DOCSLIB.ORG

Primaries - Texas - PFC Press Releases (1)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Primaries - Texas - PFC Press Releases (1)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R The original documents are located in Box 39, folder “Primaries - Texas - PFC Press Releases (1)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 39 of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library NEWS RELEASE from the President Ford Committee P.O. BOX 15345, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78761 (512) 459-4101 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ' \- I AUSTIN---Senator John Tower will campaign on behalf of the 11 Four-for-Ford11 delegate teams during a non-stop tour into 20 Texas communities starting April 21. Tower, President Ford•s statewide chairman, will be urging Republican primary voters to elect the delegates pledged to Ford who will appear on the . May 1 ballot. A total of 96 delegates - 4 in each of Texas• 24 congressional districts -will be chosen. (Another 4 at-large delegates will be selected by the convention process) . ... 1 am looking forward to visiting with my constituents in behalf of .. The Four for Ford .. delegate team in Congressional districts all over the state, .. Tower said. 11 The President is providing the leadership necessary to make this an even greater country. He has earned our support, and he is, without a doubt, our best chance for victory in November. I will be urging my fellow Texans to join with me in voting for victory by voting for the Four Delegates pledged to President Ford in their respective Congressional Districts ... Tower will carry President Ford•s message into 17 congressional districts. The six-day schedule, which falls during the Congressional recess, includes stops in Wichita Falls, San Angelo, Odessa, Midland, Boerne, Kerrville, New Braunfels, Seguin, Victoria, Port Lavaca, Houston, Bryan, Lufkin, Nacogdoches, Longview, Texarkana, Plano, Sherman, Denton, and Dallas. The Texas Republican will visit many of the local Ford campaign headquarters and volunteer telephone centers. He also will meet with the news media in each city to discuss issues in Texas• first presidential primary. ;~A~,\ :::.!.... i .'-'',1 -m~- d Tl1e President Ford Committee, Rogers C. B. Morton, Chairrnan Robert Mosbacher National F' Ch · • F'.,_-r~ report is filed with the Federal Election Commission and is a~ailable for purchas~ from the ~~~~~el El"",'.nanC, Robe.rt .c. Moot, .Treasurer. A copy of our a ec 1on ommiSSJon, Washmgton, D.C. 20463. Tower's schedule follows: ·. Wednesday. April 21 WICHITA FALLS: 9 a.m. at Orchid Branch Savings & Loan, Community Room SAN ANGELO: 11:45 a.m. at Ford headquarters, 1950 W. Beaugard. ODESSA: 2:45 p.m. at Ford headquarters, 300 N. Jackson. MIDLAND: 4:45 p.m. at Ford headquarters, 115 E. Wall. Thursd~, Apr.i1"22 BOE~~E: 10 a.m. at Antlers Restaurant KERRVILLE: Noon at Holiday Inn NEW BRAUNFELS: 3:00 p.m. at Krause's Restaurant SEGUIN: 7:30 p.m. at home of Mr. & Mrs. Henry Donegan Friday, April 23 VICTORIA: 9:30 a.m. Bank of CoiTIIl'erce, Americana Room PORT LAVACA: 11:15 a.m. at Coastal Bend Savings & Loan Association .HOUSTON: 2:30p.m. News conference at _____ The Albert Pick ~~otor-Hotel9 SW Freeway BRYAN: 4:30 p.m. at Ramada Inn LUFKIN: 7:00 p.m. at Holiday Inn Saturday, April 24 NACOGDOCHES: 10:15 a.m. at Sheraton Crest Hotel LONGVIEW: Noon at Ford headquarters, 1300 Alpine TEXARKANA: 2:45 p.m. at Ford headquarters, Howard Plaza Sunday. April 25 ·PLANO: 1 :00 p.m. at Ford headquarters, 701 15th SHERMAN: 3:00 p.m. at Texoma Savings &Loan of Grayson County DENTON: 5:00 p.m. at 1506 Malone Monday, April 26 DALLAS: 11:00 a.m. Wrap-up news conference at Da 11 as Press Club. ····,. .. ·-.. -30- CONTACT: Bill Keener (512) 459-4101 .. NEWS RELEASE from the President Ford Committee P.O. BOX 15345, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78761 (512) 459-4101 Tom Landry, head coach of the Dallas Cowboys, today endorsed President Ford with the following statement: I've had the opportunity to be acquainted with President Ford since his days in Congress. I've found him the type of man that I can support for President. He has the type of honesty and integrity that I look for in a man and I'm confident that he will represent the American people in a very positive manne.r. To be a winner in football, a team must have this type of moral leadership. I believe the same kind of leader­ ship is necessary for our country. That's why I'm urging all my friends to vote for the President in this important primary election. Trle Pr~s•~en.t For,~ Ccvrrrnittee, ~oc:::ger'S C. B. \torton, Chair-nan, ~Obert 1\lo<;')a<"~C'I", Natton.:.l Finance Chainnan, Robert c. ~oot, Treasurer. A copy of our report 1\ flied u.tth the Feder.a1 . .lectr•)n Com•nt~s1on dnd '"available for purchase fro1n the Federol Etec:t;on Comm15s1on, Wash1ngtun, o.c. 20461. NEWS RELEASE from the President Ford Committee P.O. BOX 15345, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78761 (512) 459-4101 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 1, 1976 CONTACT: Pete Roussel 459-4101 NOTE TO CORRESPONDENTS: For your information. Attached is a letter sent out recently from the Reagan campaign and a letter sent out today from the President Ford Committee. -30- The President Ford Committee, Rogers C. B. Morton, Chairman, Robert Mos~acher, National Finance Chairman, Robert C. Moot, Treasurer. A copy of our report is filed with the Federal Election Cornrnission and is available for purchase frorn the Federal Election Commission, Washington, D.C. 20463. President Ford Committee P.O. BOX 15345. AUS"nN. TEXAS 78761 (5121459-t101 ----------ME M0 R A N D U M TO: Texas Republican Leaders DATE: March 31 , 1976 FROM: Mrs. Beryl Buckley Milburn Campaign Director I want to begin by congratulating Governor Reagan on his fine victory in North Carolina. Those of us who support President Ford can take some consolation in the fact that he won 25 of North Carolina's 54 delegate vqtes, but no one is making any excuses. We lost. Recently our office began receiving inquiries from the news media about a letter which the Co-Chairmen of the Texas Citizens for Reagan had sent to their leaders around the state. This letter made a number of charges against President Ford and his campaign organizations in Texas. We contacted Ron Deere, the Executive Director of Texas Citizens for Reagan, and requested a copy of the letter which we enclose. .. Actions speak louder than words, and I think the actions of the President Ford Committee during the next month in Texas will answer this letter more effectively than anything else. I only ask that each of you make a careful evaluation of the fairness of the charges leveled at the President and draw your own conclusions. We hope you agree that a positive campaign, based on the issues, is what Texas Republicans want in order to determine how they will vote on May 1. We pledge to conduct such a campaign and call on the leaders of Texas Citizens for Reagan to join us. BBM/tm Enclosure "-~..... ~-"' - .. Tlr' l'"sidrnt Ford Commillrr, Howard H. Callawa)', Chairman. Robrrt C. Moot. Trrasurrr. A cnpy of nur Rrportls ~lrd with til' Ff!drrul Elrction Commission and is a•·ailablr for purchase /rum thr Frdrrul Election Commission, WasiJinrton, D.C. 2046J. Texas Citizens For Reagan 2626 Westheimer, Suite 209 Houston, Texas 77098 Phone: 713/526-1590 March 22, 1976 Dear Reagan Campaign Leaders: STATE CO-CHAIRMEN The Texas campaign is about to go -public, and lest there be any Hun. Erne-;r ;\ngdo.Jr ~lid1.1nd misunderstanding, Governor Reagan is determined to win. Besides that, ~fr, \\·'dlum ..;t:tff D.1lh, he's frankly pretty hacked off at some of the tactics employed by the Hnn R,l\ :\ H.1rnlurt other side, at some of the distortions and downright misrepresentations fi:-.IANCE CHAIRMAN of position and fact that have been used to discredit him in order to gain votes for Gerald Ford. EXEct·nn: IJIRECTOR R nn.1ld B Dc.11 REGIO:-.!Al CHAIRMEN 1exas is the key to the Republican nomination. The first of 16 I Jim <~l.i,,l!:llW .1.1>01~\i('\\ primaries in May, a win here will establish the momentum to carry us II R<~~Cn Hill ll\111_1;! into the August convention. It's delegate votes that count, and to Ill ~It' Bnht" I.JuJh,cn h•rtWnrtl; reach that magic figure of 1,130, the Texas quota is only 66 of our 1\' C R Dnllinger .Jr lk.tum•mt 100 delegates! We can do better than that for the Governor ..• and will! \' ~{p; \\:'.Hrcn Hinkk1 Huusrnn \'I :-..tr:- L•uis D,x:hm· S.m Anrumo Governor Reagan has run astonishinqly stronq in those earlier VII B1ll ..;~url1llk ;..t,:\lkn primaries. True, the eastern media, singing in harmony with the Ford \'Ill \'.m f-knn Ardlt'r S.m Ant<>tllol strategists, have succeeded quite well in convincing the casual voter IX Jud~..;L B.uh.tu Culvn \t~<il.md that Ford has won crushing victories.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Richard Russell, the Senate Armed Services Committee & Oversight of America’S Defense, 1955-1968
    BALANCING CONSENSUS, CONSENT, AND COMPETENCE: RICHARD RUSSELL, THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE & OVERSIGHT OF AMERICA’S DEFENSE, 1955-1968 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joshua E. Klimas, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor David Stebenne, Advisor Professor John Guilmartin Advisor Professor James Bartholomew History Graduate Program ABSTRACT This study examines Congress’s role in defense policy-making between 1955 and 1968, with particular focus on the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), its most prominent and influential members, and the evolving defense authorization process. The consensus view holds that, between World War II and the drawdown of the Vietnam War, the defense oversight committees showed acute deference to Defense Department legislative and budget requests. At the same time, they enforced closed oversight procedures that effectively blocked less “pro-defense” members from influencing the policy-making process. Although true at an aggregate level, this understanding is incomplete. It ignores the significant evolution to Armed Services Committee oversight practices that began in the latter half of 1950s, and it fails to adequately explore the motivations of the few members who decisively shaped the process. SASC chairman Richard Russell (D-GA) dominated Senate deliberations on defense policy. Relying only on input from a few key colleagues – particularly his protégé and eventual successor, John Stennis (D-MS) – Russell for the better part of two decades decided almost in isolation how the Senate would act to oversee the nation’s defense.
    [Show full text]
  • D731 B87 1951-08-24 in Itself Has Increased the Amount of Time Needed to Prepare the Paper
    * * * * * * Chest X-Ray Unit Will NAD CRANE DONORS GIVE $375 Paid In July For 269 PINTS BLOOD Beneficial Suggestions Arrive August 30 During a two-day visit of the Ameri­ From August 30 to September 12 a can Red Cross blood collection unit to Once again constructive thinking has mobile chest X-ray unit from Ninth Na­ this station, August 9 and 10, 269 pints paid off for several NAD Crane employ­ val District Headquarters, Great Lakes, of blood were donated by NAD Crane ees in the form of Beneficial Suggest­ will be on the station. The visit of the personnel. This was the second time ion awards. At the July meeting of the unit at this time is in connection with within five months that the bloodmobile Committee on Awards to Civilian Em­ the Navy's periodic chest X-ray program, had been on the Depot. Officials of the ployees, three cash awards totaling a _project of the Navy Medical Depart­ Red Cross were greatly pleased at the $375 were made. In addition, three Cer­ ment's Division of Preventative Medi­ whole-hearted response to the call for tificates of Merit were presented, and cine. The Navy is interested in keeping volunteers, and expressed their appreci­ two letters of thanks were sent to em­ its personnel healthy and on the job. Mo­ ation for the fine cooperation and assist­ ployees whose suggestions were worthy, bile chest X-ray units, such as the one ance which they received from station but not elegible for consideration for which will visit here, aid by detecting personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986
    Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Steven T. Wills June 2012 © 2012 Steven T. Wills. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwtaer Nichols Act of 1986 by STEVEN T. WILLS has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Ingo Traushweizer Assistant Professor of History Howard Dewald Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT WILLS, STEVEN T., M.A., June 2012, History Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 Director of Thesis: Ingo Traushweizer The Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 was the most comprehensive defense reorganization legislation in a generation. It has governed the way the United States has organized, planned, and conducted military operations for the last twenty five years. It passed the Senate and House of Representatives with margins of victory reserved for birthday and holiday resolutions. It is praised throughout the U.S. defense establishment as a universal good. Despite this, it engendered a strong opposition movement organized primarily by Navy Secretary John F. Lehman but also included members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, prominent Senators and Congressman, and President Reagan's Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger. This essay will examine the forty year background of defense reform movements leading to the Goldwater Nichols Act, the fight from 1982 to 1986 by supporters and opponents of the proposed legislation and its twenty-five year legacy that may not be as positive as the claims made by the Department of Defense suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Packwood Oral History About Bob Dole
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu ROBERT J. DOLE ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Interview with Sen. BOB PACKWOOD July 20, 2007 Interviewer Richard Norton Smith Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics 2350 Petefish Drive Lawrence, KS 66045 Phone: (785) 864-4900 Fax: (785) 864-1414 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu Packwood–07-20–07–p. 2 [Sen. Packwood reviewed this transcript for accuracy of names and dates. Because no changes of substance were made, it is an accurate rendition of the original recording.] Smith: But at his insistence, it’s about more than Senator Dole, and, when we’re done, we hope we’ll have a mosaic that will really amount almost to a history of the modern Senate, and, in a still larger sense, of the political process as it has evolved since Bob Dole came to this town in 1961, for better or worse; and that’s a debatable point. Let me begin by something Senator [John W.] Warner said in yesterday’s [Washington] Post. It was interesting; I think he came to the Senate in ’78. Packwood: Yes. Smith: What year did you Packwood: I was elected in ’68; came in ’69. Smith: Okay. He talked aboutit’s interesting. He talked about, in effect, the good old days as he remembered them, when freshmen were seen but not heard, when you waited until your second year to give your maiden speech, and when you had a handler to sort of guide you through the initiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Prior Utilization to Determine Payments for Medicare Enrollees in Health Maintenance Organizations by James Beebe, James Lubitz, and Paul Eggers
    Using prior utilization to determine payments for Medicare enrollees in health maintenance organizations by James Beebe, James Lubitz, and Paul Eggers The Tax Equity AndFiscal Responsibility Act of predict risk. Using statistical simulations, formulas 1982 is expected to make it more attractive for health incorporating prior use performed better for some maintenance organizations (HMO's) to participate in types ofbiased groups than a formula similar to the the Medicare program on an at-risk basis. Currently, one currently employed. Major concerns involve the payments to at-risk HMO's are based on a formula ability to "game the system.» The prior-use model is known as the adjusted average per capita cost now being tested in an HMO demonstration. This (AAPCC). This article describes the current formula article also outlines the limitations ofa prior-use and discusses a modification, based on prior use of model and areas for future research. Medicare services, that endeavors to more accurately Introduction (IPA) type ofHMO's in the studies. Persons may be attracted to IPA's because they can maintain their Health maintenance organizations (HMO's) have present ties to their physicians, and such persons may generally been considered to be more efficient be in poorer than average health (Lull, 1981). Third, systems for providing health care than the traditional in all the studies, only one fee--for-service alternative fee-for-service system. Many studies have found that was offered. A study ofthe Federal Employees health care costs and hospital use in HMO's, Health Benefits Program, where a range offee-for­ particularly in prepaid group practices (PGP), are service and HMO plans are available, did not find generally lower than in the fee-for-service sector selection oflow users into HMO's (Schuttinga, Fallik, (Manning et al., 1984; Wolinsky, 1980; Luft, 1978; and Steinwald, 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • 116Th Congress 15
    ARKANSAS 116th Congress 15 ARKANSAS (Population 2010, 2,915,918) SENATORS JOHN NICHOLS BOOZMAN, Republican, of Rogers, AR; born in Shreveport, LA, Decem- ber 10, 1950; education: Southern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, 1977; also attended University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR; professional: doctor of optometry; business owner; rancher; religion: Southern Baptist; married: Cathy Boozman; children: three daughters; commit- tees: Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; Appropriations; Environment and Public Works; Vet- erans’ Affairs; elected to the U.S. House of Representatives 2001–11; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 2, 2010; reelected to each succeeding Senate term. Office Listings https://boozman.senate.gov https://facebook.com/JohnBoozman twitter: @JohnBoozman 141 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 ...................................................... (202) 224–4843 Chief of Staff.—Toni-Marie Higgins. Deputy Chief of Staff /Counsel.—Susan Olson. Legislative Director.—Mackensie Burt. Communications Director.—Sara Lasure. Scheduler.—Holly Lewis. Senior Communications Advisor.—Patrick Creamer. 106 West Main Street, Suite 104, El Dorado, AR 71730 ........................................................ 870–863–4641 1120 Garrison Avenue, Suite 2B, Fort Smith, AR 72901 ....................................................... 479–573–0189 Constituent Services Director.—Kathy Watson. 300 South Church Street, Suite 400, Jonesboro, AR 72401 .................................................... 870–268–6925 1401 West Capitol
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the US Senate Republican Policy
    03 39-400 Chro 7/8/97 2:34 PM Page ix Chronology TH CONGRESS 79 (1945–1947) Senate Republicans: 38; Democrats: 57 Republican Minority Leader: Wallace H. White, Jr. Republican Policy Committee Chairman: Robert Taft Legislative Reorganization Act proposes creating Policy Committees; House objects Senate Policy Committees established in Legislative Appropriations Act Republicans win majorities in both the Senate and House, 1946 Senate Policy Committee holds first meeting (December 31, 1946) TH CONGRESS Sen.White (R–ME). 80 (1947–1949) Senate Republicans: 51 (gain of 13); Democrats: 45 Republican Majority Leader: Kenneth S. Wherry Republican Policy Committee Chairman: Robert Taft Republican Policy Committee begins keeping a “Record Vote Analysis” of Senate votes Harry Truman reelected President, 1948 ST CONGRESS 81 (1949–1951) Senate Republicans: 42 (loss of 9, loss of majority); Democrats: 54 Republican Minority Leader: Kenneth S. Wherry Republican Policy Committee Chairman: Robert Taft Sen.Vandenberg (R–MI), President Truman, Sen. Connally (D–TX), and Secretary of State Byrnes. Sen.Taft (R–OH). Sen.Wherry (R–NE). ix 03 39-400 Chro 7/8/97 2:34 PM Page x ND CONGRESS 82 (1951–1953) Senate Republicans: 47 (gain of 5); Democrats: 49 Republican Minority Leader: Kenneth S. Wherry Republican Policy Committee Chairman: Robert Taft Kenneth Wherry dies (November 29, 1951); Styles Bridges elected Minority Leader Robert Taft loses the Republican presidential nomination to General Dwight Eisenhower Dwight Eisenhower elected President, Republicans win majorities in Senate and House, 1952 RD CONGRESS 83 (1953–1955) Senate Republicans: 48 (gain of 1); Democrats: 47; Independent: 1 Republican Majority Leader: Robert Taft Republican Policy Committee Chairman: William Knowland Robert Taft dies (July 31, 1953); William Knowland elected Majority Leader Homer Ferguson elected chairman of the Policy Committee TH CONGRESS 84 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • 49-23-Egil Krogh
    Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 49 23 11/20/1970Campaign Memo From Richard McCormack to-. RE: November 13-14 Meeting of the American Association of Political Consultants to Discuss with Campaign Managers the Results of the Recent Elections in Texas, California, New York, Arkansas and Minnesota. 17pgs. Monday, June 04, 2012 Page 1 of 1 DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD [NIXON PROJECT] DOCUMENT DOCUMENT NUMBER TYPE SUBJECTITITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION N-\ to -­ ;~)OC e~ FILE GROUP TITLE V\I Ii 5 F '. SMo ~: FOLDER TITLE'() \' -l. • \ r 0 \ ~ fC o. \ RESTRICTION CODes A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. Na!ional security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual's F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Witndrawn and returned non-historical material. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NA FORM 1421 (4-85) .. ' .._..... .'-~.' .~. '; ~':... '., -. ." Presidential Materials Review Board Review on Contested Documents Collection: Egil Krogh Box Number: 18 Folder: Political Articles [1970] Document Disposition 85 Return Private/Political .. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 20 November 1970 '. MEMORANDUM FROM RICHARD MCCORMACK ;RE: November 13-14 1\1eeting of the American Association of Political Consultants To Discuss with Campaign ~vlanagers the Results of the Recent Elections in Texas, California, New York, Arkansas and Minnesota \ 1.
    [Show full text]
  • June 16-30, 1969
    RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/27/1969 A Appendix “A” 2 List St. Lawrence Seaway and Power 6/27/1969 A Development Seating, p. 2 – Appendix “C” 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/27/1969 A Appendix “D” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-3 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary June 16, 1969 – June 30, 1969 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION *U.S. GPO; 1989-235-084/00024 NA 14021 (4-85) THE WHITE HOUSE PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON'S DAILY DIARY (See Travel Record for Travel Activity) PJ.ACE DAY BEGAi"l DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) JUNE 16, 1969 TIME DA~ rrg F. W H ... f-lOTTSE - WashinQ'ton D. C 8:30 am MONDAY PHONE TIME P=placed R=Received ACTIVITY In Out Lo LD 8 :30 The President went to his office.
    [Show full text]
  • AP® Government and Politics: United States Balance of Power Between Congress and the President
    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AP® Government and Politics: United States Balance of Power Between Congress and the President Special Focus The College Board: Connecting Students to College Success The College Board is a not-for-profit membership association whose mission is to connect students to college success and opportunity. Founded in 1900, the association is composed of more than 5,400 schools, colleges, universities, and other educational organizations. Each year, the College Board serves seven million students and their parents, 23,000 high schools, and 3,500 colleges through major programs and services in college admissions, guidance, assessment, financial aid, enrollment, and teaching and learning. Among its best-known programs are the SAT®, the PSAT/NMSQT®, and the Advanced Placement Program® (AP®). The College Board is committed to the principles of excellence and equity, and that commitment is embodied in all of its programs, services, activities, and concerns. For further information, visit www.collegeboard.com. The College Board acknowledges all the third-party content that has been included in these materials and respects the intellectual property rights of others. If we have incorrectly attributed a source or overlooked a publisher, please contact us. © 2008 The College Board. All rights reserved. College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, AP Vertical Teams, connect to college success, Pre-AP, SAT, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. PSAT/NMSQT is a registered trademark of the College Board and National Merit Scholarship Corporation. All other products and services may be trademarks of their respective owners. Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.com.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 National Healthcare Quality Report
    Tenth Anniversary 2012 NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care www.ahrq.govNational Healthcare Quality Report, 2012 2012 NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 AHRQ Publication No. 13-0002 May 2013 www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/index.html ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The NHQR and NHDR are the products of collaboration among agencies across the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Many individuals guided and contributed to these reports. Without their magnanimous support, the reports would not have been possible. Specifically, we thank: Primary AHRQ Staff: Carolyn Clancy, William Munier, Jeffrey Brady, Ernest Moy, Karen Chaves, William Freeman, and Doreen Bonnett. HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR/NHDR: Girma Alemu (HRSA), Chisara Asomugha (CMS), Hakan Aykan (ASPE), Rachel Ballard-Barbash (NCI), Kirsten Beronio (ASPE), Douglas Boenning (ASPE), Julia Bryan (HRSA), Steven Clauser (NCI), Miya Cain (ACF). Susan Fleck (CMS-NC), Edward Garcia (CMS), Miryam Gerdine (HRSA), Olinda Gonzalez (SAMHSA), Tanya Grandison (HRSA), Kirk Greenway (IHS), Lein Han (CMS), Linda Harlan (NCI), Benjamin Hernandez-Stern (OCR), Rebecca Hines (CDC-NCHS), Edwin Huff (CMS-OA), Meghan Hufstader (ONC), Deloris Hunter (NIH), Memuna Ifedirah (CMS-OCSQ), Cara James (CMS), Kenneth Johnson (OCR), Ruth Katz (ASPE), Richard Klein (CDC- NCHS), Michael Kogan (HRSA), Lisa Koonin
    [Show full text]