prior to this, he worked in a variety of government and private sector senior management positions. Derek Drinkwater holds a BA with First Class Honours in government from the University of Queensland and a PhD in political science and international relations from The Australian National University. He worked for 20 years in the Department of the Senate and for a decade as a public administration adviser at the Australian Public Service Commission. His publications include Sir Harold Nicolson and International Relations: The practitioner as theorist (Oxford University Press, 2005) and The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate: 1901–1929 (Melbourne University Press, 2000) of which he was assistant editor. He has also contributed to The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Daniel Stewart is a senior lecturer at the ANU College of Law, The Australian National University and a consultant to Sparke Helmore Lawyers. He was a National Undergraduate Scholar and received First Class Honours degrees in economics and law from The Australian National University. He has a Masters in law from the University of Virginia, where he was a John M. Olin Fellow in law and economics. He has practiced as a solicitor, been employed with the Corporate Law Economic Reform Program in the Commonwealth Attorney- General’s
Recommended publications
  • Book 1 Tuesday, 23 December 2014
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL FIFTY-EIGHTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Book 1 Tuesday, 23 December 2014 Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AC, QC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry Premier ......................................................... The Hon. D. M. Andrews, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Education ............................. The Hon. J. A. Merlino, MP Treasurer ....................................................... The Hon. T. H. Pallas, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Employment ............ The Hon. J. Allan, MP Minister for Industry and Minister for Energy and Resources ........... The Hon. L. D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Roads and Road Safety and Minister for Ports ............. The Hon. L. A. Donnellan, MP Minister for Tourism and Major Events, Minister for Sport and Minister for Veterans .................................................. The Hon. J. H. Eren, MP Minister for Housing, Disability and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Equality and Minister for Creative Industries ........... The Hon. M. P. Foley, MP Minister for Emergency Services and Minister for Consumer Affairs, Gaming and Liquor Regulation .................................. The Hon. J. F. Garrett, MP Minister for Health and Minister for Ambulance Services .............. The Hon. J. Hennessy, MP Minister for Training and Skills .................................... The Hon. S. R. Herbert, MLC Minister for Local Government, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Industrial Relations ................................. The Hon. N. M. Hutchins, MP Special Minister of State .......................................... The Hon. G. Jennings, MLC Minister for Families and Children, and Minister for Youth Affairs ...... The Hon. J. Mikakos, MLC Minister for Environment, Climate Change and Water ................. The Hon. L.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory Election 19 August 2020
    Barton Deakin Brief: Northern Territory Election 19 August 2020 Overview The Northern Territory election is scheduled to be held on Saturday 22 August 2020. This election will see the incumbent Labor Party Government led by Michael Gunner seeking to win a second term against the Country Liberal Party Opposition, which lost at the 2016 election. Nearly 40 per cent of Territorians have already cast their vote in pre-polling ahead of the ballot. The ABC’s election analyst Antony Green said that a swing of 3 per cent would deprive the Government of its majority. However, it is not possible to calculate how large the swing against the Government would need to be to prevent a minority government. This Barton Deakin brief provides a snapshot of what to watch in this Territory election on Saturday. Current composition of the Legislative Assembly The Territory has a single Chamber, the Legislative Assembly, which is composed of 25 members. Currently, the Labor Government holds 16 seats (64 per cent), the Country Liberal Party Opposition holds two seats (8 per cent), the Territory Alliance holds three seats (12 per cent), and there are four independents (16 per cent). In late 2018, three members of the Parliamentary Labor Party were dismissed for publicly criticising the Government’s economic management after a report finding that the budget was in “structural deficit”. Former Aboriginal Affairs Minister Ken Vowles, Jeff Collins, and Scott McConnell were dismissed. Mr Vowles later resigned from Parliament and was replaced at a by-election in February 2020 by former Richmond footballer Joel Bowden (Australian Labor Party).
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government / Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis
    AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Ministerial careers and accountability in the Australian Commonwealth government / edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis. ISBN: 9781922144003 (pbk.) 9781922144010 (ebook) Series: ANZSOG series Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Politicians--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Ethical behavior. Political ethics--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Public opinion. Australia--Politics and government. Australia--Politics and government--Public opinion. Other Authors/Contributors: Dowding, Keith M. Lewis, Chris. Dewey Number: 324.220994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents 1. Hiring, Firing, Roles and Responsibilities. 1 Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis 2. Ministers as Ministries and the Logic of their Collective Action . 15 John Wanna 3. Predicting Cabinet Ministers: A psychological approach ..... 35 Michael Dalvean 4. Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial attitudes to party and parliamentary scrutiny ........................... 67 James Walter 5. Ministerial Accountability to Parliament ................ 95 Phil Larkin 6. The Pattern of Forced Exits from the Ministry ........... 115 Keith Dowding, Chris Lewis and Adam Packer 7. Ministers and Scandals .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Questions
    About Parliament - Sheet 22 Parliamentary Questions Parliamentary questions are an important means Questions without Notice used by members of Parliament to ensure the (Question Time) government is accountable for its policies and actions to the Parliament and, through the Parliament, to the Questions without Notice are asked orally by people. Opposition or Government backbench members during Question Time in the House. Question Time is In the parliamentary chambers, questions are used a set part of each sitting day, and occurs in both by members on both sides of the house to ask a houses. minister about matters of concern relating to government policy within the minister’s portfolio. In the Legislative Assembly, ministers are asked Questions may also be asked of a member regarding questions for approximately 45 minutes every sitting any matter connected with the business of the house day starting at 2.00 pm or shortly thereafter. for which the member has charge, and also to a In the Legislative Council, Question Time typically member chairing a committee. takes place for approximately 30 minutes starting at 4.30 pm each sitting day. Questions must conform to the rules or the Standing Orders of each house. The Speaker in the Legislative Question Time is one of the liveliest times in a Assembly and the President in the Legislative Council parliamentary sitting day. Generally all members are may disallow or edit a question that is considered to in attendance in the house at this time, when current not conform to the house’s Standing Orders. issues are raised. For this reason, Question Time attracts media attention, with televised extracts Questions asked of a minister must be brief, must not being regularly used in television news programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Supply 3.31 Australia’S North Has Enormous Gas Reserves Which Could Provide a Cost Effective Domestic Energy Supply.183
    3 Development Proposals Overview 3.1 The Committee has received many proposals for major capital infrastructure developments which would require direct government funding for facilitation. 3.2 This chapter lists these proposals and briefly identifies preconditions needed for them to proceed. The proposals are listed by category, then alphabetically. The projects described in this chapter are priority-listed in Chapter 5. Road Infrastructure Proposals 3.3 Roads are the vital connection for service delivery and the transport of produce between regional towns and centres across the nation. The condition of roads in the North is variable, with many being unsealed, or partially sealed, and subject to seasonal flooding.1 National Highways and Major Arterial Roads Bruce Highway—upgrading for flood mitigation, safety and capacity improvement north and south of Mackay and the provision of a dual carriageway between Edmonton and Gordonvale would sustain major developments north of Cairns and secure access to southern ports during severe weather events.2 Federal funding of $6.7 billion has been allocated 1 Australian Government, Green Paper on Developing Northern Australia, Canberra 2014, p. 33. 2 Mr Andre Wessells, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Regional Development Australia (RDA) Mackay–Isaac–Whitsunday, Committee Hansard, Mackay, 31 March 2014, pp. 1–2; Mr Tim Miles, Chair, Mackay Region Chamber of Commerce, Committee Hansard, Mackay, 31 March 72 PIVOT NORTH for upgrades over 10 years which include $3 billion for north Queensland.3 Central Arnhem Highway—Katherine to Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory—upgrading, with further upgrades of the Stuart Highway, would support community and industry development after the closure of Rio Tinto Alcan’s bauxite refinery in late 2014.4 Great Northern Highway—Pilbara and Kimberley region to Port Hedland, Western Australia—upgrading would improve the Pilbara– Kimberley road network.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION THURSDAY, 20 JUNE 2019 Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable LINDA DESSAU, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable KEN LAY, AO, APM The ministry Premier ........................................................ The Hon. DM Andrews, MP Deputy Premier and Minister for Education ......................... The Hon. JA Merlino, MP Treasurer, Minister for Economic Development and Minister for Industrial Relations ........................................... The Hon. TH Pallas, MP Minister for Transport Infrastructure ............................... The Hon. JM Allan, MP Minister for Crime Prevention, Minister for Corrections, Minister for Youth Justice and Minister for Victim Support .................... The Hon. BA Carroll, MP Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change, and Minister for Solar Homes ................................................. The Hon. L D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Child Protection and Minister for Disability, Ageing and Carers ....................................................... The Hon. LA Donnellan, MP Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Equality and Minister for Creative Industries ............................................ The Hon. MP Foley, MP Attorney-General and Minister for Workplace Safety ................. The Hon. J Hennessy, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Ports and Freight
    [Show full text]
  • Does Question Time Fulfil Its Role of Ensuring Accountability?
    Does Question Time fulfil its role of ensuring accountability? Parameswary Rasiah University of Western Australia Discussion Paper 14/06 (April 2006) Democratic Audit of Australia Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au My argument is that Question Time (i.e. Questions Without Notice) does not fulfill its role of ensuring the government is held accountable for its actions, based on three premises. Firstly, ministers do evade answering questions, specifically those asked by opposition MPs; secondly, the speaker’s inaction or rulings when evasion occurs and thirdly, ‘Dorothy Dixers’ (friendly questions) are widely used by the government to evade accountability. Evasion The popularly held belief that ministers frequently evade answering questions during Question Time is supported by empirical evidence. My study is based on an analytical framework derived from works by others1 in the field of evasion (or equivocation) in political news interviews. It involved the classification of responses as ‘answers’ (direct or indirect), ‘intermediate responses’ (such as not having the information at hand or pointing out incorrect information in the question), and ‘evasions’ based on specific criteria. The data were Hansard transcripts of the House of Representatives’ Questions Without Notice in February 2003 dealing only with questions and responses on the topic of Iraq. This topic was chosen because it was and still is a relevant topic of discussion today especially in terms of whether the Iraqi regime posed a sufficient enough threat to justify military action by Australia the following month (March 2003) as part of the ‘coalition of the willing’. There were 41 such questions which represented approximately one third of all questions on Iraq for the whole of that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: Inquiry Into the Implementation of The
    7 CHAPTER 2 APOLOGIES, REDRESS AND JUDICIAL INQUIRIES 2.1 This chapter considers some of the major issues raised in evidence concerning the implementation of the recommendations of the Forgotten Australians and Lost Innocents reports. These are: • the requirement for the Commonwealth to provided national leadership in ensuring coordinated and comprehensive responses to care leaver issues; • national and State apologies to care leavers; • reparation and redress schemes; and • the need for judicial inquiries and/or a Royal Commission. 2.2 In most cases, both the Lost Innocents and Forgotten Australians reports made specific recommendations going to these issues. However, it is also the case that many of the recommendations in Forgotten Australians applies to care leavers more generally, and should be understood as being potentially relevant to any person who experienced out-of-home care in Australia in the last century, regardless of whether they experienced care in a State, religious or charitable institution; or indeed in some other setting, such as foster care.1 The term 'care leavers' as it is used in the following chapter thus may include, as relevant, former child migrants and members of the stolen generation.2 National leadership role required from the Commonwealth Lost Innocents 2.3 The former Commonwealth government issued its response to the Lost Innocents report on 14 May 2002. In the preamble to its response the government welcomed the report as a 'sensitive, comprehensive and insightful appraisal of child migration schemes and child migrants' experiences in Australia'; and acknowledged that the legacy of the child migration schemes must be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minority Report
    THE MINORITY REPORT Inquiry into the Victorian Government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. INTRODUCTION On 23 April 2020, in the Victorian Parliament during Question Time, the Premier of Victoria, the Hon Daniel Andrews MP, stated confidently: “[The Public Accounts and Estimates Committee] is the pre-eminent committee in our Parliament, and it ought to be given the opportunity to review the performance of the government. I am confident that it will do that without fear or favour.”1 The Andrews Labor Government’s handling of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, in particular the deadly second wave outbreak of infections, has been nothing short of disastrous. It has had dramatic impacts on all Victorians, with the loss of more than 800 lives, hundreds of thousands of jobs, many thousands of businesses and the deprivation of the liberty of millions of Victorians. The Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (PAEC) was given the task of reviewing the Government’s handling of the biggest health, social and economic crisis in generations. In the view of the minority members of the Committee, this was the wrong choice. A committee dominated by Labor Government members and chaired by a Labor Government member, with both a deliberative and a casting vote on all matters, would never deliver the necessary critical examination or accountability necessary in this crisis. Evidence gathered in preparation for this Inquiry showed that Victoria was the only jurisdiction in Australia with a Parliamentary committee reviewing a government response to the pandemic, with a government majority. When fundamental mistakes made by government caused a second wave of COVID-19 that cost 800 Victorian lives, deepened and extended Victoria’s social and economic misery and led to enormous imposts of the liberty of Victorians, a committee dominated by a Labor Government majority was entirely inappropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation of the 1994 Qld Estimates Committees: a Retrospective
    AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP (Queensland Chapter) Operation of the 1994 Qld Estimates Committees: A Retrospective Dr PAUL REYNOLDS Hon WARWICK PARER, Senator Mr ROSS DUNNING (Former Senior Public Servant, Qld Government, and CEO Evans Deakins Industries) 21 NOV 1994 Parliament House Brisbane Reported by Parliamentary Reporting Staff Dr Reynolds: Thank you ladies and gentlemen for your attendance. The Honourable David Hamill is ill and cannot join us. However, he insisted that some of his points should be given to the meeting. I will do that on his behalf. I can begin by observing that Estimates matters have always been vital to the operation of Parliament. The right to tax was central to the crisis in the Constitution in the seventeenth century. The battle between Crown and Parliament which culminated in the Cromwellian Interregnum of 1649 to 1658 was fundamentally about the right to tax and who possessed that right. It was then resolved on the battlefield. The Parliament had the right to tax but upon this the constitutional seal was set in 1688 when, in the Glorious Revolution, William and Mary, as joint monarchs, accepted without let or hindrance Parliament's unchallenged right to tax. It took another 150 years of British parliamentary evolution for this principle to be worked through in all its particulars but, if we take an historical dimension, we can see that the right to tax is the right to govern and the right to govern confers the stamp of legitimacy on Government. It is pertinent for our Constitution that, only once since Federation, namely in 1975, has this principle been called into question.
    [Show full text]
  • Can the Opposition Effectively Ensure Government Accountability in Question Time? an Empirical Study
    Can the Opposition Effectively Ensure Government Accountability in Question Time? An empirical study Parameswary Rasiah* Since Parliament is at the centre of our political system, the Executive (consisting of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Ministers) is accountable to it. Government accountability is achieved through several parliamentary mechanisms including questioning, debates and parliamentary committees of inquiry. Two kinds of questions are permitted to be asked of Ministers; i.e. questions without notice and questions on notice. Questions without notice, asked during Question Time, are oral questions to Ministers who are expected to respond immediately. Questions on notice, on the other hand, are written questions lodged by members of parliament (MPs), which appear in the Notice Paper, to which Ministers respond also in writing. Question Time is the more popular of the two forums and it is well attended by parliamentarians (Sinclair 1982) since it ‘attracts a consistently high degree of media attention’ (Kelly and Harris 2001, p. 2). The practice of asking questions without notice evolved in a rather ‘ad hoc manner’ (Barlin 1997, House of Representatives infosheet 2002). For a long while, the practice of asking questions without notice had no official status and was greatly influenced by practice and convention. It was finally included in the routine business of the House when the House of Representatives formally adopted standing orders permitting such questions in 1950 (Barlin 1997, House of Representatives infosheet 2002). Question Time and Accountability In any society it is fundamental that there be a system of accountability that ‘is supposed to ensure that any government acts in a way broadly approved by the community’ (Hughes, 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Timbuckleyieefa DIRTY POWER BIG COAL's NETWORK of INFLUENCE OVER the COALITION GOVERNMENT CONTENTS
    ICAC investigation: Lobbying, Access and Influence (Op Eclipse) Submission 2 From: Tim Buckley To: Lobbying Subject: THE REGULATION OF LOBBYING, ACCESS AND INFLUENCE IN NSW: A CHANCE TO HAVE YOUR SAY Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 2:01:39 PM Attachments: Mav2019-GPAP-Dirtv-Power-Report.Ddf Good afternoon I am delighted that the NSW ICAC is looking again into the issue of lobbying and undue access by lobbyists representing self-serving, private special interest groups, and the associated lack of transparency. This is most needed when it relates to the private (often private, foreign tax haven based entities with zero transparency or accountability), use of public assets. IEEFA works in the public interest analysis relating to the energy-fmance-climate space, and so we regularly see the impact of the fossil fuel sector in particular as one that thrives on the ability to privatise the gains for utilising one-time use public assets and in doing so, externalising the costs onto the NSW community. This process is constantly repeated. The community costs, be they in relation to air, particulate and carbon pollution, plus the use of public water, and failure to rehabilitate sites post mining, brings a lasting community cost, particularly in the area of public health costs. The cost-benefit analysis presented to the IPC is prepared by the proponent, who has an ability to present biased self-serving analysis that understates the costs and overstates the benefits. To my understanding, the revolving door of regulators, politicians, fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists is corrosive to our democracy, undermining integrity and fairness.
    [Show full text]