Foundation Document Acadia National Park Maine September 2016 Acadia National Park Foundation Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foundation Document Acadia National Park Maine September 2016 Acadia National Park Foundation Document NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Acadia National Park Maine September 2016 Acadia National Park Foundation Document To Ellsworth to Bangor Bangor Bucksport 1A 26mi 1 3 42km 19mi 20mi 31km 32km Ellsworth 18mi 1 29km 15 Augusta to Bangor 3 Gouldsboro 76mi 172 West Gouldsboro 122km 186 195 Belfast 6mi 186 20mi 10km Blue Hill 95 3 32km 47mi Passenger 76km ferry 3 Bar Winter Harbor 15 Harbor 1 36mi 3 58km 102 Augusta Schoodic Peninsula 27mi Southwest Northeast Augusta to Portland Harbor Detail 57mi 43km Harbor 92km Deer Bass Harbor To Isle Portland Camden Mount Desert Vehicle ferry Island Detail Stonington Swans Island Passenger 35mi ferry ACADIA NATIONAL PARK 56km Rockland Isle au Haut 1 Detail Wiscasset to Portland 0 20 Kilometers 46mi 76km Wiscasset 0 20 Miles Acadia National Park Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Park Purpose 5 Park Significance 6 Fundamental Resources and Values 7 Other Important Resources and Values 10 Interpretive Themes 11 Part 2: Dynamic Components 12 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 12 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 12 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs 13 Planning and Data Needs 15 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 23 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values 44 Part 3: Contributors 51 Acadia National Park 51 NPS Northeast Region 51 NPS Denver Service Center, Planning Division 51 Appendixes 52 Appendix A: Enabling Legislation and Legislative Acts for Acadia National Park 52 Appendix B: Inventory of Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 69 Appendix C: Past and Ongoing Park Planning Efforts 72 Foundation Document Acadia National Park Mission of the National Park Service The National Park Service (NPS) preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The National Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. The NPS core values are a framework in which the National Park Service accomplishes its mission. They express the manner in which, both individually and collectively, the National Park Service pursues its mission. The NPS core values are: · Shared stewardship: We share a commitment to resource stewardship with the global preservation community. · Excellence: We strive continually to learn and improve so that we may achieve the highest ideals of public service. · Integrity: We deal honestly and fairly with the public and one another. · Tradition: We are proud of it; we learn from it; we are not bound by it. · Respect: We embrace each other’s differences so that we may enrich the well-being of everyone. The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department of the Interior. While numerous national park system units were created prior to 1916, it was not until August 25, 1916, that President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Park Service Organic Act formally establishing the National Park Service. The national park system continues to grow and comprises more than 400 park units covering more than 84 million acres in every state, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. These units include, but are not limited to, national parks, monuments, battlefields, military parks, historical parks, historic sites, lakeshores, seashores, recreation areas, scenic rivers and trails, and the White House. The variety and diversity of park units throughout the nation require a strong commitment to resource stewardship and management to ensure both the protection and enjoyment of these resources for future generations. The arrowhead was authorized as the official National Park Service emblem by the Secretary of the Interior on July 20, 1951. The sequoia tree and bison represent vegetation and wildlife, the mountains and water represent scenic and recreational values, and the arrowhead represents historical and archeological values. 1 Foundation Document Introduction Every unit of the national park system will have a foundational document to provide basic guidance for planning and management decisions—a foundation for planning and management. The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park as well as the park’s purpose, significance, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. The foundation document also includes special mandates and administrative commitments, an assessment of planning and data needs that identifies planning issues, planning products to be developed, and the associated studies and data required for park planning. Along with the core components, the assessment provides a focus for park planning activities and establishes a baseline from which planning documents are developed. A primary benefit of developing a foundation document is the opportunity to integrate and coordinate all kinds and levels of planning from a single, shared understanding of what is most important about the park. The process of developing a foundation document begins with gathering and integrating information about the park. Next, this information is refined and focused to determine what the most important attributes of the park are. The process of preparing a foundation document aids park managers, staff, and the public in identifying and clearly stating in one document the essential information that is necessary for park management to consider when determining future planning efforts, outlining key planning issues, and protecting resources and values that are integral to park purpose and identity. While not included in this document, a park atlas is also part of a foundation project. The atlas is a series of maps compiled from available geographic information system (GIS) data on natural and cultural resources, visitor use patterns, facilities, and other topics. It serves as a GIS-based support tool for planning and park operations. The atlas is published as a (hard copy) paper product and as geospatial data for use in a web mapping environment. The park atlas for Acadia National Park can be accessed online at: http://insideparkatlas.nps.gov/. 2 Acadia National Park Part 1: Core Components The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park, park purpose, significance statements, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. These components are core because they typically do not change over time. Core components are expected to be used in future planning and management efforts. Brief Description of the Park Acadia National Park preserves approximately 50,000 acres in Hancock and Knox Counties in the northeastern United States along the mid-section of the Maine coast. The park consists of portions of Mount Desert Island plus a portion of Isle au Haut to the southwest of Mount Desert Island, the tip of the Schoodic Peninsula on the mainland to the east, and most of or portions of 16 smaller outlying islands. The park also preserves more than 13,000 acres in conservation easements across its legislated boundary, which runs from the Penobscot River ship channel to just east of the Schoodic Peninsula. The park was created to protect the natural beauty of the highest mountains and rocky headlands along the Atlantic shore of the United States. Significant resources include a glaciated coastal and island landscape, an abundance of habitats, a high level of biodiversity, clean air and water, and a rich cultural heritage. Acadia National Park was established in 1916 as Sieur de Monts National Monument and incorporated into Lafayette National Park in 1919 as the first national park east of the Mississippi River. Much of the land comprising the park was donated from private landowners; a practice that continued throughout much of the 20th century. Congress authorized the National Park Service to accept a donation of land on the Schoodic Peninsula in 1929 when the park’s current name was adopted. In 1986, Congress granted the National Park Service authority to exchange, or purchase from willing sellers, selected inholdings in an effort to remove private inholdings in the park; transfer ownership of selected noncontiguous parcels; establish a more permanent and contiguous park boundary; continue the authority to accept conservation easements to protect scenic, ecological, and cultural values; and establish a park advisory commission. The park advisory commission was reauthorized for an additional 20 years in 2006. Acadia National Park is in a transition zone between temperate deciduous and northern coniferous forests along the Gulf of Maine and Atlantic flyway, overlying glacially sculpted granite mountains with interspersed glacially scoured lake beds and bounded by rocky headlands. Noteworthy natural resources include both coniferous and deciduous coastal spruce-fir forest, subalpine communities, heaths and marshes, an exceptionally diverse flora, over 40 species of mammals, and documented sightings of over 300 bird species. The land forms of the park illustrate the dynamics of many geologic processes including all three rock types, plate tectonics, volcanism, glaciations, and shoreline erosion. The power of glaciers is evident in U-shaped valleys and cliffs, while
Recommended publications
  • Atlantic Flyway Shorebird Initiative
    2021 GRANT SLATE Atlantic Flyway Shorebird Initiative NFWF CONTACTS Bridget Collins Senior Manager, Private Lands and Bird Conservation, [email protected] 202-297-6759 Scott Hall Senior Scientist, Bird Conservation [email protected] 202-595-2422 PARTNERS Red knots ABOUT NFWF Chartered by Congress in 1984, OVERVIEW the National Fish and Wildlife The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), the US Fish and Wildlife Service and Foundation (NFWF) protects and Southern Company announce a fourth year of funding for the Atlantic Flyway Shorebird restores the nation’s fish, wildlife, program. Six new or continuing shorebird conservation grants totaling nearly $625,000 plants and habitats. Working with were awarded. These six awards generated $656,665 in match from grantees, for a total federal, corporate and individual conservation impact of $1.28 million. Overall, this slate of projects will improve habitat partners, NFWF has funded more management on more than 50,000 acres, conduct outreach to more than 100,000 people, than 5,000 organizations and and will complete a groundbreaking, science-based toolkit to help managers successfully generated a total conservation reduce human disturbance of shorebirds year-round. impact of $6.1 billion. The Atlantic Flyway Shorebirds program aims to increase populations for three focal Learn more at www.nfwf.org species by improving habitat functionality and condition at critical sites, supporting the species’ full annual lifecycles. The Atlantic Flyway Shorebird business plan outlines NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS strategies to address key stressors for the American oystercatcher, red knot and whimbrel. 1133 15th Street, NW Suite 1000 approaches to address habitat loss, predation, and human disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • 17-AIR-14868165-National Parks Ebook Fnl
    AIRSTREAM’S FAVORITE NATIONAL PARKS EXPLORE AMERICA’S ENDLESS BEAUTY Airstream was created by and for those who deeply revere this reaDy For Adventure wide world around us, and so much beauty is right here in the U.S. The 59 U.S. national parks protect some of our most stun- The new Airstream Basecamp is designed for those who are as ning natural spaces, preserving them not just for today but for adventurous as they are spontaneous. It’s lightweight, rugged, and generations to come. ready for any road trip – the perfect national parks companion. We’ve put together a list of our 10 favorite national parks across • On-board restroom and kitchen the country, along with info about what you’ll see there. Whether • Comfortably sleeps 2 you’re an Airstreamer, a Dreamer, or an In-Betweener, let this be the inspiration you need to get out there and explore our nation’s • Towable with most SUVs natural wonders. TABLE OF CONTENTS Glacier National Park // 1 Mammoth Cave National Park // 7 Redwood National Park // 2 Acadia National Park // 8 Olympic National Park // 3 Great Smoky Mountains National Park // 9 Grand Canyon National Park // 4 Everglades National Park // 10 Arches National Park // 5 Leave it Beautiful // 11 Yosemite National Park // 6 GLACIER NATIONAL PARK Northern Montana E st. 0 5. 11.1910 Named for the glacier activity that created the park’s geography Main attractions things to know Wildlife: Grizzly bears, moose, mountain Weather conditions can cause some parts of goats, mountain lions, and more the park to close in winter1 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Mercury Issues Detailed on Updated
    661313_book:661313_book 5/3/07 8:31 AM Page 9 Airborne mercury issues Mercury Issues,” which gives a brief, topical overview detailed on updated NPS Web site that is useful in communicating mercury issues in parks, and links to other relevant Web sites. Among the links are Rising levels of mercury in the global atmosphere and Web sites that detail mercury thresholds for selected increasing recognition of its effects on ecosystems has wildlife and national, regional, state, and park-specific raised concerns for mercury impacts on National Park information on mercury effects on health and the envi- System lands. In aquatic ecosystems, mercury can be ronment. Many national parks, for example, are located readily transformed into bio-available methylmercury, where fish consumption advisories are statewide (i.e., not and accumulation of this contaminant in the environment focused solely on specific water bodies). These include can result in fish consumption advisories and increases of national park units in the Great Lakes region and north- mercury toxicity in predatory animals such as common eastern United States. loons and alligators. Recent studies have also shown that Human activities have greatly increased the amount of mercury is accumulating in terrestrial ecosystems, with mercury cycling in the atmosphere, soils, lakes, and elevated levels of mercury documented in invertebrates, streams through processes such as burning coal for elec- forest songbirds, and mammals across the tricity and incinerating municipal, hazardous, and med- United States (Schweiger et al. 2006; ical waste. Although mercury is a growing Evers 2005; Environmental Protection Control of local sources of global problem, recently published Agency 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Island Explorer Short Range Transit Plan
    Island Explorer Short Range Transit Plan FINAL REPORT Prepared for the National Park Service and the Maine Department of Transportation May 21, 2007 ISLAND EXPLORER SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction and Summary 1.1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________________________ 1-1 1.3 Summary of Key findings________________________________________________________________ 1-3 Chapter 2: Review of Previous Studies 2.1 Phase 2 Report: Seasonal Public Transportation on MDI (1997) _________________________________ 2-1 2.2 Visitor Center and Transportation Facility Needs (2002) ________________________________________ 2-2 2.3 Intermodal Transportation Hub Charrette (2002) ______________________________________________ 2-2 2.4 Year-round Transit Plan for Mount Desert island (2003) ________________________________________ 2-3 2.5 Bangor-Trenton Transportation Alternatives Study (2004)_______________________________________ 2-3 2.6 Visitor Use Management Strategy for Acadia National Park (2003) _______________________________ 2-7 2.7 Visitor Capacity Charrette for Acadia National Park (2002)______________________________________ 2-9 2.8 Acadia National Park Visitor Census Reports (2002-2003) _____________________________________ 2-10 2.9 MDI Tomorrow Commu8nity Survey (2004) _______________________________________________ 2-12 2.10 Strategic Management Plan: Route 3 corridor and Trenton Village (2005) ________________________ 2-13 Chapter 3: Onboard Surveys of Island Explorer Passengers
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Log Explore Acadia Checklist Island Explorer Bus See the Ocean and Forest from the Top of a Schedule Inside! Mountain
    National Park Service Acadia National Park U.S. Department of the Kids Interior Acadia Beaver Log Explore Acadia Checklist Island Explorer Bus See the ocean and forest from the top of a Schedule Inside! mountain. Listen to a bubbly waterfall or stream. Examine a beaver lodge and dam. Hear the ocean waves crash into the shore. Smell a balsam fir tree. Camping & Picnicking Acadia's Partners Seasonal camping is provided within the park on Chat with a park ranger. Eastern National Bookstore Mount Desert Island. Blackwoods Campground is Eastern National is a non-profit partner which Watch the stars or look for moonlight located 5 miles south of Bar Harbor and Seawall provides educational materials such as books, shining on the sea. Campground is located 5 miles south of Southwest maps, videos, and posters at the Hulls Cove Visitor Hear the night sounds of insects, owls, Harbor. Private campgrounds are also found Center, the Sieur de Monts Nature Center, and the and coyote. throughout the island. Blackwoods Campground park campgrounds. Members earn discounts while often fills months in advance. Once at the park, Feel the sand and sea with your bare feet. supporting research and education in the park. For all sites are first come, first served. Reservations information visit: www.easternnational.org 2012 Observe and learn about these plants and in advance are highly recommended. Before you animals living in the park: arrive, visit www.recreation.gov Friends of Acadia bat beaver blueberry bush Friends of Acadia is an independent nonprofit Welcome to Acadia! cattail coyote deer Campground Fees & organization dedicated to ensuring the long-term Going Green in Acadia! National Parks play an important role in dragonfly frog fox Reservations protection of the natural and cultural resources Fare-free Island Explorer shuttle buses begin helping Americans shape a healthy lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maine Geologist, Is Published for All Members Three Times a Year
    AL SO C IC IET G Y June, 2000 O L O O F E G M A THE MAINE E I H N T E GEOLOGIST Volume 26 1 9 74 NEWSLETTER OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MAINE Number 2 The President’s Message presented and promoted by supporters to Congress and staff on May 10th. It was described as "an We are almost half way into the year 2000 and a attempt to debunk Darwinism evolutionary theory year and a half into my term of office, and it does and expose the negative social impact of Darwin." seem that time passes at the speed of light! Thanks This briefing took place as the Senate entered into its to the creativity of our membership, this year has second week of debate on over-hauling federal K-12 already produced several successful events: (1) a education programs. I'm not sure that this bodes joint meeting with the Society of Civil Engineers; (2) well for science, education or religion! a magnificent spring meeting at Bowdoin College In response to this growing anti-intellectual at- where a variety of excellent and very professional mosphere, it might be helpful for the science com- student papers were given (one from Vermont!), munity in Maine to establish an entity which can be followed by an important and timely presentation by available to serious policy makers and upon request Al Ludman on his geologic work in Washington respond to science-related issues. I suggest a Maine County; and (3) also at Bowdoin the quintessential Academy of Sciences might be helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackwoods Campground Other Name: N/A
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) / / '2L. United States Department of the Interior (# { National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is used in nominating or requesting determinations of individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "X" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor or computer to complete all items. X New Submission_______^___Amended Submission_____________^_______^_______ 1. Name of Property______________________________________________ historic name: Blackwoods Campground other name: n/a 2. Location_____________________________________________________ street & number: Acadia National Park Q] not for publication city or town: Rte 233, Eagle Lake Rd., Bar Harbor | vicinity state: Maine code: ME county: Hancock code: 009 zip code: 04693 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this 0"nomination Q request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property G meets G does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Acadia National Park N'atlona IP Ar Ks Ervlce
    ',./ Acadia National Park N'atlona IP ar kS ervlCe. " u.s. Department of the Interior VISITOR SATISFACTION AND VISITOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ACADIA NATIONAL PARK: 2006 Meeting the Requirements of the Governnient Performance and Results Act Charles Jacobi, Natural Resource Specialist November 2006 Acadia National Park Natural Resources Report Number 2006-8 SUMMARY In 2006, the National Park Service measured visitor satisfaction and visitor understanding of the significance ofthe park they were visiting through a brief visitor survey. Acadia National Park participated in this survey, which was intended to meet the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). The response rate for the survey was 31 %. In a brief report, the University of Idaho Cooperative Park Studies Unit compiled the results of visitor evaluations of park facilities, services, and recreation opportunities (GPRA goal Hal) at Acadia. Ninety-five percent of visitors were satisfied with the overall quality of visitor facilities, services, and recreation opportunities offered by Acadia. This was equal to the 2006 GPRA servicewide goal of 95%. Responses to questions about the quality of specific facilities or services showed there is limited room for improvement. Visitor responses to the question about the significance of Acadia National Park (GPRA goal Hb 1) were compared to significance statements identified in the park's GPRA plan. According to servicewide standards for evaluating answers to this question (visitor identification of at least one park significance item), 96% of Acadia visitors understand something about the significance . of Acadia. This is well above the 2006 GPRA service wide goal of 87%.
    [Show full text]
  • History That Promotes Understanding in a Diverse Society 145 View
    The Future of History The Future of History HISTORIANS, HISTORICAL ORGANIZATIONS, AND THE PROSPECTS FOR THE FIELD Conrad Edick Wright & Katheryn P. Viens, editors, Published by the Massachusetts Historical Society, Boston 2017 © 2017 Massachusetts Historical Society Contributors retain rights for their essays. Designed by Ondine Le Blanc Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Wright, Conrad Edick, editor of compilation. | Viens, Katheryn P., 1962- editor of compilation. Title: The future of history : historians, historical organizations, and prospects for the field / Conrad Edick Wright and Katheryn P. Viens, editors. Other titles: Historians, historical organizations, and prospects for the field Description: Boston : Massachusetts Historical Society, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2017019926 | ISBN 9781936520114 (pbk.) Subjects: LCSH: History--Study and teaching. | Historians. | History--Societies, etc. Classification: LCC D16.2 .F87 2017 | DDC 907.1--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017019926 Digital editions of this title are available at the MHS website. www.masshist.org/publications/future_history Katheryn P. Viens | Introduction: 1 Finding Meaning in the Past John Stauffer | History Is 8 the Activist’s Muse Richard Rabinowitz | History in Every 20 Sense: Public and Academic History Paul J. Erickson | History and the 31 Future of the Digital Humanities Louise Mirrer | What Does History 47 Cost and How Can We Pay for It? Gretchen Sullivan Sorin | The Future 57 of History: Egg Rolls, Egg Creams and Empanadas Debra Block | History Education 68 in the (Mis)Information Age Manisha Sinha | History 79 and Its Discontents John Lauritz Larson | The Feedback 89 Loop: Sharing the Process of Telling Stories Robert Townsend | Academic History’s 98 Challenges and Opportunities Stephen A.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H1518
    H1518 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE March 13, 2018 Mr. CURTIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield retary of the Interior (referred to in this National Park Advisory Commission in ac- back the balance of my time. title as the ‘Secretary’), by publication in cordance with section 103 of Public Law 99– The SPEAKER pro tempore. The the Federal Register of a revised boundary 420 (16 U.S.C. 341 note). question is on the motion offered by map or other description, may make— (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 103 ‘‘(A) such technical boundary revisions as of Public Law 99–420 (16 U.S.C. 341 note) is the gentleman from Utah (Mr. CURTIS) the Secretary determines to be appropriate amended by striking subsection (f). that the House suspend the rules and to the permanent boundaries of the Park (in- SEC. 5. REPEAL OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELAT- pass the bill, H.R. 3469. cluding any property of the Park located ING TO ACADIA NATIONAL PARK. The question was taken; and (two- within the Schoodic Peninsula and Isle Au The following are repealed: thirds being in the affirmative) the Haut districts) to resolve issues resulting (1) Section 3 of the Act of February 26, 1919 rules were suspended and the bill was from causes such as survey error or changed (40 Stat. 1178, chapter 45). passed. road alignments; and (2) The first section of the Act of January A motion to reconsider was laid on ‘‘(B) such limited boundary revisions as 19, 1929 (45 Stat. 1083, chapter 77). the table. the Secretary determines to be appropriate SEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvest Distribution and Derivation of Atlantic Flyway Canada Geese
    Articles Harvest Distribution and Derivation of Atlantic Flyway Canada Geese Jon D. Klimstra,* Paul I. Padding U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 11510 American Holly Drive, Laurel, Maryland 20708 Abstract Harvest management of Canada geese Branta canadensis is complicated by the fact that temperate- and subarctic- breeding geese occur in many of the same areas during fall and winter hunting seasons. These populations cannot readily be distinguished, thereby complicating efforts to estimate population-specific harvest and evaluate harvest strategies. In the Atlantic Flyway, annual banding and population monitoring programs are in place for subarctic- breeding (North Atlantic Population, Southern James Bay Population, and Atlantic Population) and temperate- breeding (Atlantic Flyway Resident Population [AFRP]) Canada geese. We used a combination of direct band recoveries and estimated population sizes to determine the distribution and derivation of the harvest of those four populations during the 2004–2005 through 2008–2009 hunting seasons. Most AFRP geese were harvested during the special September season (42%) and regular season (54%) and were primarily taken in the state or province in which they were banded. Nearly all of the special season harvest was AFRP birds: 98% during September seasons and 89% during late seasons. The regular season harvest in Atlantic Flyway states was also primarily AFRP geese (62%), followed in importance by the Atlantic Population (33%). In contrast, harvest in eastern Canada consisted mainly of subarctic geese (42% Atlantic Population, 17% North Atlantic Population, and 6% Southern James Bay Population), with temperate- breeding geese making up the rest. Spring and summer harvest was difficult to characterize because band reporting rates for subsistence hunters are poorly understood; consequently, we were unable to determine the magnitude of subsistence harvest definitively.
    [Show full text]