Review of Assessment Procedures for Shale Gas Well Casing Installation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Assessment Procedures for Shale Gas Well Casing Installation Review of assessment procedures for shale gas well casing installation The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned and funded by the Environment Agency. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Horizon House, Ben Fretwell Deanery Road, Bristol, BS1 5AH Tim Haines www.environment-agency.gov.uk Judith Glazier Tony Marsland ISBN: 978-1-84911-289-5 © Environment Agency – October 2012 Dissemination Status: Publicly available All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Keywords: Well casing, hydraulic fracturing, unconventional gas The views and statements expressed in this report are those of the author alone. The views or statements Research Contractor: expressed in this publication do not necessarily AMEC Environment and Infrastructure Limited represent the views of the Environment Agency and the Canon Court Environment Agency cannot accept any responsibility for Abbey Foregate such views or statements. Shrewsbury SY2 5DE Further copies of this report are available from our 01743 342000 publications catalogue: http://publications.environment- agency.gov.uk or our National Customer Contact Environment Agency’s Project Manager: Centre: T: 08708 506506 Ian Davey, Environment and Business Directorate E: [email protected]. Product code: LIT 7311 ii Review of assessment procedures for oil and gas well casing installation Evidence at the Environment Agency Evidence underpins the work of the Environment Agency. It provides an up-to-date understanding of the world about us, helps us to develop tools and techniques to monitor and manage our environment as efficiently and effectively as possible. It also helps us to understand how the environment is changing and to identify what the future pressures may be. The work of the Environment Agency’s Evidence Directorate is a key ingredient in the partnership between research, guidance and operations that enables the Environment Agency to protect and restore our environment. The Research & Innovation programme focuses on four main areas of activity: • Setting the agenda, by providing the evidence for decisions; • Maintaining scientific credibility, by ensuring that our programmes and projects are fit for purpose and executed according to international standards; • Carrying out research, either by contracting it out to research organisations and consultancies or by doing it ourselves; • Delivering information, advice, tools and techniques, by making appropriate products available. Miranda Kavanagh Director of Evidence Review of assessment procedures for oil and gas well casing installation iii Executive Summary This report presents information on the assessment procedures for well casing installations used in the exploration and development particularly in regard to shale gas. This information was obtained by reviewing practices for protecting groundwater when installing, developing, maintaining and decommissioning onshore shale gas exploration and production wells. The aim of the project was to inform Environment Agency staff of current practices in this field. The shale gas industry is most developed in the USA with currently more limited exploration in Europe. In the UK, exploration to date has focused on the Sabden and Bowland shales of NW England, which lie 1600–2800 metres below ground. Other types of unconventional resources include coal bed methane and underground coal gasification. The exploration and production of unconventional gases is based on techniques developed by the conventional oil and gas industry. Drilling of deep onshore wells for oil and gas is not new to the UK but there are differences in the way that the techniques are applied. The main differences are that unconventional gas exploitation requires a larger number of closely spaced wells, which are normally extended by horizontal or directional drilling. More use is also made of hydraulic fracturing The gas-bearing shale formation is hydraulically fractured by injection of fluid under pressure to break it up and release gas via the well. A proppant, typically sand, is added to the fluid to hold the fractures open. Chemicals may be added to the fluid to help the hydraulic fracturing process. The well is cased using steel pipe cemented into the borehole as it is drilled. This: • permits control of pressure; • prevents the formation from caving into the well; • prevents flow between formations and isolates them; • provides a means of preventing the entry of formation fluids into the well; • provides a means to install downhole equipment; • provides protection to any groundwater that the well passes through. Wells are plugged and abandoned when they no longer provide beneficial use. The exploration and development of onshore unconventional gases requires a Petroleum Exploration and Development licence (PEDL) from the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and further consents to drill exploration boreholes and to develop a field. Drilling and production are also regulated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) under The Offshore Installations and Wells (Design and Construction, etc.) Regulations 1996 and The Borehole Sites and Operations Regulations 1995, to minimise risks to workers and others. Planning consent is required from the Minerals Planning Authority (MPA). Risks to groundwater The geological formations in which hydrocarbons are present are generally very deep and at some distance vertically below formations containing good quality groundwater, frequently used to provide water supplies. The vertical separation between unconventional gas host rocks and aquifers, combined with appropriate borehole construction, should mean that risks to this groundwater are low. However, boreholes iv Review of assessment procedures for oil and gas well casing installation drilled through aquifers may provide a pathway for movement of pollutants and therefore need to be constructed to a high standard. There is the potential to pollute groundwater with drilling muds, cements, hydraulic fracture fluid, hydrocarbons and deeper formation water as a result of: • spills and leaks of liquids stored at the surface; • leakage into aquifers of fracturing fluids and drilling muds from exploration and production boreholes; • leakage into aquifers via natural discontinuities (joints and fractures) as a result of the introduction of fluids under high pressure; • leakage into aquifers via induced discontinuities as a result of the high- pressure injection of fracturing fluids; • well failure due to poor construction or loss of well control, with the potential for the damaging release of fluids; • borehole or well damage as a result of induced seismicity from the high pressure fracturing operations; • interference between closely spaced wells or abandoned water wells, mine shafts and so on. Good practice This review has found that the following is considered currently to be good practice: • The well should be designed to protect groundwater, particularly through the design and placement of casing. • Good use should be made of modelling to aid the well design and the design of hydraulic fracturing. • The well should be drilled carefully to ensure that drilling fluids do not invade the formations, to avoid flow into the well during drilling and to create a wellbore of known dimensions. • The wellbore should be conditioned (that is, cleaned to remove contaminants by circulating fresh drilling fluid) before casing installation. • Casing must be installed in stages, with casing strings of decreasing diameter installed inside each other as the well is drilled to greater depths. • Casing should be cemented in place. Cement should fill the annulus of surface casing and must prevent movement of fluids and gases from permeable formations at all depths. • The quality of cementing should be demonstrated by pressure testing and supplemented, where necessary by geophysical methods. • Real-time monitoring should be undertaken during drilling, cementing and hydraulic fracturing to allow response to adverse effects. • The well should be pressure tested before hydraulic fracturing and periodically to demonstrate well integrity. • Well abandonment (that is, the activities involved in decommissioning) should be undertaken to ensure that all hydrocarbon bearing formations are separated from the surface by at least two permanent plugs; and Review of assessment procedures for oil and gas well casing installation v • Flowing horizons should be isolated from other permeable and porous formations to prevent cross flow between them after abandonment. vi Review of assessment procedures for oil and gas well casing installation Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Structure of the report 2 1.4 Sources and applicability of data 3 1.5 Glossary of terms 3 2 Drilling operations overview 4 2.1 Unconventional gases 4 2.2 Stages and programme 4 3 Risks to groundwater 15 3.1 Overview 15 3.2 Groundwater protection 16 3.3 Hazards to groundwater 18 3.4 Pathways 26 4 Licensing and regulation
Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Well Integrity Rev 0, 04 December 2012
    An Introduction to Well Integrity Rev 0, 04 December 2012 0 Preface This document has been prepared as a joint project between members of the Norwegian Oil and Gas Association's Well Integrity Forum (WIF) and professors at NTNU and UiS. The intention with the document is to provide a document that can be used in educating personnel in well integrity and especially students at the universities. Authors of this document have been: Hans-Emil Bensnes Torbergsen, Eni Norge Hilde Brandanger Haga, Statoil Sigbjørn Sangesland, NTNU Bernt Sigve Aadnøy, UiS Jan Sæby, Shell Ståle Johnsen, Total Marvin Rausand, NTNU Mary Ann Lundeteigen NTNU 0 04.12.12 Original document Revision Date of issue Reason for Issue 1 Index Preface ................................................................................................................................................ 1 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................................................ 1 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1. What is well integrity? (Well integrity – concepts and terminology) ........................................... 5 2. Background and History ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pegasus Vertex, Inc. Drilling Software | Sophisticated Yet Simple
    Pegasus Vertex, Inc. Drilling Software | Sophisticated Yet Simple Drilling Industry Glossary www.pvisoftware.com/drilling-industry-glossary.html A Abandon: To temporarily or permanently cease production from a well or to cease further drilling operations. Abnormal Pressure: Pressure outside the normal or expected range. Ambient: A term generally used to describe surrounding temperatures or environments. Annular Blowout Preventer (Annular BOP): An annular blowout preventer is a large, specialized valve used to seal, control and monitor oil and gas wells. It is usually installed above the ram preventers that forms a seal in the annular space between the pipe and wellbore or, if no pipe is present, over the wellbore itself. Annular Pressure: Pressure in an annular space. Annulus: The annulus is the area between two concentric objects, such as, between the wellbore and casing or between casing and tubing, where fluid can flow. Axial Load: A load applied along the axis of a drill string, casing or tubing string. Azimuth: The compass direction of a directional survey or of the wellbore as planned or measured by a directional survey. The azimuth is usually specified in degree with respect to North Pole. For example, a well that goes east has an azimuth of 90 degrees. Azimuth Angle: This is the angle between the plane determined by the vertical and true North directions and the plane containing the wellbore direction and the true vertical. 1 B Back Off/Backoff: To unscrew one threaded piece, e.g. a section of pipe, from another. Balanced Cement Plug: Cement plugs for sidetracking wells are frequently set using the balanced cement plug method.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Well Integrity
    An Introduction to Well Integrity 0 Preface This document has been prepared as a joint project between members of the Norwegian Oil and Gas Association's Well Integrity Forum (WIF) and professors at NTNU and UiS. The intention with the document is to provide a document that can be used in educating personnel in well integrity and especially students at the universities. Authors of this document have been: Hans-Emil Bensnes Torbergsen, Eni Norge Hilde Brandanger Haga, Statoil Sigbjørn Sangesland, NTNU Bernt Sigve Aadnøy, UiS Jan Sæby, Shell Ståle Johnsen, Total Marvin Rausand, NTNU Mary Ann Lundeteigen NTNU 1 Index Preface ................................................................................................................................................ 1 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................................................ 1 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1. What is well integrity? (Well integrity – concepts and terminology) ........................................... 5 2. Background and History ................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 What can go wrong in wells? ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Defining Series: Blowout Preventers
    THE DEFINING SERIES Blowout Preventers Rick von Flatern Senior Editor Donut Before the development of blowout preventers, operators allowed pressured Packer fluids to flow uncontrolled from formations to the surface and into the atmo- sphere. Only after the pressure supporting these blowouts abated and sur- face pressures fell to a manageable level were rig workers able to cap the well. Blowouts were dangerous for the crew, threatened the well-being of the surrounding environment, damaged drilling equipment, wasted resources and caused irreparable harm to the producing zone. Operating piston In 1922, Harry Cameron and Jim Abercrombie designed and manufac- tured the first blowout preventers (BOPs). Assemblies of valves and other devices installed atop a wellhead during drilling operations are called BOP stacks; they provide a means by which rig crews are able to contain unex- pected flow and high pressures. They allow crews to manage these influxes by injecting dense fluids down the well, which stop, or kill, the flow of Figure 1. Annular preventer. The heart of the annular preventer is the sealing formation fluids; this kill operation is accomplished while preventing well element, which is composed of the donut and packer. When the preventer fluids from being released into the atmosphere. is actuated, hydraulic pressure is applied to the piston through the closing Within the E&P industry, the terms blowout preventer, BOP stack and hydraulic ports, causing it to move upward. This forces the sealing element blowout preventer system are used interchangeably. During drilling and com- to extend into the wellbore and create a seal around the drillstring or other tool in the wellbore.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Characterization of the Annular Flow Behavior and Pressure Loss in Deepwater Drilling Riser
    Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences Tech Science Press DOI:10.32604/cmes.2020.010699 Article Numerical Characterization of the Annular Flow Behavior and Pressure Loss in Deepwater Drilling Riser Chengwen Liu1,*, Lin Zhu1, Xingru Wu2,*, Jian Liang1 and Zhaomin Li1 1School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, China 2Mewbourne School of Petroleum & Geological Engineering, University of Oklahoma, OK, 73019, USA ÃCorresponding Authors: Chengwen Liu. Email: [email protected]; Xingru Wu. Email: [email protected] Received: 21 March 2020; Accepted: 24 April 2020 Abstract: In drilling a deepwater well, the mud density window is narrow, which needs a precise pressure control to drill the well to its designed depth. Therefore, an accurate characterization of annular flow between the drilling riser and drilling string is critical in well control and drilling safety. Many other factors influencing the change of drilling pressure that should be but have not been studied suffi- ciently. We used numerical method to simulate the process of drill string rotation and vibration in the riser to show that the rotation and transverse vibration of drill string can increase the axial velocity in the annulus, which results in the improve- ment of the flow field in the annulus, and the effect on pressure loss and its fluc- tuation amplitude. In addition, there are also multiple secondary flow vortices in the riser annulus under certain eccentricity conditions, which is different from the phenomenon in an ordinary wellbore. The findings of this research are critical in safely controlling well drilling operation in the deepwater environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Drilling and Well Construction, Chapter 6, Geothermal Direct-Use
    Chapter 6 DRILLING AND WELL CONSTRUCTION Gene Culver Geo-Heat Center Klamath Falls, OR 97601 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2.1 Cable Tool Drilling and well construction (probably one of the most This is not a drill in the common sense, because it is not expensive features of a geothermal direct use project) is often power rotated. This drilling method uses a heavy bit that is the least understood. This chapter provides the basics of repeatedly lifted and dropped that crushes and breaks the equipment and methods used for drilling and completion of formation. Figure 6.1 shows the basic elements of a cable tool geothermal wells. It provides data needed by architects, rig (Anderson & Lund, 1979). With a cable tool rig, an engineers, and consultants to assist them in specification experienced driller can drill through any formation, including writing, selection of contractors, and drilling and completion large crevices and caverns that can cause problems with other inspection. drilling methods. This method's main disadvantage is that it is slow. Most direct use geothermal wells can be drilled using conventional water well technology and equipment. Most of Drilling is accomplished with a tight drill line, as shown the wells will produce water at temperatures less than boiling in Figure 6.1. The pitman arm and spudder beam impart an and without artesian flow at the surface; however, some will up-and-down motion to the cable and drill bit. The length of be hotter or will flow. Blowout preventers and other cable is adjusted so that on the down stroke the tools stretch sophisticated safety equipment are not usually required; the line as the bit hits the bottom of the hole, striking with a however, this does not mean that there are not significant sharp blow and immediately retracting.
    [Show full text]