DOCSLIB.ORG

View This Volume's Front and Back Matter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View This Volume's Front and Back Matter University LECTURE Series Volume 63 Noncommutative Motives Gonçalo Tabuada American Mathematical Society Noncommutative Motives http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/ulect/063 University LECTURE Series Volume 63 Noncommutative Motives Gonçalo Tabuada American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Jordan S. Ellenberg Robert Guralnik William P. Minicozzi II (Chair) Tatiana Toro 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14A22, 14C15, 18D20; Secondary 18E30, 18G55, 19D55. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/ulect-63 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Tabuada, Gon¸calo, 1979– Noncommutative motives / Gon¸calo Tabuada. pages cm. – (University lecture series ; volume 63) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4704-2397-1 (alk. paper) 1. Motives (Mathematics) 2. Noncommutative algebras. 3. Algebraic varieties. I. Title. QA564.T33 2015 516.35–dc23 2015018204 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Permissions to reuse portions of AMS publication content are handled by Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. For more information, please visit: http://www.ams.org/rightslink. Send requests for translation rights and licensed reprints to [email protected]. Excluded from these provisions is material for which the author holds copyright. In such cases, requests for permission to reuse or reprint material should be addressed directly to the author(s). Copyright ownership is indicated on the copyright page, or on the lower right-hand corner of the first page of each article within proceedings volumes. c 2015 by Gon¸calo Tabuada. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ∞ The paper used in this book is acid-free and falls within the guidelines established to ensure permanence and durability. Visit the AMS home page at http://www.ams.org/ 10987654321 201918171615 To Lily, for not being by my side. Contents Preface ix Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Differential graded categories 3 1.1. Definitions 3 1.2. Quasi-equivalences 5 1.3. Drinfeld’s DG quotient 11 1.4. Pretriangulated equivalences 13 1.5. Bondal-Kapranov’s pretriangulated envelope 14 1.6. Morita equivalences 15 1.7. Kontsevich’s smooth proper dg categories 16 Chapter 2. Additive invariants 21 2.1. Definitions 21 2.2. Examples 22 2.3. Universal additive invariant 26 2.4. Computations 29 2.5. Lefschetz’s fixed point formula 32 Chapter 3. Background on pure motives 35 Chapter 4. Noncommutative pure motives 41 4.1. Noncommutative Chow motives 41 4.2. Relation with Chow motives 41 4.3. Relation with Merkurjev-Panin’s motives 46 4.4. Noncommutative ⊗-nilpotent motives 47 4.5. Noncommutative homological motives 47 4.6. Noncommutative numerical motives 48 4.7. Kontsevich’s noncommutative numerical motives 49 4.8. Semi-simplicity 50 4.9. Noncommutative Artin motives 52 4.10. Functoriality 53 4.11. Weil restriction 54 Chapter 5. Noncommutative (standard) conjectures 57 5.1. Standard conjecture of type Cnc 57 5.2. Standard conjecture of type Dnc 58 5.3. Noncommutative nilpotence conjecture 59 5.4. Kimura-finiteness 59 5.5. All together 60 vii viii CONTENTS Chapter 6. Noncommutative motivic Galois groups 63 6.1. Definitions 63 6.2. Relation with motivic Galois groups 65 6.3. Unconditional version 65 6.4. Base-change short exact sequence 66 Chapter 7. Jacobians of noncommutative Chow motives 69 Chapter 8. Localizing invariants 71 8.1. Definitions 71 8.2. Examples 72 8.3. Universal localizing invariant 73 8.4. Additivity 77 8.5. A1-homotopy 79 8.6. Algebraic K-theory 82 8.7. Witt vectors 84 8.8. Natural transformations 85 Chapter 9. Noncommutative mixed motives 87 9.1. Definitions 87 9.2. Relation with noncommutative Chow motives 89 9.3. Weight structure 89 9.4. Relation with Morel-Voevodsky’s motivic homotopy theory 90 9.5. Relation with Voevodsky’s geometric mixed motives 91 9.6. Relation with Levine’s mixed motives 93 9.7. Noncommutative mixed Artin motives 93 9.8. Kimura-finiteness 94 9.9. Coefficients 95 Chapter 10. Noncommutative motivic Hopf dg algebras 97 10.1. Definitions 97 10.2. Base-change short exact sequence 98 Appendix A. Grothendieck derivators 99 A.1. Definitions 99 A.2. Left Bousfield localization 101 A.3. Stabilization and spectral enrichment 102 A.4. Filtered homotopy colimits 102 A.5. Symmetric monoidal structures 103 Bibliography 105 Index 113 Preface Alexandre Grothendieck conceived his definition of motives in the 1960s. By that time, it was already established that there exist several cohomology theories for, say, smooth projective algebraic varieties defined over a given field k,and A. Weil’s brilliant insight about counting points over finite fields via the Lefschetz trace formula was validated. With his characteristic passion for unification and “naturality”, Grothendieck wanted to construct a universal cohomology theory (with, say, coefficients R)that had to be a functor h from the category Var(k)ofsmoothk-varieties to an abelian tensor category Mot(k) of “(pure) motives” (or Mot(k)R,whereR is a ring of coefficients), satisfying a minimal list of expected properties. Grothendieck also suggested a definition of Mot(k) and of the motivic functor. It consisted of several steps. For the first step, one keeps objects of Var(k), but replaces its morphisms by correspondences. This passage implies that morphisms Y → X now form an additive group,orevenanR-module rather than simply a set. Moreover, cor- respondences themselves are not just cycles on X × Y but classes of such cycles modulo an “adequate” equivalence relation. The coarsest such relation is that of numerical equivalence, when two equidimensional cycles are equivalent if their in- tersection indices with each cycle of complementary dimension coincide. The finest one is the rational (Chow) equivalence, when equivalent cycles are fibres of a family parametrized by a chain of rational curves. The direct product of varieties induces the tensor product structure on the category. The second step in the definition of the relevant category of pure motives consists in a formal construction of new objects (and relevant morphisms) that are “pieces” of varieties: kernels and images of projectors, i.e., correspondences p : X → X with p2 = p. This produces a pseudo-abelian,orKaroubian completion of the category. In this new category, the projective line P1 becomes the direct sum of (motive of) a point and the Lefschetz motive L (intuitively corresponding to the affine line). The third, and last step of the construction, is one more formal enhancement of the class of objects: they now include all integer tensor powers L⊗n,notjust non-negative ones, and tensor products of these with other motives. An important role is played by L−1 which is called the Tate motive T. The first twenty-five years of the development of the theory of motives were summarised in the informative Proceedings of the 1991 Research Conference con- ference “Motives”, published in two volumes by the AMS in 1994. By that time it was already clear that the richness of ideas and problems involved in this project resists any simple-minded notion of “unification”, and with time, the theory of motives was more and more resembling a Borgesian garden ix xPREFACE of forking paths. Each strand of the initial project tended to unfold in its own direction, whereas the central stumbling stone on the Grothendieck visionary road, the Standard Conjectures, resisted and still resists all efforts. The book by Gon¸calo Tabuada is a dense combination of a survey paper and a research monograph dedicated to the development of the theory of motives during the next twenty five years. The author contributed many important results and techniques in the theory in recent years. In this book, he focuses on the so-called “noncommutative motives”. I will make a few brief comments about the scope of this subject. In very general terms, one can say that motivic constructions of the New Age start not only with smooth varieties but rather with triangulated categories and their enhancements, dg categories. Classical varieties fit there by supplying their derived and more general enhanced derived categories, such as categories of perfect complexes. Enhancement essentially means that morphisms rather than objects are treated as complexes, complexes modulo homotopy, etc. Hence the usual categorical framework is no longer sufficient: we must deal with 2-categories and eventually with categories of higher level. Correspondences between such “varieties” are introduced using Morita-like constructions. Recall that in the basic Morita theory morphisms between non- necessarily commutative rings A → B are replaced with (A, B)-bimodules, and that the difference between commutative and noncommutative rings in this frame- work essentially vanishes because any commutative ring is Morita equivalent to the ring of matrices of any given order over it. One of the first great surprises of this insight transplanted into (projective) algebraic geometry was Alexander Beilinson’s discovery (1983) that the derived category of coherent sheaves of a projective space can be described as a triangu- lated category made out of modules over a Grassmann algebra. In particular, a projective space became “affine” in some kind of noncommutative geometry! The development of Beilinson’s technique led to a general machinery describing tri- angulated categories in terms of exceptional systems and expanding the realm of candidates to the role of noncommutative motives. Thus the abstract properties of the categories constructed in this way justify the intuition and terminology of “noncommutative geometry” which was one mo- tivation for M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Book of Involutions
    The Book of Involutions Max-Albert Knus Alexander Sergejvich Merkurjev Herbert Markus Rost Jean-Pierre Tignol @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Book of Involutions Max-Albert Knus Alexander Merkurjev Markus Rost Jean-Pierre Tignol Author address: Dept. Mathematik, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zurich,¨ Switzerland E-mail address: [email protected] URL: http://www.math.ethz.ch/~knus/ Dept. of Mathematics, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095-1555, USA E-mail address: [email protected] URL: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~merkurev/ NWF I - Mathematik, Universitat¨ Regensburg, D-93040 Regens- burg, Germany E-mail address: [email protected] URL: http://www.physik.uni-regensburg.de/~rom03516/ Departement´ de mathematique,´ Universite´ catholique de Louvain, Chemin du Cyclotron 2, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium E-mail address: [email protected] URL: http://www.math.ucl.ac.be/tignol/ Contents Pr´eface . ix Introduction . xi Conventions and Notations . xv Chapter I. Involutions and Hermitian Forms . 1 1. Central Simple Algebras . 3 x 1.A. Fundamental theorems . 3 1.B. One-sided ideals in central simple algebras . 5 1.C. Severi-Brauer varieties . 9 2. Involutions . 13 x 2.A. Involutions of the first kind . 13 2.B. Involutions of the second kind . 20 2.C. Examples . 23 2.D. Lie and Jordan structures . 27 3. Existence of Involutions . 31 x 3.A. Existence of involutions of the first kind . 32 3.B. Existence of involutions of the second kind . 36 4. Hermitian Forms . 41 x 4.A. Adjoint involutions . 42 4.B. Extension of involutions and transfer .
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Motivation Behind the Theory of Motives?
    What is the motivation behind the Theory of Motives? Barry Mazur How much of the algebraic topology of a connected simplicial complex X is captured by its one-dimensional cohomology? Specifically, how much do you know about X when you know H1(X, Z) alone? For a (nearly tautological) answer put GX := the compact, connected abelian Lie group (i.e., product of circles) which is the Pontrjagin dual of the free abelian group H1(X, Z). Now H1(GX, Z) is canonically isomorphic to H1(X, Z) = Hom(GX, R/Z) and there is a canonical homotopy class of mappings X −→ GX which induces the identity mapping on H1. The answer: we know whatever information can be read off from GX; and are ignorant of anything that gets lost in the projection X → GX. The theory of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces offers us a somewhat analogous analysis of what we know and don’t know about X, when we equip ourselves with n-dimensional cohomology, for any specific n, with specific coefficients. If we repeat our rhetorical question in the context of algebraic geometry, where the structure is somewhat richer, can we hope for a similar discussion? In algebraic topology, the standard cohomology functor is uniquely characterized by the basic Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms in terms of a simple normalization (the value of the functor on a single point). In contrast, in algebraic geometry we have a more intricate set- up to deal with: for one thing, we don’t even have a cohomology theory with coefficients in Z for varieties over a field k unless we provide a homomorphism k → C, so that we can form the topological space of complex points on our variety, and compute the cohomology groups of that topological space.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclic Homology and Equivariant Homology
    Invent.math. 87, 403-423 (1987) [nffelltiolle$ mathematicae Springer-Verlag1987 Cyclic homology and equivariant homology John D.S. Jones Mathematics Institute,University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Introduction The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between the cyclic homology and cohomology theories of Connes [9-11], see also Loday and Quillen [20], and "IF equivariant homology and cohomology theories. Here II" is the circle group. The most general results involve the definitions of the cyclic homology of cyclic chain complexes and the notions of cyclic and cocyclic spaces so precise statements will be postponed until w3. In this introduction we explain some of the formal similarities between the cyclic theory and the equivariant theory and give two examples where the general results apply. Let A be an associative algebra over a commutative ring K. Then one can form the cyclic homology HC.(A) and cohomology HC*(A) of A. These groups have periodicity operators HC,(A)-.~HC,,_z(A), HC"(A)-.HC"+Z(A). Connes [10] has defined products in cyclic cohomology and using this product structure HC*(K) becomes a polynomial ring K[u] where u has degree 2. The groups HC*(A) now become modules over this polynomial ring and the action of u corresponds to the periodicity operator. Thus it seems reasonable to regard K[u] as the natural coefficients for cyclic cohomology and then to make HC.(A) into a module over K[u] by using the periodicity operator. However it is clear that every element of HC.(A) is u-torsion so HC*(A) and HC.(A) cannot be dual over K[u].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1006.1489V2 [Math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 Ril.Ias Rfie Rmraigtesre Rils[14 Articles Survey the Reading from Profited Also I Article
    Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume 8, Number 1 (Special Issue: In honor of F. Thomas Farrell and Lowell E. Jones, Part 1 of 2 ) 1—14, 2012 The Work of Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones in Topology and Geometry James F. Davis∗ Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones caused a paradigm shift in high-dimensional topology, away from the view that high-dimensional topology was, at its core, an algebraic subject, to the current view that geometry, dynamics, and analysis, as well as algebra, are key for classifying manifolds whose fundamental group is infinite. Their collaboration produced about fifty papers over a twenty-five year period. In this tribute for the special issue of Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly in their honor, I will survey some of the impact of their joint work and mention briefly their individual contributions – they have written about one hundred non-joint papers. 1 Setting the stage arXiv:1006.1489v2 [math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 In order to indicate the Farrell–Jones shift, it is necessary to describe the situation before the onset of their collaboration. This is intimidating – during the period of twenty-five years starting in the early fifties, manifold theory was perhaps the most active and dynamic area of mathematics. Any narrative will have omissions and be non-linear. Manifold theory deals with the classification of ∗I thank Shmuel Weinberger and Tom Farrell for their helpful comments on a draft of this article. I also profited from reading the survey articles [14] and [4]. 2 James F. Davis manifolds. There is an existence question – when is there a closed manifold within a particular homotopy type, and a uniqueness question, what is the classification of manifolds within a homotopy type? The fifties were the foundational decade of manifold theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Part III Essay on Serre's Conjecture
    Serre’s conjecture Alex J. Best June 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Background 2 2.1 Modular forms . 2 2.2 Galois representations . 6 3 Obtaining Galois representations from modular forms 13 3.1 Congruences for Ramanujan’s t function . 13 3.2 Attaching Galois representations to general eigenforms . 15 4 Serre’s conjecture 17 4.1 The qualitative form . 17 4.2 The refined form . 18 4.3 Results on Galois representations associated to modular forms 19 4.4 The level . 21 4.5 The character and the weight mod p − 1 . 22 4.6 The weight . 24 4.6.1 The level 2 case . 25 4.6.2 The level 1 tame case . 27 4.6.3 The level 1 non-tame case . 28 4.7 A counterexample . 30 4.8 The proof . 31 5 Examples 32 5.1 A Galois representation arising from D . 32 5.2 A Galois representation arising from a D4 extension . 33 6 Consequences 35 6.1 Finiteness of classes of Galois representations . 35 6.2 Unramified mod p Galois representations for small p . 35 6.3 Modularity of abelian varieties . 36 7 References 37 1 1 Introduction In 1987 Jean-Pierre Serre published a paper [Ser87], “Sur les representations´ modulaires de degre´ 2 de Gal(Q/Q)”, in the Duke Mathematical Journal. In this paper Serre outlined a conjecture detailing a precise relationship between certain mod p Galois representations and specific mod p modular forms. This conjecture and its variants have become known as Serre’s conjecture, or sometimes Serre’s modularity conjecture in order to distinguish it from the many other conjectures Serre has made.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclic Homology of Affine Hypersurfaces with Isolated Singularities
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED ALGEBRA Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 120 (1997) 291-299 Cyclic homology of affine hypersurfaces with isolated singularities Ruth I. Michler * Department of Mathematics, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-5116, USA Communicated by C.A. Weibel; received 20 September 1995; revised 17 January 1996 Abstract We consider reduced, affine hypersurfaces with only isolated singularities. We give an explicit computation of the Hodge-components of their cyclic homology in terms of de Rham cohomology and torsion modules of differentials for large n. It turns out that the vector spaces HC,(A) are finite dimensional for n 2 N - 1. @ 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. 1991 Math. Subj. Class.: 19, 14, 13 1. Introduction Let R = K[XI,&... ,X,I,] with K being an algebraically closed field of character- istic zero. Throughout this paper A denotes a reduced hypersurface with only isolated singularities given by A = R/(F), whith F E K[X~,&, . ,X,1. For a definition of the module of Kiihler differentials Qfi,K see for example [22, 8.8.1., p. 2941. The cohomol- ogy of the complex where d denotes the exterior differential, is called the de Rham cohomology of A and denoted by H&(A). In this paper we will compute the Hodge components H($)(A) of cyclic homology of a hypersurface with isolated singularities. We will use the iden- tification in [20] of the nth Hochschild homology groups with torsion submodules of differentials.
    [Show full text]
  • Roots of L-Functions of Characters Over Function Fields, Generic
    Roots of L-functions of characters over function fields, generic linear independence and biases Corentin Perret-Gentil Abstract. We first show joint uniform distribution of values of Kloost- erman sums or Birch sums among all extensions of a finite field Fq, for ˆ almost all couples of arguments in Fq , as well as lower bounds on dif- ferences. Using similar ideas, we then study the biases in the distribu- tion of generalized angles of Gaussian primes over function fields and primes in short intervals over function fields, following recent works of Rudnick–Waxman and Keating–Rudnick, building on cohomological in- terpretations and determinations of monodromy groups by Katz. Our results are based on generic linear independence of Frobenius eigenval- ues of ℓ-adic representations, that we obtain from integral monodromy information via the strategy of Kowalski, which combines his large sieve for Frobenius with a method of Girstmair. An extension of the large sieve is given to handle wild ramification of sheaves on varieties. Contents 1. Introduction and statement of the results 1 2. Kloosterman sums and Birch sums 12 3. Angles of Gaussian primes 14 4. Prime polynomials in short intervals 20 5. An extension of the large sieve for Frobenius 22 6. Generic maximality of splitting fields and linear independence 33 7. Proof of the generic linear independence theorems 36 References 37 1. Introduction and statement of the results arXiv:1903.05491v2 [math.NT] 17 Dec 2019 Throughout, p will denote a prime larger than 5 and q a power of p. ˆ 1.1. Kloosterman and Birch sums.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivariant Resolution of Singularities and Semi-Stable Reduction In
    Equivariant Resolution of Singularities and Semi-stable Reduction in Characteristic 0 by Jianhua Wang Submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1997 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1997. All rights reserved. Author Department of Mathematics April 29, 1997 Certified by .-. ......................... Steven L. Kleiman Professor of Mathematics Thesis Supervisor ~ f~c\ Accepted by Richard B. Melrose, Chairman Departmental Graduate Committee Department of Mathematics JUN 2 5 1997 Equivariant Resolution of Singularities and Semi-stable Reduction in Characteristic 0 by Jianhua Wang Submitted to the Department of Mathematics on April 29, 1997, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract In this thesis, I shall prove the equivariant resolution of singularities theorem first, then using this theorem and the barycentric subdivision technique, I shall prove the equivariant semi-stable reduction theorem. Both results are over algebraically closed fields of characteristic 0 and their proofs are purely algebraic in nature. In the statement of the equivariant semi-stable theorem, besides giving the equivariant version of classic theorem, I shall describe more precisely what the base curve could be. I shall also discuss a stronger form of the theorem when the dimension of the fiber is less than or equal to 2. Thesis Supervisor: Steven L. Kleiman Title: Professor of Mathematics to my parents and grandparents Acknowledgments First of all I thank my thesis advisor Professor Steven Kleiman, for supporting me in all possible ways during the past three years and for imparting to me the philosophies of studying mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Motives, Volume 55.2
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/pspum/055.2 Recent Titles in This Series 55 Uwe Jannsen, Steven Kleiman, and Jean-Pierre Serre, editors, Motives (University of Washington, Seattle, July/August 1991) 54 Robert Greene and S. T. Yau, editors, Differential geometry (University of California, Los Angeles, July 1990) 53 James A. Carlson, C. Herbert Clemens, and David R. Morrison, editors, Complex geometry and Lie theory (Sundance, Utah, May 1989) 52 Eric Bedford, John P. D'Angelo, Robert £. Greene, and Steven G. Krantz, editors, Several complex variables and complex geometry (University of California, Santa Cruz, July 1989) 51 William B. Arveson and Ronald G. Douglas, editors, Operator theory/operator algebras and applications (University of New Hampshire, July 1988) 50 James Glimm, John Impagliazzo, and Isadore Singer, editors, The legacy of John von Neumann (Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, May/June 1988) 49 Robert C. Gunning and Leon Ehrenpreis, editors, Theta functions - Bowdoin 1987 (Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, July 1987) 48 R. O. Wells, Jr., editor, The mathematical heritage of Hermann Weyl (Duke University, Durham, May 1987) 47 Paul Fong, editor, The Areata conference on representations of finite groups (Humboldt State University, Areata, California, July 1986) 46 Spencer J. Bloch, editor, Algebraic geometry - Bowdoin 1985 (Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, July 1985) 45 Felix E. Browder, editor, Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications (University of California, Berkeley, July 1983) 44 William K. Allard and Frederick J. Almgren, Jr., editors, Geometric measure theory and the calculus of variations (Humboldt State University, Areata, California, July/August 1984) 43 Francois Treves, editor, Pseudodifferential operators and applications (University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, April 1984) 42 Anil Nerode and Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Compactified Jacobians of Reduced Curves
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 369, Number 8, August 2017, Pages 5341–5402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/tran/6823 Article electronically published on March 6, 2017 FINE COMPACTIFIED JACOBIANS OF REDUCED CURVES MARGARIDA MELO, ANTONIO RAPAGNETTA, AND FILIPPO VIVIANI Abstract. To every singular reduced projective curve X one can associate many fine compactified Jacobians, depending on the choice of a polarization on X, each of which yields a modular compactification of a disjoint union of a finite number of copies of the generalized Jacobian of X. Weinvestigatethe geometric properties of fine compactified Jacobians focusing on curves having locally planar singularities. We give examples of nodal curves admitting non- isomorphic (and even nonhomeomorphic over the field of complex numbers) fine compactified Jacobians. We study universal fine compactified Jacobians, which are relative fine compactified Jacobians over the semiuniversal deforma- tion space of the curve X. Finally, we investigate the existence of twisted Abel maps with values in suitable fine compactified Jacobians. Contents 1. Introduction 5341 2. Fine compactified Jacobians 5349 3. Varying the polarization 5358 4. Deformation theory 5368 5. Universal fine compactified Jacobians 5373 6. Abel maps 5387 7. Examples: Locally planar curves of arithmetic genus 1 5395 Acknowledgments 5399 References 5399 1. Introduction Aim and motivation. The aim of this paper is to study fine compactified Jaco- bians of a reduced projective connected curve X over an algebraically closed field k (of arbitrary characteristic), with special emphasis on the case where X has locally planar singularities. Recall that given such a curve X,thegeneralized Jacobian J(X)ofX, defined to be the connected component of the Picard variety of X containing the identity, parametrizes line bundles on X that have multidegree zero, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Msc Lecture: Enumerative Geometry
    MSc Lecture: Enumerative Geometry Lecture by Helge Ruddat; Exercises by Tim Gräfnitz; Tu & We 16:15 – 17:45 on Zoom Description Hermann Schubert developed an effective method for solving counting problems in geometry in his book "Kalkül der abzählenden Geometrie" that appeared in 1879. A basic example is the question “how many lines in R^3 meet four given lines in general position?”. Do you know the answer? The calculus is now known as “Schubert calculus”, see (1),(2),(3). Schubert calculus is immensely powerful, e.g. you can use it to find that the number of twisted cubic curves in 3-space that are tangential to 12 quadric surfaces is 5.819.539.783.680. Even though it clearly worked, for a long time it has been unknown what the theoretical basis for the calculus truly is, i.e. nobody knew why it worked. It became the famous Hilbert problem 15 to find a theoretical basis for Schubert calculus. This was looong time ago. Today we know that intersection theory, the spaces of stable maps and Gromov-Witten theory form the right theoretical framework that underlies Schubert calculus - though there are also competing alternative approaches like Donaldson-Thomas theory. The purpose of this lecture is to introduce the basics of Gromov-Witten theory with a particular view to mirror symmetry and thus the relationship with tropical curve counting. Prerequisites When taking this class, you should have some basic understanding of algebraic geometry or complex geometry or complex analysis, that is you should either know what an algebraic variety is or know what a complex manifold or Riemann surface is.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Uuyeotgonbayar-Dissertation
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School LOCAL INDEX THEOREM IN NONCOMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY A Dissertation in Mathematics by Uuye Otgonbayar c 2009 Uuye Otgonbayar Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 The Dissertation of Uuye Otgonbayar was reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Nigel Higson Evan Pugh Professor of Mathematics Dissertation Advisor, Chair of Committee John Roe Professor of Mathematics Head of the Department of Mathematics Nathanial Brown Associate Professor of Mathematics John Collins Professor of Physics ∗Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. Abstract We consider the multiplicative property of index cocycles associated to a spectral triple. We construct a perturbation of the JLO-cocyle and prove that it is multiplicative on the cochain level with respect to the exterior product of theta-summable spectral triples and the product in entire cyclic theory. Furthermore, we show that this cocycle admits an asymptotic expansion if the spectral triple admits the analogue of an Euler vector field. Using Laurent series, we obtain a multiplicative local index cocycle. iii Contents List of Symbols vi Acknowledgments xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 The Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem. 1 Vector Bundle Modification and K-homology . 4 Spectral Triples . 4 Description of Contents . 5 Chapter 2 Spectral Triples and Index Theory 7 2.1 Definition and Examples of Spectral Triples . 7 2.1.1 Spectral Triples . 7 Sum and Product of Spectral Triples . 10 Perturbation of a Spectral Triple . 11 2.1.2 Multigraded Spectral Triples . 12 Clifford Algebras . 12 Multigraded Spectral Triples . 15 Odd Spectral Triples .
    [Show full text]