Startup Studio
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Greater Seattle Innovation Ecosystem Report
2018 GREATER SEATTLE INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM REPORT R. Joe Ottinger Iinnovate Leadership Network [email protected] Denis Trapido Faculty Coordinator Jessica Partnow and Ella Stefoglo University of Washington Bothell, School of Business 1 February 2019 2018 Seattle Technology Ecosystem Study Dear Readers, Now in our fourth year, the Puget Sound Innovation Ecosystem Report is published in conjunction with the University of Washington. The initial impetus for the report was to help entrepreneurs in the Puget Sound Region (Greater Seattle) understand the resources available to them as tech start-ups and scale-ups. Over time, we have expanded the report with the belief that a healthy innovation economy can improve companies, communities, and lives. We are happy to share our insights with you as we continue to explore building a healthy innovation economy. This 2018 report is our most ambitious to date, and includes the networks of investors, professionals, service providers and other resources supporting tech, health & life sciences, women in tech, commercial real estate, and Government elements of our Greater Seattle innovation ecosystem. A big thank you is due to the University of Washington Bothell, and the Greater Seattle innovation community of leaders, investors, service providers, and professionals for making this year’s report possible. We hope find it to be a valuable resource, and look forward to receiving your feedback at info@ innovatenetwork.com so we can improve future reports. Best wishes for a great 2019! R. Joe Ottinger CEO of Iinnovate Leadership Network P.S. Please Note that most everything that is underlined in the report is a Hyperlink to make it easier to contact the resources that could be helpful to you! 2018 Seattle Technology Ecosystem Study 2 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Iinnovate Leadership Network (pronounced “I innovate”) is an advisory firm and leadership network helping companies succeed in today’s innovation economy. -
Thesis Paper
THESIS PAPER The Startup Studio as a form of Business Model Innovation. A comparative study on the case of Founders Copenhagen as a Startup Studio, compared to more traditional models of Venture Capital Funding. Abstract The purpose of this research paper is to assess the value of a relatively new form of venture capital funding, The Startup Studio, which offers a new approach to financing and supporting ventures in their early stages. In order to gain a comprehensive analysis of the new form venture funding compared to traditional models, this research adapts theories of Business Model Innovation, Pluralistic Leadership and Innovation Management, as a way of showing the value-adding benefits of the Startup Studio model. Using the case study of Founders, a Danish startup studio based in Copenhagen, this research will show, through primary data gathered at the company, that the startup studio business model offers young ventures a much more stable and attainable form of support, in the processing of launching a startup. The reader will see that traditional models of funding are not only unattainable for many early stage startups, but also that their extreme growth models can be considered damaging to venture longevity. David Michael Jackson [email protected] Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Problem Area And Motivation ......................................................................................................... -
Il Venture Building Model
Cattedra di Economia e Gestione delle Imprese IL VENTURE BUILDING MODEL Prof. Matteo Caroli Simone Cangelosi RELATORE CANDIDATO Anno Accademico 2019/2020 Matricola: 220831 1 2 Alla mia famiglia, 3 INDICE INTRODUZIONE ................................................................................................................................... 5 CAPITOLO 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 7 PRESENTAZIONE DEL VENTURE BUILDING MODEL .................................................................... 7 1.1. PREMESSA ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.2 Entrepreneurial Recycling ....................................................................................................... 11 1.2 TRATTI STORICI DEL VENTURE BUILDER COME “START-UP STUDIO” .......................................... 12 1.2.1 Entrepreneurship-Ecosystem e Startup-Ecosystem ................................................................. 12 1.3 LA DIFFERENZA CON INCUBATORI, ACCELERATORI E BUSINESS ANGELS NEL PANORAMA DEGLI EARLY-STAGE INVESTMENTS ............................................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Il panorama degli Early -Stage Investment Funding .............................................................. 16 1.3.1. Un confronto con i business angel ......................................................................................... -
The Startup Studio: New Phenomenon Or Rebranding of Existing Support?
The Startup Studio: New Phenomenon or Rebranding of Existing Support? by Maximilian Haffen Lamm & Jack Peters May 2019 Master’s Programme in Entrepreneurship & Innovation Supervisor: Hans Landström Examiner: Gustav Hägg Abstract Research Problem - Considering the increasing trend towards startup studios in the business world, the literature does not provide much information regarding these start-up support organisations. In recent years, researchers have put their attention on accelerators, creating a broad understanding of this concept. It is important for entrepreneurs to be aware of the different support organisations available. Research Aim - The study explored both an accelerator and a startup studio to understand what they want to achieve, how they intend to achieve it, and how they operate to realise this. Thus, to know whether startup studios are a new phenomenon or another name for already existing supports. Methods - The study used a qualitative semi-structured interview base with one accelerator and one startup studio. In total, thirteen interviews were conducted exposing different perspectives to better understand these two structures. An analysis of four entrepreneurial methods was conducted to better distinguish their work. Results - The results highlighted differences between the organisations, in terms of both their business models and their approach to supporting start-ups. There were similarities and differences with regards to the entrepreneurial methods promoted and utilised at each organisation, with their aims, motivations and philosophy being strong influencing factors as to why. Implications - The startup studio studied, differed to several aspects of the literate covering accelerators. Literature on startup studios is limited, therefore, future research is recommended, especially through quantitative methods to find a generalisable result.