The Contemporary Development of ’s Urban Space ThePerspective ofCivil Society’sParticipation inChineseUrban Planning

Dissertation

zurErlangungdesakademischenGrades DoktorIngenieur anderFakultätArchitektur der BauhausUniversitätWeimar

vorgelegtvon

Liu, Chong

Geborenam24.Juni1975in Heilongjiang Weimar,2006

Gutachter:

Prof.Dr.habil.Dieter Hassenpflug BauhausUniversitätWeimar,Deutschland

Prof.Dr.Zhang Lingling InstituteofTechnology,

Prof.Dr.habil.HeinzSchwarzbach TechnischeUniversitätDresden,Deutschland

TagderDisputation:16.Januar2007

1 Acknowledgement

ThefirstpersonIwouldliketothankismysupervisorProf.Dr.DieterHassenpflug.Iowe himaprofounddebtofgratitudeforhissupport,encouragement and understanding over theyearsbothofmystudiesandofmydailylife.Hisknowledge onurbanplanning,soci ology,historyandpoliticshashelpedmegreatlytocarryonthisresearch,andwillfurther benefitmylife.Also,IwishtoexpressmywarmandsincerethankstoProf.Dr.MaxWelch Guerra of BauhausUniversity Weimar, Prof. Xu Feipeng of Technical University Qingdao, Prof.ZhangLingling ofHarbinInstituteofTechnology,andMr.FritzHubertofMunichfor theirvaluableinsights.

IwarmlythankMr.Xie Gang,Dr.Teng Junhong,Dr.ZhanErpeng,Mr.YangZengxian, Mrs.ZhangYanbo andMr.Leng Wei ofQingdao,Mr.Xu Hongpeng ofHarbin,Mr.Bernhard Raninger ofShenyang,Mr.JensChristian Wittig,Ms.FangChen,Mr.MarkKammerbauer of Weimar,Mr.Dominik Dittrich ofViennaandMr.Steven M. Brown of Detroit who offered variouskindsofassistancerelatedtomyresearch.Withoutsuch supportthisstudywould havebeenmoredifficult,timeconsuming,andexpensive.

Iamgratefultothestaffsofthemanyinstitutionsincluding Qingdao UrbanConstruction Archive, Qingdao CityArchive, Qingdao Municipal Library, National Library, Beijing University Library, Municipal Library, Koblenz Federal Achieve, Munich Bavaria National Library, Thuringia University and National Library (Jena), Library of Bauhaus UniversityWeimar, etc.,inwhichIwasallowedtoaccesstomaterialinnumerousarchives, periodicals,prints,historicnewspapersandphotographsdivisions.

Thefinancialsupportof the Graduiertenförderung of Free State Thuringia is gratefully acknowledged.

Lastbutnottheleast,Iowemylovingthankstomyparentsand myelderbrother.

2 Content

Acknowlegement 1

Introduction 7

Part I. The progress and deficits of the development of Qingdao’s urban space 15 1. Historic review of Qingdao’s spatial development 17 1.1 Theprofileofthecity 17 1.2 Theurbanplanandconstructionbefore1978 20 1.3 Summary 29

2. The progress of Qingdao’s contemporary spatial development 35 2.1 Urbanhousing 37 2.2 Heritageprotection 42 2.3 Publicspace 45 2.4 Urbantraffic 48 2.5 Summary 51

3. The deficits of Qingdao’s contemporary spatial development 57 3.1 Urbanhousing 59 3.1.1Resettlementconflict 59 3.1.2Spatialdifferentiation 62 3.2 Heritagepreservation 65 3.2.1Historicbuilding 65 3.2.2Historicarea 67 3.3 Publicspace 71 3.3.1Accessrestriction 71 3.3.2Ecologic function 73 3.4 Urbantraffic 75 3.4.1Roadsystem 75 3.4.2Publictraffic 78 3.5 Summary 82

3 Content

Part II. Civil society’s participation in planning theory and its potential for Qingdao’s 87 urban planning 4. Civil society’s participation in planning theory and in China’s law and poli- 89 tical statements 4.1 Thereviewoftheconceptsofcivilsociety 89 4.2 TheunderstandingofcivilsocietyintheChinesecontext 94 4.2.1Theemergenceoftheterm“civilsociety” incontemporaryChina 94 4.2.2ThemodeofcivilsocietyincontemporaryChina 96 4.2.3TheresourcesofcivilsocietyinChineseculture 100 4.3 Civilsociety’s participationinplanningtheory 106 4.3.1Citizeninvolvementfordecisionmaking 107 4.3.2Publicprivatepartnershipforfundingandmanaging 112 4.3.2.1On thecommunitylevel 114 4.3.2.2Abovethecommunitylevel 116 4.4 Civilsociety’sparticipation inChina’slawandpoliticalstatements 120 4.4.1Citizeninvolvementfordecisionmaking 120 4.4.2PPPforfundingandmanaging 123 4.5 Summary 127

5. Civil society’s participation in China’s planning practice: three case studies 131 5.1 HongKong’sKaiTak Project 133 5.2 Shenyang’s ResourceRecoveryProject 137 5.3 Qingdao’s Taidong Project 140 5.4 Summary 143

6. Recommendation for Civil Society’s participation in Qingdao’s urban plan- 147 ning: “Foundation of Collaborative Urban Solutions” 6.1Theprinciples 150 6.2Thepilotprojects 151 6.2.1TheCommunitybasedHousingWorkshop 151 6.2.2TheHeritagePreservationWorkshop 152 6.2.3ThePublicSpaceForum 153 6.2.4TheMassTransitForum 154

4 Content

Summary 159 Summery in 165

Listof figures 171 Notes 173 Bibliography 179 Curriculumvitae 191 Announcement 193

5 6 Introduction

Introduction

ThisthesisstudiesthecontemporarydevelopmentofurbanspaceinQingdao,acostal cityintheP.R.China.Threequestionswillbeanswered,namely:HowhasthecityofQing dao developeditsurbanspacesince1978’sreform?Wherehasitexcelled,andwhatare thedeficitsofthisdevelopment?Andhowcanthecityimproveitsurbanplanningtobetter copewiththeexistingproblems?Therearetwomainaddedvaluesofthisthesis.Firstly,it focusesonboththeprogressandthedeficienciesinQingdao’s spatialdevelopmentsince thereformof1978indiversifiedaspects,includinghousing,heritagepreservation,public spaceandurbantraffic,whichhasnotyetbeensystematicallydoneinChinaorintheWest; secondly,itpresentsanapproachforimprovingQingdao’s planningbasedontheunder standingofcivilsocietyfromaChineseperspective.

ThisstudyonthecontemporarydevelopmentofQingdao’s UrbanSpaceoriginatedpri marily frommypersonalinterest.IspentmorethantenyearsinQingdao,andhavealso participatedinhousingstudiesandheritagemappingwhilestudyingtowardmybachelor’s degree.SinceIstartedmystudiesintheculturalcityofWeimar,Germany, notonlythe aestheticcontextbetweenQingdao andGermany,butalsocontemporaryWesternplanning impressesmedeeply.IkeptandstillkeepthinkingaboutthepastandfutureofQingdao.

Themethodsutilisedinthisresearchincludemainlysecondarystudiesandfieldsur vey.1)Secondarystudiesutilizeddissertations,conferencecontributions,articlesinofficial newspapersandotherpublicationsaboutQingdao’s urbandevelopment.Also,theofficial statisticsofQingdao providequantitativedatainthisresearch.Thisworkwasmainlydone from 2002 to 2004. My resources were largely taken from in Qingdao Archive, Qingdao UrbanConstructionArchive,BeijingNational Library, Beijing University Library, Shanghai MunicipalLibrary,Koblenz FederalAchieve,MunichBavariaNationalLibrary,Thuringia Uni versity andNationalLibrary(Jena),etc.2)DuringthefieldsurveyinQingdao,respectively in2003andwinter2004,theauthorhaspersonallyobservedthephysicalformanduseof theurbanspaces streets,squares,parks,publicbuildingsandresidentialblocks,etc.,and alsomadecomparativephotostudiesbetweenthepastandpresent ofthesamespaces. Someinterviewsweremadewithplanners,architects,commoncitizens,andtouristsfrom 2003to2005.Throughthisprocess,mostopinionstheauthoracquiredaredetailedandin depth.However,mostintervieweespreferkeepinganonymous,especiallyinregardtotheir

7 Introduction

criticism.Thustheauthoronlyusestheinformationfromtheinterviewsasvaluablerefe rences butdoesnotquotethemasgroundsofargumentormakeparticularevaluations.

Inthefollowing,thethreemainobjectsofthisresearchwillbebrieflyintroducedin frontofthemaincontentsofthethesis,namely:Qingdao,urbanplanningandcivilsociety. a.Qingdao FirstappearingintheJiajing Period(15221566)oftheMingDynasty,“Qingdao” was originallythenameofanislandinthevicinityoftheeastwingoftheJiaozhou (Kiaochow) Bay,andthisislandiscalled“SmallQingdao” andusedasaparktoday.Duringthe,Qingdao wasalsothenameofthevillageoppositetoQingdao Islandunderthe administrationofJimo Town’sRenhua County.OnJune14th1891,theQing Government startedtheconstructionofamilitarybasearoundQingdao village,and6yearslater,the wholewasseizedbytheGermanNavyonNovember14th1897.Bythe treaty signedonMarch6th1898,Germanyacquireda99yearleaseonJiaozhou Bay,coveringa landacreageof551.753sqkm andwateracreageof576.500sqkm.[1]Theconstructionof anewcolonialcitywasrapidlystarted,andonOctober12th1899,theGermanEmperor WilhelmIInamedthenewurbanareaoftheJiaozhou Concession “Tsingtau”. In 1900’s masterplan,Qingdao wasalsothenameoftheEuropeanDistrictintheurbanarea.From 1899 to 1929, the whole city, including its urban and rural areas, was called either “Tsingtau” or “Kiaochow” in official documents or nongovernmental literatures of China, Germanyand.InApril1929theNationalistGovernment ()officiallynamed thecityQingdao.Remaininguntiltodayas“barrio” intheChinesegeographicandpolitic administrationhierarchy,thecitycoversthelandareaof1316.270sqkm.[2]Accordingto theBasicRulesforChineseOrthographylaunchedin1958, thewriting“Qingdao” replaces“Tsingtau” (Germanform)or“Tsingtao”(Englishform)intheP.R.China.Inbrief, thetermQingdao comprisesmainly4concepts:1)Qingdao Island,2)Qingdao Village,3) theEuropeanDistrictoftheformerGermancolonialcityinJiaozhou Region,and4)the formerGermancolonialcityandthecitygrownfromit.Thisthesisconcernsitselfwiththe fourthconcept.

b.Urbanplanning Generallyspeaking,theunderstandingoftheterm“urbanplanning” intheWestandin Chinabothcomprisestwomajoraspects.Firstly,itisasubject,anareaofstudy,which belongstothe29majorsubjectslistedbytheUnitedNationsin 1974.Secondly,itrefersto thegovernmentalorgovernment–led comprehensive activities for arranging the physical

8 Introduction

settingofacityencompassinglanduse;housing;openspaceand recreation;traffictrans portation;publicandhumanservices;conservationofenvironmentandheritageresources; etc.TostudyurbanplanninginChina,thelocalinterpretationofthistermisworthpaying attention to.Since1950'stherehavebeendiversedefinitionsofurbanplanninginChina’s official documents, claims and textbooks, which reflects “the changing demands for this domainwiththetime”.(Zou,D.C.,2005)In1999,twodecadesaftertheChinesereform, “Standardfor BasicTerminology ofUrbanPlanning” is publishedby ChineseConstruction Ministry,andit defines urbanplanning as“thecomprehensivearrangement,particularor ganisation,implementationandmanagementoftheconstructionissuesfortheeconomic andsocialdevelopment,landuse,urbanstructureandetc.” [3]Thisthesisadoptsthisdefi nition forthediscussionofurbanplanninginQingdao.Also,forthisresearch,urbanplan ning includesnotonlytheprocessofformulatingtheplanningdecisionindiversifiedlevels fromcommunitytothewholecity,butalsoabroadscopeofparticularpracticesforimpro ving theurbanenvironmentthroughofficialandnonofficialefforts.

c.Civilsociety Inthisthesis,“civilsociety” includesmainlythreesubspheres:1)thesphereofthe individual,familyandhousehold,2)thesphereofthecitizens’ organisations,publiccom munications andinteractions,aswellas3) the sphere of the nongovernmental bodies’ involvementfortheprovisionofthepublicservicesbetweenthe stateandtheeconomy. WhataretheoriginalWesternconceptsofcivilsociety– includingtheunderstandingsof Aristotle,Marx,Gramsci,Habermas,CohenandArato, and how has the author deduced the definition of civil society for contemporary China will be presented particularly in Chapter4.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningreferstotheparticipationofitsthreesub spheresinabroadscopeofplanningrelatedissues.Thisthesisbelievesthatnotonlyciti zen involvement in decisionmaking, but also some kinds of publicprivate partnerships (PPP)forimprovingurbanenvironment,whichinvolveindividualcitizens,citizens’ organi sations (likeresidentsandtheircommunityorganisations),orprivateenterprisesoffering nonforprofitefforts,alsobelongtotheparticipationofcivilsocietyinplanning.

There are two kinds of literature used as reference in this thesis, respectively the researchonQingdao’s urbanhistoryandtheintegratedstudiesofcivilsocietytheoryand China’surbanplanning.

T.Warner’sdoctoralthesis“TheUrbanPlanandDevelopmentoftheGermanfounded

9 Introduction

Qingdao inChina:theConfrontationwiththeForeign” (Warner,T.,1996)makesahistoric surveyof German’sconstructionactivityin Qingdao fromtheaspects of traffic, hygienic, landscape,andhousingdevelopment.ZhanE.P.’sdoctoralthesis“TheEmergence,Trans formation and Renewal of the Slum Areas in Qingdao: Residential Construction and the ChangeoftheUrbanStructureasaSocialProblemintheChinese CoastalCities” (Zhan,E. P.,2002)reviewedthehistoryofslumsinQingdao andexaminesthesocialeffectsofthe governmentalinterventiononslumrenewal.Anotherdoctoralthesis,“StudyontheUrban PlanningandtheEvolutionofQingdao 18971937” (Li,D.Q.,2003)focusesontherela tionship betweenurbanplanningandurbandevelopmentduringQingdao’s earlyphases, andshowshowplanningdevelopedfromWesterner’stransplantationintothepracticeof theChineseauthorities.Othercontributionsinclude“TheAestheticandCulturalValueof Qingdao’s UrbanLandscape” (Yang, Z.X., 2000), “TheHistoricalArchitecturein Qingdao 18911949” (Xu,F.P.,2005)andtheauthor’s“TheCharacterofUrbanDesigninModern Qingdao” (Liu,C.,2003),“FromtheFriedrichStreettotheMay4thSquare– Publicspaces inQingdao” (Liu,C.,2004),etc.

WiththeseworksofQingdao’s planninghistoryasimportantempiricalreferences,the existingintegratedstudiesofcivilsocietytheoryandChineseurbanplanningprovidevalu abletheoreticalhintsforthisthesis.“China’sUrbanTransition” (Friedmann,J.,2005)offers atransculturalunderstandingofChina’scivilsocietyandurbanplanning.Friedmann be lieves that the autonomous tradition similar to that of Western civil society has already existedinancientChinesecities;bothtraditionsandthepostMaoinstitutionsonthebase levelareimportantresourceformobilisingthecitizen’sinitiativesintheChinesemodern planning.Besides,theUNHabitatReports(UNCHS,1996~2005)providemanyinsightson publicparticipation and Publicprivate Partnership in planningrelated issues. “The Green BookofthePublicPrivatePartnershipforPublicUtilitiesinChina” (Qin,H.andYu,H.,2004) studiesthepotentialoftheparticipationofnongovernmentalpowerforimprovingurban infrastructureandotherpublicfacilitiesbythemeansofpublicprivatepartnershipprac tices.Chinesescholarlypapersoncivilsocietytheoryasapplicable tourbanplanninghave begunappearinginarchitecturaljournalsandinternationalconferencessincethedawnof thenewmillennium.Themostvaluablepapersforthisthesisinclude“CityPlaza– Public Space and Civil Society” (Chen, F., 2003), “The Role of the Chinese Planner and the Coming Thought of Civil Society” (He, D., 2003), and the author’s “On Civicoriented SpatialDevelopmentoftheChineseCity” (Liu,C.,2005),etc.However,thereflectionon China’sownculturaltraditionandthecontemporarycivilsocietydiscoursearecurrentlystill

10 Introduction

verylimitedintheplanningliterature.

Twolimitsofthisthesisneedtobenoticed.Firstly,itisacontributioninthefieldof urban planning, thus the discourse of civil society in sociology and political science fun ctions as the basis for planning approaches but not as the target. Secondly, the term “China” referstothePeople’sRepublicofChinaincludingtheregionof,however, thisthesisonlyfocusesonurbanplanningofMainlandChina.Therefore,thedevelopment ofcivilsocietyofTaiwan,andthelaw,politicsandpracticeconcerningcivilsociety’spartici pation inTaiwan’surbanplanningarenotmentioned.

TheimprovementofQingdao’s urbanplanningisthetheoretic coreof thisresearch. ThroughobservingQingdao fromaperspectiveofaChinesearchitectlivingin Germany, thisworkattemptstooffersomenewinsightsforthisyoungcity.Inabroadersense,the cityofQingdao canbeseenasacasestudyforunderstandingandanalysingthe ongoing Chineseurbantransitionasawhole;andtheauthoralsowishesthatthisthesishavere ferential valueforotherChinesecities.

11 LandscapeofBadaguanareaandtheneweasternarea 12 13 14 Part I. The progress and deficit of the development of Qingdao’s urban space

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

15 16 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

1. The historical review of Qingdao’s spatial development

Beforediscussingthecontemporaryurbanplanning and construction of Qingdao, the firstchapterofthisthesiswillpresentabriefhistoryofQingdao – howdidthiscitygrow from its establishment in the end of the 19th century, and how was its urban space developedandtransformedbeforeDengXiaoping’sreformin1978.

1.1 The profile of the city

Qingdao is a coastal city lying across the Peninsula with the Yellow Sea towardstheSouth.ThedistancebetweenQingdao andBeijing(tothenorth)andShanghai (tothesouth)arebothabout600km.Thecitycoversajurisdiction areaof10,654sqkm, including7districtsofShinan,Shibei,Sifang,Licang,Chengyang,Huangdao andLaoshan, aswellasthe5countyleveltownsofJiaozhou,,Jimo,Pingdu andLaixi.Ithas870 kilometercoastline (including that of islands in its jurisdiction), totaling onefourth of the totalcoastlineofShandongProvince.In2004ithad7.31millionresidents,686sqkm per capitainitswholejurisdiction area,with2.58millionresidents,2,341 sqkm percapitainits 7 urban districts.[4] It is the second most populated city in Shandong Province next to,theprovincialcapital.

Beijing

Qingdao

Shanghai Fig.11 Qingdao’s geographical location inChina

Fig.12 Former GermanOoccupied Kiautschou inShandong

17 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

Originally“Qingdao” wasthenameofanislandtothesoutheastoftheJiaozhou Bay, andavillageoppositetothisislandwascalled“Qingdao Village”.Inthehistory,theregion oftoday’sQingdao wasmostlyundertheadministrationofJimo countywithfishingasthe mainoccupationofinhabitants.Threatenedbyforeignnavies,Qing Governmentsent2000 soldiersin1891tobuildadefencebasenearQingdao village.In1897therewereabout60 storesandc.a.8,000residents. (Yuan,R.S.,1928,pp.75)

On14thNovember1897,theGermanNavyoccupiedJiaozhou Bayandimmediately startedconstructinganewcityasmilitarybaseandcommercialcolony.On12thOctober 1899theGermanEmperorWilhelmIInamedtheurbanareaofthiscity“Tsingtau” after thenameofQingdao Island.[5]TheGermansinvestedgreatlyinthecity’sinfrastructure, housingandmilitaryfacilities,andQingdao becameacitystrongly impactedbyGermanyin Asia.In1911Qingdao becamethesixthlargestharbourcityinChina.From1899to1913, Qingdao’s populationincreasedfrom84,000to187,000.[6]

InOctober1914Qingdao wasconqueredbytheBritishJapaneseAllianceandbecame a Japanese colony. The occupation authority attached much importance to expanding industry,whilethenumberofemployeesofthetextileindustryreached18,000,approxi mately 60% of the sum of industrial employees in Qingdao. In 1919 there were about 245,000JapaneseinhabitantsinQingdao,comprising25%ofthepopulationintheurban area. By 1922 Qingdao had become an influential industrial and commercial city with 289,411inhabitantsintotal.[7]

In1919,shortlyaftertheendoftheWorldWarI,theMay4thYouthMovementbroke outnationwideaimedattakingbackQingdao fromJapaneseoccupation.In1922,Japan returnedQingdao totheChinese.InApril1929,Qingdao wastaken overbytheChineseNationalisticGovernmentandbecameoneofthefour specialadmini strative zones in China. Under the peace circumstances Qingdao became the regional economic center. Theimportsandexports sumof QingdaoHarbourrankedfifthin 1931 andthirdin1934,andtextileindustryranked2nd(underShanghai)inthewholenation.In 1937,Qingdao’spopulationreached381,364,with60,000addedthrough1935’sterritory adjustment.[8]

During World War II Japan reoccupied Qingdao in January 1938. Like many other Chinese cities, the Japanese military invasion hindered Qingdao’s urban economy which grewwellinthebeginningof1930's.AfterthesurrenderofJapanin1945,Qingdao served

18 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

asabaseforthe WesternPacificFleetoftheUSNavy.In1947Qingdao’s populationwas 759,059,whichexceededtheprovincialcapitalcityJinan.[9]

In1949,theChinesecommunistpartytookoverQingdao.Until1956,all1,725private corporationspartlyreleasedtheirownershiptothestateand96.9%ofpeasantsjoinedin the Agricultural Cooperative Commune.[10] In 1960, the city finished “Public ownership transformation” ofallcorporations,thatistosay,thepublicacquiredtheownershipofall corporations’ propertyinthecity.Inthefirsthalfof1960'sthecitywaseffectedbyChina’s nationwideprogram“GreatLeapForward” (19581961)andalsobythe“ThreeYearsof NaturalDisasters” whichresultedinagreatdealofchaos.DuringtheCultureRevolution from 1966 to 1976, continuous political disturbance seriously destroyed the city’s social orderandeconomy.In1975,shortlybeforetheend of the Culture Revolution, Qingdao begantorenormalizeitssocialandeconomicdomains,anditachievedan80%increasein industrialproductioncomparedtothatof1974.In1978,as’sreformstarted, Qingdao’s population amounted to 1,060,000.[11] Contemporary, Qingdao is a regional economiccentreinEasternChina,oneofthecitiesofsubprovincialadministrationprivi lege,itaveragesmorethan15milliontouristsayear,andisthesiteofthefourthlargest harbourinChina.In2008,theOlympicSailingRegattawillbehostedthere.

Fig.13 Neweasternarea builtsince1992

19 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

1.2 The urban plan and construction before 1978

The first master plan of Qingdao during the German occupation (18971914) was comprised of the European district, Dabaodao District, Taidong District and Taixi District. The European District included a commerce area, a governmental area and a villa area. Dabaodao DistrictincludedacommerceareafortheChinesemerchantsand aharbourarea. Thesetwodistrictsweregeographicallydividedbytheexistingridges,andtheyformedthe centralareaofthenewcity.Theothertwodistricts,respectivelytoEastandWesttothe centre, were planned for the workers, who were either the peasants from local villages destroyed by the Germans or the working immigrants from the hinterland. The detailed plannedareainthefirsturbanplanwasonly5sqkm;whilethewholeacreagebetweenthe planneddistrictscoveredabout20sqkm.Thenewcolonialcitywasundertheadministration oftheMinistryoftheGermanNavy,withthenavy’schancellorstationedinQingdao asthe colony’sgovernor.Ratherthanacivilplanningbureau,thenavywasin chargeofallaffairs ofplanningandconstruction.

In 1904, the construction of QingdaoJinan (Shandong’s provincial capital) Railway, which connected the main coal mines of Shandong Province was finished. It penetrated Qingdao’s portandreachedthesouthernseashoreareaoftheEuropeanDistrict.Whileit metthetransportationdemandsofpassengerandcargoefficiently,theconnectionbetween theworkers’ DistrictTaixi andthecentralareaofthecitywasmuchhinderedbytherailway, andthisproblemstillexiststoday.TheQingdao Harbour,situatedinthenorthofDabaodao District,wasconstructedaccordingtothemostadvancedstandardsofthattime.[12]

Qingdao DistrictwasintendedtoexpresstheGerman characterandtobuild“aplace extra suitable for the living of the Europeans”.[13] Except for the Tianhou Shrine the Germans destroyed all the existing village constructions. European architecture style was required,whiletherailwaystation,bank,postoffice,club,bathingbeach,hippodrome,bo tanic gardenandetc.reflectedtheopenspaceconceptsoftheGerman citiesatthattime. Theheight,densityandstyleofthebuildingswerestrictlycontrolledbythemasterplanand various regulations; the buildings and their exterior urban space presented high building qualityandawellproportionedappearance.Thus,asK.Kunzmann mentions,Qingdao has keptawholesilhouetteoftheEuropeancityinitsoldcentre.(Kunzmann,KlausR.,2002, pp.98)

20 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

IntheDabaodao District,theChinesemerchantsbuiltmany2storystores,restaurants andresidences,andprosperousmarketsemergedalongthestreets.Boththearchitecture and the social life there were highly influenced by western culture. In the two worker’s districtsTaidong andTaixi,theGermansplannedrespectivelytwocentralsquaresfunction ing asmarket.Graduallyoccupiedbynewstoresandhouses,thestreetmarketswith“living upstairsandtradingdownstairs” becamethemainmarketforminthesetwodistricts,which thepeopleweremuchaccustomedtoatthattime.

InordertocompetewithotherimperialpowersinstrengthandimageintheChinese market,GermanarchitectureandurbanplanninginQingdao showsahighstandard;some buildingsevensurpassmanyintheirhometowninquality.Besides,theChinesetraditional skills were inevitably mixed in the Germanstyled buildings by the local craftsmen, which madethemalsosomewhatexoticfortheGermans.[14]Whilethearchitecturalheritageof theeraofWilhelmIIwastoalargeextentdestroyedinGermany duringWorldWarII,most oftheGermanbuildingsinQingdao stillexisttoday.

Fig.14Qingdao’scity center in1913 Fig.15Qingdao’scity center in2002

21 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

ThesociallifeofmostChineseinQingdao washighlyrestrainedbytheseparationof the European and Chinese districts; numerous military fortifications scattered in the city further hindered the mobility of people. With the emphasis of “Culture Policy” in China throughGermanyfrom1906,someeducationinstitutesfortheChinesewereestablishedin Qingdao. In 1909, the GermanChinese College (DeutschChinesische Hochschule) was founded in Qingdao by Germany and the Chinese Qing government. Due to the end of Germany’scolonisationinQingdao,manyteachersandstudentsfledtoShanghaiandjoined Tongji MedicalInstitute,whichwasthepredecessoroftoday’sShanghai. [15] After the end of Qing government in 1911, the separation policy was gradually abandonedforthesakeofattractingformerhighofficialstoQingdao.

Fig.16 Tianhou Shrine inthe1900's

DuringtheGermancolonialperiod,theurbanenvironmentofQingdao alsopresented theinfluenceoftheChineseinhabitants,whichreacheditsclimaxinthe“Tianhou Shrine Event”.FordemonstratingastrongGermanstyleandreducingtheChinese’sactivitiesinthe European District, the German authority planned to destroy the Tianhou Shrine in 1913. Since1487,Tianhou Shrinehasbeenasacredsiteforlocalfishermen’srituals;itwasalso equipped with a plaque written by China’s emperor Yongzheng (1678—1735). After the GermansseizedQingdao in1897itstillfunctionedasanvitalreligioussitefortheChinese. TheremovalplancausedastrongresistancefromtheChineseinhabitantsandimmigrant

22 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

merchant’sorganisations,includingLianhu association, Guangdongassociation,etc.[16] In ordertoquiettheprotest,theGermanauthorityhadtoshelvethisplan.Asaresult,the Tianhou ShrinewastheonlyChinesestyledbuildingleftintheEuropeanDistrictexceptfor theOldYamen (formerChinesemilitaryheadquarter),anditstillstandsuntiltoday.

InQingdao’s secondmasterplanreleasedin1910,theplannedurbanareaamountedto 80sqkm,fourtimesasmuchasitwasin1900’smasterplan. The urbanareaexpanded alongtherailwaytothenorth,presentingapreliminarybeltform.Sincemostadministrative andpublicbuildings,marketsandvarioussortsofprivatehouseswereconcentratedinthe European District and the Dabaodao Districts, these two districts functioned as Qingdao’s centralurbanareafornearlyacenturyuntiltheboomin the neweasternareabeganin 1990's.

AfterJapanconqueredQingdao inNovember1914,threephasesofurbanexpansion wereplannedbytheJapanese:

1.Thefirstphasewastheconstructionofthesocalled“NewUrbanArea” fortheimmi grants from Japan, and it was sited between Dabaodao District and the northern coast (around today’s Shichang’yi Road, Shichang'er Road, Shichang’san Road, Liaocheng Road andLinyi Road).Thisnewurbanareaalsoincludedabusinesscentreandafinancialcentre; both were dominated by Japanese investors. The total acreage amounted to 1,630,000 sqm.[17]

2.Inthesecondphase,theauthorityexploredtheareabetween“NewUrbanArea” and theTaidong Districtforcommerceandstorage,andtheareawesttoTaixi Districtfordwell ing.Thesetwoareascoveredrespectivelyc.a.400,000sqm and260,000sqm.[18]Besides thevillaareaintheeastoftheformerEuropeanDistrictwasexpandedtowardstheeastern wingoftheQingdao Bay.

3. The third phase focused on the area between Taidong District and the harbour’s bulwark to its northwest. It covered c.a. 1,980,000 sqm, but was not much developed before the Chinese Beiyang Government took back Qingdao in 1922.[19] Apart of these threephasesmentionedabove,industrywasconcentratedinthenorthoftheGreatHarbour andinSifang andCangkou,whichmadethecityfurtheritsexpansiontothenorth.

23 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

Phase 3

Phase 2

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 2

Fig.17ThecomparisonofQingdao’s CityAtlasesof1915andof1922

The size of the city grew three times and reached about 20 sqkm during the first Japaneseoccupation.SimilartotheGermancolonialperiod,themilitaryheadquarterwasin chargeofallcivilaffairs,withurbanplanningasmainlyaninstrumentservingfurthermili tary andeconomicpurposesoftheoccupier.Yettheracialseparationpolicywasnolonger maintained, and many public buildings, like cinemas, theatres, bathhouses and stock marketswhichwerebuiltwereaccessibletoallinhabitants.Withthegrowthofindustryand trade, the power of the citizens, which mainly included workers, merchants, and free professionals, was rapidly enhanced. This stimulatedQingdao’s housingmarketand other servicebranches.

From 1922 to 1929, under the administration of the Chinese Beiyang Government, Qingdao’s constructionexperiencedarelativelystagnantphaseduetothe unstablepolitical situation.ThemainconstructionprojectsincludedthereuseoftheformerBismarckBarrack forfoundingtheQingdao Universityandsome streetsandbridges restorations.Mostcon struction waslimitedintheexistingurbanarea.From1929onQingdaowasgovernedbythe ChineseNationalisticGovernment,with“theOrganisationLawoftheSpecialAdministrative Cities” guidingitscivilaffairs.Thislawempoweredthecitizenelectedsenatetoproposeand approveresponsibilitiesforurbanplanning,anditwasalsothe firststatuteinChinastating citizen’srightsinmonitoringgovernmentalactivitiesinurbanconstruction.

24 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

During the governing period of Mayor Shen Honglie from1931to1937,Qingdao ex perienced itssecondconstructionboomapartfromthatduringtheGermanoccupation.The mainprojectsincluded:

1.Eightlowincomesettlementswerebuiltreplacingtheshantytownswiththe invest ment fromthegovernment,thecitizen’sselfaidandcharityorganisations;theexpansionof residentialbuildingsinthenorthofTaidong District,thesouthwestofthe“NewUrbanArea” plannedbytheJapanese,andtheBadaguan VillaareatothenorthoftheHuiquan Bay.

2.Manypublicfacilitieswereenrichedorrenovated,includingtheCityAuditorium,the Zhanqiao Pier,theRedCrossComplex,theCityStadium,theCityAquariumandOceanMu seum,theZhanshan Templeandothers.MostofthemarestilllandmarksofQingdao today. Besides, the city made much effort to improve its tourism attractions by expanding the bathingbeaches,renovatinghistoricrelicsindowntownandinLaoshan Mountain,etc.The forestedlandareawasalsoexpandedduringthisperiod.

3. The industrial zones north of Taidong District were further developed, and by the 1930'stheareafortextileindustriesaloneamountedtomorethan6sqkm.Taidong District becameanodeconnectingthedowntownareatotheindustrialzonesSifang andCangkou, andthebeltformofQingdao wasreinforced.

4.Theconstructionofinfrastructureandeducationfacilitieswashighlystressedbythe authority.MayorShen believed“thematerialandculturaldevelopmentinthecountrysideis as important as that in the urban area”. Before 1935, at least one primary school was availableineachvillageandallparentswereobligedtogettheirchildreneducated.[20]

Asidefromthegovernmentaleffort,theinvolvementofcitizens(mainlyemployeesand employersofindustryorcommerce,freemerchantsandfreeprofessionals)andnongovern mentalorganisationswasalsoastrongpowerpromotingQingdao’s urbanenvironment.The planning critique of the industry delegates and the building of new religious places were influentialexamples.

In1932,delegatesofindustryandcommercebranchespresentedthegovernmenttheir critiqueonQingdao’s planning.Accordingtothem,themaindeficitsincluded:Firstly,many industrial,commercialandresidentialareaswerehighlymixed,thustheresidentswouldbe easily affected by noise and pollution; secondly, the publicowned markets were over

25 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

crowdedbytoomuchnonQingdao merchants,andtheprivatemarketswerenotsufficiently regulatedintheirbuildingconditions;thirdly,thelandsoldbythegovernmentdidnotin clude sportsfieldsandmarkets,ofwhichtherewasingreatshortage inthecity;etc.Raised bytheeconomicelites,thesecritiquesshoweddiscriminationagainsttheurbanunderclass andnonQingdao merchants,thoughtheyreflectedmanyrealisticproblemsofurbanplan ning andcontributedconcretelytoQingdao’s MasterPlanof1935intheaspectofpublic spacebuilding.

Fig.18MasterPlanofQingdaoin1935, Fig.19Zhanshan Templebuilt1932 integratedopinionsofcitizen’sdelegates 1944throughcitizens’ donation

The construction of Zhanshan Temple can be seen as an early attempt of “public privatepartnership” inQingdao’s history.The10ha.landforthetemplecomplexwasfreely allocatedbythegovernment,whilethemainfinancialsupportwasprovidedbythesociety. Apartfromthecitizen’sdonation,“Zhanshan Futian Stock” wasissuedpubliclyforcollecting

26 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

private investment. Since the temple's completion in 1944, it enriched Qingdao’s cultural identityandmadethisyoungcityoneofthemajorhostcitiesforBuddhistevents.

In1934,theSt.MichaelCathedralwasfinishedthroughthedonationofGermanreli gious organisations. “The towers of the cathedral in Qingdao were higher than all other churchesinthemajorcitiesofNorthernChina– ,Beijing,Dalian orJinan.Theydomi nate thesilhouetteofQingdao;theyareparticularlyimpressiveformashipenteringthehar bour.” (Warner,T.,1994,pp.248)Exceptforsomeinternalevents,the newsacredsitesof Qingdao wereaccessibleforallpeople;theyfunctionedasunmistakable spacesforvarious religiousadherentsoftheincreasinglydiversifiedcity.

Fig.110SkylineofQingao’s coastwithSt.MichaelCathedralinthe1950's

From January 1939 to August 1945, Qingdao was occupied by Japan again. In June 1939, the Japanese colonial authority combined Qingdao with Jimo Town and Jianzhou Town and formed the socalled “Great Qingdao”. The purpose of urban planning was to makeQingdao a“GatetoNorthChina;importanthubforlandtransportation,waterwayand airlines; important military base for invading North China; industrial base and tourist site”.[21] The expansion of the harbour and the iron industry were the main focus of Qingdao’s planninginthisperiod.ThenumberofmassiveironindustrialprojectsinQingdao increased from 7 to 20 from 1938 to 1942. Since most of the new projects were sited

27 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

aroundShuiqinggou,Liuting tothenorthofTaidong District,thecitygrewfurthertothe north,formingatypicalbeltform4to5kmwideand25kmlong.

WiththesurrenderofJapanonAugust15th1945,WorldWarIIendedandtheNa tionalistic GovernmenttookoverQingdao again.Qingdao’s governmentplannedtostreng thenthefunctionalzoningintheconstructedurbanareaandthe Laoshan Mountain’stour ismarea,butthisattemptwashinderedbytheChineseCivilWar betweentheNationalist andtheCommunistParties.In1947,Qingdao wasoneoftheeightlargestcitiesinChina.

FromthefoundationoftheP.R.C.in1949tothestartoftheopendoorreform1978, Qingdao’s urbanconstructioncouldbegenerallydividedintothefollowingphases:

1. Phase 19491958: During this period urban construction was concentrated in the centre(aroundSifang District)andthenorth(around Cangkou District) focusing on infra structure,publicandresidentialbuildings.Besides,twomajorparksinthenortherndistricts, Haipo RiverParkandCangkou Parkwerefinished,andthespecialised“recreationalzone” wasestablishedaroundBadaguan VillaAreaanditseastern vicinity. Due to the national widepolicyofsavingnonproductiveinvestment,manyresidentialbuildingswereconstruct edwithquitelowstandards,usinginferiormaterialsandequipment.

2.Phase19581965:Muchaffectedbythe“GreatLeapForward” (19581961)[22]and the“ThreeYearsofNaturalDisasters”(19591961)[23],Qingdao’s constructionwasgeneral ly instagnationexceptforsomemeasurestakenfrom1963to1965. Theyincludethere settlementofsomefactorieswithimproperlocation,thereductionofindustrialprojectsand therenewalofsomeslumsinTaixi District.

3.Phase19661978:ThetenyearCultureRevolutionstartingin1966droveQingdao’s construction into chaos. Urban planning was stopped with many planners and engineers labelled “capitalism’s followers”. About 500,000 sqm buildings were constructed without technicalapprovalandmanyindustrialprojectswereinsertedin downtown.Placedinthe vicinityofthecoastalrecreationarea,theBeihai Dockyardthreatenedthebathbeachesby itspollution.[24] Sometemples,churchesandhousesoffamouspersonalitieswereheavily demaged byimpetuousstudents.From1976to1978thecitybeganto recover from the chaos. The government finished the Central Bus Station and renovated the roads and templesinLaoshan Mountain.

28 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

1.3 Summary

Qingdao’s urbanconstructionfrom1897to1978hadalwaysbeencontrolled by“top down” management;anditisatypicalcitybuiltincompleteaccordancewiththegovern mental urban planning in China. Having grown rapidly from small fisherman’s villages to influentialmoderncity, Qingdao’s planningpracticesreflects a strong governmental inter vention,especiallyintheperiodsoftheGermanoccupation(18971914),thefirstJapanese occupation(19141921)andthefirstNationalisticgovernance(19291937). From1949to 1978, although Qingdao’s urban construction was frequently interrupted by continuous political movements, governmentlet planning still played an important role for promoting urbanhousing,publicbuildingandinfrastructureprovision.Inaddition,duetobeingmainly controlledbyoneexclusiveplanningauthority,Qingdao presentsamoreharmoniousurban landscapethanmanyothercitieslikeShanghai,Wuhan andTianjin,whichwerebuiltunder differentauthorities’ simultaneouscontrol.

Apartfromthestrengthoftheauthority,thenongovernmentalspherealsocontributed muchtothedevelopmentofQingdao’s urbanenvironment. Theprotectionof the Tianhou Shrine from destruction in the 1910’s, the joint effort for the construction of Zhanshan Temple,theindustryandcommercedelegates’ critiqueonplanningproblemsinthe1930’s areallrepresentativeexamplesofsuchcontributions.After1949,sincethenongovernmen tal spherewasmuchweakenedinstrength,itsabilitytopromoteQingdao’s planningfaded away.

29 30 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

1. HistoricreviewofQingdao’sspatialdevelopment

Cangkou

Laoshan

Sifang

Great Harbor

Shibei Taidong

Small Harbour

Shinan

Taixi Zhanqiao Pier Beihai Dockyard Badaguan Luxun Park

Fig.111Qingdao’s urbanareain1964,notmuchchangeduntiltheendofthe1970’s

31 ZhongshanRoadareainQingdao’s historicinnercity 32 33 34 Part I. The progress and deficit of the development of Qingdao’s urban space

2. TheprogressofQingdao’s contemporaryspatialdevelopment

35 36 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

2. The Progress of Qingdao’s contemporary spatial development

Since1978 ,theurbanplanningofQingdao hasrecoveredfromthechaosoftheCul tural Revolutionandenteredastableera.With the increase ofgovernmental financial reve nue andthe establishment ofthe building market,Qingdao is experiencing anew construc tion boom. Qingdao’snewimprovement ofurban housing, heritageprotection,publicspace andtrafficsystemwillbediscussedinthefollowing.

2.1 Urban housing

The origin ofQingdao’s housing problems is largely rooted inthe colonial urbanization andindustrializationthatoccuredduringthe GermanandJapanese occupations.The villages inthe planned urbanarea were dismantledandtheoriginalinhabitants lost their homes. Many ofthe villagersbecame coolies ofthe urbanconstruction together with inland immi grants.TaidongandTaixi districts were planned by Germans for these laborers,andthere were alsorough selfbuilt shanty areas scattered onthe edge of the city. The growth of commerce and industy during the first Japanese occupation (19141922) caused massive emigration from inland to Qingdao. Cangkou district andSifang became new industrial focused districts with densely built worker settlements,while the population density ofthe existing laborer districts andshanty areas rapidly increased. In the 1930's, Qingdao’s Nationalistgovernment launched the construction of“populace settlements” (Chinese: 民众 大院) toease the serious housing problem,yet this effort was hindered by the second Japaneseinvasion inQingdao in1937.During the AntiJapanese War(19381945)andthe ChineseCivilWar(19471949),the influx ofalargequantity ofinland refugees andthe lack ofplanning measures greatly worsened the housing situation ofthe middle andlower inhabi tants.Until the founding ofP.R.Chinain1949,there were atotalof16,127families living in slum areas,the average acreage percapitawasonly 2.5 sqm.[25] Except for some new settlements around the northern industrial zones, Qingdao’s housing situation was much improvedfromthe1950’stothe1970’s.TheGuangrao RoadSettlements,oncethelargest and most densely populated slum towns, covered 5.12 hectares, with more than 1,800 households and5,400residents,andthe residential acreage ofmost ofthe households was less than 20sqm.Besidesthis,somelowstandardsettlementsbuiltinthe1950'sandthe 1960's by the government were in great need of renovation, like Happiness Settlements (Chinese: 幸福楼)nearTaixi.

37 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Fig.21 Taidong’s neighbourhood before therenewalof the1980's

Fig.22 Taidong’s neighbourhood after therenewalofthe1980's

38 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Sincethe1980’s,thedevelopmentofQingdao’s urbanhousingcanbegenerallydivided intotwophases:thestartingofslumrenewalaccompaniedbythe buildingofnewresidential areasinexistingurbanareafrom1983to1993;thelargescaleslumrenewalandtheresi dential constructionalongwiththeneweasternurbanarea’sdevelopmentfrom1994tothe present.

Inthe first phase,government andthe construction enterprises became the main sources of funding, neither of them regarding making profits as their main purpose. The government hoped tosolve the housing problem inanefficientwaywith fiscal support;the construction enterprises, most of which were stateowned, mainly aimed to acquire some residential units for their staff.According tothe housing policy inthis phasethe residents of the slum areas could get alargerresidence after the completion ofthe renewal,andthis was welcomedby most residents.

From1983onward,thecitygovernmentlaunchedlargescaledrenewalprojectsinXing fuSettlements(inXijiang Road),Shuanghe Lane(in Road),Xinhua Lane,Lijin Road 28’,NorthandSouthZhongjiawa (inTaidong),Rigang (inCangkou),eightPopulaceSettle ments (inTaixi),etc.Also,241,000sqm ofhouses indangerous conditionwere renovated. InTaixi,3PopulaceSettlements sited westofthe railway station,the renewal in1987and 1988improved the average residential area from 3.82sqm/Capita to 9.42 sqm/Capita for 802households and3,288residents.[26]Althoughthe situation stillhad abig gap compared with the new residences constructed after the mid1990's,it wasagreat improvementfor Taixi’sresidents atthat time.From1979to1985,thenewlycompleted residentialacreage andtherenovatedhousingacreagetotalledabout2millionsqm,whilethe annual completed new residential acreage wasover 1,000,000sqm from1986to1990.[27]In1984thecity begantoexploit,whichissitedinthewesternbankoftheJiaozhou Bay, as a “Economic and Technical Development Zone”. This strategy provided much industrial land for the growing investment, and also somewhat eased the housing shortage of the city.[28]

During this phase,playgrounds,kindergartens andschools are integrated inthe newly built or renovated residential areas,though many ofthose inthe innercity lackwell organised public green areas.Because ofthe pursuit ofthe southern orientation andmaximal acreage,most ofthe residential projects adopted aparallel layout with repeating one or several standard units.Formany residents,suchmodeis apparently better thanQingdao’s

39 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

traditional Liyuan courtyard housing considering the aspect of sunlight (especially for the housingunitswithoutcentralheatinginwinter),however,thecommunityenvironmentfell intoastereotypedconvention.Fortacklingwiththisissue,somelaterprojectsformaquasi “E” shapebyconnectingtheparallelbuildingswith theeastwest units,thus, a relatively continuousfacadeinterfacecanbeavailableforthestreet.Thispatternisparticularlyused alongmaintrafficstreetsorincommercialareaswithservicefunctionsinthelowerstories ofthebuilding.Qingdao’s Etypehousingcanbeseenasamixedmodeloftheindustrialized residencepatternandthetraditionalLiyuan.Whileguaranteeingthesouthernorientationfor mostresidents,itmeetspeople’sdailyneedsofshoppingandcommunication.Todaythis patternisstillseenveryofteninthenewhousingprojects.

Qingdao enteredthesecondphasein1994asthemunicipalgovernmentresolvedto developtheeasternarea.Theeasternareacoversanareaof100 sqkm betweentheold downtownandtheLaoshan Mountain,andhastheadvantageofconvenienttrafficaccess andexposureto thecoastallandscape.In1995and1996,thefinishedresidences inoldand new areas totalled 1,825,000 sqm. Four years after the start of the eastern area’s con struction,thegovernmentsetforththetargetof“finishingallslumarearenewalbeforethe newcentury”.In1998,17slumrenewalprojectsconcerning15,000households beganand aboutmillionsqm residenceswerebuilt;in1999,thenewlybuiltresidencesamountedto 4,613,000sqm.(Qingdao StatisticBureau,19902000)

Fig.23andFig.24 Sifang Neighbourhood andFushan NewTownbuiltin the1990's

40 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Theofficialnewspaper,Qingdao Daily,commented“… withtightfinancialbudgets,itis aroughtasktocompletethereconstructionof24,000households inslumareaswithintwo years.… Webrokethroughthetraditionalwayofthinkingandchangedtheformer‘limited propertyright’ tothepresent‘completepropertyright’.Inadditiontogetting theoriginal acreage,theresidentscanbuythenewacreageforalowprice.Whiletheoriginalresidents areresettledin other urban areas, their original area is sold for real estate development through auctions. Through these two measures the government raises the funds for the slumrenewal.” [29]

Sincethebeginningofthe1990's,the“welfarehousingdistributionsystem” basically endedwiththedeepeningof“jointstock” reformof manypublicowned corporations. The mainbodyof housinginvestmenthas nolongerbeenthegovernmentbuttherealestate corporationswhichaimonmaximizingprofitfromthemarket.During the 9th “FiveYear Plan” period (19962000), the housing investment totalled 17.24 billion RMB, while the governmentaccountedforonlyabout10%withtheinvestment of the nongovernmental sectorsabout90%.From1983to1998,thenumberofregistered“citylevel” construction corporationsinQingdao grewfrom21to175.[30]Though the marketoriented reform of housinghasalsosomenegativesides(whichwillbediscussedin thefollowingchapter),it has greatly improved the living standard in the city. By the end of 2003, the residential acreagepercapitawas22.96sqm,3.5timesofthatin1990.[31]

Withthemarketorientedreform,housingisnolongerwelfaredistributedtoemployees of corporations, but a good provided by the market. Besides, many enterprises also purchaseresidencesforrentingtotheirstaff.Thepurchaser’sexpectationforinteriorlayout and the exterior environment increases; and the developers and design institutions must reactwelltosuchexpectationsinordertoensuretheirprofit. Variouscompetitionsprovide architects, planners and engineers with many chances to present their offerings. For example, the “Sifang Settlement”, finished in the late 1990's, gained the National golden “Luban Prize” for its concepts of communicative spaces and its landscaping. In brief, the interaction of various figures of the building market contributes much to the quality of newhousing.

41 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

2.2 Heritage preservation

Qingdao is a representative Chinese city built according to modern planning from its establishment;italsopossessesabundantarchitecturalheritage fromChina’smodernhistory. BeforethefoundingofP.R.Chinain1949,Qingdao hadattractedalargequantityofdo mestic andinternationalimmigrantsaswellasinvestment.Duetothediversityofpeople’s origin,nationalityandtaste,thearchitectureofQingdao isalsohighlydiversified.Thereisa large number of Europeanstyle buildings left by the Germans, buildings influenced by thoughts such as “ChinaWest mixture” and “tradition renaissance” and some modern “Bauhaus” buildingsaswell.Until1949Qingdao hadmorethan1000buildingsownedby foreignersfromover20nationsincludingGermany,Japan,England,America,Russia,etc.,in whichtheGermanandtheJapaneseaccountedforabout1/3.[32]Theurbanplanandthe architectureofQingdao’s oldcityarethedominantcomponentsendowingQingdao anation widefamousimageas“greentree,redtile,blueseaandazuresky”,whichwasoriginally writtenbythefamousreformerKangYouwei.

Fig.25 The historic innercity ofQingdao

42 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Though China has set up its legislative system for heritage preservation since the 1950's, the understanding of architectural preservation was generally limited to the essentially meaningful architecture and the sites of the revolutionary events of the Communist Party. Due to lack of recognition of the value of the historical city, many influential architects and scholars, including Liang Sicheng, Chen Zhanxiang, etc. were officially criticized for their preservation efforts. The Culture Revolution caused great damagetoChina’sarchitecturalheritagenationwideincludingthecityofQingdao.Many “RedGuards” ransackedmanyhistoricalbuildings,includingtheveryinfluential ones like Tianhou Shrine,theZhanshan TempleandtheDaoismcomplexoftheLaoshan Mountain; they also burned many valuable construction archives as “the remains of feudalism and capitalism”.St.Pauls ChurchwasusedastheRevenueOfficeofShibei District,withthe betheldividedintoatwofloorofficesection.Fortunately,comparedtootheroldcitiessuch asBeijing,,Kaifeng,Qingdao’s historicenvironmentasawholewasrelativelywell preserved.Mostofthepublicbuildingslikethegovernmentbuilding,thepolicestationand thecourtcontinuedtheiroriginalfunctions.Manyvillasorapartmentbuildingsbecamethe property of government departments or stateowned enterprises, some wellbuilt ones were distributed as residences to leading staff, thus many of them received proper maintenance.

Since the 1980's, Qingdao’s heritage preservation has obtained increasing financial, legislative and technical supports for the city’s economic and cultural development. Particularpreservationobjectswereformulatedin19841994’sMasterPlan,1989’sUrban Construction and Planning Provisional Measures and its supplement in 1994. In 1995 2010’sMasterPlan,suchobjectsarelistedas“onedistrict” (theoldsoutherndowntown area), “nine zones” (the historical street areas) and “eightyeight spots” (the important buildingsorrelics).[33]Also,thegovernmenthasbuilttheCityMuseum,theNavymuseum, theFolkCustomMuseum,theArtilleryRuinMuseumandtheGovernorResidenceMuseum through renovating of the historical buildings and sites, and the surroundings of many historicbuildingsarerenewedsothattheirfacadescanbewell presentedtothepublic.

Someresidencesofhistoricpersonalitiesarealsoopenedasmuseumsafterrenovation. In 2000, the Shandong Provincial Government announced 345 “outstanding historical buildings”,131ofwhicharelocatedinQingdao.Nowadays,6“nationallevelculturalunits”, 22“provinciallevelculturalunits”,morethan200“citylevelculturalunits” andabout20 residencesofhistoricalpersonalitiesarelistedintheofficialpreservationscope.[34]InJuly

43 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

2000,Qingdao setforththeslogan“HumanityOlympics” afterbecomingthe host cityof Olympic Sailing Regatta in 2008. The government plans to renovate more historical buildingsandopenthemtothepublicasoneofthekeymeasures fortheOlympicsevent. Besides, a tourism route connecting some important historic sites and the coastal land scape wouldalsobeavailable.Inthe“OlympicsSeriesProjects” thereisalsothefirstBeer MuseumofChinasponsoredbyTsingtao BreweryCompany.Itislocatedintheformersite oftheGermanandBritishjointventure“Germania Brewery” (builtin1904).Intheendof 2004,thecitystartedtorenovatetheformer“JailfortheEuropeans” (builtin1900)forthe purposeofaspecial“JailMuseum” withexhibitionhalls,multimediacabinetsandreading room.Withthefinancialsupportofthegovernment,Qingdao Achieveorganizedanexpert delegationforvisitingKoblenz NationalArchive,Freiburg MilitaryArchive,PotsdamNational AchieveandmanyotherinstitutionsinGermanyin2004.Thisdelegationhasacquiredan entirecopyofthearchivesrelatingtoQingdao’s history,andnowQingdao Archiveiswork ing withgreateffortfortheirpublication.

Fig.26 Regenerationof Fig.27,28 RenovationoftheGovernor’s theSt.MichaelCathedral Square ResidenceandtheGermania Brewery

44 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Inthesummerof2005,Qingdao’s “Bagaguan” VillaArea,builtfrom1920'sto1940's, was listed in “the five Chinese most beautiful places” withXiamen’s Gulang Island,Su zhou’s oldcity,Maucau’s downtownandBeijing’sShenshahai area.Thisevaluationbythe ChineseGeographicMagazine,somescholarsoftheNationalAcademyandnearlyahun dred expertsisanationalrecognitionnotonlyforQingdao’s culturalheritagebutalsoits preservationefforts.However,thereisstillagreatneedtoprotecthistoricbuildingsand areasintheongoingconstructionboom,whichwillbediscussedinChapterThreeofthis thesis.

The vitality of Qingdao’s tourism industry shows the importance of heritage preservationforthecity’seconomy.Accordingtothestatistics,thenumberofthedomestic and foreign tourists amounted to 3.20 million from in the first quarter and the tourism incomeamountedto2.89billionRMBdespiteofthechaoscausedbySARSin2003.[35]In the first quarter of 2004, the sum of the tourists reached 3.46 million and the tourism income3.24billion.In2004,thetourismindustryaccountedfor 9.6%ofthewholeGDPof thecity.Duringthe“GoldenWeek” fortheNationalDayin2005,thecityreceivedapproxi mately 855,000guestswithin7holidays.[36]

2.3 Public space

In the 1930's, the famous reformer Kang Youwei of the late Qing Dynasty settled downinQingdao andboughtahousebuiltbyaGermanofficial.HedescribesQingdao asa city in “Green mountains and trees, blue sea and sky”. However, what people praised about Qingdao was mainly the southern area, which includes the former “European District” anditseasternexpansionareaalongthecoastformedbeforethe1940's.Between this area and the others, there has always been a great difference concerning building densityandlandscaping.Accordingtothestatisticin1950's,Qingdao’s greenareatotaled 2.346millionsqm,ofwhich72.55%belongstothesouthernarea.Whilethegreenarea percapitaamountedto14.82sqm inthesouthernarea,theratiointheformer“laborer’s district” Taidong waslessthan0.01sqm.[37] From1949to1964,Qingdao mademany effortsinrenovatingthegreenareasdestroyedduringthewarandconstructingnewparks and community gardens. But this work ceased almost completely during the Culture Revolution. In 1976, the destroyed green area, parks and gardens amounted to circa 103,000 sqm, and 4.30 million sqm planned green area was occupied for other

45 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

purposes.[38] Inthefollowing,theprogressofQingdao’s urbanpublicspacesince1978’s reformwillbepresented,focusingongreenareas, leisureandeventfacilitiesaswellas shoppingandcateringplaces.

Firstly, the quantity of green area, including public parks, gardens, roadside and waterfrontgreeneryandetc.increaseslargely.From1986to1990,publicgreenbeltarea increasedfrom3.56millionsqm to4.51millionsqm,[39]withagrowthof26.5%.Inthe endof1990,Qingdao’s greenerycoveragewas24.44%andtheaveragegreenerywas3.7 sqm/Capita.Thesetworatiosincreasedto35.5%and9.3in1999and 37.5%and9.3%in 2001.[40]In2003,thecitystartedlaunching“eightgreenprojects” forimprovingmoun tain forestryandlandscapeforwaterfrontareas.Bytheendof2004,theaveragegreenery amountedtocirca10sqm/Capita,whichissimilartocitieslikeShanghai,TokyoandOsaka.

Secondly,thedailyleisureandeventholdingplaceshavebeencontinuouslyexpanded throughnewconstructionorrenovationprojects.Beforethe1990's,Qingdao’s capacityfor holding exhibitions, sports, conference, and other events was quite limited. With the construction of the eastern new area, Qingdao International Exhibition Center, Yizhong Stadium,theDolphinWorld,theBeerCityandmanyotherpublicprojectswerecompleted, andQingdao’s owneventsliketheQingdao BeerFestivalandSummerMusicFestivalare gainingincreasingattention.Inthe1990's,theDonghai Streetwasthe“flagship” projectin Qingdao’s neweasternarea.12publicparksandabout30,000sqm greeneryaswellas manyartworkschosenfrompubliccompetitionsareplannedalongthis12.8kmlongcostal street.TheMay4thSquare,situatedinfrontofthenewcityhall,isthebiggestsquarein Qingdao’s urbanarea,providinganiceplaceforflyingkites,skatingor holdingceremonies. Since2000,thecitizen’sevent“HappyWeekend” isheldinthesquaresinbothnewand oldurbanareas.Communitiesshowtheirselforganizedprogramswhileexpertsofferfree instructions.

Thirdly,theshoppingandcateringplacesforcitizensaremuchimproved.Before1978, as the consumption level of the citizens was quite low, most consumption places were furnishedsimplyanddisplayeddifficultypresenting own identities, except for some “old brand” stores or restaurants in the Zhongshan Road or its neighboring snack alleyway “Pichai Yuan”.Sincethe1990's,theretailinggiants such as Carrefour, Metro and Jusco bringnewmanagementconceptsintoQingdao.Peoplebecomefondofexperiencingfresh andclientorientedconsumptionenvironments;theinteriorpedestrianstreetsandfastfood

46 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

stores in shopping malls also provide greater convenience for people’s communication. Withthegrowingincomeofcitizensandthedevelopmentofurban traffic,peoplegetused to choosing restaurants, cafes and tea houses for leisure, entertainment or business conversation. Meanwhile, people’s expectation for their service and atmosphere is also rising.Manyoftheseplacesaremadelikesmall“themeparks”,presentingspecialcuisine andregionalarchitecture.[41]Suchanattemptmakespublicspacemore diversified and vivid.

Also,inthe11th“FiveYearPlan” (20062010),Qingdao claimstoputmoreeffortsin “Creative Economy” through “integrating technology, commerce, creation and culture together to improve the urban competitiveness and change manufacturebased city to creativebasedcity”.Asanattempt,“Maidao CultureStreet” hasinvitedtheworldfamous “imageexpert” Kotler tooffertheconcept.Thegovernmenthopesthatpublicplaceswith “CreativeEconomy” wouldbeanew“highlight” inQingdao andaddanewattractivearea fortourists,investorsandyoungprofessionals.

b

Fig.29 Neweventholding places inQingdao a.BeerCity b.May4thSquare c.Yizhong Stadium d.OceanPark

47 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

2. 4 Urban traffic

DuetothecolonialurbanisationandtheboomintheNationalistgovernment’speriod inthe1930's,Qingdao’s urbantraffichadarelativelyhigher“startingpoint” incomparison tomostotherChinesecitiesafter1949.Fromthe1950'stothe1990's,theexistingurban arearemainedrelativelyunexpanded,whilemostpeopleliveinthecollectivecommunities, eitherinthevicinityoftheirworkingplaceorwithcommuter’svehiclesoftheircorporation. Withbicyclesandbusesasmajormeansoftransportation,the trafficinthe urbanarea functionedwell,whilethefardistancetrafficbetweentheurbanandruralareaswasrather inconvenient. From 1949 to 1978, Qingdao constructed 2,387 km of roads, 61.29% of whichwaslowstandard.[42]Withtheincreasingpopulation– theaverageannualpopu lation increaseof2.15%from1978to1998 thecontradictionbetweentheinfrastructure andthetrafficdemandsbecameaseriousissueforthecity.The constructionofthenew easternareaeasesthetrafficpressureofintheoldcity,also,thegovernmenthasmade greateffortstopromotepublictrafficanditsroadnetwork.

Firstly,variousprojectshavebeenlaunchedinordertoimprove theexistingroadnet workandbuildnewtrafficarteries.Fromtheyear1999to2002, roadacreageofQingdao increasedfrom17.888millionsqm to24,159millionsqm withanannualgrowthofmore than 12%.[43] From 1998, the government began to constructthe16.6kmHongKong Roadanditsparallelstreet,the12.8kmDonghai Road.Thetworoadsplayavitalrolein connectingtheeasternnewareaandwesternoldcity.TheHongKongRoadprojectalso wonthe“GoldenCup” ofNationalInfrastructureProjectsin2000.Anothertraffic artery, “EastWestExpressLine” wasfinishedin2003.Itis8kmlongwithawidthof40to60m. and 9 overhead vehicle junctions. Due to its multilayers, there are no traffic lights or crossing,andthedesignatedspeedis60to80km/h.Inthepast,ittooknearly45 minutes totravelfromtheMunicipalHospitalinthewesttoYinchuan Roadintheeast,andnow only8minutesareneededatthedesignatedspeedof60km/hthroughtheExpressLine. To date, it is the largest and most expensive road project in Qingdao. The investment amounted to 1.14 billion RMB for the first phase and to more than 500 million for the secondphase;inotherwords,eachinhabitantofQingdao wouldpayabout820RMBfor thisproject.Duringtheconstructiontherewerealotofcitizenswatchingand discussing aroundthebuildingsitewithexpectationsregardingitsfutureroleforthecity.

48 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Fig.210HongKongRoadandDonghai Road,twoarteriesinthesouthofthecity

Secondly,thegovernmentaddresses“publictrafficasprecedence”.Aseriesofregula tions issetforth,includingconstraintsforprivatemotorvehicle’sdrivingtimeandzones andtheprovisionofbusonlylanesinmanybusilyusedstreets.Althoughthesumofthe publicbusesandroadlengtharelessthanmanyothercities,Qingdao has22.41public busesper10,000capita.ThisratioishigherthanShanghai,Wuhan,Tianjin,andGuang zhou wherecitizen’saveragepercapitaincomeishigherthaninQingdao.(Huang,J.,2002) ThisperformanceislargelytheresultofthejointventurereformofQingdao’s formerBus Transportation company, which was divided into “Gongjiao Group” and “Jiaoyun Group”, eachrunsindependentlyfromoneanother.In2000,thecityofQingdao ceasedthefinan cial allowanceforthebusservice,andin2001thegovernmentbegan toearnhighprofit fromthetwobusgroups– thetaxpaidbytheGongjiao Groupamountedtocirca42million RMBinthisyear.InQingdao’s urbanareawith2.4millioninhabitants,thesumofBusID Cardssurpassed1million,whichshowspeople’shighrelianceonthecity’sbussystem.The market competition brings the people the convenience and efficiency which they have neverexperiencedbefore.

49 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Nameof Population Sumof Lengthof Drivenlength Sumof Averagesum the city ofthecity public bus (10,000 passengers per100,000 (Million) buses network buskm ) (100,000 ) inhabitants (km )

Beijing 747 13,183 2,662 52,526 351,900 23.98

Dalian 270 3,530 266 12,810 109,101 18.11

Shanghai 970 16,369 1,972 102,695 246,434 19.46

Wuhan 434 5,706 716 37,970 86,980 17.19

Guangzhou 425 4,451 806 33,653 113,518 16.94

Nanjing 287 2,666 775 14,019 92,633 12.09

Chongqing 635 3,250 1,757 18,607 66,380 9.60

Tianjin 529 4,361 1,876 21,292 55,061 9.81

Jinan 229 1,611 1,060 6,213 40,519 9.29

Qingdao 260 2,844 771 11,001 45,966 22.41

Tab.21BusTrafficStatisticofSeveralChineseMajorCities (Year2000)

Fig.211 Presentandpastof the HongKongRoad

50 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

2.5 Summary

TheongoingdevelopmentofQingdao’s urbanspaceislargelyaresultof thestrong economic growth of the city. Firstly, being one of the 14 officially chosen “coastal open cities” since 1984, foreign investment and the successoflocalenterprises(suchas Haier Electronics and Qingdao Beer, etc.) have strongly promoted the city’s economy; the GDP increasedmorethan10%onaverageannuallysincetheendofthe 1980’s.Thus,thecity hasmuchmorefinancialcapacityforurbanconstruction.Inaddition,thegovernmentalso attemptstoimproveitsurbancompetitivenessthroughappealingurbanenvironments,es pecially through“flagshipprojects” – likethelandscapingofDonghai Road,thebuildingof the“EastWestExpressLine”,etc.Secondly,themarketorientedreforminhousing,traffic, etc.hasimprovedbothefficiencyandcreativityinurbanconstructionandmanagement;and theleasingsystemofurbanland thegovernmentsells the usingrights of land through auction bringsnewfinancialresourcestoinfrastructureandpublicfacilityconstruction.For example,withsuchresourcesthegovernmentwasabletoadequatelyfinancetheinfrastruc ture oftheneweasternareaofabout100sqkm inthe1990’s.Besidestheeconomicfactor, Qingdao’s urbanconstructionhasalsobeenpromotedbythespecialculturalfactor:thehigh aestheticqualityofQingdao’solddowntownandthenewculturalinfluencesinthiscoastal cityprovidecitizenswithhighexpectationsandenthusiasmtowardstheirlivingenvironment.

Inbrief,thegovernmentandthemarkethavebeenthemajorpromotersofQingdao’s urbanenvironmentsince1978.The“government marketmechanism” ofplanning,which canbebrieflydescribedas“thegovernmentformulatesthetargetandrealizeitwiththe market”,hasshownitsgreatcapacity.

Thefollowingchapterwilldiscussthequestions,namely,doesthismechanismalsohas problems?AndwhichdeficiencieshavemanifestedinQingdao’s urbanenvironment?

51 52 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

2. TheprogressofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

City hall NowPlanned Residential area Harbor Public-used area Airport Industrial area Power plant Storage area Transformer substation Intercity traffic Water works Urban traffic & Square Sewage farm Infrastructure area Garbage disposal plant Green area Heat supply Special use Drainage system Water surface Border of urban precinct Railway Border of planning area

Fig.212MasterPlanofQingdao 19952010

53 CentreoftheneweasternareaandtheMay4thSquare 54 55 56 Part I. The progress and deficit of the development of Qingdao’s urban space

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’s contemporaryspatialdevelopment

57 58 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

3. The deficit of Qingdao’s contemporary spatial development

ThischapterpresentsthefourdeficienciesofQingdao’s spatialdevelopment:housing, heritageprotection,publicspace,andurbantraffic,thoughinrealitytheseaspectsareoften interwoven.HenriLefebvreargues,“Spaceispermeatedwithsocialrelations;itisnotonly supported by social relations, but it is also producing and produced by social relations.” (Lefebvre,H.,1979,pp.295)Inthefollowing,thespatialphenomenaaswellastherelated socialprocessesinQingdao sincethemarketorientedreformwillbediscussed.

3.1 Urban housing

ResolvingthehousingpressureinmodernChinesecities,especiallyinthemegacitiesin theeasternregion,isalengthyandhighlycomplicatedprocess. TheexperienceofChina andmanyothercountriesshowsthatthehousingproblemscannot beeasilyresolvedonly throughgovernmentalsupply.InQingdao,thehousingmarkethascontributedmuchinim proving the housing situation, however, contradictions are emerging during this process, whichmainlyconcerntheresettlementconflictandthespatialdifferentiation.Suchcontra dictionshavebeencontinuouslydeepeningsincethe1990's.

3.1.1 Resettlement conflict Theresettlementconflictmeanstheconflictsbetweentherenewalconcernedresidents andthehousingdeveloper eithertheindependentrealestatecompanyorthegovernmen tal institutions.Suchproblemshaveaccompaniedthe“monetarycompensationpolicy” since thebeginningof1990'sinQingdao.Inthe1980's,withthe“ResidenceCompensationPolicy”, mostoftheresidentsacquirednewresidencesaftertheirrenewal,thustherenewalrelated conflictswereverylimited.Whereasafterthe1980's,asmentionedbefore,themainbodyof thedevelopingcompanies is nomorethepublicowned but marketoriented corporations, whiletheoriginalresidentsgetmonetarycompensationinsteadofresidence.Theyaread vocated topurchasehousingthemselves.Meanwhile,themarketpriceofhousinghasbeen rapidlyrising,especiallythosesitedinfavoriteplacesinthe oldcityorintheneweastern area. On one hand, the government hopes to increase the housing supply and eliminate slumsbymeansoflargescaled renewal in the old city and by constructing new housing areas;ontheotherhand,throughleasingtheusingrightsofurbanlandtorealestatede velopers,thecityacquiresanimportantresourceofrevenue.

59 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Manyresidentsintheareastobedemolishedhavefeelingsofbothexpectationandfear regardingremoval.Formany,theupdateofthegovernmentalcompensationstandardisra ther lowandthereisahugegapbetweenthecompensationpriceandtheboomingmarket price.Itisverydifficultformanylowincomehouseholdstoaffordthesaleorrentpricefora newresidenceattheirformersite,andtheyhavetoresettlein marginalareasofthecity. Thatmeansthattheymightlosetheirfavoriteaccesstowork,besubjecttoincreasedtraffic costsandabandoncertainplacerelated“socialcapital” (Bourdieu,P.),whichbuiltupover decades.BothinurbanandsuburbanareasofQingdao,theconflictsbetweentherenewal concernedresidentsandthedevelopersaregettingserious.

Taketherenewalof “BlockNo.18” northofSt.MichaelCathedralforinstance.Withan areaof18,936sqm ithadseveralEuropeanstyledvillasandCourtyardhouseswithstores anddepots.TheapprovedrenewalplanofZhongshan Road’sneighborhoodwouldbecom pletely reconstructedintoapartofthefuture“CulturalRecreationZone”.Accordingtothe official compensation standard, the residents were paid 3,450 RMB/sqm for their original housingacreage,whilethemarketpriceforaresidencebuiltbefore1999wasover5,000 RMB/sqm,andforaresidencebuiltin1990'swas6,000to8,000RMB/sqm.Inotherwords, iftheresidentsofthisareawantedtobuynewhousesofthesamesizeattheformerplace, they hadtopayan additional 3,000 to 4,000 RMB for each sqm. In this situation many residentsrefusedtocooperatewiththerenewal,buttheyhadnotenoughstrengthtostop thedeveloperormakeamorefavoritecompromise.Startingfromthebeginningofthere newal in2003,theoriginalresidentshavenotceasedtheirprotest.

AnothercaseconcernsaprojectinXiaobaodao area.Therenewalareacovers46,115 sqm andtherightofusewassoldthroughauctionin2002.Forthenewplanof180,000 sqm housingandcommercialacreage,2000originalhouseholdsmustberesettledand400 householdslivingfromfacadestoreshadtofendforthemselvesinotherways.Thisplanled toprotestsinthestreetandinfrontofthecityhall.

IntheformalindustrialorienteddistrictsinthenorthofQingdao,therehavealsobeen similarcases.AccordingtoChinaEconomicWeekly,insummer2003manyresidentsofSi fangsuddenlyfoundtheirresidencespulleddownwhencamehomefromwork,whilethe developershadnokindofagreementwiththeseresidents.[45]

Let’sswitchourfocustothesuburb.IntheformerruralpartsofQingdao’s neweastern

60 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

area,thepeasantswholosttheirlandduetonewdevelopmentprojectsarenottheminority. Forexample,mostlandofJinjialing villagewasrelocatedforrealestatepurposes.Thevilla ger Mawanqi has2sons;bothofthemworktemporarilyinthecity,andtheirwivesstayat home jobless. He mentions, “People over 55 years of age get 300 RMB living allowance everymonthandpeopleover60havesociallaborinsuranceof600RMBpermonth.Having lostland,villagerscanonlyarrangeforlimitedjobssuchascaringforthegreeneryorclean ing thestreets.Villagersunder55yearsofagehavetomakeanew living.Withoutland,we losethefoundationofoursubsistence.NowIam50anddonotneedtoworryaboutmyfu ture.Buthowaboutournextgenerations?Therearealreadysomanyjoblesspeopleinthe city, where can our people find jobs there?” [46] After losing the land, a woman of the Wangbu villageofLicang Districtcommittedsuicideduetopsychologicalstress,andlefther 4yearoldsonbehind.AvillagerfromNanzhai villagetoldthejournalist:“Afterthelandwas takenawaybydevelopers,peasantshavetoclimbto the mountain and smash stones to makealiving.Thentoprotecttheenvironment,suchworkisforbiddenbythegovernment andthepeasantslosttheirmonetaryresourceagain.Thentheonlywayforusistolookfor somechancesinthecity… Wewerefedbyourlandfromgenerationtogeneration.Though wecangetfromoneMu oflandonlyseveralhundredRMBeachyear,thelandisourlifeline. Now,alllandhasbeenconfiscated,howcanweliveinthefuture?Isthistherightwayof sacrificingthepeasantsforthedevelopingofthesociety?” [47]

Mostofthelandalongtheseashoreinwasdevelopedintoavillaarea, andsomeofthemarequitewelcomeonthemarket.However,somedevelopers,whocare exclusively fortheirprofit,makethebuildingdensityinsuchcommunities sohighthatthey cannotsellthematall.Intheneweasternareaitisnotdifficulttofindthe“deadreales tates” somebankruptinvestorstrytosellthelandwithallcompleted villastothenewde velopers,somehaveevenfledabroad.Thefinishedbuildingsareeitherdemolishedorstay ing therelikeghosthousesforyears.(Liu,C.,2003,pp.53)Prof. Xu ofTechnologicalUni versity ofQingdao arguesthatthelargeamountofvacantvillasresultfromtheexorbitant profitpursuitbyboththedevelopersandthegovernment.[48]In 2004,overhundredvillas of “Blue Sea”, “Eastern Pearl” and “Edinburgh Garden” are pulled down and replaced by multilayerapartmentbyanewdeveloper,attractinggreatattentionfromcitizensandmedia. AsProf.Xu alsomentions,withthedramaticriseofcostallandandhousingpriceduetothe WaterRegattaofOlympicGamesinQingdao in2008,notonlytherealestatecompanywho boughtthelandanddismantledtheoldhousing,butalsothecompanywhobuiltsuchvillas willmakegreatprofitfromthemarket.

61 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Thosewholostmostduringthe housing constructionfeverinthe formerlyruralarea areoriginalpeasants,whoworkoutsideorstayjoblessathome. Accordingtoareportof Xinhua Agency,theofficialnewsagencyofChina’scentralgovernment,upto2005thepea sants wholosttheirlandamountedto397,000inQingdao’s administrativearea.[49]

Fig.31DestructionofgatedcommunitiesinQingdao’s southerncostalarea

3.1.2 Spatial differentiation At present, the differentiation of people’s economic status increasingly influences the geographic distribution of their housing in Qingdao. Before the end of the 1980's the government or the publicowned enterprises “Dan Wei” (Chinese: 单位) were the only institutionswhichdistributedurbanhousing.Mosturbancommunitiesconsistedofmembers whoworkedinthesameenterprisealthoughthesocialorpoliticalstatusoftheresidents might vary. Since the 1990's the real estate development companies, which were mostly publicownedbuthaverecentlybecomeeconomicallyindependent,arenow themaininstitu

62 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

tions supplyinghousingonthemarket.Theresidentsofthenewcommunities,astheresult, arenomore fromthesame“DanWei” butgenerallyhavesimilareconomicstatus.Through housing consumption and relocation of residents due to renewal projects, the economic differentiation of urban inhabitants is gradually shown by the geographical allocation of housing.InQingdao,theincreasingdifferentiationoftheurbanenvironment seemstohave beenpartofthedailyexperience, andnumerousgatedcommunitiesareformedintheareas wherepeoplewithmiddleincomeandhigherincomeareconcentrated.

ThegatedcommunitiesfirststartedtoappearinQingdao intheearly1990's,alongwith thedevelopmentoftheneweasternarea.Atthattimemostofthesewerevillaprojectswith onlyafewstories,andpackeddenselyalongtheseashore.Today theyareeasilytobefund inmanyurbanareas,coveringabroadvarietyofhousingtypes.Intheeasternnewarea, theyhaveevenformedanapproximatelycontinuousinterfacealongthecoastwithalength ofseveralkilometers.Thegatecommunityisnotonlythechoiceofpeoplewhoareof high income, but also favored by middleincome consumers. Also, the purchasers of these projectsarenotonlyfromQingdao butalsofromothercities.

Thephenomenonof“gatedcommunities” todayisnotonlyareturntoChina’shousing tradition. Firstly, with the increase of unemployment in the city and the enormous gap betweentherichandthepoor,people’sfearofsocialtensionsandcriminalitygrows.Se condly, people need a reliable neighborhood somewhatsimilartothattheold“Dan Wei” communities provided before. Thirdly, the quality of residential environments has deterioratedlargelyduetorapidgrowthofurbantraffic and population, so welldesigned gatedhousingareasareverywelcomeonmarket.Lastbutnotleast,thecultureinfluenceof theUSAhasplayedademonstrativeroleinthepublicconsciousnessofbeing“fashionable” orbeing“modern”.(Hassenpflug,D., 2004,pp.36)

ThespreadofgatedcommunitieshasalreadyshownhugenegativeeffectsinQingdao. While the security situation of communities’ internal space is improved, streets between communities often turn into “residual spaces”. The streets around the villa areas in Qingdao’s easthaveverylimitedpedestriansinthedaytime,whileatnightsometurninto “scary” spacesformanypeople.AccordingtoJaneJacobs,whenthestreetlosesitssocial life,themonitoringfunctionsofthesurroundingbuildingsandpeople– shecalledit“eyes onthestreet” areblockedthusthechancesforcrimeand people’s feeling of insecurity wouldgrow.(Jacobs,J.,2000,pp.114125)Duetotheseparationofspace,thefreedomof

63 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

pedestrians is highly restricted, and it is often inconvenient for residents both inside and outsideofthecommunitiestousepublictraffic.Asaresult,thegatedcommunitiesstimulate thegrowthofprivatevehiclesandincreasethepressureontheexistingtrafficinfrastructure ofQingdao.

Withtheestablishmentof the housingmarket, Qingdao’s government has also made manyeffortsinconstructingalargeamountofeconomicalresidenceswithrealestatedeve lopers initsnorthdistrictsandtheperipheryareasofthecity,especiallysincethesecond halfof1990's.In2004,morethan7,000familieswereresettled into634,000sqm finished “economical housing”.[50] On one hand, this measure helps improve the “hard” housing conditionsliketheresidentialacreage,thesanitaryinfrastructureandsoonformanypeople withmiddleorlowincome;ontheotherhand,ithasalsogreatlydeepenedthespatialdif ferentiation ofsocialmembers,togetherwiththeincreaseofthegatedcommunities. Beyond that,althoughthe“economicalhousing” issoldforarelativelylowerpriceduetogovern mentalsubsidy,thepriceisstilltoohighformany of the lowincome or unemployed city inhabitants.

Fig.32 Gated communities andthe street spacein Qingdao’ssuburb

64 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Inbrief,Qingdao’s prevailinghousingsupplymode,inwhichthegovernmentleasesthe landandthemarketprovidescommercialhousing, leadsto increasingresettlementrelated conflicts and spatial differentiation despite its positive performances. This mode does not contributemuchtothemajorityofthelowersocial stratumtogetthe housingthat they expect,andinmanycases,itwouldevenworsenthelivingsituationofthedisadvantaged, andimposenegativeeffectsontheintegrationoftheurbansociety.

3.2 Heritage Preservation

Historic buildings and districts contribute much to people’s perception of a city and make it unmistakable. (Lynch, K., 1967, pp.10) In the era of globalization, the historical environmentisanimportantfactorforattractingprofessionals, investors,touristsandcon sumers toacity,thusplaysanimportantrolefortheurbancompetitiveness.Sincethecon struction boominQingdao,manyprojectshavenotproperlynoticedsuchcontext,andmany “barriers” ofthecollectivememoryofcitizenshavebeenremovedorstronglydestroyed.

3.2.1. Historic building In1988,Qingdao’s railwaystationbuildingalongwithits“Jugendstil” platform,which wasconstructedintheGermancolonialperiod,was removedanda newstationwiththe sameformbutalargerdimensionwasbuiltonthesamesite.Thishasseriouslydestroyed theauthenticityofthetraditionalenvironment.Suchkindofreconstructionhasalsohappen edintherenewalprojectsoftheKangYouwei Museum(formerAdjutant’sHouse,finishedin 1900),theJiangsu LuPrimarySchool(formerGermanSchoolforBoys,finishedin1901)and Qingdao FoodStore(formerHamburgAmericaLinePremisesbuilding,finishedin1904).

Besides the “replacement with fakes”, many more historic buildings were completely removedfornewrealestateprojects,ofwhichtheinfluentialonesare:

The Sommer Hotel, one of the representative buildings in Zhongshan Road (former FriedrichStreet),finishedin1912andremovedin2004; TheQingdao MiddleSchoolforGirls,donatedbytheBusinessmanLiuZishan,finished in1920andremovedin1992; TheSmallHarbor’sCustomOfficeBuilding,thetowerofwhichwasthelandmarkforthe neighboringarea,finishedinthe1920'sandremovedin2004;

65 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Qingdao CivilStadium,oneoftheearliestconcretesteelstructure stadiums in China, finishedin1933andremovedin2002; Huaqiao Hotel,oneofthefewmodernstylearchitecturesonthelistofthemostimpor tant historicbuildingsoftheShandongProvince,finishedin1936andremovedin2005.

Fig.33 The wellpreservedoldRailwayStation(insetright)relacedbythisfake(above)

Also, the traditional “Liyuan” houses are also increasingly endangered by the con struction boomintheinnercity.First,abriefintroductionof“Liyuan” isnecessary.Liyuan is alocalarchitecturaltypecombinedfromthetraditionalChinese yardhouseandtheEuro pean block residence in Qingdao. While the facade adopts both the European and the Chinese decorations, the orientation, the entrance and the spatial hierarchy reflect the stronginfluenceoftheculturalidentityofnorthChina.TheLiyuan houses,whichwerebuilt bytheformerelitesofChina’sQing Dynasty,showhighaestheticand historicvalue. The Liyuan housingprovidesvariousspatialpossibilitiesforneighborhood communications;the inner yards, which were traditionally reserved for family life, have turned into the “living room” for all residents and the made a community unmistakable from the others. The numerous Liyuan houses, like the “Linong” in Shanghai or “Lifang” in Tianjin, are an

66 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

adaptationoftheChineseresidentialcultureinaEuropeanstyledurbanstructure.(Liu,C., 2004,pp.144)TheyareaspecialcomponentofQingdao’s pluralizedarchitectural culture; andtheyalsocontributestronglytothe“collectiveidentity” ofQingdao’s inhabitants.Since thebeginningofthe21stcentury,theoldLiyuan housesinXiaobaodao areaandtheSmall Harbour areahavebeencompletelyreplacedbycommercialprojects.

DuringtheremoveoftheLiyuan housesoftheXiaobaodao area,ananonymouscitizen wroteinaninternetforum,“…itisalllookslikeanancientwarehouse,leavinganoldbut wonderfulpictureforyoutofindwhenyouwipeoffthethickdustleftbyyears,butfinally youhavetogiveitup.Theworkerswavedtheirheavyhammers,andsmashedallofthisin topieces...Maybetheirexistenceisintolerablewhenthehistoryprogressedandlifedevelop ed?” [51] During the demolishment of Liyuan houses in the Small Harbor area, citizens initiatedaprocessofdocumentingtheoldhousingthroughphotographs.Theyputupthe pictureseriesontheinternettitled:“watchsmallharbour wordless” and“collectthehistori calmemoriesofsmallharbour”,etc.

Fig.34 RemainingLiyuanhousingfaceschallengesfromrealestatedevelopment

3.2.2 Historic area Besides the replacement of historic buildings, many renewal projects have also des troyed thedimension,texture,skyline,etc.,ofQingdao’s historicareas.

67 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

a.Scale Fromtheendof19thcenturyuntiltheCulturalRevolutionin1966,thearchitectureof innercityincludesdiversifiedstyles,butthearchitectsandplannerswellcontrolledthescale ofthebuildingswellandmaintainedtheharmoniouscitylandscape.Duringtherecenttwo decades,althoughsomenewcommercialbuildingsattempttocommunicatewiththeexis tingarchitecturethroughsomedetails,theirhugevolumehasstronglyimpactedthetradi tional scaleofthehistoricquarters.Suchaphenomenonisespecially seriousinthesouth ofQingdao’s oldcentralstreetZhongshan Road(Liu,C.,2003,pp.54)

Fig.35 HighriseinQingdao’s historicinnercity

68 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

b.Texture Thelayoutofabuildingincontextwithitsneighboringarchitecture, naturalenviron ment,andcitizen’sbehaviorareoftenthekeyelementsformingacity’sunmistakabletex ture.ThetextureofQingdao’s olddowntownareawaswellformedduetotherespecttothe surroundingenvironmentinarchitecturaldesignas wellasthedensityand heightcontrol throughthegovernmentalplanninginthepast.However,increasingnumbersofnewgiants dramatically changes the existing context between buildings, the external space and the dailyfunction. The newsituationputsforwardthe newdemandsfortransportation, sani tation andparking,whicharefarbeyondtheenvironmentalcapacitypossessedbytheold structure.Thepursuitofhighcommercialacreagehasresultedinthedeteriorationofthe wholeexternalspaceofQingdao’s downtownarea.

Fig.36Thehistoricinnercitydramaticallychangedbynewgiants

c.Skyline DuringtheconstructionofoldQingdao,theplannersandarchitectshadrespectedthe silhouetteofthecoastline,combiningthemintothecharacteristicskylineofthe city.Before 1970's, as five landmarks, the St. Michael Cathedral, the Catholic Church, the St. Paul Church,thePoliceOfficeBuildingandtheObservatory Towerstoodoutof this curvilinear skylineandidentifieddifferentquarters.Theybringpeoplebothaestheticsandorientation,

69 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

andtheyarestilltheessentialelementofthecity’simage.Untilthebeginningof1980's,the fivestored“Wu Lou” (Chinese: 五起楼)builtin1930'swasthehighestbuildingpermitted tobeconstructedintheQingdao’s commercialcenter,theZhongshan Roadarea.Butnow, manynewbuildingsaredesignedtocompetewitheachotherinheightortobethe“new symbols” ofacertaininstitution,andtheyhavedestroyedtheaestheticsofthetraditional skylineandusuallyblockthewelldesignedvisualconnectionsamongtheoldlandmarksand thenaturallandscape.

d.Colour Redfromthetiles,yellowfromthefacades,greenfromthetreesandbluefromthesea formthedominantcolorsofQingdao,whichbringsadelightfulatmospheretopeople.Com paredtothecolorofmanycitiesinGermany,especiallythe cities rebuilton theruins of WorldWarIIina“modern” way,thecolorofQingdao’s oldcityhaveanevenstrongerartis ticappeal.However,thischaracteristicisbeingendangeredbytheplanningofthenewcon structions.Thecopyofoneortwohousingunitsmakesmanyresidentialareasa“machine made” appearance,althoughQingdao’s governmenthasadvocatedtheredroofforhousing since 1990's. Also, the increase of building density in the old city reduces or blocks the limited green areas in the landscape. At the beginning of the 1990's, the sidewalk trees alongtheZhongshan Roadaboutonehundredyearsoldwerefelledforthesakeofaso called“imageproject”,whichmakeitdifficultforthecitizensandvisitorstofindshadeinthe ferventsummer.Besides,sometraditionalgreenbeltsalongthestreetandintheparksare replacedbypavements,thusthe“green” inthehistoricquartersbecameevenscarcer.

Thoughthegreatachievementhasbeenattainedintheworkonheritagepreservation inQingdao,atpresentthestrengthforpreventingthehistoricenvironmentfrombeingde stroyed isstillnotsufficient.ActuallymanypreservationattemptsmadebyQingdao’s go vernment werenotrealizedforfinancingororganizationreasons.Forinstance,thegovern ment invited several prominent architectural offices including Fritz Hubert Architektur + Stadtplanung fromGermanyandCommonwealth/ICSCfromCanadaforthepreservationand revitalization of the Zhongshan Road area. Their concepts for carefully maintaining the existingoldarchitectureandsocialstructurewerenotrealized largelyduetothelackofsta ble governmental investment. The increase of economic benefit is easily established in a shorttermthroughthecooperationofthedevelopersandgovernment,butthelostcultural valuecouldbehardlyregainedforthecity’sfuture.

70 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

3.3 Public Space

Thenecessaryfunctionsofurbanpublicspacesregardlessofculturaldifferencesareto servepeople’sleisureandcommunication,tofacilitatetheintegrationoftheurbansociety, aswellastoenhancepeople’saccesstopublicresources,etc.WhileQingdao’s publicspace hasbeenhighlypromotedwithregardtoitsqualityandquantity,somedeficiencies,inclu dingtherestrictionofaccessandthedeteriorationofthenaturalenvironment,haveaffected itsvalueforpeople’severydaylife.

3.3.1 Access restriction Public spaces should be freely accessible for the public regardless of people’s traits, origins,andeconomicorsocialstatus.InChina,theyareoften theplaceswheremanylow incomeurbaninhabitantsorlaborimmigrantsmakealivingthroughopenairretail.However, restrictionsduetoentrancefeesforparks,gatedcommunities,etc.excludemanycitizens fromQingdao’s pubicspaces.

Zhongshan ParkandZhushui Park,thetwomajorurbanparkswithrespectively20.18 haand18.54haarea,chargeticketsonaregularbasisfortheirmaintenance.TheLuxun ParkandtheZhanqiao PierPark,thetwolargeopenspacesalongthesoutherncoastal area, are surrounded with fences and charge fees for entering seasonally. The ticket for the Zhongshan Parkcosts10RMBinmidseason,andduringthecherry’sblossomperioditis increasedto12RMB.Suchapricemightequalahalfday’ssalaryoroneday’slivingcosts formanylabor immigrants in Qingdao. A resort sited to the west of the nationalfamous No.1 Bathing Beach, Luxun Park has few visitors because most people choose to make a detourratherthantopayadmissionandwalkthrough.

Whilethefeechargedbymanyurbanparksbeforethe1980'swasonly“symbolic” for mostpeople,ithasturnedintoanobstacleforthelowincomeorunemployedcitizensinthis city.Statistics showthattheunemployedofQingdao totalled 68,534bytheendof2002, witha9.0%increasecomparedwiththatin2001,andtherewere27,965inhabitantsliving under extreme poverty. Also, the sum of temporarily working immigrants amounted to 795,400bytheendof2002,witha20.1%increase compared with that in 2001.[52] In reality,mostofthelaborimmigrantsarefacedwiththeproblemsoflackingleisurelifeapart fromtheirhardworkingconditions,insufficienthealthinsurance,andinsufficienteducation access for their kids, etc. The entrance fee which is not expensive for the middleincome

71 Part1.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

mightbeunaffordablefortheunemployedandthelaborimmigrants.Ifsomeparksbecome “gentrified” places,filteringoutthelowersocialstratum,theywouldalso losetheirintegra tive valuefortheurbansociety.

UndergroundEntranceofthePier

ZhongshanRoad

ThePier

Fig.37 FencedZhanqiao PierParkand its underground entrance

Forthepastfewyears,Shanghaihasmademanyeffortstoexpand accessibilitytoits parksandotherpublicspaces.TheXujiahui Park,theYanzhong GreenbeltandthePeople’s Squareallhavebecomefreelyaccessibleplaceswithoutfences.Intheseparks,peoplefrom diversebackgroundswalk,communicate,relax,orread.Theseparkshavebecomeanim portant partofmanycitizens’ dailylives.

Since1949,publictaxationhasbeentheonlyeconomicresourceforthe construction andmanagementofurbanpublicspaceinChina.Thus,thepossessorsofpublicspaceare allthecitizens,andtheyalsoincluderuralinhabitantswhohavealwayssupportedtheurban developmentdue tothe cityprioritydistributionpolicyofthe nation.SimilartoShanghai, Qingdao hasalsomadesomeeffortsforincreasingaccessibilitytoparksinrecentyears.The Cangkou Parkhascanceleditsentrancefee,whichitchargedinthepast.Moreover,new sportequipmenthasbeeninstalledanda“children’sfairyland” hasbeenadded.In2004,the Shibei DistrictGovernmentbuilttheCuobuling LeisureParkof4,000sqm openingforfree.If allQingdao’s majorparksandresorts“lowertheirthresholds”,theywillbebetterableto presenttheirvalue.

72 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Besidestheentrancefeeofsomeparks,thespreadingofgatedcommunitiesisanother importantfactorrestrictingthepublicaccessibility oftheurbanenvironment.Whilealmost eachtraditionalvillaareaisaccessibleforpeopleintheoldcity,manynewlybuiltcommuni tiesoccupytheenvironmentwithintheirfencesastheirown.Withthegrowthofsuchspa tial exclusion,thedailycommunicationbetweendifferentsocialstratawouldbemuchre duced.Misunderstandingduetolackofdailycommunicationmightleadstoprejudiceand instabilityofthe society. Havingrealizedtheproblems caused by the gated communities, Shanghai’s government is financing a research project at the Tongji University to find a realisticsolution.[53]

Badaguan Villaarea,aresidentialareaformerlyfor highofficials,successfulbusiness men and professionals in 1930's and 1930's, presents a quite different concept of urban publicspace.Outoftheyardofhouses,allplaces– thestreets,thegreenarea,thewoods andthebeachesareopentoallpeople,formingacontinuousbeltofopenspacealongthe coast.Inthe1930's,thebuildingregulationoftheNationalist governmentalsorequirethat allhousesmusthave40%greenarea,andthatyardfencesshallenablethevisualrelation shipbetween housesand publicenvironment.Now, ithasalreadybeenalocalcustomin Qingdao thatpeoplecometoBadaguan toenjoy the cherry blossoms with their families during the May 1st holiday. Such an open space concept is originated in Europe. In the Europeancities,manywellknownpublicspacesare sitedinsideoraroundthehistorically “gentrified” residentialareas,likeHeidelberg’snorthernNeckar bankwhichisespeciallyliked bytheuniversitystudents.ThepoemofFritzLöhnerBeda andErnstNeubach,“I'dlostmy heartinHeidelbergforever.MyheartstillbeatsonNeckar's shore” hasbeenspreadworld wide;itisalsointerpretedbythepopstarElvisPresley.

3.3.2 Ecologic function Fromanecologicalstandpoint,thenaturalwatersystem,greenbelt,wetland,etc.areof essentialvalueforthelivingqualityofacity.Theexistenceofthenaturallandscapeamong thecementandsteelcannotonlybalancepeople’sstrain,butalsoofferchildrenchancesof touching nature and acquiring biological knowledge. Nowadays, Qingdao’s has lost many opportunitiesinrestoringandimprovingitsnaturalenvironment.

Sincethe1990's,Qingdao hasmademanyeffortstowardsrevitalizingthenaturalwater system,ofwhichpartshavebeenbadlypollutedbyindustrialor wastedrainage,anditis

73 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

amajormeasuretocoverthewatercoursewithconcrete,stoneor cement.Therevitalization projectsareusuallyverycostly,andtheresultasindicatedby thewaterqualityandthe ecosystemarenotsatisfying.TaketheHabo RiverParkasanexample.Sincetheriverbank andriverbedarecoveredbyhardsurfaces,mostanimalsandplantscannotliveintheriver anymore.Theriverdoesnothavetheselfpurificationcapacityandcleanwaterdeteriorates again.Inaddition,theplanningoftheHaipo RiverParkhasnoteffectivelycopedwiththe wastewatermanagementoftheneighboringchemicalplant,market andcommunities.After thecompletionofthisprojectthecontaminationispouredintotheriveragain.

Fig.38TheconcretebankoftheHaipoPark

In1938,Alwin Seifertsetforth thenatureorientedapproach“Naturnäherer Wasserbau” forrepairingandregulatingthewatersystemaffectedbyurbanizationandindustrialization (Seifert. A., 1938). In 1989, WilliamJ. Mitsch addressed “Ecological Engineering” and proposedmutuallybeneficialcoexistenceofhumanswithnaturethroughtheconstruction ofnaturelikewetlands,watercourses,etc.(Mitsch,W.J.,1989)Mitsch hasalsoestablished the12haOlentangy RiverWetlandResearchParkforwetlandresearchandeducation, and was awarded the “Stockholm water prize” in 2004. Over the last two decades, various

74 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

natureorientedmeasureshavebeenwidelyadoptedintherenovationand leisuredevelop ment oflakes,rivers,marshes,mines,forests,landandseabanksinmanydevelopedcoun tries. In the 1990's, Germany renovated Emscher river region, formerly a highly polluted areaby,intoaparkwithnaturallandscapeandamodernartvenue.Thejointeffortsofthe publicandtheprivatesectorswiththecoordinationofIBAmade thispossible.(IBA,1999; Hassenpflug,D.,2005)

In contemporary Western Europe, the natureoriented approach is widely adopted in theplanningofmanmaderiversorstreamstoo.The“pastoralstream” inKirschsteigfeld of Potsdam(Architect:Krier&Kohl)completelyutilizesnaturalsoilasawatercourse,sothatthe plants and small animals like frog and cricket living along the stream offer rich natural appeal. The natureoriented approach of natural renovation and development is a multi functionalmeasure.Ithelpsprovidelivingconditionsforpropagation,improvethe natural selfcleaningandantifloodmechanism,andofferspleasantleisurespaceforallthepeople. ItisavaluableinstrumentfortheimprovementofQingdao’s naturalenvironment,andwill contributetothelivingqualityofthecityinthelongrun.

Inshort,althoughtheplanninginQingdao isefficientinexpandingpublicspace,there isstillmuchtoimproveconcerningthediversityanddailyneedsofthepeople.Whilethe actualplanningfocuseswellonthe“hardtargets” likegreenarearatio,particularfunction andsoon,itneedstopromotethecapacityforservingthe“softtargets”,liketheaccessi bility,experientialvalue,andnaturalaffinity,etc.

3.4 Urban traffic

ItisagrandprojectfortherapidgrowingChinesecitiestoestablishanefficienttraffic system,andthisprojectisalsohighlyrelatedtoalargevarietyofissuessuchasenergy, landuse,safety,justiceandsoon.Overthelasttwodecades,althoughthegovernmentof Qingdao hasgivenmanyeffortsinimprovingurbantrafficinfrastructuresandmanagement, the lack of sufficient road capacity and public transportation is still experienced by many peopleindailylife.

3.4.1 Road system In2005,theconstructionlandpercapitainQingdao wasabout88sqm andtheroad

75 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

areapercapitawas15sqm,whichoccupied17%oftheconstructionland.Thisnumberis muchhigherthanmostChinesecitiesincludingBeijing(whichhasaratioof10.4%).How ever,comparedtothedevelopedcountries,thislevelisratherlow.Thedataprovidedby Qian Shaohua fromtheShanghaiUrban Planning and Design Institute indicated that the averageratioofurbanroadsoccupyingthelandwas32.8%inthe U.S.A., inNewYork 35%,inWashingtonD.C.43%andinLosAngelesevenupto50%.Theaveragelevelin Europeisaround21%,withLondon23%,Berlin26%andParis25%. ThelevelinAsian citiesiscomparativelymuchlowerthanthatintheU.S.AorinEurope,forexample,Tokyo has15.2%andOsakahas17.2%.(Qian S.H.,2004)

InQingdao,thereasonwhyurbantraffichasbeenalastingproblemismuchrelatedto theconstantemphasisonzoninginurbanplanningbythecitygovernment.Afterthe1990's, itwasfurtherstrengthenedbythecity’sexpansiontotheneweasternarea.Somescholars believethatthereasonabledistributionofurbanfunctionshasbeenanimportantreasonfor the fast development of Qingdao’s economy in the last century.[54] However, zoning has alsoletmanyurbanresidentsspendmuchlongertimeontheroad,andmadethenorthern partofthecityloseitsattractivenesstocitizensandinvestmentsduetotheinconvenience ofthetrafficsystem.Asearlyasinthe1930's,thegovernmenthadalreadyputforwardan ideathatthecentreofthecityanditsrailwaystationshouldbemovedtotheLotusMoun tain (Chinese: 芙蓉山)inSifang district,whichislocatedinthegeographiccenterofthecity. Todaythisthinkingisstill valuable: because it could not only shorten the average traffic distanceforthecitizens,butalsorelievetheheavytrafficburden,andmostimportantly,it couldhelpchangethelongtermlaggardsituationoftheformerlyindustryorientednorthern partofthecity.

The increasing number of automobiles in Qingdao is a major reason for traffic jams apartfromthelowratioofroadpercapita.Agroupofofficialstatisticsfollows:

Thetotalnumberofautomobilesin2005wasuptomore than 1 million, 170,000 of whichwereprivatecars,whichincreasedby30%comparedtoin2004. Inlate2004,thenumberofprivatecarswasupto 53,000inQingdao’s urbanarea, whichincreasedby47.2%comparedtoin2003. Nowadays,thereareover300citizensonaverageregisteringeverydaytheirnewcars andnearlyevery6thcitizenownsadriver’slicense.ThenumberofautomobilesinQingdao isaveragelyclimbingataratioof13.5%everyyearfrom1996to2005.[55]

76 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

In2005,nearlyoneoutofelevenhouseholdsinQingdao ownedaprivatecar,whilein HongKong,wherepeople’saverageincomeabout12timesasmuchasthatin Qingdao, onlyoneeighthofthefamiliesownprivatecars,andtheannual increaseofprivatecarswas 3.8%onaverageduringthelasttenyearsduetotherestriction measurestakenbythecity government.(Wang,G.C.,2004,pp.35)

Formanyofthehighincomecitizens,“timeismoney”,thustheincreaseofparkingfees andtrafficcontrolcannotpreventthemfromdrivingtheircars. Inaddition,moreandmore suburbancommunitiesadoptenclosedmanagement,andtheirresidentshavetowalkalong distancetoaccessexistingbustrafficsystem,whichformsanimportantfactorstimulating theconsumptionofprivatecars.

Inordertoreducethefrequencyoftrafficjamsandenhancethe speedofvehicleflow, Qingdao’s governmentrequiresthat70%ofallvehiclesshouldbe“highstandard” vehicles bythe2008OlympicGames.Thismeansthatmanyautomobilesinstillgoodconditionbut outdated appearance will not be allowed in the near future. Such measure would very possiblycausethewasteofresourcesandtensionbetweenthegovernmentandthecitizens, whilecontributinglittle to the traffic efficiency if the amount of private cars continues to increaseasfastasitdidinthelastyears.

Thefrequencyoftrafficaccidentsisalsorapidlygrowing.InQingdao from1999to2002, the number of traffic accident related fatalities was 5,321 and the average number was 1,774peryear,whichmakesup0.025%oftheurbanpopulation.However,inJapanin2005, thetrafficaccidentrelatedfatalitieswas0.005%ofitswholeurbanpopulation,aboutone fifthofthatofQingdao.[56]

Withoutcontrolofthelocalauthority,itcanbeforeseenthatthenumberofprivate ownedautomobilesinQingdao willhaveanotherbigjumpduetotheincreaseofpeople’s incomeanddecreaseofcarprices.Thusthecontradictionbetweenthenumberofautomo biles andcapacityoftheroadswillalsobefurtherexpanded.Additionally,thelimitationof spaceinthecityprohibitsunlimitedexpansionoftheroadconstruction.Torelievetheten sion betweencarsandroadsandenhancetheefficiencyofthecity,anymeasurestakenby thecityshouldbebasedonanunderstandingofthecitizens,as wellasfurtherimprovement ofitspublictrafficsystem.

77 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

3.4.2 Public traffic AsearlyasQingdao’s Nationalisticgovernmentperiodfrom1931to1937,peoplehad started considering utilizing rail transit to improve the quality of traffic. Qingdao’s Master Planof1935proposedmovingtheQingdao CentralRailwayStationfromthesouthof the citytotheMainHarbour areaandchangingthefunctionoftheoriginalstationintothe tram terminal.Afterthe1930's,theplanoftramwasabandonedfora longtime.Nowadays,asa citywithmorethan7millioninhabitantsinitsjurisdictionarea,Qingdao stilldoesnothavea railbasedurbantransportationsystem,withpublicbusescarryingabout81%ofthetraffic volume.[57]

Atpresent,alargegapstillexistsbetweentheefficiencyofpublictransportandthe actualneedsofthecitizens.Therearealtogether135publicbuslinesinQingdao’s urban area, most of which are concentrated on the main roads. In the densely populated old districtslikeTaidong andShibei,whereeachmainroadiscoveredby6to10publicbuslines, thebusescanonlyrunataspeedoflessthan 15km/h,evenslowerthanbicycles.

Withtheexpansionoftheurbanarea,manycitizenslivinginthenewlydevelopeddis tricts havetospendmuchtimeintraffic.Forexample,thedistancefromthenewnorthern subcenterofChengyang toQingdao’s newcitygovernmenttotals44kmandittakes6070 minutesbycarwithouttrafficjam;fromthewestendofolddowntowntoeasternShazikou (Chinese: 沙子口) respectively 28.3km and 5060 minutes. (Wang, G. C., 2000) Qingdao NewsinterviewedtheresidentMr.Hu,wholivesintheLoushanhou area(Chinese: 娄山后) inthenorthandworksneartheCentralRailwayStationinthesouth.Hespendsalmost2 hoursinthemorningandintheeveningrespectivelyforcommutingbetweenhisresidence and his work place.[58] The “pendulum effect” of commutingbetweenthenewsuburban residentialareasandtheworkingplacesincreasestheenergyconsumptionandthetraffic pressure.Also,duringthedaytime,manyresidentialareasemptyofcitizens,resultingin fearofcriminality.

Thenewlyfinished“EastWestExpressLine” isanimportantmeasureforenhancingthe trafficbetweentheneweasternareaandtheolddowntown,however,publicbusesarenot allowedtouseitforthereasonthatbusescannotreachsimilarspeedsoftheothervehicles andwouldhinderthetrafficefficiency.Asaprojectfinancedbythepublicbudget,itexclu desnumerouspeoplewhomostlyusepublicbusesfor commuting. The Lincoln Tunnel in New York presents a different concept: since 1971, it established an Exclusive Bus Lane

78 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

(XBL),whichaveragelyshortensallbuspassengers’ commutingtimeby15to20minutes duringthemorningrushhour.(PortAuthorityofNewYork&NewJersey,2005)

´

Fig.39EastWestExpressLineisnotopentobustraffic

Backtorailtransitplanning.In1987,Qingdao’s government reactivated the subway planning.In1994,Qingdao finishedtheexpansionprojectoftheCentralRailStation,trans formingitintoarailwaysubwaydualterminalforthefuture.Thefirstexperimentalsection ofthesubwaywascompletedin1997,anditcost270millionRMB/km,lowerthantheave ragelevelofsubwayprojectsinBeijing,Shanghai,and.(Wang,G.C., 2000)InQingdao’s MasterPlan1995~2010,thelengthofthesubwaynetworktotals114km, andthegovernmenthasalsoplannedondevelopinga16kmlongsection connectingthe northernandthesoutherndistrictsofthecity.Also,inChina’s10thFiveYearPlan(2001 2005),urbanrailbasedmasstransitbelongstothe“keyprojects” forimprovingtheurban infrastructureofthemajorChinesecities.[59]However,Qingdao’s subwayprojecthasbeen instandstillsincetheendofthe1990's,asthemassiverenewalofslumsandthedevelop ment oftheneweasternareawerethemajorplanningtargetsofthecitygovernment.

79 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Asurveywith749questionnairesshowsthatabout84.4%oftheparticipants thinkthat asubwayis“veryimportant” or“important” forthelivingqualityofQingdao’s citizens,and only 6.1% of them regard it as “unimportant” or “inessential”. (Qingdao Social Science Institute,2003)

50 45 40 35 30 25 Percentage of the opion 20 15 10 5 0 very important relatively not inessential important important important

Tab.1 Survey with 749questionnairesonpublicopinionofsubwayinQingdaoin2003

Until now, funding is still a main problem puzzling Qingdao’s government. Since the massrailtransitbelongstolocalpublicutility,thecitygovernmentcanhardlyobtainsuffi cient fundingappropriatedfromChina’scentralgovernment.ExceptforBeijingandShang hai,thesubwayprojectswhicharecompletelyinvestedbythelocal governmentareonlythe No.1LineinShenzhenandtheNo.2LineinGuangzhou.Raisingpersonalandenterpriseca pital toconstructrailwaytransportationisunprecedentedin MainlandChina, while Hong Konghasgatheredvaluableexperiences.InSeptember2000,theRapidTransitRailwayCor poration,ownedbyboththegovernmentandtheprivateinvestors,wasestablishedforbuil dingandoperatingthecity’ssubway.Onthefirstdayofsellingthestocktoraisefunding, citizenssigned2.2millionapplicationforms.In2005,theprofitsformanagingthesubway andexploringthebusinessinvolvedwasatotalsumof1.1billionUSD,whichincreasedby 29%overthatin2001.[60]

80 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

Fig.310ExpansionprojectoftheCentralRailMetroStation, usedasundergroundshoppingstreetatpresent

Inbrief,thetrafficproblemsinQingdao includemainlytheoverloadoftheroadsystem andtheinsufficiencyofthepublictransportationcapacity.Withtheexpansionofthecityand theincreaseofprivatecars,thesetwoproblemswilldeterioratefurther.Dueto the high buildingdensityinmosturbanareas,thepossibilityofimprovingtheroadsystemis very limited,thusaneffectiveapproachforoptimizingthetrafficefficiencyinQingdao shouldbe tobuildrailbasedmasstransportation.However,becauseofthelackoffundingthecityhas topostponeitsmasstransitplan.

81 PartI.TheprogressanddeficitofthedevelopmentofQingdao’surbanspace

3. ThedeficitofQingdao’scontemporaryspatialdevelopment

3.5 Summary

From the deficiencies in urban housing, historic preservation, public space and urban trafficinQingdao,wecanidentifyfourkeyissuesforpromotingQingdao’s planningresults: a.bettercareforthediversifiedinterestofthesocialgroups; b.strongersupervisionof cultural and ecologicaleffects of development; c.moreflexibilityforthecomplexandrapidchangingsituation; d.morepublicbudgetforimprovingpublicfacilitiesandinfrastructure.

Thepresentplanningmechanism– thegovernmentformulatestheplanningtargetand decidesthemeansofdevelopmentwiththemarket– has shown the insufficiency in the planningpracticeofQingdao sincetheimplementationofthereforminChinain1978.The improvementofthestrengthandthedisciplineofboththegovernmentandthemarketwill help overcome such insufficiency and strengthen the city’s capacity in tackling the urban challengesitfaces.

Apartfromthegovernmentandthemarket,istherea“thirdpower”,whichcanbemo bilised andfacilitatedtoimprovetheurbanenvironmentinthiscity?Qingdao’s urbanhistory hasshownthatthe“bottomup” effortshavepositivelyinfluencedurbanplanningindifferent periodsofthecity’sdevelopment,asthethesismentionedinthecasesoftheprotectionof Tianhou Shrine(1912),therevisionofthecity’smasterplan(19321935)andthebuildingof theZhanshan Temple(19331942).Thefollowingchapterswillverifythehypothesisofthis thesis;thattheparticipationofcivilsocietyisabletoimprovetheplanningperformancein thecityofQingdao underpresentcircumstances.

82 83 LabourmigrantsinQingdao 84 85 86 Part II. Civil society’s participation in planning theory and its potential for Qingdao’s planning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slaw andpoliticalstatements

87 88 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

4. Civil society’s participation in planning theory and in China’s law and political statements

Whatdoestheterm“civilsociety” meanintheWest,howshould civilsociety beunder stood in the Chinese context? Whatis civilsociety’s participation in planningtheory,and what arethechancesforthepoliticalacceptance ofsuch participation inChina’s urban planning? Thischapter will givetheanswers.

4.1 The review of the concepts of civil society

Theterm“civilsociety” doesnotexistinthetraditionalglossaryofChineselanguage. In theWest,theconceptofcivilsocietycanbetracedbacktothe GreecephilosopherAristotle. Accordingtohim,thecivilsocietyreferstothecitystate“polis” orthepoliticalstate.(Aristotle, 1965).FortheRomanphilosopherCicero,thenotionofcivilsocietyisrelatednotonlytothe state,buttotheconditionsinacivilizedpoliticalcommunitywithlegalsystemsandcitizens’ participation in social life (Black, A., 1987). Like Aristotle, Cicero also believes that the supremeresponsibilityofcitizensinacivilsocietyistoparticipateinsocialaffairs.Uptothe 18th century, aside from the original GrecoRoman idea of civil society, there were also variousformulationsofthethinkersoftheMiddleAgeandtheAgeofEnlightenment,although civilsocietyalwaysheldthemeaningasthepoliticalsocietywhichisbasedontherepublican systemwhileoppositetothe“naturalsociety”.

Sincethe18thcentury,theideaofcivilsocietyhasbeenstronglyalteredfromwhatit wasbeforeanditalsovariesinliterature(Cohen,J.L.andArato,A.,1994;Keane,J.,1998). Generallytherearefivemajorrepresentativemodelsofacivilsocietyconceptinthisperiod: the “private interest” model of Marx, the “cultural hegemony” model of Gramsci, the “associate democracy” model of Tocqueville, the “autonomous communication” model of Habermas,aswellasthe“socialinteraction” modelofCohenandArato.Inthefollowingthey willbeintroducedbriefly.

1.The“Privateinterest” modelofMarx.ForMarx,civil society is the summation of all private interests’ relationships, including the systems, structures and processes in all non governmentalspheres.Inotherwords,itreferstothe“nonpoliticalsociety”.Inordertomeet individualdemands,peoplebuildupcertaineconomic relationships, social relationships and

89 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

culturalideologicalrelationshipsamongoneanother,andtheserelationshipsformthebasic structureofthecivilsociety.Throughthese relationships, the materialproduction,the so cial integrationandtheculturalreproductionwouldfunctioninfavouroftheinterestofthe rulingclass(Marx,K.andEngels.F.,1846).InEurope,civilsociety,inamodernsense,is based on the social associations’ independence from thestatewhichfirstemergedinthe seventeenthcentury.Marxbelievesthatthesesocialorganisationsarealwaysthefoundation ofthestateandallideologicalsuperstructures.

ThecivilsocietyconceptofMarxhasthefollowingmajorfeatures:Firstly,themodern political state is based on civil society; civil society determines and regulates the state. Secondly,eachindividualhastworoles– heorsheisbothamemberofthepoliticalsociety andamemberofthecivilsociety.Thirdly,civilsocietyisanoutcomeoftheclasssocietyand the differentiation of public interest and the private interest within the class society. He believes,inthebourgeoissocietytheworkingclassisthecarrierofcivility.Accordingtothe utopiantheoryofMarx,thestruggleoftheworkingclasswillleadtoarealcivilsociety– the classlesscommunistsociety.

2.The“Culturalhegemony” modelofGramsci.BasedonMarx’ researchofpoliticaleco nomy,Gramsci arguesthatthecapitalisticstatecanbedividedintotwospheres:thepolitical societyandthecivilsociety.Thepoliticalsocietyreferstothespherecontrolledbythepo litical institutionsandthelegalconstitution;whilethecivilsocietyreferstothecommonly “private” or“nonstate” sphereincludingboththeeconomyandvariousprivateinstitutions likechurches,schools,publicmedia,culturaloracademicorganisations,politicalpartiesand soon.ForGramsci,thepoliticalsocietyisarealmofforceandthecivilsocietyisarealmof consent.Ithelpsmoreorlessmanipulatepeople’smindsandbehaviourandfunctionsasthe reigninginstrumentfortheexistingpowersystems.Also,civilsocietyiswheretherevolution partycouldenabletheworkingclasstodeprivetheoldregimeofideologicalsupportand establishan“alternativehegemony”.Healsoconfessesthatthedivisionofpoliticalandcivil societyisaconceptualmodelandthatthetwooftenoverlapinreality.(Gramsci A.,1971) Gramscibelievesthatpromotingtheselfregulatingabilityofthecivilsocietyanddefining the“witheringawayofthestate” isthehistoricaltaskoftheproletariat.

3.The“Associatedemocracy” modelofTocqueville.Duringthe visitof numerousciti zens’ associationsthroughoutmetropolitanaswellassmallcitiesin theUnitedStatesinthe middle of the 19th century, he was impressed by the country’s rich and prosperous civil

90 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

associations,whichwerenotappreciatedbyEuropeansocietyatthattime.Hearguesinhis “DemocracyinAmerica” (Tocqueville,A.,1998)thatcivilsocietyreferstothe“intermediate” sphereoforganizationsbetweenthestateandtheindividual.Theseorganisationsmayin clude churches,charities,clubs,communitiesandsoon,throughwhichthecitizensvolunta rily participateinsocialaffairs.Citizens’ organisationsreinforcethespiritofthecollaboration inpubliclife;suchcollaborationalsoenhancespeople’shabitsfornonpoliticalformsofco operation.Also, hebelievesthatfreedomaloneis not sufficient to secure the individual’s socialandpoliticalrights.Accordingtohim,anindependentandautonomouscivilsocietyis aninseparableconditionforenablingequalityanddemocracy.Astrongsocialinfrastructure ofvoluntaryorganisations,whicharenotunderthedirectcontrolofthestateinstitutions wouldenablegroupengagementforpoliticalendsandplayanessentialroleinrestricting autarchy.

4.The“Autonomouscommunication” modelofHabermas.In“TheStructuralTransfor mation ofthePublicSphere:AnInquiryintoaCategory of Bourgeois Society”, Habermas regardscivilsocietyasa“privateautonomoussphere” independentfromthestate,andit encompassesthepublicandtheprivatespheres.Theprivatespherereferstothemarket systemformedintheprivateownedmarketeconomy,andthepublicsphereisarealmfor public communication where the state can not intervene. From the study on the social spaceswhereindividualsgatheredtodiscusstheircommonpublic affairsinBritain,France, and Germany in the late 18th and 19th century, Habermas formulates a model of the "bourgeois public sphere" and argues, "it provided a training ground for a critical public reflectionstillpreoccupiedwithitself aprocessofselfclarificationofprivatepeoplefocusing onthegenuineexperiencesoftheirnovelprivateness"(Habermas,J.,1993,pp.29)Forhim, this public sphere, including citizen’s organisations, clubs, public media and other non governmental sociocultural institutions, is grown from and always belongs to the private sphere.(Ibid.,pp.33)Itgivesvoicetosocialproblems,builds commonconcerns,articulates publicinterests,counteracts arbitraryandoppressiveformsofsocialandpublicpower,thus influencingthepoliticalprocessofthestate.Hestates,"Ourinvestigationpresentsastylized pictureoftheliberalelementsofthebourgeoispublicsphereandoftheirtransformationin thesocialwelfarestate"(Habermas,1989,xix). ThetheoryofHabermas helpsbuilda“bi narystructure” (state civilsociety)forsocietaldiscussions.

In“TheTheoryofCommunicativeAction”,Habermas argues that instrumental action takesplacewithinarationalsystem,includingthestate,theeconomy,oranyorganizational

91 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

apparatus, while the lifeworld provides a context in which people can reach a consensus throughautonomouscommunication. Thelifeworld consistsoftherealmoffamilies,hobbies, andsocialgatherings.Thesystemrefersitselfonlytotheinstrumentalrationalitywiththe medium of currency and power. Civil society is highly interrelated with the lifeworld that followscivillogicofunconstraineddiscourse.Habermas believesthatintheWesternsociety theintrusionofinstrumentalactionleadsto“thecolonizationofthelifeworld” bythe sys tem,andtheautonomouscommunicationisfading.Akindofprocedural rationality,inwhich peopleparticipateinpublicaffairs,equalityanddiscourseare onlyinfluencedbythestrength ofargumentsratherthanpoliticalcontrols,andcanbringabout changeinthepublicsphere. Fivekeyrequirementswouldensurethevitalityandtruthofdiscourse:generality,autonomy, idealroletaking,powerneutralityandtransparency.(Habermas,J.,1984)

5.The“Socialinteraction” modelofCohenandArato.AccordingtoCohenand Arato, civilsocietyis“asphereofsocialinteractionbetweeneconomyandstate,composedabove alloftheintimatesphere(especiallythefamily),thesphereofassociations(especiallyvolun tary associations),socialmovements,andformsofpublic communication.Moderncivil so ciety iscreatedthroughformsofselfconstitutionandselfmobilization.Itisinstitutionalized andgeneralizedthroughlawsandespeciallysubjectiverightsthatstabilizesocialdifferentia tion.” (Cohen,J.L.&Arato,A.,1994,ix).Also,CohenandArato believethattheconceptof civilsocietywouldcontributetheglobaldiscourseof political science. They write, “Even if culturalmodernityitselfisjustonetraditionamongmany,itsuniversalthrustisthereflexive, nonauthoritarianrelationtowardtradition anorientationthatcanbeappliedtoitselfand thatimpliesautonomy...ratherthanheteronomy.” (Ibid.,pp.25)

CohenandArato seetheirideaasafurtherdevelopmentofHabermas’ concept.(Ibid., pp.84)Basedonthe“system– lifeworld” discourseinHabermas’ “TheTheoryofCommuni cative Action” andotherworks,CohenandArato arguethatinthecontemporarycapitalistic societytheeconomicsystemhasalreadybeendetachedfrom the civil society and turned intoanindependentsphere.Civilsocietybelongstothe“lifeworld” wherepublicconsensus ismadethroughcommunicationanddialogue.IntherealityofWesternworld,thestateand theeconomyhavethetendencyofcomposinginterventionuponthe autonomyofthe“life world” though mediums like power or money. While in Habermas’ “Private autonomous sphere” modelcivilsocietyincludesnotonlythecitizens’ organisationsandmovementsbut alsothemarketsystembasedonprivateeconomy,CohenandArato proposea“tripartite structure” whichdifferentiatesbetweenstate,economyandcivilsociety.

92 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

State The authority and public Institutions

Econony Civil The market Society The NGO, NPO, community-based organisation, etc . Fig.41 TheTripartiteStructure ofCohenandArato

FollowingtheintroductionofthefivemajormodelsofcivilsocietybyWesternscholars, Iwouldliketoaddressthreepoints:

Firstofall,allthesearetheoreticalmodels– inpractice,theboundariesbetweenthe state,themarket,thecitizens’ organisations,andpublicmediaandsoonareoftencomplex, blurredandevennegotiated.Nevertheless,thesetheoreticmodelsfunctionasinstruments forsocialandpoliticalanalysis,andhavealreadyshownadeep influenceintheacademiaof theWesternworld.

Secondly,thesefivemodels,thoughdifferingmuchfromeachother,arehighlyrelated tothehistoryandrealityofwesternsociety.Inotherwords,theyarethelocalbutnotthe universalknowledge.NoneofthesemodelstouchesorconcernsEasternandChineseculture. As evidence, the influential philosopher on civil society,Jürgen Habermas mentionsinhis speechattheCentralAcademyofChineseCommunistParty“thecommunicationbetweenus isnotsymmetrical.Youknowverymuchaboutus,butweknowverylittleaboutyou”.[64]

Thenext,whataboutthecivilsocietyinChina?

93 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

4.2 The understanding of civil society in the Chinese context

SincetheChinesegovernmentstartedtoreducetheintensityand scopeofitsformer allaroundadministrativeinterventionintheendofthe1970's,the relationshipbetween“the state” and“thesociety” hasbeenanimportantthemefortheChineseacademia.Undersuch circumstances,thefieldsofsociology,politics,aswellasurbanplanninginChinabeganto paymoreattentiontotheideaof“civilsociety”.

4.2.1 The emergence of the term “civil society” in contemporary China Generally,thearticle“TheconstitutingofChina’sCivilSociety” byDengZhenglai and Jing Yuejin, published in 1992, is the first influential article of civil society research of Chinese academia. Some other related literature includes“The State and the Society A Study on the Chinese Civil society” (Deng, Z. L., 1997), “The Civil Society and the Third Sector” (He,Z.K.,2000),“TheStateandtheSocietyinChineseModernisation” (SunX.L., 2001)and“RightandFreedom– ASurveyonCivilSociety” (YuanZ.S.,2003).Manyof them are also published through the cooperation between scholars from Chinese official institutes and scholars from the West, like “The State and the Civil Society – A New Approach for Studying Social Issues” edited by Deng Zhenglai and Jeffery C. Alexander (1998), and “The Emerging of China's Civil Society and its Significance for Governance” editedbyYuKeping andNoraSausmikat (2002),etc.

In addition, important Western literature about civil society, for example Habermas’ “TheStructuralTransformationofthePublicSphere:AnInquiryintoaCategoryofBourgeois Society” (Habermas,J.,1962),“TheTheoryofCommunicativeAction” (Habermas,J.,1984) andJohnKeane’s“PublicLifeandLateCapitalism:TowardsaSocialistTheoryofDemocra cy” (Keane,J.,1984)weretranslatedandpublishedinChinainthe 1990's.InvitedbyChi nese Social Science Institute and Goethe Institute in Beijing, the German scholar Jürgen Habermas visitedChinainApril2001.HewaswelcomedbymanyhighofficialsincludingLi Tieying, member of China’s Central Political Committee. During the 14dayvisit he made speechesat6famousinstitutesanduniversities.Accordingtothecommentinthewebsite onTheChineseSocialScienceInstitute,“thelevelofHabermas’ visitcouldbecomparedto thosebytheBritishphilosopherBertrandRussellin1919andby theAmericanphilosopher JohnDeweyin1920” [65].Inbrief,thetimefromthebeginningofthe1990'supto nowis theprosperousperiodofcivilsocietyresearchinChina,andthisstronglyreflectsthewillof China’sgovernmentto“usethepositiveelementsfromworldcultureforreference”.(LiT.Y.)

94 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

Fig.42 Habermas welcomed byPoliticalCommittee oftheCCPin2001

Influencedbythissituation,therelationshipbetween“civilsociety” andspatialdevelop ment in China has also gained growing attention. Relevant literature includes “The City ImageandtheSpatialRightsoftheCivilSociety– theAnalysisoftheChineseUrbanDesign” (Yang,Y.,2000),“TheRoleoftheChinesePlannerandtheComingThoughtofCivilSociety” (He,D,2003),“CityPlaza– PublicSpaceandCivilSociety” by(ChenF.,2003)andmore. Besides,theconceptscloselyrelatedtocivilsocietyideaslike“citizenparticipation”,“com munitybasedcooperation” and “civilrights”,whichwererarelyvisibleinChineseplanning literaturebefore,startedtoappearinthecontemporaryplanningdiscussions.Inthearticle “TheTransformationofChina’sModernAdministrativeBuilding” publishedinthemagazine “T+A” (ZhangL.X.,andYangY.L.,2004),threeofthesixkeywords are“publicspace”, “civilrightidea” and “openness”. Since1990, theChineseConstruction Ministryand State EnvironmentalProtectionBureauhavebeenputtingforwardnewlawsandpoliciesforpro moting citizen participation, and their main principals often address the issue of transpa rency andpublicinvolvementofadministrationintheirpublicspeeches.

BoththeChineseacademiaandauthorityhavebeguntovaluetheideaofcivilsociety asasupportsofChina’ssocietyandculturedevelopmentinthenewera .

95 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

4.2.2 The mode of civil society in contemporary China TodiscusshowcivilsocietyincontemporaryChinashouldbeunderstood,abriefreview oftheongoingsocietalchangeconcerningtherelationshipbetweenthegovernmentaland nongovernmental spheres is necessary. In general, such change has at least four major aspects:

Firstly,withtheimplementationofthemarketorientedreform,theboundarybetween the state and the individual is getting clearer. From the 1950's to 1970's, the state monopolised the economic sector, and all citizens must rely on the state for necessary economicresources.Also,theauthority’sinterventionwithsystemslike“Hukou” (urbanand rural household registration), “Danwei” (urban work unit), etc. strongly constrained the freedomofpeople’sindividualchoice.SincetheimplementationofDengXiaoping’sreform, the scope and the extent of government control have been much reduced, laws and contractsarebecomingthemainmeasureforregulatingthebehaviourbetweenthestate andthecitizens.

Nowadays,thecitizensrelymoreandmoreonthemarketforacquiringworkingplaces, income,socialstatus,service,etc.,andthemarkethasalready beenamainresourceforthe individualsapartfromthestate.Withtheincreaseofsocialand economic freedom of the individual,thecitizens’ selforganisingandselfdecidingrealmisexpanding.Accordingtothe researchofSun,thisprocessisalsostronglypromotedbytherapidgrowthoftheeconomic strengthoftheindividual.Bytheendof1990's,the savings of the individuals accounted about3,000billionRMB(c.a.300billionEuro),almostreachedthesumofallstateowned assets.(Sun,L.P.,2004,pp.148)Also,thefreedomofopinionandreligionaregrowing,too. Peoplecaneasilyfindpluralvoicesonsocialandpoliticalaffairsindailylife,andtheamount ofreligionadherentsraisedfrom1,727millioninthebeginning ofthe1950'sto3,218million in1991.[66]

Thesecondaspect,whichiscloselyrelatedtothefirstone,is thatthenumberandin fluence ofregisteredandnonregisteredorganisationsisgrowing.Therewereonlylessthan 6,000socialorganisationsinthe1950's,whilebylate1993,therewerealready1,460atna tional level,19,600attheprovincialand160,000atthecountylevel.[67]Thenumberof BBS(internetbasedBulletinBoardSystem)increasedfrom11,200inJuly1999to153,700 inJanuary2004.[68]InChina,manyinfluentialcitizens’ organisationsarebuiltduetothe reformofthestatedepartmentsandinstitutions,sotheyarestillstronglyinfluencedbythe

96 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

government.Besides,duetolackofvoluntaryfinance,mostsocialorganisationsrelymore or less on the funds appropriated by the government. In contemporary China, the developmentofthesocialorganisationsisdependentonboththe “bottomup” initiativesof themselvesandthe“topdown” supportofthestate.Yettheirinfluenceisobviousbynow; andtheyareincreasinglygaining“powerofspeech” inthesociety.AsJohnFriedmannalso writes in his “China’s Urban Transition” :“Urban China currently displays a remarkable capacity for selforganisation, reflected in the large numberof civil organisations that are nominallyunderthesupervisionofthepartystatebutarebeginningtoactwithagrowing senseofautonomy.” (Friedmann,J.,2005,pp.121)

Tab.41SumofBBS(InternetbasedBulletinBoardSystem)members inChina19992004

Asthethirdaspect,thecooperationbetweenthegovernment and nongovernmental powersforprovidingtheservices,whichhavebeentraditionally offeredbythegovernment since1949,hasbeencontinuouslyexpanded.Suchcooperationconcernsabroadscopeof domainssuchasconsumers’ rights,academicexchange,environmentalprotection,rescuing peopleindisasterareas,andcareforthedisadvantaged,andso on.Thenongovernmental participatorsincludenotonlyprivatefirmsandcitizen’sorganisations,butalsomanyindivi duals.Sinceofmid1990's,privatecapitalandmanagementhavebeenincreasinglyencou ragedtoenterthedomainofconstructingandrunningthemunicipalpublicutilities,which willbefurtherdiscussedinthefollowingpartofthischapter.

97 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

Fig.43The“Sun” schoolsbuiltthrough thejointeffortsof thegovernmentandthesociety

Lastbutnotleast,thestateandeconomiclifearehighlyintertwined,butarealsobeing increasinglyseparated.Inotherwords,theeconomiclifeinChinaisstillgreatlyinfluenced bythestateatpresentthoughpeoplehavegainedmorefreedomthanbefore.Ononehand, many of the most important corporations in the market are stateowned or partly state owned, while many others also have strong governmental ties. On the other hand, the governmentalinstitutions often directly participateinthemanagementofcertaincorpora tions,orinfluencethemarketprocesseswithabroadscopeofadministrativeinterventions. ManyinfluentialChinesescholars,includingWuJinglian,oneoftheearliestadvocatorsof China’s market economy, argue that the excessive intervention of the local authority has greatlyhinderedthevitalityofthemarket.[69]Accordingtothepresentcircumstances,itis not difficult to predict that the economy of China will not transform into a highly self organisingrealminthenearfuture.

TheemergingcivilsocietyinChinaisarousingtheattentionof theinternationalmedia. For example, a recent article in Der SPIEGEL, aleading news magazine in Germany, discussestheinteractionbetweenstateanddiversifiedvoluntaryengagementofthecitizens inChina;(See Lorenz,A.,2006)DeutscheWelle publishedanarticletitled“TheSeedlingof China’sCivilSociety” onitsChineseinternetsiteinSeptember,2006.

98 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

WiththenewsocialchangeinChina,theChineseandoverseasscholarsstarttoargue thattheconceptofcivilsociety– althoughitisrootedintheWesternculture– isableto contributetothediscourseoftheChinesesocietyandpolitics. Manyscholars,includingYuan Zushe,DengZhenglai andJing Yuejin,whobelongtotheinitiatorsofcivilsociety’sstudyin China,supportCohenandArato’s “tripartitestructure” (state civilsociety economy).(Deng, Z.L.andJing,Y.J.,1992;Deng,Z.L.,1997;Yuan,Z.S.,2003)Whileanotherinfluential scholarYuKeping regardscivilsocietyas“therealmofallnongovernmentalorganisations andrelationships”.(Yu,K.P.,2002)

ForthedifferentunderstandingofcivilsocietyinChina,YuKeping argues: “Theconceptofcivilsocietydefinedaccordingtopoliticalscienceemphasizesits'civil' nature: civil societymainlyconsistsof civil organizationswhichprotectcitizens’ rights and political participation or civic engagement. The concept of civil society defined according to sociology emphasizes its 'intermediate' nature: civil society is the inter mediatesectorbetweenthestateandbusinessenterprises.” (Yu,K.P.,2002,pp.190)

Theauthorattemptstoformulatethedefinitionofcivilsociety fromamoresociological perspective. Chinese civil society, in this research, refers to the sphere of indivi- duals, families and households, of citizen’s organisations and public communica- tions, and of the non-governmental body’s non-for-profit involvement for the provision of public services between the state and the market. Itcanberegardedas aChineseinterpretationoftheconceptofCohenandArato.

The“local” featuresoftheChinesecivilsocietyinclude:First,itsrapid growthislargely duetotheinitialreductionofgovernmentalcontrolbythestate.Thecivilsociety’sspherein China is gaining growing independence; however, in comparison with the reality of the WesterncivilsocietiesdefinedbyHabermas orCohenandArato,itismuchmoreinterwoven withthestateinstitutions.Second,an“empowermentinteraction” hasalreadyexistedbe tween theChinesecivilsocietyandthegovernment:thedevelopmentofChinesecivilsociety ishighlyrelatedwiththesupportofthegovernment,andinturn,thegovernmentalcapa cityofmanagingpublicaffairsisstronglypromotedbythesupportofthecivilsociety.

Basedonthedefinitionwededuced,wecanfindrichresourcesofcivilsocietythrough outthehistoryofChina.

99 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

4.2.3 The resources of civil society in Chinese history In the “the Empire of the Middle”, although the whole nation was strictly under the strongcontroloftheimperialcourt,emergingevidencesshowsthatthequasiselforganising spherebetweenthestateandthemarketalsocontributedstronglytothesocialorderand publicwelfare.BeforethefoundingofP.R.C.in1949,sucheffortcanatleastbeseenfrom thefollowingfiveaspects:

1.Thesocialorder in counties during China’s imperial era was usually conducted by both governmental officials and respected local squires, and this reflects a high sense of autonomy.ThefundamentalunitofthetraditionalChineseadministrative systemwasthe countygovernment“Yamen” (Chinese: 衙门),representingthecourt.However,theheadof theYamen,themagisters,usuallystayedinthecountycentreandseldomwentouttothe countryside.TaxandsecurityissuesweretheYamen’s maintasks;whilethelocalsquires (Chinese: 乡绅),whodidnotbelongtothegovernmentalinstitutions,wereusuallyincharge ofalargevarietyoflocalaffairs,fromintermediatingfamilyconflictstomobilisingpeoplefor buildingnecessaryinfrastructure.ForJohnFriedmann,thisreflectstheautonomytraditionin China’sownculture.(Friedmann J.,2005,pp.98)

Fig.44Yamen,county government inancient China

100 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

2. In each dynasty of China’s history, there wasn’t a lack of the citizen’s efforts for helping the poor or the disadvantaged. According to the recent study of M. S. Niu, The “village contracts” (Chinese: 乡约),broughtforwardbyLuDajun duringtheSongDynasty (9601279AD),offeredvariousaidsforthetruthfullypoorandpermittedthemtopaybackin thefollowingyears.ZhuXi,oneofthemostinfluentialConfucianscholarsinancientChina, established the “county warehouses” (Chinese: 社仓) system, which not only provided the poorwithhelp,butalsoofferedentirevillages,eventhewhole countyasenseofeconomic securityduringyearsofnaturalcalamity.(Niu,M.S.,2003).IntheRepublicofChina(1912 1949),theNationalisticgovernmentattemptedtolauncha“CooperativeCommunity” system, influencedbyGermany,forredevelopingtheruraleconomy,which washighlystrickenby ’sinvasionandthelastinginland conflicts.Asharedfeature of the mentioned systemsisthatallwerebasedoncivilian’sautonomousagreements.

Fig.45 ZhuXi,founderof “countywarehouse” inMingDynasty

3. In ancient China, private academies (Chinese: 私学) played an important role in promotingeducationandresearch.BeforetheQin dynasty(221–206BC),privateacademies built by civilians already existed besides the education institutions built by government. Confucius(551479BC),alsoaninitiatorofprivateacademy,insists“equaleducationregard lessoforigin”.IntheSongdynasty,theprivateacademyalmostachievedsimilarinfluence to the governmental academy.[70] Many scholars in famous academies of the Song and

101 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

MingDynasty(13681644AD)setforthstrongcriticismonpublic affairs, which sometimes functionedasa“soft” restrictiontotheimperialauthority.Itisalsoapparentthat officials tookthe scholars’ adviceorshowedsomeselfrestraintthankstotheacademy’s criticism. ThedebatesbetweenthescholarsheldatacademieshadadeepimpactonChineseConfu cianism SchoolandthepoliticalsystemoftheChineseEmpire.Amongthemafamousone wasthe3daydebatebetweenZhuXiandZhangShiandtheirstudentsattheYue LuAca demyin1167,whichhadanattendanceofmorethan1,000scholarsfromalloverthena tion.Fromthedevelopmenttheprivateacademywecanalsofindsome preliminarydemo cratic practice.Forexample,therewereregulationsforelectionandthelimitedtermofthe master,aswellasforstudents’ participationinacademy’smanagement.

Fig.46“Yue Lu” academyfoundedbyciviliansduringtheSongDynasty

4.Fromtheendof19thcenturytothe1930's,intellectualsintheChinesecitiesoften gatheredtofreelyexpresstheiropinionsonabroadrangeofpoliticalissues,withtheZhang GardeninShanghaiasoneofthewellknownplacesforholdingsuchevents.Usuallybeing accessible for everyone and announced beforehand, the speeches in Zhang Garden often hadbroadparticipation.ManyopinionssetforthherewerealsopublishedinShanghai’snew papersandspreadnationwide.In1900,afterknowingthattheEmpressDowger Tz’uHsi (Chinese: 慈禧)wasplanningtheabdicationoftheemperorGuang Xu,citizensinatotalof

102 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

1,231gatheredinZhangGarden,signingtogethertoinformBeijingthatthey opposedto choosinganother heir. They claimedifTz’uHsi went herownway,theywould propose a nationwidebusinessandindustrialstrike.Eventually,Tz’uHsi waspressedtoabolishthe abrogationplan.[71]ZhangGardencanbeseenasamodelfor“publicsphere” (Habermas, J.)inChina’sownculturalhistory.

5. Throughout Chinese history, one can see a lotof voluntary efforts of successful businessmeninpublicaffairs,suchaseducation,rescuingvictimsofnaturalcalamities,etc. From1913,theentrepreneurChenJiageng investedinbuildinginstitutionsincludingcounty schools, kindergartens, hospitals, and libraries in Fujian Province. In 1924, he founded a “Department for Popularizing Education”, which played a great role for constructing and maintaining70primaryandmiddleschoolsinthewholeprovince. In1920,Cheninitiatedto buildthe,thefirstuniversityinFujian,andalsothefirstuniversitythat acceptedfemalestudents[72].ChenmaintainedXiamen Universitywithhisownmoneyfor 16yearsanddonatedittothegovernmentinthespringof1937. BesidesChen’scontri butions,the“PeopleEducationMovement” byTaoinJiangsu Province,“VillageConstruction Movement” byLiang inShandongProvince,the“PopulaceEducationMovement” byYan in Province,etc.alsogainedhighreputation.

Fig.47XiamenUniversitydonatedbyChenJiageng

103 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

Thisisonlyabriefreviewoffiveaspectsonthe civil participation in social affairs in ChinabeforethefoundingofthePeople’sRepublicin1949.From1949to1978,however, theinfluenceofthecivilsocietyinchinashrankgreatly.Formerindependentsocialassocia tions weredisbandedorclampeddown;manyautonomousinstitutionsor charityorganisa tions wereincorporatedintogovernmentalinstitutions.Throughturningindustry,agriculture, tradeandhandicraftbranchesintothepublicownedsystem,thestatebecamealmostthe onlyresourceprovidingfinancial,workingandeducationalopportunitiesforthecitizen.Free marketbehaviourwasforbidden,theeconomicstatusofcitizenswasdesignedlymadeave rage while property ofmany “capitalist” familieswas taken by the government. With the plannedeconomyandideologicaleducation,Chinaestablishedasystemwithastrongcapa bility of“topdown” mobilisation.However,thecitizen’sowninitiatives,unlesssupportedby thegovernment,fadedmostlyduetolackofnecessaryresource– insomesense,thisalso ledtothedecreaseofpeople’sautonomousconsciousness.

Let’stakeanexamplefromChina’scapitalBeijing.Asurveytakeninthe1950'sshows thatonly5%oftheoldresidencesinBeijingcouldbecategorisedas“endangeredbuilding”. Before1978’sreformthegovernment’sinvestmentinhousingrenovationwasfarlessthan necessaryandBeijinghadonlyfinishedseveralminitypetemplateprojectslikethe“Long xugou Reconstruction”. Besides, individual households were lacking necessary funds and technicalsupportforselfaidingmaintenance.Astormin1974causedthecollapseofmore than4,000residences(seeFang,K.,1999,pp.138),showinghowserioustheproblemof Beijing’saginghousingwasatthattime.

During this period of time, efforts for seeking selforganising and autonomy by civil society were also visible. In 1972, the wellknown Italian leftwing director Michelangelo Antonioni,invitedbyJiang Qing,Mao’swifeandamajorfigureoftheCulture Revolution, filmed a temporary market in his famous work “Chung Kuo” (China), where people took poultryandhomemadefoodtoexchangewitheachothersecretlywith uneasiness. Such trade behaviour was almost illegal then, but people organized it all around the country. Antonioni’s “Chung Kuo” belongs to the few existing film records focusing on citizen’sdailylifeinChinaduringtheCulturalRevolution.

InDecember1978,13farmersweredeterminedto“risktheirlives” forcultivatingthe landindependentto“thePeople’sCommune” inXiaogang Village,Fengyang countyofAnhui province.“Ifthetrialfails,” theywroteinthecontract,“wecadresarepreparedfordeathor

104 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

prisonpunishments,andothercommunememberspledgetoraiseourchildrenuntil they are 18 years old, becoming adults.” Their brave action was given high attention by the centralgovernment,andlaterDengXiaopingpushedsuchmeasures nationwide,liftingthe curtain for a great reform of Chinese agriculture. Today, the contract signed with the peasants’ bloodyfingerprintisondisplayattheChineseRevolutionMuseum,andCCTV,the official channel of China’s central government, praises it as “cradle of China's household contractresponsibilitysystem”.[73]Thiseventshowsthatthecitizen’screativityand initia tive do have the power to promote the development both of themselves and the state.

Fig.48 Contractsignedbythe peasants ofXiaogang village in1978

Fig.49 Yan Juncang (left), initiatorofthe Xiaogangevent

105 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

Thereisplentyofevidencethattheautonomoustraditionofthe citizenshasneverva nished inChina.Althoughitwasoftenconcealedbytheseeminglyallencompassinginter ventions ofthestate.ThestudyonChina’sowncultureandresourcesofcivilsocietyisable toenrichthedepthoftheglobalcivilsocietydialog,andmore important,theyhelppromote citizen’sselfconsciousnessforthe“renaissance” ofthecivilsocietyincontemporaryChina.

4.3 Civil society’s participation in planning theory

Backtourbanplanning.Accordingtothe“Chinaoriented” definitionformulatedbythis thesis,therearethreemain“subspheres” ofthecivilsociety:1)thesphereoftheindividual, family and household, 2) the sphere of the citizens’ organisations, public communications andsocialmovements,aswellas3)thesphereofthe nongovernmental bodies’ involve ment fortheprovisionofpublicservices.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanning,inthisre search,referstotheparticipationofthesethreesubspheresinabroadscopeofplanning relatedissues.Generally,suchparticipationcanbeobservedin twocategoriesinplanning Theoryintwocategories: a.citizeninvolvementfordecisionmakingofplanning b.publicprivatepartnershipforfundingandmanaging

Itisnecessarytopointoutthatthepublicprivatepartnershipswithouttheinvolvement of the nonforprofit efforts of private bodies do not belong to civil society’s participation mentionedinthisthesis.

Whatarethemaindistinctionsbetweenthesetwocategories?Ononehand,thescope ofcivilsociety’sinputisdifferent.Forthefirstcategory,theinputisusuallylimitedtoim materialresources– information,knowledge,etc.;whileforthesecondcategory, theinput alsoincludesmaterialresources,especiallymonetaryandfacilityinvestment.Ontheother hand,theformerusuallyhappensduringtheformulationofplanning,whilethelattercan happenduringeachphaseofplanning– fromformulation,tofacilitation,torealisation.In reality,however,thesetwocategoriesofparticipationcanalso overlapwitheachother .

Asplanningpracticesworldwidehaveshown,theparticularplanning knowledgeofa certainregionoftenhasinstructiveorreferentialvalueforotherregions.Itmakessensefor thisresearchworktoreviewtherelevantstudiesofplanningtheory,althoughsomeofthem “grow” fromamuchdifferentsocialandpoliticalbackgroundasthatofChina.

106 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

4.3.1 Citizen involvement for decision-making Beforethe1940’s,theModernMovementofarchitecturedidnotsupporttheparticipa tion ofcitizensinthepracticeofarchitecturaldesignorurbanplanning.TheAthensCharter (LeCorbusier,1941)statesthat“theruthlessviolenceofprivateinterestprovokesadisa strous upsetbetweenthethrustofeconomicforces… andthepowerlessnessofsocialsolid arity” (Principle73).And,italsoarguesthat“privateinterestwillbesubordinatetothecol lective interest” (Principle95).Sincethe 1950's,Westernplanningtheoryhasplacedincrea singimportanceoncitizenparticipationforthedecisionmakingofplanning.

Fig.410LisaVeneKlasen andValerieMiller’scartoon onAdvocacyPlanning

In1962,DavidoffandReiner published“AChoiceTheoryofPlanning”.Theyarguethat plannersshouldnotmakethechoiceforthepublic,sincethevalueandjudgementofplan ners cannotrepresentthatofthepublic.Thetargetofplanningshouldbetoexpandthe choiceofthepublicbutnotrestrainit.(DavidoffP.andReiner T.,1962)Basedonthiscon cept,Davidoffpublished“AdvocacyandPluralisminPlanning” in1965andstatesthatdiver sified demands,willsandvaluesofcitizensshouldbeintegratedinurbanplanning.Theur banplanmustbemadethroughthecommunicationandnegotiationamongdifferentsocial groups.Forhim,planningisapoliticalprocessforresolvinga broadscopeofsocialproblems, andtheparticipationofthedisadvantagedshouldbeespeciallypromoted.Theinvolvement

107 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

ofcitizens’ organisationswouldimproveboththequalityofplanningdecisionandtheeffec tiveness ofplanninginstitutions.Intheplanningprocess,plannersshouldfunctionas“ad vocators”,“defenders” and“representatives” oftheinterestsofdiversifiedsocialgroups,like lawyers.(Davidoff,P.,1965)

In 1969,Arnstein published“TheLadderofCitizenParticipation”. She defines citizen participation as "the redistribution of power that enables the havenot citizens, presently excluded from the political and economic processes,tobedeliberatelyincludedinthefu ture”.(Arnstein,S.R.,1969,pp.351)Forher,citizenparticipationcanbeanalysedineight rungsandthreelevelslikealadder,witheachrungrepresentingtheextentofthecitizens' powerindeterminingtheendplanningresult.

Fig.411 Arnstein'sLadderof CitizenParticipation

Thefirsttworungsoftheladderarethelevels“Manipulation” and“Therapy” intheca tegory ofNonparticipationTherealobjectivesofthesetwolevels“arenottoenablepeople toparticipateinplanningorconductingprograms,buttoenable powerholdersto'educate' or'cure'theparticipants”.(pp.360)Twolevelsaboveare“Informing” and“Consultation” of thelevelof“tokenism”,throughwhichthecitizenscansymbolicallygetplanninginformation

108 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

andpresenttheiropinion,buttheycannotinfluencehowtheiropinionsareacceptedbythe powerful.Thefifthlevel,“Placation”,meansthatthepowerholdersallowthepublictoprodu ceadvice,butstillholdtherightofdecisionmaking.Thehighestcategoryis“CitizenPower”, whichincludes3levels,namelyPartnership,DelegatedPowerand CitizenControl.Partner ship enables the public to make negotiations and build consensus with traditional power holders.ThroughDelegatedPowerandCitizenControl,thehavenotcitizens“obtainthema jority ofdecisionmakingseats,orfullmanagerialpower”.(Arnstein,S.R.,1969,pp.361)

Arnstein’s study also shows that different levels of citizen participation are closely relatedtothedemocraticprocessofpoliticallife,andthatthereallocationofpowerplaysan important role in the practice of citizen participation in planning. The contributions of DavidoffandArnstein laidaveryimportantfoundationforthefurtherdiscussionofcitizen participationinplanningtheory.

In 1977, some influential architects, planners and scholars from both developed and developingcountriesmetinaninternationalconferenceinPeruandapprovedthe“Charter ofMachu Picchu”.Thischarterstates:“Theobjectiveofplanningingeneral,includingeco nomic planning,urbanplanninganddesign,andarchitecture,isultimatelytheinterpretation ofhumanneedsandtherealisationofappreciatedurbanformsandserviceforpeopleina contextofopportunity.Suchplanningrequiresacontinuousandsystematicprocessofinter action among the design professions, the people of the cities and their common political leadership.” [74]

Sincetheendofthe20thcentury,planningtheoryhasbeenstronglyinfluencedbythe progress of social and political ideas, including those of Habermas, Castells, Lefebvre, Giddens, etc. Highly inspired by Habermas’ “The Theory of Communication Action”, John Foresterstatesinhis“PlanningintheFaceofPower” (Forester,J.,1980,pp.277):

“Byrecognizingplanningpracticeasnormativelyrolestructuredcommunicationaction whichdistorts,coversup, orrevealstothepublictheprospectsandpossibilitiesthey face,acriticaltheoryofplanningaidsuspractically andethicallyaswell.Thisisthe contribution of critical theory to planning: pragmatics with version – to reveal true alternatives, to correct false expectations, to counter cynicism, to foster inquiry, to spread political responsibility, engagement, and action. Critical planning practice, technicallyskilledandpoliticallysensitive,isanorganisinganddemocratizingpractice.”

109 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

ScholarsincludingForester,Healy,Sager,Innes,etc.setforthanewtheoryof“Com municative Planning” throughtheirrichcontributionsinthe1980'sand1990's.They believe planningasa“communicativeactionandinteractivepractice”.Themainideaofthe“Com municative Planning” include:

a.Planningisbestunderstoodasacommunicativeactionratherthananalysisforpower holders,anditshouldbebasedontheconsensusofabroadscopeofparticipants.Anes sential objectofplanningistoenableefficientdialogbetweenpeople onplanningrelated issues.(Sager,T.,1994,Innes,J.E.,1995)Besidesroutineplanninginstruments,people’s value, experience, tradition and customs can also contribute to planning results through communicativeprocesses.(Forester,J.,1993) b.Communicationinplanningisalearningprocessofallparticipants.Ithelpspartici pantsadjustorclarifytheirformerideas,andconceivejointconcepts.Thedialogandinter actionbetweentheparticipantscannotonlyarticulatedifferentinterestandmakecompro mises,butalsoimproveparticipants’ understanding andbuildrealisticandmutuallybene ficial planningdecisions.(Forester,J.,1993;Innes,J.E.,1998) c.Plannersshouldshiftfromtheformerroleas“elite” forthepowerholderstotherole asexpertsservingforallplanningparticipants.Toenableefficientcommunicationinplan ning, planners should function to organise dialog, facilitate consensusbuilding, mediate conflicts and negotiate different values; they havethedutytoprotecttheinterestsof all groupsinthesociety,includingthelesspowerfulones(Forester,J.,1989;Healy,P.,1997)

Recently, the theory of “collaborative Planning” has been addressed by some former theoristsofcommunicativeplanning.(Healy,P.,1997;Innes,J.E.andBooher,D.E.,2000) Innes andBooher argue:

“…threeconditionsgoverntherelationshipofagentsinacollaborativenetwork:diver sity,interdependence,andauthenticdialogue(DIAD).Whentheseconditionsare m e t , theparticipantsinthenetworkcandevelopadaptiveinnovations thatwerenotapparent orevenopentothemasindividualagents.Likeacomplexadaptivesystem,theDIAD networkasawholeismorecapableoflearningandadaptationin thefaceoffragmen tation and rapid change than a set of disconnected agents… As a result, they are enabledtoactbothindependentlyandcooperativelyformutualbenefitwithoutcentral direction.” (Innes,J.E.andBooher,D.E.,2000,pp.3)

110 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

Fig.412Innes andBooher’s modelof“CollaborativePlanning”

For Innes and Booher, the precondition of efficient collaboration is that participants have become aware that their interests are dependent on the behaviours of others and thereisakindofreciprocityamongthem.Basedontheprincipleofreciprocity,thediversity ofparticipantsprovidesawiderangeofresources,information, personalities, experiences, andopinionsasmaterialsforimprovingplanning. Through dialog and selforganising in a senseofauthenticity,peoplecandevelopcooperativeactionsandreachtheobjectivesof boththecollectiveandtheindividual.(Innes,J.E.andBooher,D.E.,2000,pp.17)

Whyhastherebeenaproductivedevelopmentofparticipativeplanningtheorysincethe 1950's?Atleasttworeasonsshouldbementioned.Firstly, the leftwing criticism of state intervention,theriseofliberalismideologyandthegrowthofcivilrightsmovementsinthe westhaveimpactedmanyaspectsofthesocietyincludingtheplanningdomain.Secondly, since the massive urban renewal had induced severe social and economic problems and continuous protest of the citizens, many planners and scholars rejected the technocratic ideasand“topdown” planningmode,andturnedtocooperatingwiththecitizens.[75]

Withsuchtheoreticaldevelopmentsandalsowiththecontinouspromotionofplanners, polititians, social workers as well as citizen participants since the 1950's, following ideas havebecomesharedconsiousnessinplanningpracticeofmanydevelopedcountries:

111 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

a.Planning shouldenable broadcommunicativeand cooperative activity between the “stakeholders” includinggovernment,planners,investors, citizengroupsand theresidents whomightbeinfluencedbytheplanningresult,andplanningdecisionshouldbebasedon theconsensusofpeople,andrespectthediversityofpeople’sinterests. b.Thevalueandjudgementofplannerscannotrepresentallpeople.Forprovidinga consensusbuildingplatformofallinvolved,plannersshouldactasmediators, coordinators orfacilitatorsoftheinvolvedparties.Theyshouldnotonlyfunctionastechnicalspecialists butalsoasexpertssolvingconflictsofdifferentinterestsand opinions.

Forcitizenparticipationinthedecisionmakingprocessofplanning,thepotentialof improvingplanningperformanceinclude: a.Itenablesurbanplanningtoobtaintheinformationandknowledgeofthecivilsociety tobetteridentifyingthetargetsandraisingsolutions; b.Ithelpsthecitizensofdiversifiedsocialgroups,including thelesspowerfulones,to influencetheplanningresultbytheirowneffortsthuspromotingsocialjustice; c.Itprovidestheopportunitiesfortheinteractivelearningbetweenthegovernmentand thecitizensthusexpandingthecapacitiesandthemotivationof eachinvolvedandofthe whole; d.Itpromotesthelocalidentityandpeople’sresponsibilitytotheirurbanspace;etc.

Thefollowingwilldiscussthepublicprivatepartnershipwiththeinvolvementofvolun tary effortsoftheprivatebodies astheothercategoryofcivilsociety’sparticipationinurban planning.

4.3.2 Public-private partnership for funding and managing ThePPPpractice forimprovingurbanenvironmenthasalreadyalongtraditionin many Europeannations,andforsomescholars,itisevenrecognisedasthe“quintessentialvehi cle” toimplementanddeliverurbanregeneration.(Berry,J.S.)In“PublicPrivatePartner ships:ImprovingUrbanLife”,PerryDavisarguestheconceptofPPPisgenerallyutilizedin threelevels.First,broadlyspeaking,anyarrangementsinvolvingpublicandprivatesectors fortheprovisionofpublicutilitiesandservices;second,themultilateralandpartlyprivatized infrastructureprojects;third,thecooperationbetweenenterprises,individualsandthelocal governmentforimprovingurbanconditions(Davis,P.,1986).

AlthoughthedefinitionofPPPvariesmuchinliteraturesandofficialstatements,[76]PPP

112 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

programssharesomecommonfeatures,including: a.Theycontainmorethantwopartners,onefromthepublicandonefromtheprivate sphereatleast.(NHS,1999) b.Eachparticipantisaprinciplecapableofbargainingonbehalfofitself.Therightof decisionmakingissharedbyallparticipantsratherthanmonopolizedbythepowerful.(Be nnett,R.J.andKrebs,G.,1991) c.Eachparticipantsharestheresponsibilities,andmustmakeitsowncontributionsto thecooperativeprojectthroughtransferringmaterialorimmaterialresourcesintoit.(Colin, K.,1998)

ThepublicparticipantsinthePPPprogramoftenencompassthecentralorlocalautho rity,variousotherpublicinstitutionslikestateowned transportation companies, museums, universitiesand soon. Theprivateparticipantsinclude boththeprofitmotivatedand the nonforprofit bodies private enterprises, voluntary associations, publicinterest groups, communitybasedorganisationsandindividualcitizens.TheparticularoperationofthePPPis closely associated with the consensus built by the public sector, the market and the civil society.

Official bodies authorityandpublicinstitutions

Non-for-profit bodies Profit motivated bodies communitybasedorganisations, privateenterprises, volunteerassociations,residents individualinvestors

Fig.413MainbodiesofthePPPwithcivilsociety’s participation

113 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

ThePPPpracticesrepresentacategoryofparticipationofcivil societyinplanningissues, and refers to those that involve nonforprofit efforts of the individual citizens, citizens’ organisationsandprivateenterprises.ThePPPs onlyformedbythegovernmentandprivate enterprises,whopursuecommercialprofitfromthemarket,donotincludetheparticipation ofcivilsociety.

ThefollowingwilldiscussthosePPPs astheparticipationofcivilsocietyintheplanning domainintwocategories,oneonthecommunitylevelandanother abovethe community level.

4.3.2.1. PPP on the community level ApreconditionofsuchPPPprogramisthatthegovernmentoffersresources,suchas monetaryinvestment,credit,technicalguidanceandtraining,etc.,tothe“endusers” the communityandtheresidents forpromotingtheirselfhelpingcapacity.AlthoughPPPisan importedtermforChina’s modernplanning,comparableconcepts havealready existed in theChineseculture.Asmentionedbefore,withthecoordinationoflocalelites,manyinfras tructure projectsinoldChinesetownsandvillageswerebuiltthroughthejointeffortsofthe local“Yamen” authorityandthepopulace.(Seepp.94)

SincetheendofWorldWarII,thecommunitylevelPPPhasgainedgrowingattention bytheUnitedNations.In1976,theVancouverDeclarationofthe FirstUnitedNationsCon ference onHumanSettlements(UNCHS,1976)stated,“Adequateshelterandservicesarea basichumanrightwhichplacesanobligationongovernmentstoensuretheirattainmentby all people, beginning with direct assistance to the least advantaged through guided pro grammes ofselfhelpandcommunityaction” (GeneralPrinciple 8). In 1996, the Istanbul Declaration Settlements of the Second United Nations Conference on Human Settlements stated,“weadopttheenablingstrategyandtheprinciplesofpartnership andparticipationas themostdemocraticandeffectiveapproachfortherealizationofourcommitments” (UNCHS, 1996).ThroughtheeffortsofUN,selfhelppracticeshavebeenwidelypromotedtoimprove thecommunity’slivingconditionsinmanycountriesinAsia,AfricaandLatinAmerica.Then, howhavethecommunitybasedPPP’sfunctionedforimprovingtheresidents’ environment?

Let’s first look at the disadvantages of the conventional governmentled housing re newal.IndevelopedcountriesliketheUSA,asJane Jacobs’ study shows, the largescale housingrenewaldominatedbythegovernmentpresentsaseriesof problems:itcostsmuch

114 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

andcontributeslittle;itactuallyneverreducesslumsbutmovestheslumstootherplaces, usuallycausingnewslumsonalargerscale;capitalflowsintothespeculativeestatemarket more easily, which negatively influences the urban economy. Moreover, such housing re newal in inner city often greatly threatens the existing economic vitality and the cultural identity. (Jacobs,J., 1964) Christopher Alexander claims, while a great amount of capital flowsintolargescaledhousingprojects,otherareasareoftenfacedwithcontinuousdeterio ration due to the lack of stable investment (Alexander, C., 1975). For many developing countries,“Thefirstattemptstosolvethehousingproblem… particularlyinthe1960'sand 1970's,weretocopyEuropeandbegintobuildpublichousing.Thisrapidlystalledasitbe cameclearitwouldnotprovideahundredthofwhatwasneeded.Itisestimatedthatno morethanahundredthousanddwellingswerebuiltindevelopingcountries,andmostof those went to government employees, such as police or teachers.” (UNCHS, 1999) Many otherstudiessince1950'salsoshowthatgovernmentledhousinginitiativesareofteninsuf ficientive,andevenleadtohighsocialcosts.(Abrams,C.,1955;Wates,N.,1976;Fang,K., 2000)

CentreforMinimumCostHousingofMcGrillUniversity(CMCH),Canadaargues,thereal effectofarenewalprojectisusuallyhighlyrelatedtohowthe fundsareusedratherthan howmuchthesumofthefundsis;andthemosteffectivewayfor improvingthecommuni ty’s housingconditionistolettheresidentsdecidehowtousethe fundsandparticipatein theprojectthemselves[77].

Let’s shift to infrastructure. In the city Karachi, the Pakistani social scientist Akhtar Hameed Khanestablishedatrainingprogram“Orangi PilotProject” helping citizenstolay communitydrainagepipelinesontheirownwiththecooperationofthegovernment.Inspi ringeffectswereshownquicklyandthelocalresidentsacknowledgedthattheirowncon tribution makeabettercommunityenvironmentpossible.Asaresult,this programiswel comed by the whole city, and many small companies and experts for sewer construction emerge. From 1980 to 1992, the local residents built a sewer system connecting 72,000 householdsandmadeacontributionofover2millionUSDtothecity.[78]Meanwhile,the “Orangi PilotProject” alsoextendsthedomainsto familyplanning,creditand savingsfor smallenterprises,upgradingofphysicalandacademicconditions oflocalschools,andwo men'sparticipationindevelopment.[79]

Fromtheaspectofhousingandinfrastructurewecan seethat communitybasedre

115 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

newal isabletoprolongtheexistingurbantextureandneighbourhood life,helppreservethe city’sidentityandpreventsmanysocialproblemslikemarginalisingthepoorordestroying theexistingeconomicvitality,socialstructure,andculturallivelihood,whichlargescaledre newal projectsoftenproduce.

Also,fortworeasonsthecommunitybasedPPPmodelisaninstrumentforimproving theurbaneconomy.Firstly,ithelpsthecityprovidecheaprent forthelabourforce,thus reducingtheproductioncostforenterprisesandenhancingtheurbancompetitiveness;se condly,communitybasedrenewalinhistoricalareashelpthegovernmentsavethepreser vation budget,andcreatenewattractionsforboththe“creativeclass” (Florida,R.)andthe tourismindustry.

4.3.2.2 PPP above community level Usually,theconstructionandmaintenanceofpublicutilitiesabovecommunitylevelare providedby“publicenterprises”,inotherwords,thegovernmentisthedirectproducerof suchservices.Peoplehavealreadyrecognisedthatthismodeoftenhasthedisadvantages likelackofsufficientcoverage,lowefficiency,rarelybringingbackthehighinvestments,etc. However,theoperationofpublicutilitiesthroughtheprivatesectormightreducetheservice quality,resultinthe“gentrification” ofsomeservices,andminimizeinnovationsforsaving thecostsormaximizingtheprofit.ThroughthePPP program,planningservice ofthe city can be strengthened by the initiatives of the society, including the efforts of private enterprises or investors as well as various citizen’s organizations, voluntary groups and individuals.Inpractice,thepublicprivatepartnershipinpublicutilitieshascoveredabroad domainofplanning,includingwaterandgassupply,garbageandseweragedisposals,public transportationandcommunicationutilities,etc.

AmongdiversifiedformsofthePPP,Leasebuildoperate/buybuildoperate(LBO/BBO) andbuildtransferoperate(BTO)aretwousualformsindevelopedcountriesforproviding infrastructure.TheLBO/BBOformmeansthatprivatebodies– sometimesincludingindivi dualsthroughissuingstock leaseorbuyinfrastructures from the government and then restructure,expandandoperatetheinfrastructureviafranchise;itcanchargetheusersand meanwhile,payfranchisefeestothegovernment. TheBTOformdeterminesthatprivate bodiesinvestinbuildingnewinfrastructurewhiletheownership belongstothepublic.The privateconstructorshaveaperiodofoperatingright(usuallyabout20to40years)forthe utilitiesandtheycanchargetheusersduringthisperiod.[80]AlthoughmeasureslikeLBO/

116 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

4. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

BBOandBTOoftenmeans“partlyprivatization” inpractice,therelatedutilitieskeeptheir natureofpublicuseandtheymustrunaccordingtheconsensusbetweenthepublicandthe privatepartners.[81]

BesidestheprovisionofphysicalinfrastructuresthroughLBO/BBO,BTO,etc.,thePPP above community level also includes the cooperation between the public institutions and citizenorganizationsforprovidingvariousprofitornonforprofitservices,includingmonitor ing theenvironment,trafficproblems,assistingthehandicappedin publicspacesandsoon. Forunpredictableoremergenteventsincities,voluntarygroups’ involvementsareusuallyas effectiveastheactionstakenalonebythegovernmental, and this has been observed in OsakaKobeEarthquakeinJapan,the9.11.TerrorAttackintheUSA,andtherecentTsu nami inSoutheastAsia,etc.

TheadvocacyofPPPisoneofthekeyissuesoftheUnitedNationsDevelopmentPro gram (UNDP). UNDP encourages the privateowned institutions with public functions and principlestoestablishnewpartnershipswithpublicsectors,andenhancetheiroperational transparencyandreliability. (UNDP,2002)IntheWest,Toledo’sRiverfrontDevelopmentsin theUSAandIBAEmscher ParkinGermanyaretworecentprominentexamplesforthePPP programsinurbanplanning.

In the first project, the government employed flexible financing methods for invest ment ofatotalofmorethan1billionUSDfromprivatesectorsandofabout12millionform thestate.Thepublicprivateinvestmentratioreaches10:1.The government,privateenter prisesandnonprofitorganizationscofoundedaleadershipinstitutionandencouragedthe commoncitizenstoparticipateinmakingthedevelopmentpolicy. Throughthejointefforts, theformerparkinglotsandwastedconstructionareashavebeenrestructuredtoapedes trian park and multifunctional area of 15 acres. This project has not only protected the natural environment, enhanced the leisure function of the area, but also created many employmentopportunitiesforlocalresidentsandbroughtsustainablefinancialincomesfor thegovernment.[82]

InGermany, “InternationalConstructionExhibition” (IBA) is an influential semipublic andsemiprivateagency,andinvolvesnotonlythecitygovernmentsbutalsomanyprivate enterprisesandnongovernmentorganizations.Sincethe1990's,IBAhasputmucheffort into the integration and coordination of the official and nonofficial participation for the

117 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

spatialrevitalizationonaregional level, as Hassenpflug mentions, “…the directory of IBA acts as a broker and facilitator in a multistakeholder development process in order to balancedifferentinterestsbyfocussingthemonjointlyagreedprojects” (Hassenpflug,D., 2005).DuringtheIBAEmscher Parkprojectfrom1989to1999,over17Germanmunicipal governmentsparticipatedintheplanningascooperativepartners.InthewholeRuhrArea, approximately120projectsofdifferentscaleswereimplemented, andtheformerindustrial landscapeoftheEmscher Rivervalleyturnedintoavividgallerypresentingmoderndesign andart.PromotedbyIBA,peoplerediscovertheaestheticsandfunctionalvalueofindustrial heritagesintheRuhrArea.(Sieverts,T.,1991)TheIBAEmscher Parkprojecthasnotonly contributedmuchtotheregionalimage,butalsostimulatesthetourismindustry,aswellas meetingtherisingdemandsofthe“creativeclass” (Florida,R.)forurbanspace.

Also,sincetheplanningofIBAEmscher Park,manyinformalplanningelements,i.e.the participationofthesocietyareintegratedinconstitutionalgovernmentalplanning,andthe traditionaldistinctionbetweenthe“functionalplanning” and“flexibleplanning” inGermany hasbeenweakening.

Fig.414Thedifferencebetweenfunctionalplanningandflexibleplanning(Hassenpflug,D.,2005)

OnthedifferenceofthetwoformsofplanningintheWest,Hassenpflugargues,func tional planningtendstointerpretpublicgoodsasprior concessions for more quantitative

118 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

development;flexibleplanning,incontrast,aimsatpromotingsoftlocationfactorslikeenvi ronmental quality,culturalservicesandallthatisindispensableforimprovinglivingcondi tions beyondthingslikeincome,infrastructureetc.“Whilefunctionalplanninganswersthe question‘whatdoweneed?’ inanadministrativemannerforthecollective,flexibleplanning answersthequestion‘whatdowelike?’ inaparticipatorymannerbycooperatingwithele ments ofcivilsociety.” (Hassenpflug,D.,2005,pp.8)

Generally,thePPPmode,eitheroncommunitylevelorabovethecommunitylevel,has thefollowingadvantage: a.Itisabletoreleasethefinancialpressureofthepublicsector,widensthescopeand qualityofgovernmentalservice; b.Itisabletointegratetheknowledgeofthenongovernmentalspherethusreducing therisksofinvestmentandmanagementwhicharetraditionallytakenbypublicsectors; c. It is able to spread technical training for personnel through all participants, thus strengtheningbothpublicsector’sgovernanceandsociety’sselforganisingability; d.Itisabletostrengthentheresponsibilityoftheinvolvedpeopletothespaceorthe projectthattheycontributeto;etc.

Bothofthesetwocategoriesoftheparticipationofthe“thirdpower” inplanning,na mely citizenparticipationindecisionmakingandPPPinfundingandmanaging,canalsoalso betheconstructiveinstrumentsforexperimentalplanningprogrammes.Privateenterprises andvoluntaryorganizationsareableto beproperpartnersforthegovernmenttocarrying outsuchefforts.Successfulexperimentscanbenefit,andfailed experimentswon’tharmthe wholesociety.Thishasaspecialpracticalmeaningforcitiesunderpopulationandemploy ment pressureindevelopingcountrieslikeChina.

AreChinesepoliticalandlegalenvironmentsopentocivilsociety’sparticipationinplan ning practice?Thiswillbediscussedinthefollowingsection.

119 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

4.4 Civil society’s participation in China’s law and political statements

Amongthegreatchangesoccurringonalllevelsofthecountrysince1978’sreform,one important change is that the government gradually reduced the scope and degree of its intervention in public affairs, thus expanding the selforganising capacity of the non governmental spheres, which is officially called “societal sphere” (Chinese: 社会领域). Alreadyinthe mid80's, the central government started the socalled “small government, large society” effort aimed toward mobilizing the strength outside the government to participateinthemanagementoftheeconomyandsociallife.Followingthis,thepoliticsof China have continuously made progress for civil society’s participation in the planning relatedissues.

4.4.1 Citizen participation in the decision-making of planning TheLawonUrbanPlanningofP.R.China(1990version)regulatesthat“themunicipal governmentshallproclaimtheurbanplanningonceithasbeenapproved” (Rule28).Thisis thefirstnationalplanninglawmentioningpublicinformingsince1949.[83]

“TheMethodsofShandongProvinceImplementingtheLawonUrbanPlanningofP.R. China”, which has been put in practice since 1991, states: “The government shall widely consultthecitizensandexpertsforcompilingurbanplan,differentplanningproposalsshall becompared,andeconomyandtechniqueissuesshallbeopenlyexamined.” (Rule12)This statement extended public involvement from informing to compiling procedure in urban planning,presentinganearlierexampleofparticipationinlocallaw.[84]

On the Beijing Planning Conference hold on September 11th, 2000, Yu Zhengsheng (MinisterofChineseConstructionMinistry19982001andformermayorofQingdao 1989 1994)argued: “Urban planning is related to public interests. If only relied on the minority handling urban planning, planning can easily deviate from the right direction and may cause damages to the environment, natural scenery and cultural heritage. Without public involvement it will be hard to protect the substantial public interests. Thus, public involvementincompilingandimplementingprocessofplanningmustbestrengthened, whichalsoincludessupervisingthemunicipalgovernmentandthe mayor”.[85]

In2000,theChineseConstructionMinistryissuedapplicationandselectionmethodfor NationalLivingEnvironmentAwards,and“communitymanagementandpublicinvolvement”

120 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

wasoneofthe18selectingcriteria.

InApril2006,theChineseConstructionMinistryamended“CompilingMethodsforUrban Planning” issuedinSeptember1991,regulatingthaturbanplanningshould adheretothe rule of “governmental organization, professional leading, departmental cooperation, public participation,andscientificdecisions”.[86]Thiswasthefirstappearanceoftheterm“partici pation” innationallawonurbanplanningintheP.R.China.

ToexpandthedegreeofpublicparticipationonLegislation,onApril22nd,2004,the ChineseStateCouncilissued“ImplementationProgramforPromotingLegalAdministration”. Itregulates: “Administrativedepartmentsshouldopenlyandattentivelycollect opinionsfromcitizens, judicialpersonsandotherorganizationsexceptforconfidential nationalinformation, businesssecretsandprivacyinformation;legalprocessshouldbestrictlyfollowed; citizen’srightsofknowinghowshouldbeprotected… Thegovernmentaladministrative systemshouldintegratepublicinvolvementandprofessionalexaminationtoensurethe qualityofdecisionmaking.” [87]

This “Implementation Program” issued by the Chinese State Council put forward re questsforpublicinvolvementonnationalandlocallegislation, anditisanimportantlawfor enhancingparticipationrelatedlegislationinurbanplanning.

AttheNationalConstructionConferenceholdinSeptember2005,WangGuangtao,pre sentMinisterofChineseConstructionMinistry,states: “Thecontentandmethodofformulatingurbanmasterplanneedimprovement;plan ning requireswideconsultationofrelevantdepartments,expansionofpublicparticipa tion andenhancementoftransparency.Everyprovinceshouldestablishplanningcon sultation systemincludingexpertmeetingandcitizeninvolvement initscitiesandcoun ties.Thosecitieswhoseurbanmasterplanareapprovedbythe StateCouncil should expand their scope of transparent planning administration on the internet, make the planninginformationavailableforthecitizens,and build effective channels for public supervision.Othercitiesshouldalsograduallystartthiswork."[88]

The China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, whichwasestablishedin1992bytheStateCounciloftheGovernmentofChinatosupport the cooperation between China and the international community in the fields of environment

121 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

anddevelopment,stated inits FourthMeetingoftheThirdPhaseholdinNovember,2005: “AsChinamakesthetransitiontoamarketeconomy,itneedstochoosewhattocontroland whattoleavetothemarketstoaddress;italsoneedstobuildplatformsforpublicparticipa tion and for addressing human rights. Transparency and public involvement are the best watchdogsagainstbriberyandcorruption”,and,“ArevisionoftheLawonUrbanPlanningis recommendedwherebythereissupportfortheconcerteddevelopmentofbig,mediumand smallcitiesandtowns,thereisaddedstipulationforpublicparticipationinurbanplanning, and there is no contradiction with other relevant laws… Public participation in decision makingforurbanplanning,aswellasfortransportationinfrastructuresshouldbepromo ted.” [89]TheseargumentsshowthattheChinesecentralgovernmentisawareoftherole ofpublicparticipationasthe“watchdog” forplanningadministrationandthenecessityto enhanceitthroughtheplanninglaws.

OnFebruary14th,2006,theStateCouncilpublished“DecisionsonScientificDevelop ment of Enhancing Environmental Protection”. It states that “(the authority) should implementthepublishingsystemoftheenvironmentalquality,regularlypublishtheenviron mentalprotectionindexofeachprovinceandcity...informenvironmentalaccidentsintime andcreateapublicparticipationmechanism.” [90]

TheStateEnvironmentalProtectionAdministrationofChina(SEPAC)officiallypublished “Temporary Public Involvement Measures for Environmental Evaluation” on March 14th, 2006.Thisrequiresthatthepublic’srightofknowingtheinformationshouldbeprotected, andtheparticipationofeverystakeholdershouldbemobilized.Firstly,itparticularlyregu lates thattheconstructioninstitutionandenvironmentalprotectiondepartmentareobliged tomaketheenvironmentalinformationavailabletothepublicand consultthe public. The formsofpublicparticipation publicsurvey,professionalconsultations,hearingsanddemon stration meetingsshouldbeimplemented.Secondly,itdefinestherequirementsforthe3 stagesofinformationpublication:atthebeginning stageof the Environmental Evaluation (EE),theconstructioninstitutionshouldpublishthenameoftheprojectandrelevantinfor mation;atthedevelopingstageoftheEE,theconstruction institution should publish the informationofscope,degreeandmainprecautionarymeasuresofpossibleinfluencestothe environment;atthefinalstageofExaminationandApproval(EA),itrequiresthatthecon struction institutionsshouldattachtheexplanationsabouteitheradmissionsorrejectionsof thepublicopinionstotheEAreport.ViceMinisteroftheSEPAC,PanYue,proclaimedthatit isthefirstofficialdocumentonpublicparticipationintheChineseenvironmentalprotection

122 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

field,whichabidesbytheruleofpublicity,equality,widerange,andconvenience.[91]

Inbrief,sincethe1990's,China’sgovernmenthasstartedtoattachimportancetothe involvementofthecitizensinplanningrelatedadministration,andthemainpurposesofthis new change include enhancing the transparency of the administration and ensuring the channel of public advice and supervision. Although such progress has not yet started to enablethecitizens“sharethepower” withtheauthority,thecitizensaregettingmorepower ofspeakingintheplanning.

4.4.2 PPP for funding and managing Sincethemid1990's,somelocalgovernmentshavebeentryingacooperativemodelof usingnongovernmentalinvestmenttodeveloppublicutilitiesinordertoovercomethelong time difficulties of governmental investment of public facilities. Since 2000, the central government,especiallythoseadministrativedepartmentsmainlyinchargeofinvestmentand urbanconstruction,tookafurtherstepbypublishingpoliciesandregulations,andencoura ged nonpublicownedcapitaltobeusedfortheconstruction,exerciseandmanagementof themunicipalpublicutilities.

WangGuangtao,presentministeroftheChineseConstructionMinistry,spokeatthena tional constructionconferenceinFebruary,2002,that“inordertoimplementthepolicyof expandingdomesticdemandandacceleratingdevelopmentof constructionwork,manage ment reformofurbaninfrastructureandmunicipalpublicfacilitiesshouldbeenhanced… (the city should) mobilize urban infrastructure assets to raise funds for financing urban con struction.”[92]

Later,theChineseMinistryofConstructionofficiallypublished “ConcessionaryAdminis tration Measures of Municipal Public Projects” on May 1st, 2004. It regulates that the governmenthastherighttoselectinvestorsandadministratorsformunicipalpublicutilities throughcompetition,definestherulesofadministratingaproductofmunicipalpublicutilities orprovidingaservice,includingwater,gas,heatingsupply,publictraffic,sewage treatment andwastedisposalinthecity.Anevaluationcommitteeshouldbeorganized;examinations and approvals should be done legally; the receiver of the concessionary right should be selectedthroughinquiriesandcompetitiveexaminations. The results of the bid should be showntothepublicforatleast20days.Itregulatesthatenterprisesare not allowedto abusetheconcessionaryrighttoadministratebytransferring or leasing, and are also not allowedtoabusethepublicassetsbydisposingormortgaging.Itisstipulatedthatthetime

123 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

limitationofconcessionaryrighttoadministrateshouldnotexceed30years.[93]

InOctober,2003,thePlenaryoftheCommunistPartyofChinaapproved“Decisionson SeveralIssuesaboutImprovingtheSocialistMarketEconomicSystem”,whichaddresses: a.Theaccessofnonstatecapitaltounrestrictedinfrastructurefacilities,publicutilities andotherfieldsshouldbesupported. b.Thereformofstatemonopolizedindustriesshouldbeaccelerated;marketaccessto suchindustriesshouldbeenabled,andcompetitionmechanismshouldbeestablished. c.Therailway,postalandurbanpublicutilitiesreformshouldbespedupandbesuper vised effectively.[94]

The Government Work Report given by China’s present Premier Wen Jiabao at the SecondSessionofthe10thNationalPeople’sCongressonMarch5th,2004,stated:“Market –orientedreformofmunicipalpublicutilitiesmustbepromoted… furtherstudiesshouldbe madefortherealisticmethodstoencouragenonstateownedenterprisestojoinreorgani zation andreconstructionprocessesofstateownedenterprisesandtoenterthefieldofin frastructure,publicutilitiesandotherindustries.”[95]

AStateCouncil’s document, “Supporting and Guiding the Development of Nonpublic Economy”,issuedinFebruary2005,states: “Nonpublic capitals are allowed access to the public utilities and infrastructure field. (Theauthorityshould)acceleratethefranchisingsystemofthegovernment,regulate biddingbehaviors,supportnonpubliccapitalstoinvestinthemunicipalpublicutilities and infrastructures, encourage nonpublic enterprises to participate in the reform of municipal public enterprises and institutions… allow nonpublic capital access to the socialutilitiesfield,support,guideandregulate nonpublic investment in the nonfor profitandprofitorientedsocialutilities,suchaseducation,science research, health, culture,sportsandetc.Liberalizethemarketaccess,strengthenthegovernmentaland social supervisions and safeguard public interests. Support nonpublic economy to participateintherestructuringandreorganizingofthe publicowned enterprises.” [96]

124 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

Fig.415 China’s PremiereWenJiabao encouragesprivatebodies toenterinfrastructurebuilding

InSeptember,2005,“ChineseUrbanPublicUtilitiesGreenBook1— ChineseTrialof PublicPrivate Cooperation Systems”, coedited by Yu Hui, researcher in the Industry and Economy Research Centre of the Social Science Institute of China and Qin Hong, deputy director in the Policy Research Centre of the Ministry of Construction, was published by Shanghai People’s Publishing House. It is the first official report about China’s domestic publicutilitiesdevelopment.Withthereviewoftheexperiences andlessonsfromtheten year progress of publicprivate cooperation, it forecasts perspectives for municipal public utilitiesdevelopmentandofferssuggestionsonpolicy.(Yu,H.andQin,H.,2005)

Another document of the State Council, “Opinions on Strengthening and Improving CommunityService(2006)”,statesinRule14,“(Theauthorityshould)supportthestrengths of all levels of the society, utilize vacant facilities, houses and other resources to initiate trade,catertobusiness, employment, medical treatment, recycle waste, andservice net workrelevanttothepeople’slivelihood,andprotecttheirrightsandinterests.”[97]

125 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

The Chinese “11th FiveYearPlan of National Economic and Social Development”, approvedinMarch,2006,statesinChapter42:“(Theauthorityshould)developandsupport industrialassociations,institutions,publiccharitiesandcitizenorganizations,exerttheirfun ctions ofprovidingservices,reflectingpeople’sdemands and regulating social behaviours. Theselfdisciplinedmechanismofnongovernmentalorganizationshouldbeimproved.” [98]

In short, similar to the issue of citizen participation, the publicprivate partnership concerningurbanenvironmenthasalsobeenstronglyadvocatedby theChineseauthority since the 1990's. This new development shows both the great social demands on public service, and the pragmatic style of the Chinese authority on tackling with the role of thenongovernmentalparticipantsinthetraditionallystatedominatedservicedomains.

126 PartII.Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’splanning

4. Civilsociety’sparticipationinplanningtheoryandinChina’slawandpoliticalstatements

4.5 Summary

Inthischapter,theanalysisoftheWesternconcept of civil society and the ongoing ChinesesocialtransitiondeducestheunderstandingofcivilsocietyintheChinesecontext:it referstothesphereofindividuals,familiesandhouseholds, of citizen’s organisations and publiccommunications,andofthenongovernmentalbody’snonforprofitinvolvementfor theprovisionofthepublicservicesbetweenthestateandthemarket.

The studies of the autonomyrelated traditions in Chinese history shows that civil societyisrootedintheowncultureofChina;therealityoftheChinesecontemporarysociety indicatesthatthemoderncivilsocietyofChinaisgrowing.

The review of citizen participation in decisionmaking and publicprivate partnership withcivilsociety’seffortsinplanningtheoryshowstheimportanceofintegrating the“third power” inimprovingplanningperformance.

Therehasbeenplentyevidenceshowing,thattheChinesegovernmenthasrealisedthe significance of civil society’s participation in planning and has started to promote it. The major measures include empowering the citizens in planning decisions and mobilize the strengthofprivatebodiestoimprovetheefficiencyofplanningrelatedservice.Althoughitis stillattheanearlyphase,theeffortsoftheauthorityaiming atintegratingthe“bottomup” strength in planning is getting stronger. Many participatory elements, which can not be foundinChinabeforethe1980's,hasbeenbecomingformalcomponentsofurbanplanning intheunprecedentedurbantransitioninChina.Thisnewdevelopmentprovidesnecessary legitimacy of the main hypothesis of this research, that civil society’s participation could promotetheplanningresultinQingdao ofthecontemporaryage.

JohannW.Goethewrites: “Gray,myfriend,iseverytheory, andgreenalonelife'sgoldentree.” [99]

Doescivilsociety’sparticipation function for achievingbetterplanningperformancein theChinesecities?Thefollowingattemptstoansweritwithparticularcasestudies.

127 Communicationinthepark 128 129 130 Part II. Civil society’s participation in planning theory and its potential for Qingdao’s planning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice: threecasestudies

131 132 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

5. Civil society’s participation in China’s planning practice: three case studies

IncontemporaryChina,theplanningpracticeswithcivilparticipationarealsoemerging, andKaiTak ProjectinHongKong,theResourceRecoveryProjectinShenyang andthe Taidong ProjectinQingdao arethreerepresentativecases.

5.1 ’s Kai Tak Project

Untiltheendof1990's,thedecisionmakinginHongKong’splanninghadastrongelite oriented feature like that on the mainland. The Town Planning Board was the supreme institutefortheformulationofurbanplanning,anditsmembers weremainlyofficialsfrom the government and some economic or social elites. Before reunification the dominant figuresweremostlyfromBritain.Peopleusedtocriticisethatthetransparencyinplanning wasinsufficient,planningdecisionusuallybenefitedtodevelopersmorethanthepublic,the government had done little to improve socialwelfare, etc. Planning in Hong Kong before 1997provedDengXiaoping’sfamousargument“(old)HongKong’spoliticalsystemisneither that of the Britain nor that of the United States”. During the years shortly after the reunification, citizen participation in Hong Kong was usually limited to the level of public hearing. In order to prevent new projects from destroying historic heritage, natural environment, community interests, etc., people often launched demonstrations. In such context, the Kai Tak Project started in 2004 belongs to the initial planning practice with broadcitizenparticipationinthecity’shistory.

Locatedinthenorthbankof Bay,thelandofKaiTak wasoriginallyusedas theairportfortheBritishRoyalAirForceoftheU.K.,laterforHongKong’scivilairportafter WordWarII.SincethecompletionofHongKong’sNewInternationalAirportatChek Lap Kok in1998,KaiTak AirportbecameapartofHongKong’smemory,andtheeconomicvi tality oftheneighbouringareaislargelydecreased.Inthe1990's,thegovernmentputfor wardsseveralprogrammes,aninfluentialoneofwhichwastomakeKaiTak intoanewtown covering505hawith240,000to340,000residentsbymassivelyfillingtheseasurface.All thegovernmentalproposalswereopposedbythecitizensandeventuallyabandoned.Many citizensandmorethan100privatecorporationsappealedtothegovernmenttostrictlycon trol thecommercialdevelopmentofthecoastalareastrictlyandprovideamoreconvenient,

133 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

moreaccessiblepublicspace.

Under such circumstances, the government decided to involve the public into the decisionmakingofurbanplanning.TheHarbourfrontEnhancementCommittee(HEC)was established the delegates including planning and environment experts, local residents, corporationsandnongovernmentalgroups.Itsfunctionistoprovidetheplatformfor citizen participation in the planning of Kai Tak (HEC, 2004). The Kai Tak Project consists of 3 phases,namelytheInceptionPhase,theReviewPhaseandthePlanPreparationPhase,and each integrates particular content from citizen participation. As a precondition for the participation,thegovernmentopenedallrelevanttechnicalmaterialsandexistingfeasibility studiestothepublic.

TheInceptionPhasestartedinJuly2004,aimingat1)collaboratingplanninginforma tion and data and 2) identifying constraints, opportunities and key issues. The organiser attemptedtoengagethepublicindeterminingthevisionandthe keyissues.Morethan500 citizenstookpartinthisphasepersonally,andthegovernmentreceivedabout240written opinions. During the 2month public participation programme, very extensive public commentswerereceived,andallofthemwerecollectedandpublishedbytheorganiserfor thenextplanningphase.

CitizenswhoparticipatedinthefirstphaseestablishedmostitemsofthePlanningPrin ciples,whichinclude:peopleorientedplanning concept; integrated land use, environment and transport planning approach; bringing harbour to the people; protection of views to ridgeline;gradationofbuildingheightsatthewaterfront;retainlocalcultureandhistorical past.Also,thegovernmentalexpertsreinforcedtheprincipalswiththefollowing:turningKai Tak intoHongKong’sshowcaseforgoodlandscapingandurbandesign;promotingKaiTak asahubforsports,recreation,tourism,entertainmentandqualityhousing;integratingKai Tak with the surrounding areas; providing opportunities for revitalizing the surrounding districts.

Following this, the Review Phase aimed at reviewing current proposals, considering alternativeconceptsadvancedbythecitizengroupsandformulatingoutlineconceptplans. Thepurposeofcitizenparticipationwasto“engagethepublicindeterminingvisionsandkey issues” (HEC).Onecitylevelandthreedistrictlevelpublicforumswereorganisedbesides three subjectoriented forums, and after that the City Planning Board held an open conferencetoconsolidatetheforumresults.Inthefollowing,three“planningteams” were

134 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

builtbytheCitizenswhosupportedasimilarscheme.Withthecooperationofgovernmental planners,eachteamworkedonprovidingprofessionalplanresults.Thisprocesswasquite similartoacompetitionbetweenvariousarchitecturaloffices,withthedifferencebeingthat theplannersconsistofboththecitizens who well understand Kai Tak through their own experience and the experts who helped enhance the citizen’s strength and turn it into professionalresults.Thethreemainconceptscontributedbythe citizenexpertteamswere: a.CityinthePark,whichemphasisesthedevelopmentofahighqualitylivingdistrictin aparklikeenvironment; b.KaiTak Glamour,whichemphasisestheenhancementofaniconicandvividmetro politan waterfrontdistrict; c.SportsbytheHarbour,whichemphasisesthepromotionofsportsandrecreationas thehighlightofthisarea.

Theplanningschemescombiningthecreativityofcitizensandexpertsthrough“compe tition” presentshighquality,anditsexhibitionbecameaverypopular eventforthewhole city.

The“PlanPreparationPhase”,whichfollowsthe“the Review Phase”, focused on the formulationofthe“preliminaryoutlinedevelopmentplan” basedonthepublicopiniononthe threeplanningconceptsmentionedabove.Inthe springof2006,asthispaperisshortly beforeitscompletion,thisphaseisstillgoingon.

135 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

Fig.51ThescenesoftheKaiTakProject anda collaborativeconcept “CityinthePark”

136 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

5.2 Shenyang’s Resource Recovery Project

Let’s shift our perspective from Hong Kong to the mainland. The following ‘Research ProjectonResourceRecoveryandUtilisationofBioorganicMunicipalWaste(RRUBMW)in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, is a pilot project based on SinoGerman cooperation, and meanwhileitisalsoapublicprivatepartnershippractice.Theparticipantsincludenotonly the publicowned Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, the Liaoning Science & ResearchProgramme,BauhausUniversityWeimarandSchaeferCompanyandBrendebach ConsultantsofGermany,RABEngineeringofAustria,butalsothe residentsandtheGreen Liaoning,aVolunteerEnvironmentalProtectionAssociationofChina.

In China, most municipal solid waste (MSW) is tipped into landfill sites or dumping placeswithoutpriortreatment.Peoplehaverealised,thatthroughpropermeasuresnotonly willenvironmentalthreatscausedbybiodegradablematerialscontainedinMSWbereduced, but also renewable energy source and fertilizers can be produced. The RRUBMW is just initiatedfromthiscontext,anditstargetisto“assessthepossibilitiestoapplytheapproach ofbiotechnologicalprocessingofsourceseparatedBMWwithinaChineseintegratedwaste managementconcept” (Raninger,B.,Bidlingmaier,W.andLi,R.D.,2006).

Toengagethepublic,aseriesofcommunicationstrategiesareestablished,including:

Informationmeetingsfor publicinstitutionsandeachofthepilotareasinvolved,dis tribution ofpaperandEversionhandouts; Informationleafletsshowinghowtocarryoutsourceseparationandtousethenew tools; Opinionsurveysduringtheinformationmeetings,withthegeneralpublicnotinvolvedin theprojectandwithprojectparticipantsafterprojectcompletion; AuthorisationdocumentsignedbytheShenyang InstituteofAeronauticsandthelocal residentialcommunitiestoenablethestudentstoassistthehouseholds; Massmedia coverageof6majorlocalTVchannels,radiochannelsandnewpapers, TelephonehelplinetothepublicresearchinstitutionsandGreenLiaoning, Followupcommunicationwiththosehouseholdswhichdonotparticipateproperly; Exhibitionofprojectresultsinthepilotareasandawardingof mostsuccessful householdsinwitheventssponsoredby5publicandprivateinstitutions;etc.(Ibid.,pp.3)

137 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

Fig.52Publicinformation,massmediacoverageaspartofcomprehensive CommunicationstrategyinShenyang’sresource recoveryProject

Withthejointadvocacyofthelocalgovernmentandtheinternationalteamofexperts, 5pilotareasinHuanggu andDongling districts,andapproximately600residentshavepar ticipated intheBMWcollection.Statisticsshowtheyarehighlymotivated,andtheircom municative strategiesaresuccessful:thewillingnesstoparticipateactivelyinsourcesepara tion wasincreasedfrom86%in2005to97%in2006.BMWcollectedviaprimarysourcese paration (PSS)duringoneyearfrom595persons(97%participation)amountstoabout84 kg/ca.onaverage,muchmorethanthe61kg/ca.measuredin2004 duringapretestwith 10.families.(Ibid.,pp.8)Basedonthebroadengagementofcitizens,theexpertsareableto acquire accurate data to assess the quantity and quality of BMW generated by different ways of collection methods, making recommendations for a most appropriate BMW treatmenttechnology,andanproposaloftheeconomicandfinancialimplications.

Sincethebeginningoftheprojectin2004,thelocalresidentsandcitizenorganisation Green Liaoning have been offering great cooperation and support to the experts; mean while, both scientific strength and the environmental consciousness in Shenyang are

138 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

promotedbytheexperts’ contribution.“Actually,manytasksarenotdifficult”,theAustrian expertBernhardRaninger says,“Whatisdifficultishowtoestablishthecontactwiththe residents.Weneedcommunication.Whencommunicationisgood,we aresuretoachieve success”.(NortheastNews,2005)

Tab.3Theresidents’ answerto “areyouwillingtoparticipateintherecyclingproject?” beforeandafterthefirstphase

ThepartnershipbetweenAustrian,GermanandChineseexperts,diversifiedinstitutions, localauthority,residentsand students hasachieved satisfying results, and the RRUBMW projectisincreasinglygainingattentionbothinChinaandabroad.Also,motivatedbythe positivefeedbackfromtheparticipatinghouseholdsthelocalgovernmentandtheresident communitieshaveexpressedtheirwishtoexpandtheprojectinthefuture.

139 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

5.3 Qingdao’s Taidong Project

Next,let’sshiftfromShenyang toQingdao foralocalPPPexample,thefacaderenewal projectofTaidong.

Taidong area,asmentionedintheintroductionofQingdao’s history,wasoriginallyone ofthetwoworker’sdistrictsplannedbytheGermans.Withthecontinuousurbanexpansion alongtherailwaytothenorthTaidong hasbecomeaconnectionnodebetweenthesouth andthenorth.Thisgeographicaladvantagebringsamassiveflux ofpeopleandenhances theprosperityoftrade,shoppingandotherservices.Amongthefourcommercialcentresin Qingdao (also Zhongshan Road, centre of the new eastern area and Licun Commercial Area),Taidong isthemostattractiveoneformanyoldQingdaoers.

The facade renewal project of Taidong is one of the governmental beautification projects in the context of the Water Sports of 2008’s Olympic Games, held in Qingdao. Beforethe1980'sseverallargescaledslumswerescatteredinTaidong,andmostofthem werereplacedby“boxlike” industrialisedhouseswith 6or 7storiesthroughthe housing renewalinthe1980'sandthe1990's.Theparallelhousesareoftenconnectedwithvertical unitsontheside,whichcreatesa“semiblock” structureandsupportsthetradealongthe streets.LikeintheZhongshan Roadarea,“livingupstairsandshoppingdownstairs” isalso quitepopularhere.However,thefacadesofmanyhousesalongthemainpedestrianstreet turnedshabbyquicklybecauseofthecheapmaterialsused.

Forthedistrictgovernment,timeandfinancewerebothverylimited.Howtodoagood job? According to the routine of architectural competition, much time is needed for both design and evaluation. Besides, a massive renewal might affect the daily life and the commercialfunctionoftheTaidong area.Thus,theexpertsofChineseConstructionScience InstitutewereinvitedtoQingdao foradvice.ChiefArchitectandArtistGu Yunrui believes thatusingmuralpaintingtorenewthefacadesalongthemainstreetisasoundsolution. (Gu,Y.R.andXu,X.M.,2004)

Muralpaintingforthebeautificationoftheurbanenvironmenthasalongtradition.In the20thcentury,countrieslikeMexico,theUSAandFrancehadmanypracticesofmural paintingonpublicbuildingsbasedongovernment– artistpartnership,andthemuralartin the French city Lyon has gained great reputation for its creativity. However, for a 1km centralstreetwith60,000sqm facade,thewholeprojectcostswouldbeabout100million

140 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

RMBconcerning the market price, and this was not affordable using the district budget. After a careful study together with the experts, the government decided to launch the projectwiththejointeffortsofthegovernmentandthevoluntaryartists.

Afterpublishingtheprojectinformation,morethan30professorsandteachersfromthe artschoolsof7universitiesgatheredinQingdao andformedavolunteerteam.Thedistrict governmentprovidedallservicesandmaterialsneededbytheartists,andtheartistswere enabledtohavefullfreedomonstyles,motifsandworkingmethods.Inthisteamtherewas also a retired professor from Shandong Fine Art institute, who also painted for hours on thescaffoldingunderthesummersun.

Fig.53ThemuralprojectofTaidongcommercialarea

141 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

Notonlydidtheartistsinvestgreateffortsindesigning,they alsotreatedtheresidents’ opinionsseriously.Gu mentioned:“Onthefacadeofabuildingweplannedonpaintinga lovelycat.Aresidentwenttousandsaid,ifwepaintacaton herhousehersonwouldbe scared,becausetheboywasbornintheChinese‘Mouse’ Year.Afterhearingthisourteam had a discussion immediately. Since we all believe public art should carefully respect people’svariouscustomsandtaboos,themotivewaschangedtoasunflower… Wetryour best to interact with citizens. What we attach great importance to is not only our own creativitybutalsothepeople’sfeelings”.(Gu,Y.R.,Xu,X.M.,2004,pp.32)

Thecitizenshadaheateddiscussiononthisprojectinnewspapers,TVandinternet. Onecitizenstates:“Ifindmywhitefloorwallverynice.Whyshouldthecitypaintsuchdoo dle alongthestreet?” (Hu,J.H,2004).Someworriedthattheraincouldscourthepaintings intomiserablebands.Nevertheless,mostcommentssupportthisproject.Manycitizenswere attractedtoTaidong toseethedevelopmentofthisproject,andmanyofthemtriedtoex changetheiropinionswiththeartists.Thededicationofthevolunteerartistshadimpressed thepublicverymuch.Untiltoday,whenaskedbythevisitorsabouthowtheartistspainted, manyresidentscanstilltellalotofwhattheysawandwhattheyheard.

Theprojecthasbecomeagiantexperimentforpublicart,andalsoforPPPpracticein urban regeneration. While this cooperation between the governments and the volunteer artistswasbroadlyrecognised,thegovernmenthassavedmuchtimeandmoney.Sinceits competitiononJuly7th,2004,ithasbeenthelargestmuralpaintingprojectinChinaand attractedtheattentionofvariousnewspapers,TVchannelsandmagazines.Itwasreported thatsomeothercities,includingBeijing,alsoattempttolaunchsimilarprojectsreferringto Taidong’s experience.Thisprojectisnowintheapplication process for a Guinness World Record. With its new look, Taidong become a more attractive commercial area. Through openingthe“nightmarket”,thedistrictgovernmentcreatesnewopportunitiesforworking andleisure.Taidong’s pedestrianstreethas also turned into another tourist highlight be sidesthosemostlyinQingdao’s southerndistricts.

142 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

5. Civilsociety’sparticipationinChina’splanningpractice:threecasestudies

5.4 Summary

Inbrief,thesethreecasestudies– fromthe“developedcity” HongKongtothe“deve lopingcity” Shenyang andQingdao– areabletoverifythatcivilsociety’sparticipationisa realisticmeasuretoreinforcetheChineseplanningperformance under present conditions. Commonexperiencesconsistof:

a.Sufficient governmental facilitation is the precondition of a successful participatory practice.Atpresentthegovernmentisstillplayingthedominantroleintheconstructionand managementoftheChinesecities,andthismakesastrongpushpossiblefortheintegration of “bottomup” efforts in the planning domain through the governmental initiatives. The governmentistheessentialenablerfortheparticipatorypracticeinChina.

b.To combinethe strengthof the government and civilsocietyinplanning,planners shouldplaytheroleasthemoderatorsandmediatorsapartfromastechnicalexperts.The moderationofplanningexpertsisakeyfactorforactivatingcivilsocietyinplanningpractice, who has already a high motivation for improving the urban environment through their efforts.

Inthenextchapter,theauthorwillputforwardrecommendations forpromotingQing dao’s planningperformancethroughparticipatorymeasures.

143 Taidongcommercialarea 144 145 146 Part II. Civil society’s participation in planning theory and its potential for Qingdao’s planning

6. RecommendationforCivilSociety’sparticipationinQingdao’s urbanplanning:“FoundationofCollaborativeUrbanSolutions”

147 148 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

6. RecommendationforCivilSociety’sparticipationinQingdao’s urbanplanning

6. Recommendation for Civil Society’s participation in Qingdao’s urban planning: “Foundation of Collaborative Urban Solutions”

Civil society’s participation in planning processes is new in China. Although Chinese politicianshavestartedtostressitrecently,thereisstillinsufficientpracticalexperienceand academicresearchinChineseplanning.Forabetterqualityofplanning,theChinesecities needmoreinitiativestomobilizecivilsociety’sstrengthintheplanningpractice,aswellas moresupporttoenrichtherelatedresearch.

Therefore,thisthesisproposesthatQingdao’s authorityandcivilinitiativesestablishthe “Foundation of Collaborative Urban Solutions”. The foundation itself is a partnership be tween thegovernmentandcivilsociety,andissponsoredbothbygovernmentalsubsidyand the donation of individual citizens, citizens’ groups and private enterprises. As a nonfor profitfoundationitsparticulartargetis:1)tomoderateandfacilitatethe strengthofcivil societyinQingdao toimprovethecity’scapacitytocopewithurbanproblems,aswellas2) topromotetheacademicresearchofcivilsociety’sparticipationintheplanningdomainof China.

Theplanningmoderatorsandtheadvisoryboardarethetwomajor componentsofthe foundation.Theplanningmoderatorsarebuiltupmainlyfromplanners alsoinfluentialse nior planners– andvolunteerarchitecturalstudents,andactivistsfromthecitizenswhoare trainedwithnecessaryplanningknowledge.Theadvisoryboardis made up of prominent professorsandexpertsfromthefieldsofurbanplanning,architecture,sociology,humanity, whoarewillingtodedicatehis(orher)strengthstothepromotionofQingdao’s urbanen vironment. The planning moderators arein charge of organising participatory events and moderatingactivities.Besidesthis,theywillarrangesitevisitsorprojectrelatedexcursions ledbyexperts,aswellascasualculturalorentertainmentevents helpingpeoplesocialize andalsobuildtrustandfamiliaritywithothersinvolved.While theadvisoryboard,likeits name,offerssupervision,particularknowhow,andcommentsandcritiquesontheparticipa tory practiceofthefoundation.Boththeadvisoryboardandplanningmoderatorsareres ponsible forofferingtrainingprogrammesforthevoluntarycitizensand students,andlec tures orseminarstothepublicforimprovingtheknowledgeandconsciousnessofthepar ticipatory planning.Besidesthis,throughdialogue,designofthemeeting space,interactive service, etc., the foundation provides a comfortable, homelike persontoperson and persontospaceatmosphereforeachparticipant.

149 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

6. Civilsociety’sparticipationintheplanningpractice

6.1 The principles

Toenablethefoundationtoefficientlyandconfidentlyadvocate fortheparticipationof civilsocietyinplanning,thefollowingprinciplesneedtobesetup.

a.Transparentmanagement Thefoundationrunsunderthesupervisionofthepublic,whichpreventstheparticipa tion ofcivilsocietyfromturningintosuperficialactionsmanipulatedbyeconomicorpolitical powers.Itisresponsibleforpublishingitsactivitiesandbudgetstatusthoroughperiodical working reports, and all forums and workshops are accessible for citizens, citizen organi sation,andpublicmedia.Also,themembersoftheadvisoryboards,moderatorsandother keypersonnelare chosen throughtransparentproceduresandopen tothecritiqueofthe citizens.

b.Equaldialogue Allplanningproposalsoractionsofthefoundationarebasedon equalityofeachindi vidual participant.Thefoundationprovidesthestageforallinvolved governmental,civilso ciety ormarketbodiestoexpresstheiropinionregardlessofthepowertheyhold.Thesol utions arenotmadethrougha“Topdown” mechanismaccordingtocertainadministrative hierarchies, norarethey madethroughthe control of the market. Mutual understanding, interactionandcollaborationoftheparticipantspenetrateallplanningprocesses.

c.Professionalsupport Professional support is the precondition for equal dialogue. It means to offer profe ssional information,moderation,facilitationandtechnicalaidforall participantsinthepublic forums,workshopsandotherformsofparticipationorganisedbythefoundation.Moderators of,orthoseinvitedbythefoundationshouldhavebothknowledgeandpersonalexperience inconflictmanagementofplanningrelatedissues.Forefficientmoderationthefoundationis responsibletomakeallnecessaryplans,data,governmentaldocumentsandexistingevalu ations accessibleforallparticipants.

d.Mutuallybeneficial Thefoundationaimsatachievingamutuallybeneficialconsensusforplanningactions, which means, the interests of all involved bodies are taken seriously. Each citizen whose interestsareaffectedbytheplanninghastheabilitytoinfluenceplanningthroughtheirown participation,andheuristicmethodsareadoptedtofindsharedinterestsand negotiations

150 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

6. Civilsociety’sparticipationintheplanningpractice

amongtheindividualandcollectivebodiesinanefficientway.Noparticipants,regardlessof theirsocial,economic,or politicalstanding canmakehisinterestsurpassthosesharedby themajority.

e.Nonforprofit Itisafoundationservingthepublicinterest;itdoesnotaimatmaximizingprofitforit self.Itsoperationwillbefundedbygovernmentalsubsidyanddonationfromcivilsociety. Meanwhile,itdoesnotexcludeofferingincomerelatedservicestothemarketortothepu blic sector.Besidescoveringforitspersonneland organisational costs, the income of the foundationisusedforfinancingitsprogramsofimprovingpublicfacilities,socialutilities,and thelivingenvironmentofthedisadvantaged,etc.

6.2 The pilot projects and its approaches

AccordingtothedeficitsinQingdao’s spatialdevelopment,whicharediscussedinChap ter 3,thisthesissuggeststhefollowingfourpilotprojectsforthenearfuture.

6.2.1 The Community-based Housing Workshop Communitybasedhousingrenewalisabletoreducetheresettlementconflictandease thesocialtensionduetoincreasingspatialdifferentiation.Thefirstpilotprojectofthefoun dation, the Communitybased Housing Workshop, aimsat regeneratingthelivingenviron ment ofarundowncommunity,wheretheresidentswishtocooperatewiththefoundation withtheinputoflabourandinvestments.Besidestheplanningexpertsofthe foundation, theinvolvedbodiesofthisworkshopincludethecommunitymembers,delegatesofthego vernmental agencies,potentialprivateinvestors,voluntaryplannersandexperts,aswellas voluntarycitizenactivistsandstudents.

Intheinitiatingphase,thefoundation a.Establishesefficientcontactbetweenthefoundationandthecommunitymembers(if possible,setsupthesiteoffice),identifiestheparticularproblemsofthecommunitythrough technical examination and conversations, interviews and questionnaires, respecting local people’s“storytelling” aboutthecommunity’shistoryandcharacter. b.Informsthepublicoftheprogressoftheworkshopthroughnewspapers,TVandra dio reports,internetforum,etc.,toarousethesocialandgovernmentalattentiononcom

151 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

6. Civilsociety’sparticipationintheplanningpractice

munitybasedrenewal,aswellastoarousetheinterestofpotentialprivateinvestors. c. Mobilises the community members’ enthusiasm to improve their own environment withtheirownefforts,presentsthemthe successful communitybasedrenewal projectsin easytounderstandterms,andacquiresnecessarypoliticalsupportsfrom theauthority.

Thefacilitatingphase,thefoundation a.Developsboththepreliminaryarchitecturalplanfocusingontheimprovementofthe functionalandenvironmentalqualityofthebuilding,andthepreliminarybudgetconceptfor financetheprojectinarealisticwaytogetherwiththecommunitymembers, b.Arrangesthedialogsamongthecommunitymembers,thepotentialprivateinvestors andthefoundationonthepreliminaryplans,anddevelopsfurtherconceptstointegrateex ternal capitalbyofferingcertainexistingoraddedareasofthehousingblockforcommercial purposesoftheexternalinvestors(sufficientnegotiationwiththelocalresidentsarenece ssary). c.Presentsthearchitecturalschemeandthebudgetscheme,whichhavebeenagreed bythecommunitymembers,totheadvisoryboardofthefoundation,improvestheschemes withthereferenceofthefeedbackandcomments,andthenoffers themtotheauthorityfor implementation. d.Inthecasewhentheplanningschemeisapproved,thefoundationisinchargeofthe constructionactivityinthecommunityproviding stabletechnicalsupports.Allinternaland externalparticipantsareabletobethebuildersduringthereshapingandbuildingoftheir ownspace.

6.2.2 The Heritage Preservation Workshop ThemaindeficitsofQingdao’s heritagepreservationincludethedestructionofhistoric buildingsandthedeteriorationofhistoricdistricts.Thesecondpilotprojectofthefoundation, theHeritagePreservationWorkshopaimsatsuggestinganefficientsupervisionmechanism through jointefforts of the government and the civil society which protects the historical heritagefrombeingdestroyedintheurbanconstruction.Theinvolvedbodiesofthiswork shopencompassplannersandarchitects(includingretiredsenior planners),governmental officialsofrelateddepartments,voluntarycitizensandcitizens’ organisations,aswellasju dicial experts,scholars,andvolunteerstudents.

Intheinitiatingphase,thefoundation a.Utilizesvariousmeasurestostresstheculturalandeconomic valueofQingdao’s his

152 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

6. Civilsociety’sparticipationintheplanningpractice

toric heritage,andmakeinformationofhistoricalbuildingsanddistrictseasilyaccessibleto thepublic. b.ShowsthechallengethatQingdao’s heritagehasbeenfacingsincethe1980's,ex plains the national and local policies and laws concerning heritage preservation, and pre sents the experiences in other cities through lectures, TV programmes, information bro chures,leaflets,onlinedatabanks,etc. c.Carriesonsurveysthroughinterview,questionnairesandinformalmeetingswiththe localcitizens,citizens’ organisations,andgovernmentofficials,tourists,forpeople’sopinions onthesupervisionmechanismandalsoformoreattentiontowards heritagepreservation.

Inthefacilitatingphase,thefoundation a.Invitestherelatedgovernmentalofficials(especiallyfromQingdao’s UrbanPlanning Bureau,Qingdao’s CulturalBureau,etc.),citizenactivists,architecturalandplanningexperts, delegatesofcitizens’ organisations,andsoon,totakepartinopendialogsandoffersprofe ssional moderationtosynthesistheopinions. b.Developsthemainopinionsraisedintheopendialogsintowellformulatedsugges tions throughfacilitatingthejointeffortsofthefoundationandotherinvolvedparties. c.Presentsthesuggestionstotheadvisoryboardofthefoundationandalsotoallciti zens throughpublicmedia,modifiesthemwithsoundcritiques,andthenoffersthemtothe governmentfortheapprovalforapoliticalaction.

6.2.3 The Public Space Forum Therestrictionofaccessibilityandthedeclinationoftheecologicfunctionhavebeenthe maindeficitsofthedevelopmentofpublicspaceinQingdao.Thefoundation’sthirdpilotpro ject,the“publicspaceforum”,isaimingattacklewithsuchdeficitwiththecreativityofboth thecivilsocietyandthegovernment.Whichparksordistrictsarethetargetspacesistobe decidedthroughthesuggestionofthecitizensorthegovernment.Sincethequalityofpublic spaceisanessentialissueforthequalityofeveryone’sdailylifethustotheproductivityand vitalityofthecity,theforumparticipantsincludenotonlytheonesfromthespaceusers– the citizensofallsocialgroupsinQingdao,butalsothedelegatesofthegovernmentalagencies andvariousstateownedorprivateenterprises.

Intheinitiatingphase,thefoundation a.Providesrelatedinformationofthechosenplace plans,data,historicmaterials,pub lished articles, governmental documents accessible for all participants through information

153 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

6. Civilsociety’sparticipationintheplanningpractice

brochures,leaflets,onlinedatabanks,etc. b.Makestheinformationandnecessaryplanningknowledge,participationregulations understandablefortheparticipantsthroughinformationmeetings,internetBBSforums,tele phonehotlines,lectures,andtheaidsofthevoluntarystudents. c.Identifiesthemainconcernsoftheparticipantsthroughinterviews,questionnaires andinformalmeetingswiththecitizens especiallythosewhohavemorerelationswiththe chosenplaceintheirdailylife,tourists,andcitizens’ organisations.

Inthefacilitatingphase,thefoundation a.Invitesboththegovernmentalofficialswhoareinchargeofthemanagementorcon struction with the chosen place, and users (and also potential users) from various social backgrounds,totakepartintheopenforums,andoffersprofessionalmoderationtosynthe sizetheopinions. b.Providesequalopportunityforallparticipantstoaddresstheiropinionthemaincon cerns,whichareraisedfromtheInitiatingPhase.Specialattentionisgiventoasktheedge groups theunemployed,thelabourimmigrants,thehandicappedandalso theyoungsters – togivetheirvoice. c. Develops the main opinions into professional planningschemes throughfacilitating thejointeffortsofthecitizensandplanners,orofthecitizensandthevoluntaryplanning students(whichcanbecombinedwithstudentplanningcompetition). d.Presentstheplanningschemesofthechosenspacebothtothe publicandtothead visory boardofthefoundation,improvesthemwiththereferenceofthefeedbackandcom ments,andthenoffersthemtotheauthorityforplanningactionsorpoliticalapproaches.

6.2.4 The Mass Transit Forum ThedeficitsoftheurbantransportationofQingdao lieontheoverloadoftheroadsys temandtheinsufficiencyofthepublictransportationcapacity, andthebuildingofthemass transitsystemisanexpectationofboththegovernmentandthecivilsocietyforimproving Qingdao’s traffic.Thefourthpilotprojectofthefoundation,the“MassTransitForum”,aims atraisingrealisticstrategyforfundingtherailbasedtrafficsystem. Thestrengthofthecivil society “thethirdpower” betweenthestateandthemarket shouldandisabletoplayan essentialroleinthefunding,andthishelpstoreducetherisk ofexcessivecontrolofpublic servicethroughthemarket. Thus, thedirectionof thefundingconceptisto mobilise the individual citizens and their households – to invest through purchasing stocks, like the MTRprojectforHongKong’sSubway.

154 PartII. CivilparticipationinplanningtheoryanditspotentialforQingdao’surbanplanning

6. Civilsociety’sparticipationintheplanningpractice

Intheinitiatingphase,thefoundation a.Offerstheexistinggovernmentalproposals,technicalandfinancialfeasibilitystudies, andthepublishedarticlesontheconstructionofmetroandthelightrailinQingdao forall participantsthroughinformationbrochures,leafletsandonlinedatabanks. b.Enhancethecitizens’ knowledgeaboutmasstransitthroughforumsinlocalnews papersorinternet,telephonehotlines,lectures,andthevoluntaryassistanceofthearchi tectural andengineeringstudents. c.Makespublicsurveysthroughinterviews,traditionalorinternetbasedquestionnaires withthecitizens,governmentalofficials,planningexperts,privateenterprises,etc.foridenti fying themainconcernsofthepeopleforthestockfundingconcept.

Inthefacilitatingphase,thefoundation a.Enablesthebaselevelgovernmentagency– thestreetofficetoacquiretheopinions ofthecommunitiesinitsadministrativeareawithmoderationsupports. b.Invitesthegovernmentalofficialsandplannerswhoareinchargeoftrafficplanning, citizendelegates,economicexpertstotakepartinopendiscussionsfortheiropinionsonthe particularprinciples,regulations,timeschedule,etc.,forraisingfundsfromthecivilsociety. c.Developsthemainopinionsintooneorseveralwellformulatedstockfundingpropo sals throughfacilitatingthecollaborationoftheexpertsandthecitizendelegates. d.Presentsthestockfundingproposal(s)ofthemassurbantransittoallcitizensand theadvisoryboardofthefoundation,improvestheschemeswiththereferenceofthefeed backandcomments,andthenoffersthemtotheauthorityforimplementationorpolitical approaches.

Although the manner of the foundation’s involvement can vary strongly according to particularsituations,itspracticehasthefollowingcommonfeatures:thegovernmentisno morethe“almightyfigure”,butactsaspromoterandparticipantofthecollaboration;the civilsocietyisnomorethepassive“bystander”,butactsasthecity’sbuilderthroughitsown effortsandcontributions;whiletheplannersarenomorethe“technocraticelites” butactas expertsmoderatingandsynthesizingthestrengthofthegovernmentandcivilsociety.The “FoundationofCollaborativeUrbanSolutions” isabletoimproveQingdao’s planningtocope withtheurbanproblemsthecityarefacinginitscontemporarydevelopment,aswellasto providevaluablereferenceforthefurtherresearchofcivilsociety’sparticipationinChinese urbanplanning.

155 CitizenparticipationinKaiTakProject 156 157 158 Summary.

159 160 Summary

Themainhypothesisofthisthesisisthatcivilsociety’sparticipationisabletoimprove theplanningresultsintheChinesecityofQingdao inthecontemporaryage.

Havinggrownrapidlyfromsmallfishermen’svillagestoamodernmetropolis,Qingdao’s planning history reflect a strong governmental influence. From 1897 to 1978, Qingdao’s urban construction had always been structured with a strong “topdown” system, which offeredhighefficiency,especiallyintheperiodsoftheGerman occupation(18971914),the firstJapaneseoccupation(19141921)andthefirstNationalisticgovernment(19291937). Apartfromthepoweroftheauthority,thenongovernmentalsphere,includingcitizens’ org anisations andbusinessassociations,also contributedmuchtothespatial developmentof Qingdao withtheeffortsfortheprotectionoftheTianhou Shrineinthe1910’s,thecriticism ontheplanningsituationinthe1930’s,andthebuildingoftheZhanshan Templefromthe 1930’sto1940’s,etc.

Since1978’sreformQingdao hasgreatlyimproveditsofurbanhousing,historicpreser vation,publicspaceandurbantraffic.Notonlythequantitybutalso thequalityofthecity’s urbanspacehasbeenrapidlyimproving.Thisnewimprovementresultsfromtheincreasing strengthofboththegovernmentandthemarket,whilethegovernment hasalwaysbeen thedominantpromotingpowerforurbanconstruction.

Meanwhile,Qingdao isalsoconfrontedwithmanyproblemsinitsurbanenvironment: a.Conflictsbetweenoriginalresidentsanddevelopersarebeing intensified;spatialdif ferentiation isgrowing. b.Manyhistoricbuildingsaredestroyed;theimageoftheinner cityisfading. c. Some major open spaces lack sufficient accessibility, the ecological environment is beingrapidlyweakened. d.Theexistingroadsystemandpublictrafficshowsanobviousshortageofcapacity.

Theseproblemsshowthattheactualplanningmechanism – i.e. the government for mulating “whattodo” itselfanddeciding“howtodo” withthemarket– islimitedinserving diversifiedinterestsofsocialgroups, supervising cultural and ecological effect of develop ment, reacting to the rapidly changing situation and raising sufficient funds for the city’s publicfacilitiesandinfrastructure.Searchingfornewdevelopmentstrategiesbasedonthe understandingofcivilsocietyintheChinesecontextcanprovideapromisingperspectiveon thestudiesofQingdao’s urbanplanning.

161 Summary

Sincethereformof1978,the“thirdpower” besides the government and the market hasgrownsteadilyinChina,andtheamountofattentionpaidto therelationshipbetween China’surbanplanningandcivilsocietyisincreasing.IntheWest,generallytherearefive majorrepresentativemodelsofacivilsocietyconceptsincethe 18thcentury,namely:the “privateinterest” modelofMarx,the“associatedemocracy” modelofTocqueville,the“cul tural hegemony” modelofGramsci,the“Autonomouscommunication” modelofHabermas, aswellas“Socialinteraction” modelofCohenandArato. In this thesis, the Chinese civil society is defined as the intermediate sphere of individuals, households, citizen’s organi sations,publiccommunications,andofthenongovernmentalbody’snonforprofitinvolve ment fortheprovisionofpublicservicesbetweenthestateandthemarket.Plentyevidences showthatChinahasrichresourceofcivilsocietyinitsownculture.

Theparticipatorystudiesinexistingplanningtheorycanbegenerallydividedintotwo categories:citizeninvolvementindecisionmakingofplanningandpublicprivatepartnership (PPP)withnonforprofiteffortsoftheprivatebodies,whilethelattercanbeclassifiedinto PPPoncommunitylevelandabovecommunitylevel.Generally,the civilsociety’sparticipa tion hasthefollowingadvantages: a.Itisabletoobtaintheknowledgeofthecivilsocietytobetteridentifythetargetsand meansofurbanplanning; b.Itisabletohelpcitizensinfluencetheplanningresultbytheirowninitiativesthus promotingsocialjustice; c.Itisabletoexpandboththecapacitiesandthe motivation of each involved party andofthewhole; d.Itisabletofinanceimprovementsofthescopeandqualityoftheplanningrelated publicservice; e.Itisabletoenhancethelocalidentityandpeople’sresponsibilitytotheurbanenvi ronment;etc.

Therelationshipbetweenthegovernmentalplanningandcivilsociety’sparticipationcan evolve.Many successfulmethodsforcivil participation havebeenintegratedintoplanning lawsandregulationsandbecometheofficialelementsofurbanplanning.

TheChinesegovernmenthasalsostartedtoadvocateforcivilsociety’sparticipationby encouraging the “bottomup” mechanism in planningrelated issues since the 1990’s. For example,someparticipativemeasuresarebecomingstatutorycomponentsinplanningpro

162 Summary

cess;additionally,thegovernmentisinitialisingtheinvolvementoftheprivatebodiesinim provingurbaninfrastructureandotherpublicutilitiesthroughlawsandstatements.

In contemporary China, planning practices incorporating civil participation are also emerging,suchasKaiTak ProjectinHongKong,theResourceRecoveryProjectin Shen yangandtheTaidong ProjectinQingdao. a. In the Kai Tak Project in Hong Kong, public involvement with expert support has formed,principalsandparticularconceptscombiningthecollectivewillofplanningtargets thepeople.Throughcivilparticipation,variousinterestsofthehighlydiversifiedsocietyare betterintegratedintheplanningresult,andplanninghelpspeoplerealise“whattheyneed” and“whattheylike” intheurbanenvironment. b.IntheResourceRecoveryProjectinShenyang,about600inhabitantsintwodistricts arehighlymotivatedbythecommunicationstrategyofAustrian,GermanandChineseex perts intheseparationandutilisationofbioorganicgarbage.Satisfyingscientificandsocial resultshaveseenachieved,andboththeexpertsandthedistrictgovernmentsareencoura ged tofurtherexpandthisproject. c.InthecityofQingdao,thepublicprivatepartnershipbetweenthegovernmentand thevoluntaryartists’ organisationhaseffectively completed the facade renewal project of theTaidong commercialarea,increasedthesocialvitalityandmadeTaidong’s Pedestrian Streetanewtourismhighlightofthecity.

TheexistingplanningpracticeinChinaisabletodemonstratethatcivilsociety’spartici pation helpsimprovethequalityofChineseurbanplanningrealisticallyunderpresentcondi tions,andthatmoderationbyplanningexpertsandthepushoftheauthorityarethetwo keyfactorsforsuccessfullyintegratingthestrengthofcivilsocietyinplanning.

However,thepowerofcivilsocietyisnotyetsufficientlydiscovered.Forbetterplanning results,thecityofQingdao needsmoreinitiatives tomobilizecivilsocietyintheplanning practice, as well as more support to enrich the related studies. This thesis recommends that Qingdao establishes the “Foundation of Collaborative Urban Solutions” through the jointeffortsoftheauthorityand civilinitiatives,whichaims atmoderatingandfacilitating thestrengthofcivilsociety.Thesuggestedpilotprojectsinclude: a.TheCommunitybasedHousingWorkshopforregeneratingthelivingenvironmentof therundowncommunities,wheretheresidentsarewillingtocollaborate withthefounda tion withownefforts.

163 Summary

b.TheHeritagePreservationWorkshopforsuggestinganefficientsupervisionmecha nism involvingcivilsocietywhichprotectsthehistoricheritagefrombeingdestroyedinthe urbanconstruction. c.ThePublicSpaceForumforimprovingaccessibility,quantityandecologicfunctionin thedevelopmentofQingdao’s urbanpublicspacewiththeknowledgeandcreativityofboth thegovernmentandthecitizens. d.TheMassTransitForumforarealisticstrategyforfundingtherailbasedtrafficsys teminQingdao throughenablingthecivilsociety especiallytheindividualcitizensandtheir householdstoinvest.

Throughtheeffortsofthe“FoundationofCollaborativeUrban Solutions”,thegovern ment andthecivilsocietyareabletojointheirdesiresandcapacitiestogethertoimprove urbanspacesandcreatebetterlivesforcitizens.At present, theChinesecity government hasstrongcontroloverurbanconstructionandmanagement,andisalsoabletoeffectively pushtheintegrationofcivilsocietyinplanningpractices.Althoughtheparticularmannerof civilsociety’sinvolvementcanvarystronglyaccordingtorealisticsituations,theefficiencyof theplanningpracticewillstronglydependonthemoderationcapacityofplanningexperts. Thisthesisproposesfurtherstudiesonthetechniquesofplanningmoderationaswellasits educationincollegesinthecontextofcontemporaryChina.Forsuchresearchthepractice of the “Foundation of Collaborative Urban Solutions” in the city of Qingdao will provide valuablereference.

Inthe“City’sera” ofChina,theparticipationofcivilsocietyisareinforcement ofthe currentplanningsystem;itisanrealisticplanninginstrumentwhichstrengthenstheChinese city’scapacitytotacklebroadurbanissues.

164 Zusammenfassung in deutscher Sprache

Die Haupthypothese dieser Arbeit ist, dass durch Beteiligung der Zivilgesellschaft am PlanungsprozessdiePlanungsergebnisseinder chinesischenStadt Qingdao indergegen wärtigen Zeitverbessertwerdenkönnen.

DurchdasschnelleWachstumvomkleinenFischerdorfzumodernenMetropole,sinddie stadtplanerischenErfahrungen in Qingdao stark an die Adaption moderner Planungsideen einerseitsundandiedominierendestädtischePlanungsbehördeandererseitsgeknüpft. Zwi schen 1897und1978wardieStadtentwicklungsplanung Qingdaos durchwegsvoneiner sta rken topdownPlanung geprägt, welche besonders während den Perioden der Deutschen Besatzung(1897bis1914),dererstenJapanischenBesatzung(1914bis1921)undder ers ten Kuomintang Regierung(1929bis1937)mithoherEffizienzverbundenwar.Abgesehen vomEinflussderZentralmachttrugauchdienichtstaatlicheSeite,dazuzählendieBürger bewegungen und die Wirtschaftsverbände, zur räumlichen Entwicklung Qingdaos bei, wie beim Schutz des Tianshou Schreins in den 1910er Jahren,beiderKritikgegen die herr schende Planungssituationinden1930erJahrenoderdenBaudes Zhanshan Tempels zwi schen den1930erund1940erJahren,usw.

Seitder„Reform 1978“ hat Qingdao große Fortschritte beim städtischen Wohnungs wesen, beim Denkmalschutz, beim öffentlichen Raum und städtischen Verkehr gemacht. NichtnurderUmfang,sondernauchdieQualitätdesstädtischenRaumeshatsicherheblich verbessert. Die beachtlichen Leistungen sind das Ergebnis zunehmender gemeinsamer AnstrengungenderRegierungunddesMarktes,wenngleichdiestaatlicheSeiteimmerdie treibendeKraftderstädtebaulichenEntwicklungwar.

InzwischenistdiestädtischeUmwelt Qingdaos auchmitvielerleiProblemenkonfrontiert: a.DieKonfliktezwischendenalteingesessenenBewohnernundden Investorenhaben sichinfolgedermassivenbaulichenAktivitätenimStadtzentrumsowiedenRandbereichen verschärft.RäumlicheSegregationsprozessesindimWachsenbegriffen. b. Viele der historischen Gebäude wurden abgerissen. Die ursprüngliche ästhetische QualitätundsomitdasBildderInnenstadtverschwindetimmermehr. c.EinigebedeutendeöffentlichePlätzeleidenuntereinermangelndenZugänglichkeit; dienatürlicheUmweltgehtzunehmendzurück. d.DasbestehendeStraßennetzundderöffentlicheVerkehrzeigenoffensichtliche Män gel beiderKapazität. Die angesprochenen Probleme zeigen, dass der gegenwärtige Planungsvollzug – bei demdieRegierungselbstvorgibt„waszutunist“ undgemeinsammitdemMarkt entschei

165 Zusammenfassung in deutscher Sprache

det „wiedieszutunist“ – engeGrenzenbesitzt,wennesgilt,aufschnellveränderndeSi tuationen zu reagieren, unterschiedliche soziale Interessen zu bedienen oder ausreichend finanzielleMittelfürdringendestädtischeProblemezurVerfügungzustellen.DieSuchenach neuen Entwicklungsstrategien, die auf einem Verständnis der Zivilgesellschaft im Kontext Chinasbasieren,kanneineaussichtsreichePerspektivefürstadtplanerischeUntersuchungen Qingdaos bieten.

Seitder„Reform1978“ hatdieZivilgesellschaftinChinaanBedeutunggewonnen.Im Westengibtesseitdem18.Jahrhundertfünfrepräsentative ModellederZivilgesellschaft: das Modell des „privaten Interesses“ von Marx, das Modell der „assoziativen Demokra tie“ von Tocqueville,dasModellder„kulturellen Hegonomie“ von Gramsci,dasModellder „autonomenKommunikation“ von Habermas sowiedasModellder„sozialenInteraktion“ von Cohenund Arato.ImeinemVerständnisdessozialenWandelsinChina,definiertsichdie Zi vilgesellschaft aus einem Sphäre von Individuen, Familien, Bürgerorganisationen, sozialen Bewegungen,öffentlichenKommunikationherausundausdennichtstaatlichenInstitutionen des „nonforprofit Involvements“ zur Einrichtung öffentlicher Dienstleistungen zwischen StaatundMarkt.EsgibtausreichendBeweisedafür,dasChinainseinereigenenKulturüber vieleQuelleneinerZivilgesellschaftverfügt.

Die Übernahme von zivilgesellschaftlichen Elementen in die gegenwärtige Planungs theorie kanngrundsätzlichinzweiKategorieneingeteiltwerden:erstensöffentliche Beteili gung imEntscheidungsprozessvonPlanungenundzweitensPrivatePublic Partnerships bei selbstgesteuertenErneuerungsprozessensowiebeiöffentlichenEinrichtungenwobeihierbei PrivatePublic Partnership sowohlauf CommunityEbenewieauchoberhalbder Community Ebeneunterschiedenwerdenkann.SieleistetfolgendezentraleBeiträge: a.SieermöglichtderStadtplanungdasWissenunddieIdeenderZivilgesellschaftzuer halten,umZieleundMeinungenbesseridentifizierenzukönnen. b.SieermöglichtdemBürgerPlanungenmitihreneigenenInitiativenzubeeinflussen undsodiesozialeGerechtigkeitzustärken. c.Sieermöglichtbeides,dieErhöhungderLeistungsfähigkeitunddieStärkungderMo tivation vonjederderinvolviertenParteiensowievonbeidenalseinGanzes. d.SieermöglichtdieErhöhungderfinanziellenMittel,umdenSpielraumunddie Quali tätdermitderPlanungverbundenenServicestellenzuverbessern. e. Sie ermöglicht eine Aufwertung der lokalen Identität und der Verantwortung der MenschengegenüberihremstädtischenUmfeld,usw.

166 Zusammenfassung in deutscher Sprache

DieGrenzezwischenstaatlicherPlanungundzivilgesellschaftlicherBeteiligungistnicht immerunveränderbar.EineVielzahlerfolgreicherFormenvonBürgerbeteiligungsindindie gesetzlichenRegelungenintegriertwordenundwerdensozueinem Teildesoffiziellen städ tischen Planungsregulativs.

Die Chinesische Regierung unterstützt seit 1990 Bürgerbeteiligungen, um bottumup ProzesseinPlanungsbelangenzuermutigen.AufdereinenSeitewerdenAnsätzeder Bür gerbeteiligung zu gesetzlich verpflichtenden Teilen im Planungsprozess; auf der anderen SeiteunterstütztdieRegierungdasEngagementderprivatenSeitebeiderVerbesserungder städtischenInfrastrukturundanderenöffentlichenEinrichtungendurchGesetzeundVerlaut barungen.

ImgegenwärtigenChinanehmenPlanungsprozessemitBürgerbeteiligungalsozu,bei spielsweise dasKai Tak Projektin HongKong oderdas ResourceRecovery Projektin Shen yang. a.ImKai Tak ProjekthabendieBürgermitUnterstützungvonExpertendiePlanungs ziele,dieGrundprinzipienderPlanungundTeilederKonzepteformuliert.DurchdieBürger beteiligung werdendieverschiedenenInteresseneinerinzwischenhochdifferenziertenGe sellschaft besserindasErgebnisderPlanungintegriert;zudemhilftdiePlanungder Bevöl kerung zu erkennen „was sie in ihrer städtischen Umwelt brauchen“ und „was sie dort wollen“. b.Im ResourceRecovery Projektin Shenyang wurdenrund600Bewohnerinzwei Bezir ken durchdieKommunikationsstrategievonÖsterreichischen,DeutschenundChinesischen ExpertenzurTrennungundWiedernutzungvonBiomüllmotiviert.Eswurdensowohlin wi ssenschaftlicher alsauchinsozialerHinsichtbefriedigendeErgebnisseerzieltundbeide,so wohldieExpertenalsauchdieBezirksregierungsindermutigt,dasProjektweiter auszubau en. c.InderStadtQingdaohatein„PublicPrivatePartnership” ausRegierungund“Volun taryArtists’ Organisation” inwirksamerWeiseeinProjektzurErneuerungderFassade?des TadoingGewerbegebietesfertiggestellt,diesozialeVitalitätausgebautundausderFußgän gerzoneinTadoingeinenneuentouristischenGlanzpunktderStadtgemacht.

DievorhandenestadtplanerischePraxisinChinakannaufihreWeisezeigen,dasBür gerbeteiligungdabei hilft, dieQualitätder Stadtplanung unter gegebenen Bedingungen in realistischerWeisezuverbessern.AußerdemsindModerationimPlanungsprozessundder

167 Zusammenfassung in deutscher Sprache

AntriebdurchdieRegierung,zweiwichtigeSchlüsselfaktoren,zurerfolgreichenEinbindung desEinflussesbürgerlicherBeteiligungimPlanungsprozess.

AllerdingswurdedieBedeutungder zivilgesellschaft bishernochnichtausreichendun tersucht.UmbessereErgebnisseimPlanungsprozesszuerzielen,brauchtdieStadt Qingdao mehrInitiativen,diedieGesellschaftimPlanungsprozessmobilisierenundauchmehrUnter stützung dabei,ähnlicheStudienmitErkenntnissenanzureichern.DieseThesebefürwortet, dass Qingdao eine“Foundation of Collaborative Urban Solutions” für gemeinsame Bemü hungen derRegierungundbürgerlicherInitiativeneinrichtensollte,dieaufeinenerleichter tenundangemessenenEinflussderZivilgesellschaftinPlanungen zielt.Dievorgeschlagenen Pilotprojektebeinhalten:

a.Ein“CommunitybasedHousing Workshop” umdasLebensumfeldinden herunterge kommenen Gemeindenzuregenerieren,woortsansässigeWillenssind,durcheigeneAns trengungen mitderStiftungzusammenzuarbeiten. b.Den“HeritagePreservation Workshop” umeineneffizientenSupervisionsprozessun ter EinbeziehungderZivilgesellschaftanzuregen,derdashistorischeErbevorZerstörungim städtischenAufbaubeschützt. c.Ein“Public Space Forum” umZugänglichkeit,Ausmaß undökologischeFunktionbei derEntwicklungdesöffentlichenRaumesin Qingdao zuverbessern,mitdemWissenundder KreativitätsowohlderRegierungalsauchderBürger. d.Das“Mass TransitForum” füreinerealistischeStrategiezurFörderungeines schie nenbasierten Verkehrssystemsin Qingdao,diederGesellschaft,speziellauchdemeinzelnen Bürgerermöglichensollsichzubeteiligen.

Einer“Foundation of Collaborative Urban Solutions” istesmöglich, Qingdaos Planungen zuunterstützenunddiestädtebaulichenSchwierigkeiten denendieStadtinder gegenwär tigen Entwicklunggegenübersteht zubewältigen.Ebensoistsiefähig,wertvolleHinweise für weitergehende Untersuchungen, zu Bürgerbeteiligung in der Stadtplanung Chinas, zu liefern.

DieArtundWeisederMiteinbeziehungderZivilgesellschaftkann inAbhängigkeitvon derlokalenSituationvariieren,fürdiepraktischeUmsetzungbestehtaberfolgendesgemein sames Merkmal:dieRegierungistnichtlängerder„allmächtigeSchöpfer“,sondern erleich tert alseinerderTeilnehmerdieKooperationsprozesse.DieZivilgesellschaftist nichtmehr

168 Zusammenfassung in der deutschen Sprache

reinder„Zuschauer“,sondernagiertdurcheigeneAnstrengungenundBeiträgealsFörderer derStadt.WährenddiePlanernichtmehralsdie„technischeElite“ anzusehensind,sondern alsExperten,diederRegierungundderZivilgesellschaftzurVerfügungstehen.InderPraxis istdasMitwirkenderZivilgesellschaftauchein„lernenderProzess“,währenddemalleTeil nehmer neues Wissen erwerben und ihre Fähigkeiten verbessern. Die Beteiligung der Zivilgesellschaft erreichteineBestärkungdesgegenwärtigenchinesischenPlanungssystems. Zu Zeiten der “City’s Era” in China ist sie ein wichtiges Planungsinstrument um das Vermögen chinesischer Städte auszubauen, die gegenwärtigen städtische Probleme umfassendanzugehen.

169 170 List of Figures

Fig.11~Fig.111:ArchiveofQingdao UrbanPlanningBureau Fig.21:DrawingofZhanErpeng Fig.22~Fig.24:ArchiveofQingdao UrbanPlanningBureau Fig.25:PhotobyLiPeng Fig.26:Photobytheauthor Fig.27~Fig.29:ArchiveofQingdao UrbanPlanningBureau Fig.210:Qingdao NewsAgency Fig.211,Fig.212:ArchiveofQingdao UrbanPlanningBureau Fig.31,Fig.32:PhotobyDieterHassenpflug Fig.33,Fig.34:Photobytheauthor Fig.35:PhotobyDieterHassenpflug Fig.36~Fig.39:Photobytheauthor Fig.310:ArchiveofQingdao UrbanPlanningBureau Fig.41:Drawingbytheauthor Fig.42:PhotobyChineseSocialScienceInstitute. Fig.43:PhotobySunCorporation. Fig.44:Historicalpainting Fig.45,Fig.46:Photocollectionoftheauthor Fig.47:Xiamen CityNews Fig.48,Fig.49:Chuzhou DailyAgency Fig.410:LisaVeneKlasenandValerieMiller,2002,pp.104 Fig.411:Arnstein,S.,1969,pp.218 Fig.412:Innes,J.E.andBooher,D.E.,2000,pp.131 Fig.413:Drawingbytheauthor Fig.414:DrawingbyDieterHassenpflug Fig.415:Xinhua NewsAgency Fig.51:HEC,2004 Fig.52:Raninger,B.,2006

Tab.1:Huang,J.,2002 Tab.2:DrawingbytheauthorbasedonQingdao SocialSience Institute,2003 Tab.3:Raninger,B.,2006

171 172 Notes

[1]~[3]SeeQingdao HistoricalRecordOffice, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofHistoric Record .http://202.110.193.6/shizhi.nsf

[4]SeeQingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics,2000~2005 .http:// www.statsqd.gov.cn

[5]In1888theGermanEmperorWilhelmIIcameintopowerandGermanystartedtocom pete withtheoldimperialistpowersworldwide.Basedontheinvestigationsofgeographer Ferdinand von Richthofen, naval commander Alfred von Tirpitz, harbour engineer Geoge Franzius,etc.,GermanyhaddecidedtoseizeJiaozhou BayinJune,1897.On01November 1897,twoGermanmissionariesweremurderedinJüye CountyofShandongProvince,China, andthatprovidedanexcusethatWilhelmIIwaswaiting for. Also see Hinz, H.M. (ed.), 1998.

[6]AmongtheformerconcessionsestablishedfromtheendoftheFirstSino–JapaneseWar in1895totheestablishmentofP.R.Chinain1949,Qingdao andDalian arethetwocities whoseurbandevelopmentaremoststronglyinfluencedbythecolonialplanningandcon struction.AlsoseeYang,B.D.,1982.

[7]~[11]SeeQingdao HistoricalRecordOffice, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofHistoric Record, http://202.110.193.6/shizhi.nsf

[12]AlsoseeLi,D.Q.,2003,pp.635

[13]SeeMaercker,G.,1902,pp.23

[14]SeealsoWarner,T.,1994,pp.14

[15]SeealsoLiu,C.,2004,pp.140

[16]DuringtheGermanoccupationinQingdao,theinfluentialmerchant’sassociationswere theLianghu Association,Qiyan Association,Sanjiang AssociationandGuangdongAssocia tion.Theyhadalsobuilttheirassemblyhalls,thoseofLianghu andQiyan Associationhas beenwellkeptuntiltoday.AlsoseeXu,F.P.(ed.),2004,pp.255256

[17]~[19]SeeQingdao HistoricalRecordOffice, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofHistoric Record .http://202.110.193.6/shizhi.nsf

[20]SeealsoLiD.Q.andXu F.P.,2003,pp.3744

[21]SeeXu,F.P.(ed.),2005,pp.43

[22]“InanattempttobreakwiththeRussianmodelofCommunismandtocatchupwith moreadvancednations,MaoproposedthatChinashouldmakea‘greatleapforward’ into modernisation… Labourintensive methods were introduced and farming collectivised on a massive scale. The campaign created about 23,500 communes, each controlling its own

173 Notes

meansofproduction.Butformerfarmershadnoideahowtoactuallyusethenewfactories andwhatwasoncefertilecroplandwenttowasteonadisastrousscale.TheGreatLeap Forwardwasheldresponsibleforfaminein1960and1961.” InBBC,http://news.bbc.co.uk /hi/english/static/special_report/1999/09/99/china_50/great.htm

[23]TheThreeYearsofNaturalDisastersreferstotheperiodinthePeople'sRepublicof Chinabetween1959and1961,inwhichacombinationofpooreconomicpoliciesandrounds ofnaturaldisasterscausedwidespreadfaminealloverthenation.

[24]TheBeihai DockyardwasmovedtothewestbankoftheJiaozhou Bayin2004forthe constructionof2008’sOlympicRegattaprojectsinitssite.

[25]~[27]SeeQingdao HistoricalRecordOffice, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofHisto ric Record. http://202.110.193.6/shizhi.nsf

[28]In1984thecitybegantoexploitHuangdao District,whichissitedinthewesternbank oftheJiaozhou Bay,asa“EconomicandTechnicalDevelopmentZone”.Thisstrategypro vided muchindustriallandforthegrowinginvestment,andbegantochangethe“belt” pa ttern ofthecity.ThelineardistancebetweenHuangdao andtheolddowntownisonly2.6 seamiles(4.5kilometres),butactuallythetrafficcouldonlyrelyontheferrythatwaslarge ly affectedbytheweather,andthe120KilometerhighwayalongJiaozhou Bay,asthecostly flyoverbridgewasonlyinblueprint.DuetoinconvenienttrafficconditionHuangdao District developed mainly as a monofunctional industrial area and could not exist as an organic componentofthecity.AlsoseeLiD.Q.andXu F.P.,2003,pp.39

[29] See Duan D., 2002. http://aoyun.qingdaonews.com/gb/content/200207/01/content_ 750925.htm

[30]Qingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankof Statistics. www.statsqd.gov.cn /fxzl/contents/ndgb/tjgbcx.asp?nf=2003

[31] Qingdao Statistic Bureau, Qingdao Public Online Databank of Statistics 20002005. www.statsqd.gov.cn/fxzl/contents/ndgb/tjgbcx.asp?nf=2004

[32]Qingdao UrbanPlanningBureau,1999,pp.43

[33],[34]Ibid.,pp.6669

[35]~[40]Qingdao StatisticBureau, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics2000 2005 .http://www.statsqd.gov.cn

[41]AlsoseeHassenflug,D.,2000

[42]SeeQingdao HistoricalRecordOffice, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofHistoricRe cord .http://202.110.193.6/shizhi.nsf

174 Notes

[43]Qingdao StatisticBureau, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics20002005 http://www.statsqd.gov.cn

[44]SeePeople’sDaily,2002.5.7. [45]~[47]ChineseEconomicWeekly,2004.1.2

[43]Qingdao StatisticBureau, Qingdao PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics20002005 . http://www.statsqd.gov.cn

[44]People’sDaily,Qingdao guojian bianjie chengshi gongjiao wang (Qingdao BuildingCon venient PublicTraffic).2002.5.7.

[45]~[47]ChineseEconomicWeekly,2004.1.2

[48]SeeZhu,L.Y.,2003

[49]SeeXinhua Agency,2005.11.1

[50]SeeQingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics,2000~2005 . http://www.statsqd.gov.cn

[51]SeeInternetForumofQingdao CityAchieve.http://club.qingdaonews.com

[52]SeeQingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics,2000~2005 . http://www.statsqd.gov.cn

[53]SeealsoHassenpflug,D.,2004,pp.36

[54]SeealsoLi,D.Q.,2003

[55]OwncalculationbasedonQingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankofStatis tics,2000~2005 .http://www.statsqd.gov.cn

[56]OwncalculationbasedonQingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankofStatis tics,2000~2005 andXinhua Agency,2006.1.2.

[57]Qingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics,2000~2005 .

[58]SeeQingdao News.2006.2.10. http://www.shm.com.cn/newscenter/200602/28/content_1368116.htm

[59]SeeStateCouncilofP.R.C.,2001

[60]SeeHongKongMTRCo.,OnlineInformation. http://www.mtr.com.hk/chi/Investrelation/financialinfo_c.php#02

175 Notes

[61]Seehttp://philosophy.cass.cn/suozhi/huiyilu/08.htm

[62]NationalBureauofStatisticsofChina, OfficialJournalsofDomesticEconomicandSocial DevelopmentofChina1990~2005 .http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjl

[63]InChina,thecitizen’sassociations,regardlessitsindependencytothestateinstitutions, areofficiallycalled“socialorganisations”.Therearefourcategoriesfortheregisteredsocial organisations,namelytheacademy,trade,professionandunitedorganisation.

[64]SeeChinese NationalInternetInformationCentre, 2004.

[65]SeeChineseSocialScienceInstitute,2001.

[66],[67]SeeNationalBureauofStatisticsofChina,2004.

[68]ChineseNationalInternetInformationCentre,2004.

[69]Seewww.cctv.com/news/china/20060308/100001.shtml

[70]Seehttp://www.dwworld.de/dw/article/0,2144,2168678,00.html

[71]SeealsoXu,J.L.,2004

[72]FormoreinformationonChenJ.G.seewww.fjql.org/qszl/xsyj45.htm

[73]Seewww.cctv.com/news/china/20060308/100001.shtml

[74]SeeCharterofMachu Picchu,1977

[75]Seealso Taylor,N.,1998.

[76]Forexample,PlanningCommissionofIndiadefinesPPPas“amodeofimplementing governmentprogrammes/schemesinpartnershipwiththeprivatesector… PPP,moreover, subsumesalltheobjectivesoftheservicebeingprovidedearlierbythegovernment,andis not intended to compromise on them” (www.planningcommission.nic.in/reports). Public PrivatePartnershipCouncilofCanadadefinesPPPas“cooperateventurebetweenthepublic andprivatesectors,builtiontheexperienceofeachpartner,thatbestmeetsclearlydefined public needs through the appropriate allocation of resource, risks and rewards“ (www. pppcouncil.ca/pdf/awards05.pdf)ForDevelopmentProgrammeofUN, “PPPs includeinformal dialogues between government officials and local communitybased organisations, to longterm concession arrangements with private business, but not privatisation“ (www3.undp.org/pppue/prog.html). See also Akintoye, A., Beck, M., and Hardcastle, C., 2003

[77]Formoreinformationseehttp://www.mcgill.ca/mchg/

176 Notes

[78],[79]FormoreinformationonOPPinKarachi,seealsohttp://casestudies.lead.org/ index.php?cscid=142

[80]SeealsoColin,S.,1998

[81]SeealsoAkintoye,A.,Beck,M.,andHardcastle,C.,2003

[82]FormoreinformationontheToledodevelopmentseewww.lisc.org/toledo/partners/ cdcs_7300/revitalization_7258.shtml

[83]For“theLawonUrbanPlanningofP.R.China” seewww.cin.gov.cn/law/main/law023. htm

[84]For“TheMethodsofShandongProvinceImplementingtheLawonUrbanPlanningofP. R.China”,seewww.zbcg.gov.cn/Article/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=30

[85]Forthecontentofthespeechseehttp://www.cin.gov.cn/city/speech/2000091201.htm

[86]For“CompilingMethodsforUrbanPlanning” see http://www.chinajsb.cn/gb/content/200603/14/content_166386.htm

[87]For“ImplementationProgramforPromotingLegalAdministration” see www.china.org.cn/chinese/PIc/549128.htm

[88]Forthecontentofthespeechseewww.politics.people.com.cn/GB/1027/3975474.html

[89]Forthecontentofthedeclarationseehttp://www.harbour.sfu.ca/dlam/summary%20 record%2005.htm

[90]For“DecisionsonScientificDevelopmentofEnhancingEnvironmentalProtection” see http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/news/1122847.htm

[91]Forthe“TemporaryMeasuresforEvaluatingPublicInvolvementInfluencedbythe Environment” seehttp://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/200602/22/content_4213064.htm

[92]Forthecontentofthespeechseewww.cin.gov.cn/INDUS/speech/2002011001.htm

[93]For“ConcessionaryAdministrationMeasuresofMunicipalPublicProjects” see http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/PIc/531821.htm

[94]For“DecisionsonANumbersofIssuesaboutImprovingtheSocialistMarketEconomic System” seewww.news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/200310/21/content_1135402.htm

[95]Forthecontentofthespeechseewww.cin.gov.cn/indus/speech/2004051002.htm

177 Notes

[96]For“SupportingandGuidingtheDevelopmentofNonpublicEconomy”,seewww.china. org.cn/chinese/PIc/795128.htm

[97]For“ObservationsonStrengtheningandImprovingCommunityService2006”,see www.gov.cn/zwgk/200604/21/content_259996.htm

[98]For“The11thFiveYearPlanofNationalEconomicandSocialDevelopment” see www.china.org.cn/chinese/2006/Mar/1156685.htm

[99]“Grau,teurerFreund,istalleTheorieundgründesLebensgoldnerBaum.” JohannW. Goethe,FaustI

178 Bibiliography

1. Literature on Qingdao

Bauer,W., Tsingtau 1914bis1931:japanischeHerrschaft,wirtschaftlicheEntwicklungund dieRückkehrderdeutschenKaufleute .München: Iudicium,2000

Behme,F., Führerdurch Tsingtau undUmgebung . Wolfenbüttel: Heckner,1906

Biener,AnnetteS., DasdeutschePachtgebiet Tsingtau in Schantung,1897 1914: institutionellerWandeldurchKolonialisierung .Bonn: Matzat,2001

Denkschrift, DieErgebnissedermeteorologischenBeobachtungenin Tsingtau .Berlin,1899 1909

Dong,J.H., Zhongguo chengshi jianshe zhi (TheHistoryofUrbanConstructioninChina) . Beijing,ConstructionExpress,1986

Maercker,G., DieEntwicklungdesKiautschougebietes .Berlin:DeutscheKolonialges.,1902 1903

Gu,Y.R.,Xu,X.M., Gonggongyishuzaijiuchenggaizaoahongdeyingyong(Application of PublicArtinUrbanRegeneration). ArchitecturalJournal2004:9,pp.3133

LiD.Q.andXu F.P., Qingdao lishi shang desanci feiyue.(TheThreeBoomsintheUrban DevelopmentHistoryofQingdao), UrbanPlanReview2003;1,pp.3744

Liu,C., TheCharacterofUrbanDesigninModernQingdao .InChristW.&HassenpflugD. (ed.),JahrbuchderModellprojekte2002,Weimar:BUW,2003

Liu,C., VonderFriedrichstrassezumPlatzdes4.Mai– ÖffentlicherRauminQingdao .In HassenpflugD.(ed.),DieaufgeschlosseneStadt– ÖffentlicherRauminChina.Weimar:VDG &Shanghai:Tongji,2004

Liu,S.Z.(ed.), ÜbersetzungenderBeiträgezurGeschichtederchinesischdeutschen Beziehungen ,Qingdao:QingdaoPress,1992

Mohr,F.W., HandbuchfürdasSchutzgebietKiautschou .Tsingtau:Schmidt,1911

Maercker,G., DieEntwicklungdesKiautchougebietes.ErsterundzweiterTeil. Berlin: DeutscheKolonialzeitung,1902&1903

Matzat,W., DerZusammenhangderBodenpolitikvonTsingtauundTaiwan .InZeitschriftfür Sozialökonomie,September1992,pp.2934

Hinz,H.M.(ed.), Tsingtau EinKapiteldeutscherKolonialgeschichteinChina1897– 1914 . München:Peschke,1998

Hirst,P., AssociativeDemocracyNewFormsofEconomicandSocialGovernance,Amherst: Univ. ofMassachusettsPress,1994.

Hu,J.H., Qingdao bihua buxing jie:zhongguo chengshi gonggong yishu dexin anli (Qing dao MuralStreet– ANewCaseofPublicArtinChina). BeijingEntertainmentNews,2004.8.1

179 Bibiliography

People’sDaily, Qingdao guojian bianjie chengshi gongjiao wang (Qingdao Building Convinient PublicTraffic). 2002.5.7.

Qingdao Archive, AtlasofQingdao .Jinan:ShandongAtlasPublishingHouse,2002

Qingdao HistoricalRecordOffice, PublicOnlineDatabankofHistoricRecord ,http://202.110. 193.6/shizhi.nsf/jiuqingdao?OpenView

Qingdao StatisticBureau, PublicOnlineDatabankofStatistics20002005 .http://www.stats qd.gov.cn

Qingdao UrbanPlanningBureau, UrbanOverallPlanofQingdao .Qingdao:Qingdao Press, 1999

SchmidtGlintzer,H., DasneueChina:vondenOpiumkriegenbisheute . Munich:Beck,1999

ShandongTradeUnion, Qingdao canan shiliao (TheHistoricDataofQingdao Massacre). Beijing:WorkerPress,1985

Spence,JonathanD.,Chin,A.P.andDubilski,P.,DasJahrhundertChinas ,München:Ber telsmann,1996

StaigerB.,(ed.), LaenderberichtChina:Geschichte,Politik,Wirtschaft,Gesellschaft,Kultur . Darmstadt:Wiss.Buchges.,2000

Song,F.J.andWeng,X.L., ThecharacterofQingdao’s modernarchitecturalhistory ,Paper ofChineseArchitecturalHistoryStudies,Beijing:ConstructionPress,1992

Warner,T .,DeutscheArchitekturinChina– Architekturtransfer ,Berlin:Ernst&Sohn,1994

Warner,T., DiePlanungundEntwicklungderdeutschenStadtgründungQingdao(Tsingtau) inChina:derUmgangmitdemFremden .TUHamburgHarburg,Dissertation,,1996

Wilhelm,R., ReligionundPhilosophieChinas .Jena:Diederichs,1910

Wilhelm,R., DieSeeleChinas .Berlin:Hobbing,1926

Wilhelm,R., Ostasien:WerdenundWandeldeschinesischenKulturkreises .Potsdam:Müller &Kiepenheuer,1928

Xu,F.P.(ed.), TheHistoricalArchitectureinQingdao .Qingdao:Qingdao Press,2005

Xue,B.X.andLiu,C., GlobalisationandthePublicSpaceinChina ,InChineseArchitectural Society(ed.),YearbookoftheChineseArchitecturalSociety2005,Beijing:Construction Press,2006

Yuan,R.S., Jiaoao zhi (TheHistoryofJiao’ao). Qingdao:QingdaoAdministrationBureau, 1928

Zhan,E.P, Entstehung,WandlungundSanierungder"Hüttenviertel"inQingdao(Tsingtau): SiedlungsbauundVeränderungenderStadtstrukturalssozialesProbleminden KüstenstädtenderVRChina .Berlin:LogosVerl.,2002.

180 Bibiliography

2. Literature on planning-related theory and practice

Alexander,C., TheOregan Experiment .NewYork:OxfordUniv.Press,1975

Apel,H., Dernbach,D., Ködelpeter,T.,Weinbrenner,Peter(ed.) : WegezurZukunftsfähig keit – einMethodenhandbuch,StiftungMitarbeit.Bonn,1998

Akintoye,A.,Beck,M.andHardcastle,C., PublicprivatePartnerships ManagingRisksand Opportunities .Malden,MA:BlackwellScience,2003

Aristotle, ThePolitics .NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress,1965

Arnstein,S.R., Aladderofcitizenparticipation .JournaloftheAmericanInstitutionofPlan ners (JAIP),Vol.35(4),pp.351,1969

Atteslander,P., MethodenderempirischenSozialforschung .Berlin,NewYork:Walterde Gruyter,1991

Becker,H., Stadtbaukultur– Modelle,Workshops,Wettbewerbe.VerfahrenderVerständi gungüberdieGestaltungderStadt .SchriftendesDeutschenInstitutsfürUrbanistik,Band 88,in2Teilbänden,Stuttgart,2002

Bennett,R.J.andKrebs,G., LocalEconomicDevelopmentPublicprivatePartnershipInitia tives inBritainandGermany .London:BelhavenPress,1991

Benevolo,L.,TheHistoryoftheCity.Cambridge:MITPress,1980

Bonas,I.andSchwarz,C., PlanningforRealinderPraxis– DokumentationundAuswertung einerbegleitendenBeratungdesStadtteilprojektesNOWAinPotsdamBabelsberg, VeröffentlichungsreihedesIFP/IFGLokaleÖkonomie,Nr.25,Berlin,1996

Bischoff,A.,Selle,K.andSinning,H., Informieren,Beteiligen,Kooperieren.Kommunikation inPlanungsprozessen. Dortmund,1995

Black,A., CivilSociety .InMillerD.(ed.), TheBlackwellEncyclopaediaofPoliticalThought . Oxford:Blackwell,1987

Bourdieu,P., Distinction:aSocialCritiqueoftheJudgmentofTaste .London:Routledge and Kegan Paul,1984

Buchanan,J.M.andTullock,G., TheCalculusofConsent:LogicalFoundationsofConstitu tional Democracy .AnnArbor:UniversityofMichiganPress,1962

Christ,W.andHassenpflug,D.(ed.), JahrbuchderModellprojekte2002 .Weimar:BUW,2002

ChineseSocialScienceInstitute, Guanyu Habermas jiaoshou laihua xueshu fangwen (About TheAcademical VisitofProf.Habermas inChina). 2001.http://philosophy.cass.cn/suozhi/ huiyilu/08.htm

Claussen,B.,Fürst,D.,Selle,K.andSinning,H. ,ZukunftsaufgabeModeration. Frankfurt/Main,1996

Cohen,J.andAratoA., CivilSocietyandPoliticalTheory .Cambridge,MA:MITPress,1994

181 Bibiliography

CohenJ., Deliberation and DemocraticLegitimacy ,InHamlinA.andPettitP.(eds.),The GoodPolicy.Oxford:Blackwell,1989,pp.1734

Colin,S.,IntheTwilightZone,ASurveyofPublicprivatePartnershipinSweden.InSweden. PublicProductivityandManagementReview,1998;21(3),pp.272283

Davis,P., PublicPrivatePartnerships:ImprovingUrbanLife .NewYork,AcademyofPolitical Science,1986

DavidoffP.andReiner T., AChoiceTheoryofPlanning .JAIP.Vol.28,1962,pp.103131

Davidoff,P., AdvocacyandPluralisminplanning .JAIP,Vol.31,1965,pp.331338

Deng,Z.L.(ed.), StateandtheCivilSociety. Beijing:SocialSciencePress,2002

DeutschesKinderhilfswerkundAktion"SchleswigHolstein":PlanenmitPhantasie.Zukunfts werkstattundPlanungszirkelfürKinderundJugendliche.Berlin/Kiel,1996

Douglass,M.andFriedmann,J.(ed.), CitiesforCitizens:PlanningandtheRiseofCivil SocietyinaGlobalAge. Chichester:JohnWiley&Sons,1998

Dryzek,J.S., PoliticalInclusionandtheDynamicsofDemocratization. TheAmericanPolitical ScienceReview,90(3),1986,pp.475–487

Elster,J.(ed.), DeliberativeDemocracy .NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress,1998

EuropeanandEconomicandSocialCommittee(EESC),TheCivilSocietyOrganizedatthe EuropeanLevel ,Brussels:EESC,October1999.Innes,J.E., InformationinCommunicative Planning .JAPA,Vol.64(1),1998,pp.52–63

Fan,W.B., ShanghaiLinong Baohu YuGengxin (TheProtectionandRenegeration ofthe Linong HousinginShanghai) .Shanghai:Science Press,2001

Fang,K., Dangdai BeijingJiucheng Gengxin (ContemporaryRedevelopmentintheInnerCity of Beijing ).Beijing:ConstructionPress,2003

Faßbinder,H., StadtforumBerlin.EinübunginkooperativePlanung,HarburgerBerichtezur Stadtplanung8, Hamburg,1997,www.stadtforumberlin.de

Fagence,M.,C itizenParticipationinPlanning ,Oxford:Pergamon Press,1977

Fainstein,S.S., PlanninginaDifferentVoiceRIPT ,1992,pp.456460

Fenster,T., PlanningasControl:CulturalandGenderedManipulationandMisuseofKnow ledge , Hagar InternationalSocialScienceReview ,3(1),2002,pp.67–84

Feiner J.,Mi,S.WandSchmidt,WillyA., Meetingthechallengeoffutureurbanization– Risk andopportunitiesforfutureurbanplanninginP.R.China .DISP145,2001,pp.10

Florida,R., TheRiseoftheCreativeClass:andHowit’sTransformingWork,Leisure,Com munity andEverydayLife. NewYork:Perseus Books,2002

Forester,J., PlanningIntheFaceofPower ,Berkeley,CA,UniversityofCaliforniaPress,1989

182 Bibiliography

Forester,J., TheDeliberativePractitioner:EncouragingParticipatoryPlanningProcesses , Cambridge,MA:MITPress,1999

Friedmann,J., TheGoodSociety:APersonalAccountofItsStrugglewiththeWormofSocial PlanningandaDialecticalInquiryintotheRootsofRadicalPractice .Cambridge:MIT,1979

Friedmann,J., PlanninginthePublicDomain:FromKnowledgetoAction .NewJersey: PrincetonUniversityPress,1987

Friedmann,J., TheNewPoliticalEconomyofPlanning:TheRiseofCivilSociety .InDouglass, M.andFriedmann,J.(eds .),CitiesforCitizens:PlanningandtheRiseofCivilSocietyina GlobalAge .ChichesterandNewYork:JohnWileyandSons,1999

Friedmann,J. China’sUrbanTransition. Minneapolis,Univ.ofMinnesotaPress,2005

Fuchs,G.,Hehn,M., Umweltmediation .EditedbyFördervereinUmweltmediatione.V.Bonn, 1999

Garnham,H.L., MaintainingtheSpiritofPlace:AProcessforthePreservationofTown Character .Mesa,Arizona:PDAPublishers,1985

GermanCommissionforUNESCO, ProtectionandCulturalAnimationofMonuments,Sites andHistoricTownsinEurope .Dyroff,HansDieter.– Bonn,1980

Giddens,A., The ThirdWay:TheRenewalofSocialDemocracy. Cambridge;PolityPress,1998

Gramsci,A., SelectionsfromthePrisonNotebooks .EditedandtranslatedbyHoare,Q.and Smith,G.N..New York:InternationalPublishers,1971

Hall,P., CitiesofTomorrow:AnIntellectualHistoryofUrbanPlanningandDesigninthe TwentiethCentury .Oxford:Blackwell,2002

He,Q.L., Xiandaihua dexianjing (TheTrapofModernity). Beijing:TodayChina,1997

He,Q.L.,Zhongguo shehui zhuanxing dezongti Fenxi (AGeneralAnalysisofChina’sSocial Transformation). http://www.xiping.net/xiping/article.php/237

HEC(2004),KaiTak PlanningReview.www.pland.gov.hk/p_study/

Habermas,J., TheTheoryofCommunicativeAction .Boston:Beacon,1984

Habermas,J. TheStructuralTransformationofthePublicSphere:anInquiryintoaCategory ofBourgeoisSociety .Cambridge:PolityPress,1989

Habermas,J. BetweenFactsandNorms:ContributionstoaDiscourse. Cambridge:MITPress, 1996

Harvey,D., TheUrbanizationofCapital:StudiesintheHistoryandTheoryofCapitalist Urbanization .Oxford:BasilBlackwell,1985

Harvey,D., TheConditionofPostmodernity:AnEnquiryintotheOriginsofCulturalChange . Cambridge:Blackwell,1990

183 Bibiliography

Harvey,D .Thenewurbanismandthecommunitariantrap .HarvardDesignMagazine, Winter/Spring1997

Harvey,D., Justice,Nature,andtheGeographyofDifference .Oxford:Blackwell,1996

Hassenpflug,D., Citytainment oderdieZukunftdesöffentlichenRaums. InMatejovski D. (ed.), Metropolen,Laboratorien der Moderne. NewYork:CampusVerlag,2000

Hassenpflug,D., TheRiseofPublicUrbanSpaceinChina ,paperfortheConference“City Future”,Chicago,2004.Inhttp://www.uic.edu/cuppa/cityfutures

Hassenpflug,D., TheEmergingNewParadigmofUrbanPlanning .Urban PlanningOverseas, 2004;6,pp.2330,Shanghai

Hassenpflug,D.(ed.), DieaufgeschlosseneStadt .Weimar:VDG&Shanghai:Tongji,2005

Hassenpflug,D., AboutPostIndustrialRestructuringinGermany– IBA“Emscher Park” and theNewParadigmofRegionalPlanning .ArchitecturalJournal2005;12,Beijing,pp.69

Hassenpflug,D., ReflexiveUrbanistik .Weimar:BUW,2006

Healey,P., PlanningThroughDebate:TheCommunicativeTurninPlanningTheory .In FischerF.andForesterJ.(ed.),TheArgumentativeTurninPolicyAnalysisandPlanning, London:UCLPress,1993,pp.233253

Healey,P.,TheCommunicativeTurninPlanningTheoryanditsImplicationsforSpatial StrategyFormation,RIPT,1996,pp.23755.

Healey,P., CollaborativePlanning:MakingFrameworksinFragmentedSocieties.London: Macmillan,1997

Hearn,J., Foreignaid,democratisation,andcivilsocietyinAfrica:AstudyofSouthAfrica , Ghana,andUganda.IDSDiscussionPaper368,1999,pp.128

Huber,A.,Schlosser,I., DokumentationeineraktivierendenBefragunginderWohnanlage anderOttobrunnerStraße,München,1999

Innes,J., PlanningTheory'sEmergingParadigm:CommunicativeActionandInteractive Practice .JournalofPlanningEducationandResearch1995;14(3),pp.1839

Innes,J.E., PlanningThroughConsensusBuilding:aNewViewoftheComprehensive PlanningIdeal .JAPA,Vol.62(4),1996,pp.460–72

Joss,S., DieKonsensuskonferenzinTheorieundAnwendung. AkademiefürTechnikfolgen abschätzunginBadenWürttemberg,Stuttgart,2000

Jungk,R.,Müllert,NorbertR., Zukunftswerkstätten– MitPhantasiegegenRoutineund Resignation, München,1989

Ködelpeter,T., MitZukunftswerkstättenAgenda21Prozesseinitiieren .In:Apel,H., Dernbach,D.,Ködelpeter,T.,Weinbrenner,P.(ed.):WegezurZukunftsfähigkeit– ein Methodenhandbuch,StiftungMitarbeit.Bonn,1998,pp.66–82

184 Bibiliography

Kuhnt,B.and Müllert,NorbertR., ModerationsfibelZukunftswerkstätten .Münster,1996 Lennartz,A.,and Mussel,C., BeteiligungderÖffentlichkeitbeiderStandortauswahlfürdie EndlagerungradioaktiverAbfälle ,Hannover,2002,www.akend.de

Liu,C., OnCivicorientedDevelopmentofChina’sUrbanSpace ,paperpresentedinconferen ce “HarvardProjectforAsiaandInternationalRelations”,Tokyo,2005

Li,Q., Jingji fenceng yu zhengzhi fengceng (EconomicClassificationandPoliticalClassifi cation).Shehuixue Yanjiu (SociologyStudies) ,Beijing,1997(4)

LiuZ.F., SpeechonNationalConferenceonResettlementIssues ,2002. www.cin.gov.cn/INDUS/speech/2002091601.htm

Logan,J.R.,Bian,Y.J.,andBian,F.Q. HousinginequalityinurbanChinainthe1990's . InternationalofUrbanandRegionalResearch1999,Vol.23,pp.725

Lue J.H.;Rowe,PeterG.andZhangJ., ModernurbanhousinginChina:1840– 2000 , Munich:Prestel,2001

Lynch,K., GoodCityForm ,Cambridge:MITPress,1984

Lynch,K., DasBildderStadt. Braunschweig:Vieweg,1996

Mansbridge,J., OnDerivingTheoryfromPractice .InFung A.andWrightE.O.(ed.), DeepeningDemocracy:InstitutionalInnovationsinEmpoweredParticipatoryGovernance . LondonandNewYork:Verso,2002

Marcuse,P., ThePartitionedCityinHistory .InMarcuse P.andVanKempe R.(ed.),Of StatesandCities:ThePartitioningofUrbanSpace.NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress, 2002,pp.1134

Mancur Olson, TheLogicofCollectiveAction:PublicGoodsandtheTheoryofGroup s.Cam bridge:HarvardUniversityPress,1964

Marx,K.,andEngels,F., TheGermanIdeology .(orig.edn.1846),NewYork:International Publishers,1947

McCarthy,T., TheCriticalTheoryofJürgen Habermas ,MITPress,1978

McConnell,G., PrivatePowerandAmericanDemocracy .NewYork:AlfredA.Knopf,1966

Molotch,H., TheCityasaGrowthMachine:TowardaPoliticalEconomyofPlace.American JournalofSociology1976,Vol.82,pp.30930

Mediationsgruppe,FlughafenFrankfurt/Main(ed.): BerichtMediationFlughafen Frankfurt/Main ,Frankfurt,2000

Mumford,L., TheCityinHistory:ItsOrigin,ItsTransformations,andItsProspects .New York:HarcourtBraceJovanovich,1961

Newman,PandKenworthy,J., Cities andAutomobileDependence:AnInternationalSource book. London:Gower,1999

185 Bibiliography

NHS, PublicPrivatePartnershipinNationalHealthScience,BOTandBOOTFinancialService: GoodPractice .London:HMSO,1999

Niu,M.S.(2003), TheInformalAutonomyandSuccourinChina(Huannan xiangzhu – lu zhongguo minjian dezizhi hefupin).http://www.bbtpress.com/homepagebook

NorbergSchulz,C., Existence,Space&Architecture .London:StudioVista,1971

NationalBureauofStatisticsofChina, OfficialJournalsofDomesticEconomicandSocial DevelopmentofChina1990~2005 .http://www.stats.gov.cn/tj

Pohl,K.H., YuZhongguo Zuo Kuawenhua duihua (InterculturalDialogwithChina) .Trans lated byLiuH.R.andZhangG.G.,Beijing:Zhonghua Shuju,2003

Portugali,J., SelfOrganizationandtheCity .Berlin:Springer,1999

PutnamRobertD., MakingDemocracyWork .Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,1993

Putnam,RobertD .,BowlingAlone:America'sDecliningSocialCapital. JournalofDemocracy, January1995

Raninger B.,Bidlingmaier,W.andLi,R.D. PilotActivitiesonSourceSeparationofBioorganic MunicipalWaste(BMW)inChina ,paperpresentedatInt.PollutionControlConference, ShanghaiTongji Univ.,2005

Raninger,B., ResourceRecoveryandUtilisationofBioorganicMunicipalWaste .PaperDraft fortheORBITConferenceatBUWeimar,September2006

Raninger,B., AdvancedCompostTechnologyforBeijing .PaperpresentedatInternational ConferenceandExhibitiononMunicipalSolidWasteICMSMW,Beijing,1995

RawlsJ., PoliticalLiberalism .NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress,1993

Reinert,A., MobilisierungderKompetenzvonLaien .In:Apel,H.,Dernbach,D.,Ködelpeter, T.,Weinbrenner,P.(ed.):WegezurZukunftsfähigkeit– einMethodenhandbuch,Stiftung Mitarbeit,Bonn,1998,pp.3848

Rifkin,J., TheAgeofAccess ,NewYork:Campus,2000

Rowe,PeterG., CivicRealism .Cambridge:MITPress,1997

Sager,T., CommunicativePlanningTheory .Vermont:Ashgate PublishingCompany,1994

Sandercock,L., TowardsCosmopolis:PlanningforMulticulturalCities. Chichester:Wiley& Sons,1998

Sassen,S., TheGlobalCity .Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress,2001

Selle,K.(ed.),PlanungundKommunikation,Wiesbaden/Berlin,1996

Sellnow,R., Erstedeutsche"KonsensusKonferenz"zumThema:"StreitfallGendiagnostik" . In:StiftungMitarbeit(ed.),RundbriefBürgerbeteiligungI/2002,Bonn,pp.10–18

186 Bibiliography

Schmitter,P., TheIronyofModernDemocracyandtheViabilityofEffortstoReformits Practice .InWrightE.O.(ed.), AssociationsandDemocracy .LondonandNewYork:Verso, pp.16783,1995

Sen,Amartya K., DevelopmentasFreedom .NewYork:Knopf,2001

Sen,Amartya K., CommoditiesandCapacities .NewDehli:Oxfort Univ.Press,2004

Sieverts,T.(ed.), IBA Emscher Park,ZukunftswerkstattfürIndustrieregionen .Köln:Müller 1991

SitteC., DerStädtebaunachseinenkünstlerischenGrundsätzen.EinBeitragzurLösung modernerFragenderArchitekturundmonumentalenPlastikunterbesondererBeziehungauf Wien .Wien: Graeser,1909

Schwarzbach,H., DieEntwicklungundPerspektivederkleinenStädte ber der socialistischen UmgestaltungdesSiedlungsnetzes. HochschulefürArchitekturundBauwesenWeimar, Dissertation,1969

Schwarzbach,H., EmpfehlungenzurAusarbeitungderlangfristigenKonzeptionKomplexer WohnungsbauimBezirk .BauakademiederDDR,ForschungsvorhabenSozialistischerStädte bau,1974

Schwarzbach,H., BlattsammlungSozialeAktivitätenundStadtgestaltung .Leipzig:Inst.Aus undWeiterbildungimBauwesen,1986

Schwarzbach,H., Researchonthequalityoflifeontheurbanmasterplan level .Conference paperoftheDDR,1976

Seifert.A .,NaturnähererWasserbau.DeutscheWasserwirtschaft ,1938;33(12),pp.361366

Stange,W.,Paschen,W., PraxishandbuchZukunftswerkstätten ,DGBJugendNordmark, Hamburg,1995

Striegnitz,Meinfried(ed.), UmdenKonsensstreiten– NeueVerfahrenderKonflikt bearbeitungdurchVerhandlungen.DokumentationderTagungderEvangelischenAkademie Loccumvom21.bis23.April1989 ,RehburgLoccum,1991

SunL.P., Zhuangxingheduanlie:gaigelilaizhongguoshehuijiegoudebianqian(Transfor mationandBreak:theChangeofChina’sSocialStructuresincetheReform). Beijing:Tsing hua Press,2004

Taylor,N., UrbanPlanningTheorySince1945 ,London:SagePublications,1998

TheMachuPicchuCharter,L’architettura,cronacheestoria,XXIII,pp.483485andpp.546 563.,1977

TheodoreJ.L.,TheEndofLiberalism: Ideology,Policy,andtheCrisisofPublicAuthority . NewYork:Norton,1969

Thompson,L., TheMindandHeartoftheNegotiator .NewJersey:PrenticeHall,1998

Tocqueville,A., DemocracyinAmerica ,NewYork:HarperPerennial,1988

187 Bibiliography

UmweltbehördeHamburg– Fachamt fürStadtgrünundErholung(ed.), Spielraum Sandbek: Sandbeker BewohnerplanenundgestaltenihrenStadtteil– eingemeinwesenorientiertes Planungsverfahren ,Hamburg,2001

UNCHS, VancouverDeclarationonHumanSettlements .ReportofHabitat:UnitedNations ConferenceonHumanSettlements,Vancouver,31Mayto11June1976.NewYork:United Nations,1976

UNCHS, IstanbulDeclarationonHumanSettlements .ReportoftheUnitedNations ConferenceonHumanSettlements(HabitatII),Istanbul,3 14June1996.NewYork: UnitedNations,1996

UNCHS, Slums:Past,PresentandFuture theCriticalRoleofPolicy ,NewYork:United Nations,2004.http://www.cin.gov.cn/habitat/en/zt/tz12

UNDP, EstablishingPartnershipPrinciples .NewYork:UnitedNations,2002 http://www.pppue.undp.org/toolkit/MOD080.htm

VeneKlasen,L.andMillerV., GuideforAdvocacyandCitizenParticipation .OklahomaCity, OK:World.Neighbours,2002

VonHayek,F., TheConstitutionofLiberty .London:Routledge andKegan Paul,1993

Walton,RichardE.andMcKersie,RobertB., ABehavioral TheoryofLabor Negotiations . Boston:McGrawHill,1965

Weisbord,M.,Janoff,S., FutureSearch– DieZukunftskonferenz.Wie Organisationen zu Zielsetzungen undgemeinsamem Handeln finden .Stuttgart,2001

WorldBank,PovertyHandbook.DiscussionPaper.WashingtonD.C.: WorldBank,1996

Wu,W.J.,StadtgestaltundStadtgestaltbedeutung:einVergleich anBeispielenausChina undWesteuropa.TUMunich,Dissertation.1993

Wu,F.L., China’sChangingUrbanGovernanceintheTraditiontowardsaMoreMarket OrientedEconomy ,UrbanStudies2002,39(7),pp.107193

Xinhua News, Jingji zengzhang fangshi zhuanbian deguanjian shigaibian zhengfu zhineng (ToReformGovernmentalInterventionisTheKeyIssuefortheTransformationoftheMode ofChina’sEconomicDevelopment). 2005.12.4http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2005 12/04/content_3874312.htm

Xu,J.L. Jindai zhongguo degongong lingyu:xingtai,gongneng yu ziwilijie – yi shanghai weili (TheForm,FunctionandSelfunderstandingonthePublicSphereinChina’sNeoteric Period aCaseStudyonShanghai), InSu,Z.L., Shanghai– jidai xin wenming dexingtai (TheFormoftheModernCultureinShanghai) .Shanghai,2004.CenturyExpress

Yiftachel,O., PlanningasControl:PolicyandResistanceinaDeeplyDividedSociety . ProgressinPlanning1995,Vol.44,pp.116–87

188 Bibiliography

Yu,K.J.andLi,D.H.,Chengshi jingguan zhilu (TheWayofUrbanLandscape) ,Beijing: ConstructionPress,2003

Zadow,A., Perspektivenwerkstatt.HintergründeundHandhabungdes`CommunityPlanning Weekend` .Berlin,1996

Zhong,B.T., ThegatedcommunityinShenzhen(Shenzhenfengbi shequ yanjiu). ArchitecturalJournal2003;9,pp.1519

Zhao,R.WandLiS., Zhongguo jümin shouru chajü dekuoda jiqi yuanzin (ThegrowingIn comegapofChineseresidentsanditsreasons) ,Jingji Yanjiu (EconomicStudies)1997:9, pp.1425.Beijing

Zhang,L.L., Congjianzhu zouxiang chengshi tanqi (FromArchitecturetotheCity) ,New ArchitectureJournal1996;1,pp.2733

Zhang,L.L.,HuangY.andZhaoW.F .,EinöffentlicherRaumfüreineNordostchinesiche Stadt .InHassenpflugD.(ed.), DieaufgeschlosseneStadt ,pp.7897.Weimar:VDG& Shanghai:Tongji,2004

Zhang,L.L.andMeng H., Changdi sheji (SitePlan). Beijing:ConstructionPress,1999

Zhang,L.L.andLi,C.D., Jianzhu siwei deguocheng yu biaoda (TheProcessesand ExpressionofArchitecturalIdeas) .Beijing:ConstructionPress,2001

Zhou,M.andLogan,J.R., MarketTransitionandtheCommodification ofHousinginUrban China, InternationalJournalofUrbanandRegionalResearch1996,Vol.20(3),pp.40021

Zukin,S., LandscapesofPower .Berkeley:UniversityofCalofornia Press,1991

189 190 Curriculum Vitae

Liu, Chong Geboren am24.Juni 1975inHeilongjiang,China

¢¢¢ Bildung 09/1987 07/1993 HighschoolBildung Qingdao 2.Schule,China 09/1993 07/1997 BachelorStudiumderArchitektur Qingdao InstitutfürArchitekturundBauwesen,China 09/1997 07/2000 MasterStudiumderArchitektur TechnischeUniversität Harbin,China 04/2002– 07/2006 PromotionanderFakultätArchitekturderBauhausUniversität WeimarimInternationalen Promotionsprogramm (IPP)desInstitut für Europäische Urbanistik (IfEU)

¢ Praktikum & Tätigkeiten 06/1999 09/1999 PraktikumbeiChinaNordostArchitektur&PlanungCo.Ltd.(Qingdao) 11/2001 12/2001 TätigkeitbeiNitschke+ Donath ArchitektenGmbH,Weimar 05/2002 10/2002 TätigkeitbeiHENNArchitekten,München

¢ Publikationen (ausgewählt) TheCharacterofUrbanDesigninModernQingdao.InChristW.&HassenpflugD.(Hrsg.), JahrbuchderModellprojekte2002,Weimar:BUW,2003 VonderFriedrichstrassezumPlatzdes4.Mai– ÖffentlicherRauminQingdao.In HassenpflugD.(Hrsg.),DieaufgeschlosseneStadt,Weimar:VDG& Shanghai:Tongji, 2004 GlobalisationandthePublicSpaceinChina,(mitXue,B.X.).InChinesische Architekturgesellschaft(Hrsg.),JahrbuchderChinesischenArchitekturgesellschaft, Beijing:ConstructionPress,2005 OnCivicOrientatedUrbanDevelopmentinChina,präsentiert aufKonferenz “HarvardProject forAsiaandInternationalRelations” (HPAIR),Tokio,2005

¢ Soziale Aktivitäten seit01/2000 MitgliedinderSektionfür“Achitektur&Umwelt” inderChinesischen Architekturgesellschaft Seit02/2001 MitgliedimAlumniderEuropäischenUrbanistikderBUW

¢Förderungen 10/200201/2005 GraduiertenförderungdesFreistaatThüringen

191 192 Announcement

Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung

Icherklärehiermitehrenwörtlich,dassichdievorliegendeArbeitohneunzulässigeHilfe DritterundohneBenutzungandereralsderangegebenenHilfsmittelangefertigthabe.Die aus anderen Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommenen Daten, Methoden und Konzepte sindunterAngabederQuellengekennzeichnet.

DieArbeitwurdebisherwederimIn nochimAuslandingleicheroderähnlicherForm eineranderenPrüfungsbehördevorgelegt.

Ichversichereehrenwörtlich,dassichnachbestem WissendiereineWahrheitgesagt undnichtsverschwiegenhabe.

Liu Chong

Weimar,dem12.September2006

193 194 195