DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Supplement to the Annual Report 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Supplement to the Annual Report 1 2020 supplement to the annual report 1 4 2 6 3 5 7 table of contents Overview Upstream Downstream Reference 1 2020 at a glance 11 Highlights 42 Highlights 54 Glossary of energy and financial terms 2 Financial information 15 United States 43 Refining and marketing Additional information 8 Future of energy 21 Other Americas 46 Lubricants 56 24 Africa 47 Additives 27 Middle East 48 Petrochemicals 28 Asia 49 Supply and trading 31 United Kingdom 49 Transportation 32 Australia 50 Operating data 34 Operating data Cover photo: Following the acquisition of Noble Energy, Inc. in October 2020, Chevron holds a 39.66 percent owned and operated interest in the Leviathan gas field in Israel. The company continues to progress efforts to monetize its discovered resources at Leviathan. Inside front cover photos: 1 Angola, 2 COVID-19 Response, 3 Singapore, 4 El Segundo, 5 Kazakhstan, 6 Permian Basin, 7 Leviathan 2020 at a glance financial highlights sales and other operating revenues $94.5 billion net income attributable to chevron corporation $(5.5) billion, $(2.96) per share – diluted return on average capital employed (2.8)% cash flow from operating activities $10.6 billion cash dividends $5.16 per share corporate strategies Upstream Exploration – Added approximately 5 billion barrels of Financial-return objective – Deliver higher returns, lower carbon potentially recoverable oil-equivalent resources. Participated and superior shareholder value in any business environment. in six conventional exploration and appraisal wells. Progressed Enterprise strategies exploratory and appraisal drilling in the U.S. and Mexico deepwater y Deliver results through disciplined operational excellence, Gulf of Mexico, pre-salt Brazil, and shale and tight programs in the capital stewardship and cost efficiency. onshore United States and Argentina. y Grow profits and returns by using our competitive advantages. Portfolio additions – Portfolio growth included 36 exploration y Invest in people to develop and empower a highly competent blocks in various regions in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Egypt, Canada, workforce that delivers superior results the right way. Colombia and Cyprus in 2020 and early 2021. These additions total y Differentiate performance through technology. approximately 5.67 million net exploration acres. y Advance a lower carbon future by lowering carbon intensity, Production – Produced 3.08 million net oil-equivalent barrels per increasing renewables and offsets, and investing in low-carbon day, approximately 1 percent higher than 2019. technologies. Shale and tight resources – Continued development of the Major business strategies company’s significant shale and tight resource position. y Upstream – deliver industry-leading returns while developing y Production in the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico high-value resource opportunities. increased 29 percent over the prior year to 574,000 barrels of y Downstream – be the leading downstream and chemicals company oil-equivalent per day. that delivers on customer needs. y Continued development drilling in the Duvernay Shale in Canada. y Midstream – deliver operational, commercial and technical y Achieved first oil from appraisal campaigns in the El Trapial and expertise to enhance results in upstream and downstream. Narambuena blocks in Argentina. y Added high-quality assets in Colorado’s Denver-Julesburg (DJ) accomplishments Basin with the Noble acquisition. Major projects – Continued progress on the company’s development Corporate projects to deliver future value. Safety and environment – 2020 was one of Chevron’s best years ever y Achieved first production from the Sarta Phase 1A project in the in overall safety and environmental performance, setting new record Kurdistan Region of Iraq. lows for serious injuries, Tier 1 and 2 Loss of Containment (LOC) y Advanced construction of the FGP/WPMP at TCO in Kazakhstan. incidents, and motor vehicle crashes. In addition, Chevron continues y Progressed the St. Malo Stage 4 waterflood and the Jack/St. Malo to lead the industry on Total Recordable Injury performance. multiphase subsea pump projects in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Dividends – Paid $9.7 billion in dividends in 2020, marking the 33rd y Completed drilling of 11 subsea wells for Gorgon Stage 2 project consecutive year of higher annual dividend payouts per share. in Australia. Capital and exploratory expenditures – Invested $13.5 billion in the company’s businesses, including $4 billion (Chevron share) of spending Downstream by affiliates. Announced 2021 projected organic expenditures of Refining and marketing $14 billion, including $4 billion of affiliate expenditures. Spending in y Acquired new Australian retail and marketing assets. 2021 prioritizes investments that are expected to grow long-term y Advanced construction on the alkylation retrofit project at the Salt value and deliver higher returns and lower carbon, including over Lake City Refinery. $300 million for investments to advance a lower-carbon future. Petrochemicals Advancing a lower carbon future – Achieved its 2023 targets early y Progressed GS Caltex’s olefins mixed-feed cracker project at the with cost efficient investments to abate greenhouse gas emissions Yeosu Refinery in South Korea. in its operations. Chevron is setting new targets and expects its y Advanced Chevron Phillips Chemical Company projects to Upstream combined oil and gas intensity to be about 35% lower by develop petrochemical complexes in Qatar and on the United 2028 relative to 2016. States Gulf Coast. Portfolio management – Purchased Noble Energy, Inc. (Noble) in October 2020. Realized $1.9 billion in proceeds from asset divestments and met the divestment target of $5–$10 billion between 2018 –2020. Transformation progress – Chevron’s streamlined organization is in place and is designed to be more efficient and effective than ever. Chevron Corporation 2020 Supplement to the Annual Report 1 financial information Net income (loss) Financial summary At December 31 attributable to Chevron Corporation Millions of dollars 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Billions of dollars Net income (loss) attributable to Chevron Corporation $ (5,543) $ 2,924 $ 14,824 $ 9,195 $ (497) Sales and other operating revenues 94,471 139,865 158,902 134,674 110,215 Cash dividends – common stock 9,651 8,959 8,502 8,132 8,032 Capital and exploratory expenditures 13,499 20,994 20,106 18,821 22,428 Cash flow from operating activities 10,577 27,314 30,618 20,338 12,690 Total cash and cash equivalents 5,596 5,686 9,342 4,813 6,988 Total assets 239,790 237,428 253,863 253,806 260,078 Total debt and finance lease liabilities 44,315 26,973 34,459 38,763 46,126 $( ) Total liabilities 107,064 92,220 98,221 104,487 113,356 Chevron Corporation stockholders’ equity 131,688 144,213 154,554 148,124 145,556 ( ) Share repurchases under approved programs 1,750 4,037 1,750 – – () Financial ratios* At December 31 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Current ratio 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.0 0.9 Interest coverage ratio (8.9) 8.1 23.4 10.7 (2.6) Annual cash dividends Debt ratio 25.2 % 15.8 % 18.2 % 20.7 % 24.1 % Dollars per share Net debt ratio 22.7 % 12.8 % 13.5 % 18.6 % 21.2 % Return on stockholders’ equity (4.0)% 2.0 % 9.8 % 6.3 % (0.3)% Return on total assets (2.3)% 1.2 % 5.8 % 3.6 % (0.2)% $ Cash dividends/net income (payout ratio) (174.1)% 306.4 % 57.4 % 88.4 % (1,616.1)% Cash dividends/cash from operations 91.3 % 32.8 % 27.8 % 40.0 % 63.3 % Total stockholder return (25.7)% 15.2 % (9.8)% 10.5 % 36.4 % * Refer to page 55 for financial ratio definitions. Capital employed at year end At December 31 Millions of dollars 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Chevron Corporation Stockholders’ Equity 131,688 144,213 154,554 148,124 145,556 Plus: Short-term debt 1,548 3,282 5,726 5,192 10,840 Plus: Long-term debt 42,767 23,691 28,733 33,571 35,286 Plus: Noncontrolling interest 1,038 995 1,088 1,195 1,166 Total capital employed 177,041 172,181 190,101 188,082 192,848 Return on average capital employed Percent Capital employed At December 31 Millions of dollars 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Upstream – United States $ 31,497 $ 23,861 $ 29,473 $ 28,918 $ 25,855 – International 112,996 114,341 122,187 126,943 130,900 – Goodwill 4,402 4,463 4,518 4,531 4,581 – Total 148,895 142,665 156,178 160,392 161,336 Downstream – United States 14,169 15,085 14,637 13,543 12,353 – International 10,551 10,816 10,675 11,201 10,758 – Total 24,720 25,901 25,312 24,744 23,111 () All Other 3,426 3,615 8,611 2,946 8,401 Total capital employed $ 177,041 $ 172,181 $ 190,101 $ 188,082 $ 192,848 () () Return on average capital employed Year ended December 31 Millions of dollars 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Net income (loss) attributable to Chevron Corporation (5,543) 2,924 14,824 9,195 (497) Plus: Interest and debt expense (after-tax) 658 761 713 264 168 Plus: Noncontrolling interest (18) (79) 36 74 66 Net income after adjustments (4,903) 3,606 15,573 9,533 (263) Average capital employed 174,611 181,141 189,092 190,465 192,642 Return on average capital employed (2.8)% 2.0 % 8.2 % 5.0 % (0.1)% Chevron Corporation 2020 Supplement to the Annual Report 2 financial information Consolidated statement of income Year ended December 31 Total sales & other operating revenues Millions of dollars 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Billions of dollars Revenues and other income Total sales and other operating revenues1 $ 94,471 $ 139,865 $ 158,902 $ 134,674 $ 110,215 Income (Loss) from equity affiliates (472) 3,968 6,327 4,438 2,661 Other income 693 2,683 1,110 2,610 1,596 Total revenues
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (War) Economy of Angola
    ix Acknowledgements Many persons have contributed to this book through discussions, debate and insight. We would particularly like to express our sincere thanks and appreciation to the members of the Institute for Security Studies who continue to provide inci- sive analysis of the conflicts ravaging the African continent. Our appreciation to the Government of Finland through whose generous funding this publication has been made possible and specifically to Pekka Orpana. We would also like to acknowledge the excellence, professionalism and enthu- siasm of our authors. Christian Dietrich would like to record a word of thanks to Virginia Gamba and Jakkie Potgieter for their kindness following his accident and Jakkie Cilliers would like to express his appreciation for the support and patience of Ulrika Soneson. Finally, we would like to thank Alice Coetzee for her superb editorial assistance. Jakkie Cilliers and Christian Dietrich Pretoria September 2000 x K 14° Brazzaville 18° as 22° 4° CONGO ai 4° Kinshasa ANGOLA DA IN e B ir Kikwit A a DEMOCRATIC C Z K K w REPUBLIC w Cabinda i a l OF THE u n g e o g Nóqui CONGO an Lo Soyo M'banza Congo K w ANGOLA e ZAIRE e Quimbele n g C W id Damba g K br u e a M a s a m a Bembe UÍGE n L i g b u o a N'zeto Bungo a n Dundo e g og Uíge u L e a Ambriz Negage p a U Andrada 8° Cuilo c 8° i a Marimba h de m Lucapa Caxito Dan Camabatela b C L a LUNDA i u o CUANZA Luremo a c b s Luanda O a s m NORTE l NORTE a a Cuango a L G C N'dalatando Quela C u l LUANDA Malanje Lubalo u N o a Lucala l E Dondo i Saurimo Cabo
    [Show full text]
  • NEW YORK ------X CITY of NEW YORK, : : Plaintiff, : No
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------X CITY OF NEW YORK, : : Plaintiff, : No. 18 Civ. 182 (JFK) -against- : : OPINION & ORDER BP P.L.C., CHEVRON CORPORATION, : CONOCOPHILLIPS, : EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, : and ROYAL DUTCH SHELL, PC, : : Defendants. : ---------------------------------X APPEARANCES FOR PLAINTIFF CITY OF NEW YORK: Zachary W. Carter Susan E. Amron Kathleen C. Schmid Margaret C. Holden Noah Kazis CORPORATION COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK Steve W. Berman Matthew F. Pawa Benjamin A. Krass Wesley Kelman HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Christopher A. Seeger Stephen A. Weiss Diogenes P. Kekatos SEEGER WEISS LLP FOR DEFENDANT CHEVRON CORPORATION: Caitlin J. Halligan Andrea E. Neuman Anne Champion Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. William E. Thomson Joshua S. Lipshitz GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Herbert J. Stern Joel M. Silverstein STERN & KILCULLEN, LLC Neal S. Manne Johnny W. Carter Erica Harris Steven Shepard Laranda Walker Kemper Diehl Michael Adamson SUSMAN GODFREY LLP FOR DEFENDANT EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION: Theodore V. Wells, Jr. Daniel J. Toal Jaren Janghorbani PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, LLP M. Randall Oppenheimer Dawn Sestito O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Patrick J. Conlon EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION FOR DEFENDANT CONOCOPHILLIPS: John F. Savarese Jeffrey M. Wintner Ben M. Germana Johnathan Siegel WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ Tracie J. Renfroe Carol M. Wood KING & SPALDING LLP JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: Before the Court is a motion by Defendants Chevron Corporation (“Chevron”), ConocoPhillips, and Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”) (together, the “U.S.-based Defendants”) to dismiss Plaintiff City of New York’s (the “City”) amended complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).
    [Show full text]
  • Chevron Corporation 1995 Annual Report
    Chevron Corporation 1995 Annual Report New Prospects. New Perspectives. CHEVRON CORPORATION 1995 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Chevron at a Glance 1 TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS BUSINESS AREAS OF OPERATION 3 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION Explores for and produces crude oil and Major producing areas include the 4 OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS natural gas in the United States and 24 Gulf of Mexico, California, the Rocky 6 THE CHEVRON WAY other countries. Third-largest U.S. natu- Mountains, Texas, Canada, the North The company’s Mission and ral gas producer. Worldwide net produc- Sea, Australia, Indonesia, Angola, Vision statements tion was more than 1.4 million barrels a Nigeria and Kazakstan. Exploration day of oil and equivalent gas. areas include the above, as well as 7 NEW PROSPECTS. Competitive Advantage: Balanced U.S. frontiers such as Bolivia, Colombia, NEW PERSPECTIVES. and international short- and long-term Congo, Peru, Ireland and Namibia. STRATEGIES FOR THE FUTURE opportunities create high-value portfolio. 10 Build a committed team to accomplish the corporate mission. REFINING Converts crude oil into a variety of Principal U.S. locations are El Segundo 10 Continue exploration and pro- refined products, including motor gaso- and Richmond, Calif.; Pascagoula, duction growth in international line, diesel and aviation fuels, lubri- Miss.; Salt Lake City, Utah; El Paso, areas. cants, asphalt, chemicals and other Texas; and Honolulu, Hawaii. Also re- 14 Generate cash from North products. Chevron is one of the largest fines in Canada, Wales and (through its American exploration and pro- refiners in the United States. Caltex affiliate) Asia, Africa, the Mid- duction operations, while main- Competitive Advantage: Largest supplier dle East, Australia and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report
    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report Partners XxxxContents Introduction 3 Five key findings 5 Key finding 1: Staying within 1.5°C means companies must 6 keep oil and gas in the ground Key finding 2: Smoke and mirrors: companies are deflecting 8 attention from their inaction and ineffective climate strategies Key finding 3: Greatest contributors to climate change show 11 limited recognition of emissions responsibility through targets and planning Key finding 4: Empty promises: companies’ capital 12 expenditure in low-carbon technologies not nearly enough Key finding 5:National oil companies: big emissions, 16 little transparency, virtually no accountability Ranking 19 Module Summaries 25 Module 1: Targets 25 Module 2: Material Investment 28 Module 3: Intangible Investment 31 Module 4: Sold Products 32 Module 5: Management 34 Module 6: Supplier Engagement 37 Module 7: Client Engagement 39 Module 8: Policy Engagement 41 Module 9: Business Model 43 CLIMATE AND ENERGY BENCHMARK IN OIL AND GAS - INSIGHTS REPORT 2 Introduction Our world needs a major decarbonisation and energy transformation to WBA’s Climate and Energy Benchmark measures and ranks the world’s prevent the climate crisis we’re facing and meet the Paris Agreement goal 100 most influential oil and gas companies on their low-carbon transition. of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Without urgent climate action, we will The Oil and Gas Benchmark is the first comprehensive assessment experience more extreme weather events, rising sea levels and immense of companies in the oil and gas sector using the International Energy negative impacts on ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Encore Q2 2007
    Encore News for Chevron Retirees, published by the Chevron Retirees Association. Website: www.chevronretirees.org Second Quarter 2007 Annual business meeting returns to San Contents Francisco 1 Annual business meeting returns to After four consecutive years of traveling to San Francisco "new" sites from coast-to-coast and 1 Encore Benefits Canada, the Chevron Corner by Ken Smith Retirees Association will return once again to the 2 President’s Letter friendly confines of the 3 Robertson returns as San Francisco Bay Area for its annual business keynote speaker meeting. Dates are May 3 3 retirees take a 19-21 and the venue is the 685-room, 11-story historic journey Marriott San Francisco In what has become tradition, Kevin Ryan (left), Host Area Vice President Airport Hotel at 1800 for the 2006 Pittsburgh annual meeting, passes on a model oil derrick to 4 Leadership workshop Sy Yuan who is serving in that role for the 2007 confab in the San Old Bayshore Highway Francisco Bay Area. Similar oil derricks served as table decorations at at annual meeting in Burlingame. Pittsburgh's closing dinner banquet. 4 Helping students, Marriott runs a free 24-hour shuttle service to and from the airport. It operates every teaching seniors 10 minutes from 4:40 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The frequency changes to every 15 minutes from 9:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. and 9:45 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. 5 Mailcall Daily parking fees for those driving to the property are $17 self, $20 valet.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberlites Associated with the Lucapa Structure, Angola
    Kimberlites associated with the Lucapa structure, Angola Sandra Elvira Robles Cruz ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tdx.cat) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tdx.cat) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos. En la utilización o cita de partes de la tesis es obligado indicar el nombre de la persona autora.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Oil Company
    STANDARD OIL A Model Monopoly The Origins of Standard Oil • 1870: John D. Rockefeller and partners incorporate the Standard Oil Co. in Ohio • Soon began a systematic program of acquiring competitors. • By 1873, Standard had eliminated most competition within Ohio (1/3 of total US production), and began to spread into the Northeast. Standard’s Methods Standard employed a variety of cut-throat strategies and tactics to undermine (and eventually acquire) its competitors. These included: • Undercutting prices • Buying oil barrel components • Railroad rebates • Corporate espionage and violence • Technical innovation (use of petroleum in operations) Standard expands • Taking advantage of the financial panic of 1873, Standard was able to consolidate control of refineries in PA and NY • By 1878, Standard controlled 90% of all oil refined in the US. • Soon controlled most US marketing as well. Standard’s Marketing Division - 1886 Vertical Integration • Standard began to expand its control of the oil industry by expanding beyond its traditional refining business into all stages of oil and gas production. • Acquired pipelines, railroad tank cars, terminal facilities and barrel manufacturing factories. The Standard Oil Trust • 1882: An attorney for Standard suggests a new corporate arrangement where the stockholders Standard’s group of companies transferred their shares to a single set of trustees who controlled all of the companies. • In exchange, the stockholders received certificates entitling them to a specified share of the consolidated earnings of the jointly managed companies. The Standard Oil Trust’s advantage • Whereas refineries had earlier tried to control output through informal agreements, incentives to cheat prevented these attempts from succeeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Chevron 2006 Annual Report
    2006 Annual Report LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS 2 EMERGING ENERGY 10 OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS 18 FIVE-YEAR OPERATING SUMMARY 85 THE ENERGY PORTFOLIO: EFFICIENT ENERGY 12 GLOSSARY OF ENERGY FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY 86 CONVENTIONAL ENERGY 6 HUMAN ENERGY 14 AND FINANCIAL TERMS 24 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 0 1 UNCONVENTIONAL ENERGY 8 CHEVRON PERSPECTIVES 16 FINANCIAL REVIEW 25 CORPORATE OFFICERS 102 Demand for energy continues to rise, posing a clear challenge for our industry: how to develop new and better ways to produce, process, use and deliver all forms of energy — from conventional crude oil and natural gas to the emerging sources of the future. At Chevron, we recognize the world needs all the energy we can develop, in every potential form. We’re managing our energy portfolio to deliver that energy — and to create growth and value for our stockholders, our customers, our business partners and the communities where we do business. The energy portfolio CONVENTIONAL UNCONVENTIONAL EMERGING EFFICIENT HUMAN ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY 6 8 10 12 14 TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS 2006 was an exceptional year for our company. We continued to deliver value to our stockholders and to make strategic investments that will drive sustained, superior performance over the long term. We reported record net income of $17.1 billion on sales and other operating revenues of approximately $205 billion. For the year, total stockholder return was 33.8 percent, which was more than double the rate of return delivered by the S&P 500. Return on capital employed was a strong 22.6 percent. We continued to return cash to stock- holders through our stock buyback program, purchasing $5 billion worth of shares in the open market, and we increased our annual dividend for the 19th year in a row.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Surface Runoff Using NRCS Curve Number in Some Areas in Northwest Coast, Egypt
    E3S Web of Conferences 167, 02002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016702002 ICESD 2020 Estimation of surface runoff using NRCS curve number in some areas in northwest coast, Egypt Mohamed E.S1. Abdellatif M.A1. Sameh Kotb Abd-Elmabod2, Khalil M.M.N.3 1 National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences (NARSS), Cairo, Egypt 2 Soil and Water Use Department, Agricultural and Biological Research Division, National Research Centre, Cairo 12622, Egyp 3 Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. Abstract. The sustainable agricultural development in the northwest coast of Egypt suffers constantly from the effects of surface runoff. Moreover, there is an urgent need by decision makers to know the effects of runoff. So the aim of this work is to integrate remote sensing and field data and the natural resource conservation service curve number model (NRCS-CN).using geographic information systems (GIS) for spatial evaluation of surface runoff .CN approach to assessment the effect of patio-temporal variations of different soil types as well as potential climate change impact on surface runoff. DEM was used to describe the effects of slope variables on water retention and surface runoff volumes. In addition the results reflects that the magnitude of surface runoff is associated with CN values using NRCS-CN model . The average of water retention ranging between 2.5 to 3.9m the results illustrated that the highest value of runoff is distinguished around the urban area and its surrounding where it ranged between 138 - 199 mm. The results show an increase in the amount of surface runoff to 199 mm when rainfall increases 200 mm / year.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Analyst Themes of Oil and Gas Earnings
    Quarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earnings Q2 2021 ey.com/oilandgas Overview The recovery of oil and gas commodity markets and underleveraged and begin to return even more improved company performance continued in the cash to shareholders. As companies grapple with second quarter of 2021 with oil demand and OPEC+ low unlevered returns on renewable energy discipline resulting in a steady reduction in investments relative to oil and gas projects, the inventories and an increase in crude oil prices. matter of gearing is likely to re-emerge. Brent crude averaged US$69/bbl in the second On capital spending, analysts were interested in quarter, up 13% from the previous quarter and companies’ response to the improving macro- twice the average a year ago. Henry Hub averaged environment, specifically whether the companies US$2.95/mmBtu, down from US$3.50/mmBtu in were considering mobilizing additional upstream the first quarter as prices normalized after the investment with commodity prices returning to pre- extreme cold, but were up 50% from the beginning COVID-19 levels. Supply chain interruptions, labor to the end of the quarter, a trend that has market shortages and inflation concerns have continued into Q3. International gas markets begun to take center stage in economic news, and strengthened with northern Asia LNG prices oil and gas industry analysts checked for signs of averaging nearly US$10/mmbtu in 2Q21, driven by pricing pressure in the market for materials and strong growth in Chinese power demand, European services upstream and indications of how inventory rebuild and reduced hydroelectric output companies plan to offset the impact.
    [Show full text]
  • COGENERATION PLANT and HYDROGEN PIPELINE Addendum to Decision 2000-30 FORT SASKATCHEWAN AREA Applications No.990464 and 1051618
    ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Calgary Alberta SHELL CANADA LIMITED COGENERATION PLANT AND HYDROGEN PIPELINE Addendum to Decision 2000-30 FORT SASKATCHEWAN AREA Applications No.990464 and 1051618 DECISION 2000-30 The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (Board/EUB) issued Decision 2000-30 (attached) on May 30, 2000, approving the applications. This addendum provides the reasons for the Board’s decisions. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Application 990464 Shell Canada Limited (Shell) applied to the Board, pursuant to Section 9 of the Hydro and Electric Energy Act, for approval to construct and operate a 150 megawatt (MW) natural-gas- fired cogeneration plant on its approved Scotford Upgrader site. This site is adjacent to the Scotford Refinery in Strathcona County, about 14 km north of Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta. The cogeneration plant would include • a natural-gas-fired combustion gas turbine, which would generate 80 MW of electric power, • a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), and • a steam turbine, which would generate about 70 MW of electric power. The applicant described the cogeneration process as follows: • Natural gas would be fired in the combustion turbine to generate about 80 MW of electricity. • Heat would be recovered from the hot combustion turbine exhaust gases in the HRSG, which would produce steam. • The steam would be delivered to the upgrader to help meet its steam requirements. • High-pressure HRSG steam and the excess high-pressure steam from the upgrader process units would be delivered to the steam turbine to produce an additional 70 MW of electricity. 1.2 Application 1051618 Shell also applied, pursuant to Part 4 of the Pipeline Act, for approval to construct and operate approximately 8.7 km of 762 mm outside diameter pipeline to transport hydrogen gas from the existing Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
    [Show full text]