Volume 2, Chapter 16-6: Bird Nests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume 2, Chapter 16-6: Bird Nests Glime, J. M. 2017. Bird Nests – Passeriformes, part 1. Chapt. 16-6. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological 16-6-1 Interaction. eBook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 16-6 BIRD NESTS – PASSERIFORMES, PART 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Passeriformes: Perching Birds ........................................................................................................................ 16-6-2 Tyrannidae – Tyrant Flycatchers .............................................................................................................. 16-6-2 Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) ....................................................................................... 16-6-3 Yellow-bellied Flycatcher (Empidonax flaviventris) ......................................................................... 16-6-3 Pacific-slope Flycatcher (Empidonax difficilis) ................................................................................. 16-6-4 Hammond's Flycatcher (Empidonax hammondii) .............................................................................. 16-6-5 Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe) ..................................................................................................... 16-6-6 Eastern Kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus) .............................................................................................. 16-6-8 Yellow-bellied Chat-tyrant (Ochthoeca diadema) ............................................................................. 16-6-9 Crowned Chat-tyrant (Ochthoeca frontalis) ...................................................................................... 16-6-9 Laniidae – Shrikes ................................................................................................................................... 16-6-10 Vireonidae – Typical Vireos ................................................................................................................... 16-6-10 Rhipiduridae ............................................................................................................................................ 16-6-11 Monarchidae ........................................................................................................................................... 16-6-11 Corvidae – Jays, Magpies, and Crows .................................................................................................... 16-6-12 Common Raven (Corvus corax) ...................................................................................................... 16-6-13 Hirundinidae – Swallows ........................................................................................................................ 16-6-14 Tree Swallow (Trachycieta bicolor) ................................................................................................ 16-6-14 Paridae – True Tits .................................................................................................................................. 16-6-14 Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) ............................................................................... 16-6-17 Carolina Chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) ...................................................................................... 16-6-17 Varied Tit (Sittiparus varius) ........................................................................................................... 16-6-21 Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), Great Tit (Parus major), and Japanese Tit (Parus minor) ............. 16-6-21 Ground Tit (Pseudopodoces humilis) .............................................................................................. 16-6-24 Pipridae – Manakins, Piprites ................................................................................................................. 16-6-24 Black-capped Piprites (Piprites pileata) .......................................................................................... 16-6-24 Aegithalidae – Long-tailed Tits .............................................................................................................. 16-6-24 Long-Tailed Tit (Aegithalos caudatus) ............................................................................................ 16-6-25 Sittidae – Nuthatches .............................................................................................................................. 16-6-25 Red-Breasted Nuthatch (Sitta canadensis) ....................................................................................... 16-6-26 Certhiidae – Holarctic Treecreepers ........................................................................................................ 16-6-26 Troglodytidae – Wrens ............................................................................................................................ 16-6-26 Carolina Wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus) ..................................................................................... 16-6-27 Pacific Wren (Troglodytes pacificus) and Winter Wren (T. hiemalis) ............................................. 16-6-28 Eastern Winter Wren (Troglodytes hiemalis) .................................................................................. 16-6-28 Eurasian Wren (Troglodytes troglodytes) ........................................................................................ 16-6-28 Cinclidae – Dippers ................................................................................................................................. 16-6-29 Brown Dipper (Cinclus pallasii) ...................................................................................................... 16-6-31 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 16-6-31 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................... 16-6-31 Literature Cited .............................................................................................................................................. 16-6-31 16-6-2 Chapter 16-6: Bird Nests – Passeriformes, part 1 2 CHAPTER 16-6 BIRD NESTS – PASSERIFORMES, PART 1 Figure 1. Moss nest from the Pacific Northwest, USA. The bryophytes include Isothecium and Neckera. Photo courtesy of Jerilyn Peck. Passeriformes: Perching Birds seem to be no data on the success of birds reared in nests made totally of mosses. Mosses and lichens alter the nest This is a large order (>5000 species) and comprises cup size, with the inner nest cup being narrower when more most of the birds that use bryophytes in their nests. But are used (Slagsvold 1989). Use of mosses and lichens also then, it also includes more than half the bird species in the depends on season, with those birds nesting early in the world (Wikipedia 2017). The order is distinguished by breeding season using significantly more mosses and having three toes pointing forward and one pointing back, lichens than are used in later nests. permitting these to be perching birds. Passerines also are In coniferous forests, bryophytes are often abundant. altricial (hatched or born in undeveloped state and Several species of birds that breed there build nests requiring care and feeding by parents). Richardson (1981) reports that a quarter of the bird exclusively of bryophytes. These include the Winter Wren species breeding in Great Britain use bryophytes in the (see below; Hejl et al. 2002), Marbled Murrelet (see construction of their nests. Hansell (2000) likewise reports Chapter 16-7; Nelson 1997), and Golden-crowned Kinglet that numerous small to medium-sized bird species use (see Chapter 16-7; Ingold & Galati 1997). In addition, bryophytes. Sakai (1988) described a Hammond Flycatcher nest (see Large passerine birds tend to build larger nests relative below) made with two epiphytic lichens and five to their body size when compared to small birds (Slagsvold bryophytes, including the epiphytic moss Isothecium sp. 1989). The depth of the inner nest cup size of these birds (Figure 11) and liverwort, Porella navicularis (Figure 17). does not relate to the size of the bird. Birds that nest off the ground in open nests have a narrow nest cup, but those with Tyrannidae – Tyrant Flycatchers a domed nest or which build in a cavity have a broad nest cup. Birds in exposed nests are less likely to survive than Wolf (2009) found fifteen species of Tyrannidae that those reared in nest cavities (Nice 1937, 1957). There use bryophytes in their nests in North America: Chapter 16-6: Bird Nests – Passeriformes, part 1 16-6-3 Contopus sordidulus (Western Wood-Pewee; Figure 2) Yellow-bellied Flycatcher (Empidonax Empidonax flaviventris (Yellow-bellied Flycatcher; Figure 4) flaviventris) Empidonax alnorum (Alder Flycatcher; Figure 5) Empidonax minimus (Least Flycatcher; Figure 6) In the eastern United States, Yellow-bellied Flycatcher Empidonax difficilis (Pacific-slope Flycatcher; Figure 7-Figure 8) (Empidonax flaviventris; Figure 4) nests close to mature Empidonax hammondii (Hammond's Flycatcher; Figure 13) stands of lowland coniferous forest (Harrison 1975; Hawrot Empidonax occidentalis (Cordilleran Flycatcher; Figure 18) & Niemi 1996). These forests often have a well-developed Sayornis nigricans (Black Phoebe; Figure 19) layer of mosses
Recommended publications
  • Elbroch Et Al 2017 Benefiting from Carrion Provided by Pumas
    Biological Conservation 215 (2017) 123–131 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Short communication Vertebrate diversity benefiting from carrion provided by pumas and other MARK subordinate, apex felids ⁎ L. Mark Elbroch , Connor O'Malley, Michelle Peziol, Howard B. Quigley Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10018, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Carrion promotes biodiversity and ecosystem stability, and large carnivores provide this resource throughout the Biodiversity year. In particular, apex felids subordinate to other carnivores contribute more carrion to ecological commu- Carnivores nities than other predators. We measured vertebrate scavenger diversity at puma (Puma concolor) kills in the Food webs Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, and utilized a model-comparison approach to determine what variables influ- Scavenging enced scavenger diversity (Shannon's H) at carcasses. We documented the highest vertebrate scavenger diversity of any study to date (39 birds and mammals). Scavengers represented 10.9% of local birds and 28.3% of local mammals, emphasizing the diversity of food-web vectors supported by pumas, and the positive contributions of pumas and potentially other subordinate, apex felids to ecological stability. Scavenger diversity at carcasses was most influenced by the length of time the carcass was sampled, and the biological variables, temperature and prey weight. Nevertheless, diversity was relatively consistent across carcasses. We also identified six additional stalk- and-ambush carnivores weighing > 20 kg, that feed on prey larger than themselves, and are subordinate to other predators. Together with pumas, these seven felids may provide distinctive ecological functions through their disproportionate production of carrion and subsequent contributions to biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recovery Plan Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax Traillii Extimus)
    Final Recovery Plan Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) August 2002 Prepared By Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Team Technical Subgroup For Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 Approved: Date: Disclaimer Recovery Plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved Recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Some of the techniques outlined for recovery efforts in this plan are completely new regarding this subspecies. Therefore, the cost and time estimates are approximations. Citations This document should be cited as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Plan. Albuquerque, New Mexico. i-ix + 210 pp., Appendices A-O Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Service Reference Service 5430 Governor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301/492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 i This Recovery Plan was prepared by the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Team, Technical Subgroup: Deborah M.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Scrub-Jay Funerals: Cacophonous Aggregations in Response to Dead Conspecifics
    Animal Behaviour 84 (2012) 1103e1111 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Western scrub-jay funerals: cacophonous aggregations in response to dead conspecifics T. L. Iglesias a,b,*, R. McElreath a,c, G. L. Patricelli a,b a Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, U.S.A. b Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, U.S.A. c Department of Anthropology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, U.S.A. article info All organisms must contend with the risk of injury or death; many animals reduce this danger by Article history: assessing environmental cues to avoid areas of elevated risk. However, little is known about how Received 23 October 2011 organisms respond to one of the most salient visual cues of risk: a dead conspecific. Here we show that Initial acceptance 16 January 2012 the sight of a dead conspecific is sufficient to induce alarm calling and subsequent risk-reducing Final acceptance 25 July 2012 behavioural modification in western scrub-jays, Aphelocoma californica, and is similar to the response Available online 27 August 2012 to a predator (a great horned owl, Bubo virginianus, model). Discovery of a dead conspecific elicits MS. number: A12-00867R vocalizations that are effective at attracting conspecifics, which then also vocalize, thereby resulting in a cacophonous aggregation. Presentations of prostrate dead conspecifics and predator mounts elicited Keywords: aggregations and hundreds of long-range communication vocalizations, while novel objects did not. In Aphelocoma californica contrast to presentations of prostrate dead conspecifics, presentations of a jay skin mounted in an bird upright, life-like pose elicited aggressive responses, suggesting the mounted scrub-jay was perceived to cacophonous aggregation cues of risk be alive and the prostrate jay was not.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 90 Records of the “Western Flycatcher” in Florida, With
    Florida Field Naturalist 48(3):90–98, 2020. RECORDS OF THE “WESTERN FLYCATCHER” IN FLORIDA, WITH EMPHASIS ON A VOCAL INDIVIDUAL THAT UTTERED CALL-NOTES CONSISTENT WITH PACIFIC-SLOPE FLYCATCHER (Empidonax difficilis) BILL PRANTY,1 DONALD FRASER,2 AND VALERI PONZO3 18515 Village Mill Row, Bayonet Point, Florida 34667-2662 Email: billpranty@hotmail.com 22181 Gulf View Boulevard, Dunedin, Florida 34698 Email: dmfraser31@gmail.com 3725 Center Road, Sarasota, Florida 34240 Email: anibirdbrain@gmail.com In 1989, members of the American Ornithologists’ Union Check-list Committee (American Ornithologists’ Union 1989) agreed that the Western Flycatcher (Empidonax difficilis) complex consisted of two species: the Pacific-slope Flycatcher E.( difficilis) and the Cordilleran Flycatcher (E. occidentalis). These former subspecies were elevated to species status based on Johnson (1980) and Johnson and Marten (1988), who reported on apparent genetic and vocal differences and assortative pairing. However, Johnson (1980, 1994) found a mixed population breeding in northern California, and Rush et al. (2009) found hybridization and introgression in southwestern Canada. These discoveries have led some ornithologists to suggest that the two taxa should not have been elevated to separate species. Outside of the hybrid zones, however, Pacific-slope Flycatchers and Cordilleran Flycatchers maintain separate populations, with consistent genetic and vocal differences (Rush et al. 2009). The “Western Flycatcher” was not known to occur in Florida until recently (Robertson and Woolfenden 1992, Stevenson and Anderson 1994, Greenlaw et al. 2014). Pranty (1996) cited a probable report at Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa County, Florida, on 28 December 1995 by Bob, Lucy, and Scot Duncan. The first verifiable record was thought to have been discovered in 2015, but an earlier, unpublished record, dating to 2004, was posted to eBird ten years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Itinerary
    Itinerary for Birding Formosa October 24 - Nov. 2, 2015 *Bold for endemics Day Date/Meals Due to Dateline - Flights from SFO depart on Oct. 22 to arrive TPE on Oct. 23 0 Oct. 23/Fri. Arriving Taoyuan International Airport (TPE) -Air fare not included -/-/- Taking Hotel's shuttle bus from terminal 1/2 to the hotel and checking in by yourselves (early check-in charge may apply if checking in before 3:00p.m.) Overnight: Hotel near Taipei Taoyuan Airport (not included in base cost) Breakfast and trip inception at Novotel 1 Oct. 24/Sat. Bird watching in Taipei Botanic Garden -/L/D Looking for Black-browed Barbet , Malayan Night-heron, Japanese White-eye, Gray Treepie, Black-napped Blue Monarch Transferring to Hualian(4 hours) Overnight: Hualian 2 Oct. 25/Sun. Bird watching in Hualien & Taroko National Park (2000+ m/6600+ ft) B/L/D Looking for Styan’s Bulbul, Taiwan Whistling Thrush Transferring to Cingjing(4 hours) Overnight: Cingjing 3 Oct. 26/Mon. Bird watching in Mt. Hehuan Route (3000+ m/9900+ ft) B/L/D Looking for White-whiskered Laughingthrush, Flamecrest, Collared Bush-Robin, Alpine Accentor, Vinaceous Rosefinch, Coal Tit, Winter Wren, Taiwan Fulvetta Transferring to Huisun(1.5 hours) Overnight: Huisun 4 Oct. 27/Tue. Bird watching in Huisun (1000 m/3300 ft) B/L/D Looking for White-eared Sibia, Taiwan Yuhina, Yellow Tit, Fire-breasted Flowerpeckers, Formosan Magpie, Taiwan Barbet , Gray-cheeked Fulvetta, Chinese Bamboo Partridge, Malayan Night Heron Transferring to Alishan(3+ hours) Overnight: Alishan 5 Oct. 28/Wed. Bird watching in Alishan (2000+ m/6600+ ft) and Tataka, Yushan (2600m/8600 ft) B/L/D Looking for Collared Bush Robin, Taiwan Yuhina, Yellow Tit , Rufouscrowned Laughingthrush, Taiwan Wren-Babbler , Coal Tit, Green-backed Tit, Black-throated Tit, Flamecrest, Mikado Pheasant, Steere’s Liocichla , Taiwan Bush Warbler, Rusty Laughingthrush Transferring to Tainan(2.5 hours) Overnight: Tainan 6 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • EIA & EMP Report
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN OF River bed mining of Minor Minerals Block No. 11, K-Mirhama Upstream Vishu Nalla Proposal No. SIA/JK/MIN/60760/2021 File No. JKEIAA/2021/476 Block no. 11 Area 9.21 HA Production 1,93,410TPA Location Village – Dhamhal Hanjipora, Tehsil- D.H. Pora District- Kulgam, Jammu & Kashmir APPLICANT Shri. Hem Chand Singh S/o Sh. Rohitash Singh R/o H.No.06 Kashish Enclave 3K Road Ludhiana, State/UT: Punjab Table of Content Draft EIA/EMP for Riverbed Mining Project of Minor Mineral in Block No.11, K-Mirhama Upstream Vishu Nalla, District-Kulgam, State-Jammu & Kashmir. (Area 9.21) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS TITLE PAGE NO CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 Purpose of the Report 1 1.1 Identification of project & project proponent 2 1.2 Brief description of project 3 1.3 Scope of the Study 7 CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.0 Type of Project 32 2.1 Need for the project 32 2.2 Location Details 32 2.3 Topography & Geology 34 2.4 Geological Reserve 36 2.5 Conceptual Mining Plan 38 2.6 Anticipated Life of Mine 38 2.7 General Features 38 CHAPTER 3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS 3.0 General 42 3.1 Land Environment of the Study Area 43 3.2 Water Environment 45 3.3 Air Environment 53 3.4 Soil Environment 58 3.5 Noise Characteristics 61 3.6 Biological Environment 63 3.7 Socio-Economic Environment 84 CHAPTER 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES 4.0 General 99 4.1 Land Environment 99 4.2 Water Environment 100 4.3 Air Environment 101 4.4 Noise Environnent 104 TC-2 Table of Content Draft EIA/EMP for Riverbed Mining Project of Minor Mineral in Block No.11, K-Mirhama Upstream Vishu Nalla, District-Kulgam, State-Jammu & Kashmir.
    [Show full text]
  • Corvids of Cañada
    !!! ! CORVIDS OF CAÑADA COMMON RAVEN (Corvus corax) AMERICAN CROW (Corvus brachyrhyncos) YELLOW-BILLED MAGPIE (Pica nuttalli) STELLER’S JAY (Cyanocitta stelleri) WESTERN SCRUB-JAY Aphelocoma californica) Five of the ten California birds in the Family Corvidae are represented here at the Cañada de los Osos Ecological Reserve. Page 1 The Common Raven is the largest and can be found in the cold of the Arctic and the extreme heat of Death Valley. It has shown itself to be one of the most intelligent of all birds. It is a supreme predator and scavenger, quite sociable at certain times of the year and a devoted partner and parent with its mate. The American Crow is black, like the Raven, but noticeably smaller. Particularly in the fall, it may occur in huge foraging or roosting flocks. Crows can be a problem for farmers at times of the year and a best friend at other times, when crops are under attack from insects or when those insects are hiding in dried up leftovers such as mummified almonds. Crows know where those destructive navel orange worms are. Smaller birds do their best to harass crows because they recognize the threat they are to their eggs and young. Crows, ravens and magpies are important members of the highway clean-up crew when it comes to roadkills. The very attractive Yellow-billed Magpie tends to nest in loose colonies and forms larger flocks in late summer or fall. In the central valley of California, they can be a problem in almond and fruit orchards, but they also are adept at catching harmful insect pests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Occurrence of Black Phoebe (Sayornis Nigricans) in British Columbia
    The Status and Occurrence of Black Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin. Introduction and Distribution The Black Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans) is a small passerine belonging to the tyrant-flycatcher family. The Black Phoebe occurs as a year-round resident throughout most of its range; however, its northern populations are partially migratory (Wahl et al. 2005). It is a species found throughout the year from southwestern Oregon south, through California including the Baja Peninsula (excluding the central regions of the Peninsula), east through Arizona, New Mexico, southern Colorado, west Texas, south through Mexico, Central America to Panama (excluding El Salvador) and in South America from the coastal mountains of Venezuela, through Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, to western Bolivia and northwestern Argentina (Sibley 2000, Howell and Webb 2010, Hoyo et al. 2006). In the past couple of decades the Black Phoebe has been slowly expanding its known range northward into northern Oregon and southern Washington where it is still considered a very rare visitor, but with records increasing every year (Wahl et al. 2005, WBRC 2012). The Black Phoebe has been recorded from Idaho, Nevada, Utah, southern Oklahoma and Florida (Sibley 2000). The Black Phoebe is an accidental visitor to south-central Alaska (Gibson et al. 2013). In British Columbia this species is considered a casual visitor but Provincial records, like those of Washington State, are on the rise and the status of this species in British Columbia could change in the near future. Identification and Similar Species The Black Phoebe has a huge range that encompasses two continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Landbird Monitoring in the Sonoran Desert Network 2012 Annual Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Landbird Monitoring in the Sonoran Desert Network 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SODN/NRTR—2013/744 ON THE COVER Hooded Oriole (Icterus cucullatus). Photo by Moez Ali. Landbird Monitoring in the Sonoran Desert Network 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SODN/NRTR—2013/744 Authors Moez Ali Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory 230 Cherry Street, Suite 150 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Kristen Beaupré National Park Service Sonoran Desert Network 7660 E. Broadway Blvd, Suite 303 Tucson, Arizona 85710 Patricia Valentine-Darby University of West Florida Department of Biology 11000 University Parkway Pensacola, Florida 32514 Chris White Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory 230 Cherry Street, Suite 150 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Project Contact Robert E. Bennetts National Park Service Southern Plains Network Capulin Volcano National Monument PO Box 40 Des Moines, New Mexico 88418 May 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colora- do, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource manage- ment, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
    [Show full text]