arXiv:1903.01437v3 [math.RA] 12 Oct 2019 ymti rcesstsyn h so-called algebra gravity the satisfying brackets symmetric fGnbr n arnv[8,t h operad the to [18], Kapranov and Ginzburg of hc ecle the called he which ftemdl pcso imn pee with spheres Riemann of spaces moduli the of ooycasso the of classes mology ad[7 seas eih 2]frsm ata eut) T fo results). be partial some can for topology, [29] Menichi string also by fo (see inspired [37] degree, Ward less some or shifting after more manifold, examples, compact smooth a of aiod seas ai 3,C.III]). Ch. [30, Manin also hypercommutati (see called manifolds also are which over algebras points, n[] hsadSlia hwdta the that knowledge, showed best Sullivan authors’ and Chas the [5], to In algebra, gravity of example n19,Gtlr[5 hwdthat, showed [15] Getzler 1994, In .Clb-a n ymti rbnu lers9 12 4 References quantization Deformation 7. duality Koszul algebras Poisson Frobenius and 6. Poisson Unimodular algebras Frobenius 5. symmetric and Batalin-Vilkovisk Calabi-Yau and duality with 4. calculus Differential algebra gravity to 3. algebra Batalin-Vilkovisky From 2. Introduction 1. eie xmlsfo oooia edtere [5 Theo ([15, theories field topological from examples Besides RVT LER TUTR NTENGTV CYCLIC NEGATIVE THE ON STRUCTURE ALGEBRA GRAVITY r lodsusdudrsm diinlconditions. additional some under discussed relationships also The are algebras. Poisson unimo Frobenius algebras, unimodular alge Frobenius of symmetric classes several algebras, of Calabi-Yau cohomology cyclic the or homology Abstract. eltrsoe n[6 that [16] in showed later He . OOOYO AAIYUALGEBRAS CALABI-YAU OF HOMOLOGY IOU HN AKO SMTV N ELILIU LEILEI AND ESHMATOV, FARKHOD CHEN, XIAOJUN nti ae,w td h rvt ler tutr nten the on structure algebra gravity the study we paper, this In rvt operad gravity compactified n hta ler vri osssasqec fskew- of sequence a consists it over algebra an that and , ouisae fReanshrswith spheres Riemann of spaces moduli 1. { H Introduction Contents • ( M S 1 0 1 euvrathmlg ftefe opspace loop free the of homology -equivariant eeaie aoiidentity Jacobi generalized ,n { +1 H { n • ) H } ( M h olcino h oooyclasses homology the of collection the , akdpit,frsa operad, an forms points, marked 1 + • ( M 0 ,n +1 0 ,n mn hs rvt algebras gravity these among rs hs lersinclude: algebras These bras. ua oso lers and algebras, Poisson dular eagba rfra Frobenius formal or algebras ve ) eewrsso httecyclic the that show works hese +1 } e .],tefis nontrivial first the 4.6]), rem ) m rvt ler.More algebra. gravity a rms sKsu ul ntesense the in dual, Koszul is rssfo tigtopology. string from arises n nWseln 3]and [38] Westerland in und lers8 algebras y } h olcino h ho- the of collection the , gtv cyclic egative hc ecalled he which , n marked 1 + 25 21 16 1 2 X. CHEN, F. ESHMATOV, AND L. LIU cohomology of a symmetric Frobenius (or more generally cyclic A∞) algebra, which is the algebraic model of the S1-equivariant homology of the free loop spaces, has a nontrivial gravity algebra structure. A symmetric Frobenius algebra is an associative algebra with a non-degenerate sym- metric pairing. Let us recall two facts on this algebra: (i) if a symmetric Frobenius algebra is Koszul, then its Koszul dual is a Calabi-Yau algebra, a notion introduced by Ginzburg in [17] (see Van den Bergh [36, Theorem 12.1] for a proof); (ii) the cyclic cohomology of an algebra is isomorphic to the negative cyclic homology of its Koszul dual (see [7, Theorem 37] for a proof). From these two facts one deduces that there is a gravity algebra structure on the negative cyclic homology of a Koszul Calabi-Yau algebra (see Ward [37, Example 6.5]). It is then naturally expected that for arbitrary Calabi-Yau algebras which are not necessarily Koszul, such gravity structure still exists on their negative cyclic homology. In loc cit Ward wrote “How to directly construct the higher brackets comprising this [gravity] structure on the Calabi-Yau side is an open question”. The purpose of this paper is to answer this open question. To this end, let us first − recall that for a mixed complex (C•, b, B), if we denote by HH• and HC• its Hochschild homology (that is, the homology of (C•, b)) and its negative cyclic homology, then we have the long exact sequence
− − π∗ β − ··· −→ HC•+2 −→ HC• −→ HH• −→ HC•+1 −→ · · · , The main result of the current paper is the following slightly technical result:
Theorem 1.1. (1) For a mixed (C•, b, B), if HH• has a Batalin-Vilkovisky algebra struc- ture such that B is the generator of the Gerstenhaber bracket, then the following sequence of maps − ⊗n − (HC• ) −→ HC• (n−1)|x1|+(n−2)|x2|+···+|xn−1| r r r (x1, · · · ,xn) 7−→ (−1) β π∗(x1) π∗(x2) · · · π∗(xn) , r − for n = 2, 3, · · · , where is the product on the Hochschild homology, give on HC• a gravity algebra structure. (2) Suppose ′ ′ ′ f : (C•, b, B) −→ (C•, b ,B ) is a quasi-isomorphism of mixed complexes and furthermore suppose that (HH•(C),B) ′ ′ and (HH•(C ),B ) are extended to Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras such that f∗ is a Batalin- − − ′ Vilkovisky algebra isomorphism. Then HC• (C) and HC• (C ) are isomorphic as gravity algebras.
The following complexes satisfy the conditions of the above theorem (more details of these complexes will be given in later sections): (1) the mixed cyclic complex of a Calabi-Yau algebra, (2) the mixed cyclic cochain complex of a symmetric Frobenius algebra, (3) the mixed Poisson complex of a unimodular Poisson algebra, and (4) the mixed Poisson cochain comlex of a unimodular Frobenius Poisson algebra. GRAVITY ALGEBRA STRUCTURE ON THE NEGATIVE CYCLIC HOMOLOGY 3
As a corollary, the negative cyclic homology or cyclic cohomology of the above four types of complexes all have a gravity algebra structure. These structures (the brackets) are nontrivial in general; for example, it contains a graded Lie algebra which is related to the deformations of the corresponding algebras, which are in general obstructed (see also Remark 4.7 (2)). We make the following two remarks:
Remark 1.2. (i) The above case (1) gives an answer to Ward’s problem at the homol- ogy level. In loc cit he also asked for a homotopical, or say, chain level, construction of the Batalin-Vilkovisky and gravity structure for general Calabi-Yau algebras. Such construction seems to exist; see Remark 2.6 for some more discussions. (ii) The above case (2) covers the example of symmetric Frobenius algebras, which is not new. In fact, in [37] Ward showed that the mixed cyclic cochain complex of symmetric Frobenius algebras is an algebra over the (chain) gravity operad, hence Theorem 1.1 is a direct corollary of his result in this case. In the subsequent paper [3] Campos and Ward proved a more general result saying that any mixed complex over the (chain) gravity operad induces the gravity algebra structure on its negative cyclic homology (see loc cit Corollary 1.33 and Example 1.34).
It will then be very interesting to find the relationships among these gravity algebras. In fact, we find that:
(a) if the algebras in the above cases (1) and (2) are Koszul dual to each other, then the corresponding two gravity algebras are isomorphic (partially given in [7, Theorem 37]); (b) if the Poisson algebras in the above cases (3) and (4) are Koszul dual to each other (this means the Poisson algebra is the polynomials with a quadratic Poisson structure), then the corresponding two gravity algebras are also isomorphic; (c) by a result of Dolgushev [10] saying that the deformation quantization of a unimod- ular Poisson algebra is a Calabi-Yau algebra, the negative cyclic Poisson homology of the algebra in the above case (3) is then isomorphic to the negative cyclic ho- mology of its deformation quantization given in the case (1); (d) by a result of Felder-Shoikhet [11] and Willwacher-Calaque [40] saying that the de- formation quantization of a unimodular Frobenius Poisson algebra is a symmetric Frobenius algebra, the cyclic Poisson cohomology of the algebra in the case (4) is then isomorphic to the cyclic cohomology of its deformation quantization given in the case (2).
In particular, starting from quadratic, unimodular Poisson polynomials, we have the fol- lowing correspondence:
Quadratic unimodular Koszul duality Quadratic unimodular o / (1.1) Poisson algebra Frobenius Poisson algebra
deformation quantization deformation quantization Koszul duality Symmetric Frobenius Calabi-Yau algebra o / algebra 4 X. CHEN, F. ESHMATOV, AND L. LIU
And therefore in this case, all the gravity algebras arising from the above (1)–(4) cases are isomorphic. This work is a sequel to [6], where the same classes of algebras are studied, and the associated Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras are identified. We had planned to put the results of this paper as an appendix of that one, which, however, turns out to be too long. Moreover, we think Theorem 1.1 and its corollaries have their own virtue, and it is better to write a separate paper. Finally, we mention that when we were finishing the current paper, we learned of the preprint of D. Fiorenza and N. Kowalzig [12], where the Lie algebra structure on the negative cyclic homology are also studied. Nevertheless, our primary goals and main interests are quite different. Convention. Throughout this paper, we work over a ground field k of characteristic 0 containing R. All vector spaces, their tensors and morphisms are graded over k unless otherwise specified. Algebras are unital and augmented over k. All DG algebras/modules are graded such that the differential has degree −1, and for a chain complex, its cohomology • q is H (−) := H−•(−); for example, an element in the q-th Hochschild cochain group CH (A) has grading −q. Acknowledgements. We would like to thank Bruno Vallette and the anonymous referee for correcting some inaccuracies and improving the presentations of the paper. This work is partially supported by NSFC No. 11671281 and 11890663.
2. From Batalin-Vilkovisky algebra to gravity algebra
Gravity algebras are closely related to Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras. In this section we first recall the definition of Batalin-Vilkovisky and gravity algebras; some more back- grounds, and especially their relationships to topological conformal field theories, can be found in Getzler [14, 15, 16]. After that, we prove Theorem 1.1. Definition 2.1 (Batalin-Vilkovisky algebra). Suppose (V, r) is a graded commutative algebra. A Batalin-Vilkovisky algebra structure on V is the triple (V, r, ∆) such that (1) ∆ : V i → V i−1 is a differential, that is, ∆2 = 0; and (2) ∆ is a second order operator, that is, ∆(a rb rc) = ∆(a rb) rc + (−1)|a|a r∆(b rc) + (−1)(|a|−1)|b|b r∆(a rc) −(∆a) rb rc − (−1)|a|a r(∆b) rc − (−1)|a|+|b|a rb r(∆c), (2.1) for all homogeneous a, b, c ∈ V .
Equivalently, if we set the bracket [a, b] := (−1)|a|+1(∆(a rb) − ∆(a) rb − (−1)|a|a r∆(b)), then [−, −] is a derivation with respect to r for each argument. In other words, a Batalin- Vilkovisky algebra is a Gerstenhaber algebra (V, r, [−, −]) with a differential ∆ : V i → V i−1 such that [a, b] = (−1)|a|+1(∆(a rb) − ∆(a) rb − (−1)|a|a r∆(b)), for a, b ∈ V . ∆ is called the Batalin-Vilkovisky operator, or the generator of the Gersten- haber bracket. GRAVITY ALGEBRA STRUCTURE ON THE NEGATIVE CYCLIC HOMOLOGY 5
From (2.1) one also obtains that ∆ being of second order implies that
r r r ∆(x1 x2 · · · xn) n ǫij r r |x1|+···+|xi−1| = (−1) ∆(xi xj) x1 · · · xˆi · · · xˆj · · · xn − (−1) x1 · · · ∆(xi) · · · xn, Xi Definition 2.2 (Gravity algebra). Suppose V is a (graded) vector space over k. Then a gravity algebra structure on V consists of a sequence of (graded) skew symmetric operators (called the higher Lie brackets) ⊗n {x1, · · · ,xn} : V → V, n = 2, 3, · · · such that ǫij (−1) {{xi,xj},x1, · · · , xˆi, · · · , xˆj, · · · ,xn,y1, · · · ,ym} 1≤Xi From the definition, one also obtains that (V, {−, −}) forms a graded Lie algebra. Definition 2.3 (Cyclic homology; cf. Jones [19] and Kassel [20]). Suppose (C•, b, B) is a mixed complex, with |d| = −1 and |B| = 1. Let u be a free variable of degree −2 which commutes with b and B. The negative cyclic, periodic cyclic, and cyclic chain complex of C• are the following complexes (C•[[u]], b + uB), −1 (C•[[u, u ], b + uB), −1 (C•[[u, u ]/uC•[[u]], b + uB), − per and are denoted by CC• (C•), CC• (C•) and CC•(C•) respectively. The associated ho- mology are called the negative cyclic, periodic cyclic and cyclic homology of C•, and are − per denoted by HC• (C•), HC• (C•) and HC•(C•) respectively. In the following, if C• is clear from the context, we sometimes simply write, for example, − − HC• instead of HC• (C•). As usual, HH• denotes the Hochschild homology of C•, which is the b-homology of the mixed complex. Remark 2.4 (Cyclic cohomology). Suppose (C•, b, B) is a mixed cochain complex, namely |b| = 1 and |B| = −1. By negating the degrees of C•, we obtain a mixed chain complex, denoted by (C−•, b, B) with |b| = −1 and |B| = 1. By our convention, the cyclic cohomol- ogy of (C•, b, B), denoted by HC•(C•), is the cohomology of the negative cyclic complex of (C−•, b, B). 6 X. CHEN, F. ESHMATOV, AND L. LIU Consider the short exact sequence − ι − π 0 −→ u · CC•+2 −→ CC• −→ C• −→ 0, − − where ι : u · CC•+2 → CC• is the embedding and − π :CC• −→ C• i xi · u 7−→ x0 Xi is the projection. It induces functorially a long exact sequence − − π∗ β − ··· −→ HC•+2 −→ HC• −→ HH• −→ HC•+1 −→ · · · , (2.4) − − ∼ − where we have applied that HC• (u · CC•+2) = HC•+2. It is obvious that β ◦ π∗ = 0 and we claim that (cf. [5, 7]): Lemma 2.5. With the above notations, we have π∗ ◦ β = B : HH•(C•, b) → HH•+1(C•, b). Proof. In fact, for any x ∈ C• which is b-closed, from the following diagram − ι − π 0 / u · CC• / CC• / C• / 0 b+uB b+uB b − ι − π 0 / u · CC•−1 / CC•−1 / C•−1 / 0 b+uB b+uB b we have, up to a boundary, −1 −1 −1 −1 − ι ◦ (b + uB) ◦ π (x)= ι ◦ (b + uB)(x)= ι (u · B(x)) = u · B(x) ∈ u · CC•−1. − ∼ − − Via the isomorphism u · CC• = CC•+2, this element u · B(x) is mapped to B(x) ∈ CC•+1, and under π it is mapped to B(x). Thus π∗ ◦ β = B as desired. − Proof of Theorem 1.1. (1) Recall that for homogeneous x1,x2, · · · ,xn ∈ HC• , (n−1)|x1|+(n−2)|x2|+···+|xn−1| r r r {x1,x2, · · · ,xn} := (−1) β π∗(x1) π∗(x2) · · · π∗(xn) . (2.5) r We first show the graded skew-symmetry. Since the multiplication on HH• is graded commutative, by commutativity it is sufficient to show (|x1|+1)(|x2|+1) {x1,x2, · · · ,xn} + (−1) {x2,x1, · · · ,xn} = 0. In fact, (|x1|+1)(|x2|+1) {x1,x2, · · · ,xn} + (−1) {x2,x1, · · · ,xn} (n−1)|x1|+(n−2)|x2|+···+|xn−1| r r r = (−1) β π∗(x1) π∗(x2) · · · π∗(xn) (|x1|+1)(|x2|+1) (n−1)|x 2|+(n−2)|x1|+···+|xn−1| r r r +(−1) · (−1) β π∗(x2) π∗(x1) · · · π∗(xn) (n−1)|x1|+(n−2)|x2|+···+|xn−1| r r r = (−1) β π∗(x1) π∗(x2) · · · π∗(xn) |x1||x2|+(n−2)|x2|+(n−1)|x1|+··· +|xn−1| |x1||x2| r r r −(−1) · (−1) β π∗(x1) π∗(x2) · · · π∗(xn) GRAVITY ALGEBRA STRUCTURE ON THE NEGATIVE CYCLIC HOMOLOGY 7 = 0. Next, we show the graded Jacobi identity. First, ǫij (−1) {{xi,xj},x1, · · · , xˆi, · · · , xˆj, · · · ,xn} Xi ǫij r r \ \ = (−1) β π∗(β(π∗(xi) π∗(xj))) π∗(x1) · · · π∗(xi) · · · π∗(xj) · · · π∗(xn) Xi